Notice2025-17729

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Establish a New Collateral-in-Lieu Offering Within the Sponsored GC Service, and Expand the Sponsored GC Service To Allow a Sponsoring Member To Submit for Clearing a “Done-Away” Sponsored GC Trade

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
September 15, 2025

Issuing agencies

Securities and Exchange Commission

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 176 (Monday, September 15, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 176 (Monday, September 15, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44408-44424]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-17729]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-103940; File No. SR-FICC-2025-019]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation; 
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Establish a New Collateral-
in-Lieu Offering Within the Sponsored GC Service, and Expand the 
Sponsored GC Service To Allow a Sponsoring Member To Submit for 
Clearing a ``Done-Away'' Sponsored GC Trade

September 10, 2025.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on August 29, 2025, Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (``FICC'') filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the 
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and III below, which 
Items have been prepared by the clearing agency. The Commission is 
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change 
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the 
Proposed Rule Change

    The proposed rule change consists of amendments to the FICC 
Government Securities Division (``GSD'') Rulebook (``Rules'') \3\ to 
(i) establish a new Collateral-in-Lieu (``CIL'') offering (``CIL 
Service'') within the existing Sponsored GC Service, and (ii) expand 
the Sponsored GC Service to allow a Sponsoring Member to submit for 
clearing a ``done-away'' Sponsored GC Trade (i.e., a Sponsored GC Trade 
between its Sponsored Member and either a Netting Member other than the 
Sponsoring Member or another Indirect Participant of any Netting 
Member). The proposed rule changes are designed to facilitate access to 
FICC's clearance and settlement services, including by indirect 
participants, in accordance with the requirements of Rule 17ad-
22(e)(18) under the Act.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Capitalized terms not defined herein are defined in the 
Rules, available at <a href="http://www.dtcc.com/legal/rules-and-procedures">http://www.dtcc.com/legal/rules-and-procedures</a>.
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(18).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis 
for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the clearing agency included 
statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule 
change and discussed

[[Page 44409]]

any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these 
statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. 
The clearing agency has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, 
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

(A) Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis 
for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
Executive Summary of Proposed Changes
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the Rules to 
(i) establish the CIL Service to be available within GSD's Sponsored GC 
Service, and (ii) expand the Sponsored GC Service to allow a Sponsoring 
Member to submit for clearing a ``done-away'' Sponsored GC Trade (i.e., 
a Sponsored GC Trade between its Sponsored Member and either a Netting 
Member other than the Sponsoring Member or another Indirect Participant 
of any Netting Member).
    The CIL Service would leverage much of the legal and operational 
framework applicable to FICC's existing Sponsored GC Service, but with 
certain adjustments designed to increase the ability of registered 
investment companies (``RICs'') and other cash providers to access 
FICC's clearance and settlement system for repurchase transactions. In 
particular, the CIL Service would use a lien in favor of FICC on the 
Purchased GC Repo Securities to reduce the margin and capital costs of 
providing RICs and other cash providers with access to FICC's clearance 
and settlement systems, and would facilitate the ability of RICs and 
other cash providers to clear transactions executed through joint 
trading accounts.
    Under the proposed CIL Service, a Sponsoring Member would be 
eligible to submit to FICC for clearance and settlement a repurchase 
transaction (``Sponsored GC CIL Trade'') entered into by its Sponsored 
Member as cash provider (``CIL Funds Lender'') with the Sponsoring 
Member (i.e., ``done-with'') or with another Netting Member or any 
Netting Member's Indirect Participant (i.e., ``done-away'') and for 
such transaction to settle through the tri-party platform operated by a 
Sponsored GC Clearing Agent Bank. The Sponsored GC CIL Trade would 
generally be treated as a Sponsored GC Trade under the Rules, but with 
certain key differences.
    First, the Rules would provide for each CIL Funds Lender to grant 
FICC a security interest in the Purchased GC Repo Securities subject to 
the Sponsored GC CIL Trade to secure the CIL Funds Lender's obligations 
under the transaction. The purpose of this lien is to eliminate the 
``double margining'' that FICC understands from its engagement with 
market participants operates as a constraint on the ability of 
Sponsoring Members to provide clearance and settlement services to RICs 
and other cash providers.\5\ ``Double margining'' refers to the cost to 
a Sponsoring Member associated with funding both (1) a ``haircut'', 
which refers to the amount of securities posted to a RIC or other cash 
provider in excess of the cash funding provided under a repurchase 
transaction, and (2) initial margin posted to FICC with respect to the 
same transaction. Market participants have conveyed to FICC that the 
combined funding costs of these two sums limit the capacity of 
Sponsoring Members to clear Sponsored GC Trades entered into by RICs 
and other cash providers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Letter from Ken Bentsen, President & CEO, SIFMA, et al. 
to Mark Uyeda, Jan. 24, 2025, in Release No. 34-95763, File No. S7-
23-22, at 2, available at <a href="https://www.sifma.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/SIFMA-Extension-Request-US-Treasury-Clearing-Mandate-FINAL-Clean.pdf">https://www.sifma.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/SIFMA-Extension-Request-US-Treasury-Clearing-Mandate-FINAL-Clean.pdf</a> (describing ``SEC-registered fund rules that effectively 
require double margining for cleared repos'' as a critical issue 
that needs to be resolved in advance of the compliance date of the 
Trade Submission Requirement (as defined below)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The lien granted by the CIL Funds Lender to FICC would serve to 
eliminate ``double margining'' by largely obviating the need for FICC 
to collect initial margin with respect to a Sponsored GC CIL Trade. The 
lien would allow FICC to use the Purchased GC Repo Securities to 
complete settlement with the CIL Funds Lender's pre-Novation 
counterparty (i.e., the GC Funds Borrower) under the Sponsored GC CIL 
Trade in the event the CIL Funds Lender or its Sponsoring Member 
defaulted. As a result, it would, with limited exceptions, eliminate 
the need for FICC to collect initial margin to address the risk that 
the CIL Funds Lender fails to deliver such securities.\6\ In addition, 
by ensuring that FICC would be able to obtain the Purchased GC Repo 
Securities underlying the Sponsored GC CIL Trade, the lien would 
eliminate the need for the Sponsoring Member to guarantee the CIL Funds 
Lender's obligations under a Sponsored GC CIL Trade. That, in turn, 
would reduce the regulatory capital requirements, and thus the costs to 
the Sponsoring Member, of providing the CIL Funds Lender with access to 
FICC's clearance and settlement services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ As noted below, FICC would still collect initial margin with 
respect to certain done-with Sponsored GC CIL Trades and would 
require that Sponsored GC CIL Trades have an Initial Haircut that is 
no less than the CIL Required Haircut (as such term would be defined 
in the Rules). See Rule 1, supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Second, the CIL Service would allow a Sponsoring Member to submit 
to FICC for clearance and settlement transactions that have been 
entered into by multiple RICs or other CIL Funds Lenders using a 
``joint trading account.'' FICC understands from its engagement with 
market participants that a number of RICs and other cash providers 
utilize joint trading accounts because they provide various 
efficiencies. However, the Sponsored GC Service does not currently 
allow a Sponsoring Member to submit to FICC for clearance and 
settlement a transaction entered into through a joint trading account, 
unless the investment adviser for the joint trading account's 
participants has specified each participant's respective portion of the 
transaction. As described in greater detail below, FICC understands 
from its engagement with market participants that this process, 
generally referred to as ``allocation,'' often cannot be completed 
before the FICC submission deadline for the Sponsored GC Service. This 
is because an investment adviser generally needs information regarding 
the various participants' current cash positions before it can perform 
an allocation, and such information takes time to compile and examine. 
As a result, participants in a joint trading account are often unable 
to have their transactions submitted to FICC for clearing. Accordingly, 
FICC believes that allowing Sponsoring Members to submit Sponsored GC 
CIL Trades entered into by a joint trading account even before such 
transactions have been allocated would facilitate the ability of RICs 
and other cash providers to access FICC's clearance and settlement 
services.
    Lastly, the CIL Service would not require Sponsored Members to 
exchange Funds-Only Settlement Amount payments with FICC in relation to 
Sponsored GC CIL Trades. FICC understands from its engagement with 
market participants that RICs and other cash providers are in many 
cases not operationally able to make or receive twice daily Funds-Only 
Settlement Amount payments and that a Sponsoring Member's receipt or 
collection of such amounts on behalf of a RIC or other cash provider 
could implicate various regulatory considerations.\7\ FICC understands 
that it is therefore common practice for Sponsoring Members and their 
Sponsored Members in the existing Sponsored GC Service to agree for the

[[Page 44410]]

Sponsoring Member to satisfy the relevant Funds-Only Settlement Amount 
obligations of the Sponsored Member and to receive any such amounts due 
to the Sponsored Member. However, such practice may be infeasible or 
expensive at greater scale, particularly if the transactions at issue 
are term transactions or ``done-away'' ones. Furthermore, because the 
lien in favor of FICC on the Purchased GC Repo Securities ensures that 
FICC will be able to look to such securities for the CIL Funds Lender's 
performance, FICC does not need to collect Funds-Only Settlement 
Amounts to address the possibility of the CIL Funds Lender defaulting 
and the need for a replacement transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See, e.g., 15 U.S.C. 80a-17(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As mentioned above, the CIL Service would allow a Sponsoring Member 
to submit to FICC for clearance and settlement Sponsored GC Trades that 
have been entered into on a done-with basis (i.e., between a CIL Funds 
Lender and its own Sponsoring Member) or on a done-away basis (i.e., 
between its Sponsored Member and either a Netting Member other than the 
Sponsoring Member or another Indirect Participant of any Netting 
Member). In connection with these changes, FICC is also proposing to 
amend the existing Sponsored GC Service to allow Sponsoring Members to 
submit transactions entered into by a Sponsored Member on a done-away 
basis for clearing. FICC believes that improving the ability of RICs 
and other cash providers to engage in done-away transactions can 
facilitate access by increasing the available scope of possible 
counterparties.\8\ Accordingly, allowing a Sponsoring Member to submit 
to FICC through the CIL Service or Sponsored GC Service transactions 
entered into by its Sponsored Member either on a done-away or on a 
done-with basis should facilitate greater access to FICC's clearance 
and settlement systems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See, e.g., Letter from Joanna Mallers, Secretary, FIA 
Principal Traders Group to Vanessa Countryman, Apr. 17, 2024, in 
Release No. 34-99844, File No. SR-FICC-2024-007, at 3, available at 
<a href="https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-ficc-2024-007/srficc2024007-459391-1190934.pdf">https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-ficc-2024-007/srficc2024007-459391-1190934.pdf</a> (emphasizing the negative consequences of a lack of 
``done-away'' clearing); Letter from Jennifer Han, Executive Vice 
President, Chief Counsel and Head of Global Regulatory Affairs, 
Managed Funds Association to Vanessa Countryman, Apr. 17, 2024, in 
Release No. 34-99844, File No. SR-FICC-2024-007, at 5, available at 
<a href="https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-ficc-2024-007/srficc2024007-461691-1208034.pdf">https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-ficc-2024-007/srficc2024007-461691-1208034.pdf</a> (emphasizing that indirect participants require a robust 
``done-away'' clearing market); Letter from Jiri Krol, Deputy CEO, 
Global Head of Government Affairs, Alternative Investment Management 
Association to Vanessa Countryman, Apr. 23, 2024, in Release No. 34-
99844, File No. SR-FICC-2024-007, at 4, available at <a href="https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-ficc-2024-007/srficc2024007-462091-1209374.pdf">https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-ficc-2024-007/srficc2024007-462091-1209374.pdf</a> (noting that indirect participants need done-away 
clearing to access clearing and settlement services); Letter from 
William Thum, Managing Director and Assistant General Counsel, SIFMA 
Asset Management Group to Vanessa Countryman, May 24, 2024, in 
Release No. 34-99844, File No. SR-FICC-2024-007, at 5, available at 
<a href="https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-ficc-2024-007/srficc2024007-477851-1366734.pdf">https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-ficc-2024-007/srficc2024007-477851-1366734.pdf</a> (noting that FICC must facilitate ``done-away'' trading 
in a manner that fulfills the Access Requirement (as defined 
below)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(i) Background
    FICC established its Sponsoring Member/Sponsored Member service 
(``Sponsored Member Service'') in 2005, allowing certain Netting 
Members (``Sponsoring Members'') to sponsor a Person into a limited 
FICC/GSD membership as a ``Sponsored Member,'' \9\ and submit to FICC 
for comparison, Novation, and netting certain types of eligible 
delivery versus payment (``DVP'') securities transactions (``Sponsored 
DVP Trades''). In 2021, FICC expanded the Sponsored Member Service to 
create the Sponsored GC Service and permit a Sponsoring Member to 
submit for clearing a Repo Transaction between the Sponsoring Member 
and its Sponsored Member (i.e., a ``done-with'' transaction) involving 
securities represented by a Generic CUSIP Number and settled on a 
Sponsored GC Clearing Agent Bank's tri-party repo platform (a 
``Sponsored GC Trade'', and each of a Sponsored DVP Trade and a 
Sponsored GC Trade, a ``Sponsored Member Trade'').\10\ FICC has seen a 
steady increase in the volume of Sponsored GC Trades over the past few 
years.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Rule 3A, Section 3(a), supra note 3.
    \10\ See Rule 3A, Section 7(b), supra note 3.
    \11\ See press release announcing growth in activity cleared 
through the Sponsored Member Service, available at <a href="https://www.dtcc.com/news/2025/march/25/dtccs-ficc-now-live-with-new-treasury-clearing-capabilities">https://www.dtcc.com/news/2025/march/25/dtccs-ficc-now-live-with-new-treasury-clearing-capabilities</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In December 2023, the Commission adopted rules under the Act to 
amend the standards applicable to covered clearing agencies for U.S. 
Treasury securities to require that each covered clearing agency (i) 
have written policies and procedures reasonably designed to require 
that every direct participant of the covered clearing agency submit for 
clearance and settlement all eligible secondary market transactions 
(``ESMTs'') to which it is a counterparty (``Trade Submission 
Requirement''), and (ii) ensure that it has appropriate means to 
facilitate access to clearance and settlement services of all ESMTs, 
including those of indirect participants (``Access Requirement'').\12\ 
In furtherance of the Access Requirement, FICC has adopted new access 
models and margining arrangements and continues to review how it can 
further facilitate access by indirect participants to FICC's clearance 
and settlement services of ESMTs.\13\ FICC has also established 
multiple advisory councils consisting of a broad spectrum of market 
participants and has regularly engaged, both formally and informally, 
with direct and indirect participants to identify what further steps 
FICC can take to facilitate access to central clearing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99149 (Dec. 13, 2023), 
89 FR 2714 (Jan. 16, 2024).
    \13\ To address the Access Requirement, FICC filed a proposed 
rule change to adopt an Agent Clearing Service (``Access Model 
Filing'') and a separate proposed rule change to permit Segregated 
Customer Margin arrangements through which a Sponsoring Member may 
collect margin from a customer and on-post the margin to FICC 
(``Account Segregation Filing''). On November 21, 2024, the 
Commission issued orders approving the Access Model Filing and the 
Account Segregation Filing. See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 
101695 (Nov. 21, 2024), 89 FR 93763 (Nov. 27, 2024) (SR-FICC-2024-
007); and 101694 (Nov. 21, 2024), 89 FR 93784 (Nov. 27, 2024) (SR-
FICC-2024-005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Through this engagement, FICC has received feedback that addressing 
the following considerations would increase the ability of RICs and 
other cash providers to access FICC's clearance and settlement 
services:
    <bullet> RICs, including money market funds that are very active in 
the Treasury repo market, are subject to regulatory restrictions that 
constrain their ability to post cash or securities margin to FICC to 
support their transactions.\14\ As a result, a RIC's Sponsoring Member 
generally must fund such margin obligation in the form of a Clearing 
Fund deposit, which funding increases the cost to the Sponsoring Member 
of clearing the RIC's transactions. In addition, Sponsoring Members are 
generally required to post a haircut to RICs under Sponsored GC Trades 
so as to facilitate the RIC's compliance with its regulatory 
obligations under Rule 5b-3 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 
(``Investment Company Act'').\15\ Market

