Proposed Rule2025-20325

Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
November 19, 2025

Issuing agencies

Energy DepartmentFederal Energy Regulatory Commission

Abstract

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) proposes to amend its regulations to incorporate by reference certain modifications to the latest version (Version 4.0) of Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines adopted by the Wholesale Gas Quadrant (WGQ) of the North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB). NAESB's revisions in Version 4.0 of the standards streamline the process for accessing publicly available gas-electric coordination data during extreme cold weather or emergency events.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 221 (Wednesday, November 19, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 19, 2025)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 52012-52019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-20325]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

18 CFR Part 284

[Docket No. RM96-1-044]


Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas 
Pipelines

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) proposes 
to amend its regulations to incorporate by reference certain 
modifications to the latest version (Version 4.0) of Standards for 
Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines adopted by the 
Wholesale Gas Quadrant (WGQ) of the North American Energy Standards 
Board (NAESB). NAESB's revisions in Version 4.0 of the standards 
streamline the process for accessing publicly available gas-electric 
coordination data during extreme cold weather or emergency events.

DATES: Comments are due January 20, 2026.

ADDRESSES: Comments, identified by docket number, may be filed in the 
following ways. Electronic filing through <a href="https://www.ferc.gov">https://www.ferc.gov</a>, is 
preferred.
    <bullet> Electronic Filing: Documents must be filed in acceptable 
native applications and print-to-PDF, but not in scanned or picture 
format.
    <bullet> For those unable to file electronically, comments may be 
filed by U.S. Postal Service mail or by hand (including courier) 
delivery.
    [cir] Mail via U.S. Postal Service Only: Addressed to: Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First 
Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.

[[Page 52013]]

    [cir] Hand (including courier) delivery: Deliver to: Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, MD 20852.
    The Comment Procedures Section of this document contains more 
detailed filing procedures.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 
    Jerry Chiang (Technical Issues), Office of Technical Reporting and 
Economics, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502-8786, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#48222d3a3a31662b202129262f082e2d3a2b662f273e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ed87889f9f94c38e85848c838aad8b889f8ec38a829b">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.
    Oscar F. Santillana (Technical Issues), Office of Energy Market 
Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502-6392, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a6c9d5c5c7d488d5c7c8d2cfcacac7c8c7e6c0c3d4c588c1c9d0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c637f6f6d7e227f6d62786560606d626d4c6a697e6f226b637a">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.
    David Faerberg (Legal Issues), Office of the General Counsel, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, 
DC 20426, (202) 502-8275, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3a5e5b4c535e145c5b5f48585f485d7a5c5f4859145d554c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0a6e6b7c636e246c6b6f78686f786d4a6c6f7869246d657c">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

 
                                                              Paragraph
                                                                 Nos.
 
I. Overview................................................            1
II. Background.............................................            3
III. Discussion............................................            9
    A. Modifications to Version 4.0 of Business Practice              11
     Standards.............................................
        1. WGQ Additional Standards........................           12
        2. WGQ Quadrant Electronic Delivery Mechanism                 13
         Standards.........................................
        3. WGQ Capacity Release Related Standards..........           14
    B. Proposed Implementation Procedures..................           15
IV. Notice of Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards.........           23
V. Incorporation by Reference..............................           24
VI. Information Collection Statement.......................           31
VII. Environmental Analysis................................           38
VIII. Regulatory Flexibility Act...........................           39
IX. Comment Procedures.....................................           42
X. Document Availability...................................           45
 

I. Overview

    1. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) proposes 
to amend its regulations at 18 CFR 284.12 to incorporate by reference 
the latest modifications to Version 4.0 of Standards for Business 
Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines adopted by the Wholesale 
Gas Quadrant (WGQ) of the North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB) 
applicable to interstate natural gas pipelines. The incorporation by 
reference of these standards into the Commission's regulations would 
improve the coordination between the natural gas pipelines and electric 
utilities. Such coordination is essential to maintaining reliability 
for both the natural gas pipeline network system and the bulk electric 
system, especially during periods when both systems have coincident 
peak requirements.
    2. NAESB is an American National Standards Institute-accredited, 
non-profit standards development organization formed for the purpose of 
developing voluntary standards and model business practices that 
promote more competitive and efficient natural gas and electric 
markets. On December 4, 2024, NAESB filed a report informing the 
Commission that it had modified Version 4.0 of the business practice 
standards (Informational Report).\1\ These revisions to the standards 
would improve the reliability of the interstate natural gas 
infrastructure to support the bulk electric system and improve 
communication among gas and electric market participants to enhance 
situational awareness during extreme cold weather events.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See NAESB WGQ Business Practice Standards Version 4.0 
Report, Docket No. RM96-1-044 (Dec. 4, 2024).
    \2\ As explained below, NAESB has adopted two new standards and 
revisions to one existing standard in response to Recommendation 5 
of the report that the staffs of the Commission, North American 
Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC), and Regional Entities 
issued November 7, 2023: FERC et al., FERC, NERC & Reg'l Entity 
Staff Rep.: Inquiry into Bulk-Power Sys. Operations During Dec. 2022 
Winter Storm Elliott, Docket No. AD23-8-000, at 143 (Nov. 7, 2023) 
(Recommendation 5), <a href="https://elibrary.ferc.gov/eLibrary/filedownload?fileid=00F8FAAC-A049-C84B-8784-8BB5FEC00000">https://elibrary.ferc.gov/eLibrary/filedownload?fileid=00F8FAAC-A049-C84B-8784-8BB5FEC00000</a> (as updated 
Feb. 28. 2024, <a href="https://elibrary.ferc.gov/eLibrary/filedownload?fileid=BB92A244-97DD-C8A7-96AC-8D897D600000">https://elibrary.ferc.gov/eLibrary/filedownload?fileid=BB92A244-97DD-C8A7-96AC-8D897D600000</a>) 
[hereinafter Winter Storm Elliot Report].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Background

