Proposed Rule2025-20441

Air Plan Approval; Minnesota; Metropolitan Council Wastewater Treatment Plant Title I PM10 SIP Revisions

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
November 20, 2025

Issuing agencies

Environmental Protection Agency

Abstract

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a request from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to revise its State Implementation Plan (SIP) by updating information for the Metropolitan Council Environmental Service (MCES) Metropolitan Council Wastewater Treatment Plant (Metro Plant) in Ramsey County, Minnesota. This SIP revision is being proposed in conjunction with an amendment to a part 70 permit maintaining federally enforceable title I SIP conditions. This SIP revision would result in a reduction of allowable emissions of particulate matter less than 10 microns (PM<INF>10</INF>) emitted by the facility.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 222 (Thursday, November 20, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 222 (Thursday, November 20, 2025)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 52303-52305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-20441]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2024-0268; FRL-12929-01-R5]


Air Plan Approval; Minnesota; Metropolitan Council Wastewater 
Treatment Plant Title I PM10 SIP Revisions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve a request from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to 
revise its State Implementation Plan (SIP) by updating information for 
the Metropolitan Council Environmental Service (MCES) Metropolitan 
Council Wastewater Treatment Plant (Metro Plant) in Ramsey County, 
Minnesota. This SIP revision is being proposed in conjunction with an 
amendment to a part 70 permit maintaining federally enforceable title I 
SIP conditions. This SIP revision would result in a reduction of 
allowable emissions of particulate matter less than 10 microns 
(PM<INF>10</INF>) emitted by the facility.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 22, 2025.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2024-0268 at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>, or via email to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b8d9cacad996cbd9cad9d0f8ddc8d996dfd7ce"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8decffffeca3feecffece5cde8fdeca3eae2fb">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. For comments submitted at <a href="http://Regulations.gov">Regulations.gov</a>, follow 
the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, 
comments cannot be edited or removed from the docket. EPA may publish 
any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit to EPA's 
docket at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> any information you consider to 
be Confidential Business Information (CBI), Proprietary Business 
Information (PBI), or other information whose disclosure is restricted 
by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 
accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the 
official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish 
to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents 
located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or 
other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please 
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI, 
PBI, or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making 
effective comments, please visit <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets">https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets</a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicole Naber, Air and Radiation 
Division (AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West 
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6609, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#caa4aba8afb8e4a4a3a9a5a6af8aafbaabe4ada5bc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b1dfd0d3d4c39fdfd8d2deddd4f1d4c1d09fd6dec7">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. The EPA Region 5 office is open from 8:30 a.m. to 
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' 
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.

I. Background

    This proposed SIP revision affects the Metro Plant at 2400 Childs 
Road, Saint Paul, Minnesota. This facility utilizes three fluidized bed 
incinerators each using activated carbon, a baghouse, a wet scrubber, 
and a wet electrostatic precipitator to process wastewater solids and 
reduce PM<INF>10</INF> emissions. The facility's permit contains site-
specific restrictions as part of Minnesota's SIP for PM<INF>10</INF> in 
the Red Rock Road PM<INF>10</INF> Maintenance Area. This SIP currently 
contains non-expiring title I conditions from a part 70 permit issued 
for the facility (Permit No. 12300053-006), which establish emission 
limits and various conditions that were deemed essential to reach 
attainment for the 1987 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) 
for PM<INF>10</INF>. This amendment to the MCES permit allows for the 
addition of a new emission unit, specifically an additional fluidized 
bed incinerator. To ensure the addition of this new unit will not cause 
a violation of the PM<INF>10</INF> standard, an emission limit decrease 
and discontinuation of some emission units are being included in the

[[Page 52304]]

permit revision. This permit revision results in a reduction of 
allowable PM<INF>10</INF> emissions at the facility; therefore, the 
MPCA is requesting that EPA approve changes to the site-specific SIP 
for MCES (included in the Minnesota SIP at 40 CFR 52.1220).

