Notice2025-23712

Request for Information and Comment on Reserve Bank Payment Account Prototype

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
December 23, 2025

Issuing agencies

Federal Reserve System

Abstract

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board) seeks public input on a special purpose Reserve Bank account prototype (a Payment Account) tailored to the risks and needs of institutions focused on payments innovation. A Payment Account holder would be expected to use its account for the express purpose of clearing and settling the institution's payment activity. Payment Accounts would be designed to pose limited risk to the Federal Reserve Banks (Reserve Banks) and the overall payment system, and Reserve Banks would generally conduct a streamlined review of requests for these accounts. Any institution that is legally eligible for Federal Reserve accounts or services (accounts and services) under the Federal Reserve Act would be eligible to request a Payment Account from a Reserve Bank. The Payment Account protype does not seek to expand or otherwise change legal eligibility for access to accounts and services.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 244 (Tuesday, December 23, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 244 (Tuesday, December 23, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60096-60099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-23712]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

[Docket No. OP-1877]


Request for Information and Comment on Reserve Bank Payment 
Account Prototype

AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

ACTION: Request for information and comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board) 
seeks public input on a special purpose Reserve Bank account prototype 
(a Payment Account) tailored to the risks and needs of institutions 
focused on payments innovation. A Payment Account holder would be 
expected to use its account for the express purpose of clearing and 
settling the institution's payment activity. Payment Accounts would be 
designed to pose limited risk to the Federal Reserve Banks (Reserve 
Banks) and the overall payment system, and Reserve Banks would 
generally conduct a streamlined review of requests for these accounts. 
Any institution that is legally eligible for Federal Reserve accounts 
or services (accounts and services) under the Federal Reserve Act would 
be eligible to request a Payment Account from a Reserve Bank. The 
Payment Account protype does not seek to expand or otherwise change 
legal eligibility for access to accounts and services.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 6, 2026.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. OP-1877 by 
any of the following methods:
    <bullet> Agency Website: <a href="https://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/proposals/">https://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/proposals/</a>. Follow the instructions for submitting comments, including 
attachments. Preferred Method.
    <bullet> Mail: Benjamin W. McDonough, Deputy Secretary, Board of 
Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551.
    <bullet> Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as mailing address.
    <bullet> Other Means: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5c2c293e30353f3f3331313932282f1c3a2e3e723b332a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="34444156585d57575b5959515a4047745246561a535b42">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. You must include the 
docket number in the subject line of the message.
    Comments received are subject to public disclosure. In general, 
comments received will be made available on the Board's website at 
<a href="https://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/proposals/">https://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/proposals/</a> without change and will 
not be modified to remove personal or business information including 
confidential, contact, or other identifying information. Comments 
should not include any information such as confidential information 
that would be not appropriate for public disclosure. Public comments 
may also be viewed electronically or in person in Room M-4365A, 2001 C 
St. NW, Washington, DC 20551, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. during Federal 
business weekdays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason Hinkle, Associate Director, 
Zineb York, Manager, or Maggie Bota, Senior Financial Institution 
Policy Analyst, Division of Reserve Bank Operations and Payment 
Systems; Matthew Malloy, Chief, Division of Monetary Affairs, or 
Corinne Milliken Van Ness, Senior Counsel, Legal Division, Board of the 
Federal Reserve System: (202) 452-3000. For users of text telephone 
systems (TTY) or any TTY-based Telecommunications Relay Services, 
please call 711 from any telephone, anywhere in the United States.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The payments landscape continues to evolve rapidly as technological 
progress,

[[Page 60097]]

