Notice2025-19421

Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand From Malaysia: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
October 3, 2025

Issuing agencies

Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on prestressed concrete steel wire strand (PC strand) from Malaysia for the period of review (POR) June 1, 2023, through May 31, 2024. Commerce preliminarily finds that Kiswire Sdn. Bhd. (Kiswire) and Wei Dat Steel Wire Sdn. Bhd. (Wei Dat) did not make sales of subject merchandise at prices below normal value (NV) during the POR. Additionally, we are rescinding this review, in part, with respect to one company for which there were no reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 190 (Friday, October 3, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 190 (Friday, October 3, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48037-48040]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-19421]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-557-819]


Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand From Malaysia: Preliminary 
Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2023-2024

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is conducting an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on prestressed 
concrete steel wire strand (PC strand) from Malaysia for the period of 
review (POR) June 1, 2023, through May 31, 2024. Commerce preliminarily 
finds that Kiswire Sdn. Bhd. (Kiswire) and Wei Dat Steel Wire Sdn. Bhd. 
(Wei Dat) did not make sales of subject merchandise at prices below 
normal value (NV) during the POR. Additionally, we are rescinding this 
review, in part, with respect to one company for which there were no 
reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR. We invite 
interested parties to comment on these preliminary results.

DATES: Applicable October 3, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Monica Gillis or Peter Shaw, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6384 or (202) 482-0697, 
respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On July 29, 2024, Commerce initiated an administrative review of 
the AD order on PC strand, in accordance with

[[Page 48038]]

section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).\1\ This 
review covers four producers/exporters of subject merchandise.\2\ 
Commerce selected two mandatory respondents for individual examination, 
Kiswire and Wei Dat.\3\ On December 9, 2024, Commerce tolled certain 
deadlines in this administrative proceeding by 90 days \4\ and, on May 
8, 2025, Commerce extended the time limit for completing the 
preliminary results of this review until September 26, 2025.\5\ For a 
complete description of the events that followed the initiation of the 
review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 89 FR 60871 (July 29, 2024) (Initiation 
Notice); see also Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from 
Indonesia, Italy, Malaysia, South Africa, Spain, Tunisia, and 
Ukraine: Antidumping Duty Orders, 86 FR 29998 (June 4, 2021) 
(Order).
    \2\ See Initiation Notice.
    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Respondent Selection,'' dated August 13, 
2024.
    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings,'' dated December 9, 2024.
    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated May 8, 
2025.
    \6\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary 
Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order 
on Prestressed Concrete Wire Strand from Malaysia; 2023-2024,'' 
dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice 
(Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For a full description of the methodology underlying these 
preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A list of 
the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included 
as an appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 
public document and is made available to the public via Enforcement and 
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic 
Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
<a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, a complete version of the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.

Scope of the Order

    The product covered by the scope of the Order is PC strand from 
Malaysia. For a full description of the scope of the Order, see the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.

Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), when there are no reviewable 
entries of subject merchandise during the POR subject to the AD order 
for which liquidation is suspended, Commerce may rescind an 
administrative review, in whole or only with respect to a particular 
exporter or producer.\7\ At the end of the administrative review, any 
suspended entries are liquidated at the assessment rate computed for 
the review period.\8\ Therefore, for an administrative review to be 
conducted, there must be at least one reviewable, suspended entry that 
Commerce can instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 
liquidate at the newly calculated assessment rate. On August 14, 2024, 
Commerce notified all interested parties of its intent to rescind the 
administrative review with respect to Southern Steel Sdn. Bhd. 
(Southern Steel) because this company had no reviewable, suspended 
entries of subject merchandise and invited interested parties to 
comment.\9\ We received no comments on our intent to rescind the review 
with respect to Southern Steel. Accordingly, pursuant to 19 CFR 
351.213(d)(3), we are rescinding this administrative review, in part, 
with respect to Southern Steel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See, e.g., Forged Steel Fittings from Taiwan: Rescission of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019, 85 FR 71317, 
71318 (November 9, 2020); see also Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy 
Steel Pipe from Mexico: Rescission of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2016-2017, 83 FR 54084 (October 26, 2018).
    \8\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
    \9\ See Memorandum, ``Notice of Intent to Rescind Review, In 
Part,'' dated August 14, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 
751(a) of the Act. We calculated export price and NV in accordance with 
sections 772(a) and 773 of the Act, respectively.

