Proposed Rule2025-20199

Rescission of OCC Guidelines Establishing Standards for Recovery Planning by Certain Large Insured National Banks, Insured Federal Savings Associations, and Insured Federal Branches

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
November 18, 2025

Issuing agencies

Treasury DepartmentComptroller of the Currency

Abstract

The OCC proposes amending 12 CFR part 30 by rescinding appendix E, OCC Guidelines Establishing Standards for Recovery Planning by Certain Large Insured National Banks, Insured Federal Savings, and Insured Federal Branches.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 220 (Tuesday, November 18, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 18, 2025)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 51587-51590]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-20199]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

12 CFR Part 30

[Docket ID OCC-2025-0339]
RIN 1557-AF40


Rescission of OCC Guidelines Establishing Standards for Recovery 
Planning by Certain Large Insured National Banks, Insured Federal 
Savings Associations, and Insured Federal Branches

AGENCY: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The OCC proposes amending 12 CFR part 30 by rescinding 
appendix E, OCC Guidelines Establishing Standards for Recovery Planning 
by Certain Large Insured National Banks,

[[Page 51588]]

Insured Federal Savings, and Insured Federal Branches.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 18, 2025.

ADDRESSES: Commenters are encouraged to submit comments through the 
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Please use the title ``Rescission of OCC 
Guidelines Establishing Standards for Recovery Planning by Certain 
Large Insured National Banks, Insured Federal Savings Associations, and 
Insured Federal Branches'' to facilitate the organization and 
distribution of the comments. You may submit comments by any of the 
following methods:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal--<a href="http://Regulations.gov">Regulations.gov</a>:
    Go to <a href="https://regulations.gov">https://regulations.gov</a>. Enter Docket ID ``OCC-2025-0339'' in 
the Search Box and click ``Search.'' Public comments can be submitted 
via the ``Comment'' box below the displayed document information or by 
clicking on the document title and then clicking the ``Comment'' box on 
the top-left side of the screen. For help with submitting effective 
comments, please click on ``Commenter's Checklist.'' For assistance 
with the <a href="http://Regulations.gov">Regulations.gov</a> site, please call 1-866-498-2945 (toll free) 
Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. EST or email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3a485f5d4f565b4e53555449525f564a5e5f49517a5d495b145d554c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a7d5c2c0d2cbc6d3cec8c9d4cfc2cbd7c3c2d4cce7c0d4c689c0c8d1">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.
    <bullet> Mail: Chief Counsel's Office, Attention: Comment 
Processing, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 400 7th Street 
SW, Suite 3E-218, Washington, DC 20219.
    <bullet> Hand Delivery/Courier: 400 7th Street SW, Suite 3E-218, 
Washington, DC 20219.
    Instructions: You must include ``OCC'' as the agency name and 
Docket ID ``OCC-2025-0339'' in your comment. In general, the OCC will 
enter all comments received into the docket and publish the comments on 
the <a href="http://Regulations.gov">Regulations.gov</a> website without change, including any business or 
personal information provided such as name and address information, 
email addresses, or phone numbers. Comments received, including 
attachments and other supporting materials, are part of the public 
record and subject to public disclosure. Do not include any information 
in your comment or supporting materials that you consider confidential 
or inappropriate for public disclosure.
    You may review comments and other related materials that pertain to 
this action by the following method:
    <bullet> Viewing Comments Electronically--<a href="http://Regulations.gov">Regulations.gov</a>:
    Go to <a href="https://regulations.gov">https://regulations.gov</a>. Enter Docket ID ``OCC-2025-0339'' in 
the Search Box and click ``Search.'' Click on the ``Documents'' tab and 
then the document's title. After clicking the document's title, click 
the ``Browse Comments'' tab. Comments can be viewed and filtered by 
clicking on the ``Sort By'' drop-down on the right side of the screen 
or the ``Refine Results'' options on the left side of the screen. 
Supporting materials can be viewed by clicking on the ``Documents'' tab 
and filtered by clicking on the ``Sort By'' drop-down on the right side 
of the screen or the ``Refine Documents Results'' options on the left 
side of the screen.'' For assistance with the <a href="http://Regulations.gov">Regulations.gov</a> site, 
please call 1-866-498-2945 (toll free) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. EST 
or email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fe8c9b998b929f8a9791908d969b928e9a9b8d95be998d9fd0999188"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="22504745574e43564b4d4c514a474e5246475149624551430c454d54">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.
    The docket may be viewed after the close of the comment period in 
the same manner as during the comment period.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Young, Chief Counsel's Office, 
(202) 649-5490; Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 400 7th 
Street SW, Washington, DC 20219. If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or 
have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access 
telecommunications relay services.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    On September 29, 2016, the OCC issued Guidelines Establishing 
Standards for Recovery Planning by Certain Large Insured National 
Banks, Insured Federal Savings Associations, and Insured Federal 
Branches (Guidelines).\1\ Under the Guidelines, an insured national 
bank, insured Federal savings association, or insured Federal branch 
subject to the standards (covered banks) should have a recovery plan 
that includes (1) quantitative or qualitative indicators of the risk or 
existence of severe stress that reflect its particular vulnerabilities; 
(2) a wide range of credible options that it could undertake in 
response to the stress to restore its financial strength and viability; 
and (3) an assessment and description of how these options would affect 
it. The Guidelines provide that a recovery plan should also address (1) 
the covered bank's overall organizational and legal entity structure 
and its interconnections and interdependencies; (2) procedures for 
escalating decision-making to senior management or the board of 
directors or an appropriate committee thereof (board); (3) management 
reports; (4) communication procedures; and (5) any other information 
the OCC communicates in writing. The Guidelines also set forth the 
responsibilities of management and the board with respect to the 
covered bank's recovery plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 81 FR 66791 (Sept. 29, 2016). The Guidelines are codified at 
12 CFR part 30, appendix E. They were issued pursuant to section 39 
of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. 1831p-1, which 
authorizes the OCC to prescribe enforceable safety and soundness 
standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The 2016 Guidelines applied to banks with total consolidated assets 
of $50 billion or more. In 2018, the OCC amended the Guidelines to 
raise the threshold to $250 billion based on its view, at that time, 
that these larger, more complex, and potentially more interconnected 
banks presented greater systemic risk to the financial system and would 
benefit most from recovery planning.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ 83 FR 66604 (Dec. 27, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In October 2024, the OCC amended the Guidelines to apply to banks 
with average total consolidated assets of $100 billion or more; 
incorporate a testing standard; and clarify the role of non-financial 
(including operational and strategic) risk in recovery planning.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 89 FR 84255 (Oct. 22, 2024).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Recission of Guidelines

