Mobile Access Equipment and Subassemblies Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2022
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that countervailable subsidies were provided to Zhejiang Dingli Machinery Co., Ltd. (Dingli), and its cross-owned affiliates, a producer and exporter of mobile access equipment and subassemblies thereof (MAE) from the People's Republic of China (China). The period of review (POR) is January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 242 (Friday, December 19, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 242 (Friday, December 19, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59492-59493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-23429]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-570-140]
Mobile Access Equipment and Subassemblies Thereof From the
People's Republic of China: Final Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review; 2022
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that
countervailable subsidies were provided to Zhejiang Dingli Machinery
Co., Ltd. (Dingli), and its cross-owned affiliates, a producer and
exporter of mobile access equipment and subassemblies thereof (MAE)
from the People's Republic of China (China). The period of review (POR)
is January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022.
DATES: Applicable December 19, 2025.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Senoyuit, AD/CVD Operations,
Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6106.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 11, 2025, Commerce published in the Federal Register the
Preliminary Results and invited interested parties to comment.\1\ On
August 1, 2025, Commerce extended the deadline to issue its final
results for this review by 60 days to no later than October 8, 2025.\2\
Due to the lapse in appropriations and Federal Government shutdown, on
November 14, 2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative
proceedings by 47 days.\3\ Additionally, due to a backlog of documents
that were electronically filed via Enforcement and Compliance's
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System (ACCESS) during the Federal Government shutdown, on November 24,
2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative proceedings by an
additional 21 days.\4\ Accordingly, the deadline for these final
results is now December 15, 2025. For a complete description of the
events that followed the initiation of this review, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Mobile Access Equipment and Subassemblies Thereof from
the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Rescission,
in Part, of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2022, 90
FR 15443 (April 11, 2025) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Final Results of
2022 Countervailing Duty Administrative Review'' dated August 1,
2025.
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the
Federal Government,'' dated November 14, 2025.
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of all Case Deadlines,'' dated
November 24, 2025.
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results in the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of
Mobile Access Equipment and Subassemblies Thereof from the People's
Republic of China; 2022,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order <SUP>6</SUP>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Certain Mobile Access Equipment and Subassemblies
Thereof from the People's Republic of China: Countervailing Duty
Order and Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination, 86 FR 70439 (December 10, 2021) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The products covered by the Order are MAE from China. For a
complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
Analysis of Subsidy Programs and Comments Received
A list of the issues that parties raised, to which we responded in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum, is included as an appendix to this
notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is
on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our review and analysis of comments received from parties,
for these final results, we made certain changes to the countervailable
subsidy rate calculations for Dingli. For a discussion of these
changes, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each
of the subsidy programs found countervailable, we find that there is a
subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution by a government or public
entity that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the
subsidy is specific.\7\ For a full description of the methodology
underlying our conclusions, including
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding
benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 59493]]
our reliance, in part, on facts otherwise available with adverse
inferences pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act, see the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Final Results of Administrative Review
Commerce determines that the following estimated countervailable
subsidy rates exist for the period, January 1, 2022, through December
31, 2022:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ As discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, and
unchanged in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, Commerce has found
the following companies to be cross-owned with Dingli: Zhejiang
Green Power Machinery Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang Shengda Fenghe Automotive
Equipment Co., Ltd.; and Zhejiang Xieheng Intelligent Equipment Co.,
Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidy rate (percent
Company ad valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zhejiang Dingli Machinery Co. Ltd.; Zhejiang 32.26
Green Power Machinery Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang
Shengda Fenghe Automotive Equipment Co., Ltd.;
Zhejiang Xieheng Intelligent Equipment Co.,
Ltd.\8\.......................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose its calculations and analysis
performed for the final results of review within five days after the
date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(2), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, countervailing duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of
this review, for the above-listed companies at the applicable ad
valorem assessment rates. We intend to issue assessment instructions to
CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of these
final results of review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is
filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment
instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until
the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has
expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, Commerce also
intends to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated
countervailing duties in the amounts shown for each of the respective
companies listed above on shipments of subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of
publication of the final results of this administrative review.\9\ For
all non-reviewed firms subject to the Order, we will instruct CBP to
continue to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at
the most recent company-specific or all-others rate applicable to the
company, as appropriate. These cash deposit requirements, effective
upon publication of these final results, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See, e.g., Honey from Argentina: Results of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review, 69 FR 29518 (May 24, 2004), and
accompanying IDM at Comment 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administrative Protective Order (APO)
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to an APO
of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these final results in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5).
Dated: December 15, 2025.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Changes Since the Preliminary Determination
IV. Calculation of the All-Others Rate
V. Subsidies Valuation Information
VI. Benchmarks
VII. Analysis of Programs
VIII. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Apply Adverse Facts Available
(AFA) to the Government of China (GOC) for the MAE for More than
Adequate Remuneration (MTAR) Program
Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Revise its Decision to
Countervail the Inputs for Less-Than-Adequate Remuneration (LTAR)
Based on AFA
Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Revise its Decision to
Countervail the Electricity for LTAR Based on AFA
Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should Revise its Decision to
Countervail the Provision of Land Use for LTAR Based on AFA
Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should Continue to Countervail the
GOC's Provision of Other Subsidies
Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should Modify our Benchmark for the
MAE for MTAR program
Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should Change the Harmonized System
(HS) Subheadings for Provision of Hot-Rolled Steel (HRS) for LTAR
Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should Change the HS Subheadings for
Hollow Structural Shapes (HHS) for LTAR
Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should Revise the Benchmark for
Provision of Electric Motors for LTAR
Comment 10: Whether Commerce Should Revise Its Finding for
Purchases of Diesel Engines for LTAR
Comment 11: Whether Commerce Should Revise the Benchmark for
Hydraulic Oil LTAR
Comment 12: Whether Commerce Should Revise the Benchmark for
Provision of General Ocean Freight for LTAR
Comment 13: Whether Commerce Should Revise the Benchmark for
Inland Freight
Comment 14: Whether Commerce Should Correct Apparent Errors in
Dingli's Reported Input Purchases
IX. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2025-23429 Filed 12-18-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.