    3. Since 1996, the Commission has incorporated by reference in its 
regulations NAESB's business practice standards and communication 
methodologies of interstate natural gas pipelines to create a more 
integrated and efficient pipeline network system. These regulations 
have been promulgated in the Order No. 587 series of orders,\3\ wherein 
the Commission has incorporated by reference the standards for 
interstate natural gas pipeline business practices and electronic 
communications developed by NAESB's WGQ. Upon incorporation by 
reference, these revisions to the standards will modify the currently 
incorporated version (Version 4.0) of NAESB's business practice 
standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ This series of orders began with the Commission's issuance 
of Order No. 587, Standards for Bus. Pracs. of Interstate Nat. Gas 
Pipelines, 61 FR 39053 (July 26, 1996), FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,038 
(1996) (cross-referenced at 76 FERC ] 61,042).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    4. On July 25, 2022, then-Chairman Richard Glick of the Commission 
and Jim Robb, President and CEO of the NERC, sent a letter to NAESB 
requesting NAESB convene a forum ``to identify actions that will 
improve the reliability of the natural gas infrastructure system as 
necessary to support the bulk electric system and to address recurring 
challenges stemming from natural gas-electric infrastructure 
interdependency.'' \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Letter from then-Chairman Richard Glick of the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission and Jim Robb, President and CEO of the 
North American Reliability Corporation to Michael Desselle, Chairman 
of NAESB, and Jonathan Booe, Executive Vice President and Chief 
Operating Officer (July 25, 2022) (on file at NAESB), <a href="https://naesb.org/pdf4/FERC_NERC_Letter_072922_to_NAESB.pdf">https://naesb.org/pdf4/FERC_NERC_Letter_072922_to_NAESB.pdf</a>. See also, FERC, 
NERC, and Regional Entity Staff Report, The February 2021 Cold 
Weather Outage in Texas and the South Central United States (Nov. 
2021) (Recommendation 7), <a href="https://www.ferc.gov/media/february-2021-cold-weather-outages-texas-and-south-central-united-states-ferc-nerc-and">https://www.ferc.gov/media/february-2021-cold-weather-outages-texas-and-south-central-united-states-ferc-nerc-and</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    5. In response to that letter, NAESB convened a Gas-Electric 
Harmonization Forum to consider issues related to the challenges 
stemming from natural gas-electric interdependency. Over 700 
individuals representing more than 370 different organizations from all 
segments of the natural gas and electric markets participated in the 
Gas-Electric Harmonization Forum. NAESB released

[[Page 52014]]

its Gas-Electric Harmonization Forum Report on July 28, 2023, which 
identified 20 recommendations for consideration to improve the 
reliability of natural gas infrastructure as necessary to support the 
bulk electric system and to address the recurring challenges stemming 
from natural gas-electric interdependency.
    6. On November 7, 2023, as updated on February 28, 2024, the 
Commission, NERC, and various regional entities published a report on 
the performance of the bulk power system during Winter Storm Elliot in 
December of 2022.\5\ The report looked at the cold weather event that 
occurred between December 21 and December 26, 2022 (Winter Storm 
Elliott), in which unplanned cold-weather outages significantly 
jeopardized grid reliability. Part of this analysis looked at how the 
events affected the interrelation between transportation on natural gas 
pipelines and generator outages. The Winter Storm Elliot Report 
included several recommendations concerning natural gas-electric 
coordination. Specifically, to help improve the interrelation between 
natural gas pipelines and the electric system, the report recommended 
that NAESB ``convene natural gas infrastructure entities, electric grid 
operators, and LDCs (local distribution companies) to identify 
improvements in communication during extreme cold weather events to 
enhance situational awareness.'' \6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Winter Storm Elliott Report, supra note 2.
    \6\ Id. at 143.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    7. In response to the Winter Storm Elliot Report, the NAESB Board 
of Directors created a jointly assigned annual plan item as part of the 
WGQ, Wholesale Electric Quadrant (WEQ), and Retail Market Quadrant 
(RMQ) 2024 Annual Plans. The Annual Plan directed the Joint WGQ, WEQ, 
and RMQ Business Practices Subcommittees to review and modify the NAESB 
Gas/Electric Coordination Business Practice Standards, and any 
corresponding standards, that could improve communications among gas 
and electric market participants and enhance situational awareness 
during extreme weather events without endangering sensitive commercial 
information. Between January and July 2024, the Joint WGQ, WEQ, and RMQ 
Business Practices Subcommittees held ten meetings to identify and 
evaluate possible areas of standards development. NAESB states that 
``on July 19, 2024, the joint subcommittees voted out a recommendation 
proposing new and revised WGQ Business Practice Standards.'' NAESB 
further states that ``[o]n October 24, 2024, the NAESB WGQ Executive 
Committee voted to approve the recommendation with super majority 
support. NAESB WGQ membership subsequently ratified the new and revised 
standards on November 25, 2024.'' \7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Informational Filing at 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    8. On December 4, 2024, NAESB filed its Informational Report 
informing the Commission that it had modified Version 4.0 of the NAESB 
WGQ Business Practice Standards applicable to interstate natural gas 
pipelines. The NAESB Informational Report identifies three 
modifications to the WGQ Version 4.0 standards, which include one 
revised standard and two new standards, and discusses the deliberations 
that led to the changes. The revision creates a central location on 
pipeline Informational Postings websites where transportation service 
providers can post publicly available data, including scheduled 
quantity information. This revision establishes a new information 
posting category, ``Gas Electric Coordination,'' for use, when 
applicable, by a transportation service provider to help streamline the 
process for Regional Transmission Organizations/Independent System 
Operators (RTO/ISO) and other parties accessing this data during 
extreme weather or emergency events. One new standard facilitates the 
posting of applicable scheduled quantity information for power plants 
that are directly connected to the pipeline as part of the ``Gas 
Electric Coordination'' category. The second new standard supports the 
inclusion of the geographic information of impacted area(s), 
location(s), and/or pipeline facility(ies) by a transportation service 
provider when issuing a critical notice. Pipelines are currently 
required to make this information available through computer-to-
computer electronic data interchange in addition to other batch file 
downloadable formats they may provide.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 18 CFR 284.12 (a)(1)(v), (b)(3)(i)(A). See Standards for 
Bus. Pracs. of Interstate Nat. Gas Pipelines, Order No. 587-G, 83 
FERC ] 61,029, at text accompanying note 58 (1998), 63 FR 20072 
(April 23, 1998).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Discussion

