Proposed Rule2025-19278

Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Muskingum River 2010 Sulfur Dioxide Redesignation and Maintenance Plan

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
October 2, 2025

Issuing agencies

Environmental Protection Agency

Abstract

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to redesignate the Muskingum River sulfur dioxide (SO<INF>2</INF>) nonattainment area, located in Center Township in Morgan County and Waterford Township in Washington County, Ohio, to attainment for the 2010 SO<INF>2</INF> National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). EPA is also proposing to approve Ohio's maintenance plan for the area and Ohio's Director's Final Findings and Orders (DFFOs), issued March 26, 2025. Ohio submitted the request for approval on March 31, 2025.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 189 (Thursday, October 2, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 189 (Thursday, October 2, 2025)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 47686-47693]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-19278]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81

[EPA-R05-OAR-2025-0165; FRL-12974-01-R5]


Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Muskingum River 2010 Sulfur Dioxide 
Redesignation and Maintenance Plan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
redesignate the Muskingum River sulfur dioxide (SO<INF>2</INF>) 
nonattainment area, located in Center Township in Morgan County and 
Waterford Township in Washington County, Ohio, to attainment for the 
2010 SO<INF>2</INF> National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). EPA 
is also proposing to approve Ohio's maintenance plan for the area and 
Ohio's Director's Final Findings and Orders (DFFOs), issued March 26, 
2025. Ohio submitted the request for approval on March 31, 2025.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 3, 2025.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2025-0165 at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>, or via email to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7d1c0f0f1c530e1c0f1c153d180d1c531a120b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="45243737246b362437242d052035246b222a33">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. For comments submitted at <a href="http://Regulations.gov">Regulations.gov</a>, follow 
the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, 
comments cannot be edited or removed from the docket. EPA may publish 
any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically 
any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information 
(CBI), Proprietary Business Information (PBI), or other information 
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions 
(audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The 
written comment is considered the official comment and should include 
discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not 
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary 
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For 
additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public 
comment policy, information about CBI, PBI, or multimedia submissions, 
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets">https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets</a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gina Harrison, Air and Radiation 
Division (AR18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West 
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353-6956, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7c141d0e0e150f1312521b15121d3c190c1d521b130a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="513930232338223e3f7f36383f30113421307f363e27">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. The EPA Region 5 office is open from 8:30 a.m. 
to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays and 
facility closures.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. What is EPA proposing?

    EPA is proposing to determine that the Muskingum River 
SO<INF>2</INF> nonattainment area, located in Center Township in Morgan 
County and Waterford Township in Washington County, Ohio, is attaining 
the 2010 SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS, based on quality-assured and certified 
monitoring data for the period 2015-2024, in accordance with Ohio's 
March 31, 2025, request. EPA has determined that the area is attaining 
the 2010 SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS and that the improvement in air quality 
is due to permanent and enforceable SO<INF>2</INF> emission reductions 
in the area. Therefore, EPA is proposing to change the legal 
designation of the Muskingum River SO<INF>2</INF> nonattainment area to 
attainment for the 2010 SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS. EPA is also proposing to 
approve Ohio's maintenance plan into the Ohio State Implementation Plan 
(SIP), which is designed to ensure that the area will continue to meet 
the SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS. Finally, EPA is proposing to approve the 
site-specific DFFOs which were issued on March 26, 2025, into the SIP. 
Ohio's submittal, which includes the maintenance plan and DFFOs, will 
be available for public review as part of the rulemaking docket for 
this action.

II. What is the background for these actions?

    On June 22, 2010 (75 FR 35520), EPA revised the primary 
SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS, establishing a new 1-hour standard of 75 parts 
per billion (ppb), which is met at an ambient air quality monitoring 
site when the 3-year average of the annual 99th percentile of daily 
maximum 1-hour average concentrations is less than or equal to 75 ppb, 
as determined in accordance with appendix T of 40 CFR part 50. 40 CFR 
50.17(a)-(b). EPA promulgated designations for this standard in four 
rounds.
    On June 3, 2011, Ohio submitted its recommendations to EPA to 
designate certain areas of the State as attaining, not attaining, or 
unclassifiable for attaining the SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS. Ohio recommended 
that the area located in southeastern Ohio that includes Center 
Township in Morgan County and Waterford Township in Washington County 
be designated as nonattainment for the 2010 SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS. EPA 
concurred with Ohio's analysis and, on August 15, 2013, published a 
final action designating the area as nonattainment of the 2010 
SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS, effective October 4, 2013 (78 FR 47191).
    Under section 192(a) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), States are also 
required to submit attainment plans to demonstrate that the respective 
areas will attain the NAAQS as expeditiously as practicable, but no 
later than five years from the effective date of designation. Ohio 
submitted statewide nonattainment area SIPs to EPA on April 3, 2015, 
and October 13, 2015, and submitted supplemental attainment plans for 
the Muskingum River SO<INF>2</INF> nonattainment area on June 24, 2020, 
July 28, 2022, and May 23, 2023.
    Ohio's fully approved attainment plan included modeling for the 
Globe Metallurgical, Inc., facility (Globe) and the State's DFFOs, 
which set forth emission limits at Globe and monitoring and testing 
requirements to confirm the source modeling characterization (September 
8, 2023, 88 FR 61969). Ohio's modeled emissions for this area showed 
the DFFO-required emission limits for Globe, in conjunction with the 
SO<INF>2</INF> reductions from the permanent retirement of the 
Muskingum River Power Plant in 2015, provide for attainment of the 
SO<INF>2</INF> standard throughout the area. In addition, the DFFOs 
required the installation and operation of an ambient air monitor 
downwind of Globe for a period of three years.
    On March 31, 2025, Ohio submitted a redesignation request and 
maintenance plan to EPA for the Muskingum River SO<INF>2</INF> 
nonattainment area for the 2010 SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS. The submitted 
redesignation request and maintenance plan include complete quality-
assured ambient air quality monitoring data meeting the 2010 
SO<INF>2</INF> standard from 2015 to 2024. These NAAQS attainment 
monitoring demonstrations, in addition to decreases in emission levels 
attributable to the shutdown of the

