Notice2025-20691

Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the QOO and FOO Order Rebate in Section V. (Manual Transaction Fees) of the Fee Schedule for Trading on the BOX Options Market LLC Facility

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
November 24, 2025

Issuing agencies

Securities and Exchange Commission

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 224 (Monday, November 24, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 224 (Monday, November 24, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53035-53037]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-20691]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-104222; File No. SR-BOX-2025-27]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing 
and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the QOO 
and FOO Order Rebate in Section V. (Manual Transaction Fees) of the Fee 
Schedule for Trading on the BOX Options Market LLC Facility

November 19, 2025.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby 
given that on September 30, 2025, BOX Exchange LLC (``Exchange'') filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the 
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items 
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the proposed 
rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,\3\ and Rule 
19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal effective upon 
filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to 
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the 
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') a proposed rule change to amend the Fee Schedule on 
the BOX Options Market LLC (``BOX'') options facility. The Exchange 
proposes to amend the QOO (Qualified Open Outcry) and FOO (FLEX Open 
Outcry) Order Rebate in Section V. (Manual Transaction Fees) of the Fee 
Schedule. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to add an enhanced 
rebate. While changes to the Fee Schedule pursuant to this proposal 
will be effective upon filing, the changes will become operative on 
October 1, 2025. The text of the proposed rule change is available from 
the principal office of the Exchange, and also on the Exchange's 
internet website at <a href="https://rules.boxexchange.com/rulefilings">https://rules.boxexchange.com/rulefilings</a>.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend the QOO and FOO Order Rebate in 
Section V. (Manual Transaction Fees) of the Fee Schedule. Specifically, 
the Exchange proposes to add an enhanced rebate. The Exchange notes 
that this is a competitive filing that is based on a proposal submitted 
by MIAX Sapphire, LLC (``MIAX Sapphire''), as MIAX Sapphire submitted a 
filing on September 11, 2025, to describe the fees and rebates that 
will be applicable to transactions on its trading floor.\5\ In 
particular, MIAX Sapphire is offering a Floor Broker Breakup Credit. 
The MIAX Sapphire Floor Broker Breakup Credit will apply to the Floor 
Broker that submits the QFO (Qualified Floor Order) or cQFO (Complex 
Qualified Floor Order) instead of the Floor Broker rebate for 
executions that trade with a Floor Market Maker. BOX is now proposing 
to add a similar incentive to its Fee Schedule. The Exchange notes that 
BOX refers to this incentive as an enhanced rebate while MIAX Sapphire 
refers to it as a breakup credit. The Exchange believes that the term 
enhanced rebate is consistent with Section V. (Manual Transaction Fees) 
of the Fee Schedule and that referring to Floor Broker incentives in 
this section as rebates promotes clarity and avoids confusion among 
Floor Participants. Additionally, referring to the proposed incentive 
as an enhanced rebate instead of a breakup credit is consistent with 
how the rebate will be reported to Floor Participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See SR-SAPPHIRE-2025-39, available at <a href="https://www.miaxglobal.com/sites/default/files/filing-files/SR_SAPPHIRE_2025_39_1.pdf">https://www.miaxglobal.com/sites/default/files/filing-files/SR_SAPPHIRE_2025_39_1.pdf</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, Floor Brokers on BOX receive a $0.10 per contract rebate 
for all Broker Dealer and Market Maker QOO and FOO Orders presented on 
the Trading Floor and $0.05 per contract rebate for all Professional 
Customer QOO and FOO Orders presented on the Trading Floor. The rebate 
does not apply to Public Customer executions, executions subject to 
Section V.D of the BOX Fee Schedule, or Broker Dealer executions where 
the Broker Dealer is facilitating a Public Customer.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See BOX Exchange Fee Schedule Section V.C.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange now proposes that Floor Brokers that submit QOO and 
FOO Orders will receive $0.20 per contract enhanced rebate for 
executions that trade with a Floor Market Maker, in lieu of the 
existing $0.10 and $0.05 per contract rebates described in Section V.C. 
Accordingly, under the proposal, Floor Brokers that submit QOO and FOO 
Orders will now receive an enhanced rebate of $0.20 per contract, 
instead of the existing rebates of $0.10 or $0.05 per contract, for 
executions that trade with a Floor Market Maker. The enhanced rebate 
will not apply to Public Customer executions, executions subject to 
Section V.D (Strategy QOO Order Fee Cap and Rebate & Strategy FOO Order 
Fee Cap and Rebate), or Broker Dealer executions where the Broker 
Dealer is facilitating a Public Customer. The Exchange notes that 
Section V.D contains separate fee caps and rebates for certain Strategy 
QOO and FOO Orders and dividend strategies.
    The proposed changes are designed to attract order flow to BOX. The 
Exchange believes that offering the enhanced rebate provides an 
additional incentive for Floor Brokers to bring orders to the BOX 
Trading Floor.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the 
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act, in general, and Section 
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\7\ in particular, in that it provides 
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other 
charges among BOX Participants and other persons using its facilities 
and

