Proposed Rule2025-17081

Air Plan Approval; Texas; Reasonably Available Control Technology in the Dallas-Fort Worth Ozone Nonattainment Area

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
September 5, 2025

Issuing agencies

Environmental Protection Agency

Abstract

Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve the May 12, 2020, and May 13, 2020, revisions to the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP) as satisfying the Serious classification Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) requirement for the Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) 2008 8-hour ozone National Air Quality Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) nonattainment area. The DFW area, designated as Serious for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, consists of Collin, Dallas, Denton, Ellis, Johnson, Kaufman, Parker, Rockwall, Tarrant, and Wise Counties. Specifically, we are proposing to approve the revisions to 30 Texas Administrative Code (TAC) Chapter 115 to implement the major source Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) requirement for VOC as addressed in the VOC RACT analysis and negative declaration included with the Serious area Attainment Demonstration (AD) SIP revision. The Nitrogen Oxide (NO<INF>X</INF>) portion of the RACT analysis in the May 13, 2020, revisions will be addressed in a separate action.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 170 (Friday, September 5, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 170 (Friday, September 5, 2025)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 42885-42887]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-17081]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2020-0164; FRL-12951-01-R6]


Air Plan Approval; Texas; Reasonably Available Control Technology 
in the Dallas-Fort Worth Ozone Nonattainment Area

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act), the 
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve the May 
12, 2020, and May 13, 2020, revisions to the Texas State Implementation 
Plan (SIP) as satisfying the Serious classification Volatile Organic 
Compounds (VOC) Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) 
requirement for the Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) 2008 8-hour ozone National 
Air Quality Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) nonattainment area. 
The DFW area, designated as Serious for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, 
consists of Collin, Dallas, Denton, Ellis, Johnson, Kaufman, Parker, 
Rockwall, Tarrant, and Wise Counties. Specifically, we are proposing to 
approve the revisions to 30 Texas Administrative Code (TAC) Chapter 115 
to implement the major source Reasonably Available Control Technology 
(RACT) requirement for VOC as addressed in the VOC RACT analysis and 
negative declaration included with the Serious area Attainment 
Demonstration (AD) SIP revision. The Nitrogen Oxide (NO<INF>X</INF>) 
portion of the RACT analysis in the May 13, 2020, revisions will be 
addressed in a separate action.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before October 6, 2025.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-
2020-0164, at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> or via email to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85f6ede4edecebabe0e8e4e1c5e0f5e4abe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="493a2128212027672c24282d092c3928672e263f">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. Follow the online instructions for submitting 
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from 
<a href="http://Regulations.gov">Regulations.gov</a>. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public 
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, 
video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written 
comment is considered the official comment and should include 
discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not 
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary 
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For 
additional submission methods, please contact Emad Shahin, (214) 665-
6717, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2c5f444d4445420249414d486c495c4d024b435a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="27544f464f4e4909424a46436742574609404851">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. For the full EPA public comment policy, 
information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance 
on making effective comments, please visit <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets">https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets</a>.
    Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available 
electronically at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a>. While all documents in the 
docket are listed in the index, some information may not be publicly 
available due to docket file size restrictions or content (e.g., CBI).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emad Shahin, 214-665-6717, Emad 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#184b7079707176587d6879367f776e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ca99a2aba2a3a48aafbaabe4ada5bc">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. We encourage the public to submit comments via <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>, as there may be a delay in processing mail and 
courier or hand deliveries may not be accepted. Please call or email 
the contact listed above if you need alternative access to material 
indexed but not provided in the docket.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,'' 
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA.