    9. In this notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR), we propose to 
incorporate by reference in our regulations the three modifications to 
Version 4.0 of the NAESB WGQ consensus business practice standards. As 
an initial matter, we note that the modified WGQ Version 4.0 standards 
include two new standards and one revised standard to the following 
sets of existing Version 4.0 WGQ Business Practice Standards. Each set 
of Business Practice Standards is hereafter referred to as a 
``manual.''

------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Manual                     Business practice standards
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.............................  Additional Standards.
4.............................  Quadrant Electronic Delivery Mechanism
                                 Related Standards.
5.............................  Capacity Release Related Standards.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

We propose that compliance filings to revise pipeline tariffs to 
reflect the changes in accordance with a final rule be filed with the 
Commission no later than 120 days after the Commission issues a final 
rule in this proceeding or, if the compliance filing date falls on a 
weekend or holiday, on the first business day thereafter, with a 
proposed effective date 180 days from the date compliance filings are 
due in this proceeding.

    10. We discuss below some specific aspects of NAESB's Informational 
Report.

A. Modifications to Version 4.0 of Business Practice Standards

    11. NAESB uses its consensus process to develop and approve WGQ 
business practice standards. As the Commission found in the Order No. 
587 series of orders, incorporation by reference of consensus standards 
is appropriate, because the consensus process helps ensure the 
reasonableness of the standards by requiring that the standards draw 
support from a broad spectrum of industry participants representing all 
segments of the industry. Moreover, because the industry conducts 
business under these standards, the Commission has found value in 
incorporating standards that have the widest possible support. In 
section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act 
of 1995,\9\ Congress affirmatively requires federal agencies to use 
technical standards developed by voluntary consensus standards 
organizations, like NAESB, to carry out policy objectives or 
activities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Public Law 104-113, 12(d), 110 Stat. 775 (1996).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. WGQ Additional Standards
    12. The modified WGQ Version 4.0 added a new standard, WGQ Standard 
No. 0.3.30, to the Additional Standards manual, which supports a 
natural gas transportation service provider in posting scheduled 
quantity information for power plants directly connected to the 
pipeline, as part of the newly established Gas Electric Coordination

[[Page 52015]]

category. WGQ Standard No. 0.3.30 identifies examples of the data that 
could be posted in the new category, including Cycle Indicator (Cycle) 
which are the specific times throughout the gas day for shippers to 
submit nomination requests for natural gas transportation. According to 
existing NAESB standard provisions, ``Cycle'' would include each of the 
five standard daily nominations cycles (Timely, Evening, Intraday 1, 
Intraday 2, and Intraday 3) or additional transportation service 
provider defined cycles. WGQ Standard 0.3.30 also includes the 
Effective Gas Day (Eff Gas Day), which is the Gas Day for which the 
information is applicable, beginning at 9AM Central Clock Time and 
ending 9AM Central Clock Time the next day. It also includes the 
Effective Time (Eff Time), the time for which the posted information is 
applicable, which may be subsequent to the posting.
    13. Additionally, WGQ Standard No. 0.3.30 also includes fields 
describing the applicable generators' locations including the 
generator's location (Loc), which may be the transportation service 
providers' assigned identifier where transactions may take place, 
Location Name (Loc Name), Location County (Loc Cnty), Location State 
Abbreviation (Loc St Abbrev). The standard also includes the 
Measurement Basis (Meas Basis), such or Million British Thermal Units.
    14. WGQ Standard No. 0.3.30 includes Posting Date (Post Date) and 
Posting Time (Post Time) the date and time at which transportation 
service providers post the relevant information. Finally, the standard 
includes posting of the RTO/ISO in whose service territory the affected 
generator is directly connected to the interstate pipeline and Total 
Scheduled Quantity (TSQ)--the net quantity scheduled to be delivered to 
each applicable generator at the effective date and time of the 
posting.
2. WGQ Quadrant Electronic Delivery Mechanism Standards
    15. The modified WGQ Version 4.0 revised existing standard WGQ 
Standard No. 4.3.23 under the Quadrant Electronic Delivery Mechanism 
Standards manual by establishing a new information posting category, 
Gas Electric Coordination, for use by a transportation service provider 
as part of its Informational Postings website. The revised WGQ Standard 
No. 4.3.23 creates a central location on an Informational Postings 
website where a transportation service provider can post publicly 
available data, including scheduled quantity information, to help RTOs/
ISOs and other parties access these data.
3. WGQ Capacity Release Related Standards
    16. The modified WGQ Version 4.0 added a new standard, WGQ Standard 
No. 5.3.74 under the Capacity Release Related Standards manual, to 
support the inclusion of geographic information when a natural gas 
transportation service provider issues a critical notice, such as 
geographic information of impacted areas, locations, and pipeline 
facilities.\10\ The inclusion of geographic information in a critical 
notice can help parties receiving critical notices, including end users 
and RTOs/ISOs, identify and assess any possible impact to their 
systems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Critical notices are notices posted on a transportation 
service provider's website that, according to existing WGQ Version 
4.0 Standard No. 5.2.1, ``pertain to information on transportation 
service provider conditions that affect scheduling or adversely 
affect scheduled gas flow.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Proposed Implementation Procedures

