Notice2025-21509

Proposed Aggregate Production Quotas for Schedule I and II Controlled Substances and Assessment of Annual Needs for the List I Chemicals Ephedrine, Pseudoephedrine, and Phenylpropanolamine for 2026

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
November 28, 2025

Issuing agencies

Justice DepartmentDrug Enforcement Administration

Abstract

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) proposes to establish the 2026 aggregate production quotas for controlled substances in schedules I and II of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and the assessment of annual needs for the list I chemicals ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 227 (Friday, November 28, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 227 (Friday, November 28, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54745-54760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-21509]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-1568P]


Proposed Aggregate Production Quotas for Schedule I and II 
Controlled Substances and Assessment of Annual Needs for the List I 
Chemicals Ephedrine, Pseudoephedrine, and Phenylpropanolamine for 2026

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice.

ACTION: Notice with request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) proposes to 
establish the 2026 aggregate production quotas for controlled 
substances in schedules I and II of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) 
and the assessment of annual needs for the list I chemicals ephedrine, 
pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine.

DATES: Interested persons may file written comments on this notice in 
accordance with 21 CFR 1303.11(c) and 1315.11(d). Electronic comments 
must be submitted, and written comments must be postmarked, on or 
before December 15, 2025. Commenters should be aware that the 
electronic Federal Docket Management System will not accept comments 
after 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the last day of the comment period.
    Based on comments received in response to this notice, the 
Administrator may hold a public hearing on one or more issues raised. 
In the event the Administrator decides in his sole discretion to hold 
such a hearing, the Administrator will publish a notice of any such 
hearing in the Federal Register. After consideration of any comments or 
objections, or after a hearing, if one is held, the Administrator will 
publish in the Federal Register a final order establishing the 2026 
aggregate production quotas for schedule I and II controlled 
substances, and an assessment of annual needs for the list I chemicals 
ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine.

ADDRESSES: To ensure proper handling of comments, please reference 
``Docket No. 1568P'' on all correspondence, including any attachments. 
DEA encourages that all comments be submitted electronically through 
the Federal eRulemaking Portal, which provides the ability to type 
short comments directly into the comment field on the web page or 
attach a file for lengthier comments. Please go to <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> and follow the online instructions at that site for 
submitting comments. Upon completion of your submission, you will 
receive a Comment Tracking Number for your comment.
    Please be aware that submitted comments are not instantaneously 
available for public view on <a href="http://Regulations.gov">Regulations.gov</a>. If you have received a 
Comment Tracking Number, your comment has been successfully submitted, 
and there is no need to resubmit the same comment. Paper comments that 
duplicate electronic submissions are not necessary and are discouraged. 
Should you wish to mail a paper comment in lieu of an electronic 
comment, it should be sent via regular or express mail to: Drug 
Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register 
Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 
22152.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather E. Achbach, Regulatory 
Drafting and Policy Support Section, Diversion Control Division, Drug 
Enforcement Administration; Mailing Address: 8701 Morrissette Drive, 
Springfield, Virginia 22152, Telephone: (571) 776-3882.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

[[Page 54746]]

Posting of Public Comments

    Please note that all comments received in response to this docket 
are considered part of the public record. They will, unless reasonable 
cause is given, be made available by the Drug Enforcement 
Administration (DEA) for public inspection online at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>. Such information includes personal identifying 
information (such as your name, address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by 
the commenter.
    The Freedom of Information Act applies to all comments received. If 
you want to submit personal identifying information (such as your name, 
address, etc.) as part of your comment, but do not want it to be made 
publicly available, you must include the phrase ``PERSONAL IDENTIFYING 
INFORMATION'' in the first paragraph of your comment. You must also 
place all the personal identifying information you do not want made 
publicly available in the first paragraph of your comment and identify 
what information you want redacted.
    If you want to submit confidential business information as part of 
your comment, but do not want it to be made publicly available, you 
must include the phrase ``CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION'' in the 
first paragraph of your comment. You must also prominently identify 
confidential business information to be redacted within the comment.
    Comments containing personal identifying information or 
confidential business information identified and located as directed 
above will generally be made available in redacted form. If a comment 
contains so much confidential business information or personal 
identifying information that it cannot be effectively redacted, all or 
part of that comment may not be made publicly available. Comments 
posted to <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> may include any personal 
identifying information (such as name, address, and phone number) 
included in the text of your electronic submission that is not 
identified as directed above as confidential.
    An electronic copy of this document is available at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> for easy reference.