    As a part of the ongoing assessment of the agency's supervisory 
framework to identify and eliminate unnecessary regulatory burden, the 
OCC is proposing to amend 12 CFR part 30 by rescinding the Guidelines 
contained in appendix E. The Guidelines cause covered banks to direct 
significant resources towards developing responsive documentation. In 
the OCC's experience, much of this documentation is, by its nature, 
scenario-dependent or otherwise conjectural and, therefore, is likely 
to be irrelevant or of limited utility when a covered bank faces 
stress. Appropriate recovery options and communication procedures, for 
example, may vary widely depending on the facts and circumstances of 
the particular stress scenario, including many that would be outside of 
the covered banks' control or ability to reliably predict. Likewise, 
impact assessments for such recovery options appear conjectural by 
nature and of limited utility in an actual stress scenario.
    The OCC has also observed that covered banks are well attuned to 
indicia of stress without regard to the presence of the recovery 
planning triggers and escalation procedure expectations of the 
Guidelines. Moreover, the OCC is concerned that escalation or 
communication procedures or other actions tied to such triggers may be 
unnecessary or inappropriate under the particular facts and 
circumstances of a stress scenario.

[[Page 51589]]

    More generally, the OCC believes that proper risk management should 
be a dynamic process that involves real-time responses to the facts and 
circumstances of a stress event or periods of stress. As such, the OCC 
would not necessarily expect adherence to recovery plans. Rather, the 
OCC would expect to closely monitor a covered bank as it assesses and 
responds to a stress event.\4\ Banks are in the business of risk 
management and are constantly assessing and adjusting their operations 
to adapt to evolving risk factors and conditions. Relieving covered 
banks of the obligation to engage in prescriptive recovery planning 
activities will further restore the risk management function to bank 
management's control and enhances resource availability that can be 
directed towards improving risk management operations and other 
productive activities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Although the OCC does not intend to discourage covered banks 
from developing plans to address stress scenarios, the OCC does not 
expect to require or review the appropriateness of such plans, nor 
does it expect for the covered bank to adhere to such plan unless it 
is the most consistent with the bank's safe and sound operations 
under the circumstances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, the OCC's existing safety and soundness standards require 
all insured depository institutions to have effective risk management 
processes, including in times of stress, that is commensurate with the 
size, complexity, and risk of their activities.\5\ In addition, the OCC 
expects financial institutions of all sizes to consider and 
appropriately address all material risks in their operating environment 
and be resilient to a range of risks.\6\ Further, the OCC expects that 
all institutions have a formal contingency funding plan that considers 
a range of possible stress scenarios, assesses the stability of funding 
during periods of stress, and provides for a broad range of funding 
sources under adverse conditions.\7\ The duplication of these 
principles in the Guidelines can be eliminated without undermining the 
structural integrity of prudential regulation of covered banks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Section 39 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. 
1831p-1 requires the OCC to prescribe safety and soundness standards 
for insured depository institutions. Such standards were implemented 
by rule in 12 CFR part 30, appendix A. These guidelines address, 
among other things, operational and managerial standards relating to 
(1) internal controls, information systems; (2) internal audit 
systems; (3) loan documentation; (4) credit underwriting; (5) 
interest rate risk exposure; (6) asset growth; (7) asset quality; 
(8) earnings; and (9) compensation.
    \6\ See, e.g., the Bank Supervision Process booklet of the 
Comptroller's Handbook, <a href="https://www.occ.gov/publications-and-resources/publications/comptrollers-handbook/files/bank-supervision-process/index-bank-supervision-process.html">https://www.occ.gov/publications-and-resources/publications/comptrollers-handbook/files/bank-supervision-process/index-bank-supervision-process.html</a>.
    \7\ See Addendum to the Interagency Policy Statement on Funding 
and Liquidity Risk Management: Importance of Contingency Funding 
Plans, OCC Bulletin 2023-25, which can be accessed here: <a href="https://www.occ.gov/news-issuances/news-releases/2023/nr-ia-2023-82a.pdf">https://www.occ.gov/news-issuances/news-releases/2023/nr-ia-2023-82a.pdf</a>; 
see also Interagency Policy Statement on Funding and Liquidity Risk 