I. Background

    VOCs contribute to the production of ground-level ozone, or smog, 
which harms human health and the environment. Section 182(b)(2) of the 
CAA requires that SIPs for ozone nonattainment areas classified as 
Moderate or above include implementation of RACT for any source covered 
by a Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document and also for any 
major source of VOC not covered by a CTG. It is worth noting that for 
some CTG categories, RACT is applicable to minor or area sources. The 
EPA has defined RACT as the lowest emissions limitation that a 
particular source is capable of meeting by the application of control 
technology that is reasonably available, considering technological and 
economic feasibility. See 44 FR 53761 (September 17, 1979).
    A Moderate, Serious, or Severe area major stationary source is one 
that emits, or has the potential to emit, 100, 50, or 25 tons per year 
(tpy) or more of VOCs, respectively. CAA sections 182(b) through (d). 
The EPA provides states with guidance concerning what types of controls 
could constitute RACT for a

[[Page 42886]]

given category of sources through the issuance of CTG and Alternative 
Control Techniques (ACT) documents.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See <a href="https://www.epa.gov/ground-level-ozone-pollution/control-techniques-guidelines-and-alternative-control-techniques">https://www.epa.gov/ground-level-ozone-pollution/control-techniques-guidelines-and-alternative-control-techniques</a> for 
a listing of EPA-issued CTGs and ACTs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 27, 2008, the EPA revised the primary and secondary ozone 
NAAQS to a level of 0.075 parts per million (ppm) (75 ppb).\2\ On 
October 26, 2015 (80 FR 65292), EPA promulgated another revised ozone 
NAAQS, but the 2008 NAAQS remains in effect. This notice concerns the 
VOC RACT requirements under the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Although the level of ozone NAAQS are specified in the units 
of ppm (i.e., 0.075 ppm), ozone concentrations are described using 
the units of parts per billion (ppb) in this action for consistency 
with the common convention for information discussions. In ppb, 
0.075 ppm is equivalent to 75.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS triggers a requirement for 
the EPA to designate areas as nonattainment, attainment, or 
unclassifiable, and to classify the nonattainment areas at the time of 
designation. CAA section 181(a). Nonattainment areas are classified 
according to the severity of their ozone air quality problems as 
Marginal, Moderate, Serious, Severe, or Extreme determined by each 
area's design value.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The air quality design value for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS is 
the three-year average of the annual fourth highest daily maximum 8-
hour average ozone concentration. See 40 CFR part 50, appendix I.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On May 21, 2012, the EPA published a rule establishing initial area 
designations and classifications for most areas of the country, 
including DFW, with respect to the 2008 primary and secondary 8-hour 
ozone NAAQS. 77 FR 30088. On the same day, EPA issued a separate rule 
that established air quality thresholds for each nonattainment 
classification for the 2008 NAAQS and set attainment deadlines for each 
classification. 77 FR 30160 (May 21, 2012).
    Originally the DFW area was classified as Moderate (77 FR 30088, 
May 21, 2012). Based on the Moderate classification of the DFW area for 
the 2008 ozone NAAQS, under section 182(b) of the CAA, a major 
stationary source in the area is one that emits, or has the potential 
to emit, 100 tpy or more of VOCs. However, on August 23, 2019 (84 FR 
44238), EPA found the DFW area did not attain by the 2008 ozone 
Moderate area attainment date. The DFW area was reclassified to Serious 
nonattainment with an attainment date of July 20, 2021. Under the 
Serious classification, the major source threshold is 50 tpy or more of 
VOC. In the action reclassifying DFW to Serious, EPA set a deadline of 
August 3, 2021, for Texas to provide a demonstration that RACT was in 
place as necessary to meet the Serious area requirements.
    On May 12, 2020, Texas submitted to EPA a SIP revision to 30 TAC 
Chapter 115 to implement major source RACT requirements for VOC 
associated with the Serious classification for the 2008 ozone NAAQS for 
the DFW area. On May 13, 2020, Texas submitted a SIP revision that 
includes an analysis that Serious level RACT for sources of VOC 
emissions in the DFW area is met for the 2008 8-hr ozone NAAQS. In its 
RACT analysis, to identify major stationary sources of VOC, Texas 
reviewed the TCEQ 2017 point source emissions inventory, the TCEQ New 
Source Review, and CAA Title V databases to locate potential 
sources.\4\ All sources in the Title V database that were listed as a 
major source for VOC emissions and have the potential to emit 50 tons 
per year or more are included in the RACT analysis. TCEQ noted that 
they reviewed sources that reported actual emissions as low as 25 tpy 
of VOC to account for the difference between actual and potential 
emissions. TCEQ also noted that sites from the emissions inventory 
database with emissions equal to or greater than a threshold of 25 tpy 
or more of VOC that were not identified in the Title V database and 
could not be verified as minor sources by other means are also included 
in the RACT analysis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Appendix F, Reasonably Available Control Technology 
Analysis, of the state's SIP submittal, available at <a href="https://www.tceq.texas.gov/assets/public/implementation/air/sip/dfw/dfw_ad_sip_2019/DFWAD_19078SIP_Appendix_F_Final.pdf">https://www.tceq.texas.gov/assets/public/implementation/air/sip/dfw/dfw_ad_sip_2019/DFWAD_19078SIP_Appendix_F_Final.pdf</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Evaluation

