Rule2025-19916

Oxirane, Methyl-, Polymer With Oxirane, Monobutyl Ether and Oxirane, 2-Methyl, Polymer With Oxirane, Monomethyl Ether in Pesticide Formulations; Exemption From the Requirement for a Tolerance

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
November 17, 2025
Effective
November 17, 2025

Issuing agencies

Environmental Protection Agency

Abstract

This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of oxirane, methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monobutyl ether (CAS Reg. No. 9038-95-3) minimum number average molecular weight 800 Daltons and a limitation of 10% for oxirane, 2- methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monomethyl ether (CAS Reg. No. 9063-06- 3) minimum number average molecular weight 800 Daltons as inert ingredients when used as an inert ingredient (adjuvant, carrier, diluent or solvent) on growing crops and raw agricultural commodities pre- and post-harvest under 40 CFR 180.910 and to animals under 40 CFR 180.930. Spring Regulatory Sciences on behalf of Evonik Corporation submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting establishment of an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to establish a maximum permissible level for residues of oxirane, methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monobutyl ether and oxirane, 2-methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monomethyl ether, when used in accordance with the terms of those exemptions.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 219 (Monday, November 17, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 219 (Monday, November 17, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51164-51168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-19916]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2023-0003; FRL-12980-01-OCSPP]


Oxirane, Methyl-, Polymer With Oxirane, Monobutyl Ether and 
Oxirane, 2-Methyl, Polymer With Oxirane, Monomethyl Ether in Pesticide 
Formulations; Exemption From the Requirement for a Tolerance

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement 
of a tolerance for residues of oxirane, methyl-, polymer with oxirane, 
monobutyl ether (CAS Reg. No. 9038-95-3) minimum number average 
molecular weight 800 Daltons and a limitation of 10% for oxirane, 2- 
methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monomethyl ether (CAS Reg. No. 9063-06-
3) minimum number average molecular weight 800 Daltons as inert 
ingredients when used as an inert ingredient (adjuvant, carrier, 
diluent or solvent) on growing crops and raw agricultural commodities 
pre- and post-harvest under 40 CFR 180.910 and to animals under 40 CFR 
180.930. Spring Regulatory Sciences on behalf of Evonik Corporation 
submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
Act (FFDCA), requesting establishment of an exemption from the 
requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to 
establish a maximum permissible level for residues of oxirane, methyl-, 
polymer with oxirane, monobutyl ether and oxirane, 2-methyl-, polymer 
with oxirane, monomethyl ether, when used in accordance with the terms 
of those exemptions.

DATES: This regulation is effective November 17, 2025. Objections and 
requests for hearings must be received on or before January 16, 2026 
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of this document).

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket 
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2023-0003, is available online at 
<a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. Additional information about dockets 
generally, along with instructions for visiting the docket in-person, 
is available at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets">https://www.epa.gov/dockets</a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Smith, Registration Division 
(7505T), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone 
number: (202) 566-1030; email address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#feacbab8acb0918a979d9b8dbe9b8e9fd0999188"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c5e484a5e426378656f697f4c697c6d226b637a">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Executive Summary

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an 
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. 
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System 
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a 
guide to help readers determine whether this document might apply to 
them:
    <bullet> Crop production (NAICS code 111).
    <bullet> Animal production (NAICS code 112).
    <bullet> Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
    <bullet> Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
    If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this 
action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. What is EPA's authority for taking this action?

    EPA is issuing this rulemaking under section 408 of the Federal 
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a. FFDCA section 
408(c)(2)(A)(i) allows EPA to establish an exemption from the 
requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical 
residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that the exemption is 
``safe.'' FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) defines ``safe'' to mean that 
``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from 
aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including all 
anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there 
is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through drinking 
water and in residential settings but does not include occupational 
exposure. Pursuant to FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), in establishing or 
maintaining in effect an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance, 
EPA must take into account the factors set forth in FFDCA section 
408(b)(2)(C), which require EPA to give special consideration to 
exposure of infants and children to the pesticide chemical residue in 
establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable 
certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from 
aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . . .'' 
Additionally, FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D) requires that the Agency 
consider, among other things, ``available information concerning the 
cumulative effects of a particular pesticide's residues'' and ``other 
substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''

C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?

    Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file 
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a 
hearing on those objections. If you fail to file an objection to the 
final rule within the time period specified in the final rule, you will 
have waived the right to raise any issues resolved in the final rule. 
You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in 
accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure 
proper receipt by EPA, you must identify the docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OPP-2023-0003 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. 
All objections and requests for a hearing must be in writing and must 
be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before January 16, 2026.
    EPA's Office of Administrative Law Judges (OALJ), in which the 
Hearing Clerk is housed, urges parties to file and serve documents by 
electronic means only, notwithstanding any other particular 
requirements set forth in other procedural rules governing those 
proceedings. See ``Revised Order Urging Electronic Filing and 
Service,'' dated June 22, 2023, which can be found at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-06/2023-06-22%20-%20revised%20order%20urging%20electronic%20filing%20and%20service.pdf">https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-06/2023-06-22%20-%20revised%20order%20urging%20electronic%20filing%20and%20service.pdf</a>. 
Although EPA's regulations require submission via U.S. Mail or hand 
delivery, EPA intends to treat submissions filed via electronic means 
as properly filed submissions; therefore, EPA believes the preference 
for submission via electronic means will not be prejudicial. When 
submitting documents to the OALJ electronically, a person should 
utilize the OALJ e-filing system at <a href="https://yosemite.epa.gov/oa/eab/eab-alj_upload.nsf">https://yosemite.epa.gov/oa/eab/eab-alj_upload.nsf</a>.
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the 
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of 
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for 
inclusion in the public docket at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. Follow 
the online instructions for submitting

[[Page 51165]]

comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to 
be CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 
If you wish to include CBI in your request, please follow the 
applicable instructions at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets#rules">https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets#rules</a> and clearly mark the information that you claim to be 
CBI. Information not marked confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may 
be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice.

II. Petition for Exemption

    In the Federal Register of February 23, 2023 (88 FR 11401, FRL-
10579-01-OCSPP), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408, 
21 U.S.C. 346a, announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP IN-
11716) by Spring Regulatory Sciences (6620 Cypresswood Dr., Suite 250, 
Spring, TX 77379) on behalf of Evonik Corporation (P.O. Box 34628, 
Richmond, Virginia 23234). The petition requested that 40 CFR be 
amended by establishing an exemption from the requirement of a 
tolerance for residues of oxirane, methyl-, polymer with oxirane, 
monobutyl ether (CAS Reg. No. 9038-95-3) minimum number average 
molecular weight 800 Da and oxirane, 2-methyl-, polymer with oxirane, 
monomethyl ether (CAS Reg. No. 9063-06-3) minimum number average 
molecular weight 800 Da when used as an inert ingredient (adjuvant, 
carrier, diluent or solvent) in pesticide formulations applied to 
growing crops or raw agricultural commodities pre- and post-harvest 
under 40 CFR 180.910 and in/on animals under 40 CFR 180.930. That 
document referenced a summary of the petition prepared by Spring 
Regulatory Sciences on behalf of Evonik Corporation, the petitioner, 
which is available in the docket. There were no comments received in 
response to the notice of filing.

III. Inert Ingredient Definition

    Inert ingredients are all ingredients that are not active 
ingredients as defined in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are not 
limited to, the following types of ingredients (except when they have a 
pesticidal efficacy of their own): Solvents such as alcohols and 
hydrocarbons; surfactants such as polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty 
acids; carriers such as clay and diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as 
carrageenan and modified cellulose; wetting, spreading, and dispersing 
agents; propellants in aerosol dispensers; microencapsulating agents; 
and emulsifiers. The term ``inert'' is not intended to imply 
nontoxicity; the ingredient may or may not be chemically active. 
Generally, EPA has exempted inert ingredients from the requirement of a 
tolerance based on the low toxicity of the individual inert 
ingredients.