[[Page 44411]]

participants have described the requirement to post a haircut on top of 
Clearing Fund deposits as ``double margining'' and have noted that such 
double margining serves to limit Sponsoring Members' clearing capacity 
and thus their ability to provide access to RICs and other indirect 
participants.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See, e.g., 15 U.S.C. 80a-17(f). In connection with the 
Trade Submission Requirement, the Commission issued limited five-
year no-action relief providing that, subject to a number of 
conditions, it would not provide a basis for enforcement action 
under Section 17(f) of the Investment Company Act if a RIC's cash 
and/or securities were placed and maintained in the custody of FICC 
for purposes of meeting FICC's margin deposit requirements that may 
be imposed for ESMTs in connection with the RIC's participation in 
the Sponsored Member Service (``Time-Limited RIC No-Action 
Relief''). However, RIC Sponsored Members have informed FICC that 
they are largely unable to meaningfully rely on the Time-Limited RIC 
No-Action Relief to post margin to FICC in light of the five-year 
limitation as well as uncertainties regarding the conditions to this 
relief.
    \15\ 17 CFR 270.5b-3(c)(1)(i) (providing that, in order for a 
repurchase transaction to be ``Collateralized Fully,'' ``[t]he value 
of the securities collateralizing the repurchase agreement (reduced 
by the transaction costs (including loss of interest) that the 
investment company reasonably could expect to incur if the seller 
defaults) is, and during the entire term of the repurchase agreement 
remains, at least equal to the Resale Price provided in the 
agreement''); see also Adam Copeland et al., Repo Intermediation and 
Central Clearing: An Analysis of Sponsored Repo (Fed. Rsrv. Bank of 
N.Y., Staff Rep. No. 1140, Dec. 2024), available at <a href="https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/staff_reports/sr1140.pdf">https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/staff_reports/sr1140.pdf</a> (noting that ``in some trades with money market funds, on 
top of FICC's margin, dealers may be expected to deliver a two 
percent haircut to the money market fund to match prevailing 
practices in tri-party repo.'').
    \16\ See SIFMA, Urgent Action Required: 5 Unresolved Issues in 
Treasury Central Clearing Rules (Dec. 10, 2024), available at 
<a href="https://www.sifma.org/resources/news/blog/urgent-action-required-5-unresolved-issues-in-treasury-central-clearing-rules/">https://www.sifma.org/resources/news/blog/urgent-action-required-5-unresolved-issues-in-treasury-central-clearing-rules/</a> (suggesting 
that the Commission should ``eliminate double margining for 
investment [advisers], as it risks reduced trading and 
liquidity.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    <bullet> Many RICs and other cash providers utilize ``joint trading 
accounts,'' whereby an authorized person of the cash providers, such as 
the cash providers' investment adviser (``Joint Account Agent''), 
executes a single transaction on behalf of multiple cash providers and 
allocates the transaction to the participating cash providers such that 
each participating cash provider participates in the transaction 
relative to its allocated portion of the transaction.\17\ The Rules 
require that, when submitting a Sponsored GC Trade to FICC, a 
Sponsoring Member specify each Sponsored Member that is party to such 
transaction.\18\ However, the time it takes to render the allocation of 
a transaction executed through a joint trading account may be such that 
the final allocation is not performed until after the deadline to 
submit the transaction to FICC has passed. Such timing mismatch can 
effectively preclude the RIC or other cash provider from clearing 
transactions executed through a joint trading account.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See 1996 SIFMA Master Repurchase Agreement, Annex IV, 
Paragraph 4, available at <a href="https://www.sifma.org/documents/master-repurchase-agreement-mra-2/">https://www.sifma.org/documents/master-repurchase-agreement-mra-2/</a>.
    \18\ See Rule 3A, Section 7(b)(ii)(A), supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    <bullet> The Rules require that Funds-Only Settlement Amounts, 
including such amounts due with respect to Sponsored GC Trades, be paid 
or collected twice daily.\19\ FICC understands from its engagement with 
market participants that RICs and other cash providers generally do not 
have the operational capability to pay or collect such amounts with 
such frequency, and that there may be regulatory considerations under 
Section 17(f) of the Investment Company Act or other regulatory regimes 
that may limit the ability of certain Sponsoring Members to collect or 
hold Funds-Only Settlement Amounts for RICs or other cash 
providers.\20\ Therefore, Sponsoring Members typically agree to assume 
a Sponsored Member's Funds-Only Settlement Amount obligations, and to 
receive a Sponsored Member's Funds-Only Settlement Amount entitlements, 
under Sponsored GC Trades.\21\ However, this practice can be costly or 
infeasible and introduce questions under regulatory capital 
requirements if adopted on a greater scale, particularly in the case of 
term transactions or done-away transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See Schedule of Timeframes, supra note 3.
    \20\ See, e.g., 15 U.S.C. 80a-17(f); Letter from Ken Bentsen, 
supra note 5.
    \21\ See 2024 SIFMA Master Treasury Securities Clearing 
Agreement: Done-with, Module II, Section 5 (``. . . Customer and 
Clearing Member agree that (a) Clearing Member shall satisfy any 
obligation of Customer to FICC to pay any Funds-Only Settlement 
Amount in respect of the Customer Sponsored GC Trades; and (b) in 
consideration of the agreement of Clearing Member not to seek 
reimbursement of such amount described in clause (a) from Customer, 
Clearing Member shall be entitled to any Funds-Only Settlement 
Amount in respect of the Customer Sponsored GC Trades due to 
Customer from FICC.''), available at <a href="https://www.sifma.org/resources/general/treasury-clearing-documentation/">https://www.sifma.org/resources/general/treasury-clearing-documentation/</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    <bullet> Currently, a Sponsoring Member may submit to FICC for 
clearing a ``done-away'' Sponsored DVP Trade. However, FICC does not 
currently clear any ``done-away'' transactions under the Sponsored GC 
Service. Market participants have expressed interest in being able to 
clear a ``done-away'' Sponsored GC Trade (i.e., a Sponsored GC Trade 
between the Sponsored Member and either a Netting Member other than the 
Sponsoring Member or another Indirect Participant of any Netting 
Member), so as to increase a Sponsored Member's potential 
counterparties and limit the costs and time associated with documenting 
clearing arrangements with all potential counterparties.
    In light of the feedback and to further support its compliance with 
the Access Requirement, FICC proposes to create the CIL Service that 
would aim to eliminate ``double margining,'' accommodate transactions 
executed through a joint trading account, eliminate Funds-Only 
Settlement Amount obligations for Sponsored GC CIL Trades, and 
accommodate both done-with and done-away trading. FICC is also 
proposing to expand the Sponsored GC Service to allow a Sponsoring 
Member to submit for clearing done-away Sponsored GC Trades. FICC 
believes that these changes would facilitate the ability of RICs as 
well as other cash providers to access FICC's clearance and settlement 
services and to improve the ability of Netting Members to submit 
transactions to FICC for clearing.
(ii) The CIL Service
    The proposed CIL Service would leverage much of the legal and 
operational framework applicable to the existing Sponsored GC Service, 
including the process for trade submission, the use of Generic CUSIP 
Numbers, and the process for settling the transactions through the tri-
party platform of the Sponsored GC Clearing Agent Bank. Accordingly, 
the Rules, as proposed to be amended, would generally treat Sponsored 
GC CIL Trades as Sponsored GC Trades, with limited exceptions designed 
to address the considerations discussed above.
(A) Sponsored GC CIL Trades and Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Account
1. Overview
    FICC proposes to amend the Rules to establish a new type of 
transaction, called a ``Sponsored GC CIL Trade.'' A Sponsored GC CIL 
Trade would be a Sponsored GC Trade entered into by a Sponsored 
Member,\22\ acting as a CIL Funds Lender, and (i) the Sponsored 
Member's own Sponsoring Member (i.e., ``done-with'') or (ii) either a 
Netting Member other than the Sponsoring Member or another Indirect 
Participant of any Netting Member (i.e., ``done-away''). FICC proposes 
for such Sponsored GC CIL Trades to be recorded in a new type of 
Indirect Participants Account, called a ``Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus 
Account.'' The reason FICC is proposing for Sponsored GC CIL Trades to 
be recorded in a separate Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Account separate 
from the general Sponsoring Member Omnibus Account is that the margin 
requirements for Sponsored GC CIL Trades would be calculated 
differently from those for general Sponsored Member Trades. In 
addition, since one of the principal purposes of the CIL Service is to 
address the inability of CIL Funds Lenders to post margin, and the

[[Page 44412]]