    17. We propose to use the compliance filing requirements explained 
below, as revised and prescribed in Order No. 587-V, to increase the 
transparency of the interstate natural gas pipelines' incorporation by 
reference of the NAESB WGQ Standards so that shippers and the 
Commission will know which tariff provision(s) implements each standard 
as well as the status of each standard.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Standards for Bus. Pracs. of Interstate Nat. Gas Pipelines, 
Order No. 587-V, 77 FR 43711 (July 26, 2012), 140 FERC ] 61,036, at 
PP 36-39 (2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    18. We propose that compliance filings to revise pipeline tariffs 
to reflect the changes in accordance with a final rule be filed with 
the Commission no later than 120 days after issuance of a final rule by 
the Commission in this proceeding or, if the compliance filing date 
falls on a weekend or holiday, on the first business day thereafter, 
with a proposed effective date 180 days from the date compliance 
filings are due in this proceeding. As the Commission found in Order 
No. 587-V, incorporation by reference of the revised compliance filing 
requirements would increase the transparency of the interstate natural 
gas pipelines' incorporation by reference of the NAESB WGQ Standards so 
that shippers and the Commission would know which tariff provision(s) 
implements each standard as well as the status of each standard.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ Trans-Union Interstate Pipeline L.P., 141 FERC ] 61,167, at 
P 36 (2012) (Order No. 587-V Compliance Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    19. Consistent with the Commission's practice since Order No. 587-
V, each interstate natural gas pipeline must designate a single tariff 
section under which every NAESB WGQ Standard incorporated by reference 
by the Commission is listed.\13\ For each NAESB standard, the pipeline 
must specifically list in that tariff section:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ Id. P 36; Standards for Bus. Pracs. of Interstate Nat. Gas 
Pipelines, 174 FERC ] 61,103, at P 21 (2021) (Version 3.2 NOPR).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (a) whether the standard is incorporated by reference;
    (b) for those standards not incorporated by reference, the tariff 
provision that complies with the standard; or
    (c) for those standards with which the pipeline does not comply, an 
indication in the tariff section of whether the pipeline has been 
granted a waiver, extension of time, or other variance with respect to 
compliance with the standard.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ Shippers can use the Commission's electronic tariff system 
to locate the tariff record containing the NAESB standards, which 
will indicate the docket in which any waiver or extension of time 
was granted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    20. For those standards with which the pipeline does not comply, 
the pipeline must provide an explanatory statement in the transmittal 
letter of whether the pipeline has been granted a waiver, extension of 
time, or other variance with respect to compliance with the standard.
    21. Likewise, consistent with past practice, we will post on the 
Commission's eLibrary website (under Docket No. RM96-1-044) a sample 
tariff format to provide filers with an illustrative example to aid 
them in preparing their compliance filings.
    22. Consistent with our policy since Order No. 587-V,\15\ entities 
may request waivers under the requirements set forth in Order No. 587-V 
and the Commission will then evaluate those requests.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Order No. 587-V, 140 FERC ] 61,036.
    \16\ Order No. 587-V Compliance Order, 141 FERC ] 61,167 at PP 
4, 38 (a pipeline does not need to seek a waiver for standards that 
address business practices that the pipeline does not offer).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    23. If a pipeline is requesting a continuation of an existing 
waiver or extension of time, it must include a table in its transmittal 
letter that identifies the standard for which the Commission granted 
the waiver or extension of time, and the docket number or order 
citation to the proceeding in which the Commission granted the waiver 
or extension of time. The pipeline also must present an explanation for 
why such waiver or extension of time should remain in force with regard 
to the modified WGQ Version 4.0 Standards incorporated by reference in 
any final rule.
    24. This continues the Commission's practice of having pipelines 
include in

[[Page 52016]]

their tariffs a common location that identifies the way in which the 
pipeline is incorporating all the NAESB WGQ Standards and the standards 
with which it is required to comply.

