Proposed Rule2025-23857

Suretyship and Guaranty; Segregated Deposit and Collateral

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
December 29, 2025

Issuing agencies

National Credit Union Administration

Abstract

The NCUA Board (Board) seeks comment on a proposed rule to remove the segregated deposit and collateral requirements when a federally insured credit union (FICU) acts as a surety and guarantor. Removing this regulation will provide FICUs with greater flexibility to design products that meet member needs. FICUs would remain subject to the other requirements regarding surety and guaranty agreements.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 245 (Monday, December 29, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 245 (Monday, December 29, 2025)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 60586-60588]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-23857]



[[Page 60586]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION

12 CFR Part 701

RIN 3133-AF80


Suretyship and Guaranty; Segregated Deposit and Collateral

AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The NCUA Board (Board) seeks comment on a proposed rule to 
remove the segregated deposit and collateral requirements when a 
federally insured credit union (FICU) acts as a surety and guarantor. 
Removing this regulation will provide FICUs with greater flexibility to 
design products that meet member needs. FICUs would remain subject to 
the other requirements regarding surety and guaranty agreements.

DATES: Comments must be received by February 27, 2026.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted in one of the following ways. 
(Please send comments by one method only):
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. 
The docket number for this proposed rule is NCUA-2025-1434. Follow the 
``Submit a comment'' instructions. If you are reading this document on 
<a href="http://federalregister.gov">federalregister.gov</a>, you may use the green ``SUBMIT A PUBLIC COMMENT'' 
button beneath this rulemaking's title to submit a comment to the 
<a href="http://regulations.gov">regulations.gov</a> docket. A plain language summary of the proposed rule 
is also available on the docket website.
    <bullet> Mail: Address to Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks, Secretary of 
the Board, National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street, 
Alexandria, Virginia 22314-3428.
    <bullet> Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as mailing address.
    Mailed and hand-delivered comments must be received by the close of 
the comment period.
    Public inspection: Please follow the search instructions on <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> to view the public comments. Do not include any 
personally identifiable information (such as name, address, or other 
contact information) or confidential business information that you do 
not want publicly disclosed. All comments are public records; they are 
publicly displayed exactly as received and will not be deleted, 
modified, or redacted. Comments may be submitted anonymously. If you 
are unable to access public comments on the internet, you may contact 
the NCUA for alternative access by calling (703) 518-6540 or emailing 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0e41494d436f67624e606d7b6f20696178"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ace3ebefe1cdc5c0ecc2cfd9cd82cbc3da">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keisha Brooks, Attorney-Advisor, 
Office of General Counsel, at (703) 518-6540 or at 1775 Duke Street, 
Alexandria, VA 22314.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Introduction

A. Background

    Federal Credit Unions (FCUs) may only engage in activities that are 
expressly authorized either by statute or within the FCU's incidental 
powers. The Federal Credit Union Act (FCU Act) explicitly grants FCUs 
the power to, among other activities, make loans to members and to 
provide letters of credit on behalf of members.\1\ The accompanying 
incidental powers provision states that each FCU may ``exercise such 
incidental powers as shall be necessary or requisite to enable it to 
carry on effectively the business for which it is incorporated.'' \2\ 
The FCU Act defines the business for which each FCU is incorporated: 
``promoting thrift among its members and creating a source of credit 
for provident or productive purposes.'' \3\ Section 701.20, established 
in 2004, recognizes the ability of FCUs to enter into suretyship and 
guaranty agreements for their members as an incidental power, providing 
additional flexibility to meet member needs.\4\ For example, the 
regulation allows FCUs to become one party in a three-way lending 
relationship, where the FCU agrees to take responsibility for repayment 
if the member is unable to meet the lending obligation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 12 U.S.C. 1757(5), 1757a.
    \2\ 12 U.S.C. 1757(17).
    \3\ 12 U.S.C. 1752(1).
    \4\ 69 FR 8547, Feb. 25, 2004.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 701.20 defines these arrangements and, to promote safety 
and soundness, requires that the FCU's obligation be for a fixed amount 
and duration, that the FCU's performance of the agreement creates an 
authorized loan that complies with the applicable lending regulations, 
and that it obtains a segregated deposit from the member sufficient to 
cover the potential liability.
    As provided in Sec.  741.221 of the NCUA regulations, these 
requirements also apply to federally insured state credit unions 
(FISCUs) that are authorized under state law to enter into suretyship 
and guaranty agreements.\5\ The rule was amended in 2019 as part of a 
regulatory reform initiative to reduce burden and improve clarity by 
updating internal cross-references.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 12 CFR 741.221.
    \6\ 84 FR 10975 (Mar. 25, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Legal Authority