statutory developments, and other factors drive the introduction of 
innovative approaches to banking functions. These innovations 
necessitate adaptation throughout the financial sector, including the 
institutions and infrastructure that support a safe and efficient 
payment system.
    On August 15, 2022, after a public comment process, the Board 
adopted guidelines (Account Access Guidelines or Guidelines) for 
Reserve Banks to utilize in evaluating requests for access to accounts 
and services (access requests). The Guidelines establish a transparent, 
risk-based, and consistent set of factors for Reserve Banks to use in 
reviewing access requests from legally-eligible 
institutions.<SUP>1 2 3</SUP> The Guidelines incorporate a tiering 
framework under which access requests from certain types of entities 
(e.g., non-federally insured institutions) are subject to greater due 
diligence and scrutiny than access requests from other types of 
entities (e.g., federally-insured institutions).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 87 FR 51099 (Aug. 19, 2022).
    \2\ Information on the Federal Reserve Banks' financial 
services, including a list of such services, can be found at <a href="https://www.frbservices.org">https://www.frbservices.org</a>.
    \3\ The Guidelines do not apply to accounts provided under 
fiscal agency authority or to accounts authorized pursuant to the 
Board's Regulation N (12 CFR part 214), joint account requests, or 
account requests from designated financial market utilities, since 
existing rules or policies already set out the considerations 
involved in granting these types of accounts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Over the last three years, the business models of institutions 
submitting access requests have continued to evolve. For example, 
several institutions have explained that they are interested in access 
to accounts and services in order to reduce costs to their customers 
while increasing payment processing speed, often through new 
technologies. Some of these institutions have requested either a state 
or federal banking charter and a few have initiated requests for 
Reserve Bank accounts and services.
    Over the same period, many eligible uninsured institutions have 
requested or expressed interest in requesting a master account and have 
expressed concern about the length of time that Reserve Banks take to 
review their access requests and the likelihood of denial. Institutions 
focused primarily on payment activities may only desire access to a 
subset of Federal Reserve services through a Reserve Bank account. 
While recognizing that decisions on access requests are made at the 
discretion of the individual Reserve Banks, the Board is exploring 
whether a tailored, special purpose Payment Account could meet these 
institutions' needs while mitigating material risks identified in the 
Guidelines.

II. Payment Account Prototype

    The Board is requesting feedback on a Payment Account prototype. In 
designing the Payment Account prototype, the Board has considered the 
risks identified in the Guidelines (i.e., risks to the Reserve Banks, 
to the overall payment system, to financial stability, to the overall 
economy as a result of illicit activities, and to the implementation of 
monetary policy). In addition, the Board considered features that could 
limit Payment Accounts' impact on the Federal Reserve's balance sheet. 
As explained further below, Payment Accounts would be subject to a 
common set of risk-mitigating features. For example, to reduce credit 
risk to the Reserve Banks, a Payment Account holder would only have 
access to Federal Reserve payment services that have automated controls 
to prevent the accountholder from incurring an overdraft. In addition, 
a Payment Account holder would not be eligible for discount window 
access. The Reserve Banks would retain their discretion to impose 
additional restrictions and risk controls on a Payment Account on a 
case-by-case basis.
    A Payment Account would be separate and distinct from a full-
service Reserve Bank master account (Master Account).\4\ If the Federal 
Reserve decides that the Reserve Banks will offer a Payment Account, 
the Board would propose necessary changes to existing guidance and 
regulations, including the Guidelines and Regulation D.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Some of the Payment Account features and risk controls could 
be the same as utilized for a Master Account and are included in 
this document for completeness.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Payment Account Term Sheet

A. Account Description

    a. A Payment Account would be a special purpose account with a 
Reserve Bank that holds limited overnight balances of a legally-
eligible institution for the express purpose of clearing and settling 
the institution's payments.\5\ The Reserve Bank would permit a Payment 
Account holder to maintain only a limited balance in the account at the 
close of business; these end-of-day balances would be intended only to 
provide liquidity for payment activity at the beginning of the next 
business day. A Payment Account would be a separate and distinct type 
of account from a Reserve Bank master account (a Master Account), which 
generally does not have a limit imposed on overnight 
balances.<SUP>6 7</SUP> The Board would explore reporting the balances 
maintained in Payment Accounts separate from balances maintained in 
Master Accounts on the Reserve Banks' financial reporting. The Reserve 
Banks would retain their discretion to impose additional restrictions 
and risk controls on a Payment Account on a case-by-case basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ A Payment Account would be technology-agnostic and would not 
be designed to promote any particular payment product or service.
    \6\ As with existing Master Accounts, overnight overdrafts would 
not be permitted in Payment Accounts.
    \7\ A Payment Account would be a separate and distinct type of 
account from a Reserve Bank Joint Account.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Eligibility

    a. Any institution that satisfies the legal eligibility 
requirements for an account under the Federal Reserve Act would be 
eligible to request a Payment Account. Generally, institutions would be 
limited to maintaining one account with a Reserve Bank, either a 
Payment Account or a Master Account.\8\ The Payment Account prototype 
would not make any changes to legal eligibility for access to accounts 
and services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ A Payment Account holder would not be eligible to be a 
participant in an Excess Balance Account.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Overnight Balance Limit