[[Page 47687]]

Muskingum River Power Plant and the promulgation of emission limits and 
other measures set forth in Ohio's DFFOs to Globe, provide the 
framework for Ohio's request for redesignation to attainment for the 
Muskingum River SO<INF>2</INF> nonattainment area. In addition, Ohio is 
requesting that EPA approve the March 26, 2025, revised DFFOs that 
replace emission limits established in the 2020 DFFOs for Globe to 
provide for maintenance in the area. The 2020 DFFOs contain emission 
limits that are currently in Ohio's approved SIP. Ohio is also 
requesting that EPA approve the new emission limits from the March 26, 
2025, revised DFFOs into the SIP.
    Under section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA, EPA may not promulgate a 
redesignation of a nonattainment area (or portion thereof) unless:
    1. EPA has determined that the area has attained the NAAQS;
    2. EPA has fully approved the applicable implementation plan for 
the area under section 110(k) of the CAA;
    3. EPA has determined that improvement in air quality is due to 
permanent and enforceable reductions in emissions resulting from 
implementation of the applicable implementation plan and applicable 
Federal air pollution control regulations and other permanent and 
enforceable reductions;
    4. EPA has fully approved a maintenance plan for the area under 
section 175A of the CAA; and
    5. The State containing such area has met all requirements 
applicable to the area under section 110 of the CAA and part D.
    On April 16, 1992 (57 FR 13498), EPA provided guidance on 
redesignations in the ``General Preamble for the Implementation of 
Title I of the CAA Amendments of 1990'' and supplemented this guidance 
on April 28, 1992 (57 FR 18070). EPA has provided further guidance on 
processing redesignation requests in policy memoranda.

III. What is EPA's analysis of Ohio's redesignation request and 
maintenance plan?

    On October 2, 2023, Ohio submitted a request that EPA redesignate 
the Muskingum River SO<INF>2</INF> nonattainment area to attainment and 
a SIP revision containing a maintenance plan for the area. EPA's 
evaluation of Ohio's redesignation request and maintenance plan was 
based on consideration of the five redesignation criteria provided 
under CAA section 107(d)(3)(E).
    Criterion (1)--The Muskingum River SO<INF>2</INF> Nonattainment 
Area has Attained the 2010 SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS.
    In accordance with CAA section 107(d)(3)(E)(i), for redesignation 
of a nonattainment area to attainment, the CAA requires EPA to 
determine that the area has attained the applicable NAAQS. In 
accordance with 40 CFR 50.17 and appendix T of part 50, an area is 
attaining the 1-hour primary SO<INF>2</INF> standard at an ambient air 
quality monitoring site when the three-year average of the annual (99th 
percentile) of the daily maximum 1-hour average concentrations is less 
than or equal to 75 ppb. As stated in EPA's April 23, 2014 ``Guidance 
for 1-Hour SO<INF>2</INF> Nonattainment Area SIP Submissions'' (April 
2014 SO<INF>2</INF> Guidance), there are two components needed to 
support an attainment determination: (1) a review of representative air 
quality monitoring data located in the area of maximum concentration; 
and (2) a further analysis, where there are no monitors, using air 
quality dispersion modeling, which will generally be needed to estimate 
SO<INF>2</INF> concentrations throughout the nonattainment area to 
demonstrate that the entire area is attaining the applicable NAAQS, 
based on current actual emissions or the fully implemented control 
strategy.\1\ The April 2014 SO<INF>2</INF> Guidance further states that 
dispersion modeling should be conducted to estimate SO<INF>2</INF> 
concentrations throughout the nonattainment area using actual emissions 
and meteorological information for the most recent three calendar 
years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ EPA's ``Guidance for 1-Hour Sulfur Dioxide (SO<INF>2</INF>) 
Nonattainment Area State Implementation Plans (SIP) Submissions'' 
can be found at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/so2-pollution/guidance-1-hour-sulfur-dioxide-so2-nonattainment-area-state-implementation-plans-sip">https://www.epa.gov/so2-pollution/guidance-1-hour-sulfur-dioxide-so2-nonattainment-area-state-implementation-plans-sip</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    EPA has reviewed the available SO<INF>2</INF> monitoring data from 
Ohio's two monitoring sites in the Muskingum River SO<INF>2</INF> 
nonattainment area for the 2015-2024 period--the Hackney monitor (site 
39-115-004), and the Globe monitor (site 39-167-0011). On December 18, 
2023, Ohio EPA requested to discontinue the Hackney monitor (39-115-
0004) due to the consistently low SO<INF>2</INF> values following the 
permanent shutdown of the Muskingum River Power Plant in 2015. On 
January 1, 2021, Ohio began operating the Globe monitor near the Globe 
Metallurgical facility in an area of maximum concentration to monitor 
emissions from this facility. These data have been quality assured in 
accordance with 40 CFR 58.10, are recorded in the EPA Air Quality 
System (AQS), and were certified in advance of EPA's publication of 
this proposal. Data from both monitors demonstrate that the Muskingum 
River SO<INF>2</INF> nonattainment area is attaining the 2010 
SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS. Since 2011, the highest three-year average of the 
annual 99th percentile of 1-hour daily maximum concentrations was 42 
ppb for the Hackney monitor and 24 ppb for the Globe monitor. Data for 
all monitoring sites and three-year design values are summarized in 
Tables 1 and 2, respectively.