    The Board has the legal authority to issue this proposed rule 
pursuant to its plenary rulemaking authority under the FCU Act and its 
specific rulemaking authority under the various acts the Board 
administers.\7\ Under the FCU Act, the NCUA is the chartering and 
supervisory authority for FCUs and the federal supervisory authority 
for FICUs.\8\ The FCU Act grants the NCUA a broad mandate to issue 
regulations governing both FCUs and all FICUs. Section 120 of the FCU 
Act is a general grant of regulatory authority and authorizes the Board 
to prescribe rules and regulations for the administration of the FCU 
Act.\9\ Section 207 of the FCU Act is a specific grant of authority 
over share insurance coverage, conservatorships, and liquidations.\10\ 
Section 209 of the FCU Act is a plenary grant of regulatory authority 
to the Board to issue rules and regulations necessary or appropriate to 
carry out its role as share insurer for all FICUs.\11\ Accordingly, the 
FCU Act grants the Board broad rulemaking authority to ensure that the 
credit union industry and the National Credit Union Share Insurance 
Fund remain safe and sound.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 12 U.S.C. 1766, 1789.
    \8\ 12 U.S.C. 1752-1775.
    \9\ 12 U.S.C. 1766(a).
    \10\ 12 U.S.C. 1787(b)(1).
    \11\ 12 U.S.C. 1789(a)(11).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Proposed Rule

    As part of its deregulatory initiative, the Board proposes to 
remove paragraphs (c)(3) and (d) of Sec.  701.20, which impose 
segregated deposit and collateral requirements when FICUs act as a 
surety and guarantor. Under these provisions, depending on the nature 
of the collateral, an FCU must have a perfected security interest in 
collateral equal to 100 or 110 percent of the obligation. The 100 
percent collateral category includes cash; obligations of the United 
States or its agencies; obligations fully guaranteed by the United 
States or its agencies as to principal and interest; and notes, drafts, 
bills of exchange, and bankers' acceptances that are eligible for 
rediscount or purchase by a Federal Reserve Bank.\12\ The 110 percent 
collateral category includes real estate and marketable securities.\13\ 
Section 741.221 of the NCUA regulations applies these requirements to 
FISCUs

[[Page 60587]]

that are authorized under state law to act as a surety or guarantor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 12 CFR 701.20(d)(2).
    \13\ 12 CFR 701.20(d)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Board is now of the view that removing these segregated deposit 
and collateral requirements will provide FICUs the flexibility to 
design products that meet member needs. These proposed changes are 
intended to simplify the regulatory framework and reduce unnecessary 
compliance burdens.
    It is not always necessary to have a segregated deposit that fully 
covers the liability. For example, current regulations require a FICU 
acting as a surety or guarantor to create an authorized loan that 
complies with the applicable NCUA lending regulations.\14\ The NCUA's 
commercial lending regulations adopted in 2016 include collateral 
requirements that reflect a broad principles-based regulatory approach 
for FICUs engaged in member business lending activities.\15\ These 
principles are predicated on the Board's expectation that credit unions 
will maintain prudent risk management practices and sufficient capital 
to mitigate the risks associated with their commercial lending 
activities.\16\ Maintaining this additional requirement for a 
segregated deposit associated with suretyship or guaranty agreements 
adds complexity to these transactions. FICUs are best positioned to 
determine the amount and types of collateral they are willing to accept 
to cover the risk.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See 12 CFR 701.20(c)(2), 741.203, 741.221.
    \15\ See Final Rule, Member Business Loans; Commercial Lending, 
81 FR 13530, 13533 (Mar. 14, 2016); 12 CFR part 723. For FISCUs, a 
state regulator may adopt state-specific rules if the state rule 
covers at least all provisions in part 723 and is no less 
restrictive as determined by the NCUA. FISCUs in states with an 
NCUA-approved state rule may comply with the state rule and need not 
comply with part 723. See 12 CFR 723.10, 741.203.
    \16\ See Final Rule, Member Business Loans; Commercial Lending, 
81 FR 13530, 13533 (Mar. 14, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Board invites comment on all aspects of this proposed rule.