II. Analysis of Minnesota's Submittal

    The purpose of Minnesota's permit action and related site-specific 
SIP revision is to address changes at the facility, specifically the 
addition of a fluidized bed incinerator, and decreases in other 
emission limits, many of which are affected by title I SIP conditions. 
This SIP revision is being proposed with an amendment to a part 70 
permit maintaining federally enforceable title I SIP conditions (Air 
Emission Permit No. 12300053-102). The permit is final and was 
published on January 4, 2024, with an administrative amendment on March 
6, 2024. MPCA provided EPA with detailed emissions information for each 
of the changes to the permit and SIP as well as the overall 
PM<INF>10</INF> emission changes from the prior SIP submittal that EPA 
approved on September 11, 2002 (67 FR 57517), (associated with permit 
12300053-006), to this submittal (associated with permit 12300053-102). 
This SIP revision incorporates several changes made in Permit No. 
12300053-102 including lower allowable PM<INF>10</INF> emissions at the 
facility through more stringent emissions limits on several pieces of 
equipment and processes. The limits for existing fluidized bed 
incinerators (FBIs) EQUI 3, EQUI 4, and EQUI 5 will be lowered from 
2.01 pounds per hour (lbs/hr) PM<INF>10</INF> to 1.70 lbs/hr 
PM<INF>10</INF> on a 3-run average, as specified in permit conditions 
5.7.13, 5.8.13, and 5.9.13. The limits for auxiliary boilers EQUI 10 
and EQUI 11 will be lowered from 25.82 pounds per day (lbs/day) 
PM<INF>10</INF> to 18.54 lbs/day PM<INF>10</INF> on a 24-hour block 
average, as specified in permit condition 5.3.13. The limit for ash 
loadout housekeeping vacuum EQUI 50 will be lowered from 0.05 grains 
per dry standard cubic foot (gr/dscf) PM<INF>10</INF> to 0.005 gr/dscf 
PM<INF>10</INF>, on a 3-run average, as specified in permit condition 
5.24.2. Finally, MCES will also use natural gas instead of fuel oil in 
EQUI 10 and EQUI 11 significantly lowering the PTE from 1.23 lbs/hr 
PM<INF>10</INF> to 0.39 lbs/hr PM<INF>10</INF> and will modify their 
ash handling equipment to meet the new proposed PM<INF>10</INF> 
emission limit of 0.005 gr/dscf. The facility modeled these lower 
PM<INF>10</INF> emissions limits in conjunction with equipment and 
operational limitations and the analysis showed a combined decrease of 
6.3 tons per year in allowable emissions from the actions proposed in 
the title I SIP revision. The changes meet section 110(l) requirements 
since they are all decreases in emissions.
    The permit also includes changes that will not be incorporated into 
the SIP but are included in the docket as part of the submittal. These 
changes are still federally enforceable through non-expiring title I 
NAAQS synthetic minor conditions included in the facility's permit, 
under Minnesota's EPA-approved permit program. Specifically, these 
permit revisions include plans to build a fourth FBI (EQUI 133) and 
additional revisions such as rerouting of the pressure relief cycles. 
The potential to emit (PTE) from adding EQUI 133 and discontinuing EQUI 
9 will be lowered from 14.08 lbs/hr to 9.22 lbs/hr. If MCES builds EQUI 
133, it must also forfeit the construction and operation of three 
alkaline stabilization cells (EQUI 6, EQUI 7, EQUI 8). If MCES is 
unable to build the fourth FBI, MCES may continue with the previously 
permitted and SIP-approved construction and operation of three alkaline 
stabilization cells (EQUI 6, EQUI 7, EQUI 8). The facility provided 
modeling to demonstrate that these changes do not contribute to 
exceedances or violations of the PM<INF>10</INF> standard which were 
assessed through the New Source Review program to ensure they meet 
Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements.
    Under section 110(l) of the CAA, EPA cannot approve a SIP revision 
if it would interfere with attainment of the NAAQS, reasonable further 
progress toward attainment, or any other applicable requirement of the 
CAA. Through this submittal, MPCA has demonstrated to EPA that 110(l) 
requirements have been met through the permit amendment and the 
successive SIP revision. The SIP revision shows a decrease in emissions 
and the permit changes have also been demonstrated to not interfere 
with attainment of the NAAQS. Therefore, EPA finds that Minnesota's 
permit action and successive SIP revision meet CAA requirements.

III. What action is EPA taking?

    EPA is proposing to incorporate into Minnesota's SIP all the 
conditions cited as ``Title I Condition: 40 CFR 52.1220 
(PM<INF>10</INF> SIP)'' in Permit No. 12300053-102. These revisions 
include both the changes in ash handling within the facility and the 
lower allowable PM<INF>10</INF> emissions for each Fluidized Bed 
Incinerator (EQUI 3, EQUI 4, EQUI 5), auxiliary boilers (EQUI 10, EQUI 
11), and ash loadout vacuum (EQUI 50).
    This SIP submittal includes Permit No. 12300053-102 and the 
supporting technical documentation.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rulemaking, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule 
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance 
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by 
reference all the conditions cited as ``Title I Condition: 40 CFR 
52.1220(PM<INF>10</INF> SIP)'' in Minnesota Permit No. 12300053-102, 
published on January 4, 2024, with an administrative amendment on March 
6, 2024, discussed in section II of this preamble. EPA has made, and 
will continue to make, these documents generally available through 
<a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a> and at the EPA Region 5 Office (please contact the 
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of 
this preamble for more information).

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable 
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and 
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State 
law. For that reason, this action:
    <bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review 
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
    <bullet> Is not subject to Executive Order 14192 (90 FR 9065, 
February 6, 2025) because SIP actions are exempt from review under 
Executive Order 12866;
    <bullet> Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
    <bullet> Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
    <bullet> Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
    <bullet> Does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
    <bullet> Is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, 
April 23, 1997) because it approves a State program;

[[Page 52305]]

    <bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
    <bullet> Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA.
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian Tribe has 
demonstrated that a Tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 
country, the rulemaking does not have Tribal implications and will not 
impose substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal 
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 
2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Reporting 
and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: November 5, 2025.
Anne Vogel,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2025-20441 Filed 11-19-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on November 20, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.