Proposed Rule2025-23963

Implementation of the Administrative False Claims Act

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
December 30, 2025

Issuing agencies

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Abstract

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration is proposing to amend its regulations in order to fully implement the Administrative False Claims Act (AFCA), as amended by the Fiscal Year 2025 National Defense Authorization Act. This updated rule establishes clear and comprehensive administrative procedures for investigating, evaluating, and imposing civil penalties and monetary assessments on individuals or entities that knowingly make, submit, or present false claims, representations, or misleading statements to NASA. The AFCA offers a streamlined, agency-level enforcement remedy that enables NASA to more effectively address smaller, lower-dollar fraud cases, safeguard critical Federal funds, and strongly deter fraudulent conduct.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 246 (Tuesday, December 30, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 30, 2025)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 61109-61111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-23963]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

14 CFR Part 1264

RIN 2700-AE79
[NASA Document Number: NASA-25-034; NASA Docket Number: NASA-2025-0069]


Implementation of the Administrative False Claims Act

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration is proposing 
to amend its regulations in order to fully implement the Administrative 
False Claims Act (AFCA), as amended by the Fiscal Year 2025 National 
Defense Authorization Act. This updated rule establishes clear and 
comprehensive administrative procedures for investigating, evaluating, 
and imposing civil penalties and monetary assessments on individuals or 
entities that knowingly make, submit, or present false claims, 
representations, or misleading statements to NASA. The AFCA offers a 
streamlined, agency-level enforcement remedy that enables NASA to more 
effectively address smaller, lower-dollar fraud cases, safeguard 
critical Federal funds, and strongly deter fraudulent conduct.

DATES: NASA must receive comments on or before February 13, 2026.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by RIN 2700-AE79 through 
the Federal eRulemaking Portal: <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. Follow the 
online instructions for submitting comments. All comments received will 
be posted without change to the Federal eRulemaking Portal; including 
any personal information provided.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Vogt, 202-763-3659, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bdcfd2dfd8cfc993d793cbd2dac9fdd3dccedc93dad2cb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="493b262b2c3b3d6723673f262e3d0927283a28672e263f">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    On December 23, 2024, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) 
for Fiscal Year 2025 (FY 2025 NDAA) (Pub. L. 118-159) was signed into 
law. Under section 5203, the FY 2025 NDAA revitalizes an existing but 
underutilized fraud enforcement mechanism: the Administrative False 
Claims Act of 2023 (AFCA). This Act, previously known as the Program 
Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986, offers a streamlined administrative 
remedy for addressing false claims and statements that the Department 
of Justice (DOJ) opts not to prosecute. The new statute requires

[[Page 61110]]

amendment to the NASA's regulations at 14 CFR 1264 within 180 days of 
enactment. The AFCA complements the more widely known and widely used 
civil False Claims Act by providing an administrative process by which 
Federal executive branch agencies can address relatively small dollar 
value false claims that might not warrant the attention of the DOJ. The 
liability provisions of the AFCA remain closely modeled on those in the 
False Claims Act. The principal differences between the False Claims 
Act and the AFCA are that the AFCA does not include a qui tam 
enforcement mechanism, covers false written statements even in the 
absence of a claim, and provides for administrative rather than 
judicial resolution.

II. Regulatory Analysis

Executive Order (E.O.) 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review, E.O. 
13563--Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, and E.O. 14192--
Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation

    E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and 
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is 
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits 
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety 
effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the 
importance of quantifying both costs and benefits of reducing costs, of 
harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule is a 
significant regulatory action under E.O. 12866. This rule is expected 
to be an E.O. 14192 deregulatory action.

E.O. 13132--Federalism

    E.O. 13132 requires agencies to ensure meaningful and timely input 
by state and local officials in the development of regulatory policies 
that may have a substantial, direct effect on the states, on the 
relationship between the National Government and the states, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. This action has been analyzed in accordance with the 
principles and criteria contained in the order, and NASA has determined 
that this action will not have a substantial direct effect or 
federalism implications on the states and would not preempt any state 
law or regulation or affect the states' ability to discharge 
traditional state governmental functions. Therefore, consultation with 
the states is not necessary.

