Notice2025-16965

Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
September 4, 2025

Issuing agencies

Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. and I.N.G.E.T.E.K.N.O.S. Estructurales, S.A. de C.V. (collectively, Deacero Group); and TA 2000 S.A. de C.V. (TA 2000) sold steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from Mexico in the United States at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), November 1, 2022, through October 31, 2023.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 169 (Thursday, September 4, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 169 (Thursday, September 4, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42740-42743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-16965]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-201-844]


Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Mexico: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that 
Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. and I.N.G.E.T.E.K.N.O.S. Estructurales, S.A. 
de C.V. (collectively, Deacero Group); and TA 2000 S.A. de C.V. (TA 
2000) sold steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from Mexico in the 
United States at less than normal value during the period of review 
(POR), November 1, 2022, through October 31, 2023.

[[Page 42741]]


DATES: Applicable September 4, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle Clahane or T.J. Worthington, AD/
CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5449 or (202) 
482-4567, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On December 2, 2024, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of 
this review in the Federal Register and invited interested parties to 
comment on those results.\1\ On December 9, 2024, Commerce tolled the 
deadline for these final results by 90 days.\2\ From February 24 
through February 28, 2025, Commerce conducted verification of Deacero 
Group's questionnaire responses.\3\ On June 2, 2025, Commerce extended 
the deadline for these final results to July 30, 2025.\4\ On June 30, 
2025, Commerce further extended the deadline for these final results to 
August 29, 2025.\5\ On July 24, 2025, Commerce issued a post-
preliminary differential pricing analysis.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico: Preliminary 
Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2022-2023, 89 FR 95176 (December 2, 2024) (Preliminary 
Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings,'' dated December 9, 2024.
    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Verification of Deacero Group's Sales 
Responses,'' dated April 15, 2025.
    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for the Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated June 2, 
2025.
    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Second Extension of Deadline for the Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023,'' 
dated June 30, 2025.
    \6\ See Memorandum, ``Post-Preliminary Analysis for the 
Administrative Review of Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from 
Mexico,'' dated July 24, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For a complete summary of the events that occurred since Commerce 
published the Preliminary Results, as well as a full discussion of the 
issues raised by parties for these final results, see the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.\7\ Commerce conducted this administrative review 
in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Steel 
Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico; 2022-2023,'' dated 
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and 
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Successor-In-Interest Determination

    Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216(d), 
when Commerce receives information concerning, or a request from an 
interested party for a review of, an order which shows changed 
circumstances sufficient to warrant a review of such order after 
publishing notice of the review in the Federal Register, Commerce shall 
conduct a review of the determination based on those changed 
circumstances. While successor-in-interest determinations are often 
made in the context of distinct changed circumstance reviews to 
consider the applicability of cash deposit rates after there have been 
changes in the name or the structure of a respondent, such as a merger 
or spinoff (successor-in-interest, or successorship, determinations), 
Commerce has also made successor-in-interest determinations in the 
context of administrative reviews and investigations.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the People's 
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018-2019, 85 FR 
83891 (December 23, 2020), and accompanying Issues and Decision 
Memorandum at Comment 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In this review, TA 2000 identified that it was formerly named 
Talleres y Aceros S.A. de C.V. (Talleres y Aceros) and made a legal 
name change through a merger in which TA 2000 S.A. de C.V. became the 
revised name of the legal entity and provided information necessary to 
evaluate the statements in support of the successorship claim within 
the context of Commerce's established criteria.\9\ In the Preliminary 
Results, Commerce found that, based on the totality of the 
circumstances and in the absence of any contradictory information on 
the record, TA 2000 is the successor-in-interest to Talleres y Aceros, 
as the change in the company's name was not accompanied by significant 
changes to its management and operations, production facilities, 
supplier relationships, and/or customer base.\10\ Thus, we 
preliminarily concluded that TA 2000 operates as essentially the same 
business entity as Talleres y Aceros, that TA 2000 is the successor-in-
interest to Talleres y Aceros, and that TA 2000 should receive the same 
antidumping duty (AD) cash deposit rate and customs number as its 
predecessor, with respect to subject merchandise.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See TA 2000's Letter, ``Supplemental Response,'' dated 
September 23, 2024.
    \10\ See Preliminary Results, 89 FR at 95177, and accompanying 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 5-6.
    \11\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    No party commented on this determination, and Commerce received no 
subsequent information or argument to compel reconsideration thereof. 
Therefore, we continue to find TA 2000 to be the successor-in-interest 
to Talleres y Aceros and that TA 2000 should receive the same AD cash 
deposit rate and customs number as its predecessor.

