Notice2025-20693

Self-Regulatory Organizations; MEMX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Exchange's Fee Schedule Concerning Equities Transaction Pricing

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
November 24, 2025

Issuing agencies

Securities and Exchange Commission

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 224 (Monday, November 24, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 224 (Monday, November 24, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53023-53028]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-20693]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-104224; File No. SR-MEMX-2025-31]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; MEMX LLC; Notice of Filing and 
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the 
Exchange's Fee Schedule Concerning Equities Transaction Pricing

November 19, 2025.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that, on September 30, 2025, MEMX LLC (``MEMX'' or the ``Exchange'') 
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') 
the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, 
which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is 
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change 
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is filing with the Commission a proposed rule change 
to amend the Exchange's fee schedule applicable to Members \3\ (the 
``Fee Schedule'') pursuant to Exchange Rules 15.1(a) and (c). As is 
further described below, the Exchange proposes to (i) increase the base 
rebates for executions of orders that add non-displayed liquidity to 
the Exchange (such orders, ``Added Non-Displayed Volume'') in 
securities priced at or above $1.00 per share; (ii) increase the base 
rebates for executions of Added Non-Displayed Volume in securities 
priced below $1.00 per share (such orders, ``Added Non-Displayed Sub-
Dollar Volume''); (iii) increase the base rebates provided for 
executions of orders in securities priced below $1.00 per share that 
add displayed liquidity to the Exchange (such orders, ``Added Displayed 
Sub-Dollar Volume''); (iv) modify the Non-Display Add Tiers by 
eliminating Non-Display Add Tiers 2 and 3; (v) adopt new standard fees 
for executions of orders that remove liquidity from the Exchange (such 
orders, ``Removed Volume''), separated by Tapes A, B, and C; (vi) 
reduce the fee for executions of Retail Orders \4\ in securities priced 
at or above $1.00 per share that remove liquidity from the Exchange 
(such orders, ``Removed Retail Volume''); (vii) eliminate the Sub-
Dollar Rebate Tier; and (viii) modify the required criteria under the 
Tape A Quoting Tier. The Exchange proposes to implement the changes to 
the Fee Schedule pursuant to this proposal immediately. The text of the 
proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Exchange Rule 1.5(p).
    \4\ A ``Retail Order'' means an agency or riskless principal 
order that meets the criteria of FINRA Rule 5320.03 that originates 
from a natural person and is submitted to the Exchange by a Retail 
Member Organization (``RMO''), provided that no change is made to 
the terms of the order with respect to price or side of market and 
the order does not originate from a trading algorithm or any other 
computerized methodology. See Exchange Rule 11.21(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the Fee 
Schedule to: (i) increase the base rebates for executions of orders 
that add non-displayed liquidity to the Exchange (such orders, ``Added 
Non-Displayed Volume'') in securities priced at or above $1.00 per 
share; (ii) increase the base rebates for executions of Added Non-
Displayed Volume in securities priced below $1.00 per share (such 
orders, ``Added Non-Displayed Sub-Dollar Volume''); (iii) increase the 
base rebates provided for executions of orders in securities priced 
below $1.00 per share that add displayed liquidity to the Exchange 
(such orders, ``Added Displayed Sub-Dollar Volume''); (iv) modify the 
Non-Display Add Tiers by eliminating Non-Display Add Tiers 2 and 3; (v) 
adopt new standard fees for executions of orders that remove liquidity 
from the Exchange (such orders, ``Removed Volume''), separated by Tapes 
A, B, and C; (vi) reduce the fee

[[Page 53024]]