margin for Segregated Indirect Participants Accounts must generally 
consist of Indirect Participant assets, the Rules would not permit a 
Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Account to be a Segregated Indirect 
Participants Account.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ Although certain features of the CIL Service are 
specifically designed to address considerations related to the 
Investment Company Act, any Sponsored Member would be permitted to 
be a CIL Funds Lender, and FICC anticipates that cash providers that 
are not RICs may seek to participate in the service (e.g., if they 
are participants in joint trading accounts).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Summary of Proposed Rule Changes
    To effectuate the proposed changes described above, FICC proposes 
to make the following amendments to its Rules.
    New Defined Terms. FICC would revise Rule 1 to add the following 
new defined terms: (1) CIL Funds Lender, (2) Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus 
Account, and (3) Sponsored GC CIL Trade.
    CIL Funds Lender would mean a Sponsored Member that is a GC Funds 
Lender in respect of a Sponsored GC CIL Trade.
    Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Account would mean an Account maintained 
by FICC for a Sponsoring Member to record Sponsored GC CIL Trades 
submitted to FICC by the Sponsoring Member on behalf of its Sponsored 
Members.
    Sponsored GC CIL Trade would mean a Sponsored GC Trade between a 
Sponsored Member, acting as GC Funds Lender, and a Netting Member 
(which may be either its Sponsoring Member or another Netting Member) 
or another Indirect Participant of any Netting Member that the 
Sponsoring Member submits for recordation in a Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus 
Account.
    Revisions to Defined Terms. In addition, FICC would make conforming 
revisions to the following existing defined terms in Rule 1: (1) 
Indirect Participants Account, (2) Sponsoring Member Omnibus Account, 
and (3) Type of Account, each as described in greater detail below.
    FICC proposes to revise the definition of Indirect Participants 
Account to include a Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Account.
    FICC proposes to revise the definition of Sponsoring Member Omnibus 
Account to make clear that Sponsored GC CIL Trades would not be 
recorded in such an Account.
    FICC proposes to revise the definition of Type of Account to 
include a Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Account.
    Establishment of Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Account. FICC proposes to 
revise Sections 2 and 3 of Rule 2B to provide for the establishment of 
a Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Account as an additional type of Indirect 
Participants Account and to make conforming changes. In particular, 
FICC proposes to amend Section 2 of Rule 2B to add a new clause (iii) 
providing that if a Netting Member is a Sponsoring Member, FICC may 
establish and maintain for the Netting Member a Sponsored GC CIL 
Omnibus Account for purposes of recording Sponsored GC CIL Trades of 
the Sponsoring Member's Sponsored Members. In addition, FICC proposes 
to amend Sections 2(i) and 3 of Rule 2B to make clear that a Sponsoring 
Member Omnibus Account would not have Sponsored GC CIL Trades recorded 
in it and that a Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Account may not be a 
Segregated Indirect Participants Account.
    Other conforming changes. FICC proposes to revise Section 8(d) of 
Rule 3A, which concerns netting offsetting settlement obligations for 
purposes of calculating a Sponsoring Member's Individual Total Amount, 
to provide for such provision to apply to Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus 
Accounts to the same extent as it applies to Sponsoring Member Omnibus 
Accounts. FICC also proposes to revise Sections 10(a) and 10(b) of Rule 
3A, which concern Sponsoring Members' Clearing Fund requirements, to 
provide for such provisions to apply to Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus 
Accounts, as applicable.
(B) Risk and Default Management
1. Overview
    To address the ``double margining'' impediment to clearing, FICC 
proposes to require each CIL Funds Lender to collect a haircut and to 
grant FICC a lien on the Purchased GC Repo Securities subject to the 
Sponsored GC CIL Trade. The lien would be documented in a ``CIL 
Custodial Agreement Supplement'' between a Sponsored GC Clearing Agent 
Bank, a CIL Funds Lender, FICC, and the GC Funds Borrower. The Rules 
would require that each CIL Custodial Agreement Supplement include, at 
a minimum, the terms set forth in the Rules and no terms inconsistent 
with such terms. The CIL Custodial Agreement Supplement would 
supplement the existing custodial undertaking or similar agreement 
(``Custody Agreement'') governing the account in which the Sponsored GC 
Clearing Agent Bank maintains the Purchased GC Repo Securities for the 
CIL Funds Lender (``Buyer's GC CIL Trade Account''). While each pairing 
of CIL Funds Lender and GC Funds Borrower would be required to enter 
into a CIL Custodial Agreement Supplement with FICC and the Sponsored 
GC Clearing Agent Bank, FICC plans to work with Sponsored GC Clearing 
Agent Banks to develop a streamlined documentation arrangement. Under 
this arrangement, an individual participant would be able to execute a 
single adherence document that would have the effect of causing the 
participant to adhere simultaneously to CIL Custodial Agreement 
Supplements in relation to all or a portion of their existing Custody 
Agreements. This is similar to approaches that industry associations 
have used to allow parties to amend a number of documents 
simultaneously.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ See ISDA Protocols, available at <a href="https://www.isda.org/protocols/">https://www.isda.org/protocols/</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The purpose of the lien would be to allow FICC to acquire the 
Purchased GC Repo Securities and use them to settle with the GC Funds 
Borrower in the event FICC ceases to act for the CIL Funds Lender or 
its Sponsoring Member. In order to facilitate the foregoing, FICC 
proposes to amend the Rules to provide that if FICC ceases to act for a 
CIL Funds Lender, FICC may, in lieu of closing out the Sponsored GC CIL 
Trades (or a portion of any such trades), exercise its right as a 
secured party in relation to the Purchased GC Repo Securities and 
instruct the Sponsored GC Clearing Agent Bank to remove such Purchased 
GC Repo Securities from the account of such CIL Funds Lender. Under the 
Rules, FICC would only be permitted to instruct the Sponsored GC 
Clearing Agent Bank to remove the Purchased GC Repo Securities from the 
account of the CIL Funds Lender in two scenarios. First, FICC would be 
able to remove such securities if such removal is against cash in an 
amount equal to the amount payable to the CIL Funds Lender (i.e., 
against the repurchase price due back to the CIL Funds Lender in final 
settlement of the Sponsored GC CIL Trade). Second, FICC would be able 
to remove the amount of Purchased GC Repo Securities necessary to 
satisfy the CIL Funds Lender's obligation to return excess Purchased GC 
Repo Securities or to return Purchased GC Repo Securities for which the 
GC Funds Borrower has exercised its right to make a substitution. The 
reason for this instruction right is that the GC Funds Borrower would, 
as is currently the case under the Sponsored GC Service, generally be 
entitled to the return of, and the CIL Funds Lender would be required 
to deliver, Purchased GC Repo Securities that have a market value 
greater than the value of the Purchased GC Repo Securities when the 
Sponsored GC CIL Trade was first entered into (the ``GC Start Leg 
Market Value''). Such excess would generally arise due to an increase 
in the market value of the Purchased GC Repo Securities since the 
Sponsored GC CIL Trade was executed. In addition, the GC Funds Borrower 
would be entitled to effectuate, and a

[[Page 44413]]

CIL Funds Lender would be required to process, a substitution for some 
or all of the Purchased GC Repo Securities of the same Generic CUSIP 
Number. In order to ensure that FICC is able to perform its obligations 
to the GC Funds Borrower in relation to excess Purchased GC Repo 
Securities and substitutions, the Rules would permit FICC to instruct 
the Sponsored GC Clearing Agent Bank to remove the ``Margin Excess 
Amount.'' The Rules would define ``Margin Excess Amount'' as, in 
respect of a Sponsored GC Trade, the amount of Purchased GC Repo 
Securities necessary to (i) cause the market value of the GC Funds 
Lender's GC Collateral Return Obligation to be no greater than the GC 
Start Leg Market Value or (ii) effectuate any permitted substitution of 
Purchased GC Repo Securities, in each case pursuant to Section 8(b) of 
Rule 3A.
    So as to ensure that the Sponsored GC Clearing Agent Bank acts on 
such instructions and to perfect FICC's security interest in the 
Purchased GC Repo Securities, the CIL Custodial Agreement Supplement 
would contain an agreement by the Sponsored GC Clearing Agent Bank to 
comply with FICC's instructions except following delivery by the CIL 
Funds Lender to the Sponsored GC Clearing Agent Bank of a notice of a 
Corporation Default (a ``GC CIL Notice of Default''). The reason the 
Sponsored GC Clearing Agent Bank would agree not to act on FICC's 
instructions following the delivery by the CIL Funds Lender of a CIL GC 
Notice of Default is to ensure that, consistent with market practice 
and the requirements of Investment Company Act Rule 5b-3, the CIL Funds 
Lender would be able to exercise remedies against the Purchased GC Repo 
Securities promptly upon a Corporation Default without potential 
competing instructions from FICC.\24\ In addition, the CIL Custodial 
Agreement Supplement would provide that the CIL Funds Lender, FICC and 
the GC Funds Borrower all agree that the Sponsored GC Clearing Agent 
Bank would, until the CIL Funds Lender has delivered a GC CIL Notice of 
Default to the Sponsored GC Clearing Agent Bank, act upon FICC's 
instructions to transfer Purchased GC Repo Securities from the Buyer's 
GC CIL Trade Account to an account specified in such instruction (i) in 
an amount no greater than the Margin Excess Amount or (ii) against cash 
in an amount equal to the amount payable to the CIL Funds Lender at 
such time. By virtue of these provisions, FICC would effectively be 
able to settle a Sponsored GC CIL Trade by (i) acquiring the Purchased 
GC Repo Securities it needs to deliver to the GC Funds Borrower on the 
Sponsored GC CIL Trade and (ii) transferring to the CIL Funds Lender 
the cash due to it (including the purchase price and accrued price 
differentials) under the Sponsored GC CIL Trade.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ See 17 CFR 270.5b-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The ability of FICC to acquire the Purchased GC Repo Securities and 
use them to settle with the GC Funds Borrower would, except in limited 
circumstances discussed below, eliminate the need for FICC to collect 
margin in relation to the CIL Funds Lender's obligations under the 
Sponsored GC CIL Trade. In the context of a reverse repurchase 
transaction (``reverse repo''), FICC collects margin to ensure that it 
has sufficient resources in the event it ceases to act for the reverse 
repo buyer or its Sponsoring Member, to purchase the relevant 
securities and deliver them to the non-defaulting pre-Novation 
counterparty. However, if FICC can acquire the securities without 
taking market action by virtue of a lien on such securities, it would 
not need margin to secure the CIL Funds Lender's obligations.
    In light of FICC's lien and its right to instruct the Sponsored GC 
Clearing Agent Bank in relation to the Purchased GC Repo Securities, 
FICC would generally be able to settle with the GC Funds Borrower and 
CIL Funds Lender even if FICC ceased to act for the CIL Funds Lender's 
Sponsoring Member. In such a situation, FICC would simply give the 
instruction to the Sponsored GC Clearing Agent Bank to complete 
settlement or allow the CIL Funds Lender to do so.
    Nonetheless, a default of the Sponsoring Member could prevent FICC 
from effectuating such settlement, if the GC Funds Borrower on the 
Sponsored GC CIL Trade is the defaulting Sponsoring Member or an 
Indirect Participant of that Sponsoring Member or its Affiliate. In 
such default scenario, FICC may not be able to settle the Sponsored GC 
CIL Trade at all. For example, if the GC Funds Borrower is an Indirect 
Participant of the defaulting Sponsoring Member and the Sponsoring 
Member's trustee or bankruptcy receiver refuses to perform its 
obligation as processing agent for such Indirect Participant to 
complete settlement, FICC would not be able to settle. In other cases, 
FICC may be able to complete full or partial settlement notwithstanding 
the fact that it has ceased to act for the Sponsoring Member. For 
instance, if the Sponsoring Member were the GC Funds Borrower but 
entered into a back-to-back FICC-cleared transaction involving some or 
all of the Purchased GC Repo Securities with a Netting Member or an 
Indirect Participant of a third party Netting Member, the Sponsoring 
Member's obligations would net out under Rule 22A, and FICC would be 
able to complete settlement with the Sponsoring Member's pre-Novation 
counterparty on the back-to-back transaction.
    To address these possibilities, FICC proposes to provide that, if 
FICC ceases to act for the Sponsoring Member, and the GC Funds Borrower 
is the defaulting Sponsoring Member or one of its Indirect 
Participants, FICC may, as an alternative to effectuating settlement or 
exercising rights under its lien, terminate the Sponsored GC CIL Trade 
(or portion thereof). In such situation, the CIL Funds Lender would be 
permitted to take such market action in relation to the relevant 
Purchased GC Repo Securities as it determines in its discretion. In 
furtherance of the foregoing, the CIL Custodial Agreement Supplement 
would permit the CIL Funds Lender to instruct the Sponsored GC Clearing 
Agent Bank in relation to any Purchased GC Repo Securities that FICC 
has informed the Sponsored GC Clearing Agent Bank FICC does not intend 
to use to complete settlement with the relevant GC Funds Borrower.
    Were FICC to terminate a Sponsored GC CIL Trade (or a portion 
thereof), FICC would calculate a liquidation amount owing in respect 
thereof to Rule 22A. If the liquidation amount is owed by the CIL Funds 
Lender to FICC, FICC would require resources to ensure the CIL Funds 
Lender can satisfy its obligation to pay such amount. To the extent the 
Sponsoring Member posted Clearing Fund to secure the obligations of the 
GC Funds Borrower, that Clearing Fund could serve as such resources. 
Accordingly, FICC proposes to amend the Rules to allow it to look to 
such Clearing Fund deposits to address a CIL Funds Lender's obligations 
in the event FICC closes out the Sponsored GC CIL Trades. However, if 
the GC Funds Borrower is an Indirect Participant that has posted 
Segregated Customer Margin, such margin would only be available to 
cover the GC Funds Borrower's obligations and could not be used to 
address the obligations of a CIL Funds Lender. FICC would therefore 
require other resources to cover such liquidation amount.
    FICC proposes to address such need for additional resources in two 
ways. First, FICC proposes to require that a Sponsored GC CIL Trade 
have an Initial Haircut no less than 2 percent of the Contract Value of 
the Start Leg or such other amount determined by FICC (``CIL Required 
Haircut''). This requirement