Legal Authority

    Section 306 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 826) 
requires the Attorney General to establish production quotas for each 
basic class of controlled substances listed in schedules I and II, and 
for the list I chemicals ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and 
phenylpropanolamine. The Attorney General has delegated this function 
to the Administrator of DEA pursuant to 28 CFR 0.100.

Analysis for Proposed 2026 Aggregate Production Quotas and Assessment 
of Annual Needs

    The proposed 2026 aggregate production quotas (APQ) and assessment 
of annual needs (AAN) represent those quantities of schedule I and II 
controlled substances, and the list I chemicals ephedrine, 
pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine, to be manufactured in the 
United States in 2026 to provide for the estimated medical, scientific, 
research, and industrial needs of the United States, lawful export 
requirements, and the establishment and maintenance of reserve stocks. 
These quotas include imports of ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and 
phenylpropanolamine, but do not include imports of controlled 
substances for use in industrial processes.

Aggregate Production Quotas

    In determining the proposed 2026 APQ, the Administrator has taken 
into account the criteria of 21 U.S.C. 826(a) and 21 CFR 1303.11, 
including the following seven factors:
    (1) Total net disposal of the class by all manufacturers during the 
current and two preceding years;
    (2) Trends in the national rate of net disposal of the class;
    (3) Total actual (or estimated) inventories of the class and of all 
substances manufactured from the class, and trends in inventory 
accumulation;
    (4) Projected demand for such class as indicated by procurement 
quotas requested pursuant to [21 CFR] 1303.12;
    (5) The extent of any diversion of the controlled substance in the 
class;
    (6) Relevant information obtained from the Department of Health and 
Human Services (HHS), including from the Food and Drug Administration 
(FDA), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the 
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and relevant 
information obtained from the states; and
    (7) Other factors affecting medical, scientific, research, and 
industrial needs in the United States and lawful export requirements, 
as the Administrator finds relevant, including changes in the currently 
accepted medical use in treatment with the class or the substances 
manufactured from it, the economic and physical availability of raw 
materials for use in manufacturing and for inventory purposes, yield 
and stability problems, potential disruptions to production (including 
possible labor strikes), and recent unforeseen emergencies such as 
floods and fires.
21 CFR 1303.11(b).
    DEA formally solicited data from the HHS agency FDA in March 2025 
and from the states in April 2025, pursuant to 21 CFR part 1303. DEA 
did not solicit input from CMS for reasons discussed in previous 
notices.\1\ While DEA is requesting data from CDC, this request has 
been inadvertently delayed. Data received from the CDC that is relevant 
to the 2026 APQs will be considered in finalizing and/or adjusting the 
APQs. DEA requested information on trends in the legitimate use of 
select schedule I and II controlled substances from FDA. DEA's request 
for information from the states was made directly to the Prescription 
Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) Administrators in each state as well as 
through the National Association of State Controlled Substances 
Authorities (NASCSA).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Proposed Adjustments to the Aggregate Production Quotas for 
Schedule I and II Controlled Substances and Assessment of Annual 
Needs for List I Chemicals Ephedrine, Pseudoephedrine, and 
Phenylpropanolamine for 2020, 85 FR 54414 (Sept. 1, 2020) and 
Proposed Aggregate Production Quotas for Schedule I and II 
Controlled Substances and Assessment of Annual Needs for List I 
Chemicals Ephedrine, Pseudoephedrine, and Phenylpropanolamine for 
2021, 85 FR 54407 (Sept. 1, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment of Annual Needs

