Mobile Access Equipment From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Final Determination of Antidumping Investigation; Notice of Amended Final Determination
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
On December 11, 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued its final judgment in Coalition of American Manufacturers of Mobile Access Equipment v. United States, Court No. 22-00152, sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce's (Commerce) final remand redetermination pertaining in the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation of mobile access equipment (MAE) from the People's Republic of China (China) covering the period of investigation (POI) July 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. Commerce is notifying the public that the CIT's final judgment is not in harmony with Commerce's final determination in that investigation, and that Commerce is amending the final determination and the resulting antidumping duty (AD) order with respect to the dumping margin for certain respondents eligible for a separate rate (i.e., Zhejiang Dingli Machinery Co., Ltd.; Hunan Sinoboom Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.; Mantall Heavy Industry Co., Ltd.; Noblelift Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.; Oshkosh JLG (Tianjin) Equipment Technology Co., Ltd.; Sany Marine Heavy Industry Co., Ltd.; Terex (Changzhou) Machinery Co., Ltd.; and Xuzhou Construction Machinery Group Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.). The merchandise exported by these exporters is included in the amended AD order.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 247 (Wednesday, December 31, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 31, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61373-61375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-24034]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-139]
Mobile Access Equipment From the People's Republic of China:
Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Final Determination of
Antidumping Investigation; Notice of Amended Final Determination
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 11, 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade
(CIT) issued its final judgment in Coalition of American Manufacturers
of Mobile Access Equipment v. United States, Court No. 22-00152,
sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce's (Commerce) final remand
redetermination pertaining in the less-than-fair-value (LTFV)
investigation of mobile access equipment (MAE) from the People's
Republic of China (China) covering the period of investigation (POI)
July 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. Commerce is notifying the
public that the CIT's final judgment is not in harmony with Commerce's
final determination in that investigation, and that Commerce is
amending the final determination and the resulting antidumping duty
(AD) order with respect to the dumping margin for certain respondents
eligible for a separate rate (i.e., Zhejiang Dingli Machinery Co.,
Ltd.; Hunan Sinoboom Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.; Mantall Heavy
Industry Co., Ltd.; Noblelift Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.; Oshkosh
JLG (Tianjin) Equipment Technology Co., Ltd.; Sany Marine Heavy
Industry Co., Ltd.; Terex (Changzhou) Machinery Co., Ltd.; and Xuzhou
Construction Machinery Group Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.). The merchandise
exported by these exporters is included in the amended AD order.
DATES: Applicable December 22, 2025.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dmitry Vladimirov, AD/CVD
[[Page 61374]]
Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0665.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 22, 2022, Commerce published its Final Determination in
the LTFV investigation of MAE from China.\1\ On April 14, 2022,
Commerce subsequently published the AD order on MAE from China.\2\ The
Coalition of American Manufacturers of Mobile Access Equipment appealed
Commerce's Final Determination with respect to its surrogate values for
ocean freight and certain minor fabricated steel parts.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Mobile Access Equipment and Subassemblies
Thereof from the People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 87 FR 9576 (February
22, 2022) (Final Determination), and accompanying Issues and
Decision Memorandum (IDM).
\2\ See Certain Mobile Access Equipment and Subassemblies
Thereof from the People's Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order,
87 FR 22190 (April 14, 2022) (Order).
\3\ See Coalition of American Manufacturers of Mobile Access
Equipment v. United States, Court No. 22-00152, Complaint (ECF No.
8) (CIT June 13, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On May 31, 2024, the CIT remanded the Final Determination to
Commerce, ordering Commerce to reconsider or further explain: (1) its
determination as to ocean freight costs; and (2) its valuation of
`minor fabricated steel components' (as that term was used in the Final
Determination).\4\ In the Final Remand,\5\ Commerce reconsidered its
determination and relied on Maersk data for ocean freight and Brazilian
per-unit import average unit value for Harmonized System subheading
8431.20.90 for certain minor fabricated steel components.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Coalition of American Manufacturers of Mobile Access
Equipment v. United States, Court No. 22-00152, Slip Op. 24-66 (CIT
May 31, 2024).