for executions of Retail Orders \5\ in securities priced at or above 
$1.00 per share that remove liquidity from the Exchange (such orders, 
``Removed Retail Volume''); (vii) eliminate the Sub-Dollar Rebate Tier; 
and (viii) modify the required criteria under the Tape A Quoting Tier, 
each as further described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ A ``Retail Order'' means an agency or riskless principal 
order that meets the criteria of FINRA Rule 5320.03 that originates 
from a natural person and is submitted to the Exchange by a Retail 
Member Organization (``RMO''), provided that no change is made to 
the terms of the order with respect to price or side of market and 
the order does not originate from a trading algorithm or any other 
computerized methodology. See Exchange Rule 11.21(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange first notes that it operates in a highly competitive 
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to 
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be 
excessive or incentives to be insufficient. More specifically, the 
Exchange is only one of 18 registered equities exchanges, as well as a 
number of alternative trading systems and other off-exchange venues, to 
which market participants may direct their order flow. Based on 
publicly available information, no single registered equities exchange 
currently has more than approximately 14% of the total market share of 
executed volume of equities trading.\6\ Thus, in such a low-
concentrated and highly competitive market, no single equities exchange 
possesses significant pricing power in the execution of order flow, and 
the Exchange currently represents approximately 2% of the overall 
market share.\7\ The Exchange in particular operates a ``Maker-Taker'' 
model whereby it provides rebates to Members that add liquidity to the 
Exchange and charges fees to Members that remove liquidity from the 
Exchange. The Fee Schedule sets forth the standard rebates and fees 
applied per share for orders that add and remove liquidity, 
respectively. Additionally, in response to the competitive environment, 
the Exchange also offers tiered pricing, which provides Members with 
opportunities to qualify for higher rebates or lower fees where certain 
volume criteria and thresholds are met. Tiered pricing provides an 
incremental incentive for Members to strive for higher tier levels, 
which provides increasingly higher benefits or discounts for satisfying 
increasingly more stringent criteria.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Market share percentage calculated as of September 29, 2025. 
The Exchange receives and processes data made available through 
consolidated data feeds (i.e., CTS and UTDF).
    \7\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Increase Base Rebates for Added Non-Displayed Volume
    The Exchange is proposing to uniformly increase the rebates 
provided for executions of Added Non-Displayed Volume in securities 
priced at or above $1.00 per share. Added Non-Displayed Volume is 
comprised of the three following types of orders: (i) orders subject to 
Display-Price Sliding that receive price improvement when executed 
(such orders, ``Added Price-Improved Volume''); (ii) Pegged orders \8\ 
with a Midpoint Peg \9\ instruction that add non-displayed liquidity to 
the Exchange (such orders, ``Added Midpoint Volume''); and (iii) orders 
which are not orders subject to Display-Price Sliding that receive 
price improvement when executed or Midpoint Peg Orders, that add non-
displayed liquidity to the Exchange (such orders, ``Added Non-Midpoint 
Hidden Volume'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Exchange Rule 11.6(h).
    \9\ See Exchange Rule 11.6(h)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, the Exchange provides a base rebate of $0.0008 per share 
for executions of Added Price-Improved Volume, Added Midpoint Volume, 
and Added Non-Midpoint Hidden Volume in securities priced at or above 
$1.00 per share. The Exchange now proposes to increase each of these 