    In similar fashion, in determining the proposed 2026 AAN for the 
list I chemicals ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine, 
the Administrator has taken into account the criteria of 21 U.S.C. 
826(a) and 21 CFR 1315.11, including the following five factors:
    (1) Total net disposal of the chemical by all manufacturers and 
importers during the current and two preceding years;
    (2) Trends in the national rate of net disposal of each chemical;
    (3) Total actual (or estimated) inventories of the chemical and of 
all substances manufactured from the chemical, and trends in inventory 
accumulation;
    (4) Projected demand for each chemical as indicated by procurement 
and import quotas requested pursuant to [21 CFR] 1315.32; and
    (5) Other factors affecting medical, scientific, research, and 
industrial needs in the United States, lawful export requirements, and 
the establishment and maintenance of reserve stocks, as the 
Administrator finds relevant, including changes in the currently 
accepted medical use in treatment with the chemicals or the substances

[[Page 54747]]

manufactured from them, the economic and physical availability of raw 
materials for use in manufacturing and for inventory purposes, yield 
and stability problems, potential disruptions to production (including 
possible labor strikes), and recent unforeseen emergencies such as 
floods and fires.
21 CFR 1315.11(b).
    In determining the proposed 2026 AAN, DEA used the calculation 
methodology previously described in the 2010 and 2011 assessments of 
annual needs (74 FR 60294 (Nov. 20, 2009) and 75 FR 79407 (Dec. 20, 
2010), respectively).