IV. Notice of Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards

    25. Office of Management and Budget Circular A 119 (February 10, 
1998) provides that Federal Agencies should publish a request for 
comment in a NOPR when the agency is seeking to issue or revise a 
regulation proposing to incorporate by reference a voluntary consensus 
standard or a government-unique standard. In this NOPR, the Commission 
is proposing to incorporate by reference a new WGQ Version 4.0 
Additional Business Practice Standard No. 0.3.30, a revised WGQ Version 
4.0 Quadrant Electronic Delivery Mechanism Related Business Practice 
Standard No. 4.3.23, and a new WGQ Version 4.0 Capacity Release Related 
Business Practice Standard No. 5.3.74, which are voluntary consensus 
standards developed by the WGQ.

V. Incorporation by Reference

    26. The Office of the Federal Register requires agencies proposing 
to incorporate material by reference into their regulations to discuss 
the ways that the materials it incorporates by reference are reasonably 
available to interested parties and how interested parties can obtain 
the materials.\17\ The regulations also require agencies to summarize, 
in the preamble of the final rule, the material that it incorporates by 
reference. The latest modifications to the Version 4.0 standards we are 
proposing to incorporate by reference consist of revisions to three 
sets of NAESB WGQ Business Practice Standards that address a variety of 
topics and are designed to streamline the transactional processes for 
the wholesale natural gas industry by promoting a more reliable and 
efficient market. The applicable sets comprise a new WGQ Additional 
Business Practice Standard, a revised WGQ Quadrant Electronic Delivery 
Mechanism Related Business Practice Standard, and a new WGQ Capacity 
Release Related Business Practice Standard. We summarize these three 
sets of standards below.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 1 CFR 51.5. See Incorporation by Reference, 79 FR 66267 
(Nov. 7, 2014).
    \18\ In addition to the new and revised standards described 
above and included in NAESB's December 4, 2024 report, the 
Commission also is incorporating by reference recently revised WGQ 
Invoicing Related Standards (Version 4.0) that includes the Minor 
Correction incorporated by reference in Standards for Bus. Pracs. of 
Interstate Nat. Gas Pipelines, Order No. 587-AA, 89 FR 97518 (Dec. 
9, 2024), 189 FERC ] 61,135 (2024). The standard contains no 
substantive changes from those adopted in Order No. 587-AA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    27. The WGQ Additional Standards address standards that are in 
addition to the five distinct areas of business activities--
Nominations, Flowing Gas, Invoicing, Electronic Delivery Mechanism, and 
Capacity Release. The six categories within the WGQ Additional 
Standards are: (1) General; (2) Creditworthiness; (3) Gas/Electric 
Operational Communications; (4) Operating Capacity and Unsubscribed 
Capacity; (5) Location Data Download; and (6) Storage Information.
    28. The WGQ Quadrant Electronic Delivery Mechanism Related 
Standards define the framework for the electronic dissemination and 
communication of information between parties in the North American 
wholesale gas marketplace for Electronic Data Interchange/EDM 
transfers, batch flat file/EDM transfers, informational postings 
websites, Electronic Bulletin Boards/EDM, and interactive flat file/
EDM.
    29. The WGQ Capacity Release Related Standards define the business 
processes for communication of information related to the selling of 
all or any portion of a transportation service requester's contract 
rights.
    30. Commission regulations provide that copies of the standards 
incorporated by reference may be obtained through purchase or otherwise 
from the North American Energy Standards Board, 1415 Louisiana, Suite 
3460, Houston, Texas 77002, phone: (713) 356-0060, website: <a href="https://www.naesb.org/">https://www.naesb.org/</a>. The standards can also be reviewed without purchasing 
them.
    31. The procedures used by NAESB make its standards reasonably 
available to those affected by Commission regulations, which generally 
is comprised of entities that have the means to acquire the information 
they need to effectively participate in Commission proceedings. 
Participants can join NAESB, for an annual membership cost of $8,000, 
which entitles them to full participation in NAESB and enables them to 
obtain these standards at no additional cost. Non-members may obtain 
any of the ten individual standards manuals for $250 per manual, which 
in the case of these standards would total $750 for all three manuals. 
Non-members also may obtain the complete set of Standards Manuals for 
$2,000.
    32. NAESB provides ample opportunities for non-members, including 
agents, subsidiaries, and affiliates of NAESB members, to obtain access 
to the copyrighted standards through a no-cost limited copyright 
waiver. The limited copyright waivers are issued by the NAESB office 
and are granted to non-members on a case-by-case basis for the purpose 
of evaluating standards prior to purchase and/or reviewing the 
standards to prepare comments to a regulatory agency. Following the 
granting of a limited copyright waiver, the non-member is provided with 
read-only access to the standards through the end of the comment period 
or some other set period of time via Locklizard Safeguard Secure 
Viewer.\19\ NAESB will grant one limited copyright wavier per company 
for each set of standards or final actions. Any entity seeking a 
limited copyright waiver should contact the NAESB office.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ For more information on Locklizard, please refer to the 
company's website: <a href="https://www.locklizard.com">https://www.locklizard.com</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