Rate for Non-Examined Company

    The Act and Commerce's regulations do not address the establishment 
of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for examination when 
Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to 
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 
735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the 
all-others rate in a market economy investigation, for guidance when 
calculating the rate for companies which were not selected for 
individual examination in an administrative review. Under section 
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally ``an amount 
equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping 
margins established for exporters and producers individually 
investigated, excluding any zero and de minimis margins, and any 
margins determined entirely'' on the basis of facts available. Where 
the dumping margin for individually examined respondents are all zero, 
de minimis, or based entirely on facts available, section 735(c)(5)(B) 
of the Act provides that Commerce may use ``any reasonable method to 
establish the estimated all-others rate for exporters and producers not 
individually investigated, including averaging the estimated weighted 
average dumping margins determined for the exporters and producers 
individually investigated.''
    In this review, Commerce preliminarily calculated weighted-average 
dumping margins for both Kiswire and Wei Dat that are zero percent. 
Therefore, consistent with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal 
Circuit's decision in Albemarle,\10\ and Commerce's practice,\11\ we 
assigned the sole non-examined company, Southern PC Steel Sdn. Bhd., a 
rate of zero percent, because we calculated rates of zero percent for 
both mandatory respondents, pursuant to section 735(c)(5)(B) of the 
Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Albemarle Corp. v. United States, 821 F.3d 1345 (Fed. 
Cir. 2016) (Albemarle).
    \11\ See, e.g., Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the 
Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2020-2021, 87 FR 60989 (October 7, 2022), 
unchanged in Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the 
Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2020-2021, 88 FR 20218 (April 5, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Results of the Review

    Commerce preliminarily determines that the following estimated 
weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period June 1, 2023, 
through May 31, 2024:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Weighted-
                                                               average
                     Exporter/producer                         dumping
                                                                margin
                                                              (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kiswire Sdn. Bhd...........................................        0.00
Wei Dat Steel Wire Sdn. Bhd................................        0.00
Southern PC Steel Sdn. Bhd.................................        0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    Commerce intends to disclose the calculations performed in 
connection with these preliminary results to interested parties within 
five days of any public announcement or, if there is no public 
announcement, within five days of the date of publication of this 
notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Verification

    On August 21, 2024, Insteel Wire Products Company, Sumiden Wire

[[Page 48039]]

Products Corporation, and Wire Mesh Corp. (collectively, the 
petitioners), requested that Commerce conduct verification of the 
questionnaire responses submitted in this administrative review for Wei 
Dat.\12\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.307(b)(1)(v), Commerce intends to 
verify the information submitted by Wei Dat prior to issuing the final 
results of this review. Additionally, pursuant to 19 CFR 
351.307(b)(1)(iv), Commerce intends to verify the questionnaire 
responses submitted by Kiswire, because we find that good cause for 
verification exists.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Petitioners' Letter, ``Petitioners' Request for 
Verification of Wei Dat Sdn. Bhd.,'' dated August 21, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Public Comment