IV. Final Tolerance Action

A. EPA's Safety Determination

    EPA establishes exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance only 
in those cases where it can be clearly demonstrated that the risks from 
aggregate exposure to pesticide chemical residues under reasonably 
foreseeable circumstances will pose no harm to human health. In order 
to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to pesticide inert 
ingredients, the Agency considers the toxicity of the inert in 
conjunction with possible exposure to residues of the inert ingredient 
through food, drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as 
a result of pesticide use in residential settings. If EPA is able to 
determine that a finite tolerance is not necessary to ensure that there 
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate 
exposure to the inert ingredient, an exemption from the requirement of 
a tolerance may be established.
    Consistent with FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(A), and the factors 
specified in FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), EPA has reviewed the available 
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this 
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a 
determination on aggregate exposure for oxirane, methyl-, polymer with 
oxirane, monobutyl ether and oxirane, 2-methyl-, polymer with oxirane, 
monomethyl ether including exposure resulting from the exemption 
established by this action. EPA's assessment of exposures and risks 
associated with oxirane, methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monobutyl ether 
and oxirane, 2-methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monomethyl ether follows.

B. Toxicological Profile

    EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered their 
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of 
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered 
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities 
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and 
children. Specific information on the studies received and the nature 
of the adverse effects caused by oxirane, methyl-, polymer with 
oxirane, monobutyl ether and oxirane, 2-methyl-, polymer with oxirane, 
monomethyl ether as well as the no-observed-adverse-effect-level 
(NOAEL) and the lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level (LOAEL) from the 
toxicity studies are discussed in this unit.
    The toxicological database of oxirane, methyl-, polymer with 
oxirane, monobutyl ether and oxirane, 2-methyl-, polymer with oxirane, 
monomethyl ether is supported by data regarding butoxypolypropylene 
glycol, dipropylene glycol monobutyl ether, and poly(oxy-1,2-
ethanediyl), [alpha]-hydro-[omega]-hydroxy- ethane-1,2-diol, 
ethoxylated. EPA has determined that it is appropriate to bridge the 
aforementioned surrogate chemicals data to assess oxirane, methyl-, 
polymer with oxirane, monobutyl ether and oxirane, 2-methyl-, polymer 
with oxirane, monomethyl ether due to similarities in the structures, 
composition, and physical/chemical properties.
    Based on the available read-across data, oxirane, methyl-, polymer 
with oxirane, monobutyl ether and oxirane, 2-methyl-, polymer with 
oxirane, monomethyl ether exhibit low levels of acute toxicity via the 
oral, dermal, and inhalation routes of exposure. They are expected to 
be slightly irritating to the skin and moderately irritating to the 
eyes, but not skin sensitizers. In repeated-dose toxicity studies, the 
kidneys and liver are the major target organs. However, the effects 
observed in oral toxicity studies occurred at doses at or above the 
limit dose and thus, are not considered relevant for risk assessment 
purposes. Based on the results from a repeated-dose inhalation study, 
inhalation is the route of toxicological concern for oxirane, methyl-, 
polymer with oxirane, monobutyl ether and oxirane, 2-methyl-, polymer 
with oxirane, monomethyl ether, with portal-of-entry effects observed. 
There is no evidence of susceptibility in the available developmental 
toxicity study. Concern for carcinogenicity is low, based on negative 
results in mutagenicity and genotoxicity studies and lack of effects in 
the available chronic study.

B. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern

    Once a pesticide's toxicological profile is determined, EPA 
identifies toxicological points of departure (POD) and levels of 
concern to use in evaluating the risk posed by human exposure to the 
pesticide. For hazards that have a threshold below which there is no 
appreciable risk, the toxicological POD is used as the basis for 
derivation of reference values for risk assessment.

[[Page 51166]]

