Rule2025-19910

Chlorantraniliprole; Pesticide Tolerance for Emergency Exemption

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
November 17, 2025
Effective
November 17, 2025

Issuing agencies

Environmental Protection Agency

Abstract

This regulation establishes a time-limited tolerance for residues of chlorantraniliprole, including its metabolites and degradates, in or on rice, grain. This action is in response to EPA's granting of an emergency exemption under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) authorizing use of the pesticide on rice. This regulation establishes a maximum permissible level for residues of chlorantraniliprole. The time-limited tolerance expires on December 31, 2028.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 219 (Monday, November 17, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 219 (Monday, November 17, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51118-51123]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-19910]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2025-0284; FRL-12973-01]


Chlorantraniliprole; Pesticide Tolerance for Emergency Exemption

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a time-limited tolerance for 
residues of chlorantraniliprole, including its metabolites and 
degradates, in or on rice, grain. This action is in response to EPA's 
granting of an emergency exemption under the Federal Insecticide, 
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) authorizing use of the pesticide 
on rice. This regulation establishes a maximum permissible level for 
residues of chlorantraniliprole. The time-limited tolerance expires on 
December 31, 2028.

DATES: This rule is effective November 17, 2025. Objections and 
requests for hearings must be received on or before January 16, 2026 
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

[[Page 51119]]


ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket 
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2025-0284, is available at 
<a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. Additional information about dockets 
generally, along with instructions for visiting the docket in person, 
is available at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets">https://www.epa.gov/dockets</a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Smith, Director, Registration 
Division (7505T), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-
0001; main telephone number: (202) 566-1030; email address: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83d1c7c5d1cdecf7eae0e6f0c3e6f3e2ade4ecf5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="02504644504c6d766b616771426772632c656d74">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Executive Summary

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an 
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. 
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System 
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a 
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them:
    <bullet> Crop production (NAICS code 111).
    <bullet> Animal production (NAICS code 112).
    <bullet> Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
    <bullet> Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
    If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this 
action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. What is EPA's authority for taking this action?

    In accordance with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) 
sections 408(e) and 408(l)(6) of, 21 U.S.C. 346a(e) and 346a(1)(6), EPA 
is establishing a time-limited tolerance for residues of 
chlorantraniliprole, including its metabolites and degradates, in or on 
rice, grain at 15 parts per million (ppm). This time-limited tolerance 
expires on December 31, 2028.

C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?

    Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file 
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a 
hearing on those objections. If you fail to file an objection to the 
final rule within the time period specified in the final rule, you will 
have waived the right to raise any issues resolved in the final rule. 
You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in 
accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure 
proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2025-0284 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All 
objections and requests for a hearing must be in writing and must be 
received by the Hearing Clerk on or before January 16, 2026. Addresses 
for mail and hand delivery of objections and hearing requests are 
provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the 
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of 
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for 
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential 
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without 
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing 
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2025-0284, by one of 
the following methods:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. 
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit 
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
    <bullet> Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket 
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 
20460-0001.
    <bullet> Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand 
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the 
instructions at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets/where-send-comments-epa-dockets">https://www.epa.gov/dockets/where-send-comments-epa-dockets</a>.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along 
with more information about dockets generally, is available at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets">https://www.epa.gov/dockets</a>.

II. Background and Statutory Findings

    Section 408(l)(6) of FFDCA requires EPA to establish a time-limited 
tolerance or exemption from the requirement for a tolerance for 
pesticide chemical residues in food that will result from the use of a 
pesticide under an emergency exemption granted by EPA under FIFRA 
section 18. Such tolerances can be established without providing notice 
or period for public comment. EPA does not intend for its actions on 
FIFRA section 18 related time-limited tolerances to set binding 
precedents for the application of FFDCA section 408 and the safety 
standard to other tolerances and exemptions. Section 408(e) of FFDCA 
allows EPA to establish a tolerance or an exemption from the 
requirement of a tolerance on its own initiative, i.e., without having 
received any petition from an outside party.
    FFDCA Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a 
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a 
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a 
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure 
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary 
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable 
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in 
residential settings but does not include occupational exposure. 
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special 
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide 
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there 
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and 
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . . 
.''
    Section 18 of FIFRA authorizes EPA to exempt any Federal or State 
agency from any provision of FIFRA, if EPA determines that ``emergency 
conditions exist which require such exemption.'' EPA has established 
regulations governing such emergency exemptions in 40 CFR part 166.