[[Page 44414]]

would be broadly consistent with the market practice of how uncleared 
triparty repos of RICs are overcollateralized today.\25\ FICC would 
provide Netting Members with at least 30 Business Days' advance notice 
of any changes to the CIL Required Haircut. A change to the CIL 
Required Haircut may be driven by, for example, a shift in market 
practice related to initial haircuts to require a higher initial 
haircut to address the requirement within the Investment Company Act 
Rule 5b-3 that Sponsored GC CIL Trades be ``Collateralized Fully''.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ See supra note 15.
    \26\ 17 CFR 270.5b-3(a) (stating that ``the acquisition of a 
repurchase agreement may be deemed to be an acquisition of the 
underlying securities, provided the obligation of the seller to 
repurchase the securities from the investment company is 
Collateralized Fully''); 17 CFR 270.5b-3(c)(1) (defining 
``Collateralized Fully'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Second, FICC proposes to subject the CIL Funds Lender's Sponsoring 
Member to a Clearing Fund requirement for a Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus 
Account (``Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Account Required Fund Deposit'') in 
circumstances when such is necessary to ensure that FICC would have 
resources, in the form of Clearing Fund deposits or Purchased GC Repo 
Securities, no less than the Clearing Fund FICC would otherwise collect 
in relation to the transaction. More specifically, FICC would calculate 
a Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Account Required Fund Deposit if (and only 
if) (1) the Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Account has been enabled to record 
Sponsored GC CIL Trades for which the GC Funds Borrower is its 
Sponsoring Member or a Segregated Indirect Participant of its 
Sponsoring Member; and (2) that Sponsoring Member or its Affiliate has 
a Segregated Indirect Participants Account. As noted above, only in 
that situation would FICC not have clearly available alternative 
resources (in the form of other Clearing Fund deposits and Purchased GC 
Repo Securities) to cover the obligations of a CIL Funds Lender. In all 
other situations, the Sponsoring Member would not be required to post 
any Clearing Fund in relation to a Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Account.
    The Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Account Required Fund Deposit would be 
the greater of a $1 million minimum and the sum of all applicable 
charges, which would include a VaR Charge, a Portfolio Differential 
Charge, and other applicable charges.\27\ The VaR Charge would be 
calculated for each CIL Funds Lender as the positive difference between 
(1) the amount of VaR Charge that FICC would have collected if the 
Sponsored GC CIL Trades of that CIL Funds Lender had been subject to 
the calculation of a Sponsoring Member Omnibus Account Required Fund 
Deposit, and (2) the aggregate of all CIL Required Haircuts on that CIL 
Funds Lender's Sponsored GC CIL Trades.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ The Portfolio Differential Charge addresses the variability 
of clearing activity submitted to GSD throughout the day by 
measuring the period-over-period increase in the VaR Charge of 
Members. The additional charges that may be included in a Sponsored 
GC CIL Omnibus Account Required Fund Deposit when applicable would 
include a Backtesting Charge, Holiday Charge, Margin Liquidity 
Adjustment Charge and Intraday Supplemental Deposit. The calculation 
of each of these additional charges would be the same as when 
calculated with respect to a Sponsoring Member Omnibus Account.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FICC's security interest in Purchased GC Repo Securities subject to 
Sponsored GC CIL Trades would also generally remove the need for the 
Sponsoring Member to guarantee to FICC the performance by the CIL Funds 
Lender of its obligations under the Sponsored GC CIL Trades, since 
FICC's lien generally would allow it to obtain the Purchased GC Repo 
Securities and perform to the GC Funds Borrower. Accordingly, FICC 
proposes to amend the Rules to provide that, notwithstanding anything 
to the contrary set forth in any Sponsoring Member Guaranty, the 
Sponsoring Member does not guarantee to FICC and, except as expressly 
set forth in the Rules, shall not be responsible for, the obligations 
of a Sponsored Member arising under any Sponsored GC CIL Trade for 
which the Sponsored Member is the CIL Funds Lender.
    Because FICC would generally anticipate addressing a CIL Funds 
Lender default by utilizing the lien to settle with the GC Funds 
Borrower, FICC proposes to amend Section 16 of Rule 3A, which generally 
allows a Sponsoring Member to liquidate a done-with Sponsored Member 
Trade, to provide that a Sponsoring Member may only trigger that 
provision if FICC has not exercised its rights as a secured party. In 
addition, although as mentioned above, FICC would not generally require 
a Sponsoring Member to guarantee the obligations of a CIL Funds Lender, 
Section 16 of Rule 3A generally depends on the Sponsoring Member being 
responsible for the obligations of the Sponsored Member. Accordingly, 
FICC is proposing to amend the Rules to provide that, in the event that 
the Sponsoring Member did exercise its rights under Section 16 of Rule 
3A to terminate any done-with Sponsored GC CIL Trades, the Sponsoring 
Member would be responsible for any Sponsored Member Liquidation Amount 
owed by the CIL Funds Lender.
    In addition to perfecting FICC's security interest in the Purchased 
GC Repo Securities and allowing FICC to give instructions so as to 
complete settlement with the GC Funds Borrower, the CIL Custodial 
Agreement Supplement would include a number of terms to facilitate the 
ability of RICs to conclude that Sponsored GC CIL Trades are 
``Collateralized Fully'' within the meaning of Investment Company Act 
Rule 5b-3.\28\ In particular, the CIL Custodial Agreement Supplement 
would make clear that the Buyer's GC CIL Trade Account is a ``deposit 
account'' \29\ in relation to cash and a ``securities account'' \30\ in 
relation to securities and other financial assets, and include 
acknowledgments from all relevant parties that the CIL Funds Lender is 
the ``entitlement holder'' \31\ of each Buyer's GC CIL Trade Account 
constituting a securities account, and each financial asset credited 
thereto, and the ``bank's customer'' \32\ of each Buyer's GC CIL Trade 
Account constituting a ``deposit account,'' \33\ as such terms are used 
in the New York Uniform Commercial Code (``UCC''). Accordingly, the CIL 
Funds Lender would have ``control'' of each such account and all 
security entitlements, securities, financial assets, or cash credited 
thereto pursuant to UCC Section 8-106(d)(1) and UCC Section 9-
104(a)(3), as applicable.\34\ Under the UCC, control serves to perfect 
a security interest in a securities account or deposit account and all 
assets credited thereto.\35\ In addition, the CIL Custodian

[[Page 44415]]

Agreement Supplement would provide the CIL Funds Lender with the 
ability to take exclusive control of the Buyer's GC CIL Trade Account 
and issue instructions to the Sponsored GC Clearing Agent Bank with 
respect to such account upon delivery to the Sponsored GC Clearing 
Agent Bank of a CIL GC Notice of Default.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ See 17 CFR 270.5b-3(a), supra note 26.
    \29\ See UCC 9-102(a)(29) (defining ``deposit account'' to mean 
``a demand, time, savings, passbook, or similar account maintained 
with a bank'').
    \30\ See UCC 8-501(a) (defining ``securities account'' to mean 
``an account to which a financial asset is or may be credited in 
accordance with an agreement under which the person maintaining the 
account undertakes to treat the person for whom the account is 
maintained as entitled to exercise the rights that comprise the 
financial asset'').
    \31\ See UCC 8-102(a)(7) (defining an ``entitlement holder'' to 
mean ``a person identified in the records of a securities 
intermediary as the person having a security entitlement against the 
securities intermediary'').
    \32\ See UCC 9-104(a)(3) (providing that a secured party has 
control of a deposit account if ``the secured party becomes the 
bank's customer with respect to the deposit account'').
    \33\ See UCC 9-102(a)(29), supra note 29.
    \34\ See UCC 8-106(d)(1) (providing that a purchaser has 
``control'' of a security entitlement if ``the purchaser becomes the 
entitlement holder''); UCC 9-104(a)(3) (providing that a secured 
party has control of a deposit account if ``the secured party 
becomes the bank's customer with respect to the deposit account'').
    \35\ See UCC 9-314(a) (providing that a security interest in 
investment property and deposit accounts ``may be perfected by 
control of the collateral'').
    \36\ See 17 CFR 270.5b-3(c)(1)(v) (requiring that ``[u]pon an 
Event of Insolvency with respect to the seller, the repurchase 
agreement would qualify under a provision of applicable insolvency 
law providing an exclusion from any automatic stay of creditors' 
rights against the seller'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FICC is also proposing in the Rules certain terms that it 
understands from RICs are important to facilitate a conclusion that the 
Sponsored GC CIL Trades are ``Collateralized Fully.'' Specifically FICC 
is proposing to provide in the Rules that, although each Sponsored GC 
CIL Trade is a sale and purchase and not a loan, in the event any such 
transaction is deemed to be a loan, FICC pledges to the relevant CIL 
Funds Lender as security for the performance by FICC of its obligations 
under such Sponsored GC CIL Trade, and grants such CIL Funds Lender a 
security interest in, all of FICC's rights, title and interest in and 
to the securities, financial assets and cash delivered to the CIL Funds 
Lender pursuant to such Sponsored GC CIL Trade and from time to time 
credited to the Buyer's GC CIL Trade Account, together with all 
proceeds of the foregoing.
    The proposed CIL Service would not present any additional or new 
liquidity risks to FICC. FICC would incorporate Sponsored GC CIL Trades 
into its liquidity risk management calculations and into the 
calculation of Sponsoring Members' obligations with respect to the 
Capped Contingency Liquidity Facility (``CCLF''), as set forth in 
Section 2a(b) of Rule 22A, using the same methodology, logic and 
parameters that FICC uses with respect to Sponsored GC Trades.
2. Summary of Proposed Rule Changes
    To effectuate the proposed changes described above, FICC proposes 
to make the following amendments to its Rules.
    New defined terms. FICC would revise Rule 1 to add the following 
new defined terms: (1) CIL Custodial Agreement Supplement, (2) CIL 
Required Haircut, (3) Margin Excess Amount, and (4) Sponsored GC CIL 
Omnibus Account Required Fund Deposit.
    CIL Custodial Agreement Supplement would mean an agreement between 
a Sponsored GC Clearing Agent Bank, a CIL Funds Lender, FICC and a GC 
Funds Borrower that includes, at a minimum, the required terms set 
forth in a Schedule of Material Terms to the CIL Custodial Agreement 
Supplement, to be included in the Rules, and nothing inconsistent with 
those terms.
    The CIL Custodial Agreement Supplement would be part of the 
agreement (often titled a ``Custodial Undertaking'') between the CIL 
Funds Lender, the GC Funds Borrower, and the Sponsored GC Clearing 
Agent Bank that governs the establishment of the accounts of the CIL 
Funds Lender and the GC Funds Borrower at the Sponsored GC Clearing 
Agent Bank, the processes for effecting transfers of cash or securities 
to or from such accounts, and the rights of the applicable parties 
relating to such accounts.
    CIL Required Haircut would mean no less than 2 percent of the 
Contract Value of the Start Leg or such other amount as FICC may, with 
no less than thirty (30) Business Days' advance notice, make available 
to Netting Members in an Important Notice (or such other form as FICC 
may determine) and communicate to the Sponsored GC Clearing Agent Bank.
    Margin Excess Amount would mean, in respect of a Sponsored GC 
Trade, the amount of Purchased GC Repo Securities necessary to (i) 
cause the market value of the GC Funds Lender's GC Collateral Return 
Obligation to be no greater than the GC Start Leg Market Value or (ii) 
effectuate any permitted substitution of Purchased GC Repo Securities, 
in each case pursuant to Section 8(b) of Rule 3A.
    Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Account Required Fund Deposit would mean 
the Sponsoring Member's Required Fund Deposit Portion that is 
calculated on the basis of the Sponsoring Member's Sponsored GC CIL 
Omnibus Account(s).
    Revisions to defined terms. FICC proposes to revise the definition 
of Required Fund Deposit Portion to mean each item listed in Section 
2(a)(i)-(v) of Rule 4, as a conforming change in light of the addition 
of a new clause (v) in Section 2(a) of Rule 4 as described below.
    The definition of VaR Charge, set forth in Section 5 of the Margin 
Component Schedule, would be revised to provide that, with respect to 
each CIL Funds Lender, such charge would be calculated as the positive 
difference between (1) the amount of VaR Charge that FICC would have 
collected if the Sponsored GC CIL Trades of that CIL Funds Lender had 
been subject to the calculation of a Sponsoring Member Omnibus Account 
Required Fund Deposit, and (2) the aggregate of all CIL Required 
Haircuts on that CIL Funds Lender's Sponsored GC CIL Trades.
    Other Amendments. FICC proposes the following additional 
amendments.
    FICC proposes to amend the last paragraph of Section 1 of Rule 3A 
to provide that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in 
any Sponsoring Member Guaranty, the Sponsoring Member does not 
guarantee to FICC, and, except as expressly set forth in the Rules, 
shall not be responsible for, the obligations of a Sponsored Member 
arising under any Sponsored GC CIL Trade for which the Sponsored Member 
is the CIL Funds Lender.
    FICC proposes to revise Section 7(b)(i) of Rule 3A to specify that 
Sponsored GC CIL Trades must have an Initial Haircut no less than the 
CIL Required Haircut, and further provide that no modification to the 
CIL Required Haircut (as provided for in the definition of the CIL 
Required Haircut) would apply to Sponsored GC CIL Trades that have been 
Novated to FICC prior to the effectiveness of such modification.
    FICC proposes to add a new Section 7(b)(v) to Rule 3A to provide 
that, although FICC and each CIL Funds Lender intend that each 
Sponsored GC CIL Trade be a sale and purchase and not a loan, in the 
event any such transaction is deemed to be a loan, FICC pledges to the 
relevant CIL Funds Lender as security for the performance by FICC of 
its obligations under such Sponsored GC CIL Trade, and grants such CIL 
Funds Lender a security interest in, all of FICC's rights, title and 
interest in and to the securities, financial assets and cash delivered 
to the CIL Funds Lender pursuant to such Sponsored GC CIL Trade and 
from time to time credited to the Buyer's GC CIL Trade Account, 
together with all proceeds of the foregoing.
    FICC proposes to revise Section 10(c) of Rule 3A to provide that 
Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Account Required Fund Deposit with respect to 
obligations of a Sponsoring Member arising under Sponsored GC CIL 
Trades would be subject to the same requirements as Sponsoring Member 
Omnibus Account Required Fund Deposit, if applicable. The revised 
Section 10(c) would also provide that a Netting Member's Actual Deposit 
would secure (1) the Netting Member's obligation to provide Sponsored 
GC CIL Omnibus Account Required Fund Deposit, if applicable, and (2) 
the obligations of the CIL Funds Lender under each Sponsored GC CIL 
Trade for which the Netting Member acts as Sponsoring Member.
    FICC proposes to revise Section 10(e) of Rule 3A to provide that, 
consistent