VI. Information Collection Statement

    33. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) regulations require 
that OMB approve certain reporting, record keeping, and public 
disclosure requirements (information collection) imposed by an 
agency.\20\ Therefore, we are submitting our proposed information 
collection to OMB for review in accordance with section 3507(d) of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Upon approval of a collection of 
information, OMB will assign an OMB control number and an expiration 
date. Respondents subject to the filing requirements of a rule will not 
be penalized for failing to respond to these collections of information 
unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control 
number.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 5 CFR 1320.11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    34. We solicit comments on our need for this information, whether 
the information will have practical utility, the accuracy of the 
provided burden estimates, ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 
clarity of the information to be collected, and any suggested methods 
for minimizing respondents' burden, including the use of automated 
information techniques.
    35. Public Reporting Burden: The Commission's burden estimates for 
the proposals in this NOPR are for one-time implementation of the 
information collection requirements of this NOPR (including tariff 
filing, documentation of the process and procedures, and information 
technology work).
    36. The collections of information related to this NOPR fall under 
FERC-545 (Gas Pipeline Rates: Rate Change (Non-Formal)) \21\ and FERC-
549C

[[Page 52017]]

(Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas 
Pipelines).\22\ The following estimates of reporting burden are related 
only to this NOPR and anticipate the costs to interstate natural gas 
pipelines for compliance with our proposals in this NOPR. The burden 
estimates are related to implementing these standards and regulations 
and will not result in ongoing costs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ FERC-545 covers rate change filings made by natural gas 
pipelines, including tariff changes.
    \22\ FERC-549C covers Standards for Business Practices of 
Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines.
    \23\ The number of respondents is the number of entities in 
which a change in burden from the current standards to the proposed 
exists, not the total number of entities from the current or 
proposed standards that are applicable.
    \24\ The estimated hourly cost (salary plus benefits) provided 
in this section is based on the salary figures for May 2024 posted 
on April 2, 2025 by the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the Utilities 
sector (available at <a href="https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics2_22.htm">https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics2_22.htm</a>) 
and scaled to reflect benefits using the relative importance of 
employer costs for employee compensation (available at <a href="https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.nr0.htm">https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.nr0.htm</a>). The hourly estimates for 
salary plus benefits are:
    Computer and Information Systems Manager (Occupation Code: 11-
3021), $110.62.
    Computer and Information Analysts (Occupation Code: 15-1210), 
$68.34.
    Electrical Engineer (Occupation Code: 17-2071), $71.19.
    Legal (Occupation Code: 23-0000), $140.76.
    The average hourly cost (salary plus benefits), weighting these 
skill sets evenly, is $97.728. We round it to $98/hour.

                                                      RM96-1-044 NOPR (Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Number of     Annual number
                                            respondents    of responses    Total number of      Average burden hr. per response       Total annual burden hours & total annual  Annual costs per
                                               \23\       per respondent      responses                                                              cost \24\                   respondent ($)
                                                     (1)             (2)   (1) * (2) = (3)  (4)....................................  (3) * (4) = (5)..........................     (5)/(1) = (6)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FERC-545 (one-time).....................             193               1               193  10 hrs.; $980..........................  1,930 hrs.; $189,140.....................              $980
FERC-549C (one-time)....................             193               1               193  100 hrs.; $9,800.......................  19,300 hrs.; $1,891,400..................             9,800
                                         -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total...............................  ..............             386  ................  .......................................  21,230 hrs.; $2,080,540..................  ................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The total one-time burden (for both the FERC-545 and FERC-549C) 
would take place in Year 1 as follows:

FERC-545: 193 entities x 1 response/entity (10 hours/response x $98/
hour) = $189,140
FERC-549C: 193 entities x 1 response/entity (100 hours x $98/hour) = 
$1,891,400

    Title: FERC-545, Gas Pipeline Rates: Rates Change (Non-Formal); 
FERC-549C, Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas 
Pipelines.
    Action: Proposed information collections
    OMB Control Nos.: 1902-0154 (FERC-545), 1902-0174 (FERC-549C).
    Respondents: Business or other for profit (e.g., Natural Gas 
Pipelines, applicable to only a few small businesses).
    Frequency of Responses: One-time implementation (related to 
business procedures, capital/start-up).
    37. Necessity of Information: In response to NAESB's standard 
development activities, the proposals in this NOPR would, if 
implemented, make minor adjustments to the standards previously 
incorporated by reference by the Commission. First, a revised standard 
in the WGQ Quadrant Electronic Delivery Mechanism Related Standards 
manual, WGQ Standard No. 4.3.23, establishes a new information posting 
category--Gas Electric Coordination, for use by a transportation 
service provider when applicable, to help streamline the process for 
RTOs/ISOs and other parties accessing critical data during extreme cold 
weather or emergency events. Second, a new standard in the WGQ 
Additional Standards manual, WGQ Standard No. 0.3.30, facilitates the 
posting of applicable scheduled quantity information for directly 
connected power plants, as part of the Gas Electric Coordination 
category. Types of data that could be provided include, Cycle 
Indicator, Effective Gas Day, Location, Location Name, Location County, 
Location State Abbreviation, Measurement Bases, Posting Date, Posting 
Time, RTO/ISO, and Total Scheduled Quantity. Third, a new standard in 
the WGQ Capacity Release Related Standards manual, WGQ Standard No. 
5.3.74, would support the inclusion of the geographic information of 
impacted areas, locations, or pipeline facilities by a transportation 
service provider when issuing a critical notice. If the above standards 
are implemented, the Commission's Office of Enforcement will use the 
data for general industry oversight.
    Internal Review: We have reviewed the requirements pertaining to 
business practices of interstate natural gas pipelines and made a 
preliminary determination that the proposed revisions are necessary to 
establish a more efficient and integrated pipeline network. These 
requirements conform to our plan for efficient information collection, 
communication, and management within the natural gas pipeline 
industries. We determined through our internal review that there is 
specific, objective support for the burden estimates associated with 
the information requirements.
    38. Interested persons may obtain information on the reporting 
requirements by contacting the following: Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426; email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7d391c091c3e11181c0f1c131e183d1b180f1e531a120b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="54103520351738313526353a373114323126377a333b22">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.
    39. Comments concerning the collection of information(s) and the 
associated burden estimate(s), should be sent to the Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs, the Office of Management and 
Budget, Washington, DC 20503: attention: Desk Officer for the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, phone: (202) 395-0710; fax: (202) 395-
4718. A copy of the comments on information collection should also be 
sent to the Commission, in Docket No. RM96-1-044 by any of the 
following methods:
    <bullet> eFiling at Commission's Website: <a href="https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp">https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp</a>;
    <bullet> U.S. Postal Service Mail: Persons unable to file 
electronically may mail similar pleadings to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426; or
    <bullet> Delivery of filings other than by eFiling or the U.S. 
Postal Service should be delivered to the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, MD 20852.