Scope of the Order <SUP>12</SUP>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico: Antidumping 
Duty Order, 79 FR 65925 (November 6, 2014) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The product covered by this Order is rebar from Mexico. For a 
complete description of the scope, see the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues that parties 
raised and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum 
is attached as the appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision 
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, a complete 
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly 
at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on our review of the record and comments received from 
interested parties regarding the Preliminary Results, we made certain 
changes to the margin calculation for Deacero Group. In addition, 
Commerce has relied on partial adverse facts available under sections 
776(a) and (b) of the Act for Deacero Group. For a discussion of these 
changes, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. We made no changes to 
the margin calculation for TA 2000.

Final Results of Review

    Commerce determines that the following weighted-average dumping 
margins exist for the period November 1, 2022, through October 31, 
2023:

[[Page 42742]]



------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                    Producer or exporter                        dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V./I.N.G.E.T.E.K.N.O.S. Estructurales        32.05
 S.A........................................................
TA 2000 S.A. de C.V.\13\....................................       22.27
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ As discussed above in the ``Final Successor-in-Interest 
Determination'' section, we determine that TA 2000 is the successor-
in-interest to Talleres y Aceros S.A. de C.V. Accordingly, we intend 
to issue assessment instructions covering applicable entries 
produced and exported by Talleres y Aceros S.A. de C.V. during the 
POR at the rate established in these final results for TA 2000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With respect to Deacero Group, Commerce intends to disclose to 
interested parties the calculations performed for these final results 
in this review within five days of the date of publication of this 
notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
    With respect to TA 2000, there are no new calculations to disclose 
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b) for these final results.

Assessment Rate

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1), Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries covered by this review. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), where 
the respondent reported the entered value of its U.S. sales, we 
calculated importer-specific AD assessment rates by aggregating the 
total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales of each 
importer and dividing each of these amounts by the total entered value 
associated with those sales. Where the respondent did not report 
entered value, we calculated a per-unit assessment rate for each 
importer by dividing the total amount of dumping calculated for the 
examined sales made to that importer by the total quantity associated 
with those sales. To determine whether an importer-specific, per-unit 
assessment rate is de minimis, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), 
we also calculated an importer-specific ad valorem ratio based on 
estimated entered values. Where either the respondent's weighted-
average dumping margin is zero or de minimis within the meaning of 19 
CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or 
de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries 
without regard to antidumping duties.
    Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' will apply to entries of 
subject merchandise during the POR produced by the mandatory 
respondents for which the companies did not know that the merchandise 
they sold to an intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading company, or 
exporter) was destined for the United States. In such instances, we 
will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others 
rate established in the original less-than-fair value (LTFV) 
investigation, i.e., 20.58 percent,\14\ if there is no rate for the 
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Order 79 FR at 65926.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier 
than 41 days after the date of publication of the final results of this 
review in the Federal Register in accordance with 19 CFR 356.8(a).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rates for the companies 
identified above in the ``Final Results of Review'' section will be 
equal to the company-specific weighted-average dumping margin 
established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for 
merchandise exported by a company not covered in this administrative 
review but covered in a completed prior segment of the proceeding, the 
cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate 
published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; 
(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review or completed 
prior segment of this proceeding but the producer is, the cash deposit 
rate will be the company-specific rate established for the most 
recently-completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the 
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 
producers or exporters will continue to be 20.58 percent, the rate 
established in the LTFV investigation.\15\ These cash deposit 
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further 
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Order 79 FR at 65926.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement 
of antidumping duties has occurred and the subsequent assessment of 
double antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order (APO)

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to 
an APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of 
proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary 
information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or 
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure 
to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a 
sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5) 
and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1).

    Dated: August 29, 2025.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Differential Pricing Analysis
VI. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Whether to Apply Total Adverse Facts Available (AFA) 
to Deacero Group
    Comment 2: Whether to Apply Partial AFA to Deacero Group's 
Indirect Selling Expenses in the Home Market and the U.S. Market
    Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Apply AFA with Respect to 
Deacero Group's Fright Expenses in the Home Market
    Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should Apply AFA with Respect to 
Deacero Group's Fright Expenses in the U.S. Market
    Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should Increase Deacero Group's Cost 
of Production to Include Certain Costs
    Comment 6: Whether to Revise Commerce's Treatment of Reported 
Insurance Revenue and Warranty Expenses

[[Page 42743]]

    Comment 7: Whether to Revise Commerce's Treatment of Certain 
Credit Expenses
    Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should Revise the Cost Adjustment 
Calculated for Affiliate Scrap Purchases and the Calculation of 
General and Administrative (G&A) and Interest Expenses
    Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should Revise the Application of 
Short-Term Interest Rates
    Comment 10: Whether the Statute Requires Zeroing
    Comment 11: Whether Commerce Should Apply the Cohen's d Test and 
Whether the Differential Pricing Methodology Complies with the 
Statute
VII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2025-16965 Filed 9-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on September 4, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.