III. Regulatory Procedures

A. Providing Accountability Through Transparency Act of 2023

    The Providing Accountability Through Transparency Act of 2023 (5 
U.S.C. 553(b)(4)) (Act) requires that a notice of proposed rulemaking 
include the internet address of a summary of not more than 100 words in 
length of a proposed rule, in plain language, that shall be posted on 
the internet website under section 206(d) of the E-Government Act of 
2002 (44 U.S.C. 3501 note) (commonly known as <a href="http://regulations.gov">regulations.gov</a>). The 
Act, under its terms, applies to notices of proposed rulemaking and 
does not expressly include other types of documents that the Board 
publishes voluntarily for public comment, such as notices and interim-
final rules that request comment despite invoking ``good cause'' to 
forgo such notice and public procedure. The Board, however, has elected 
to address the Act's requirement in these types of documents in the 
interests of administrative consistency and transparency. In summary, 
the Board seeks comment on a proposed rule to remove the segregated 
deposit and collateral requirements when a FICU acts as a surety and 
guarantor. Removing this regulation will give FICUs the flexibility to 
design products that meet member needs. FICUs would remain subject to 
the other requirements regarding surety and guaranty agreements.
    The proposal and the required summary can be found at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>.

B. Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14192

    Pursuant to Executive Order 12866 (``Regulatory Planning and 
Review''), as amended by Executive Order 14215, a determination must be 
made whether a regulatory action is significant and therefore subject 
to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in accordance 
with the requirements of the Executive Order.\17\ Executive Order 13563 
(``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review'') supplements and 
reaffirms the principles, structures, and definitions governing 
contemporary regulatory review established in Executive Order 
12866.\18\ This proposed rule was drafted and reviewed in accordance 
with Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563. This proposed 
rule will reduce a burden by removing the segregated deposit and 
collateral requirements for FICU suretyship and guaranty arrangements 
and is consistent with Executive Order 13563. OMB has determined that 
this proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' as 
defined in section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 58 FR 51735 (Oct. 4, 1993).
    \18\ 76 FR 3821 (Jan. 21, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Executive Order 14192 (``Unleashing Prosperity Through 
Deregulation'') requires that any new incremental costs associated with 
new regulations shall, to the extent permitted by law, be offset by the 
elimination of existing costs associated with at least 10 prior 
regulations.\19\ This proposed rule is expected to be a deregulatory 
action for purposes of Executive Order 14192.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 90 FR 9065 (Feb. 6, 2025).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. The Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act \20\ generally requires an agency to 
conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice 
and comment rulemaking requirements, unless the agency certifies that 
the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities. If the agency makes such a certification, it 
shall publish the certification at the time of publication of either 
the proposed rule or the final rule, along with a statement providing 
the factual basis for such certification.\21\ For purposes of this 
analysis, the NCUA considers small credit unions to be those having 
under $100 million in assets.\22\ The Board fully considered the 
potential economic impacts of the regulatory amendments on small credit 
unions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
    \21\ 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
    \22\ 80 FR 57512 (Sept. 24, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To the extent that the proposed rule would have any economic 
impacts, they will be deregulatory in nature. The current rule 
authorizes FCUs to enter into suretyship and guaranty agreements. The 
proposed rule would remove the segregated deposit and collateral 
requirements for FCUs to enter into such agreements. To the extent 
FISCUs are authorized to enter into surety and guaranty agreements 
under state law, FISCUs would similarly benefit from the removal. It is 
unlikely that small credit unions will participate in either of these 
activities. While these requirements might impose some economic costs 
or create an economic benefit for FICUs, they are unlikely to be 
significant.
    Accordingly, the NCUA certifies the proposed rule would not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small credit 
unions.

D. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) generally provides that 
an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and not withstanding any other 
provision of law, a person is not required to respond to, a collection 
of information, unless it displays a currently valid Office of 
Management and Budget control number. The PRA applies to rulemakings in 
which an agency creates a new or amends existing information collection 
requirements. For purposes of the PRA, an information-collection 
requirement may take the form of a reporting, recordkeeping, or a 
third-party disclosure requirement. The NCUA has determined that the 
changes

[[Page 60588]]

addressed in this notice do not create a new information collection or 
revise an existing information collection as defined by the PRA.

E. Executive Order 13132 on Federalism

    Executive Order 13132 encourages certain agencies to consider the 
impact of their actions on state and local interests. The NCUA, an 
agency as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5), voluntarily complies with the 
executive order to adhere to fundamental federalism principles. This 
proposed rule would apply to all FICUs, including FISCUs.
    The NCUA expects that any effect on states or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government 
will be minor. These proposed changes are not intended to affect the 
division of responsibilities between the NCUA and state regulatory 
authorities with oversight of FISCUs. The proposed rule would remove 
the segregated deposit and collateral requirements imposed by Sec.  
701.20 when FCUs or FISCUs act as a surety and guarantor. FISCUs would 
remain subject to the other requirements, including compliance with 
applicable NCUA and state lending regulations.
    The proposed rulemaking may, therefore, have some direct effect on 
the states, the relationship between the national government and the 
states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government. However, to the extent the rule has any 
such effects, it will be to relieve FISCUs of a regulatory burden.

F. Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families

    The NCUA has determined that this proposed rule would not affect 
family well-being within the meaning of section 654 of the Treasury and 
General Government Appropriations Act, 1999. The proposed rule relates 
to the collateral requirements for FICUs to enter into surety and 
guaranty agreements, and any effect on family well-being is expected to 
be indirect. The proposed regulatory changes are exclusively concerned 
with removing the unnecessary segregated deposit and collateral 
requirements specific to such agreements. Any potential positive effect 
on family well-being, including financial well-being is, at most, 
indirect.

List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 701

    Advertising, Aged, Civil rights, Credit, Credit unions, Fair 
housing, Individuals with disabilities, Insurance, Marital status 
discrimination, Mortgages, Religious discrimination, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Sex discrimination, Signs and symbols, 
Surety bonds.

    By the National Credit Union Administration Board, this 19th day 
of December, 2025.
Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks,
Secretary of the Board.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the NCUA Board proposes to 
amend 12 CFR part 701, as follows:

PART 701--ORGANIZATION AND OPERATION OF FEDERAL CREDIT UNIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 701 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1752(5), 1755, 1756, 1757, 1758, 1759, 
1761a, 1761b, 1766, 1767, 1782, 1784, 1785, 1786, 1787, 1788, 1789. 
Section 701.6 is also authorized by 15 U.S.C. 3717. Section 701.31 
is also authorized by 15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 1981 and 
3601-3610. Section 701.35 is also authorized by 42 U.S.C. 4311-4312.


Sec.  701.20  [Amended]

0
2. Amend Sec.  701.20 by:
0
a. Removing paragraphs (c)(3) and (d) and
0
b. Revising paragraph (c) to read as follows:


Sec.  701.20  Suretyship and guaranty.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (1) The federal credit union limits its obligations under the 
agreement to a fixed dollar amount and a specified duration and
    (2) The federal credit union's performance under the agreement 
creates an authorized loan that complies with the applicable lending 
regulations, including the limitations on loans to one member or 
associated members or officials for purposes of Sec. Sec.  
701.21(c)(5), (d); 723.4(c).

[FR Doc. 2025-23857 Filed 12-23-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on December 29, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.