Estimates of Medical Need for Schedule II Opioids and Stimulants

    In accordance with 21 CFR part 1303, 21 U.S.C. 826, and 42 U.S.C. 
242, HHS continues to provide DEA with estimates of the quantities of 
select schedule I and II controlled substances and three list I 
chemicals that will be required to meet the legitimate medical needs of 
the United States for a given calendar year. The responsibility to 
provide these estimates of legitimate domestic medical needs resides 
with FDA. FDA provides DEA with predicted estimates of domestic medical 
usage for selected controlled substances based on information available 
to them at a specific point in time in order to meet statutory 
requirements. In July 2025, FDA provided DEA with the predicted 
estimates of domestic medical usage for selected controlled substances 
for 2026, which DEA considered in developing the proposed 2026 APQ.
    DEA observed an average of a 10.56 percent decrease in the medical 
usage of the schedule II opioids codeine, morphine, fentanyl, 
hydrocodone, hydromorphone, oxycodone and oxymorphone for the United 
States in 2024 compared to 2023. DEA projects that the medical usage of 
these controlled substances will continue to decline in 2026 based on a 
review of domestic usage data from IQVIA. DEA also considered the 
potential for diversion of these opioids, as required by 21 CFR 
1303.11(b)(5). Additionally, DEA has observed a significant decline in 
requests for product development quotas to support manufacturing 
towards FDA approval of drug products containing oxycodone. 
Accordingly, the APQs for codeine (for sale), morphine (for sale), 
fentanyl, hydrocodone (for sale), hydromorphone, oxycodone (for sale), 
and oxymorphone (for sale) are being proposed as reductions from their 
2025 established APQ value.
    DEA is proposing a slight increase to the remifentanil APQ from the 
2025 established APQ. Remifentanil is a schedule II synthetic opioid 
analgesic that is primarily administered intravenously to manage pain 
during and after surgical procedures. DEA reviewed the most recently 
available domestic usage data from IQVIA and export data from DEA's 
internal database. Domestic medical usage of remifentanil has been 
increasing every year since 2020. Additionally, exports of this active 
pharmaceutical ingredient (API) have also increased from 2022 to 2024. 
Thus, DEA is proposing a higher APQ of remifentanil for 2026 than DEA 
initially established for 2025, to support increasing domestic medical 
use and export requirements.
    DEA is also proposing an increase to the noroxymorphone (for sale) 
APQ from the 2025 established APQ to accommodate a manufacturer's 
request to manufacture reference standards, and to evaluate and 
identify unknown impurities in the manufacturing process. This 
additional APQ will also accommodate the manufacturer's need to conduct 
additional product development manufacturing activities to optimize the 
synthesis of noroxymorphone (for sale).
    DEA observed an average of a 6.74 percent increase in domestic 
medical use of the schedule II stimulants amphetamine, methylphenidate 
(including dexmethylphenidate), and lisdexamfetamine in 2024 compared 
to 2023. Medications containing one of these controlled substances are 
commonly prescribed to treat patients with attention deficit 
hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). In 2025, dosage form manufacturers 
reported shortages of specific ADHD medications containing amphetamine, 
lisdexamfetamine, and methylphenidate to FDA. The stated reasons for 
these specific shortages include increases in product demand, supply 
chain issues, manufacturing and quality issues, lack of active 
ingredients, and business decisions of manufacturers. DEA considered 
drug shortage concerns when determining the proposed APQs for these 
substances.
    In proposing the APQs for d-amphetamine (for sale), d,l-
amphetamine, and methylphenidate, DEA considered manufacturers' 
reported inventories for amphetamine and methylphenidate-based products 
and determined that the 2026 APQs should be proposed at their 2025 
adjusted APQ levels. DEA believes the inventories, when combined with 
the proposed 2026 APQs, will be sufficient to support the estimated 
increases in domestic medical use and export requirements of 
amphetamine and methylphenidate-based products.
    With respect to lisdexamfetamine, DEA is proposing an increase from 
the 2025 established lisdexamfetamine APQ to address increased 
prescribing, export requirements, and to ensure sufficient inventory 
for domestic manufacturers of FDA-approved lisdexamfetamine drug 
products. DEA recognizes that global consumption is increasing with 
almost 30 countries approving the use of lisdexamfetamine drug products 
to treat specific medical conditions. DEA reviewed the most recently 
available domestic usage data from IQVIA and export data from DEA's 
internal database and Multi International Data Analysis System (MIDAS). 
Extrapolation of the data predicts domestic use will increase 8.94 
percent and export requirements will increase 14.85 percent in 2026. 
This double-digit increase in export requirements follows from the 
brand name product, Vyvanse, successfully being approved to treat 
patients suffering from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) 
in 29 countries in addition to the United States. Furthermore, Vyvanse 
is expected to launch in additional foreign countries between 2025 and 
2027. Additional U.S. dosage form manufacturers have also begun 
exporting lisdexamfetamine finished dosage-form products according to 
the data extracted from DEA's internal databases. Reviewing internal 
databases, DEA determined that bulk manufacturers started 2025 with 
less than the 40% inventory allowance permitted by 21 CFR 1303.24. 
Increasing the lisdexamfetamine APQ in 2026 would allow the 
manufacturers to maintain the 40% inventory allowance permitted by 21 
CFR 1303.24 while meeting the estimated increasing legitimate domestic 
and global demands. Thus, DEA is proposing a higher lisdexamfetamine 
APQ for 2026 than DEA initially established for 2025.
    DEA is also proposing a corresponding increase to the APQ of d-
amphetamine (for conversion) over the 2025 level. The synthesis route 
to manufacture lisdexamfetamine requires the manufacturing of a 
controlled substance intermediate, d-amphetamine (for conversion). In 
most synthesis pathways, lisdexamfetamine cannot be manufactured 
without synthesizing d-amphetamine (for conversion) as an intermediate 
step, thus the APQ of d-amphetamine (for conversion) is proposed to 
increase commensurately to the lisdexamfetamine APQ increase.

DEA Projected Trends for Certain Schedule I Controlled Substances

    DEA is proposing a higher APQ than the 2025 established APQs for 
the

[[Page 54748]]

following schedule I controlled substances: 3,4-methylenedioxy-N-
methylcathinone, 5-methyoxy-N-N-dimethyltryptamine, psilocybin and 
psilocyn to support manufacturing activities related to the increased 
level of research and clinical trials. Research and clinical trials are 
being conducted with these substances for potential treatment of 
conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and 
depression.

