Notice2025-18564

Stainless Steel Plate in Coils From Belgium: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
September 25, 2025

Issuing agencies

Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Aperam Stainless Belgium N.V. (ASB) did not make sales of stainless steel plate in coils from Belgium at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), May 1, 2023, through April 30, 2024.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 184 (Thursday, September 25, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 184 (Thursday, September 25, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46184-46185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-18564]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-423-808]


Stainless Steel Plate in Coils From Belgium: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that 
Aperam Stainless Belgium N.V. (ASB) did not make sales of stainless 
steel plate in coils from Belgium at less than normal value (NV) during 
the period of review (POR), May 1, 2023, through April 30, 2024.

DATES: Applicable September 25, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samuel Brummitt, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-7851.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On June 4, 2025, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this 
review in the Federal Register and invited interested parties to 
comment.\1\ On June 23, 2025, Commerce suspended the briefing schedule 
in order to issue a post-preliminary analysis.\2\ On August 14, 2025, 
Commerce issued a post-preliminary analysis memorandum replacing the 
Cohen's d test with the ``price difference test.'' \3\ On August 18, 
2025, Commerce re-established the briefing schedule and invited 
interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results and the post-
preliminary analysis; however, no interested party submitted 
comments.\4\ Accordingly, we made no changes to the post-preliminary 
analysis, and thus, no decision memorandum accompanies this notice. 
Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with 
section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from Belgium: Preliminary 
Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2023-2024, 90 FR 23670 (June 4, 2025) (Preliminary Results), 
and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Suspension of Deadline for Case Briefs,'' 
dated June 23, 2025.
    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Post-Preliminary Analysis for the 
Administrative Review of Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from 
Belgium,'' dated August 14, 2025 (Post-Preliminary Memorandum).
    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Reestablishing Briefing Schedule,'' dated 
August 18, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order <SUP>5</SUP>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Certain Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from Belgium, 
Canada, Italy, the Republic of Korea, South Africa, and Taiwan, 64 
FR 27756 (May 21, 1999) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The merchandise covered by this Order is stainless steel plate in 
coils from Belgium. For a complete description of the scope, see the 
Preliminary Results.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Preliminary Results PDM at 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    On June 13 and June 16, 2025, respectively, the U.S. Court of 
Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) issued mandates based 
on the Federal Circuit's opinions in Marmen and Stupp.\7\ In its 
opinions, the Federal Circuit held that it is unreasonable to use the 
Cohen's d test when the Cohen's d test is applied to data that do not 
satisfy certain statistical criteria. Accordingly, to comply with the 
Federal Circuit's holdings regarding the Cohen's d test, Commerce 
revised the differential pricing analysis used in the Preliminary 
Results in a post-preliminary analysis.\8\ Commerce has made no other 
changes for these final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Marmen Inc. v. United States, 134 F.4th 1334 (Fed. Cir. 
2025) (Marmen); Stupp Corp. v. United States, No. 23-1663, 2025 WL 
1178392 (Fed. Cir. 2025) (non-precedential) (Stupp).
    \8\ See Post-Preliminary Memorandum; see also, Memorandum, 
``Post-Preliminary Sales and Cost Calculation Memorandum for Aperam 
Stainless Belgium N.V.,'' dated August 14, 2025 (Post-Preliminary 
Calculation Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Review

    In the Preliminary Results, we determined that ASB did not make 
sales of subject merchandise at less than NV during the POR. As noted 
above, Commerce received no comments concerning the Preliminary Results 
or the post-preliminary analysis. Therefore, for these final results, 
Commerce continues to determine that the following weighted-average 
dumping margin exists for the period May 1, 2023, through April 30, 
2024:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                    Producer or exporter                        dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aperam Stainless Belgium N.V................................        0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    Normally, Commerce discloses to interested parties the calculations 
of the final results of an administrative review within five days of a 
public announcement or, if there is no public

[[Page 46185]]

announcement, within five days of the date of publication of the notice 
of final results in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.224(b). However, because we have made no changes to the Preliminary 
Results other than those discussed in the Post-Preliminary Memorandum 
and Post-Preliminary Calculation Memorandum, for which we received no 
comments, there are no new calculations to disclose.

Assessment Rate

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1), Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries covered by this review. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), where 
the respondent reported the entered value of its U.S. sales, we 
calculated importer-specific antidumping duty assessment rates by 
aggregating the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined 
sales of each importer and dividing each of these amounts by the total 
entered value associated with those sales. Where the respondent did not 
report entered value, we calculated a per-unit assessment rate for each 
importer by dividing the total amount of dumping calculated for the 
examined sales made to that importer by the total quantity associated 
with those sales. To determine whether an importer-specific, per-unit 
assessment rate is de minimis, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), 
we also calculated an importer-specific ad valorem ratio based on 
estimated entered values. Where either the respondent's weighted-
average dumping margin is zero or de minimis within the meaning of 19 
CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or 
de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries 
without regard to antidumping duties.
    Commerce's ``reseller policy'' will apply to entries of subject 
merchandise during the POR produced by ASB for which the reviewed 
company did not know that the merchandise it sold to the intermediary 
(e.g., a reseller, trading company, or exporter) was destined for the 
United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate 
unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the 
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier 
than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this 
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the 
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will 
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties 
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 
90 days of publication). The final results of this administrative 
review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on 
entries of merchandise under review and for future cash deposits of 
estimated antidumping duties, where applicable.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for ASB will be 
zero, the rate established in the final results of this review; (2) for 
merchandise exported by a company not covered in this administrative 
review but covered in a completed prior segment of the proceeding, the 
cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate 
published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; 
(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review or completed 
prior segment of this proceeding but the producer is, the cash deposit 
rate will be the company-specific rate established for the most 
recently-completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the 
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 
producers or exporters will continue to be 9.86 percent, the rate 
established in the original investigation of this proceeding.\10\ These 
cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until 
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Order, 64 FR at 27757.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement 
of antidumping duties has occurred and the subsequent assessment of 
double antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order (APO)

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to 
an APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of 
proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary 
information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or 
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure 
to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a 
sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 
19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: September 19, 2025.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2025-18564 Filed 9-24-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on September 25, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.