base rebates to $0.0025 per share.\10\ The purpose of the rebate 
increase for executions of Added Non-Displayed Volume is to encourage 
participants to add liquidity on the Exchange. The Exchange believes is 
it appropriate to provide the same rebate for executions of Added 
Price-Improved Volume, Added Midpoint Volume, and Added Non-Midpoint 
Hidden Volume, as all of these orders similarly add liquidity to the 
Exchange and are executed at prices at are not displayed on the MEMX 
order book, and the Exchange notes that all of these orders are also 
currently subject to same pricing today.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The proposed base rebate for executions of Added Price-
Improved Volume is referred to by the Exchange on the Fee Schedule 
under the existing description ``Added volume, order subject to 
Display-Price Sliding that receives price improvement when 
executed'' and such orders will continue to receive a Fee Code of 
``P'' on execution reports. The proposed base rebate for executions 
of Added Midpoint Volume is referred to by the Exchange on the Fee 
Schedule under the existing description ``Added non-displayed 
volume, Midpoint Peg'', and such orders will continue to receive a 
Fee Code of ``M'' on execution reports. The proposed base rebate for 
executions of Added Non-Midpoint Hidden Volume is referred to by the 
Exchange on the Fee Schedule under the existing description ``Added 
non-displayed volume'' and such orders will continue to receive a 
Fee Code of ``H'' on execution reports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Increase Base Rebates for Added Non-Displayed Sub-Dollar Volume
    The Exchange is also proposing to increase the rebates provided for 
all sub-dollar executions of Added Non-Displayed Volume. As noted 
above, Added Non-Displayed Volume is comprised of the three following 
types of orders: (i) Added Price-Improved Volume; (ii) Added Midpoint 
Volume; and (iii) Added Non-Midpoint Hidden Volume. Currently, the 
Exchange provides a rebate of 0.075% of the total dollar value for each 
execution of Added Non-Displayed Volume in securities priced below 
$1.00 per share. This pricing structure is similarly applied to all 
executions of Added Non-Displayed Volume by Members that qualify for 
enhanced rebates in securities priced below $1.00 per share pursuant to 
the Non-Display Add Tiers. The Exchange now proposes to increase the 
rebate for all Added Non-Displayed Volume to 0.15% of total dollar 
value. Specifically, the Exchange will provide a rebate of 0.15% of the 
total dollar value for each execution of Added Midpoint Volume, Added 
Non-Midpoint Hidden Volume, and Added Price-Improved Volume in 
securities priced below $1.00 per share. The Exchange is similarly 
proposing to provide a rebate of 0.15% of the total dollar value to 
Members that qualify for an enhanced rebate pursuant to the Non-Display 
Add Tier 1 \11\ in securities priced below $1.00 per share. Thus, all 
Added Non-Displayed Volume will qualify for the same rebate for 
executions in securities priced below $1.00 per share.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The Exchange currently offers Non-Display Add Tiers 1, 2, 
and 3, however, as discussed further below, it is proposing to 
eliminate Non-Display Add Tiers 2 and 3, and as such, Non-Display 
Add Tier 1 will be the only Non-Display Add Tier remaining.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The purpose of the rebate increase for sub-dollar executions of 
Added Non-Displayed Volume is to encourage participants to add sub-
dollar liquidity on the Exchange. The proposed new rebate of 0.15% of 
the total dollar value will be the same rebate that is being proposed 
to be provided for sub-dollar executions which add displayed liquidity 
on the Exchange, as discussed further below. The Exchange believes by 
offering the same rebate for sub-dollar non-displayed liquidity as for 
displayed liquidity, the resulting pricing structure will encourage the 
provision of sub-dollar liquidity on the Exchange.