PODs are developed based on a careful analysis of the doses in each 
toxicological study to determine the dose at which no adverse effects 
are observed (the NOAEL) and the lowest dose at which adverse effects 
of concern are identified (the LOAEL). Uncertainty/safety factors are 
used in conjunction with the POD to calculate a safe exposure level, 
generally referred to as a population-adjusted dose (PAD) or a 
reference dose (RfD), and a safe margin of exposure (MOE). For non-
threshold risks, EPA assumes that any amount of exposure will lead to 
some degree of risk. Thus, the Agency estimates risk in terms of the 
probability of an occurrence of the adverse effect expected in a 
lifetime. For more information on the general principles EPA uses in 
risk characterization and a complete description of the risk assessment 
process, see <a href="https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/overview-risk-assessment-pesticide-program">https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/overview-risk-assessment-pesticide-program</a>.
    An acute dietary endpoint was not selected because no effect 
attributable to a single dose was identified in the database. No 
chronic dietary, incidental oral, or dermal endpoint was selected 
because the effects observed in the oral studies occurred at doses 
above the limit dose, which are not relevant for risk assessment 
purposes. The short-term and intermediate-term inhalation endpoints are 
derived from the two-week inhalation toxicity study in rats, with a 
NOAEL of 52 mg/m\3\ and a LOAEL of 512 mg/m\3\, based on minor ocular/
nasal irritation. This represents the lowest NOAEL in the database in 
the most sensitive species. The standard uncertainty factors (UFs) were 
applied to account for interspecies (10x) and intraspecies (10x) 
variations. The default value of 100% was used for the inhalation 
absorption factor.

C. Exposure Assessment

    1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. In evaluating dietary 
exposure to oxirane, methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monobutyl ether and 
oxirane, 2-methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monomethyl ether, EPA 
considered exposure under the proposed exemption from the requirement 
of a tolerance. EPA assessed dietary exposures from oxirane, methyl-, 
polymer with oxirane, monobutyl ether and oxirane, 2- methyl-, polymer 
with oxirane, monomethyl ether in food as follows:
    Dietary exposure (food and drinking water) to oxirane, methyl-, 
polymer with oxirane, monobutyl ether and oxirane, 2-methyl-, polymer 
with oxirane, monomethyl ether may occur following ingestion of foods 
with residues from their use in accordance with this exemption. 
However, a quantitative dietary exposure assessment was not conducted 
since a toxicological endpoint for risk assessment was not identified.
    2. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is 
used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary 
exposure (e.g., textiles (clothing and diapers), carpets, swimming 
pools, and hard surface disinfection on walls, floors, tables).
    Oxirane, methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monobutyl ether and 
oxirane, 2-methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monomethyl ether may be 
present in pesticide and non-pesticide products that may be used in and 
around the home. Therefore, screening level residential handler and 
post-application risk assessments have been performed for common 
residential exposure scenarios, using assumptions detailed in the 2012 
Residential Standard Operating Procedures (available at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/overview-risk-assessment-pesticide-program">https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/overview-risk-assessment-pesticide-program</a>.)
    3. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of 
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when 
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the 
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative 
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances 
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
    EPA has not found oxirane, methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monobutyl 
ether and oxirane, 2-methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monomethyl ether to 
share a common mechanism of toxicity with any other substances, and 
oxirane, methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monobutyl ether and oxirane, 2- 
methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monomethyl ether do not appear to 
produce a toxic metabolite produced by other substances. For the 
purposes of this tolerance exemption, therefore, EPA has assumed that 
oxirane, methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monobutyl ether and oxirane, 2-
methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monomethyl ether do not have a common 
mechanism of toxicity with other substances. For information regarding 
EPA's efforts to determine which chemicals have a common mechanism of 
toxicity and to evaluate the cumulative effects of such chemicals, see 
EPA's website at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/cumulative-assessment-risk-pesticides">https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/cumulative-assessment-risk-pesticides</a>.

D. Additional Safety Factor for the Protection of Infants and Children

    Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply an 
additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety for infants and children in 
the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal 
toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity and exposure 
unless EPA determines based on reliable data that a different margin of 
safety will be safe for infants and children. This additional margin of 
safety is commonly referred to as the FQPA Safety Factor (SF). In 
applying this provision, EPA either retains the default value of 10X, 
or uses a different additional safety factor when reliable data 
available to EPA support the choice of a different factor.
    Based on the evaluation of available toxicity studies, there is low 
concern for pre- and postnatal susceptibility from exposure to oxirane, 
methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monobutyl ether and oxirane, 2-methyl-, 
polymer with oxirane, monomethyl ether. The FQPA safety factor has been 
reduced to 1X because: (1) the toxicity database is adequate to 
characterize potential pre- and postnatal risk; (2) no developmental or 
reproductive effects were observed in the available developmental 
study; (3) no evidence of neurotoxicity was observed in the database; 
and (4) the assumptions for the exposure assessment are conservative 
and unlikely to underestimate risk.