Management, Federal Reserve SR 10-6 (March 17, 2010), FDIC FIL-13-
2010 (April 10, 2010), and OCC Bulletin 2010-13 (March 22, 2010). 
These individual agency issuances released the 2010 Interagency 
Policy Statement on Funding and Liquidity Risk Management, which can 
be accessed here: <a href="https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2010-03-22/pdf/2010-6137.pdf">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2010-03-22/pdf/2010-6137.pdf</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, unlike statutorily mandated resolution planning,\8\ there 
is no statutory requirement that covered banks undertake recovery 
planning. Rather, the Guidelines impose an unnecessary regulatory 
burden on covered banks that consumes valuable resources and fails to 
account for management's ability to assess and manage risks prior to 
and during periods of stress. Therefore, the OCC is proposing to amend 
12 CFR part 30 by rescinding the Guidelines contained in appendix E.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See 12 U.S.C. 5365.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Request for Feedback

    Question 1. Should the OCC codify the contingency funding plan 
expectations set forth in the Interagency Policy Statement on Funding 
and Liquidity Risk Management and the Addendum to the Interagency 
Policy Statement on Funding and Liquidity Risk Management: Importance 
of Contingency Funding Plans? If so, should the codified contingency 
funding plan requirements apply to all OCC-regulated institutions or a 
subset of regulated entities? \9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See supra note 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Request for Comment

    The OCC encourages comment on any aspect of this proposal and 
especially on the specific issues discussed in this SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION section.

V. Regulatory Analysis

Paperwork Reduction Act

    Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA),\10\ the OCC may 
not conduct or sponsor, and a respondent is not required to respond to, 
an information collection unless it displays a currently valid Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. The OCC has reviewed the 
notice of proposed rulemaking and determined that it would not create 
any new or revise any existing, collections of information under the 
PRA and therefore, require no PRA filings, other than a discontinuance 
request to OMB for the currently approved ``Guidelines Establishing 
Standards for Recovery Planning by Certain Large Insured National 
Banks, Insured Federal Savings Associations, and Insured Federal 
Branches (1557-0333)'' information collection following the 
finalization of the rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 44 U.S.C. 3501 et. seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Title of Information Collection: OCC Guidelines Establishing 
Standards for Recovery Planning by Certain Large Insured National 
Banks, Insured Federal Savings Associations, and Insured Federal 
Branches.
    OMB Control Number: 1557-0333.
    Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit organizations.
    Description: Twelve CFR part 30, appendix E, current Guidelines 
apply to national banks, insured Federal savings associations, and 
insured Federal branches of foreign banks with total consolidated 
assets of $100 billion or more. The OMB previously approved the 
collection of information in the current Guidelines, which are found at 
paragraphs II.B., II.C., and III. Specifically, paragraph II.B. lists 
the elements of the recovery plan, which are an overview of the covered 
bank; triggers; options for recovery; impact assessments; escalation 
procedures; management reports; communication procedures; and other 
information. Paragraph II.C. addresses the relationship of the plan to 
other covered bank processes and coordination with other plans, 
including the processes and plans of its bank holding company. 
Paragraph III. outlines management and the board's responsibilities. 
The Guidelines also include a testing standard, which provides that a 
covered bank should test its recovery plan.
    Additionally, the Guidelines clarify the role of non-financial risk 
(including operational and strategic risk) in recovery planning.
Current Burden
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Total Number of Respondents: 21.
    Total Burden per Respondent: 32,017 hours.
    Total Burden for Collection: 672,360 hours.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., 
requires an agency, in connection with a proposed rule, to prepare an 
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis describing the impact of the 
rule on small entities (defined by the Small Business Administration 
(SBA) for purposes of the RFA to include commercial banks and savings 
institutions with total assets of $850 million or less and trust 
companies with total assets of $47 million or less) or to