III. Emergency Exemption for Chlorantraniliprole on Rice and FFDCA 
Tolerance

    The Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry (LDAF) has 
requested a specific emergency exemption for the use of foliar-applied 
chlorantraniliprole to control stem borer in rice. The applicant 
asserts that stem borer is a major pest in Louisiana rice, and that 
stem borer larvae feed internally in rice stems, causing severe 
economic damage. According to LDAF, there is a lack of adequate 
alternative controls that can be used in production systems where rice 
is rotated with crawfish. Without an effective control, Louisiana rice 
growers affected by uncontrolled stem borer face significant economic 
yield losses.
    After having reviewed the submission, EPA determined that an 
emergency condition exists for this State, and that the criteria for 
approval of an emergency exemption are met. EPA has authorized a 
specific exemption under FIFRA section 18 for

[[Page 51120]]

the use of chlorantraniliprole on rice for control of stem borer in 
Louisiana.
    As part of its evaluation of the emergency exemption application, 
EPA assessed the potential risks presented by residues of 
chlorantraniliprole in or on rice, grain. In doing so, EPA considered 
the safety standard in FFDCA section 408(b)(2), and EPA decided that 
the necessary tolerance under FFDCA section 408(l)(6) would be 
consistent with the safety standard and with FIFRA section 18. 
Consistent with the need to move quickly on the emergency exemption in 
order to address an urgent non-routine situation and to ensure that the 
resulting food is safe and lawful, EPA is issuing this tolerance 
without notice and opportunity for public comment as provided in FFDCA 
section 408(l)(6). Although this time-limited tolerance expires on 
December 31, 2028, under FFDCA section 408(l)(5), residues of the 
pesticide not in excess of the amount specified in the tolerance 
remaining in or on rice, grain after that date will not be unlawful, 
provided the pesticide was applied in a manner that was lawful under 
FIFRA, and the residues do not exceed a level that was authorized by 
this time-limited tolerance at the time of that application. EPA will 
take action to revoke the time-limited tolerance earlier if any 
experience with, scientific data on, or other relevant information on 
this pesticide indicate that the residues are not safe.
    Because this time-limited tolerance is being approved under 
emergency conditions, EPA has not made any decisions about whether 
chlorantraniliprole meets FIFRA's registration requirements for use on 
rice or whether a permanent tolerance for this use would be 
appropriate. Under these circumstances, EPA does not believe that this 
time-limited tolerance decision serves as a basis for registration of 
chlorantraniliprole by a State for special local needs under FIFRA 
section 24(c). Nor does this tolerance by itself serve as the authority 
for persons in any State other than Louisiana to use this pesticide on 
rice FIFRA section 18 absent the issuance of an emergency exemption 
applicable within that State. For additional information regarding the 
emergency exemption for chlorantraniliprole, contact the Agency's 
Registration Division at the address provided under FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT.

IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety

    Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a 
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a 
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a 
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure 
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary 
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable 
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in 
residential settings but does not include occupational exposure. 
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special 
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide 
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there 
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and 
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . . 
.''
    Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors 
specified therein, EPA has reviewed the available scientific data and 
other relevant information in support of this action. EPA has 
sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a determination on 
aggregate exposure expected as a result of the use proposed by this 
emergency exemption request and the time-limited tolerance for residues 
of chlorantraniliprole on rice, grain at 15 ppm. EPA's assessment of 
exposures and risks associated with establishing the time-limited 
tolerance follows.

A. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern

    Once a pesticide's toxicological profile is determined, EPA 
identifies toxicological points of departure (POD) and levels of 
concern to use in evaluating the risk posed by human exposure to the 
pesticide. For hazards that have a threshold below which there is no 
appreciable risk, the toxicological POD is used as the basis for 
derivation of reference values for risk assessment. PODs are developed 
based on a careful analysis of the doses in each toxicological study to 
determine the dose at which no adverse effects are observed (the NOAEL) 
and the lowest dose at which adverse effects of concern are identified 
(the LOAEL). Uncertainty/safety factors are used in conjunction with 
the POD to calculate a safe exposure level--generally referred to as a 
population-adjusted dose (PAD) or a reference dose (RfD)--and a safe 
margin of exposure (MOE). For non-threshold risks, the Agency assumes 
that any amount of exposure will lead to some degree of risk. Thus, the 
Agency estimates risk in terms of the probability of an occurrence of 
the adverse effect expected in a lifetime. For more information on the 
general principles EPA uses in risk characterization and a complete 
description of the risk assessment process, see <a href="https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/assessing-human-health-risk-pesticides">https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/assessing-human-health-risk-pesticides</a>.
    A summary of the toxicological endpoints for chlorantraniliprole, 
and its metabolite and degradates, used for human risk assessment, is 
discussed in Unit III of the final rule published in the Federal 
Register of February 7, 2014 (79 FR 7397) (FRL-9905-56).

B. Exposure Assessment

    1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. An acute dietary 
toxicity endpoint could not be identified based on the toxicology data 
currently available for chlorantraniliprole; therefore, an acute 
assessment was not conducted. To assess dietary exposure resulting from 
the proposed Section 18 use, EPA performed a chronic dietary analysis 
for chlorantraniliprole. In evaluating dietary exposure to 
chlorantraniliprole, EPA considered exposure under the time-limited 
tolerance established by this action as well as all existing 
chlorantraniliprole tolerances in 40 CFR 180.628. EPA assessed dietary 
exposures from chlorantraniliprole in food as follows:
    i. Acute exposure. An acute dietary toxicity endpoint was not 
identified based on the toxicology data currently available for 
chlorantraniliprole; therefore, an acute assessment was not performed.
    ii. Chronic exposure. In conducting the chronic (food and drinking 
water) dietary risk assessment for chlorantraniliprole, a dietary 
analysis was performed using tolerance-level residues and 100% crop 
treated (PCT) conservative assumptions. Default processing factors were 
also used.
    iii. Cancer. EPA has classified chlorantraniliprole as ``Not Likely 
to be Carcinogenic to Humans'' based on weight of evidence of data. 
Therefore, a cancer assessment was not performed.
    iv. Anticipated residue and percent crop treated (PCT) information. 
EPA did not use anticipated residues. However, tolerance level residues 
and 100% PCT were assumed for all food commodities in the dietary 
assessment for chlorantraniliprole.
    v. Dietary exposure from drinking water. The Agency used screening 
level water exposure models: the Pesticide Root Zone Model (PRZM)-
Exposure Analysis Modeling system EXAMS) and PRZM-Ground Water (GW) in 
the dietary exposure analysis and risk assessment for 
chlorantraniliprole. These simulation models take into

[[Page 51121]]

account data on the physical, chemical, and fate/transport 
characteristics of chlorantraniliprole. Further information regarding 
EPA drinking water models used in pesticide exposure assessment can be 
found at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/models-pesticide-risk-assessment#aquatic">https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/models-pesticide-risk-assessment#aquatic</a>.
    The highest modeled ground water EDWCs for chlorantraniliprole used 
in the dietary risk assessments were entered directly into the latest 
version of the Pesticides in Water Calculator (PWC 1.52). The highest 
surface water EDWCs for chlorantraniliprole used in the dietary risk 
assessments were generated using the Tier 1 Rice Model. EDWCs were 
calculated for groundwater and surface water based on the maximum 
annual application rate (0.132 lb ai/A/Yr). The estimated drinking 
water contribution to chronic dietary exposure risks from drinking 
water were 647 parts per billion (ppb) for groundwater and 97 ppb for 
surface water. No acute dietary risk assessment was performed because 
an acute hazard was not identified. These modeled estimates of drinking 
water concentrations were directly entered into the dietary exposure 
model.
    3. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is 
used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary 
exposure (e.g., for lawn and garden pest control, indoor pest control, 
termiticides, and flea and tick control on pets).
    Residential exposure to chlorantraniliprole is not expected based 
on the proposed use pattern on rice. However, chlorantraniliprole is 
currently registered for uses (i.e., residential or golf course turf, 
residential ornaments, and pre-and post-construction termiticide use), 
where residential handler and post-application exposures are 
anticipated. No dermal, inhalation or oral PODs have been identified 
for short-term exposures to chlorantraniliprole. Therefore, no short-
term risk assessment has been conducted for the residential uses.
    Further information regarding EPA standard assumptions and generic 
inputs for residential exposures may be found at: <a href="https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/standard-operating-procedures-residential-pesticide">https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/standard-operating-procedures-residential-pesticide</a>.
    4. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of 
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when 
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the 
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative 
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances 
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
    EPA has not found chlorantraniliprole to share a common mechanism 
of toxicity with any other substances. In addition, chlorantraniliprole 
does not appear to produce a toxic metabolite produced by other 
substances. For the purposes of this tolerance action, therefore, EPA 
has not assumed that chlorantraniliprole has a common mechanism of 
toxicity with other substances and concluded that it is not appropriate 
to conduct a cumulative exposure assessment. For information regarding 
EPA's efforts to determine which chemicals have a common mechanism of 
toxicity and to evaluate the cumulative effects of such chemicals, see 
EPA's website at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/cumulative-assessment-risk-pesticides">https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/cumulative-assessment-risk-pesticides</a>.