Information Received for Consideration of the Remaining Factors

    For the factors listed in 21 CFR 1303.11(b)(3) and (4), DEA 
registered manufacturers of controlled substances in schedules I and II 
provide information such as inventory, distribution, manufacturing, 
sales forecasts and quota requests to DEA database systems. See 21 CFR 
1303.12, 1303.22, and part 1304.
    The regulation at 21 CFR 1303.11(b)(5) requires DEA to consider the 
extent of diversion of controlled substances.\2\ Diversion is defined 
as all distribution, dispensing, or other use of controlled substances 
for other than legitimate medical purposes. In order to consider the 
extent of diversion, DEA analyzed reports of diversion of controlled 
substances from 2024 submitted to its Theft Loss Report database. This 
database is comprised of DEA registrant reports documenting diversion 
from the legitimate distribution chain, including employee thefts, 
break-ins, armed robberies, and material lost in transit. The data was 
categorized by basic drug class, and the amount of active 
pharmaceutical ingredient (API) in the dosage form was delineated with 
an appropriate metric for use in proposing aggregate production quota 
values (i.e., weight).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The estimates of diversion for five ``covered controlled 
substances'' as required by 21 U.S.C. 826(i) are discussed later in 
the document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Estimates of Diversion of Covered Controlled Substances

    In establishing any quota . . . , or any procurement quota 
established by [DEA] by regulation, for fentanyl, oxycodone, 
hydrocodone, oxymorphone, or hydromorphone (in this subsection 
referred to as a ``covered controlled substance''), [DEA] shall 
estimate the amount of diversion of the covered controlled substance 
that occurs in the United States.

21 U.S.C. 826(i)(1)(A).
    In estimating diversion under that provision, DEA:

    (i) shall consider information . . . , in consultation with the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services, [it] determines reliable on 
rates of overdose deaths and abuse and overall public health impact 
related to the covered controlled substance in the United States; 
and
    (ii) may take into consideration whatever other sources of 
information [it] determines reliable.

21 U.S.C. 826(i)(1)(B).
    The statute further mandates that DEA ``make appropriate quota 
reductions, as determined by [DEA], from the quota [it] would have 
otherwise established had such diversion not been considered.'' \3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 21 U.S.C. 826(i)(1)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In estimating the amount of diversion of each covered controlled 
substance that occurs in the United States, DEA considered information 
from state PDMP Administrators and from legitimate distribution chain 
participants.

Consideration of Information From Certain State PDMPs and From National 
Sales Data

    Pursuant to 21 CFR 1303.11(b)(6), DEA requested state PDMP data for 
the purpose of establishing its APQ. DEA believes state PDMPs to be an 
essential, reliable source of information for use in effectively 
estimating diversion of the five covered controlled substances. In 
April 2025, DEA sent a letter to NASCSA requesting its assistance in 
obtaining aggregated PDMP data for the five covered controlled 
substances from each state covering the years 2022-2024. The letter 
indicated that DEA was specifically interested in an analysis of 
prescription data from each state's PDMP that would assist DEA in 
estimating diversion and setting appropriate quotas in compliance with 
21 U.S.C. 826(i). In its request, DEA provided specific questions, 
discussed in detail below, based on common indicia of potential 
diversion known as ``red flags'' by physicians, pharmacists, 
manufacturers, distributors, and federal and state regulatory and law 
enforcement agencies.\4\ DEA investigators and administrative 
prosecutors also rely on Agency case law in which these red flags of 
diversion have been upheld as indicia of potential diversion.\5\ 
Certain state regulations now include red flag circumstances as 
potential indicators of illegitimate prescriptions, and thus of 
potential abuse and diversion of controlled substances.\6\ See, e.g., 
The Pharmacy Place Order, 86 FR 21008, 21012 (Apr. 21, 2021) (citing 22 
Tex. Admin. Code 291.29(c)(4), specifying the geographical distance 
between the practitioner and the patient or between the pharmacy and 
the patient as a red flag).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ National Association of Boards of Pharmacy (NABP) coalition 
consensus document ``Stakeholders' Challenges and Red Flag Warning 
Signs Related to Prescribing and Dispensing Controlled Substances'' 
(2015). www.nabp.pharmacy/resources/reports.
    \5\ The Medicine Shoppe, 79 FR 59504, 59507, 59512-13 (Oct. 2, 
2014); Holiday CVS, L.L.C., d/b/a CVS Pharmacy Nos. 219 and 5195, 77 
FR 62316 (Oct. 12, 2012).
    \6\ The mere indicia of red flags alone is not proof of 
violation of 21 U.S.C. 824 or any other provision of the CSA. This 
rule discusses only their use by DEA as an analytical tool to 
estimate diversion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    DEA requested responses from state PDMP Administrators by June 15, 
2025. NASCSA disseminated DEA's request to its PDMP Administrators and 
provided them with a report tool to ensure that responses to DEA's 
questions were extracted consistently across all responsive states. 
Thirty-one states and three territories provided DEA with summarized 
PDMP data as of July 2025, utilizing the standardized report developed 
by NASCSA.\7\ See Table 1a below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ NASCSA formatted DEA's request into an analytics model 
developed by one of its associates, Appriss Inc.

