Notice2025-18039

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the NYSE Arca Equities Fees and Charges

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
September 18, 2025

Issuing agencies

Securities and Exchange Commission

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 179 (Thursday, September 18, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 179 (Thursday, September 18, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45067-45069]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-18039]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-103970; File No. SR-NYSEARCA-2025-68]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing 
and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the NYSE 
Arca Equities Fees and Charges

September 15, 2025.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given 
that on September 2, 2025, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or the 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory 
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE Arca Equities Fees and 
Charges (``Fee Schedule'') regarding the gross FOCUS fee charged to ETP 
Holders (``Gross FOCUS Fee''), effective September 2, 2025. The 
proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's website at 
<a href="http://www.nyse.com">www.nyse.com</a> and at the principal office of the Exchange.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared 
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most 
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule to (1) provide for 
a temporary waiver of the Gross FOCUS fee from September 2, 2025 
through December 31, 2025 (the ``Waiver Period'').
    The Exchange proposes to implement the fee changes effective 
September 2, 2025.
Background
    Generally, the Exchange may only use regulatory fees ``to fund the 
legal, regulatory and surveillance operations'' of the Exchange.\4\ 
Consistent with the foregoing, the Exchange currently charges each ETP 
Holder a monthly regulatory fee of $0.069 per $1,000 of gross revenue 
reported on its FOCUS Report (``Gross FOCUS Fee'').\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See NYSE Arca, Inc. Bylaws, Art. II, Sec. 2.03 (Dividends; 
Regulatory Fees and Penalties).
    \5\ FOCUS is an acronym for Financial and Operational Combined 
Uniform Single Report. FOCUS Reports are filed periodically with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'' or ``SEC'') 
as SEC Form X-17A-5 pursuant to Rule 17a-5 under the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The revenue collected pursuant to the Gross FOCUS Fee funds the 
performance of the Exchange's regulatory activities with respect to ETP 
Holders, including surveillance operations expenses. More specifically, 
the revenue generated by the Gross FOCUS Fee funds a material portion, 
but not all, of the Exchange's expenses related to its regulatory 
program, including legal expenses associated with regulation, the costs 
related to in-house staff, third-party service providers, and 
technology that facilitates regulatory functions such as surveillance, 
investigation, examinations, and enforcement. Gross FOCUS Fee funds may 
also be used for indirect expenses such as human resources and other 
administrative costs (collectively, ``Regulatory Costs'').
    The Exchange monitors the amount of revenue collected from the 
Gross FOCUS Fee to ensure that these funds, in combination with its 
other regulatory fees and fines, do not exceed Regulatory Costs. The 
Exchange monitors Regulatory Costs and revenues on an annual basis, at 
a minimum. If the Exchange determines that regulatory revenues exceed 
or are projected to exceed Regulatory Costs, the Exchange will adjust 
the Gross FOCUS Fee downward or seek a partial waiver of the fee by 
submitting a filing to the Commission. As described below, the Exchange 
has determined that continued collection of Gross FOCUS Fees at the 
current rate for the proposed Waiver Period would exceed a material 
portion of the Exchange's anticipated Regulatory Costs, justifying the 
proposed waiver of the Gross FOCUS Fee for ETP Holders through the end 
of 2025.
Proposed Rule Change
    Based on the Exchange's recent review of current and anticipated 
Regulatory Costs and Gross FOCUS Fee revenue, the Exchange proposes to 
waive the Gross FOCUS Fee from September 2, 2025 through December 31, 
2025, in order to help ensure that the amounts collected from the Gross 
FOCUS Fee, in combination with other regulatory fees and fines, do not 
exceed the Exchange's total projected

[[Page 45068]]