\5\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court
Remand, Coalition of American Manufacturers of Mobile Access
Equipment v. United States, Court No. 22-00152, Slip Op. 24-66 (CIT
October 28, 2024) (Final Remand).
\6\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On December 11, 2025, the CIT sustained Commerce's final remand
redetermination.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Coalition of American Manufacturers of Mobile Access
Equipment v. United States, Court No. 22-00152, Slip Op. 24-66 (CIT
December 11, 2025).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken,\8\ as clarified by Diamond Sawblades,\9\
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that, pursuant
to section 516A(c) and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act), Commerce must publish a notice of court decision that is not ``in
harmony'' with a Commerce determination and must suspend liquidation of
entries pending a ``conclusive'' court decision. The CIT's December 11,
2025, judgment constitutes a final decision of the CIT that is not in
harmony with Commerce's Final Determination. Thus, this notice is
published in fulfillment of the publication requirements of Timken.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir.
1990) (Timken).
\9\ See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United
States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades).
\10\ See Final Determination, 87 FR at 9576; see also Certain
Mobile Access Equipment and Subassemblies Thereof from the People's
Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order and Amended Final
Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, 86 FR 70439 (December
10, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amended Final Determination
Because there is now a final court judgment, Commerce is amending
its Final Determination with respect to the following exporter-producer
combinations:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash deposit
Weighted- rate (adjusted
average for subsidy
Exporter Producer dumping margin offsets)
(percent ad (percent ad
valorem) valorem) \10\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zhejiang Dingli Machinery Co., Ltd............ Zhejiang Dingli Machinery Co., 37.20 37.04
Ltd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Separate Rate Applicable to the Following Non-Selected Companies
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash deposit rate
Non-selected exporter receiving a Producer supplying the non- Weighted- average (adjusted for
separate rate selected exporter receiving dumping margin subsidy offsets)
a separate rate (percent) (percent)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hunan Sinoboom Intelligent Equipment Co., Hunan Sinoboom Intelligent 56.50 56.33
Ltd. Equipment Co., Ltd.
Mantall Heavy Industry Co., Ltd.......... Mantall Heavy Industry Co., 56.50 56.33
Ltd.
Noblelift Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Noblelift Intelligent 56.50 56.33
Equipment Co., Ltd.
Oshkosh JLG (Tianjin) Equipment Noblelift Intelligent 56.50 56.33
Technology Co., Ltd. Equipment Co., Ltd.
Sany Marine Heavy Industry Co., Ltd...... Sany Marine Heavy Industry 56.50 56.33
Co., Ltd.
Terex (Changzhou) Machinery Co., Ltd..... Terex (Changzhou) Machinery 56.50 56.33
Co, Ltd.
Xuzhou Construction Machinery Group Imp. Xuzhou Construction 56.50 56.33
& Exp. Co., Ltd. Machinery Group Fire-
Fighting Safety Equipment
Co., Ltd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
Commerce will issue revised cash deposit instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection for: (1) Hunan Sinoboom Intelligent
Equipment Co., Ltd.; (2) Mantall Heavy Industry Co., Ltd.; (3)
Noblelift Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.; (4) Oshkosh JLG (Tianjin)
Equipment Technology Co., Ltd.; (5) Sany Marine Heavy Industry Co.,
Ltd.; (6) Terex (Changzhou) Machinery Co., Ltd.; (7) Xuzhou
Construction Machinery Group Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.; and (8) Xuzhou
Construction Machinery Group Fire-Fighting Safety Equipment Co., Ltd.
Because Zhejiang Dingli Machinery Co., Ltd., has a superseding cash
deposit
[[Page 61375]]
rate, i.e., there have been final results published in a subsequent
administrative review,\11\ Commerce will not issue revised cash deposit
instructions for this company. This notice will not affect the current
cash deposit rate for this company.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Certain Mobile Access Equipment and Subassemblies
Thereof from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023, 89 FR 88730
(November 8, 2024).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
516A(c) and (e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: December 23, 2025.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2025-24034 Filed 12-30-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.