    a. A Payment Account would be subject to an overnight balance 
limit, meaning that a Payment Account holder would need to reduce the 
balance of the account below a specified limit at the Federal Reserve's 
close of business.\9\ During the Federal Reserve business day, a 
Payment Account holder would be allowed to maintain a balance in a 
Payment Account above the overnight limit to fund payments settling in 
the account. The Reserve Banks would establish a compliance program to 
enforce the overnight balance limit, which could include, among other 
options, counseling, penalty fees, and service restrictions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ The business day of Federal Reserve Financial Services is 
defined in the Federal Reserve Policy on Payment System Risk and 
begins immediately after the close of business of the Fedwire Funds 
Service on days when the Fedwire Funds Service is open and the close 
of the FedNow Service on all other days (which, in both cases, is 
generally 7:00 p.m. ET).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    i. The Board is considering setting the overnight balance limit at 
the lesser of $500 million or 10% of the Payment Account holder's total 
assets.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The institution's total assets would be determined by its 
most recent report to its primary banking regulator or equivalent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ii. The Reserve Bank could have the ability to adjust the overnight 
balance limit, temporarily or permanently, on a

[[Page 60098]]

case-by-case basis. In some cases, the Reserve Bank would be expected 
to consult with the Board on such an adjustment.
    b. As noted above, a Payment Account would be designed only to 
facilitate the clearing and settlement of the Payment Account holder's 
payment activity, and this feature would be intended to encourage a 
Payment Account holder to limit overnight balances in their account.

D. No Interest on Overnight Balances

    a. A Payment Account holder would not receive interest on balances 
held at a Reserve Bank.
    b. As noted above, a Payment Account would be designed only to 
facilitate the clearing and settlement of the Payment Account holder's 
payment activity. This feature, along with the overnight balance limit, 
would be intended to encourage a Payment Account holder to limit 
overnight balances in their account.

E. No Access to the Discount Window

    a. A Payment Account holder would not be permitted to access credit 
from the discount window.
    b. This feature would be intended to reduce the credit risk that a 
Payment Account holder could pose to the Reserve Bank.

F. No Access to Reserve Bank Intraday Credit

    a. A Reserve Bank provides intraday credit, also known as a 
daylight overdraft, when an institution's Federal Reserve account is in 
a negative position during the business day. An institution with a 
Payment Account would not be permitted to incur daylight overdrafts. 
Payments would need to be prefunded and as noted below, payments that 
would cause an overdraft in a Payment Account would be rejected.
    b. This feature would be intended to reduce the credit risk that a 
Payment Account could pose to the Reserve Bank.

G. Services Available

    a. The following services (collectively, the permitted services) 
would be available for an institution to request to settle in a Payment 
Account: \11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ A description of the Federal Reserve payment services is 
available at <a href="http://www.frbservices.org">www.frbservices.org</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    i. The Fedwire[supreg] Funds Service;
    ii. The National Settlement Service;
    iii. The FedNow[supreg] Service; and
    iv. The Fedwire[supreg] Securities Service for Free Transfers 
only.<SUP>12 13</SUP>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ Free Transfers, as defined in the Reserve Banks' Operating 
Circular 7 (Fedwire Securities Service), are transfers of securities 
that do not result in a debit or a credit to a Master Account other 
than a transaction fee. Free transfers are commonly referred to as 
transfers free of payment.
    \13\ ``Fedwire'' and ``FedNow'' are service marks of the Federal 
Reserve Banks. A list of marks related to financial services 
products that are offered to financial institutions by the Federal 
Reserve Banks is available at <a href="https://www.frbservices.org">https://www.frbservices.org</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    b. This feature would be intended to reduce the credit risk that a 
Payment Account could pose to the Reserve Bank. Limiting Payment 
Accounts to these services would reduce credit risk to the Reserve 
Banks since each of these services have automated solutions that can 
reject transactions that would cause daylight overdrafts. As noted 
above, Payment Account holders would not be permitted to incur daylight 
overdrafts.

H. Services Not Available

    a. Any services not listed above (collectively, the excluded 
services) would not be available in connection with a Payment Account, 
including:
    i. FedACH[supreg] Services;
    ii. Check Services;
    iii. FedCash[supreg]; and
    iv. The Fedwire[supreg] Securities Service for Transfer Against 
Payment.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ Transfer Against Payment, as defined in the Reserve Banks' 
Operating Circular 7 (Fedwire Securities Service), is a transfer 
that is affected with a credit to the account of the sender and a 
debit to the account of the receiver for the amount of the payment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    b. This feature would be intended to reduce the credit risk that a 
Payment Account could pose to the Reserve Bank. These services would 
not be available because they do not currently have automated solutions 
that can reject transactions that would cause daylight overdrafts. As 
noted above, Payment Account holders would not be permitted to incur 
daylight overdrafts.