[[Page 44416]]

with the existing provision under Rule 3A that prohibits Sponsoring 
Members from engaging in cross-margining with respect to Sponsoring 
Member Omnibus Accounts, a Sponsoring Member would not be eligible to 
participate in any Cross-Margining Arrangements with respect to any 
Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Account.
    FICC proposes to revise Section 10(f) of Rule 3A to provide that, 
unlike for other Sponsored GC Trades, for purposes of the application 
of Rule 4 and the Margin Component Schedule to a Sponsoring Member 
Omnibus Account, Sponsored GC CIL Trades would not be treated as GCF 
Repo Transactions.
    FICC proposes to add a new Section 10(g) to Rule 3A to provide 
that, to secure the full and timely performance of its obligations to 
FICC in connection with each Sponsored GC CIL Trade, each CIL Funds 
Lender would be required to execute a CIL Custodial Agreement 
Supplement wherein it pledges and grants to FICC, and agrees that FICC 
shall have, a continuing lien on and security interest in, all of such 
CIL Funds Lender's rights, title and interest in and to all Purchased 
GC Repo Securities subject to each outstanding Sponsored GC CIL Trade.
    FICC proposes to revise Section 13 of Rule 3A to add a new Section 
13(d) to provide that, if FICC ceases to act for a CIL Funds Lender, 
FICC may, in lieu of applying the provisions of Rule 22A in relation to 
one or more Sponsored GC CIL Trades (or a portion of any such trade), 
exercise its rights as a secured party in relation to some or all of 
the Purchased GC Repo Securities in respect of the Sponsored GC CIL 
Trades of such CIL Funds Lender and, in connection therewith, instruct 
the Sponsored GC Clearing Agent Bank to remove such Purchased GC Repo 
Securities from the account of such CIL Funds Lender (x) in an amount 
no greater than the Margin Excess Amount or (y) in an amount FICC 
determines to be equal to the amount payable to the CIL Funds Lender in 
connection with its GC Collateral Return Obligation corresponding to 
such Purchased GC Repo Securities.
    FICC proposes to amend Section 14(d) of Rule 3A to make clear that 
the provisions of Section 14(e), rather than the last sentence of 
Section 14(d), would specify the actions FICC may take in respect of 
Sponsored GC CIL Trades if FICC ceases to act for a Sponsoring Member.
    FICC proposes to add a new Section 14(e) to Rule 3A that addresses 
the actions FICC may take in respect of Sponsored GC CIL Trades if FICC 
ceases to act for a Sponsoring Member. It would provide that, in such 
situation, FICC may, in its discretion, either (i) transfer such 
Sponsored GC CIL Trades to another Sponsoring Member pursuant to Rule 
26, (ii) settle all or a portion of the GC Collateral Return 
Obligations arising from such Sponsored GC CIL Trades as well as all 
corresponding Margin Excess Amount obligations, (iii) utilize its lien 
to achieve such effective settlement, or (iv) if the GC Funds Borrower 
to such Sponsored GC CIL Trade was the Sponsoring Member or an Indirect 
Participant of such Sponsoring Member, terminate such Sponsored GC CIL 
Trade, in which case Rule 22A would apply in relation to such Sponsored 
GC CIL Trade.
    FICC proposes to revise Section 16 of Rule 3A to provide that the 
Sponsoring Member may utilize the close-out mechanism therein for any 
done-with Sponsored Member Trade (including any done-with Sponsored GC 
Trade and any done-with Sponsored GC CIL Trade) and to add as a 
condition to such utilization in the context of a Sponsored GC CIL 
Trade (or a portion of any such trade) that FICC has not exercised its 
rights set forth in proposed Section 13(e) of Rule 3A, as described 
above.
    FICC proposes to revise Section 2(a) of Rule 4 regarding the 
components of the Required Fund Deposit a Netting Member must make to 
add a new clause (v) consisting of an amount calculated with respect to 
the Netting Member's Margin Portfolios that include one or more 
Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Accounts, when such amount is applicable 
pursuant to the Margin Component Schedule.
    FICC also proposes to amend Section 4(a) of Rule 4 to provide that 
a Netting Member's Clearing Fund deposit and other collateral pledged 
thereunder would secure all obligations and liabilities of the Netting 
Member's Sponsored Members in respect of Sponsored GC CIL Trades in the 
Netting Member's Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Account (if applicable).
    FICC proposes to revise Section 2 of Rule 22A to provide that FICC 
would not close out a Sponsored GC CIL Trade (or a portion thereof) if 
it determines to exercise its right as a secured party in relation to 
the relevant Purchased GC Repo Securities, and that the CIL Funds 
Lender may take market action in relation to the Purchased GC Repo 
Securities in respect of a Sponsored GC CIL Trade (or a portion 
thereof) in its discretion if FICC determines to terminate the 
Sponsored GC CIL Trade (or such portion).
    FICC proposes to revise Section 2 of the Margin Component Schedule 
to add a new subsection (c) that describes when a Sponsored GC CIL 
Omnibus Account Required Fund Deposit may be calculated with respect to 
a Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Account and the components of that 
calculation. This subsection would provide that a Sponsored GC CIL 
Omnibus Account Required Fund Deposit would only be calculated if (1) 
the Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Account has been enabled to record 
Sponsored GC CIL Trades for which the GC Funds Borrower is its 
Sponsoring Member or a Segregated Indirect Participant of its 
Sponsoring Member; and (2) that Sponsoring Member or its Affiliate has 
a Segregated Indirect Participants Account.
    FICC proposes to also provide in the new Section 2(c) of the Margin 
Component Schedule that, on each Business Day, FICC would determine the 
Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Account Required Fund Deposit, for each Margin 
Portfolio that includes one or more Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Accounts, 
as an Unadjusted GSD Margin Portfolio Amount equal to the sum of (i) 
the VaR Charge, plus (ii) the Portfolio Differential Charge. This 
proposed section would also provide that the following charges may be 
added to the Unadjusted GSD Margin Portfolio Amount, when applicable: 
(i) Backtesting Charge, (ii) Holiday Charge, (iii) Margin Liquidity 
Adjustment Charge, and (iv) Intraday Supplemental Fund Deposit.
    FICC proposes to amend Section 2(d) (as renumbered) to provide that 
any Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Account Required Fund Deposit that is 
collected would be equal to the greater of (i) the sum of the 
Unadjusted GSD Margin Portfolio Amount and all applicable additional 
charges; and (ii) a minimum charge of $1 million.
    FICC proposes to add a Schedule of CIL Custodial Agreement 
Supplement Material Terms to the Rules, which would set forth the 
minimum terms that would be required to be included in an agreement for 
that agreement to qualify as a CIL Custodial Agreement Supplement 
pursuant to the definition of such term in the Rules. Such minimum 
terms would include: (i) the establishment of Buyer's GC CIL Trade 
Accounts to which all securities transferred pursuant to a Sponsored GC 
CIL Trade and proceeds thereof would be credited; (ii) the creation of 
FICC's lien in each Buyer's GC CIL Trade Account and assets credited 
thereto, and the obligation for the Sponsored GC Clearing Agent Bank to 
comply with FICC's instructions with respect thereto, except following 
a Corporation Default; (iii) the obligation for the Sponsored GC

[[Page 44417]]

Clearing Agent Bank to comply with certain instructions of the CIL 
Funds Lender in connection with the final settlement of a Sponsored GC 
CIL Trade, following FICC's decision to terminate a Sponsored GC CIL 
Trade after the default of the Sponsoring Member, or upon a Corporation 
Default; and (iv) terms to facilitate the ability of CIL Funds Lenders 
that are RICs to conclude that Sponsored GC CIL Trades are 
``Collateralized Fully'' within the meaning of Investment Company Act 
Rule 5b-3, as discussed above.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \37\ 17 CFR 270.5b-3(c)(1)(v) (requiring that ``[u]pon an Event 
of Insolvency with respect to the seller, the repurchase agreement 
would qualify under a provision of applicable insolvency law 
providing an exclusion from any automatic stay of creditors' rights 
against the seller'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(C) CIL Joint Accounts
1. Overview
    FICC understands from its engagement with market participants that 
RICs and other cash providers that have engaged a common investment 
adviser may seek to enter into triparty repo transactions using ``joint 
trading accounts.'' The investment adviser acts as agent for the joint 
trading account in accordance with guidance issued by Commission staff. 
The obligations of the investment adviser and a cash provider in 
relation to the joint trading account are typically set out in an 
agreement between the investment adviser and the cash provider.
    One of the obligations of an investment adviser that acts on behalf 
of a joint trading account is to ``allocate'' transactions entered into 
through the joint trading account to the individual participants. FICC 
understands that such allocation serves to cause the transaction to 
constitute separate individual transactions between the counterparty 
and each participant based on the participant's allocated portion. FICC 
further understands that, prior to such allocation, the transaction 
remains a single transaction, but with each participant having a pro 
rata interest in it and being liable for a pro rata share of the 
obligations. Regardless of whether a transaction has been allocated or 
not, FICC understands that each participant's entitlement to the 
purchased securities in the triparty account corresponds to its portion 
of the relevant transaction.
    To facilitate the ability of CIL Funds Lenders to access FICC's 
clearance and settlement systems in relation to transactions executed 
through a joint trading account, FICC proposes to permit two or more 
CIL Funds Lenders to be represented by an agent (a ``CIL Joint Account 
Agent'') that has been approved by FICC. Each such CIL Funds Lender and 
CIL Joint Account Agent would need to sign and deliver to FICC a ``CIL 
Joint Account Agent Agreement'' in such form as may be prescribed by 
FICC. The CIL Joint Account Agent Agreement would require the CIL Funds 
Lender and CIL Joint Account Agent to represent that their performance 
of their obligations under the CIL Joint Account Agent Agreement and 
the Rules is in compliance with all applicable law. FICC further 
proposes to amend its Rules to permit a Sponsoring Member to submit to 
FICC for Novation a Sponsored GC CIL Trade entered into by a CIL Joint 
Account Agent on behalf of multiple CIL Funds Lenders (each such 
Sponsored GC CIL Trade, a ``CIL Joint Account Block'').
    Each such CIL Funds Lender on whose behalf a CIL Joint Account 
Block has been submitted would only be entitled to, and liable for, its 
respective portion of the rights and obligations arising under or in 
connection with the CIL Joint Account Block. The responsibility to 
calculate such portions as well as to engage in the formal allocation 
would be on the CIL Joint Account Agent in accordance with the terms of 
any investment management or other agreement between the CIL Joint 
Account Agent and the CIL Funds Lender. The Rules would provide that, 
if the CIL Joint Account Agent has performed such allocation, the 
entitlement of each CIL Funds Lender to, and liability of each such CIL 
Funds Lender for, the rights and obligations arising under or in 
connection with such CIL Joint Account Block shall be limited to the 
amount of such CIL Joint Account Block allocated to each such CIL Funds 
Lender. If the CIL Joint Account Agent has not performed such 
allocation, the CIL Funds Lender would be liable for its pro rata 
portion of the transaction.
    FICC proposes to adopt amendments to the Rules that would address 
how FICC would handle the default of a CIL Funds Lender on whose behalf 
a CIL Joint Account Block has been submitted. FICC understands that 
RICs are generally subject to regulatory requirements that limit their 
ability to agree to have their transactions affected as a result of a 
circumstance affecting another firm acting through the same joint 
trading account. FICC therefore proposes to provide in the Rules that, 
in a default of a CIL Funds Lender on whose behalf a CIL Joint Account 
Block has been submitted, FICC would, to the extent it determines doing 
so is feasible and consistent with applicable law, exercise remedies in 
a way that would have no significant adverse impact on the interest of 
any non-defaulting CIL Funds Lender in such CIL Joint Account Block or 
the Purchased GC Repo Securities related thereto.
    If FICC cannot exercise remedies in a way that does not have a 
significant adverse impact on the interest of any non-defaulting CIL 
Funds Lender (e.g., if the CIL Joint Account Block has not been 
allocated), FICC would, to the extent it determines that doing so is 
not prohibited by, and would not prejudice its rights under, applicable 
law and is necessary to preserve the interest of any non-defaulting CIL 
Funds Lenders, refrain from exercising remedies against the CIL Funds 
Lender in relation to such CIL Joint Account Block or Purchased GC Repo 
Securities, including its rights under its security interest in the 
Purchased GC Repo Securities, except to facilitate the movement of any 
Margin Excess Amount or on the maturity date of the CIL Joint Account 
Block, at which point FICC would cause the transfer of the Purchased GC 
Repo Securities against the amount due under the CIL Joint Account 
Block. As discussed above, in relation to a defaulting CIL Funds 
Lender, such exercise would constitute an exercise of remedies as a 
secured party. In relation to any non-defaulting CIL Funds Lender, such 
exercise of remedies would constitute settlement of its portion of the 
CIL Joint Account Block in relation to mark-to-market, substitution, or 
final settlement obligations with respect thereto.
    In order to ensure that FICC knows the respective interests of the 
defaulting and non-defaulting CIL Funds Lenders in a CIL Joint Account 
Block, FICC proposes to require that a CIL Joint Account Agent provide 
FICC with certain information in the event FICC ceases to act for a CIL 
Funds Lender on whose behalf a CIL Joint Account Agent acts. In 
particular, the Rules would provide that, in the event FICC ceases to 
act for a CIL Funds Lender that is a participant in a CIL Joint Account 
Block, the relevant CIL Joint Account Agent must promptly notify FICC 
whether such CIL Joint Account Block had been allocated and, if so, the 
respective allocation to the defaulting CIL Funds Lender. The Rules 
would further provide that the CIL Joint Account Agent would not be 
permitted to change the allocation information with respect to the 
defaulting CIL Funds Lender following such notification. FICC does not 
propose to require the CIL Joint Account Agent to provide allocation 
information outside the context of a default by a CIL Funds Lender 
because, in light of FICC's lien on the Purchased GC Repo Securities