    States should refer to existing CTG and ACT documents, all relevant 
information received during the public comment period, and any other 
information that is current at the time of development of the SIP to 
determine if RACT is being applied. See 80 FR 12264, 12278 (March 6, 
2015). States may conclude, in some cases, that sources already 
addressed by RACT determinations to meet the 1-hour and/or the 1997 8-
hour ozone NAAQS do not need to implement additional controls to meet 
the 2008 ozone NAAQS RACT requirement. Id. at 11278-9.
    The EPA has previously determined that Chapter 115 VOC regulations 
for the DFW area have met RACT for requirements associated with past 
ozone NAAQS for all CTG and non-CTG major sources in the DFW area--
including the 1-hour and 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS \5\ and later, the 
2008 Moderate NAAQS area classification \6\ and incorporated them into 
the Texas SIP. Texas' May 13, 2020, submittal demonstrates how the 
Chapter 115 rules also satisfy RACT requirements for CTG and non-CTG 
VOC major sources for the 2008 8-hour Serious classification for the 
entire DFW area.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 58 FR, 44124, September 24, 1992; 59 FR 60709, November 28, 
1994; 60 FR 12438, March 7, 1995; 61 FR 55894, October 30, 1996; 64 
FR 3841, January 26, 1999; 64 FR 12759, March 15, 1999; 65 FR 79745, 
December 26, 2000; 66 FR 54688, October 30, 2001; 74 FR 1903, 
January 14, 2009; 79 FR 45105, August 4, 2014; and 80 FR 16291, 
March 27, 2015.
    \6\ 82 FR 60546 (December 21, 2017); 84 FR 5601 (February 22, 
2019).
    \7\ See EPA-R06-OAR-2005-TX-0018, EPA-R06-OAR-2012-0100 and EPA-
R06-OAR-2017-0055, available through the <a href="http://Regulations.gov">Regulations.gov</a> website at: 
<a href="https://www.regulations.gov/">https://www.regulations.gov/</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The EPA performed a VOC RACT analysis which compares Texas' CTG and 
non-CTG categorical RACT rules to other relevant state rules. This 
analysis may be found in the technical support document (TSD) for this 
proposed action, which is available in the public docket for this 
action. The analysis in the TSD also includes a search and comparison 
of EPA's RACT/BACT/LAER Clearinghouse (RBLC),\8\ New Source Performance 
Standards, Maximum Achievable Control Technology, and National 
Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, where applicable. The 
EPA has not identified any new control technologies that are reasonably 
available considering technological and economic feasibility for these 
sources. Based upon our findings, EPA proposes to determine that Texas 
Chapter 115 rules, as revised in the May 12, 2020, submittal, continue 
to represent RACT.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See <a href="https://www.epa.gov/catc/ractbactlaer-clearinghouse-rblc-basic-information">https://www.epa.gov/catc/ractbactlaer-clearinghouse-rblc-basic-information</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We are proposing to find that the Chapter 115 rules, which the 
State amended in its May 12, 2020, submittal to apply the 50 tpy 
threshold to Wise County, meet RACT for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS in 
the ten county DFW Moderate nonattainment area. We have determined this 
is appropriate because the analysis in the TSD shows that the Texas 
rules are representative of the control technologies reasonably 
available at the time the SIP submission was developed. The Chapter 115 
rules provide appropriate VOC emissions controls that are equivalent to 
control options cited in the CTG documents, and any non-CTG major 
sources are appropriately controlled. In addition, EPA conducted a 
state comparison analysis, which can be found in the