E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety

    EPA determines whether acute and chronic dietary pesticide 
exposures are safe by comparing aggregate exposure estimates to the 
acute PAD (aPAD) and chronic PAD (cPAD). For linear cancer risks, EPA 
calculates the lifetime probability of acquiring cancer given the 
estimated aggregate exposure. Short-, intermediate-, and chronic-term 
risks are evaluated by comparing the estimated aggregate food, water, 
and residential exposure to the appropriate PODs to ensure that an 
adequate MOE exists.
    1. Acute risk. An acute aggregate risk assessment takes into 
account acute exposure estimates from dietary consumption of food and 
drinking water. No adverse effect resulting from a single oral exposure 
was identified and no acute dietary endpoint was selected. Therefore, 
oxirane, methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monobutyl ether and oxirane, 2-
methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monomethyl ether are not expected to 
pose an acute risk.

[[Page 51167]]

    2. Chronic risk. A chronic aggregate risk assessment considers 
exposure estimates from chronic dietary consumption of food and 
drinking water. Although dietary exposure via food and drinking water 
is anticipated, no chronic dietary endpoints of concern were 
identified; therefore, a quantitative dietary exposure assessment was 
not conducted and oxirane, methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monobutyl 
ether and oxirane, 2-methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monomethyl ether 
are not expected to pose a chronic aggregate risk.
    1. Short- and intermediate term risks. Short- and intermediate term 
aggregate exposures take into account short- and intermediate-term 
residential exposures plus chronic exposures to food and water 
(considered to be a background exposure level).
    Oxirane, methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monobutyl ether and 
oxirane, 2-methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monomethyl ether may be used 
as inert ingredients in pesticide products that are registered for uses 
that could result in short- and intermediate-term residential 
exposures. However, no endpoints were selected for chronic dietary or 
dermal exposures. Therefore, the aggregate risk assessment consists of 
only the short- and intermediate-term residential inhalation handler 
exposures, with MOEs ranging from 2,600 to 59,000. As the level of 
concern is for MOEs that are lower than 100, these MOEs are not of 
concern.

F. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

    An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since 
the Agency is not establishing a numerical tolerance for residues of 
oxirane, methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monobutyl ether and oxirane, 2- 
methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monomethyl ether in or on any food 
commodities. EPA is establishing a limitation on the amount of oxirane, 
2-methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monomethyl ether that may be used in 
pesticide formulations applied pre-harvest. This limitation will be 
enforced through the pesticide registration process under the Federal 
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (``FIFRA''), 7 U.S.C. 136 
et seq. EPA will not register any pesticide formulation for food use 
that exceeds 10% oxirane, 2-methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monomethyl 
ether in the final pesticide formulation.

G. Conclusions

    Therefore, an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is 
established for residues of oxirane, methyl-, polymer with oxirane, 
monobutyl ether (CAS Reg. No. 9038-95-3) minimum number average 
molecular weight 800 Daltons and a limitation of 10% for oxirane, 2-
methyl-, polymer with oxirane, monomethyl ether (CAS Reg. No. 9063-06-
3) minimum number average molecular weight 800 Daltons when used as an 
inert ingredient (adjuvant, carrier, diluent or solvent) in pesticide 
formulations applied to growing crops and raw agricultural commodities 
after harvest under 40 CFR 180.910 and when used to animals under 40 
CFR 180.930.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders 
can be found at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/regulations/and-executive-orders">https://www.epa.gov/regulations/and-executive-orders</a>.

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review

    This action is exempt from review under Executive Order 12866 (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993), because it establishes or modifies a 
pesticide tolerance or a tolerance exemption under FFDCA section 408 in 
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from 
review under Executive Order 12866.

B. Executive Order 14192: Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation

    Executive Order 14192 (90 FR 9065, February 6, 2025) does not apply 
because actions that establish a tolerance under FFDCA section 408 are 
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    This action does not impose an information collection burden under 
the PRA 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., because it does not contain any 
information collection activities.