VII. Environmental Analysis

[[Page 52018]]

    40. The Commission is required to prepare an Environmental 
Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement for any action that may 
have a significant adverse effect on the human environment.\25\ The 
actions that we propose to take here fall within categorical exclusions 
in the Commission's regulations for rules that are clarifying, 
corrective, or procedural, for information gathering, analysis, and 
dissemination, and for rules regarding sales, exchange, and 
transportation of natural gas that require no construction of 
facilities.\26\ Therefore, an environmental review is unnecessary and 
has not been prepared as part of this NOPR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ Reguls. Implementing the Nat'l Envt'l Pol'y Act, Order No. 
486, 52 FR 47897 (Dec. 17, 1987), FERC Stats. & Regs. Preambles 
1986-1990 ] 30,783 (1987) (cross-referenced at 41 FERC ] 61,284).
    \26\ See 18 CFR 380.4(a)(2)(ii), 380.4(a)(5), 380.4(a)(27).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

VIII. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    41. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA) \27\ generally 
requires a description and analysis of proposed rules that will have 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
The Commission is not required to make such an analysis if proposed 
regulations would not have such an effect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ 5 U.S.C. 601-612.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    42. Approximately 193 interstate natural gas pipelines, both large 
and small, are potential respondents subject to the requirements 
proposed in this NOPR. Most of the natural gas pipelines regulated by 
the Commission do not fall within the RFA's definition of a small 
entity,\28\ which is currently defined for natural gas pipelines as a 
company that, in combination with its affiliates, has total annual 
receipts of $41.5 million or less.\29\ For the year 2022, only 14 
companies not affiliated with larger companies had annual revenues in 
combination with their affiliates of $41.5 million or less and 
therefore could be considered a small entity under the RFA. This 
represents about seven percent of the total universe of potential 
respondents that may have a significant burden imposed on them. We 
estimate that the one-time implementation cost of the proposals in this 
NOPR is $2,080,540 (or $10,780 per entity, regardless of entity 
size).\30\ We do not consider the estimated $10,780 impact per entity 
to be significant. Moreover, these requirements are designed to benefit 
all customers, including small businesses that must comply with them. 
Further, as noted above, incorporation by reference of consensus 
standards helps ensure the reasonableness of the standards by requiring 
that the standards draw support from a broad spectrum of industry 
participants representing all segments of the industry. Because of that 
representation and the fact that industry conducts business under these 
standards, the Commission has found value in incorporating standards 
that have the widest possible support.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ See 5 U.S.C. 601(3) citing section 3 of the Small Business 
Act (SBA), 15 U.S.C. 623. Section 3 of the SBA defines a ``small 
business concern'' as a business that is independently owned and 
operated, and that is not dominant in its field of operation.
    \29\ 13 CFR 121.201 (Subsector 486-Pipeline Transportation; 
North American Industry Classification System code 486210; Pipeline 
Transportation of Natural Gas) (2025) ``Annual Receipts'' are total 
income plus cost of goods sold.
    \30\ This number is derived by dividing the total cost figure by 
the number of respondents. $2,080,504/193 = $10,780.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    43. Accordingly, pursuant to section 605(b) of the RFA,\31\ the 
Commission certifies that the regulations proposed herein should not 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IX. Comment Procedures

    44. The Commission invites interested persons to submit comments on 
the matters and issues proposed in this notice to be incorporated by 
reference, including any related matters or alternative proposals that 
commenters may wish to discuss. Comments are due January 20, 2026. 
Comments must refer to Docket No. RM96-1-044, and must include the 
commenter's name, the organization they represent, if applicable, and 
their address in their comments. All comments will be placed in the 
Commission's public files and may be viewed, printed, or downloaded 
remotely as described in the Document Availability section below. 
Commenters on this proposal are not required to serve copies of their 
comments on other commenters.
    45. The Commission encourages comments to be filed electronically 
via the eFiling link on the Commission's website at <a href="https://www.ferc.gov">https://www.ferc.gov</a>. The Commission accepts most standard word processing 
formats. Documents created electronically using word processing 
software must be filed in native applications or print-to-PDF format 
and not in a scanned format. Commenters filing electronically do not 
need to make a paper filing.
    46. Commenters that are not able to file comments electronically 
may file an original of their comment by USPS mail or by courier-or 
other delivery services. For submission sent via USPS only, filings 
should be mailed to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Office of 
the Secretary, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. Submission of 
filings other than by USPS should be delivered to: Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, MD 20852.

