Notice2025-16612
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
August 29, 2025
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV) for the period of investigation (POI) January 1, 2024, through June 30, 2024.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 166 (Friday, August 29, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 166 (Friday, August 29, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42223-42226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-16612]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-552-843]
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) from the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) are being, or are likely to be, sold in
the United States at less than fair value (LTFV) for the period of
investigation (POI) January 1, 2024, through June 30, 2024.
DATES: Applicable August 29, 2025.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacob Waddell, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1369.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 10, 2025, Commerce published in the Federal Register its
preliminary affirmative determination in the LTFV investigation of CORE
from Vietnam, in which we also postponed the final determination until
August 25, 2025, and invited interested parties to comment on the
Preliminary Determination.\1\ On May 29, 2025, Commerce published its
Amended Preliminary Determination.\2\ On July 17, 2025, Commerce issued
a post-preliminary analysis memorandum in which we made certain changes
to our differential pricing analysis.\3\ We invited interested parties
to comment on changes to the differential pricing analysis.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Affirmative Determination
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of Final
Determination, and Extension of Provisional Measures, 90 FR 15343
(April 10, 2025) (Preliminary Determination), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
\2\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Amended Preliminary Determination of
Sales at Less than Fair Value, 90 FR 22690 (May 29, 2025) (Amended
Preliminary Determination).
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Post
Preliminary Affirmative Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value
Investigation of Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam,'' dated July 16, 2025 (Post-
Preliminary Analysis).
\4\ See Preliminary Determination, 90 FR 15354; see also
Memorandum, ``Briefing Schedule for the Post-Preliminary
Determination,'' dated July 17, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A summary of the events that occurred since the Preliminary
Determination, as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by
parties for this final determination, may be found in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.\5\ The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at <a href="http://access.trade.gov">http://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value in
the Investigation of Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from
the Socialist Republic of Vietnam,'' dated concurrently with, and
hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this investigation is CORE from Vietnam. For
a complete description of the scope of this investigation, see Appendix
I.
Scope Comments
In the Preliminary Scope Memorandum, we set aside a period of time
for parties to raise issues regarding product coverage (i.e., scope) in
scope-specific case briefs or other written comments.\6\ We received
scope case and rebuttal briefs from multiple interested parties. For a
summary of the product coverage comments and rebuttal response
submitted to the record for this final determination, and accompanying
discussion and analysis of all comments timely received, see the Final
Scope Memorandum.\7\ In the Final Scope Memorandum, Commerce made no
changes to the scope language as it appeared in the Initiation Notice.
See Appendix I.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Memorandum, ``Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations of
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Australia, Brazil,
Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, South Africa, Taiwan, the Republic
of T[uuml]rkiye, the United Arab Emirates, and the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam, and Countervailing Duty Investigations of
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Brazil, Canada,
Mexico, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Scope
Decision Memorandum,'' dated April 3, 2025 (Preliminary Scope
Memorandum).
\7\ See Memorandum, ``Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations of
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Australia, Brazil,
Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, South Africa, Taiwan, the Republic
of T[uuml]rkiye, the United Arab Emirates, and the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam, and Countervailing Duty Investigations of
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Brazil, Canada,
Mexico, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Scope Decision
Memorandum,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Final Scope
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Verification
Commerce conducted verification of the information relied upon in
making its final determination in this investigation, in accordance
with section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Specifically, we conducted on-site verifications of the sales and cost
information submitted by Hoa Sen Group (HSG) and Ton Dong A Corporation
(TDA), for use in our final determination.\8\ We used standard
verification procedures, including an examination of relevant sales and
accounting records, and original source documents provided by HSG and
TDA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Memoranda, ``Verification of Hoa Sen Group,'' dated June
30, 2025, and ``Verification of Sales Response of Ton Dong A
Corporation,'' dated June 30, 2025; ``Verification of CEP Sales
Response of Ton Dong A Corporation,'' dated June 30, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs submitted by
interested parties in this investigation are addressed in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues addressed in the Issues
and Decision
[[Page 42224]]
Memorandum is attached to this notice as Appendix II.