                Table 1--Annual 99th Percentile Monitoring Data for the Muskingum River Nonattainment Area (Site 39-115-004, Hackney, and Site 39-167-0011, Globe) for 2011-2024
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                             Year (ppb)
                  Site                             County          -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                      2011     2012     2013     2014     2015     2016     2017     2018     2019     2020     2021     2022     2023     2024
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hackney................................  Morgan...................      175      142      124      148       91       17       17     * 18       15       13     * 18       13       24      N/A
Globe..................................  Morgan...................  .......  .......  .......  .......  .......  .......  .......  .......  .......  .......     * 17       24       26       22
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Less than 75% data capture in at least one quarter.


[[Page 47688]]


                       Table 2--Three-Year Design Values for the Muskingum River Nonattainment Area (Site 39-115-004, Hackney, and Site 39-167-0011, Globe) for 2011-2024
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                          Year (ppb)
                Site                          County         -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              2011-2013  2012-2014  2013-2015  2014-2016  2015-2017  2016-2018  2017-2019  2018-2020  2019-2021  2020-2022  2021-2023  2022-2024
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hackney.............................  Morgan................       147        138        121         85         42       * 17       * 17       * 15         15         15         18        N/A
Globe...............................  Morgan................  .........  .........  .........  .........  .........  .........  .........  .........  .........  .........      * 22         24
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Less than 75% data capture in at least one quarter.

    The Muskingum River SO<INF>2</INF> nonattainment area's 3-year 
SO<INF>2</INF> design value at the Hackney monitor \2\ first began 
attaining in the 2015-2017 design period with a value of 42 ppb,\3\ 
which meets the 2010 SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS. In addition, the highest 3-
year design value at the Globe monitor is 24 ppb. Therefore, EPA 
proposes to determine that the Muskingum River SO<INF>2</INF> 
nonattainment area is attaining the 2010 SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ On December 8, 2023, Ohio requested to discontinue the 
Hackney monitor due to the shutdown of the Muskingum River Power 
Plant and the subsequent low levels of SO<INF>2</INF> measured at 
that monitor.
    \3\ The SO<INF>2</INF> design value for the Hackney monitor with 
the highest 3-year averaged concentration following the 2015 
shutdown of the Muskingum River Power Plant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    EPA also considered Ohio's air quality modeling analyses submitted 
in the State's attainment plan SIP revision. On June 23, 2020, Ohio 
submitted a supplement to the attainment demonstration and control 
strategy for the Muskingum River SO<INF>2</INF> nonattainment area, 
which included twenty-six sets of SO<INF>2</INF> emission limits for 
Globe along with air quality modeling. These emission limit sets were 
based on modeled values demonstrating attainment and maintenance of the 
standard. Ohio's air quality modeling submitted in its attainment 
demonstration used the emission limit sets and yielded design values 
below the 2010 SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS for the Muskingum River area. The 
April 2014 SO<INF>2</INF> Guidance provides an extensive discussion of 
EPA's view that appropriately set comparably stringent limits based on 
averaging times as long as 30 days can be found to provide for 
attainment of the 2010 SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS. The April 2014 
SO<INF>2</INF> Guidance also offers specific recommendations for 
determining an appropriate longer-term average limit.
    Based on the limits and other information submitted in the June 23, 
2020, supplement, Ohio EPA issued DFFOs that set forth the 26 sets of 
1-hour emission limits, monitoring requirements, and testing and 
compliance plans for the Globe facility. EPA approved the emission 
limits on January 18, 2022 (87 FR 2555), and on September 8, 2023 (88 
FR 61969), as a part of Ohio's attainment demonstration SIP. Ohio's 
plan applies 1-hour emission rate combination emission limits as a 24-
hour average to Globe's two baghouses. More detail on EPA's analysis of 
the attainment plan for the Muskingum River SO<INF>2</INF> 
nonattainment area can be found in the September 8, 2023 (88 FR 61969), 
attainment plan approval.
    The attainment plan required that Globe perform further source 
testing to verify the accuracy of the previously modeled parameters. 
Globe performed these additional tests in June 2024 and updated the 
attainment strategy modeling to revise two of the emission limit sets--
specifically, to revise one and remove one of the sets. These changes 
better align the limits with expected production scenarios. On March 
26, 2025, Ohio revised its DFFOs and issued new DFFOs reflecting these 
changes. The final emission limit sets are summarized in Table 3 with 
the modeled rate and adjusted limit with a 24-hour averaging rate. For 
more information on the modeling, emission limit sets, and averaging 
rate, see EPA's proposed attainment plan for this area.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See EPA's proposed attainment plan approval for the 
Muskingum River SO<INF>2</INF> nonattainment area. 88 FR 40726 (June 
22, 2023).