[[Page 44418]]

and instruction right, FICC does not require such information to risk 
manage the Sponsored GC CIL Trade or to effectuate settlement thereof.
2. Summary of Proposed Rule Changes
    To effectuate the proposed changes described above, FICC proposes 
to make the following amendments to its Rules.
    New defined terms. FICC would revise Rule 1 to add the following 
new defined terms: (1) CIL Joint Account, (2) CIL Joint Account Agent, 
(3) CIL Joint Account Agent Agreement, and (4) CIL Joint Account Block.
    CIL Joint Account would mean a group of two or more CIL Funds 
Lenders represented by a CIL Joint Account Agent.
    CIL Joint Account Agent would mean an entity authorized to enter 
into Sponsored GC CIL Trades on behalf of two or more CIL Funds 
Lenders.
    CIL Joint Account Agent Agreement would mean the agreement required 
by new Section 3A of Rule 3A (as described below) to be signed and 
delivered to FICC by each CIL Funds Lender that would be represented by 
a CIL Joint Account Agent and the applicable CIL Joint Account Agent.
    CIL Joint Account Block would mean a Sponsored GC CIL Trade entered 
into by a CIL Joint Account Agent on behalf of multiple CIL Funds 
Lenders.
    Other amendments. FICC proposes to add a new Section 3A to Rule 3A 
to facilitate the ability of CIL Funds Lenders to clear transactions 
executed through joint trading accounts as described above. 
Specifically:
    Paragraph (a) of proposed Section 3A would provide that two or more 
CIL Funds Lenders may be represented by a CIL Joint Account Agent that 
has been approved by FICC subject to each such CIL Funds Lender and 
such CIL Joint Account Agent signing and delivering a CIL Joint Account 
Agent Agreement to FICC in such form as may be prescribed by FICC. If 
FICC terminates the CIL Joint Account Agent Agreement, the CIL Joint 
Account Agent would no longer be permitted to represent the CIL Funds 
Lenders in relation to any new CIL Joint Account Block, except in 
respect of any outstanding CIL Joint Account Block(s) that have been 
Novated. FICC's termination of the CIL Joint Account Agent Agreement 
would not affect such CIL Joint Account Block(s), nor would it affect 
the CIL Joint Account Agent's ability to act on behalf of a CIL Funds 
Lender in another capacity.
    Paragraph (b) of proposed Section 3A would provide that a CIL Joint 
Account Agent may enter into, and a Sponsoring Member may submit to 
FICC for Novation in accordance with Rule 3A, a CIL Joint Account Block 
on behalf of multiple CIL Funds Lenders. Each CIL Funds Lender would be 
entitled to, and responsible for, only the rights and obligations 
associated with the portion of the CIL Joint Account Block allocated to 
it. If any portion of the obligations to FICC remains unallocated, each 
represented CIL Funds Lender would be liable for its pro rata share of 
those unallocated obligations.
    Paragraph (c) of proposed Section 3A would address the exercise of 
remedies in the event FICC ceases to act for a CIL Funds Lender on 
whose behalf a CIL Joint Account Block has been submitted. In such 
event, for each CIL Joint Account Block entered into by a CIL Joint 
Account Agent in respect of a CIL Joint Account in which the defaulted 
CIL Funds Lender is a participant at the time the CIL Joint Account 
Block was entered into, the CIL Joint Account Agent would need to 
promptly notify FICC (A) whether the defaulting CIL Funds Lender was a 
CIL Funds Lender on behalf of which such CIL Joint Account Agent 
entered into such CIL Joint Account Block and (B) for each such CIL 
Joint Account Block, (x) the amount of such CIL Joint Account Block 
that has been allocated to the defaulting CIL Funds Lender or (y) that 
such CIL Joint Account Block was not allocated by the CIL Joint Account 
Agent among the defaulting CIL Funds Lender and the other CIL Funds 
Lenders represented by such CIL Joint Account Agent in the applicable 
CIL Joint Account, in each case as of the time of such notification. 
After such notification, the CIL Joint Account Agent would not be 
permitted to allocate or reallocate any CIL Joint Account Block or any 
portion thereof to or from the defaulting CIL Funds Lender.
    Paragraph (c) would further provide that, to the extent FICC 
determines it is feasible and consistent with applicable law, FICC 
would exercise remedies in a manner that does not have a significant 
adverse impact on the interest of any non-defaulting CIL Funds Lender 
in the relevant CIL Joint Account Block or the related Purchased GC 
Repo Securities. If FICC determines that it is impossible to exercise 
remedies against a defaulting CIL Funds Lender without having a 
significant adverse impact on the interests of a non-defaulting CIL 
Funds Lender (for example, because the CIL Joint Account Block has not 
been allocated), FICC would refrain from exercising remedies against 
the defaulting party except to facilitate movement of any Margin Excess 
Amount or on the maturity date of the CIL Joint Account Block, at which 
time FICC would exercise its rights as a secured party to cause the 
transfer of the Purchased GC Repo Securities against the amount due 
under the CIL Joint Account Block. In relation to any non-defaulting 
CIL Funds Lender, such exercise of remedies shall constitute settlement 
of its portion of the CIL Joint Account Block. FICC would only be 
required to refrain from exercising remedies if it determines that 
refraining from exercising such remedies is not prohibited by, and 
would not prejudice its rights under, applicable law (including 
insolvency laws applicable to the defaulting CIL Funds Lender) and is 
necessary to preserve the interests of non-defaulting CIL Funds 
Lenders.
(D) Funds-Only Settlement (``FOS'')
1. Overview
    Under the existing Sponsored GC Service, the only Funds-Only 
Settlement Amounts that the pre-Novation counterparties to a Sponsored 
GC Trade are obligated to pay to FICC and entitled to receive from FICC 
are the Forward Mark Adjustment Payment and Interest Adjustment 
Payment. The reason FICC exchanges such amounts with the pre-Novation 
counterparties is to address the risk that the pre-Novation 
counterparty (or its Sponsoring Member or Agent Clearing Member, as 
applicable) defaults and FICC needs to enter into a replacement 
transaction at market interest rates in order to perform to the other 
pre-Novation counterparty. In such a situation, ambient interest rates 
may have shifted since the date of Novation of the Sponsored GC Trade 
such that the cost to FICC of entering into the replacement transaction 
at market rates may be greater or less than what the cost would have 
been at the time the Sponsored GC Trade was originally Novated. The 
Forward Mark Adjustment Payment captures the loss or gain to FICC and 
the defaulting pre-Novation counterparty of such greater or lower costs 
and thereby ensures that FICC and the pre-Novation counterparty are 
made whole in the event FICC ceases to act for the pre-Novation 
counterparty. The Interest Adjustment Payment serves to compensate the 
payer of the Forward Mark Adjustment Payment for the time value of the 
payment.
    In the context of the CIL Service, FICC's lien on the Purchased GC 
Repo Securities and ability to instruct the Sponsored GC Clearing Agent 
Bank to transfer such securities would effectively ensure that FICC 
never needs to enter into a replacement transaction to address the 
default of a CIL Funds Lender (or its Sponsoring Member). Rather, FICC 
would rely upon its lien

[[Page 44419]]

and instruction right to settle with the GC Funds Borrower or, if the 
GC Funds Borrower is the Sponsoring Member or its Indirect Participant, 
possibly terminate both the transaction with the CIL Funds Lender and 
GC Funds Borrower such that no replacement transaction is required.
    FICC is therefore proposing for FICC not to pay or collect Funds-
Only Settlement Amounts to or from a CIL Funds Lender (or its 
Sponsoring Member) in relation to a Sponsored GC CIL Trade. FICC would 
still collect Funds-Only Settlement Amounts from the GC Funds Borrower 
in relation to the Sponsored GC CIL Trade because, in the event the GC 
Funds Borrower (or its Sponsoring Member or Agent Clearing Member, as 
applicable) defaults, FICC might need to enter into a replacement 
transaction to perform to the CIL Funds Lender. However, FICC would not 
pay Funds-Only Settlement Amounts to the GC Funds Borrower because FICC 
would not be collecting such amounts from the CIL Funds Lender.
    FICC understands from its engagement with market participants that 
eliminating the exchange of Funds-Only Settlement Amounts with CIL 
Funds Lenders would facilitate the ability of RICs and other cash 
providers to access FICC's clearance and settlement services. This is 
because RICs and other cash providers generally do not have the 
operational capacity to engage in twice-daily exchanges of Funds-Only 
Settlement Amounts and, even if they did, passing such amounts through 
a Sponsoring Member may not be consistent with a RIC's obligations 
under Section 17(f) of the Investment Company Act, depending on the 
identity of the Sponsoring Member.\38\ In light of these challenges, 
FICC understands that Sponsoring Members generally assume the 
obligation of RICs and other GC Funds Lenders to pay Funds-Only 
Settlement Amounts in exchange for the Sponsoring Member being able to 
keep any such amounts paid by FICC.\39\ However, expanding that 
practice may be infeasible and expensive, particularly in the context 
of term or done-away transactions. In term transactions, the Forward 
Mark Adjustment Payment may be substantially greater than in overnight 
transactions, while in done-away transactions the Forward Mark 
Adjustment Payment can have a real liquidity impact on the Sponsoring 
Member since the Sponsoring Member will not receive an equivalent 
amount from FICC as ``the other side'' of the trade. Furthermore, FICC 
understands that requiring Sponsoring Members that do not otherwise 
guarantee the obligations of CIL Funds Lenders to cover the CIL Funds 
Lender's Funds-Only Settlement Amount obligations could have regulatory 
capital implications for Sponsoring Members. In light of the foregoing, 
FICC believes that eliminating the need for CIL Funds Lenders or their 
Sponsoring Members to post Funds-Only Settlement Amounts would make it 
easier for RICs and other cash providers to transact using FICC's CIL 
Service.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \38\ See, e.g., 15 U.S.C. 80a-17(f); Letter from Ken Bentsen, 
supra note 5.
    \39\ See 2024 SIFMA Master Treasury Securities Clearing 
Agreement: Done-with, Module II, Section 5 (``. . . Customer and 
Clearing Member agree that (a) Clearing Member shall satisfy any 
obligation of Customer to FICC to pay any Funds-Only Settlement 
Amount in respect of the Customer Sponsored GC Trades; and (b) in 
consideration of the agreement of Clearing Member not to seek 
reimbursement of such amount described in clause (a) from Customer, 
Clearing Member shall be entitled to any Funds-Only Settlement 
Amount in respect of the Customer Sponsored GC Trades due to 
Customer from FICC.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Summary of Proposed Rule Changes
    To effectuate the proposed changes described above, FICC proposes 
to (i) amend Section 9 of Rule 3A to provide that Sponsored GC CIL 
Trades would not be subject to Section 9(b) of Rule 3A, which specifies 
the Funds-Only Settlement Amount obligations generally applicable to 
Sponsored GC Trades, (ii) renumber existing Section 9(c) of Rule 3A as 
Section 9(d), and (iii) add a new Section 9(c) to Rule 3A to provide 
that neither a CIL Funds Lender nor its Sponsoring Member shall be 
obligated to pay to FICC and/or be entitled to receive from FICC, any 
amounts arising in relation to the Sponsored GC CIL Trades under Rule 
13. The new Section 9(c) would further provide that each GC Funds 
Borrower would be obligated to pay FICC, but would not be entitled to 
receive from FICC, any Forward Mark Adjustment Payments and associated 
Interest Adjustment Payments in accordance with Rules 13 and 3A in 
relation to each Sponsored GC CIL Trade, provided that at the maturity 
of such Sponsored GC CIL Trade, FICC would pay to the GC Funds Borrower 
any such amounts so collected.
(iii) Done-Away Sponsored GC Trades
(A) Overview
    Currently, a Sponsoring Member may submit only ``done-with'' 
transactions to FICC under the Sponsored GC Service (i.e., transactions 
between the Sponsored Member and the Sponsoring Member).\40\ FICC 
proposes to amend its Rules to permit a Sponsoring Member to submit to 
FICC for clearing under the existing Sponsored GC Service done-away 
transactions (i.e., transactions entered into between a Sponsored 
Member and either a Netting Member that is not the Sponsoring Member or 
an Indirect Participant of any Netting Member). FICC is proposing to 
effectuate this change by revising a number of defined terms and 
certain sections in Rule 3A to make clear that counterparties to a 
Sponsored GC Trade do not need to be a Sponsored Member and its 
Sponsoring Member, but instead can be a Sponsored Member and any 
Netting Member or its Indirect Participant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \40\ See Rule 1, supra note 3 (defining a Sponsored GC Trade as 
``a Sponsored Member Trade that is a Repo Transaction between a 
Sponsored Member and its Sponsoring Member involving securities 
represented by a Generic CUSIP Number the data on which are 
submitted to [FICC] by the Sponsoring Member pursuant to the 
provisions of Rule 6A, for Novation to [FICC] pursuant to Section 
7(b)(ii) of Rule 3A'' in connection with the Sponsored GC Service; 
and defining a Sponsored Member Trade as ``(a) a transaction that 
satisfies the requirements of Section 5 of Rule 3A and that is (i) 
between a Sponsored Member and its Sponsoring Member or (ii) between 
a Sponsored Member and a Netting Member or (b) a Sponsored GC 
Trade.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FICC's risk management and liquidity requirements in respect of 
done-away Sponsored GC Trades would not be different from those in 
respect of done-away Sponsored DVP Trades. Done-away Sponsored GC 
Trades would also be subject to all applicable requirements as done-
with Sponsored GC Trades. Furthermore, as with existing Sponsored 
Member Trades, the liquidation provision in Section 18 of Rule 3A would 
only be applicable to done-with Sponsored GC Trades.\41\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \41\ FICC has proposed rule changes that would include changing 
the numbering of Section 18 to Section 16 in Rule 3A. See Securities 
Exchange Act Release No. 103282 (June 17, 2025), 90 FR 26656 (June 
23, 2025) (SR-FICC-2025-015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In connection with this proposed change, FICC is also proposing to 
extend the deadline set forth in the Schedule of Sponsored GC Trade 
Timeframes for (i) full settlement of the Start Leg of Sponsored GC 
Trades, (ii) substitutions of Purchased GC Repo Securities, and (iii) 
satisfaction of GC Collateral Return Obligations and cash payment 
obligations associated with GC Collateral Return Entitlements by GC 
Funds Lenders and GC Funds Borrowers. The current deadline for these 
actions is 5:30 p.m. and the proposal would move this deadline to 7:00 
p.m. (New York City times), which would align with the close of the 
Fedwire Funds Service at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. 
Currently,