Changes Since the Preliminary Determination
We made certain changes to the margin calculations for HSG and TDA
since the Preliminary Determination, Amended Preliminary Determination,
and Post-Preliminary Analysis. For a discussion of these changes, see
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Use of Adverse Facts Available (AFA)
As discussed in the Preliminary Determination, Commerce assigned an
estimated weighted-average dumping margin on the basis of AFA, pursuant
to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act, to the Vietnam-wide entity
(including, but not limited to, 12 companies which did not rebut the
presumption of government control).\9\ No party commented on our
findings with respect to the Vietnam-wide entity and use of the highest
corroborated dumping margin alleged in the petition as the appropriate
rate assigned to the Vietnam-wide entity. Therefore, Commerce continues
to find, pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act, that the use
of facts otherwise available, with adverse inferences, is warranted in
determining the dumping rate for the Vietnam-wide entity, and we
continue to assign the highest transaction-specific dumping margin
calculated for the mandatory respondents (i.e., 162.96 percent).\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Preliminary Determination, 90 FR at 15344.
\10\ See Memorandum, ``Final Analysis Memorandum for Ton Dong A
Corporation,'' at Attachment 2 and Attachment 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Separate Rates
On July 7 and 9, 2025, interested parties commented on Commerce's
preliminary separate rate determinations.\11\ We have reconsidered our
methodology for calculating the separate rate in this investigation,
which we have addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. We have
not made any changes regarding our determination of companies eligible
to receive a separate rate. Accordingly, we continue to find that HSG
and TDA, and certain non-individually examined companies that are
listed in the ``Final Determination'' rate table below, are eligible
for a separate rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Government of Vietnam's Letter, ``Case Brief,'' dated
July 7, 2025; see also Hoa Phat Group JSC, Hoa Phat Steel Sheet LLC,
Southern Steel Sheet Co., Ltd., Pomina Flat Steel JSC, TVP Steel
JSC, TVP Steel Trading JSC, Sam Hwan Vina CO., Ltd.'s Letter, ``Case
Brief,'' dated July 9, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Combination Rates
Consistent with the Preliminary Determination and Policy Bulletin
05.1,\12\ Commerce calculated combination rates for the companies
eligible for a separate rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Enforcement and Compliance's Policy Bulletin No. 05.1,
regarding, ``Separate-Rates Practice and Application of Combination
Rates in Antidumping Investigations involving Non-Market Economy
Countries,'' dated April 5, 2005 (Policy Bulletin 05.1), available
on Commerce's website at <a href="http://enforcement.trade.gov/policy/bull05-1.pdf">http://enforcement.trade.gov/policy/bull05-1.pdf</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Determination
Commerce determines that the following estimated weighted-average
dumping margins exist:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Commerce calculated a de minimis rate for HSG in the
companion countervailing duty (CVD) investigation. Therefore, no CVD
offset/adjustment is being made to HSG's cash deposit rate.
\14\ TDA received a final net subsidy rate in the companion CVD
investigation; however, none of the countervailable subsidies were
export-contingent. Therefore, no CVD offset/adjustment is being made
to TDA's cash deposit rate.
\15\ Because neither HSG nor TDA's estimated dumping margin is
being offset by export-contingent CVD subsidies, no CVD offset
adjustment has been made to the cash deposit rate of the separate
rate companies or the Vietnam-Wide Entity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash deposit rate
Weighted-average (adjusted for
Producer Exporter dumping margin export subsidy
(percent) offset) (percent)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hoa Sen Group/Hoa Sen Nghe An One Member Hoa Sen Group/Hoa Sen Nghe 110.19 \13\ 110.19
Limited Liabilities Company/Hoa Sen Nhon An One Member Limited
Hoi--Binh Dinh One Member Limited Liabilities Company/Hoa Sen
Liabilities Company. Nhon Hoi--Binh Dinh One
Member Limited Liabilities
Company.
Ton Dong A Corporation................... Ton Dong A Corporation...... 87.07 \14\ 87.07
China Steel and Nippon Steel Viet Nam China Steel and Nippon Steel 94.89 \15\ 94.89
Joint Stock Company. Viet Nam Joint Stock
Company.
Hoa Phat Steel Sheet Limited Liability Hoa Phat Steel Sheet Limited 94.89 94.89
Company. Liability Company.