X. Document Availability

    47. In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the 
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an 
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the 
internet through the Commission's Home Page (<a href="https://www.ferc.gov">https://www.ferc.gov</a>).
    48. From the Commission's Home Page on the internet, this 
information is available on eLibrary. The full text of this document is 
available on eLibrary in PDF and Microsoft Word format for viewing, 
printing, and/or downloading. To access this document in eLibrary, type 
the docket number excluding the last three digits of this document in 
the docket number field.
    49. User assistance is available for eLibrary and the Commission's 
website during normal business hours from FERC Online Support at 202-
502-6652 (toll free at 1-866-208-3676) or email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7b1d1e091814151712151e080e0b0b14090f3b1d1e0918551c140d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="472122352428292b2e292234323737283533072122352469202831">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>, or the Public Reference Room; phone (202) 
502-8371, TTY (202) 502-8659; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#25555047494c460b5740434057404b4640574a4a4865434057460b424a53"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="09797c6b65606a277b6c6f6c7b6c676a6c7b666664496f6c7b6a276e667f">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

XI. Regulatory Planning and Review

    50. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public 
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive 
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and 
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting 
flexibility. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) 
has determined this regulatory action is not a ``significant regulatory 
action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as amended. 
Accordingly, OIRA has not reviewed this regulatory action for 
compliance with the analytical requirements of Executive Order 12866.

List of Subjects in 18 CFR Part 284

    Continental shelf, Incorporation by reference, Natural gas, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.


[[Page 52019]]


    By direction of the Commission. Commissioner Chang is concurring 
with a separate statement attached.

    Issued: October 16, 2025.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Secretary.

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Commission proposes to amend 
18 CFR part 284 as follows.

PART 284--CERTAIN SALES AND TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL GAS UNDER THE 
NATURAL GAS POLICY ACT OF 1978 AND RELATED AUTHORITIES

0
1. The authority citation for part 284 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  15 U.S.C. 717-717z, 3301-3432; 42 U.S.C. 7101-7352; 
43 U.S.C. 1331-1356.

0
2. Amend Sec.  284.12 by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and (iv) through (vii); and
0
b. Removing paragraph (a)(1)(viii).
    The revisions read as follows:


Sec.  284.12  Standards for pipeline business operations and 
communications.

    (a) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (i) WGQ Additional Standards (Version 4.0, September 29, 2023), 
adding Standard No. 0.3.30, November 25, 2024;
    (ii) * * *
    (iii) * * *
    (iv) WGQ Invoicing Related Standards (Version 4.0, September 29, 
2023), with Minor Correction MC24002 applied May 17, 2024;
    (v) WGQ Quadrant Electronic Delivery Mechanism Related Standards 
(Version 4.0, September 29, 2023), revising Standard No. 4.3.23, 
November 25, 2024;
    (vi) WGQ Capacity Release Related Standards (Version 4.0, September 
29, 2023), adding Standard No. 5.3.74, November 25, 2024; and
    (vii) WGQ Cybersecurity Related Standards (Version 4.0, September 
29, 2023).
* * * * *
United States of America
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines
Docket No. RM96-1-044
(Issued October 16, 2025)
    CHANG, Commissioner, concurring:
    1. I concur with the Commission's order proposing to incorporate 
the North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB) gas-electric 
coordination standards into Commission-jurisdictional natural gas 
tariffs. I applaud NAESB and industry stakeholders for years of effort 
to address critical findings and recommendations from the Commission 
and North American Electricity Reliability Corporation's reports 
following Winter Storms Uri and Elliott. I write separately to urge 
NAESB and industry stakeholders to continue working to improve 
communication between transportation service providers (interstate 
pipelines) and generators and electricity system operators and to 
address outstanding gas-electric coordination matters.
    2. The NAESB standards proposed here exemplify the type of brick-
by-brick incremental improvements needed to address pressing gas-
electric coordination challenges. However, these proposed standards 
alone may not be enough to fully address the on-going challenges. More 
information sharing will improve situational awareness for grid 
operators and power generators, which would help improve service to 
customers, particularly when the systems are stressed. I therefore 
encourage NAESB and industry stakeholders to continue this work and 
further enhance such information-sharing standards, potentially 
including providing information related to the natural gas scheduled by 
generators that are not directly connected to interstate pipelines. I 
further encourage continued collaboration between pipelines, suppliers, 
natural gas marketers, and owners of upstream gas gathering systems to 
update pipeline operators and ultimately downstream gas users and 
electricity system operators of changes in system conditions, such as 
wellhead freezes, that could affect natural gas users and consumers.
    3. Given the criticality of natural gas for the electricity sector, 
combined with increasingly tight supply and demand balance, continued 
improvements in gas-electric coordination are paramount for ensuring 
reliability. In addition to providing feedback on the NAESB standards 
proposed in this NOPR, I urge stakeholders to provide comments in this 
proceeding on areas where additional improvements on gas-electric 
coordination would be valuable, particularly regarding information-
sharing along the chain of entities that physically control or have 
financial rights to natural gas deliveries, starting at the wellhead 
and ending at generators or the gas local distribution companies. 
Further, I welcome input from stakeholders to help inform the 
Commission's next steps as we address this critical issue.
    With these interests in mind, I respectfully concur.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Judy W. Chang,
Commissioner.

[FR Doc. 2025-20325 Filed 11-18-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on November 19, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.