C. Safety Factor for Infants and Children

    1. In general. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA provides that EPA 
shall apply an additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety for infants 
and children in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal 
and postnatal toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity 
and exposure unless EPA determines based on reliable data that a 
different margin of safety will be safe for infants and children. This 
additional margin of safety is commonly referred to as the FQPA Safety 
Factor (SF). In applying this provision, EPA either retains the default 
value of 10X, or uses a different additional SF when reliable data 
available to EPA support the choice of a different factor.
    2. Conclusion for chlorantraniliprole. EPA has determined that 
reliable data show that the safety of infants and children would be 
adequately protected if the FQPA SF were reduced to 1X for all 
population subgroups and chlorantraniliprole exposure scenarios. That 
decision is based on the following findings:
    i. The toxicity database for chlorantraniliprole is (1) considered 
complete for evaluating and selecting toxicity endpoints and PODs, (2) 
dietary and residential exposure analyses are unlikely to underestimate 
exposure, and (3) there is no evidence of susceptibility or 
neurotoxicity in the database.
    ii. No endpoints have been selected for acute oral, incidental 
oral, dermal, or inhalation routes of exposure; therefore, quantitative 
acute dietary, residential, and occupational human health assessments 
were not performed. However, an endpoint has been selected for chronic 
oral exposures and was quantitatively assessed. In general 
chlorantraniliprole is non-toxic, as effects are non-adverse up to the 
limit dose in most studies (1,000 mg/kg/day for most studies, 2,000 mg/
kg/day for acute neurotoxicity). Chlorantraniliprole is not considered 
developmentally toxic, genotoxic, neurotoxic, immunotoxic, or 
carcinogenic.
    iii. In an 18-month oral (feeding) carcinogenicity study in mice, 
there is evidence of chronic dietary adverse effects following 
chlorantraniliprole exposure near the LOAEL limit dose of 935 mg/kg/day 
based on eosinophilic foci accompanied by hepatocellular hypertrophy 
and increased live weight in males only.
    iv. There are no residual uncertainties identified in the exposure 
databases. Results of the chronic dietary analysis indicate that food 
and drinking water exposure are not of concern. This assessment was 
performed based on high-end assumptions such as 100% CT and tolerance-
level residues, default processing factors, and modeled high-end 
estimates of residues in drinking water, and is not expected to 
underestimate the exposure and risks posed by chlorantraniliprole. In 
addition, residential exposure to chlorantraniliprole is not expected 
based on the proposed use pattern on rice. Based upon the existing 
registered uses, residential exposures may occur during and following 
the application of products containing chlorantraniliprole. Also, non-
occupational bystander spray drift exposures are possible. In an 
occupational setting, applicators may be exposed while handling the 
pesticide prior to and during application. There is potential for post-
application exposure for workers re-entering treated areas. In the 
absence of any observed hazard from relevant exposures to 
chlorantraniliprole, occupational handler and post-application exposure 
assessments have not been performed.

D. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety

    EPA determines whether acute and chronic dietary pesticide 
exposures are safe by comparing aggregate exposure estimates to the 
acute PAD (aPAD) and chronic PAD (cPAD). For linear cancer risks, EPA 
calculates the lifetime probability of acquiring cancer given the 
estimated aggregate exposure. Short-, intermediate-, and chronic-term 
risks are evaluated by comparing the estimated aggregate food, water, 
and residential exposure to the appropriate PODs to ensure that an 
adequate MOE exists.
    1. Acute risk. The acute aggregate risk assessment takes into 
account acute exposure estimates from dietary

[[Page 51122]]

consumption of food and drinking water. An acute endpoint for 
chlorantraniliprole was not identified based on the toxicology data 
currently available for chlorantraniliprole; therefore, an acute 
assessment was not performed.
    2. Chronic risk. Chronic exposures are not expected for adults or 
children via residential exposure pathways from either the proposed use 
or existing registrations of chlorantraniliprole. Therefore, the 
chronic aggregate risk is equivalent to the chronic dietary risk 
estimates. The estimated chronic dietary exposure risks from food and 
water for chlorantraniliprole are below the LOC (<100% of the cPAD) for 
the US general population and all population subgroups. For 
chlorantraniliprole, EPA has concluded that chronic exposure from food 
and water will utilize 9.3% of the cPAD for Children 1-2 years old, the 
population group receiving the greatest exposure. For the overall U.S. 
population, chronic exposure from food and water will utilize 3.6% of 
the cPAD.
    3. Short-term risk. Short-term aggregate exposure takes into 
account short-term residential exposure plus chronic exposure to food 
and water. Residential exposures are not expected for the proposed use; 
however, residential handler and post-application exposures are 
anticipated based on the registered use pattern of chlorantraniliprole. 
At this time, an endpoint has only been selected for chronic oral 
exposures; therefore, short-term aggregate risk is equivalent to the 
chronic dietary exposures only and is not of concern. 
Chlorantraniliprole is not expected to pose a short-term risk because 
no short-term adverse effects were identified.
    4. Intermediate-term risk. Intermediate-term aggregate exposure 
takes into account intermediate-term residential exposure plus chronic 
exposure to food and water (considered to be a background exposure 
level). At this time, an endpoint has only been selected for chronic 
oral exposures; therefore, intermediate-term aggregate risk is 
equivalent to the chronic dietary exposures only and is not of concern. 
Chlorantraniliprole is not expected to pose an intermediate-term risk 
because no intermediate-term adverse effects were identified.
    5. Aggregate cancer risk for U.S. population. Chlorantraniliprole 
is classified as ``Not Likely to Be Carcinogenic to Humans,'' 
therefore, a cancer aggregate assessment was not performed.
    6. Determination of safety. Based on these risk assessments, EPA 
concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result 
to the general population, or to infants and children, from aggregate 
exposure to chlorantraniliprole residues.

V. Other Considerations

A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

    An adequate enforcement methodology is available for plants and 
livestock using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometer/mass 
spectrometer (LC/MS/MS) for analysis of chlorantraniliprole residues. 
The limit of quantitation (LOQ) is reported at 0.01 ppm for parent 
chlorantraniliprole. The LC/MS/MS method was adequately validated on a 
variety of matrices, and an acceptable Independent Laboratory 
Validation (ILV) study was submitted. The method for the determination 
of chlorantraniliprole in processed commodities is a LC/MS/MS method, 
DuPont-14314, which is a slightly modified version of DuPont-11374. The 
LOQ is reported at 0.010 ppm for chlorantraniliprole. The requirements 
for multiresidue methods data are fulfilled. Chlorantraniliprole is not 
recovered by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) 
multiresidue methods.

B. International Residue Limits

    In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S. 
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent 
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA 
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established 
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA 
section 408(b)(4). The Codex Alimentarius is a joint United Nations 
Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization food 
standards program, and it is recognized as an international food safety 
standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the United 
States is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from 
a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain 
the reasons for departing from the Codex level.
    The Codex and Canada have established maximum residue limits (MRLs) 
for residues of chlorantraniliprole in/on rice. The recommended U.S. 
tolerance for the time-limited tolerance established by this action of 
15 ppm chlorantraniliprole rice, grain is not harmonized with the 
Canadian MRL (0.15 ppm) nor the Codex MRL (0.4 ppm) for rice, grain 
because of considerable differences in the use pattern, and EPA's 
regulations require adequate time-limited tolerances be in place in 
order to allow a pesticide use on food under an emergency exemption. 
Since EPA has determined that this time-limited tolerance is safe, EPA 
is establishing this time-limited tolerance despite the lack of 
harmonization with the related Codex MRL.