Maruichi Sun Steel Joint Stock Company... Maruichi Sun Steel Joint 94.89 94.89
Stock Company.
Nam Kim Steel Joint Stock Company........ Nam Kim Steel Joint Stock 94.89 94.89
Company.
Pomina Flat Steel Joint Stock Company.... Pomina Flat Steel Joint 94.89 94.89
Stock Company.
Sam Hwan Vina Co., Ltd................... Sam Hwan Vina Co., Ltd...... 94.89 94.89
Southern Steel Sheet Co., Ltd............ Southern Steel Sheet Co., 94.89 94.89
Ltd.
Tay Nam Steel Manufacturing & Trading Tay Nam Steel Manufacturing 94.89 94.89
Co., Ltd. & Trading Co., Ltd.
TVP Steel Trading Joint Stock Company.... TVP Steel Trading Joint 94.89 94.89
Stock Company.
Viet Phap Steel Corrugated Joint Stock Viet Phap Steel Corrugated 94.89 94.89
Company. Joint Stock Company.
Vietnam-Wide Entity...................... ............................ * 162.96 162.96
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* This rate is based on facts available with adverse inferences.
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose the calculations performed in
connection with this final determination to interested parties within
five days after public announcement or, if there is no public
announcement, within five days of the date of publication of this
notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation
In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, we will
instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue to
suspend liquidation of subject merchandise entries, as described in
Appendix I of this notice, which are entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after April 10, 2025, the date of
publication of the Preliminary Determination in the Federal Register.
[[Page 42225]]
Pursuant to section 735(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.210(d), Commerce will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit equal
to the amount by which the normal value exceeds the U.S. price as
follows: (1) the cash deposit rate for the exporter/producer
combination listed in the table above will be the rate identified in
the table; (2) for all combination of Vietnamese exporters/producers of
subject merchandise that have not received their own separate rate
above, the cash deposit rate will be the cash deposit rate established
for the Vietnam-wide entity; and (3) for all non-Vietnamese exporters
of subject merchandise which have not received their own separate rate
above, the cash deposit rate will be the cash deposit rate applicable
to the Vietnamese exporter/producer combination that supplied that non-
Vietnamese exporter. These suspension of liquidation instructions will
remain in effect until further notice.
To determine the cash deposit rate, Commerce normally adjusts the
estimated weighted-average dumping margin by the amount of export
subsidies countervailed in a companion countervailing duty (CVD)
investigation, when CVD provisional measures are in effect.
Accordingly, where Commerce made an affirmative determination for
countervailable export subsidies, Commerce would offset the estimated
weighted-average dumping margins by the appropriate export subsidy
rate.\16\ Any such adjusted cash deposit rates may be found in the
``Final Determination'' section above. However, the suspension of
liquidation of provisional measures in the companion CVD investigation
has been discontinued.\17\ Therefore, we are not instructing CBP to
collect cash deposits based upon the adjusted estimated weighted-
average dumping margins for export subsidies at this time. If the U.S.
International Trade Commission (ITC) makes a final affirmative
determination of injury due to both dumping and subsidies, then the
cash deposit rate will be revised effective on the date of publication
of the ITC's final affirmative determination in the Federal Register to
be the company-specific estimated weighted-average dumping margin
adjusted for export subsidies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Preliminary Determination PDM at 31-32.
\17\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determination, and Alignment of Final
Determination With Antidumping Duty Determination, 90 FR 9235
(February 10, 2025); see also section 703(d) of the Act, which
states that the provisional measures may not be in effect for more
than four months, which in the companion CVD case is 120 days after
the publication of the preliminary determination, or June 9, 2025
(i.e., last day provisional measures are in effect).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC)
In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, Commerce will notify
the ITC of its final affirmative determination of sales at LTFV.
Because Commerce's final determination is affirmative, in accordance
with section 735(b)(2) of the Act, the ITC will make its final
determination as to whether the domestic industry in the United States
is materially injured, or threatened with material injury, by reason of
imports of CORE no later than 45 days after this final determination.