    Table 1a--States/Territories That Responded to DEA's Data Request
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             State/territory
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Alabama.
2. Alaska.
3. Arizona.
4. Arkansas.
5. Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands.
6. Connecticut.
7. Delaware.
8. District of Columbia.
9. Idaho.
10. Indiana.
11. Iowa.
12. Kansas.
13. Kentucky.
14. Louisiana.
15. Maine.
16. Maryland.
17. Michigan.
18. Minnesota.
19. Mississippi.
20. Missouri.
21. Montana.
22. Nevada.
23. New Jersey.
24. New Mexico.
25. North Carolina.
26. Ohio.
27. Oregon.
28. Pennsylvania.
29. Puerto Rico.
30. South Carolina.
31. South Dakota.
32. Texas.
33. Utah.
34. Virginia.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pharmacies are required by state law to enter controlled substance 
dispensing data into the state's PDMP database, including the 
prescriber's name,

[[Page 54749]]

registered address and DEA number; prescription information (such as 
drug name); dispensing date; dosage dispensed; pharmacy registered 
address; and patient name and address. DEA considers PDMP data to be an 
accurate representation of dispensing activities in states. DEA 
received data for the following red-flag metrics:
    <bullet> The total number of patients who saw three or more 
prescribers in a 90-day period and were dispensed an opioid following 
each visit. For this metric, DEA requested and was provided the number 
of prescriptions for the five covered controlled substances dispensed 
to these patients, as a percentage of the total prescriptions dispensed 
for that particular covered controlled substance, as well as the 
corresponding quantity of the covered controlled substance dispensed. 
This metric (patients being prescribed covered controlled substances 
from three or more prescribers in a 90-day period) is used to identify 
potential doctor shopping, a common technique to obtain a high number 
of controlled substances, which may lead to abuse or diversion of 
controlled substances. DEA has long considered doctor shopping to be an 
indicator of potential diversion.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Frank's Corner Pharmacy, 60 FR 17574 (Apr. 6, 1995); Holiday 
CVS, L.L.C., d/b/a CVS Pharmacy Nos. 219 and 5195, 77 FR 62316 (Oct. 
12, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    <bullet> The number of patients that were dispensed prescriptions 
for each of the five covered controlled substances that exceeded 240 
morphine milligram equivalents (MME) daily. States provided the raw 
number of such prescriptions dispensed, the number of prescriptions as 
a percentage of the total covered controlled substance prescriptions 
dispensed, and the corresponding quantity of the covered controlled 
substance dispensed. DEA believes that accounting for quantities in 
excess of 240 MME daily allows for consideration of oncology patients 
with legitimate medical needs for covered controlled substance 
prescriptions with high MME. Higher dosages place individuals at higher 
risk of overdose and death. Prescriptions involving dosages exceeding 
240 MME daily may indicate diversion, such as illegal distribution of 
controlled substances or prescribing outside the usual course of 
professional practice.
    <bullet> The number of patients that paid cash for covered 
controlled substance prescriptions, without submitting for insurance 
reimbursement.\9\ States also provided the number of prescriptions paid 
entirely with cash as a percentage of the total prescriptions for the 
five covered controlled substances dispensed, as well as the 
corresponding quantity of the covered controlled substances dispensed. 
When investigating potential diversion, cash payments are one element 
considered in identifying prescriptions filled for nonmedical purposes. 
Unusually high percentages of cash payments made to a prescriber or 
pharmacy for controlled substances may indicate diversion.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ This total does not include insurance co-payments made with 
cash.
    \10\ Suntree Pharmacy and Suntree Medical Equipment, LLC, 85 FR 
73753 (Nov. 19, 2020) (finding that the pharmacy filled 
prescriptions despite the presence of multiple unresolved red flags, 
including cash payments); Pharmacy Doctors Enterprises d/b/a Zion 
Clinic Pharmacy, 83 FR 10876 (Mar. 13, 2018) (revoking pharmacy's 
registration for filling prescriptions that raised the red flag of 
customers paying cash for their prescriptions, among other red 