E.O. 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal 
Governments

    This final rule has been analyzed in accordance with the principles 
and criteria contained in E.O. 13175. NASA has determined that the 
removal of Subpart 1204.3 does not significantly or uniquely affect the 
communities of the Indian tribal governments or impose substantial 
direct compliance costs on them; the funding and consultation 
requirements of E.O. 13175 do not apply.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    Because no notice of proposed rulemaking is required, the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act does not require an initial or final 
regulatory flexibility analysis.\1\

Paperwork Reduction Act

    No collections of information pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act are contained in the final rule.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

    This rule will not impose a Federal mandate that may result in the 
expenditure by state, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, 
or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year.

List of Subjects 14 CFR Part 1264

    Administrative practice and procedure; Claims; Fraud.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, NASA proposes to amend 
14 CFR part 1264 as follows:

PART 1264--IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE FALSE CLAIMS ACT

0
1. The authority citation for part 1264 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3809, 51 U.S.C. 20113(a).


0
2. In Sec.  1264.100, revise paragraphs (a) to read as follows:


Sec.  1264.100  Basis and purpose.

    (a) Basis. This part implements the Administrative False Claims 
Act, Public Law 99-509, sections 6101-6104, 100 Stat. 1874 (October 
1986), amended Public Law 118-159, December 23, 2024, 138 Stat, 2440, 
to be codified at 31 U.S.C. 3801-3812. 31 U.S.C. 3809 of the statute 
requires each authority head to promulgate regulations necessary to 
implement the provisions of the statute.
* * * * *

0
3. In Sec.  1264.101, amend paragraphs (e)(2)(iii), (g), (l), (m), (p), 
(r), to read as follows:


Sec.  1264.101  Definitions.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    (3) Made to the authority which has the effect of concealing or 
improperly avoiding or decreasing an obligation to pay, transmit or 
account for property, services, or money to the authority.
* * * * *
    (g) Consent hearing means that the authority and the defendant 
consent, as provided in Sec.  1264.106(c), that the presiding officer 
be the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (CBCA). The Chairperson may 
designate another administrative judge of the CBCA as presiding officer 
in a consent hearing.
* * * * *
    (l) Investigating official means the NASA Inspector General, or 
designee who is serving in a position for which the rate of basic pay, 
is not less than the minimum rate of basic pay for the grade GS-16 
(under the General Schedule).
    (m) Knows or has reason to know, for purposes of establishing 
liability, means that a person:
    (1) Has actual knowledge that the claim or statement is false, 
fictitious, or fraudulent;
    (2) Acts in deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the 
claim or statement; or
    (3) Acts in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the claim 
or statement and no proof of specific intent to defraud is required.
* * * * *
    (p) Presiding officer, except as provided for pursuant to consent 
trial notice, means
    (1) In the case of an authority to which the provisions of 
subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5 apply, an ALJ appointed in the 
authority pursuant to section 3105 of such title or detailed to the 
authority pursuant to section 3344 of such title.
    (2) If the authority is not subject to the provisions of Subchapter 
II of Chapter 5, Title 5, U.S.C. an officer or employee of the 
Authority who--
    (i) Is appointed by the Authority head to conduct hearings under 
this part;
    (ii) Is assigned to cases in rotation so far as practicable;
    (iii) May not perform duties inconsistent with the duties and 
responsibilities of a presiding officer.
    (iv) Is entitled to pay prescribed by the Office of Personnel 
Management independently of ratings and recommendations made by the 
authority and in accordance with Chapter 51 Title 5 and Subchapter III 
of Chapter 53 of Title 5;
    (v) Is not subject to performance appraisal pursuant to Chapter 43 
of Title 5; and

[[Page 61111]]

    (vi) May be removed, suspended, furloughed, or reduced in grade or 
pay only for good cause established and determined by the Merit Systems 
Protection Board on the record after opportunity for hearing by such 
Board.
    (3) A member of the board of contract appeals pursuant to section 
7105 of title 41, if the Authority does not employ an available 
presiding officer under subparagraph (1) of this section.
* * * * *
    (r) Reviewing official means the NASA Associate Administrator for 
Mission Support or designee.
* * * * *