[[Page 44420]]

Sponsored GC Trades for which funds are delivered between 5:30 p.m. and 
7:00 p.m. do not settle until the next Business Day. Aligning these two 
deadlines would facilitate additional settlement of Sponsored GC 
Trades.
(B) Summary of Proposed Rule Changes
    Revisions to defined terms. FICC proposes to revise the following 
defined terms in Rule 1: (1) GC Collateral Return Entitlement, (2) GC 
Collateral Return Obligation, (3) GC Funds Borrower, (4) GC Funds 
Lender, (5) Purchased GC Repo Securities, (6) Sponsored GC Trade, and 
(7) Sponsored Member Trade, each as described in greater detail below.
    FICC proposes to revise the definitions of GC Collateral Return 
Entitlement, GC Collateral Return Obligation, GC Funds Borrower, and GC 
Funds Lender to (i) replace references to ``a Sponsoring Member or 
Sponsored Member'' with references to ``a Netting Member or its 
Indirect Participant'', and (ii) provide that only a Sponsored Member 
can be the GC Funds Lender and have a GC Collateral Return Obligation 
in relation to a Sponsored GC CIL Trade.
    FICC proposes to revise the definition of Purchased GC Repo 
Securities to replace references to ``Sponsoring Member or Sponsored 
Member'' with references to ``GC Funds Borrower.''
    FICC proposes to revise the definition of Sponsored GC Trade to 
replace ``its Sponsoring Member'' with ``a Netting Member or its 
Indirect Participant'' and to eliminate the unnecessary reference 
therein to Sponsored Member Trade.
    FICC proposes to redefine the term Sponsored Member Trade as a 
transaction that satisfies the requirements of Section 5 of Rule 3A or 
a Sponsored GC Trade that, in each case, is (i) between a Sponsored 
Member and its Sponsoring Member or (ii) between a Sponsored Member and 
another Netting Member or an Indirect Participant of the Sponsoring 
Member or another Netting Member. FICC would also make conforming 
changes to the definition of Same-Day Settling Trade to align with 
these revisions.
    Conforming and clarifying changes. FICC proposes to make a number 
of conforming and clarifying changes in Sections 7, 8, and 16 of Rule 
3A, each as described in greater detail below.
    FICC proposes to amend Sections 7(b)(iv) and 8(b)(vi) of Rule 3A to 
replace the references to ``Sponsoring Member and Sponsored Member'' 
with references to ``GC Funds Borrower and GC Funds Lender''.
    FICC proposes to amend Section 8(a)(iii) of Rule 3A to conform to 
the revisions being proposed to the definition of Sponsored Member 
Trade and ensure that the statement regarding the availability of the 
Pair-Off Service to Sponsored Member Trades other than Sponsored GC 
Trades be correct.
    FICC proposes to amend Section 8(b)(iv) of Rule 3A to make clear 
that FICC would pay GC Daily Repo Interest to ``the GC Funds Lender, if 
the repo rate is positive for the relevant Sponsored GC Trade, or to 
the GC Funds Borrower, if the repo rate is negative for the relevant 
Sponsored GC Trade,'' instead of paying such interest to ``the GC Funds 
Lender or GC Funds Borrower, as applicable.''
    FICC proposes to amend Section 16(a) of Rule 3A to provide that the 
liquidation mechanism under Section 16 is only applicable to done-with 
transactions, i.e., Sponsored Member Trades between a Sponsored Member 
and its Sponsoring Member.
Implementation Timeframe
    Subject to approval by the Commission, FICC would implement the 
proposed rule change by no later than 6 months after approval. FICC 
would announce the effective date of the proposed changes by an 
Important Notice posted to its website.
2. Statutory Basis
    FICC believes these proposed changes are consistent with the 
requirements of the Act, and the rules and regulations thereunder 
applicable to FICC. Specifically, FICC believes that the proposed 
changes are consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act,\42\ and 
Rule 17ad-22(e)(4)(i),\43\ Rule 17ad-22(e)(6),\44\ Rule 17ad-
22(e)(18)(ii),\45\ Rule 17ad-22(e)(18)(iv)(C),\46\ Rule 17ad-
22(e)(19),\47\ and Rule 17ad-22(e)(23)(ii),\48\ as promulgated under 
the Act, for the reasons stated below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \42\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
    \43\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(4)(i).
    \44\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(6).
    \45\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(18)(ii).
    \46\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(18)(iv)(C).
    \47\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(19).
    \48\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(23)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act requires, in part, that the Rules 
be designed to assure the safeguarding of securities and funds which 
are in the custody or control of the clearing agency or for which it is 
responsible.\49\ The proposed amendments would not provide FICC with 
custody of any additional securities. The Purchased GC Repo Securities 
would remain in the custody of the Sponsored GC Clearing Agent Bank, in 
the Buyer's GC CIL Trade Account. However, the proposed CIL Custodial 
Agreement Supplement would provide FICC with ``control'' of Purchased 
GC Repo Securities subject to a Sponsored GC CIL Trade as a matter of 
the Uniform Commercial Code as in effect in the State of New York.\50\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \49\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
    \50\ UCC 8-106(d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FICC believes that the proposed rule changes are designed to assure 
the safeguarding of the Purchased GC Repo Securities subject to its 
control. As noted above, FICC's lien and control are specifically 
designed so that FICC can complete settlement of Sponsored GC CIL 
Trades even in a default of the CIL Funds Lender or Sponsoring Member. 
In furtherance of the foregoing, the CIL Custodial Agreement Supplement 
and proposed changes to the text of the Rules would only permit FICC to 
instruct the transfer of the Purchased GC Repo Securities out of the 
Buyer's GC CIL Trade Account if such transfer is in connection with the 
transfer of any Margin Excess Amount or in the amount equal to any cash 
due to the CIL Funds Lender. Furthermore, the CIL Custodial Agreement 
Supplement would prohibit any withdrawals of the Purchased GC Repo 
Securities by the CIL Funds Lender other than to allow for ordinary 
course settlement, in a Corporation Default, or in respect of 
securities that FICC does not intend to use to complete settlement with 
the GC Funds Borrower on the Sponsored GC CIL Trade. Accordingly, the 
proposed changes would ensure that the Purchased GC Repo Securities 
subject to FICC's control remain safeguarded in the Buyer's GC CIL 
Trade Account at the Sponsored GC Clearing Agent Bank until such time 
as they are needed for settlement or the Sponsored GC CIL Trade is 
terminated.
    More broadly, the proposed changes are designed to ensure that FICC 
calculates and has sufficient resources to cover potential losses from 
a default on a done-away Sponsored GC Trade or on a Sponsored GC CIL 
Trade. Under the proposed rule changes, non-CIL done-away Sponsored GC 
Trades, which FICC believes present the same market risk as done-with 
Sponsored GC Trades, would be subject to the same margin requirements 
as done-with Sponsored GC Trades. The Commission found last year that 
such margin requirements ``limit FICC's risk to a Netting Member or 
indirect participant default and thereby enhance its ability to 
safeguard securities and funds in its control and for which it is 
responsible.'' \51\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \51\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 101695 (Nov. 21, 
2024), 89 FR 93763 (Nov. 27, 2024) (SR-FICC-2024-007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the case of Sponsored GC CIL Trades, FICC's perfected security

[[Page 44421]]

interest in the Purchased GC Repo Securities subject to the Sponsored 
GC CIL Trades, as supplemented by the Clearing Fund posted by the 
Sponsoring Member for its Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Account, the 
mandatory CIL Required Haircut, and any Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus 
Account Required Fund Deposit, is designed to ensure that FICC has 
sufficient resources to address a default of a CIL Funds Lender or its 
Sponsoring Member. As noted above, the perfected security interest as 
well as FICC's right to instruct the Sponsored GC Clearing Agent Bank 
in relation to such securities would ensure that FICC can settle with 
the GC Funds Borrower in a CIL Funds Lender default or the default of 
its Sponsoring Member, provided that the Sponsoring Member or its 
Indirect Participant is not the GC Funds Borrower. If the Sponsoring 
Member or its Indirect Participant is the GC Funds Borrower, FICC may 
need to terminate the Sponsored GC Trade in whole or in part and rely 
upon the Sponsoring Member's Clearing Fund, the CIL Required Haircut, 
or the Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Account Required Fund Deposit to cover 
any losses resulting from the liquidation. Such amounts, however, would 
never be less than the Clearing Fund FICC would have available for a 
Sponsored GC Trade. FICC therefore believes that the proposed changes 
would enhance its ability to safeguard funds and securities which are 
in the custody or control of FICC or for which it is responsible.
    Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act also requires that the Rules be 
designed to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in 
the clearance and settlement of securities transactions, remove 
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a national system for the 
prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities 
transactions, and, in general, protect investors and the public 
interest.\52\ FICC believes that the proposed changes are designed to 
meet these goals.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \52\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    First, FICC understands from its engagement with market 
participants that there are currently a number of constraints on the 
ability of RICs and other cash providers to access FICC's clearance and 
settlement services, including (i) the ``double margining'' arising 
from RICs' need for haircuts and inability to post margin to FICC, (ii) 
the capital requirements associated with providing the Sponsoring 
Member Guaranty, and (iii) the limitations on a Sponsoring Member's 
ability to submit to FICC transactions entered into through joint 
trading accounts. By creating the CIL Service, FICC would eliminate 
``double margining'' by taking a perfected security interest in the 
Purchased GC Repo Securities in lieu of some or all of the required 
margin. The lien would also allow FICC not to require a Sponsoring 
Member to guarantee the obligations of a CIL Funds Lender under a 
Sponsored GC CIL Trade. The elimination of such guarantee requirement 
would have substantial capital savings for the Sponsoring Member (and 
corresponding cost savings for the CIL Funds Lender). FICC would also 
accommodate the clearance and settlement of Sponsored GC CIL Trades 
entered into through a joint trading account even before such 
transactions have been allocated. Accordingly, the proposed changes are 
designed to remove these impediments for RICs and other cash providers 
to access FICC's clearance and settlement services.
    Second, FICC understands from its engagement with market 
participants that Sponsoring Members typically agree to assume a 
Sponsored Member's Funds-Only Settlement Amount obligations, and to 
receive a Sponsored Member's Funds-Only Settlement Amount entitlements, 
under Sponsored GC Trades to address operational and regulatory 
concerns of RICs and other cash providers. However, as mentioned above, 
FICC believes that it may be infeasible or expensive for Sponsoring 
Members to do this on a broader scale, particularly in relation to term 
transactions or done-away ones. This is because the capital, liquidity, 
and cost consequences of satisfying a Sponsored Member's Funds-Only 
Settlement Amount obligations in relation to term or done-away 
transactions may be substantially greater than for done-with overnight 
transactions. Furthermore, any such costs would ultimately not outweigh 
the benefits of exchanging Funds-Only Settlement Amounts with a CIL 
Funds Lender (or its Sponsoring Member) considering FICC's proposed 
lien on the Purchased GC Repo Securities and right to instruct the 
Sponsored GC Clearing Agent Bank in relation to such securities would 
obviate the risk that such Funds-Only Settlement Amounts are designed 
to address. Accordingly, FICC believes that eliminating the need for 
FICC to exchange Funds-Only Settlement Amounts with CIL Funds Lenders 
would remove potential impediments that could limit access to FICC's 
clearance and settlement systems.
    Third, FICC understands from its engagement with market 
participants that a robust done-away clearing market can promote market 
liquidity by allowing for all-to-all trading. In addition, done-away 
clearing can eliminate the substantial time and expenses of RICs and 
other cash providers needing to enter into clearing documentation with 
each and every one of their trading counterparties. The proposed 
changes to provide for the clearing of done-away Sponsored GC Trades 
would therefore promote cooperation and coordination with persons 
engaged in the clearance and settlement of securities transactions, 
perfect the mechanism of a national system for the prompt and accurate 
clearance and settlement of securities transactions, and protect the 
public interest.
    Given the foregoing, FICC believes the proposed changes are 
designed to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in 
the clearance and settlement of securities transactions, remove 
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a national system for the 
prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities 
transactions, and in general, protect investors and the public 
interest, consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.\53\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \53\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rule 17ad-22(e)(4)(i) under the Act requires that FICC establish, 
implement, maintain, and enforce written policies and procedures 
reasonably designed to effectively identify, measure, monitor, and 
manage its credit exposures to participants and those arising from its 
payment, clearing, and settlement processes by maintaining sufficient 
financial resources to cover its credit exposure to each participant 
fully with a high degree of confidence.\54\ FICC believes the proposed 
changes are consistent with this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \54\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(4)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    First, the proposed changes relating to the risk and default 
management mechanism for the CIL Service, i.e., FICC's perfected 
security interest in the Purchased GC Repo Securities subject to the 
Sponsored GC CIL Trades, supplemented by the Clearing Fund for the 
Sponsoring Member's Sponsoring Member Omnibus Account, the mandatory 
CIL Required Haircut, and the Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Account Required 
Fund Deposit requirement, would ensure both that the quantum of 
resources accessible by FICC to manage the default on a Sponsored GC 
CIL Trade would accurately reflect FICC's credit exposures to 
participants in the CIL Service and that FICC would be able to use such 
resources to cover its exposure in the event of a default by the CIL 
Funds Lender or its Sponsoring

[[Page 44422]]