flags).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    DEA received PDMP data from the states in a standardized format 
that allowed DEA to aggregate the data. The PDMP data sample represents 
a population of approximately 112.35 million people, which is 
approximately 34 percent of the U.S. population. DEA believes this 
sample is sufficient to derive a reasonable nationwide estimate.
    While PDMP data is useful in estimating diversion, it is not 
conclusive. Further investigation would be required before concluding 
that any of the subject prescriptions were actually diverted. DEA 
continues to evaluate its methodologies in estimating diversion in an 
effort to set quotas more efficiently. State participation is crucial 
to accurate data analysis, and DEA anticipates working closely with 
states, as well as other federal and state entities, in future quota 
determinations.
    To calculate a national diversion estimate for each of the covered 
controlled substances from the responses received from state PDMP 
Administrators, DEA relied upon the number of individuals who received 
a prescription for a covered controlled substance that met any of the 
three red-flag metrics for each of calendar years 2022-2024. Using the 
population of the states responding to DEA's request, DEA then 
calculated the percentage of the population issued a prescription with 
a red flag. Using this estimated percentage for 2021-2024, DEA analyzed 
trends in the data to predict the estimated percentage of patients who 
would be expected to be included in these red-flag metrics for 2026.
    DEA also reviewed aggregate sales data for each of the covered 
controlled substances, which it extracted from IQVIA's National Sales 
Perspective.\11\ IQVIA sales data was selected to help quantify 
diversion at the national level because it reflects the best national 
estimate for all prescriptions written and filled, including the total 
quantity available for diversion or misuse. DEA analyzed trends in 
IQVIA sales data from January 2021--April 2025, in order to predict the 
estimated national sales for 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ DEA has purchased this data from IQVIA for decades and 
routinely uses this information to administer several regulatory 
functions, including the administration of DEA's quota program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To estimate diversion for each of the covered controlled 
substances, DEA multiplied the forecasted percentage of patients likely 
to receive a prescription for a covered controlled substance that meet 
any of the three red-flag metrics in 2026 by the forecasted sales data 
from IQVIA for 2026. The resulting estimate of diversion from data 
submitted by state PDMP Administrators is summarized below in Table 1b. 
This data contributed to the final diversion estimate set forth in 
Table 3.

   Table 1b--Diversion Estimates for 2026 Based on State PDMP Data for
              Covered Controlled Substances from 2022-2024.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Controlled substance                          (g)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fentanyl................................................              27
Hydrocodone.............................................         124,656
Hydromorphone...........................................             477
Oxycodone...............................................         302,819
Oxymorphone.............................................               0
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consideration of Registrant Reported Diversion in the Legitimate 
Distribution Chain

    DEA extracted data from its Theft Loss Report database and 
categorized it by each basic drug class. DEA calculated the estimated 
amount of diversion by multiplying the quantity of API in each finished 
dosage form by the total amount of units reported stolen or lost to 
estimate the metric weight in grams of the controlled substance being 
diverted. Additional data was provided by a DEA field office based on 
the conclusion of a regulatory inspection. In January 2025, DEA 
Diversion Investigators conducted an inspection at a DEA-registered 
pharmaceutical company and discovered a significant quantity of 
oxycodone medications missing from various production stages. DEA fined 
the company who surrendered their DEA registration license at the 
conclusion of the investigation. This estimate of diversion from the 
legitimate supply chain for each of the covered controlled substances 
is displayed in Table 2. This

[[Page 54750]]

data contributed to the final diversion estimates set forth in Table 3.