[[Page 53025]]

Additionally, the Exchange believes it is appropriate to provide the 
same rebate for sub-dollar executions of Added Price-Improved Volume 
and Added Midpoint Volume as for Added Non-Midpoint Hidden Volume, as 
all of these orders similarly add liquidity to the Exchange and are 
executed at prices that are not displayed on the Exchange's order book, 
and the Exchange notes that all of these orders are also currently 
subject to the same sub-dollar rebate and pricing structure today.
Increase Base Rebates for Added Displayed Sub-Dollar Volume
    The Exchange is also proposing to increase the rebates provided for 
all executions of Added Displayed Sub-Dollar Volume. Currently, the 
Exchange provides a rebate of 0.075% of the total dollar value for each 
execution of Added Displayed Volume in securities priced below $1.00 
per share. This pricing structure is similarly applied to all 
executions of Added Displayed Volume by Members that qualify for 
enhanced rebates in securities priced below $1.00 per share pursuant to 
Liquidity Provision Tiers 1-5, DLI Tiers 1-2, and Cross Asset Tier 1. 
The Exchange now proposes to increase the rebate for all Added 
Displayed Sub-Dollar Volume to 0.15% of the total dollar value. 
Specifically, the Exchange will provide a rebate of 0.15% of the total 
dollar value for each of execution of Added Displayed Volume in 
securities priced below $1.00 per share. The Exchange is similarly 
proposing to provide a rebate of 0.15% of total dollar value to Members 
that qualify for an enhanced rebate pursuant to the Liquidity Provision 
Tiers, the DLI Tiers, and Cross Asset Tier 1 in securities priced below 
$1.00 per share. Thus, all Added Displayed Volume will qualify for the 
same rebate for executions in securities priced below $1.00 per 
share.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ The Exchange notes that executions of Added Displayed 
Volume in Retail Orders in securities priced below $1.00 per share 
are currently provided a base rebate of 0.15% of the total dollar 
value of the Exchange. This sub-dollar rebate also applies to 
executions of Added Displayed Volume in Retail Orders in sub-dollar 
securities that meet the required criteria under Retail Tier 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The purpose of the rebate increase for executions of Added 
Displayed Sub-Dollar Volume is to encourage participants to add sub-
dollar liquidity on the Exchange. The proposed new rebate of 0.15% of 
the total dollar value will be the same rebate that is being proposed 
for sub-dollar executions which provide non-displayed liquidity on the 
Exchange, as discussed above. The Exchange believes by offering the 
same rebate for sub-dollar non-displayed liquidity as for displayed 
liquidity, the resulting pricing structure will encourage the provision 
of sub-dollar liquidity on the Exchange.
Non-Display Add Tiers
    The Exchange currently offers Non-Display Add Tiers 1-3 under which 
a Member may receive an enhanced rebate for executions of Added Non-
Displayed Volume by achieving the corresponding required volume 
criteria for each such tier. The Exchange now proposes to modify the 
Non-Display Add Tiers by eliminating Non-Display Add Tiers 2 and 3.
    With respect to Non-Display Add Tier 2, the Exchange provides an 
enhanced rebate of $0.0025 per share for executions of Added Non-
Displayed Volume in securities priced at or above $1.00 per share for 
Members that qualify for such tier by achieving a Non-Displayed ADAV 
\13\ that is equal to or greater than 2,00,000 shares. Under Non-
Display Add Tier 3, the Exchange provides an enhanced rebate of $0.0018 
per share for executions of Added Non-Displayed Volume in securities 
priced at or above $1.00 per share for Members that qualify for such 
tier by achieving a Non-Displayed ADAV that is equal to or greater than 
1,000,000 shares. The Exchange now proposes to eliminate Non-Display 
Add Tiers 2 and 3, as the Exchange no longer wishes to, nor is it 
required to, maintain such tiers. With respect to the current Non-