0
4. In Sec.  1264.102, amend paragraph (a)(1) by adding a new 
subparagraph (v) to read as follows:
* * * * *
    (v) Is made to an authority which has the effect of concealing or 
improperly avoiding or decreasing an obligation to pay or transmit 
property, services, or money to the authority,
    (2) Shall be subject, in addition to any other remedy that may be 
prescribed by law, to a civil penalty of not more than $14,308 for each 
such claim.
* * * * *
0
5. In Sec.  1264.103, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:
* * * * *
    (b) If the investigating official concludes that an action under 
the Administrative False Claims Act may be warranted, the investigating 
official shall submit a report containing the findings and conclusions 
of such investigation to the reviewing official.
* * * * *
0
6. In Sec.  1264.104, amend paragraph (a) and subparagraph (b)(4) to 
read as follows:
    (a) If, based on the report of the investigating official under 
Sec.  1264.103(b), the reviewing official determines that there is 
adequate evidence to believe that a person is liable under the 
Administrative False Claims Act, and there is a reasonable prospect of 
collecting, from a person with respect to whom the reviewing official 
is referring allegations of liability in such notice, the amount for 
which such person may be liable, the reviewing official shall transmit 
to the Attorney General a written notice of the reviewing official's 
intention to issue a complaint under Sec.  1264.106.
    (b) * * *
* * * * *
    (4) An estimate of the amount of money or the value of property, 
services, or other benefits requested or demanded in violation of the 
Administrative False Claims.
* * * * *
0
7. In Sec.  1264.105, revise subparagraph (a)(2) to read as follows:
    (a) * * *
* * * * *
    (2) In the case of allegations of liability under Sec.  1264.102(a) 
with respect to a claim, the reviewing official determines that, with 
respect to such claim or a group of related claims submitted at the 
same time such claim is submitted (as defined in paragraphs (b) of this 
section), the amount of money or the value of property or services 
demanded or requested in violation of Sec.  1264.102(a) does not exceed 
$1,000,000.
0
8. In Sec.  1264.106, revise subparagraph (c)(1) to read as follows:
* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (1) Notice to Consent to the chairperson of the Armed Services 
Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA), or Designee, as presiding officer;
* * * * *
0
9. In Sec.  1264.118, revise subparagraph (c)(7) to read as follows:
* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (7) Scheduling dates for the exchange of witness lists, statements, 
and of proposed exhibits;
* * * * *
0
10. In Sec.  1264.120, revise subparagraph (d)(1) and add a new 
subparagraph (d)(6) to read as follows:
* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (1) A party seeking discovery must file a motion with the presiding 
officer. Such a motion shall be accompanied by a copy of the discovery 
request or, in the cast of depositions, a summary of the scope of the 
proposed deposition.
* * * * *
    (6) The presiding officer shall regulate the timing of discovery.
0
11. In Sec.  1264.123, revise paragraph (b)(9) to read as follows:
* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (9) That the parties simultaneously file specified documents or 
information as directed by the presiding officer.
* * * * *
0
12. In Sec.  1264.135, revise the paragraph to read as follows: The 
presiding officer may decide on any post-hearing motions and may 
require the parties to file post-hearing briefs. In any event, upon 
approval of the presiding officer, any party may file a post-hearing 
brief. The presiding officer shall fix the time for filing such briefs, 
not to exceed 60 days from the date the parties receive the transcript 
of the hearing or, if applicable, the stipulated record. Such briefs 
may be accompanied by proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. 
The presiding officer may permit the parties to file reply briefs, and 
may grant an extension of the 60-day time period or other time for good 
cause shown.
* * * * *
0
13. In Sec.  1264.144, revise the paragraph to read as follows:
    (a) Any amount collected under this chapter shall be credited first 
to reimburse the authority or other Federal entity that expended costs 
in support of the investigation or prosecution of the action, including 
any court or hearing costs; and amounts reimbursed under clause shall 
be deposited in:
    (i) the appropriations account of the authority or other Federal 
entity from which the costs described in subparagraph (a) were 
obligated;
    (ii) a similar appropriations account of the authority or other 
Federal entity; or
    (iii) if the authority or other Federal entity expended 
nonappropriated funds, another appropriate account; and remain 
available until expended.
    (b) Any amount remaining after reimbursements described in above 
shall be deposited as miscellaneous receipts in the Treasury of the 
United States.
* * * * *
0
14. Revise Sec.  1264.146 to read as follows:
    (a) A notice to the person alleged to be liable with respect to a 
claim or statement shall be mailed or delivered in accordance with 14 
CFR 1264.107 not later than the later of--
    (1) 6 years after the date on which the violation is committed; or
    (2) 3 years after the date on which facts material to the action 
are known or reasonably should have been known by the authority head, 
but in no event more than 10 years after the date on which the 
violation is committed.
    (b) Such notice shall specify the allegations of liability against 
such person and shall state the right of such person to request a 
hearing with respect to such allegations.
0
15. Remove Appendix A to Part 1264.

Nanette Smith,
Team Lead, NASA Directives and Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2025-23963 Filed 12-29-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on December 30, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.