Member. Second, under the proposed changes, the done-away Sponsored GC 
Trades (other than Sponsored GC CIL Trades), which present the same 
credit and market risk profile as done-with Sponsored GC Trades, would 
be margined and risk managed in the same manner as done-with Sponsored 
GC Trades using methodologies that have been approved by the 
Commission. Meanwhile, done-away Sponsored GC Trades, which present the 
same liquidity risks as other done-away transactions, would be treated 
identically to such other done-away transactions for purposes of 
calculating a Sponsoring Member's Capped Contingency Liquidity Facility 
obligations. Therefore, collectively, these changes would enhance the 
ability of FICC to manage the risk of the transactions it clears and 
settles and cover its credit exposure to its participants with a high 
degree of confidence.
    Rule 17ad-22(e)(6) under the Act requires, in part, that FICC 
establish, implement, maintain and enforce written policies and 
procedures reasonably designed to cover its credit exposures to its 
participants by establishing a risk-based margin system.\55\ The 
proposed changes would provide FICC with enough margin to ensure it 
will have sufficient resources to perform to non-defaulting 
participants in a participant default. In particular, the proposed 
changes would provide FICC, in the form of Purchased GC Repo Securities 
and Clearing Fund deposits, with resources to address a CIL Funds 
Lender default that are equal to, or in excess of, the resources FICC 
calculates using its established and approved risk-based models as 
necessary to address the default of a Sponsored Member under a 
Sponsored GC Trade. Accordingly, the proposed changes would ensure FICC 
covers its credit exposures to its participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \55\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rule 17ad-22(e)(18)(ii) under the Act requires FICC to establish, 
implement, maintain and enforce written policies and procedures 
reasonably designed to establish objective, risk-based, and publicly 
disclosed criteria for participation, which require participants to 
have sufficient financial resources and robust operational capacity to 
meet obligations arising from participation in FICC.\56\ The proposed 
changes--which would (i) not impose margin requirements for Sponsored 
GC CIL Trades except for Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Account Required Fund 
Deposit, if any, and (ii) make done-away Sponsored GC Trades (other 
than Sponsored GC CIL Trades) subject to FICC's existing margin 
requirements applicable to done-with Sponsored GC Trades--would provide 
objective, risk-based, and publicly disclosed criteria for Sponsoring 
Members that would clear Sponsored GC CIL Trades or done-away Sponsored 
GC Trades for customers regarding the specific margin requirements to 
which they would be subject. In addition, the requirement for CIL Funds 
Lenders to execute a CIL Custodial Agreement Supplement as prescribed 
by FICC would further provide objective, risk-based, and publicly 
disclosed criteria for CIL Funds Lenders, the GC Funds Borrowers, and, 
if applicable, their Sponsoring Members on certain operational 
requirements for participating in the CIL Service as well as FICC's 
lien on the Purchased GC Repo Securities subject to the Sponsored GC 
CIL Trades. Therefore, collectively, the proposed changes would improve 
public disclosure for participation in FICC's services, including with 
respect to the relevant financial and operational requirements in 
connection with Sponsored GC CIL Trades.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \56\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(18)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rule 17ad-22(e)(18)(iv)(C) requires, in part, that FICC establish, 
implement, maintain and enforce written policies and procedures 
reasonably designed to ensure that it has appropriate means to 
facilitate access to clearance and settlement services of all eligible 
secondary market transactions in U.S. Treasury securities, including 
those of indirect participants.\57\ FICC believes that the proposed 
changes would very much facilitate access to its clearing and 
settlement services for ESMTs by eliminating or ameliorating certain 
existing impediments to access that RICs and other cash providers face.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \57\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(18)(iv)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    First, FICC's security interest in the Purchased GC Repo Securities 
would eliminate the ``double margining'' that increases the costs (and 
thereby decreases the ability of) a Sponsoring Member to provide 
clearance and settlement services to RICs and other cash providers. The 
lien would also eliminate the need for the Sponsoring Member to 
guarantee the obligations of a CIL Funds Lender. FICC understands from 
its engagement with market participants that eliminating the guarantee 
would reduce the capital requirements associated with a Sponsoring 
Member providing access to FICC's clearance and settlement systems, and 
thus the costs of providing such access.
    Second, the CIL Service would allow a Sponsoring Member to submit 
to FICC for clearance and settlement transactions that have been 
entered into by multiple RICs or other CIL Funds Lenders using a joint 
trading account. Such transactions may be ineligible for submission to 
FICC today because investment advisers are unable to complete final 
allocations to individual cash providers by the FICC submission 
deadline. As a result, the proposed changes would facilitate the 
ability of RICs and other cash providers to access FICC's clearance and 
settlement services in relation to transactions that they are currently 
only able to clear bilaterally.
    Third, the CIL Service would not provide for FICC to exchange 
Funds-Only Settlement Amounts with a CIL Funds Lender (or its 
Sponsoring Member). FICC believes this would facilitate access by 
eliminating the possibility of such Funds-Only Settlement Amount 
obligations and entitlements giving rise to operational or regulatory 
impediments for RICs, other cash providers, and their Sponsoring 
Members. As such, FICC believes that adding the CIL Service would 
facilitate access to clearance and settlement services of all eligible 
secondary market transactions in U.S. Treasury securities, including 
those of indirect participants.\58\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \58\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Fourth, the inclusion of language in the Rules and the CIL 
Custodial Agreement Supplement of various provisions to facilitate the 
ability of RICs acting as CIL Funds Lenders to conclude that Sponsored 
GC CIL Trades are ``Collateralized Fully'' within the meaning of 
Investment Company Act Rule 5b-3 would allow RICs to access FICC's 
clearance and settlement services consistently with their regulatory 
obligations.
    FICC also believes that the proposed changes to provide for 
clearing of done-away Sponsored GC Trades and to extend its settlement 
deadline for Sponsored GC Trades would promote access to FICC's 
clearance and settlement systems in respect of ESMTs. Currently, a 
Sponsoring Member may submit only done-with transactions to FICC under 
the Sponsored GC Service. Allowing for the submission of done-away 
transactions would facilitate greater access by allowing a Sponsored 
Member to submit more of their ESMTs and to do so without entering into 
clearing agreements with each of their execution counterparties. The 
proposed change to align FICC's settlement and substitution deadlines 
for Sponsored GC Trades with the close of the Fedwire

[[Page 44423]]

Funds Service at 7:00 p.m. (New York City time) would support the 
settlement of additional tri-party activity and, therefore, also 
promote access to FICC's clearance and settlement systems in respect of 
ESMTs. As such, FICC believes that providing for done-away Sponsored GC 
Trades and extending its settlement and substitution deadline for 
Sponsored GC Trades, as described above, would facilitate access to 
clearance and settlement services of all eligible secondary market 
transactions in U.S. Treasury securities.\59\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \59\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rule 17ad-22(e)(19) under the Act requires that FICC establish, 
implement, maintain and enforce written policies and procedures 
reasonably designed to identify, monitor, and manage the material risks 
to the covered clearing agency arising from arrangements in which firms 
that are indirect participants in the covered clearing agency rely on 
the services provided by direct participants to access the covered 
clearing agency's payment, clearing, or settlement facilities.\60\ The 
proposed changes relating to the CIL Service contain specific risk 
management features relating to FICC's exposure from CIL Funds Lenders, 
including (i) a lien on the Purchased GC Repo Securities subject to the 
Sponsored GC CIL Trades that would allow FICC to settle with the GC 
Funds Borrower even in a CIL Funds Lender default, (ii) clear 
provisions describing how FICC would enforce remedies and otherwise 
address such a default, and (iii) the Clearing Fund, mandatory CIL 
Required Haircut, and Sponsored GC CIL Omnibus Account Required Fund 
Deposit that FICC would require to ensure it has sufficient resources 
to cover simultaneous default of both a CIL Funds Lender and its 
Sponsoring Member. Accordingly, the proposed changes would promote 
FICC's ability to identify, monitor, and manage the material risks 
arising from indirect participants' access its payment, clearing, or 
settlement facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \60\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(19).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rule 17ad-22(e)(23)(ii) under the Act requires that FICC establish, 
implement, maintain and enforce written policies and procedures 
reasonably designed to provide sufficient information to enable 
participants to identify and evaluate the risks, fees, and other 
material costs they incur by participating in the covered clearing 
agency.\61\ As described above, the proposed changes would include 
clear provisions on the parameters of the CIL Service (including who 
could act as a CIL Funds Lender, the requirement to execute a CIL 
Custodial Agreement Supplement, the treatment of Funds-Only Settlement 
Amounts, and the use of joint trading accounts) as well as how the 
Sponsored GC CIL Trades would be risk managed. In addition, the 
proposed changes relating to done-away Sponsored GC Trades would 
clarify that such transactions would be subject to all applicable 
requirements to done-with Sponsored GC Trades, except that the Start 
Leg of a done-away Sponsored GC Trade would be eligible for Novation 
and the liquidation provision in Section 16 of Rule 3A would only be 
applicable to done-with Sponsored GC Trades. These changes would 
accordingly provide clarity to market participants to enable them to 
evaluate the risks and costs of participating in the CIL Service or 
clearing done-away Sponsored GC Trades consistent with Rule 17ad-
22(e)(23)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \61\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(23)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(B) Clearing Agency's Statement on Burden on Competition

    FICC believes that the proposed changes would promote competition 
by addressing some of the conditions that make it more difficult and 
more expensive for RICs than for certain other cash providers to access 
FICC's clearance and settlement system. As mentioned above, due to 
their regulatory requirements, including in particular the requirement 
to collect haircuts and the limitations on posting margin to FICC under 
the Investment Company Act, cleared transactions with RICs are subject 
to ``double margining.'' Such double margining makes it more expensive 
for Sponsoring Members to offer RICs access to clearing relative to 
some other cash providers. By eliminating the double margining through 
its security interest on the Purchased GC Repo Securities, FICC 
believes the CIL Service would promote competition between RICs and 
other cash providers and place them on a more level playing field.
    Furthermore, FICC believes that the proposed changes would 
encourage the submission of a greater number and variety of securities 
transactions, including, in particular, transactions executed by a 
Joint Account Agent on behalf of multiple Sponsored Members. As 
described above, many RICs currently execute ESMTs through ``joint 
trading accounts'' to achieve administrative efficiencies. However, a 
Sponsoring Member cannot generally submit such a transaction for 
central clearing because the Joint Account Agent is typically unable to 
complete the final allocation by the FICC submission deadline. By 
eliminating the need for a CIL Joint Account Agent to render such 
allocation prior to submission, the proposed CIL Service would promote 
competition because it would encourage Sponsored Members, RICs and 
other cash providers to submit to FICC a greater number and variety of 
securities transactions.
    FICC believes that the proposed changes to provide for the clearing 
of done-away Sponsored GC Trades would also promote competition because 
they would incentivize Sponsoring Members to offer clearing services 
for such transactions and facilitate RICs and other cash providers 
access to clearance and settlement services, causing them to enter into 
a greater number of done-away Sponsored GC Trades and submit such 
trades to FICC for clearance and settlement.

(C) Clearing Agency's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change 
Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    FICC reviewed the proposed rule change with Sponsoring Members and 
Sponsored Members in order to benefit from their expertise. Written 
comments relating to this proposed rule change received in connection 
with such outreach included feedback to the proposal provided by 
counsel to an industry association representing regulated investment 
funds. Such written comments included (i) recommendations for certain 
changes to the text of proposed rule changes and the required terms for 
a CIL Custodial Agreement Supplement so as to facilitate the ability of 
RICs to conclude that Sponsored GC CIL Trades are ``Collateralized 
Fully'' within the meaning of Investment Company Act Rule 5b-3, and 
(ii) certain operational questions related to the CIL Service. These 
comments and questions have been resolved, which resolution is 
reflected in the proposed rule changes described.
    If any additional written comments are received by FICC, they will 
be publicly filed as an Exhibit 2 to this filing, as required by Form 
19b-4 and the General Instructions thereto.
    Persons submitting comments are cautioned that, according to 
Section IV (Solicitation of Comments) of the Exhibit 1A in the General 
Instructions to Form 19b-4, the Commission does not edit personal 
identifying information from comment submissions. Commenters should 
submit only information that they wish to make available publicly, 
including their name, email address, and any other identifying 
information.
    All prospective commenters should follow the Commission's 
instructions on

[[Page 44424]]

how to submit comments, available at <a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/how-submit-comment">www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/how-submit-comment</a>. General questions regarding the rule filing process or 
logistical questions regarding this filing should be directed to the 
Main Office of the SEC's Division of Trading and Markets at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a8dcdac9ccc1c6cfc9c6ccc5c9dac3cddcdbe8dbcdcb86cfc7de"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ce8eefdf8f5f2fbfdf2f8f1fdeef7f9e8efdceff9ffb2fbf3ea">[email&#160;protected]</span></a> or 202-551-5777.
    FICC reserves the right to not respond to any comments received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change, and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the 
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be 
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) by order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or
    (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

    <bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
    <bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#483a3d242d652b2725252d263c3b083b2d2b662f273e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1765627b723a74787a7a727963645764727439707861">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. Please include 
file number SR-FICC-2025-019 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

    <bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FICC-2025-019. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). Copies 
of the filing will be available for inspection and copying at the 
principal office of FICC and on DTCC's website (<a href="http://www.dtcc.com/legal/sec-rule-filings">www.dtcc.com/legal/sec-rule-filings</a>). Do not include personal identifiable information in 
submissions; you should submit only information that you wish to make 
available publicly. We may redact in part or withhold entirely from 
publication submitted material that is obscene or subject to copyright 
protection. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FICC-2025-
019 and should be submitted on or before October 6, 2025.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\62\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \62\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-17729 Filed 9-12-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on September 15, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.