 Table 3--Globe's Modeled Attainment Rates and Final Attainment SO2 Emission Limits Included in Ohio's March 26,
                                                   2025, DFFOs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                Modeled 1-hour emission rate                    Final attainment 24-hour average
                                    combinations (lb/hr)                         SO2 emission limit combinations
                             ----------------------------------                              (lb/hr)
                                                                Modeled design ---------------------------------
     Emission limit set            Shop 1           Shop 2           value           Shop 1
                               Baghouse: P902   Baghouse: P907   ([micro]g/m3)   Baghouse: P902       Shop 2
                                (EAF 1) P903     (EAF 5) P908          *          (EAF 1) P903    Baghouse: P907
                                (EAF 2) P904       (EAF 7)                        (EAF 2) P904     (EAF 5) P908
                                  (EAF 3)                                           (EAF 3)          (EAF 7)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1...........................            210.0              0.0           149.6            195.3              0.0
2...........................            205.0             60.0             150            190.6             55.8
3...........................            200.0             80.0           146.8            186.0             74.4
4...........................            195.0            110.0           149.5            181.3            102.3
5...........................            190.0            125.0           150.6            176.7            116.2
6...........................            185.0            140.0           152.2            172.0            130.2
7...........................            180.0            155.0           153.8            167.4            144.1
8...........................            175.0            170.0           155.6            162.7            158.1
9...........................            170.0            180.0           157.9            158.1            167.4
10..........................            165.0            190.0           159.2            153.4            176.7
11..........................            160.0            200.0           162.8            148.8            186.0
12..........................            155.0            205.0           163.8            144.1            190.6
13..........................            150.0            210.0           165.4            139.5            195.3

[[Page 47689]]

 
14..........................            145.0            215.0           168.5            134.8            199.9
15..........................            140.0            220.0           171.6            130.2            204.6
16..........................            135.0            230.0           178.2            125.5            213.9
17..........................            130.0            235.0           181.3            120.9            218.5
18..........................            125.0            240.0           183.9            116.2            223.2
19..........................            120.0            240.0           184.4            111.6            223.2
20..........................            115.0            245.0             187            106.9            227.8
21..........................             95.0            250.0           188.9             88.3            232.5
22..........................             80.0            255.0           191.1             74.4            237.1
23..........................             65.0            260.0           193.4             60.4            241.8
24..........................             45.0            265.0           195.2             41.8            246.4
25..........................              0.0            270.0           194.7              0.0            251.1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Converting from [micro]g/m\3\ to ppb into Concentration (ppb) = 24.45 x concentration ([micro]g/m\3\) /
  molecular weight of SO2 (64.07 g/mol). The 75 ppb standard is equivalent to 196.5 [micro]g/m\3\.