D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    This action is not subject to the RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. The RFA 
applies only to rules subject to notice and comment rulemaking 
requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 
553, or any other statute. This rule is not subject to the APA but is 
subject to FFDCA section 408(d), which does not require notice and 
comment rulemaking to take this action in response to a petition.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain an unfunded mandate of $100 million or 
more (in 1995 dollars and adjusted annually for inflation) as described 
in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely 
affect small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any 
State, local or tribal governments or the private sector.

F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it will 
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship 
between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments

    This action does not have tribal implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because it will 
not have substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the 
relationship between the Federal Government and the Indian Tribes, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
Government and Indian Tribes.

H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental 
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, 
April 23, 1997) because it is not a significant regulatory action under 
section 3(f)(1) of Executive Order 12866 (See Unit VI.A.), and because 
EPA does not believe the environmental health or safety risks addressed 
by this action present a disproportionate risk to children. However, 
EPA's 2021 Policy on Children's Health applies to this action.
    This rule finalizes tolerance actions under the FFDCA, which 
requires EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and 
children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance 
and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will 
result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide 
chemical residue . . .'' (FFDCA 408(b)(2)(C)). The Agency's 
consideration is documented in the pesticide-specific registration 
review documents, located in the applicable docket at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>.

[[Page 51168]]

I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355) 
(May 22, 2001) because it is not a significant regulatory action under 
Executive Order 12866.

J. National Technology Transfer Advancement Act (NTTAA)

    This action does not involve technical standards that would require 
Agency consideration under NTTAA section 12(d), 15 U.S.C. 272.

K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)

    This action is subject to the CRA, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., and EPA 
will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the 
Comptroller General of the United States. This action does not meet the 
criteria set forth in 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: October 10, 2025.
Charles Smith,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR 
chapter I as follows:

PART 180--TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES 
IN FOOD

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.


0
2. In Sec.  180.910, amend Table 1 to 180.910 by adding, in 
alphabetical order, an entry for ``oxirane, methyl-, polymer with 
oxirane, monobutyl ether'' and ``oxirane, 2-methyl-, polymer with 
oxirane, monomethyl ether'' to read as follows:


Sec.  180.910  Inert ingredients used pre- and post-harvest; exemptions 
from the requirement of a tolerance.

* * * * *

                           Table 1 to 180.910
------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Inert ingredients               Limits               Uses
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                              * * * * * * *
Oxirane, methyl-, polymer with    None..............  adjuvant, carrier,
 oxirane, monobutyl ether (CAS                         diluent or
 Reg. No. 9038-95-3) minimum                           solvent.
 number average molecular weight
 800 Daltons.
Oxirane, 2-methyl-, polymer with  Not more than 10%   adjuvant, carrier,
 oxirane, monomethyl ether (CAS    of pesticide        diluent or
 Reg. No. 9063-06-3) minimum       formulations.       solvent.
 number average molecular weight
 800 Daltons.
 
                              * * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------



0
3. In Sec.  180.930, amend Table 1 to 180.930 by adding, in 
alphabetical order, an entry for ``oxirane, methyl-, polymer with 
oxirane, monobutyl ether'' and ``oxirane, 2-methyl-, polymer with 
oxirane, monomethyl ether'' to read as follows:


Sec.  180.930  Inert ingredients applied to animals; exemptions from 
the requirement of a tolerance.

* * * * *

                           Table 1 to 180.930
------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Inert ingredients               Limits               Uses
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                              * * * * * * *
Oxirane, methyl-, polymer with    None..............  adjuvant, carrier,
 oxirane, monobutyl ether (CAS                         diluent or
 Reg. No. 9038-95-3) minimum                           solvent.
 number average molecular weight
 800 Daltons.
Oxirane, 2-methyl-, polymer with  Not more than 10%   adjuvant, carrier,
 oxirane, monomethyl ether (CAS    of pesticide        diluent or
 Reg. No. 9063-06-3) minimum       formulations.       solvent.
 number average molecular weight
 800 Daltons.
 
                              * * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------


[FR Doc. 2025-19916 Filed 11-14-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on November 17, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.