[[Page 51590]]

certify that the proposed rule would not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. However, under 
section 605(b) of the RFA, this analysis is not required if an agency 
certifies that the rule would not have a significant economic impact on 
a substantial number of small entities and publishes its certification 
and a short explanatory statement in the Federal Register along with 
its rule.
    The OCC certifies that the proposed recission of part 30, appendix 
E, if adopted, will not have a significant impact on a substantial 
number of small entities. Twelve CFR part 30, appendix E currently 
applies to only those insured national bank, insured Federal savings 
association, or insured Federal branch with average total consolidated 
assets of $100 billion or more. Therefore, the recission of appendix E 
would impact no small entities supervised by the OCC. Accordingly, an 
initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not required.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

    The OCC analyzed the proposed rule under the factors set forth in 
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1532). Under 
this analysis, the OCC considered whether the proposed rule includes a 
Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local, and 
Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 
million or more (currently $187 million, as adjusted annually for 
inflation) in any one year. The OCC has determined that the cost 
savings associated with the rescission of the Guidelines' mandates will 
be approximately $20 million. Therefore, the OCC concludes that the 
recission of 12 CFR part 30, appendix E, will not result in an 
expenditure of $187 million or more annually by State, local, and 
Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector.

Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994

    Pursuant to section 302(a) of the Riegle Community Development and 
Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994,\11\ in determining the effective 
date and administrative compliance requirements for new regulations 
that impose additional reporting, disclosure, or other requirements on 
insured depository institutions, the OCC must consider, consistent with 
the principles of safety and soundness and the public interest: (1) any 
administrative burdens that the proposed rule would place on depository 
institutions, including small depository institutions, and customers of 
depository institutions and (2) the benefits of the proposed rule. This 
rulemaking would not impose additional reporting, disclosure, or other 
requirements on insured depository institutions. Therefore, section 
302(a) of the Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement 
Act of 1994 does not apply to this rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 12 U.S.C. 4802(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Providing Accountability Through Transparency Act of 2023

    The Providing Accountability Through Transparency Act of 2023 \12\ 
requires that a notice of proposed rulemaking include the internet 
address of a summary of not more than 100 words in length of a proposed 
rule, in plain language, that shall be posted on the internet website 
<a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 12 U.S.C. 553(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rulemaking would rescind the OCC's Guidelines 
Establishing Standards for Recovery Planning by Certain Large Insured 
National Banks, Insured Federal Savings Associations, and Insured 
Federal Branches contained in appendix E of 12 CFR part 30.
    The proposal and the required summary can be found at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> by searching for Docket ID OCC-2025-0339 and 
<a href="https://occ.gov/topics/laws-and-regulations/occ-regulations/proposed-issuances/index-proposed-issuances.html">https://occ.gov/topics/laws-and-regulations/occ-regulations/proposed-issuances/index-proposed-issuances.html</a>.

Executive Orders 12866 and 14192

    Executive Order 12866, titled ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' 
as amended, provides that the Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs (OIRA), will review all ``significant regulatory actions'' as 
defined therein. OIRA has determined that this proposal is not a 
``significant regulatory action'' for purposes of Executive Order 
12866.
    Executive Order 14192, titled ``Unleashing Prosperity Through 
Deregulation,'' separately requires that an agency, unless prohibited 
by law, identify at least 10 existing regulations to be repealed when 
the agency publicly proposes for notice and comment or otherwise 
promulgates a new regulation with total costs greater than zero. 
Executive Order 14192 further requires that new incremental costs 
associated with new regulations shall, to the extent permitted by law, 
be offset by the elimination of existing costs associated with at least 
ten prior regulations. The OCC expects the proposed rule will be a 
deregulatory action under Executive Order 14192.

List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 30

    Administrative practice and procedure, National banks, Reporting 
and recordkeeping requirements.

PART 30--SAFETY AND SOUNDNESS STANDARDS

Appendix E to Part 30 [Removed]

0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, and under the authority of 12 
U.S.C. 93a and 12 U.S.C. 1831p-1, the Office of the Comptroller of the 
Currency proposes to remove Appendix E to part 30.

Jonathan V. Gould,
Comptroller of the Currency.
[FR Doc. 2025-20199 Filed 11-17-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-33-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on November 18, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.