    Ohio's modeled demonstration of attainment for EPA's modeling 
demonstrated a maximum design value of 194.7 [micro]g/m3, or 74.3 ppb, 
with the revised SO<INF>2</INF> emission limits that will provide for 
attainment based on the new requirements for Globe, which are both 
permanently and federally enforceable. EPA concluded that Ohio's 
modeling is a suitable demonstration that its requirements in the DFFOs 
for Globe were properly addressed in the attainment plan. EPA's 
supplemental modeling demonstrated that the updated limits for Globe 
provide for attainment and, along with monitoring data showing the area 
is attaining the standard, is the secondary basis to conclude that the 
area is attaining the 2010 SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS. Ohio's redesignation 
request for the Muskingum River SO<INF>2</INF> nonattainment area 
relied upon the demonstration of attainment based on the permanent 
shutdown of the Muskingum River Power Plant, the revised emission 
limits for Globe, and monitoring data from the nearest AQS monitors.
    In this action, EPA is proposing to find that the Muskingum River 
SO<INF>2</INF> nonattainment area has attained and will continue to 
attain the 2010 SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS with respect to the redesignation 
criteria under CAA section 107(d)(3)(E)(i).
    Criterion (2) and Criterion (5)--Ohio has met all applicable 
requirements under CAA section 110 and part D of the CAA, and EPA has 
fully approved the applicable implementation plan under CAA section 
110(k).
    For redesignation of an area from nonattainment to attainment of a 
NAAQS, the CAA requires EPA to determine that the State has met all 
applicable requirements under section 110 and part D of title I of the 
CAA (see section 107(d)(3)(E)(v) of the CAA) and that the State has a 
fully approved SIP under section 110(k) of the CAA (see section 
107(d)(3)(E)(ii) of the CAA). Part D is comprised of the general 
nonattainment area plan requirements in subpart 1 (section 172) as well 
as pollutant specific subparts, including section 191 (or subpart 5), 
which applies to areas designated nonattainment for SO<INF>2,</INF> 
nitrogen dioxide, or lead. While some nonattainment planning 
requirements are not applicable for purposes of CAA section 
107(d)(3)(E)(ii) and (v) for areas that are attaining the NAAQS, Ohio 
has in any case submitted a complete attainment plan and EPA has fully 
approved that plan, including emissions inventories, Reasonably 
Available Control Technology/Reasonably Available Control Measures, 
Reasonable Further Progress, and contingency measures.
    On April 3, 2015, and supplemented on October 13, 2015, March 13, 
2017, June 25, 2019, June 23, 2020, June 24, 2022, and May 24, 2023, 
Ohio submitted its attainment demonstration SIP for the Muskingum River 
SO<INF>2</INF> nonattainment area. EPA approved Ohio's attainment plan 
SIP effective October 10, 2023 (88 FR 61969). EPA has reviewed Ohio's 
SIP submittals and proposes to find that that by these submittals Ohio 
meets the general SIP requirements under section 110 of the CAA for the 
2010 SO<INF>2</INF> standard. Therefore, EPA proposes to find that Ohio 
has satisfied the requirements in section 110 and part D, and that Ohio 
has met all applicable SIP requirements for purposes of redesignation 
under section 119 and part D of title I of the CAA (requirements 
specific to nonattainment areas for the 2010 SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS).
    Additionally, EPA proposes to find that Ohio has a fully approved 
SIP under section 110(k) of the CAA. Section 110(a)(2) of the CAA 
delineates the general requirements for a SIP. Section 110(a)(2) 
provides that the SIP must have been adopted by the State after 
reasonable public notice and hearing, and that, among other things, it 
must: (1) include enforceable emission limitations and other control 
measures, means or techniques necessary to meet the requirements of the 
CAA; (2) provide for establishment and operation of appropriate 
devices, methods, systems and procedures necessary to monitor ambient 
air quality; (3) provide for implementation of a source permit program 
to regulate the modification and construction of stationary sources 
within the areas covered by the plan; (4) include provisions for the 
implementation of part C prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) 
and part D new source review permit programs; (5) include provisions 
for stationary source emission control measures, monitoring, and 
reporting; (6) include provisions for air quality modeling; and (7) 
provide for public and local agency participation in planning and 
emission control rule development.

[[Page 47690]]

    In Ohio's June 7, 2013, infrastructure SIP submission, Ohio 
verified that the State fulfills the requirements of section 110(a)(1) 
and section 110(a)(2) of the CAA with respect to the 2010 
SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS. Ohio's June 7, 2013, infrastructure SIP for the 
2010 SO<INF>2</INF> standard contains SIP approved Ohio Administrative 
Code Chapter 3745-18, through which SO<INF>2</INF> emissions are 
directly regulated. As discussed in ``Criterion 4,'' below, EPA already 
approved Ohio's base year emissions inventory and emission statement 
program as meeting the requirements of sections 110 and part D, and 
section 110(k), respectively, as they relate to the 2010 SO<INF>2</INF> 
NAAQS.\5\ EPA has determined which requirements are applicable for 
purposes of redesignation, and whether the required Ohio SIP elements 
are fully approved under section 110(k) and part D of the CAA. 
Therefore, EPA proposes to find that Ohio has met all applicable 
requirements under CAA section 110 and part D, including CAA section 
110(k).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Ohio submitted its 2011 base year inventory and 2018 future 
year inventory as a part of Ohio's October 13, 2015, attainment 
demonstration SIP, which was approved by EPA on October 11, 2018 (83 
FR 51361).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Criterion (3)--The Air Quality Improvement in the Muskingum River 
SO2 Nonattainment Area Is Due to Permanent and Enforceable Emission 
Reductions.
    To redesignate an area from nonattainment to attainment, section 
107(d)(3)(E)(iii) of the CAA requires EPA to determine that the air 
quality improvement in the area is due to permanent and enforceable 
reductions in emissions resulting from the implementation of the SIP 
and applicable Federal air pollution control regulations and other 
permanent and enforceable emission reductions.
    Ohio's attainment plan incorporates confirmation of the permanent 
shutdown of the Muskingum River Power Plant. In 2011, Muskingum River 
Power Plant accounted for approximately 99% of SO<INF>2</INF> emissions 
in the area--emitting 104,138.03 tons of SO<INF>2</INF> of the entire 
2011 EGU and non-EGU inventory of 105,341.03 tons of SO<INF>2</INF>. 
The last coal fired boiler at the Muskingum River Power Plant ceased 
operations on May 15, 2015, and all coal fired boilers at the facility 
were permanently retired on May 31, 2015. Emissions of SO<INF>2</INF>, 
by unit and for the entire facility, from 2011 through 2016 are shown 
in Table 4 below.