Display Add Tier 1, the Exchange is not proposing to make any changes 
to the rebate provided or the required criteria under such tier, 
however, as noted above, the Exchange has proposed to increase the 
rebate provided for all executions of Added Non-Displayed Sub-Dollar 
Volume, and as such, the Exchange is proposing to provide a rebate of 
0.15% of the total value of executions of Added Non-Displayed Sub-
Dollar volume for Members that qualify for an enhanced rebate pursuant 
to the Non-Display Add Tier 1.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ As set forth on the Fee Schedule, ``ADAV'' means the 
average daily added volume calculated as the number of shares added 
per day, which is calculated on a monthly basis, and ``Non-Displayed 
ADAV'' means ADAV with respect to non-displayed orders.
    \14\ The pricing for Non-Display Add Tier 1 is referred to by 
the Exchange on the Fee Schedule under the existing description 
``Added non-displayed volume, Non-Display Add Tier 1'' with a Fee 
Code of ``H1'', ``M1'', or ``P1'', as applicable, to be provided by 
the Exchange on the monthly invoices provided to Members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fees for Removed Volume
    The Exchange currently charges a standard fee of $0.0030 per share 
for executions of Removed Volume.\15\ The Exchange now wishes to modify 
the pricing for executions of Removed Volume by charging separate fees 
for Removed Volume based on whether the execution occurs in a Tape A, 
B, or C security, respectively. Specifically, the Exchange is proposing 
to charge a standard fee of $0.0029 per share for executions of Removed 
Volume in Tape A securities (such orders, ``Tape A Removed 
Volume''),\16\ a standard fee of $0.0030 per share for executions of 
Removed Volume in Tape B securities (such orders, ``Tape B Removed 
Volume''),\17\ and a standard fee of $0.0030 per share for executions 
of Removed Volume in Tape C securities (such orders, ``Tape C Removed 
Volume'').\18\ The Exchange is proposing to continue to charge a fee of 
0.28% of the total dollar value for all three categories of Removed 
Volume in securities priced below $1.00 per share, which is the current 
fee charged for such executions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ The standard fee for Removed Volume is referred to the 
Exchange on the Fee Schedule under the description, ``Removed volume 
from the MEMX Book'' with a Fee Code of ``R'' assigned by the 
Exchange.
    \16\ The proposed standard fee for executions of Tape A Removed 
Volume will be referred to by the Exchange on the Fee Schedule under 
the description ``Removed volume from MEMX Book, Tape A'' with a Fee 
Code of ``Ra'' on execution reports.
    \17\ The proposed standard fee for executions of Tape B Removed 
Volume will be referred to by the Exchange on the Fee Schedule under 
the description ``Removed volume from MEMX Book, Tape B'' with a Fee 
Code of ``Rb'' on execution reports.
    \18\ The proposed standard fee for executions of Tape C Removed 
Volume will be referred to by the Exchange on the Fee Schedule under 
the description ``Removed volume from MEMX Book, Tape C'' with a Fee 
Code of ``Rc'' on execution reports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The purpose of creating separate fees for Removed Volume by Tape 
and effectively charging a reduced fee of $0.0029 per share for 
executions of Tape A Removed Volume and maintaining a fee of $0.0030 
per share for executions of Tape B and Tape C Removed Volume is for 
business and competitive reasons, as the Exchange believes that such 
changes would incentivize Members to submit additional order flow in 
Tape A securities, thereby promoting price discovery and market quality 
on the Exchange with regard to such Tape A securities. Further, other 
exchanges similarly separate out their fee structure by Tape, and 
currently or have historically charged separate fees or provided 
separate rebates for executions based on Tape.\19\ The Exchange 
believes