[[Page 53036]]

does not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers or 
dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive 
environment. Indeed, there are currently 18 registered options 
exchanges that trade options. Based on publicly available information, 
no single options exchange has more than 17% of the U.S. options market 
share. More specifically, in June 2025, BOX had 6.79% market share of 
options contracts traded, 6.22% in July 2025, and 6.39% in August 
2025.\8\ The Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for 
competition over regulatory intervention in determining prices, 
products, and services in the securities markets. Particularly, in 
Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the importance of market 
forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized 
that current regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably 
successful in promoting market competition in its broader forms that 
are most important to investors and listed companies.'' \9\ As stated 
above, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in which 
market participants can readily direct order flow to competing venues 
if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be excessive or 
incentives to be insufficient. The proposed fee change reflects a 
competitive pricing structure designed to incentivize Floor Brokers to 
bring orders to the BOX Trading Floor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See <a href="https://www.cboe.com/us/options/market_share/market/2025-06-30/">https://www.cboe.com/us/options/market_share/market/2025-06-30/</a>, <a href="https://www.cboe.com/us/options/market_share/market/2025-07-31/">https://www.cboe.com/us/options/market_share/market/2025-07-31/</a> and <a href="https://www.cboe.com/us/options/market_share/market/2025-08-29//">https://www.cboe.com/us/options/market_share/market/2025-08-29//</a> (Month-to-Date (``MTD'') % of Mkt as of September 12, 
2025).
    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (``Regulation NMS Adopting 
Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes its proposal to offer Floor Brokers an 
enhanced rebate of $0.20 is reasonable, equitably allocated and not 
unfairly discriminatory as this proposal applies equally to all Floor 
Brokers. The Exchange believes that its proposal will encourage Floor 
Broker liquidity in all classes. Additional liquidity benefits all 
market participants by providing more trading opportunities. 
Specifically, the Exchange believes that Floor Brokers serve an 
important function in facilitating the execution of orders and price 
discovery for all market participants.
    The Exchange believes it is equitable and not unfairly 
discriminatory to only apply the rebate to Floor Brokers and not to 
Floor Market Makers. Floor Market Makers only represent their own 
interest on the Trading Floor and therefore do not need a similar 
incentive. Further, the Exchange believes it is equitable and not 
unfairly discriminatory to not apply the enhanced rebate to Public 
Customer executions or Broker Dealer executions where the Broker Dealer 
is facilitating a Public Customer, as these executions are not assessed 
a fee for their QOO or FOO Orders. Further, the Exchange believes it is 
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to not apply the enhanced 
rebate to executions subject to the Strategy QOO Order Fee Cap and 
Rebate & Strategy FOO Order Fee Cap and Rebate because additional 
incentives for these orders are not necessary, as they are subject to 
different rebates and fee caps.
    The Exchange's proposal to pay Floor Brokers an enhanced rebate for 
executions that trade with a Floor Market Maker is consistent with 
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act because it will encourage market 
participants to execute orders on the Trading Floor. The Exchange 
believes that the enhanced rebate could improve liquidity on the 
Exchange to the benefit of all market participants. Additionally, the 
proposal is also consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act because it 
perfects the mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market 
system and protects investors and the public interest because it 
applies equally to all Floor Broker QOO Orders and FOO Orders which are 
subject to an enhanced rebate and access to the Exchange is offered on 
terms that are not unfairly discriminatory.
    The Exchange notes that the proposed enhanced rebate is similar to 
breakup credits used to encourage Participants to submit PIP, COPIP, 
Facilitation and Solicitation orders.\10\ Specifically, the proposed 
enhanced rebate is consistent with the PIP and COPIP Break-Up Credit 
and the Facilitation and Solicitation Break-Up Credit. In these 
mechanisms, break-up credits are provided to Participants representing 
the agency order. Similarly, the Exchange proposes to provide an 
enhanced rebate to Floor Brokers for executions that trade with a Floor 
Market Maker. The Exchange believes that providing an enhanced rebate 
will incentivize Floor Brokers to bring order flow to the BOX Trading 
Floor which will result in increased trading opportunities for all 
Floor Participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See BOX Exchange Fee Schedule Sections IV.B (PIP and COPIP 
Transactions) and IV.C (Facilitation and Solicitation Transactions).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the ever-shifting market share among the 
exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market participants can 
shift order flow and discontinue or reduce use of certain categories of 
products in response to fee changes. Accordingly, competitive forces 
constrain options exchange transaction fees. Stated differently, 
changes to exchange transaction fees can have a direct effect on the 
ability of an exchange to compete for order flow. The Exchange believes 
the proposed changes are a reasonable attempt to effectively compete 
for Floor Broker orders. The Exchange believes that the proposed 
changes may incentivize Floor Brokers to bring order flow and, in turn, 
may make BOX a more competitive venue for order execution to the 
benefit of all market participants. As such, the Exchange believes the 
proposed changes are consistent with the Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Specifically, the proposal does 
not impose an undue burden on intra-market competition because all 
Floor Brokers are eligible to transact QOO Orders and FOO Orders \11\ 
and receive a rebate, if applicable. The Exchange believes that its 
proposal will encourage Floor Broker liquidity in all classes. 
Additional liquidity benefits all market participants by providing more 
trading opportunities. Further, additional liquidity will contribute to 
a robust trading environment on the BOX Trading Floor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The Exchange notes that to be qualified to trade FOO 
Orders, a Floor Broker must: (i) be registered as a Floor Broker 
under Exchange Rules; (ii) have passed the FLEX Floor Exam; and 
(iii) have submitted a Flex Equity Options Participant Clearing 
Authorization (Non-Market Maker) to the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that BOX will not collect additional fees on any 
given transaction under the proposal but will provide Floor Brokers an 
enhanced rebate for executions that trade with a Floor Market Maker. 
The Exchange does not believe that Floor Market Makers will be 
discouraged from transacting on the Trading Floor as Floor Market 
Makers trade for their own accounts and benefit from having access to 
interact with orders that are made available in open outcry on the 
Trading Floor. The Exchange also believes that Floor Market Maker fees 
relative to other market participants do not impose an undue burden on 
competition because Floor Market Makers are not obligated to engage in 
transactions on the Trading Floor. To the extent that there is an 
additional competitive burden on Floor