I. Account Usage Restrictions

    a. A Payment Account would be designed as a special purpose account 
for the express purpose of clearing and settling the institution's 
payment activity. Accordingly, a Payment Account holder would not be 
permitted to act as a correspondent bank, and a Payment Account could 
not be used to settle transactions for respondent institutions.\15\ 
This feature would be intended to reduce the range of risks a Payment 
Account could pose to the Reserve Bank and the overall payment system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ A Correspondent is a financial institution: (1) that has 
authorized a Reserve Bank to settle Debit and Credit Transaction 
Activity to its Master Account for a Respondent or for any financial 
institution for which the Respondent acts as Correspondent; or (2) 
that maintains required reserve balances for one or more financial 
institutions in its Master Account. See Section 2.2 of Operating 
Circular (OC) 1. A Respondent is: (1) a financial institution that 
settles Debit and Credit Transaction Activity for some or all its 
Reserve Bank transactions in the Master Account of a Correspondent; 
or (2) a financial institution that maintains its required reserve 
balances in the Master Account of a Correspondent. See Section 2.2 
of OC 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    b. In addition, consistent with the Reserve Banks' current practice 
for Master Accounts, the Reserve Banks would not recognize third-party 
interests in Payment Accounts. Like Master Account balances, the 
Reserve Banks would treat all balances in a Payment Account solely as 
obligations to the account holder.

J. Other Risk Controls

    a. In addition to the foregoing risk mitigants, the Reserve Banks 
would apply the following risk controls to a Payment Account: \16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ Some of these risk controls may also apply to Master 
Accounts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    i. Outgoing transactions that would result in an overdraft in the 
account would be rejected. This feature is intended to reduce the 
potential credit risk a Payment Account could pose to the Reserve Bank. 
As noted above, Payment Account holders would not be permitted to incur 
daylight overdrafts.
    b. The Board is exploring additional risk controls and conditions 
for a Payment Account. These controls could take the form of, among 
other things, account agreement conditions, attestation requirements, 
consent to reviews, or periodic reporting requirements. These controls 
could cover areas of risks to the Reserve Bank and payment system (such 
as operational or cyber risks), or risks associated with illicit 
financing (such as Anti-Money Laundering (AML) risk mitigation).

K. Payment Account Request Process

    a. An eligible institution would request a Payment Account from the 
relevant Reserve Bank. The relevant Reserve Bank would have the 
discretion to approve or deny the request. Similar to requests for 
Master Accounts, Reserve Banks would be expected to review a request 
for a Payment Account under the Guidelines.
    b. Consistent with a Payment Account's lower risk profile, the 
Board anticipates that a request for a Payment Account would generally 
receive a more streamlined review than a request for a Master Account 
from a comparable institution. As a result, a Reserve Bank would 
generally be expected to complete its review of an institution's 
request for a Payment Account within 90 calendar days of receiving all 
documentation requested by the Reserve Bank.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ Additional due diligence may be required in some 
circumstances, which could require a moderate amount of additional 
time for the Reserve Bank to review the request, and the Reserve 
Bank would be expected to consult with the Board on such an 
adjustment. The Board may set a limit on the additional review time. 
Thus, the 90-day review might be extended in some cases.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 60099]]

    c. As noted above, the Reserve Banks would retain their discretion 
to impose additional restrictions and risk controls on a Payment 
Account on a case-by-case basis.

IV. Request for Information

    The Board requests public input on all aspects of the Payment 
Account prototype, and in particular the Board seeks responses to the 
following questions:
    1. Would the design of the Payment Account prototype support 
payment activities of eligible institutions?
    2. What payment activities or use cases would a Payment Account 
best facilitate (or be unable to facilitate)?
    3. What barriers to innovation in payments would a Payment Account 
eliminate or alleviate?
    4. Would the design of the Payment Account prototype potentially 
increase the range of risks to the payment system identified in the 
Guidelines? If so, in what ways?
    5. What are the benefits and challenges of imposing an overnight 
balance limit on a Payment Account? Are there adjustments to the 
proposed formula for setting the balance limit that the Board should 
consider if it decides to establish a Payment Account?
    6. What are the benefits and drawbacks of paying no interest on 
overnight balances in a Payment Account?
    7. How might the Federal Reserve condition access to a Payment 
Account on the applicant having an acceptable AML, Bank Secrecy Act 
(BSA) and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) compliance 
programs and, more generally, how can the Federal Reserve best 
constrain AML/BSA/CFT risks associated with a Payment Account?
    8. Are there additional features or limits that the Board should 
consider in the design of the Payment Account prototype?

    By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.
Benjamin W. McDonough,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2025-23712 Filed 12-22-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on December 23, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.