                                              Table 4--Muskingum River Power Plant SO2 Emissions 2011-2016
                                                                          [tpy]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          Unit                                 2011            2012            2013            2014            2015            2016
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
B001....................................................           16.33            0.28            0.25            0.38            0.00            0.00
B002....................................................        18190.00         2644.61            0.00            0.00            0.00            0.00
B003....................................................        17420.30         2887.61            0.00            0.00            0.00            0.00
B004....................................................        24684.50        15309.30        16273.40        13961.90            0.00            0.00
B005....................................................        24314.00         9431.73         3831.13         4337.55         1927.51            0.00
B006....................................................        19512.90         5864.48        12919.80        31276.80        13734.30            0.00
Facility................................................       104138.03        36138.01        33024.58        49576.63        15661.81            0.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As explained in further detail under ``Criterion 1,'' above, EPA 
approved Globe's limits into Ohio's SIP on January 18, 2022 (87 FR 
2555), and on September 8, 2023 (88 FR 61969), which renders them 
federally enforceable. Any new sources of SO<INF>2</INF> are limited by 
new source performance standards under sections 111 and 129 of the CAA; 
and the national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants under 
section 112 of the CAA.
    EPA is proposing to find, consistent with its approval of Ohio's 
attainment plan, that the combination of the Globe emission modeling 
results and the lack of emissions from other sources in the area 
demonstrates attainment and continued maintenance of the 2010 
SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS, and that the air quality improvement in the 
Muskingum River SO<INF>2</INF> nonattainment area is due to permanent 
and enforceable reductions in emissions.
    Criterion (4)--The Muskingum River SO2 Nonattainment Area Has a 
Fully Approved Maintenance Plan Pursuant to Section 175A.
    Section 175A of the CAA sets forth the elements of a maintenance 
plan for areas seeking redesignation from nonattainment to attainment. 
Under section 175A, the plan must demonstrate continued attainment of 
the applicable NAAQS for at least ten years after the nonattainment 
area is redesignated to attainment. Eight years after the 
redesignation, the State must submit a revised maintenance plan 
demonstrating that attainment will continue to be maintained for the 
ten years following the initial ten-year period. To address the 
possibility of future NAAQS violations, the maintenance plan must 
contain contingency measures as EPA deems necessary to ensure prompt 
correction of any future one-hour violations.
    Specifically, the maintenance plan should address five 
requirements: the attainment emissions inventory, maintenance 
demonstration, monitoring, verification of continued attainment, and a 
contingency plan. EPA is proposing to determine that Ohio's March 31, 
2025, redesignation request contains its maintenance plan and all the 
necessary components, which Ohio has committed to review eight years 
after the redesignation.

1. Attainment Emissions Inventory

    As a part of a State's maintenance plan, the air agency should 
develop an attainment emissions inventory to identify the level of 
emissions in the affected area which is sufficient to attain and 
maintain the SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS.\6\ Ohio submitted its 2011 base year 
inventory and 2018 future year inventory as a part of Ohio's October 
13, 2015, attainment demonstration SIP. In its redesignation request, 
Ohio provided an emissions inventory for SO<INF>2</INF> in the 
nonattainment area for 2015, which is one of the years in the design 
value where attainment was first achieved. See Table 5, below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See April 2014 SO<INF>2</INF> Guidance, page 66.

[[Page 47691]]



 Table 5--Muskingum River, Ohio (Waterford Township, Washington County, Plus Center Township, Morgan County) SO2
Emission Inventory Totals for 2011 Base, 2015 Attainment, 2026 Projected Interim, and 2038 Projected Maintenance
                (tpy), and Safety Margin Comparing 2015 Attainment to 2038 Projected Maintenance
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    2015      2026 Projected    2038 Projected
              Sector                2011 Base    Attainment       interim         maintenance     Safety margin
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EGU Point........................    104148.62     15687.43             22.98              0.01         15687.42
Non-EGU..........................      1192.41      1013.74           1842.84           1752.14          -738.40
Non-road.........................         0.06         0.05              0.01              0.01             0.04
On-road..........................         0.26         0.27              0.07              0.05             0.22
Other............................         4.66         4.33              2.53              2.55             1.78
                                  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total........................    105346.01     16705.82           1868.43           1754.76         17951.06
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Total actual emissions in the Muskingum River SO<INF>2</INF> 
nonattainment area for the 2015 attainment year were 16,705.82 tons. 
This level of emissions, in combination with emission limits set forth 
at the Globe facility, are sufficient to maintain the NAAQS. In its 
redesignation request, Ohio reported that total actual SO<INF>2</INF> 
emissions for the Muskingum River SO<INF>2</INF> nonattainment area 
from 2011, a year during which the area was not attaining the NAAQS, 
were 105,346.01 tons. The permanent shutdown of the Muskingum River 
Power Plant in 2015 led to decreases in actual SO<INF>2</INF> emissions 
by over 88,641 tons in the Muskingum River SO<INF>2</INF> nonattainment 
area when comparing the years 2011 and 2015. These data satisfy the 
attainment emissions inventory requirement for the Muskingum River 
SO<INF>2</INF> nonattainment area maintenance plan.