[[Page 53026]]

that the proposed fee structure to charge separate fees by Tape is 
aligned with and comparable to such other national securities' 
exchanges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See, e.g., the NYSE Price List, available at: <a href="https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/markets/nyse/NYSE_Price_List.pdf">https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/markets/nyse/NYSE_Price_List.pdf</a>, and 
the Nasdaq Price List, available at: <a href="https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=PriceListTrading2">https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=PriceListTrading2</a>. See also reference to Nasdaq PSX 
pricing providing different fees per share for liquidity removal in 
Tape A and B securities versus for Tape C securities in NYSE's rule 
filing: Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-85864 (May 9, 2019), 
84 FR 23109 (May 21, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reduce Standard Fee for Removed Retail Volume
    Currently, the Exchange charges a standard fee of $0.0030 per share 
for executions of Removed Retail Volume. The Exchange now proposes to 
reduce the standard fee for executions of Removed Retail Volume to 
$0.0029 per share.\20\ The purpose of reducing the fee for executions 
of Removed Retail Volume is to incentivize Members to submit additional 
Retail orders to the Exchange. Additionally, the Exchange believes by 
offering the same reduced fee for Removed Retail Volume as the best 
priced fee for Removed (non-Retail Volume),\21\ the resulting pricing 
structure will encourage the provision of Retail orders on the 
Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ The proposed standard fee for executions of Removed Retail 
Volume is referred to by the Exchange on the Fee Schedule under the 
existing description ``Removed volume from MEMX Book, Retail Order'' 
with a Fee Code of ``RrA'' on execution reports.
    \21\ As noted previously, the lowest fee for Removed Volume 
proposed herein is similarly $0.0029 per share, for Tape A Removed 
Volume.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sub-Dollar Rebate Tier
    Currently, the Exchange offers a Sub-Dollar Rebate Tier under which 
a Member may receive an enhanced rebate of 0.15% of the total dollar 
value of the transaction for executions of orders in securities priced 
below $1.00 per share that add liquidity to the Exchange (such orders, 
``Added Sub-Dollar Volume'') for Members that qualify for such tier by 
achieving a Sub-Dollar ADAV \22\ that is equal to or greater than 
5,000,000 shares. The Exchange now proposes to eliminate this tier, as 
the Exchange's above-described proposal to increase the base rebate for 
all Added Sub-Dollar Volume to 0.15% of the total dollar value of the 
transaction renders the enhanced rebate provided under this tier 
obsolete.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ ``Sub-Dollar ADAV'' means ADAV with respect to orders in 
securities priced below $1.00 per share. ``ADAV'' means average 
daily added volume calculated as the number of shares added per day, 
calculated on a monthly basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tape A Quoting Tier
    The Exchange currently offers the Tape A Quoting Tier under which a 
Member may receive an additive rebate of $0.0002 per share for a 
qualifying Member's executions of Added Displayed Volume (other than 
Retail Orders) in Tape A securities priced over $1.00 per share by 
achieving an NBBO Time \23\ of at least 50% in an average of at least 
500 Tape A securities per trading day during the month. Now, the 
Exchange proposes to modify the required criteria under the Tape A 
Quoting Tier such that a Member would now qualify for such tier by 
achieving an NBBO time of at least 25% in an average of at least 100 
Tape A securities per trading day during the month.\24\ Thus, such 
proposed change would reduce the NBBO quoting time as well as the 
number of Tape A securities in which a Member is required to quote at 
the NBBO. The Exchange is not proposing to change the amount of the 
additive rebate provided under the Tape A Quoting Tier.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ As set forth on the Fee Schedule, ``NBBO Time'' means the 
aggregate of the percentage of time during regular trading hours 
during which one of a Member's MPIDs has a displayed order of at 
least one round lot at the national best bed or the national best 
offer.
    \24\ The pricing for the Tape A Quoting Tier is referred to by 
the Exchange on the Fee Schedule under the existing description 
``Tape A Quoting'' Tier with a Fee Code of ``a'' to be appended to 
the otherwise applicable Fee Code assigned by the Exchange on the 
monthly invoices for qualifying executions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\25\ in general, and with 
Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\26\ in particular, in that it 
provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and 
other charges among its Members and other persons using its facilities 
and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, 
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \26\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As discussed above, the Exchange operates in a highly fragmented 
and competitive market in which market participants can readily direct 
order flow to competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular 
venue to be excessive or incentives to be insufficient, and the 
Exchange represents only a small percentage of the overall market. The 
Commission and the courts have repeatedly expressed their preference 
for competition over regulatory intervention in determining prices, 
products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation NMS, 
the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in 
determining prices and SRO revenues and also recognized that current 
regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in 
promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most 
important to investors and listed companies.'' \27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005), 
70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the ever-shifting market share among the 
exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market participants can 
shift order flow or discontinue use of certain categories of products, 
in response to new or different pricing structures being introduced 
into the market. Accordingly, competitive forces constrain the 
Exchange's transaction fees and rebates, and market participants can 
readily trade on competing venues if they deem pricing levels at those 
other venues to be more favorable. The Exchange believes the proposal 
reflects a reasonable and competitive pricing structure designed to 
incentivize market participants to direct additional order flow, 
including displayed, non-displayed, liquidity-adding and/or liquidity-
removing orders to the Exchange, in both securities priced at or above 
$1.00 per share and in Sub-Dollar securities, which the Exchange 
believes would promote price discovery and enhance liquidity and market 
quality on the Exchange to the benefit of all Members and market 
participants.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed changes to increase the 
base rebates provided for all Added Non-Displayed Volume (both Sub-
Dollar and above $1.00 per share), to increase the base rebates 
provided for all executions of Added Displayed Sub-Dollar Volume, and 
to eliminate the now obsolete Sub-Dollar Rebate Tier as a result, are 
reasonable because, as described above, such changes are designed to 
encourage Members to submit additional liquidity adding orders to the 
Exchange, promoting price discovery and enhancing liquidity on the 
Exchange to the benefit of all Member and market participants. 
Additionally, the Exchange believes that the proposed base rebates 
provided for executions of Added Non-Displayed Volume, Added Non-
Displayed Sub-Dollar Volume and Added Displayed Sub-Dollar Volume are 
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory, as such base rebates will 
apply equally to all Members.
    The Exchange similarly believes that the proposed changes to 
separate the fees for Removed Volume out by Tape, thus charging a 
reduced fee for executions of Tape A Removed Volume and continuing to 
charge the same fee