    Case briefs or other written comments may be submitted to the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.\13\ Pursuant to 19 
CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), interested parties may submit case briefs no 
later than seven days after the date on which the last verification 
report is issued in this administrative review. Rebuttal briefs, 
limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later 
than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\14\ Interested 
parties who submit case or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding must 
submit: (1) a table of contents listing each issue; and (2) a table of 
authorities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii); see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for 
general filing requirements).
    \14\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative Protective 
Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 
2023) (APO and Service Final Rule).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As provided under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior 
proceedings we have encouraged interested parties to provide an 
executive summary of their brief that should be limited to five pages 
total, including footnotes. In this review, we instead request that 
interested parties provide at the beginning of their briefs a public, 
executive summary for each issue raised in their briefs.\15\ Further, 
we request that interested parties limit their executive summary of 
each issue to no more than 450 words, not including citations. We 
intend to use the executive summaries as the basis of the comment 
summaries included in the issues and decision memorandum that will 
accompany the final results in this review. We request that interested 
parties include footnotes for relevant citations in the executive 
summary of each issue. Note that Commerce has amended certain of its 
requirements pertaining to the service of documents in 19 CFR 
351.303(f).\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ We use the term ``issue'' here to describe an argument that 
Commerce would normally address in a comment of the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.
    \16\ See APO and Service Final Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant 
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, 
within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests 
should contain: (1) the party's name, address, and telephone number; 
(2) the number of participants and whether any participant is a foreign 
national; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in 
the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case 
briefs. Oral presentations at the hearing will be limited to issues 
raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will 
be notified of the time and date for the hearing.\17\ Parties should 
confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two 
days before the scheduled date. All submissions, including case and 
rebuttal briefs, as well as hearing requests, should be filed via 
ACCESS.\18\ An electronically filed document must be received 
successfully in its entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the 
established deadline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
    \18\ See 19 CFR 351.303.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    Upon completion of the final results of this administrative review, 
Commerce shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on 
all appropriate entries covered by this review. If a respondent's 
weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less 
than 0.5 percent) in the final results of this review, we will 
calculate importer-specific assessment rates based on the ratio of the 
total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to 
the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1). If either respondent's weighted-average dumping margin 
is zero or de minimis in the final results of review, or if an 
importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, Commerce will 
instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to 
antidumping duties. The final results of this review shall be the basis 
for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise 
covered by this review and for future deposits of estimated duties, 
where applicable.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' practice, 
for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Kiswire 
or Wei Dat for which these companies did not know that the merchandise 
was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate 
those entries at the all-others rate established in the original less-
than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation (i.e., 5.13 percent),\20\ if there 
is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the 
transaction.\21\ For the company that was not selected for individual 
review, we will assign an assessment rate based on the review-specific 
average rate, calculated as noted in the ``Preliminary Results of 
Review'' section above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See Order, 86 FR at 30000.
    \21\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the company for which the review is rescinded, Southern Steel, 
we will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on any suspended 
entries that entered under its CBP case number (i.e., at that 
exporter's rate) at a rate equal to the cash deposit of estimated 
antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from 
warehouse, for consumption, during the POR.
    Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier 
than 35 days after the publication date of the final results of this 
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the 
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will 
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties 
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 
90 days of publication).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for the companies 
listed in the final results of this review will be equal to the 
weighted-average dumping margins established in the final results of 
this review, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, 
therefore, de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in 
which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for merchandise 
exported by a company not covered in this review, but covered in a 
prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will be the 
company-

[[Page 48040]]

specific rate published for the most recently-completed segment in 
which it was reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in 
this review or in the original LTFV investigation, but the producer is, 
then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most 
recently-completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the 
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or 
exporters will continue to be 5.13 percent, the all-others rate 
established in the LTFV investigation.\22\ These cash deposit 
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further 
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See Order, 81 FR at 30000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Review

    Unless otherwise extended, Commerce intends to issue the final 
results of this administrative review, including the results of its 
analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, no later than 120 
days after the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1).

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to the 
liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notification to Interested Parties

    Commerce is issuing and publishing these results in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2) 
and 351.221(b)(4).

     Dated: September 26, 2025.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Particular Market Situation
V. Discussion of the Methodology
VI. Currency Conversion
VII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2025-19421 Filed 10-2-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on October 3, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.