[[Page 53037]]

Market Makers, the Exchange believes that any such burden would be 
appropriate because Floor Brokers serve an important function in 
facilitating the execution of orders and price discovery for all market 
participants. Further, to the extent this proposal is successful, it 
will increase trading opportunities for Floor Market Makers because 
Floor Market Makers trade for their own accounts and benefit from 
having the opportunity to interact with orders that are made available 
in open outcry on the Trading Floor.
    The Exchange does not believe that not applying the enhanced rebate 
to Public Customer executions or Broker Dealer executions where the 
Broker Dealer is facilitating a Public Customer, will impose any burden 
on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act, as these executions are not assessed a fee for 
their QOO or FOO Orders. Further, the Exchange does not believe that 
not applying the enhanced rebate to executions subject to the Strategy 
QOO Order Fee Cap and Rebate & Strategy FOO Order Fee Cap and Rebate 
will impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act because these orders are subject 
to different rebates and fee caps and additional incentives for these 
orders are not necessary. The Exchange believes that the proposed 
enhanced rebate will not impair these Participants from adding 
liquidity and competing in open outcry on the Trading Floor and will 
help promote competition by providing incentives for Floor Brokers to 
submit customer order flow to the BOX Trading Floor and thus, create a 
greater opportunity for customer executions.
    The Exchange does not believe that offering Floor Brokers an 
enhanced rebate will impose an undue burden on competition because all 
qualified Floor Brokers are eligible to transact QOO and FOO Orders and 
thus may improve intra-market competition.\12\ Accordingly, the 
Exchange believes that providing an enhanced rebate to Floor Brokers 
for executions that trade with a Floor Market Maker does not impose an 
undue burden on intra-market competition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes the proposal does not impose an undue burden 
on intermarket competition because the proposed changes to the BOX Fee 
Schedule remain competitive with other options markets and will offer 
market participants with another choice of where to transact its 
business. Further, the Exchange believes that the rebate will promote 
competition by allowing Floor Brokers to competitively price their 
services and for the Exchange to remain competitive with other 
exchanges with open outcry trading floors. The Exchange notes that it 
operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants 
can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee levels at a 
particular venue to be excessive, or rebate opportunities available at 
other venues to be more favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange 
must continually adjust its fees and rebates to remain competitive with 
other exchanges. Because competitors are free to modify their own fees 
and rebates in response, and because market participants may readily 
adjust their order routing practices, the Exchange believes that the 
degree to which fee changes in this market may impose any burden on 
competition is extremely limited. The Exchange again notes that the 
proposed changes are a competitive response to a proposal submitted by 
MIAX Sapphire.\13\ For the reasons described above, the Exchange 
believes that the proposed rule change will encourage intermarket 
competition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See supra note 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Exchange Act \14\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) 
thereunder,\15\ because it establishes or changes a due, or fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend the rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that the action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
would otherwise further the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to 
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

    <bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
    <bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3745425b521a54585a5a525943447744525419505841"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c8babda4ade5aba7a5a5ada6bcbb88bbadabe6afa7be">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. Please include 
file number SR-BOX-2025-27 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

    <bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-BOX-2025-27. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). Copies of the filing will be available for inspection and 
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include 
personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit 
only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may 
redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material 
that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions 
should refer to file number SR-BOX-2025-27 and should be submitted on 
or before December 15, 2025.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-20691 Filed 11-21-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on November 24, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.