2. Maintenance Demonstration

    EPA's ``Procedures for Processing Requests to Redesignate Areas to 
Attainment'' (Calcagni Memo) \7\ describes two ways for a State to 
demonstrate maintenance of the NAAQS following the redesignation of the 
area: (1) the State can show that future emissions of a pollutant will 
not exceed the level of the attainment inventory, or (2) the State can 
model to show that the future mix of sources and emission rate will not 
cause a violation of the standard. In both instances, the demonstration 
should be for a period of 10 years following the redesignation. 
Furthermore, the plan should contain a summary of air quality 
concentrations resulting from control measures implemented where 
modeling is relied upon to demonstrate maintenance. Ohio's maintenance 
demonstration consists of the attainment SIP air quality modeling 
analysis showing that the emission reductions now in effect in the 
Muskingum River SO<INF>2</INF> nonattainment area will provide for 
attainment of the 2010 SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS for the 2026 projected 
interim date and will also be below the 2015 attainment year totals by 
the year 2038 projected maintenance date. The permanent and enforceable 
SO<INF>2</INF> emission reductions described above ensure that the area 
emissions will be equal to or less than the emission levels that were 
evaluated in the air quality modeling analysis, and Ohio's enforceable 
emission requirements will ensure that the Muskingum River area 
SO<INF>2</INF> emission limits are met continuously.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Calcagni, John, Director, Air Quality Management Division, 
EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, ``Procedures for 
Processing Requests to Redesignate Areas to Attainment,'' September 
4, 1992.

 Table 6--Muskingum River, Ohio (Waterford Township, Washington County, Plus Center Township, Morgan County) Emission Estimates (tpy) Comparing the 2015
                                                     Attainment Year to Projected Maintenance Dates
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          2015        2026 Projected       2026 Projected      2038 Projected        2038 Projected
                                                       Attainment        interim          interim decrease      maintenance       maintenance decrease
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SO2.................................................    16705.82              1868.43             14837.69            1754.76                  14951.06
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As demonstrated in Table 6, SO<INF>2</INF> emissions in the area 
are projected to decrease by almost 15,000 tpy in 2026 and 2038 from 
2015 attainment levels, which demonstrates maintenance.

3. Monitoring

    By providing actual monitoring data from the national emissions 
inventory and State inventory databases (e.g., Ohio's Emission 
Inventory System), for non-road EGU and non-EGU point sources of 
SO<INF>2</INF>, from time periods including when the area was not 
meeting the NAAQS (2011) and when the area was attaining the NAAQS 
(2015), Ohio has demonstrated a 99 percent reduction in actual annual 
SO<INF>2</INF> emissions in the area. Ohio's monitoring, described 
above, shows the combination of the 2015 Muskingum River Power Plant 
shutdown and the newly imposed and federally enforceable DFFOs 
SO<INF>2</INF> limits for Globe result in the area maintaining 
attainment of the SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS.

4. Verification of Continued Attainment

    For continuing verification, Ohio will track the emissions and 
compliance status of the Globe facility in the Muskingum River 
SO<INF>2</INF> nonattainment area so that future emissions will not 
exceed the allowable emissions-based attainment inventory. All major 
sources in Ohio are required to submit annual emissions data, which the 
State uses to update its emission inventories as required by the CAA. 
The Globe facility must submit annual compliance certifications to 
ensure the facility is meeting its SIP limits and the facility must 
submit a semi-annual Monitoring Report to Ohio, summarizing required 
monitoring results and identifying all instances of deviation from the 
permit and other regulations.
    Ohio will also continue operating its air quality monitoring 
network to verify maintenance of the attainment status of the Muskingum 
River SO<INF>2</INF>

[[Page 47692]]

nonattainment area. The closest monitor to the Muskingum River 
SO<INF>2</INF> nonattainment area is the Globe monitor (AQS ID: 39-167-
0011). Ohio will provide EPA with annual emissions reports as part of 
Ohio's annual network plan submittal to provide ongoing verification of 
attainment and will consult with EPA prior to discontinuing