[[Page 53027]]

for executions of Tape B and C Removed Volume, as well as the proposed 
change to reduce the fee for Removed Retail Volume, are reasonable 
because such changes are designed to encourage Members to submit 
additional liquidity removing orders to the Exchange, particularly in 
Tape A securities, as well as Retail Removing orders, and the proposed 
fees are equitable and unfairly discriminatory as such fees will apply 
equally to all Members. Further, other exchanges have historically and 
currently charge separate fees and provide separate rebates based on 
the Tape of a security, and as such, the Exchange's proposed Tape A, B 
and C Remove Volume fee structure is consistent with that of other 
market centers.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ See supra note 19.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes the proposed change to eliminate Non-Display 
Add Tiers 2 and 3 while maintaining Non-Display Add Tier 1 is 
reasonable because, as noted above, the Exchange is not required to 
maintain such tiers and the opportunity to qualify for Non-Display Add 
Tier 1 continues to be equally available to all Members, and continues 
to provide Members with an incremental incentive to achieve certain 
volume thresholds on the Exchange thereby contributing to a deeper, 
more liquid and well balanced market ecosystem on the Exchange to the 
benefit of all Members and market participants.
    The Exchange notes that volume and quoting-based incentives (such 
as tiers) have been widely adopted by exchanges, including the 
Exchange, and are reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory 
because they are open to all members on an equal basis and provide 
additional benefits that are reasonably related to the value to an 
exchange's market quality associated with higher levels of market 
activity, such as higher levels of liquidity provision and/or growth 
patterns, and the introduction of higher volumes of orders into the 
price and volume discovery process. The Exchange believes that the Tape 
A Quoting Tier, as modified by the proposed changes to the required 
criteria under such tier, is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly 
discriminatory for these same reasons, as such tier will continue to 
provide Members with an incremental incentive to achieve certain volume 
thresholds on the Exchange, is available to all Members on an equal 
basis, and, as described above, is designed to encourage Members to 
maintain or increase their order flow, including in the form of 
displayed, liquidity-adding, orders to the Exchange in Tape A 
securities in order to qualify for an additive rebate for executions of 
Added Displayed Volume in Tape A securities, thereby contributing to a 
deeper, more liquid and well balanced market ecosystem on the Exchange 
to the benefit of all Members and market participants. The Exchange 
also believes that the proposed changes to such tier reflects a 
reasonable and equitable allocation of fees and rebates, because, as 
noted above, the Exchange believes that the additive rebate under the 
Tape A Quoting Tier remains commensurate with the corresponding 
required criteria under such tier, and is reasonably related to the 
market quality benefits that the tier is designed to achieve.
    For the reasons discussed above, the Exchange submits that the 
proposal satisfies the requirements of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of 
the Act \29\ in that it provides for the equitable allocation of 
reasonable dues, fees and other charges among its Members and other 
persons using its facilities and is not designed to unfairly 
discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. As 
described more fully below in the Exchange's statement regarding the 
burden on competition, the Exchange believes that its transaction 
pricing is subject to significant competitive forces, and that the 
proposed rebates described herein are appropriate to address such 
forces.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposal will result in any 
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Instead, as discussed above, 
the proposal is intended to incentivize market participants to direct 
additional order flow to the Exchange, thereby enhancing liquidity and 
market quality on the Exchange to the benefit of all Members and market 
participants. As a result, the Exchange believes the proposal would 
enhance its competitiveness as a market that attracts actionable 
orders, thereby making it a more desirable destination venue for its 
customers. For these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal 
furthers the Commission's goal in adopting Regulation NMS of fostering 
competition among orders, which promotes ``more efficient pricing of 
individual stocks for all types of orders, large and small.'' \30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ See supra note 27.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Intramarket Competition
    As discussed above, the Exchange believes that the proposal would 
incentivize Members to submit additional order flow, including 
displayed, non-displayed, liquidity-adding and removing orders to the 
Exchange, in both Sub-Dollar securities as well as securities over 
$1.00 per share, thereby enhancing liquidity and market quality on the 
Exchange to the benefit of all Members, as well as enhancing the 
attractiveness of the Exchange as a trading venue, which the Exchange 
believes, in turn, would continue to encourage market participants to 
direct additional order flow to the Exchange. Greater liquidity 
benefits all Members by providing more trading opportunities and 
encourages Members to send additional orders to the Exchange, thereby 
contributing to robust levels of liquidity, which benefits all market 
participants.
    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed changes to increase 
the base rebates for executions of Added Displayed Sub-Dollar Volume, 
Added Non-Displayed Volume, and Added Non-Displayed Sub-Dollar Volume, 
the proposal to separate the Remove Volume fees by Tape and thus reduce 
the standard fee for Tape A Volume, or the proposal to reduce the 
standard fee for Removed Retail Volume would impose any burden on 
intramarket competition because such changes will apply to all Members 
uniformly in that the proposed base rebates and fee for such executions 
would be the base rebates and fees applicable to all Members, and the 
opportunity to qualify for enhanced rebates or discounted fees, as 
applicable, is available to all Members. Further, the opportunity to 
qualify for Non-Display Add Tier 1, and thus receive the proposed 
enhanced rebate for executions of Added Non-Displayed Volume under such 
tier, and the opportunity to qualify for the modified Tape A Quoting 
Tier and thus receive the proposed additive rebate for executions of 
Tape A Volume, would be available to all Members that meet the 
associated volume or quoting requirements in any month. For the 
foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes the proposed changes would not 
impose any burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Intermarket Competition
    As noted above, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive 
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to 
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a