[[Page 42887]]

TSD, where it compared Texas' RACT rules to other relevant state rules. 
As explained further in the TSD, EPA found Texas' rules to be 
consistent with similar rules adopted by other states. The EPA has not 
identified any new control technologies that are reasonably available 
considering technological and economic feasibility for the Texas 
sources. As a result of EPA's analysis, EPA is proposing to determine 
that the Texas VOC RACT regulations are still representative of RACT 
for the DFW nonattainment area for purposes of the Serious 
classification for the 2008 ozone standard.

VOC RACT Negative Declarations

    States are not required to adopt RACT limits for categories of 
sources covered by a CTG for which no sources exist in a nonattainment 
area and can submit a negative declaration to that effect. The negative 
declaration should state that there are no CTG-covered sources in the 
area and provide an accompanying analysis to support that conclusion. 
Texas reviewed its emission inventory and determined that its previous 
negative declarations for fiberglass boat manufacturing materials, 
surface coating for flat wood paneling, letterpress printing, 
shipbuilding and ship repair surface coating operations, vegetable oil 
manufacturing, and rubber tire manufacturing categories are still 
applicable.\9\ Texas also submitted negative declarations for graphic 
arts--rotogravure and flexography, flexible package printing, refinery 
vacuum producing systems and process unit turnarounds, wood furniture 
manufacturing, and manufacture of synthesized pharmaceutical products 
for Wise County only. Negative declarations are discussed further in 
the TSD. The EPA proposes to approve these negative declarations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Submitted as part of its DFW VOC RACT SIP for the 1997 8-
hour ozone NAAQS. See 79 FR 21144 (April 15, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In Texas' May 13, 2020 submission, Table F-3 of Appendix F, ``State 
Rules Addressing VOC RACT Requirements in ACT Reference Documents'' 
provides a listing of eighteen different categories of source types for 
which a VOC Alternate Control Technology document has been issued, the 
State's determination of how the technologies in the ACT have been 
addressed, and whether or not such a source is currently located in the 
DFW area.
    We propose that RACT is in place for affected sources of VOC 
emissions and that the existing controls requirements continue to 
represent RACT for the DFW area.

III. Proposed Action

    The EPA is proposing to determine that the SIP revisions submitted 
by TCEQ on May 13, 2020, fulfill the Serious VOC RACT requirements for 
the DFW nonattainment area for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. The EPA is also 
proposing to approve the concurrent 30 TAC Chapter 115 rule revisions, 
specifically revisions to sections 115.10, 115.111, 115.112, 115.119, 
115.421, submitted by TCEQ on May 12, 2020, and the negative 
declarations made for the CTGs listed in section II of this document. 
The Texas regulations in 30 TAC Chapter 115 implement major source RACT 
requirements for VOC associated with the Serious classification for the 
2008 ozone NAAQS. With that approval, EPA would incorporate the 
approved revisions by reference into the SIP.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this action, the EPA is proposing to include in a final rule 
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance 
with the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to 
incorporate by reference revisions to the Texas regulations as 
described in sections II and III of this preamble. The EPA has made, 
and will continue to make, these documents generally available 
electronically through <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a> and in hard copy at the EPA 
Region 6 office.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a 
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act 
and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal 
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those 
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
    <bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review 
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
    <bullet> Is not subject to Executive Order 14192 (90 FR 9065, 
February 6, 2025) because SIP actions are exempt from review under 
Executive Order 12866;
    <bullet> Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
    <bullet> Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
    <bullet> Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
    <bullet> Does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
    <bullet> Is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, 
April 23, 1997) because it approves a state program;
    <bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
    <bullet> Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the Clean Air Act.
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian Tribe has 
demonstrated that a Tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 
country, the rule does not have Tribal implications and will not impose 
substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law as 
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.)

    Dated: August 26, 2025.
Walter Mason,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2025-17081 Filed 9-4-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on September 5, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.