5. Contingency Plan

    Section 175A(d) of the CAA provides that a maintenance plan must 
contain contingency provisions that will promptly correct any violation 
of the SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS after the area is redesignated to 
attainment.\8\ The maintenance plan should identify the contingency 
measures to be adopted, a schedule and procedure for adoption and 
implementation, and a time limit for action by the State.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See also Calcagni Memo.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A State should also identify specific indicators to be used to 
determine when the contingency measures need to be implemented. The 
maintenance plan must also include a requirement that a State will 
implement all measures with respect to control of the pollutant that 
were contained in the SIP before redesignation of the area to 
attainment in accordance with section 175A(d). Unlike CAA section 
172(c)(9), section l75A of the CAA does not explicitly require that 
contingency measures must take effect without further action by the air 
agency in order for the maintenance plan to be approved. However, the 
maintenance plan's contingency plan would become an enforceable part of 
the SIP and should ensure that contingency measures are adopted and 
implemented as expeditiously as practicable once they are triggered.\9\ 
In the ``General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the 
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,'' published on April 16, 1992 (57 FR 
13498), EPA provides further discussion of contingency measures for 
SO<INF>2</INF>. This guidance states that in many cases, attainment 
revolves around compliance of a single source or a small set of sources 
with emission limits shown to provide for attainment. Although this 
guidance applies to contingency measures under section 172(c)(9), EPA 
applies a similar policy with respect to contingency measures for 
SO<INF>2</INF> required in maintenance plans under section 175A(d). The 
requirement to submit contingency measures in accordance with section 
175A of the CAA can be adequately addressed for SO<INF>2</INF> by the 
operation of a comprehensive enforcement program,\10\ which can quickly 
identify and address sources that might be causing exceedances of the 
NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See April 2014 SO<INF>2</INF> Guidance, page 74.
    \10\ See April 2014 SO<INF>2</INF> Guidance, page 41-42
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Ohio's enforcement program is active and capable of prompt action 
to remedy compliance issues. Ohio commits to ongoing compliance and 
enforcement of the control measures contained in the DFFOs issued to 
Globe that were approved and incorporated into the Ohio SIP (88 FR 
61969), and the newly issued March 26, 2025, DFFOs proposed for 
approval in this action. In its redesignation request, Ohio commits to 
review its maintenance plan eight years after redesignation, as 
required by section 175A of the CAA. Ohio also has the necessary 
resources in the event of violations to enforce its permit provisions 
and rules. Ohio has the authority to expeditiously adopt, implement, 
and enforce any subsequent emission control measures deemed necessary 
to correct any future SO<INF>2</INF> violations. Ohio commits to 
adopting and implementing such corrective actions as necessary to 
address violations of the SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS. Another contingency 
measure option is the implementation of a PSD program for new or 
modified existing sources of SO<INF>2</INF>, which includes 
requirements for Best Available Control Technology, in the Muskingum 
River SO<INF>2</INF> nonattainment area once redesignated to 
attainment. The Globe DFFOs have been adopted into the Ohio SIP and 
include emission limits, monitoring, recordkeeping, compliance testing 
and reporting requirements that will be used to confirm ongoing 
compliance. Based on the foregoing, EPA proposes to find that Ohio has 
addressed the contingency measure requirement.
    EPA is proposing to find that Ohio's maintenance plan adequately 
addresses the five basic components of a maintenance plan necessary to 
maintain the SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS in the Muskingum River SO<INF>2</INF> 
nonattainment area. Therefore, EPA proposes to find that the 
redesignation and maintenance plan SIP revision submitted by Ohio for 
the Muskingum River SO<INF>2</INF> nonattainment area meets the 
requirements of section 175A of the CAA and proposes to approve this 
plan.

IV. What action is EPA taking?

    EPA is proposing to redesignate the Muskingum River SO<INF>2</INF> 
nonattainment area from nonattainment to attainment for the 2010 
SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS in accordance with Ohio's March 31, 2025, request. 
EPA has determined that the area is attaining the 2010 SO<INF>2</INF> 
NAAQS and that the improvement in air quality is due to permanent and 
enforceable SO<INF>2</INF> emission reductions in the area. EPA is also 
proposing to approve Ohio's maintenance plan, which is designed to 
ensure that the area will continue to maintain attainment of the 2010 
SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS. Finally, EPA is proposing to approve Ohio's DFFOs 
issued to Globe on March 26, 2025, which set forth emission limits and 
other requirements that will provide for attainment of the 2010 
SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS in this area.

V. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule 
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance 
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by 
reference Ohio's DFFOs issued to Globe, effective March 26, 2025, 
discussed in section II. of this preamble. EPA has made, and will 
continue to make, these documents generally available through 
<a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a> and at the EPA Region 5 Office (please contact the 
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of 
this preamble for more information).

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, redesignation of an area to attainment and the 
accompanying approval of a maintenance plan are actions that affect the 
status of a geographical area and do not impose any additional 
regulatory requirements on sources beyond those imposed by State law. A 
redesignation to attainment does not in and of itself create any new 
requirements, but rather results in the applicability of requirements 
contained in the CAA for areas that have been redesignated to 
attainment. Moreover, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable 
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and 
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State 
law. For these reasons, this action:
    <bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review 
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
    <bullet> Is not subject to Executive Order 14192 (90 FR 9065, 
February 6, 2025) because SIP actions are exempt from review under 
Executive Order 12866;
    <bullet> Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions

[[Page 47693]]

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
    <bullet> Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
    <bullet> Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
    <bullet> Does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
    <bullet> Is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, 
April 23, 1997) because it approves a State program;
    <bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
    <bullet> Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA.
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has 
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 
country, the rule does not have Tribal implications and will not impose 
substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law as 
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Sulfur oxides.

    Dated: September 23, 2025.
Cheryl Newton,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2025-19278 Filed 10-1-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on October 2, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.