C. Effective and Expiration Date(s)

    In general, a tolerance action is effective on the date of 
publication of the final rule in the Federal Register. For actions in 
the final rule that lower or revoke existing tolerances, EPA will set 
an expiration date for the existing tolerance of six months after the 
date of publication of the final rule in the Federal Register, in order 
to allow a reasonable interval for producers in exporting members of 
the World Trade Organization's (WTO's) Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) 
Measures Agreement to adapt to the requirements.

VI. Conclusion

    Therefore, a time-limited tolerance is established for residues of 
chlorantraniliprole (CAS No. 50000-45-7) in or on food and feed 
commodity, rice, grain, at 15 ppm. This tolerance expires on December 
31, 2028.

VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders 
can be found at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/regulations/laws-and-executive-orders">https://www.epa.gov/regulations/laws-and-executive-orders</a>.

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review

    This action is exempt from review under Executive Order 12866 (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993), because it establishes a time-limited 
tolerance or an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for 
pesticide chemical residues in food that will result from the use of a 
pesticide under an emergency exemption granted by EPA under FIFRA 
section 18. The Office of Management and Budget has exempted these 
types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866.

B. Executive Order 14192: Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation

    Executive Order 14192 (90 FR 9065, February 6, 2025) does not apply 
because actions that establish a tolerance under FFDCA section 408 are 
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866.

[[Page 51123]]

C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    This action does not contain any information collections subject to 
OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et 
seq.

D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    Since tolerances and exemptions that are established in accordance 
with FFDCA sections 408(e) and 408(1)(6), such as the tolerance in this 
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the 
requirements of the RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., do not apply to this 
action.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain an unfunded mandate of $100 million or 
more (in 1995 dollars and adjusted annually for inflation) as described 
in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538 and does not significantly or uniquely 
affect small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any 
State, local, or Tribal governments or on the private sector.

F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it will 
not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship 
between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments

    This action does not have Tribal implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000) because it will 
not have substantial direct effects on Tribal governments, on the 
relationship between the Federal Government and the Indian Tribes, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
Government and Indian Tribes.

H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental 
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, 
April 23, 1997) because tolerance actions like this one are exempt from 
review under Executive Order 12866.

I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355) 
(May 22, 2001) because it is not a significant regulatory action under 
Executive Order 12866.

J. National Technology Transfer Advancement Act (NTTAA)

    This action does not involve technical standards that would require 
Agency consideration under NTTAA section 12(d), 15 U.S.C. 272.

K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)

    This action is subject to the CRA, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., and EPA 
will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the 
Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a ``major 
rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

VIII. Congressional Review Act (CRA)

    This action is subject to the CRA, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., and EPA 
will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not 
a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: November 3, 2025.
Charles Smith,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR 
chapter I as follows:

PART 180--TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES 
IN FOOD

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.


0
2. In Sec.  180.628, add paragraph (b) and Table 2 to read as follows:


Sec.  180.628   Chlorantraniliprole; tolerances for residues.

* * * * *
    (b) Section 18 emergency exemptions. A time-limited tolerance is 
established for residues of chlorantraniliprole, including its 
metabolites and degradates, in or on the specified agricultural 
commodity in the table below. Compliance with the tolerance level 
specified in the following table is to be determined by measuring only 
chlorantraniliprole, 3-bromo-N-[4-chloro-2-methyl-6[(methylamino) 
carbonyl]phenyl]-1-(3-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide, in 
or on the specified agricultural commodity, resulting from use of the 
pesticide pursuant to FIFRA section 18 emergency exemption. The 
tolerance expires on the date specified in the table.

                        Table 2 to Paragraph (b)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                Parts per    Expiration
                  Commodity                      million        date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rice, grain..................................          15    12/31/2028
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2025-19910 Filed 11-14-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on November 17, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.