[[Page 53028]]

particular venue to be excessive or incentives to be insufficient. 
Members have numerous alternative venues that they may participate on 
and direct their order flow to, including 17 other equities exchanges 
and numerous alternative trading systems and other off-exchange venues. 
As noted above, no single registered equities exchange currently has 
more than approximately 14% of the total market share of executed 
volume of equities trading. Thus, in such a low-concentrated and highly 
competitive market, no single equities exchange possesses significant 
pricing power in the execution of order flow. Moreover, the Exchange 
believes that the ever-shifting market share among the exchanges from 
month to month demonstrates that market participants can shift order 
flow or reduce use of certain categories of products, in response to 
new or different pricing structures being introduced into the market. 
Accordingly, competitive forces constrain the Exchange's transaction 
fees and rebates, including with respect to Added, Removed, Displayed, 
Non-Displayed, Sub-Dollar, and Tape A Volume, and market participants 
can readily choose to send their orders to other exchange and off-
exchange venues if they deem fee levels at those other venues to be 
more favorable. As described above, the proposed changes represent a 
competitive proposal through which the Exchange is seeking to generate 
additional revenue with respect to its transaction pricing and to 
encourage the submission of additional order flow to the Exchange 
through volume and quoting-based tiers, which have been widely adopted 
by exchanges, including the Exchange. Accordingly, the Exchange 
believes the proposal would not burden, but rather promote, intermarket 
competition by enabling it to better compete with other exchanges that 
offer similar pricing incentives to market participants.
    Additionally, the Commission has repeatedly expressed its 
preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining 
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. Specifically, 
in Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the importance of market 
forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized 
that current regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably 
successful in promoting market competition in its broader forms that 
are most important to investors and listed companies.'' \31\ The fact 
that this market is competitive has also long been recognized by the 
courts. In NetCoalition v. SEC, the D.C. Circuit stated as follows: 
``[n]o one disputes that competition for order flow is `fierce.' . . . 
As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market system, buyers and 
sellers of securities, and the broker-dealers that act as their order-
routing agents, have a wide range of choices of where to route orders 
for execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to take its market share 
percentages for granted' because `no exchange possesses a monopoly, 
regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of order flow from broker 
dealers'. . . .''.\32\ Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe its 
proposed pricing changes impose any burden on competition that is not 
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ Id.
    \32\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010) 
(quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2, 
2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSE-2006-21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \33\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \34\ thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \34\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to 
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or 
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

    <bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
    <bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2c5e594049014f4341414942585f6c5f494f024b435a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="87f5f2ebe2aae4e8eaeae2e9f3f4c7f4e2e4a9e0e8f1">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. Please include 
file number SR-MEMX-2025-31 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

    <bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-MEMX-2025-31. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection 
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include 
personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit 
only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may 
redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material 
that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions 
should refer to file number SR-MEMX-2025-31 and should be submitted on 
or before December 15, 2025.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \35\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-20693 Filed 11-21-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on November 24, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.