  Table 2--Diversion Estimates Based on Supply Chain Diversion Data for
                      Covered Controlled Substances
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Controlled substance                          (g)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fentanyl................................................              78
Hydrocodone.............................................          18,765
Hydromorphone...........................................           1,653
Oxycodone...............................................          43,978
Oxymorphone.............................................              97
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with 21 U.S.C. 826(i), DEA's estimate of diversion 
for the five controlled substances was calculated by combining the 
values in Tables 1b and 2.

 Table 3--Total Estimates of Diversion for Covered Controlled Substances
                    To Be Considered in the 2026 APQs
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Controlled substance                          (g)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fentanyl................................................             105
Hydrocodone.............................................         143,421
Hydromorphone...........................................           2,130
Oxycodone...............................................         346,797
Oxymorphone.............................................              97
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuing Efforts To Anticipate and Prevent Drug Shortages

    DEA remains committed to monitoring drug shortages, limiting their 
impact, and resolving them as quickly as possible. DEA continues to 
seek additional information that will assist in accurately forecasting 
domestic medical usage and export requirements of schedule I or II 
substances. In February 2024, DEA began utilizing IQVIA's foreign (non-
U.S.) sales tracking data module, MIDAS, which provides valuable 
insight into the growing export markets for schedule II stimulants. In 
March 2025, DEA sent a letter requesting approximately 700 DEA-
registered manufacturers and distributors to voluntarily switch their 
DEA ARCOS database reporting from a quarterly to monthly basis.
    On April 29, 2024, DEA announced to DEA-registered manufacturers 
that procurement quotas for the purpose of commercial manufacturing of 
schedule II-controlled substances will be allocated on a semi-annual 
basis, except that procurement quotas relating to injectable drug 
products will be allocated annually. In a continuing effort to prevent 
drug shortages and be more agile in its administration of the quota 
program, DEA will continue to administer applicable procurement quotas 
on a semi-annual basis. DEA remains committed to ensuring that all 
patients with legitimate medical need can access appropriately 
prescribed medications.
    The Administrator, therefore, proposes to establish the 2026 APQ 
for certain schedule I and II controlled substances and AAN for the 
list I chemicals ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine, 
expressed in grams of anhydrous acid or base, as follows:

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P

[[Page 54751]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28NO25.026


[[Page 54752]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28NO25.027


[[Page 54753]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28NO25.028


[[Page 54754]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28NO25.029


[[Page 54755]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28NO25.030


[[Page 54756]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28NO25.031


[[Page 54757]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28NO25.032


[[Page 54758]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28NO25.033


[[Page 54759]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28NO25.034

BILLING CODE 4410-09-C
    The Administrator further proposes that the APQ for all other 
schedule I and II controlled substances included in 21

[[Page 54760]]

CFR 1308.11 and 1308.12 remain at zero.
    These proposed 2026 quotas reflect the quantities that DEA believes 
are necessary to meet the estimated medical, scientific, research, and 
industrial needs of the United States, lawful export requirements; and 
the establishment and maintenance of reserve stocks.
    In accordance with 21 CFR 1303.13 and 1315.13, upon consideration 
of the relevant factors, the Administrator may adjust the 2026 APQ and 
AAN as needed.

Conclusion

    After consideration of any comments or objections, or after a 
hearing, if one is held, the Administrator will issue and publish in 
the Federal Register a final order establishing the 2026 APQ for 
controlled substances in schedules I and II and establishing an AAN for 
the list I chemicals ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and 
phenylpropanolamine, as directed by 21 CFR 1303.11(c) and 1315.11(f).

Signing Authority

    This document of the Drug Enforcement Administration was signed on 
November 25, 2025, by Administrator Terrance Cole. That document with 
the original signature and date is maintained by DEA. For 
administrative purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of 
the Office of the Federal Register, the undersigned DEA Federal 
Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to sign and submit the 
document in electronic format for publication, as an official document 
of DEA. This administrative process in no way alters the legal effect 
of this document upon publication in the Federal Register.

Heather Achbach,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, Drug Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2025-21509 Filed 11-25-25; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on November 28, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.