Regulatory Costs. The Exchange proposes to waive the Gross FOCUS Fee 
because it believes that if the fee is not adjusted, Gross FOCUS Fee 
revenue to the Exchange year-over-year could exceed a material portion 
of the Exchange's Regulatory Costs. The Exchange's position is based on 
its periodic analysis of actual and anticipated costs to fund its 
regulatory program and revenue to offset those costs, including the 
Gross FOCUS Fee, and takes into consideration both that the last Gross 
FOCUS Fee adjustment was more than three years ago, and the projected 
regulatory spending landscape going forward. Moreover, the Exchange 
believes that a four-month waiver rather than adjusting the fee would 
most efficiently accomplish the goal of reasonably ensuring that Gross 
FOCUS Fee collection does not exceed anticipated Regulatory Costs and 
allow for further consideration of the appropriate Gross FOCUS Fee rate 
going forward.
    The Exchange would announce the proposed waiver of the Gross FOCUS 
Fee by Trader Update.
    The proposed change is not otherwise intended to address other 
issues, and the Exchange is not aware of any significant problems that 
market participants would have in complying with the proposed changes.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with the provisions of Section 6(b) \6\ of the Act, in general, and 
Section 6(b)(4) and (5) \7\ of the Act, in particular, in that it is 
designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, 
fees, and other charges among its members and other persons using its 
facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between customers, 
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Proposal Is Reasonable
    The Exchange believes the proposed fee change is reasonable because 
it would help ensure that revenue collected from the Gross FOCUS Fee 
does not exceed a material portion of the Exchange's projected 
Regulatory Costs. The Exchange has targeted the Gross FOCUS Fee to 
generate revenues that would be less than or equal to the Exchange's 
regulatory costs, which is consistent with both Rule 129 and the 
Commission's view that regulatory fees be used for regulatory purposes. 
As noted above, the principle that the Exchange may only use regulatory 
fees ``to fund the legal, regulatory, and surveillance operations'' of 
the Exchange is reflected in the Exchange's operating agreement.\8\ In 
this regard, the Gross FOCUS Fee has been calculated to recover a 
material portion, but not all, of the Exchange's Regulatory Costs. As 
also noted above, based on the Exchange's recent review of current and 
projected regulatory costs and Gross FOCUS Fee collections, a four-
month waiver of the Gross FOCUS Fee, which was last adjusted more than 
three years ago, would be the most efficient way to lessen the 
potential for generating excess funds that may otherwise occur using 
the current rate and allow for further consideration of the appropriate 
Gross FOCUS Fee rate going forward. The Exchange thus believes that the 
proposed waiver would be a fair and reasonable method for ensuring that 
the amounts collected from the Gross FOCUS Fee, in combination with 
other regulatory fees and fines, do not potentially exceed Regulatory 
Costs. The Exchange further believes that resuming the current rate as 
of January 1, 2026, would be reasonable because it would permit the 
Exchange to resume assessing the Gross Focus Fee in a way that is 
designed to recover a material portion, but not all, of the Exchange's 
projected Regulatory Costs. The Exchange would continue monitoring 
Regulatory Costs in advance of the fee resumption next year and, if the 
Exchange determines that the rate should be further modified to help 
ensure that Gross FOCUS Fee collections would not exceed a material 
portion of Regulatory Costs, would make an appropriate rule filing with 
the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See note 4, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Proposal Is an Equitable Allocation of Fees
    The Exchange believes its proposal is an equitable allocation of 
fees among its market participants. The Exchange further believes that 
the proposed Gross FOCUS Fee waiver would benefit all ETP Holders 
because all ETP Holders would be eligible for the waiver, and would 
benefit from the waiver, on full and equal terms. For the same reasons, 
the proposed waiver neither targets nor will it have a disparate impact 
on any particular category of market participant. All ETP Holders would 
qualify for the waiver of the Gross FOCUS Fee on an equal and non-
discriminatory basis. The Exchange also believes that recommencing the 
Gross FOCUS Fee effective January 1, 2026, at the current rate, unless 
the Exchange determines it would be necessary to further adjust the 
fee, is equitable because the Gross FOCUS Fee would resume applying to 
all ETP Holders on an equal basis.
The Proposed Fee Is Not Unfairly Discriminatory
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is not unfairly 
discriminatory. The proposed waiver of the Gross FOCUS Fee would 
benefit all similarly-situated market participants on an equal and non-
discriminatory basis. Moreover, the proposal neither targets nor will 
it have a disparate impact on any particular category of market 
participant. The proposed fee change is designed to pause collection of 
a fee that applies to ETP Holders on an equal and non-discriminatory 
basis, waiver of which would apply to and benefit all ETP Holders 
equally. The Exchange also believes that recommencing the Gross FOCUS 
Fee on January 1, 2026, at the current rate, unless the Exchange 
determines it would be necessary to further adjust the rate to ensure 
that collections do not exceed a material portion of its Regulatory 
Costs, is not unfairly discriminatory because the resumed fee would 
apply equally to all ETP Holders.
    For the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal 
is consistent with the Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not 
believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on 
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act.
    Intramarket Competition. The Exchange believes the proposed fee 
change would not impose an undue burden on competition as the fee 
waiver would apply to all ETP Holders on an equal and non-
discriminatory basis. The Exchange believes that the proposed waiver 
would also not place certain market participants at an unfair 
disadvantage because all ETP Holders would be eligible for the same 
waiver. For the same reasons, the proposed fee waiver neither targets 
nor will it have a disparate impact on any particular category of 
market participant. All similarly-situated ETP Holders would be 
eligible for the proposed waiver. The Exchange also believes 
recommencing the Gross FOCUS Fee on January 1, 2026, at the same 
current rate (unless the Exchange determines it necessary at that time 
to adjust the fee to ensure that

[[Page 45069]]

collections do not exceed a material portion of its Regulatory Costs) 
would not impose an undue burden on competition because the proposed 
rate would apply equally to all ETP Holders subject to the Gross FOCUS 
Fee and would permit the Exchange to resume assessing a fee that is 
designed to recover a material portion, but not all, of the Exchange's 
projected Regulatory Costs.
    Intermarket Competition. The proposed fee change is not designed to 
address any competitive issues. Rather, the proposed change is designed 
to help the Exchange adequately fund its regulatory activities while 
seeking to ensure that total collections from regulatory fees do not 
exceed total Regulatory Costs.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,\9\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(2) thereunder \10\ the Exchange has designated this proposal as 
establishing or changing a due, fee, or other charge imposed on any 
person, whether or not the person is a member of the self-regulatory 
organization, which renders the proposed rule change effective upon 
filing. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

    <bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
    <bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a2d0d7cec78fc1cdcfcfc7ccd6d1e2d1c7c18cc5cdd4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6012150c054d030f0d0d050e1413201305034e070f16">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. Please include 
file number SR-NYSEARCA-2025-68 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

    <bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSEARCA-2025-68. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). Copies of the filing will be available for inspection and 
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include 
personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit 
only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may 
redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material 
that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions 
should refer to file number SR-NYSEARCA-2025-68 and should be submitted 
on or before October 9, 2025.
    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-18039 Filed 9-17-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on September 18, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.