Notice2025-17682

Certain Aluminum Foil From the Sultanate of Oman: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
September 12, 2025

Issuing agencies

Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Oman Aluminium Rolling Company (OARC) made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), November 1, 2022, through October 31, 2023.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 175 (Friday, September 12, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 175 (Friday, September 12, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44162-44163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-17682]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-523-815]


Certain Aluminum Foil From the Sultanate of Oman: Final Results 
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that 
Oman Aluminium Rolling Company (OARC) made sales of subject merchandise 
at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), November 
1, 2022, through October 31, 2023.

DATES: Applicable September 12, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexander Cipolla, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4956.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On December 13, 2024, Commerce published the Preliminary Results 
and invited interested parties to comment.\1\ On December 9, 2024, 
Commerce tolled certain deadlines by 90 days.\2\ On April 30, 2025, the 
petitioners and OARC filed timely case briefs.\3\ On May 5, 2025, the 
petitioners and OARC filed timely rebuttal briefs.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Aluminum Foil from the Sultanate of Oman: 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-
2023, 89 FR 100976 (December 13, 2024) (Preliminary Results).
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings,'' dated December 9, 2024. As this 
memorandum was issued after the Preliminary Results were signed, but 
before they were published, these final results were tolled.
    \3\ See Petitioners' Letter, ``Petitioners' Affirmative Case 
Brief,'' dated April 30, 2025 (Petitioners' Case Brief); see also 
OARC's Letter, ``Case Brief,'' dated April 30, 2025 (OARC's Case 
Brief).
    \4\ See Petitioners' Letter, ``Petitioners' Rebuttal Case 
Brief,'' dated May 5, 2025 (Petitioners' Rebuttal Brief); see also 
OARC's Letter, ``OARC's Rebuttal Brief,'' dated May 5, 2025 (OARC's 
Rebuttal Brief).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On June 30, 2025, Commerce extended the deadline for these final 
results by 60 days.\5\ The deadline for the final results of this 
review is September 8, 2025. On July 18, 2025, Commerce issued a post-
preliminary analysis in this administrative review and invited 
interested parties to comment.\6\ We received no comments from 
interested parties. For a complete description of the events that 
occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum.\7\ Commerce conducted this administrative review in 
accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for the Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated June 30, 
2025.
    \6\ See Memorandum, ``Post-Preliminary Analysis of the 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Certain Aluminum Foil from 
the Sultanate of Oman,'' dated July 18, 2025.
    \7\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 
Order on Certain Aluminum Foil from the Sultanate of Oman; 2022-
2023,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice 
(Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order <SUP>8</SUP>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Certain Aluminum Foil from the Republic of Armenia, 
Brazil, the Sultanate of Oman, the Russian Federation, and the 
Republic of Turkey: Antidumping Duty Orders, 86 FR 62790 (November 
12, 2021) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The merchandise subject to the Order is aluminum foil from Oman. 
For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Issues 
and Decision Memorandum.

Analysis of Comment Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are listed in the 
appendix to this notice and addressed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and 
is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping 
and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 
ACCESS is available to registered users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In 
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can 
be accessed directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on our review and analysis of the comments received from 
parties we made changes to OARC's preliminary results margin 
calculation. For a discussion of these changes, see the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.

Final Results of Review

    Commerce determines the following weighted-average dumping margin 
exists for the period November 3, 2022, through April 30, 2024:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Weighted-
                                                               average
                     Exporter/producer                         dumping
                                                                margin
                                                              (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oman Aluminium Rolling Company.............................       42.48
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    Commerce intends to disclose the calculations and analysis 
performed to interested parties for these final results within five 
days after public announcement or, if there is no public announcement, 
within five days after the date of publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

    Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to U.S. Customs 
and Border Protection (CBP) no earlier than 35 days after the date of 
publication of the final results of this review in the Federal 
Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of 
International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to 
liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request 
for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of 
publication). Where the respondent reported reliable entered values, we 
calculated importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem rates by 
aggregating the dumping margins calculated for all U.S. sales to each 
importer (or customer) and dividing this amount by the total entered 
value of the sales to each importer (or customer).\9\ Where Commerce 
calculated a weighted-average dumping margin by dividing the total 
amount of dumping for reviewed sales to that party by the total sales 
quantity associated with those transactions, Commerce will direct CBP 
to assess importer- (or customer-) specific assessment rates based on 
the resulting per-unit rates.\10\ Where an importer- (or customer-)

[[Page 44163]]

specific ad valorem or per-unit rate is greater than de minimis (i.e., 
0.50 percent), Commerce will instruct CBP to collect the appropriate 
duties at the time of liquidation.\11\ Where an importer- (or customer-
) specific ad valorem or per-unit rate is zero or de minimis, Commerce 
will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to 
antidumping duties.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
    \10\ Id.
    \11\ Id.
    \12\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consistent with Commerce's assessment practice, for entries of 
subject merchandise during the POR produced by OARC for which the 
producer did not know that its merchandise was destined for the United 
States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the 
all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) 
involved in the transaction.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for OARC will be 
equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final 
results of this administrative review, except if the rate is less than 
0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 
351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) 
for previously reviewed or investigated companies not participating in 
this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this 
proceeding in which the producer or exporter participated; (3) if the 
exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the 
original investigation but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will 
be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this 
proceeding for the producer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the 
cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to 
be the all-others rate established in the less-than-fair-value 
investigation (i.e., 3.89 percent).\14\ These cash deposit 
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further 
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Certain Aluminum Foil from the Sultanate of Oman: Final 
Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less-Than-Fair-Value, 86 FR 
52876 (September 23, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties 
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. 
Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's 
presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing 
duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping 
duties, and/or an increase in the amount of antidumping duties by the 
amount of the countervailing duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to an 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 
violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 
351.221(b)(5) of Commerce's regulations.

    Dated: September 8, 2025.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Application of Adverse 
Inference
V. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
VI. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Apply Total Adverse Facts 
Available (AFA) to OARC
    Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Include OARC's Cost Variances
    Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Adjust its Calculation of 
OARC's Affiliated Purchases of Liquid Aluminum
    Comment 4: Whether Commerce Erred in Its Calculation of the 
Selling and Profit
    Ratios Imputed to OARC
VII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2025-17682 Filed 9-11-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on September 12, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.