If the ITC determines that material injury or threat of material injury
does not exist, the proceeding will be terminated and all cash deposits
will be refunded or canceled, and suspension of liquidation will be
lifted. If the ITC determines that such injury does exist, Commerce
will issue an antidumping duty order directing CBP to assess, upon
further instructions by Commerce, antidumping duties on all imports of
the subject merchandise that are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the effective date of the suspension of
liquidation, as discussed above in the ``Continuation of Suspension of
Liquidation'' section above.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
This determination is issued and published in accordance with
sections 735(d) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.210(c).
Dated: August 25, 2025.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigation
The products covered by this investigation are certain flat-
rolled steel products, either clad, plated, or coated with
corrosion-resistant metals such as zinc, aluminum, or zinc-,
aluminum-, nickel- or iron-based alloys, whether or not corrugated
or painted, varnished, laminated, or coated with plastics or other
non-metallic substances in addition to the metallic coating. The
products covered include coils that have a width of 12.7 mm or
greater, regardless of form of coil (e.g., in successively
superimposed layers, spirally oscillating, etc.). The products
covered also include products not in coils (e.g., in straight
lengths) of a thickness less than 4.75 mm and a width that is 12.7
mm or greater and that measures at least 10 times the thickness. The
products covered also include products not in coils (e.g., in
straight lengths) of a thickness of 4.75 mm or more and a width
exceeding 150 mm and measuring at least twice the thickness. The
products described above may be rectangular, square, circular, or
other shape and include products of either rectangular or non-
rectangular cross-section where such cross-section is achieved
subsequent to the rolling process, i.e., products which have been
``worked after rolling'' (e.g., products which have been beveled or
rounded at the edges).
For purposes of the width and thickness requirements referenced
above:
(1) Where the nominal and actual measurements vary, a product is
within the scope if application of either the nominal or actual
measurement would place it within the scope based on the definitions
set forth above, and
(2) where the width and thickness vary for a specific product
(e.g., the thickness of certain products with non-rectangular cross-
section, the width of certain products with non-rectangular shape,
etc.), the measurement at its greatest width or thickness applies.
Steel products included in the scope of these investigations are
products in which: (1) iron predominates, by weight, over each of
the other contained elements; and (2) the carbon content is 2
percent or less, by weight.
Subject merchandise also includes corrosion-resistant steel that
has been further processed in a third country, including but not
limited to annealing, tempering, painting, varnishing, trimming,
cutting, punching and/or slitting or any other processing that would
not otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of the
investigations if performed in the country of manufacture of the in-
scope corrosion resistant steel.
All products that meet the written physical description are
within the scope of these investigations unless specifically
excluded. The following products are outside of and/or specifically
excluded from the scope of this investigation:
<bullet> Flat-rolled steel products either plated or coated with
tin, lead, chromium, chromium oxides, both tin and lead (``terne
plate'') or both chromium and chromium oxides (``tin free steel''),
whether or not painted, varnished or coated with plastics or other
non-metallic substances in addition to the metallic coating;
<bullet> Clad products in straight lengths of 4.7625 mm or more
in composite thickness and of a width which exceeds 150 mm and
measures at least twice the thickness;
<bullet> Certain clad stainless flat-rolled products, which are
three-layered corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat-rolled products
less
[[Page 42226]]
than 4.75 mm in composite thickness that consist of a carbon steel
flat-rolled product clad on both sides with stainless steel in a
20%-60%-20% ratio; and
Also excluded from the scope of the antidumping duty
investigation on corrosion resistant steel from Taiwan are any
products covered by the existing antidumping duty order on
corrosion-resistant steel from Taiwan. See Certain Corrosion-
Resistant Steel Products from India, Italy, the People's Republic of
China, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan: Amended Final Affirmative
Antidumping Determination for India and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty
Orders, 81FR 48390 (July 25, 2016); Corrosion-Resistant Steel
Products from Taiwan: Notice of Third Amended Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value Pursuant to Court Decision and Partial
Exclusion from Antidumping Duty Order, 88 FR 58245 (August 25,
2023).
Also excluded from the scope of the antidumping duty
investigation on corrosion-resistant steel from the United Arab
Emirates and the antidumping duty and countervailing duty
investigations on corrosion-resistant steel from the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam are any products covered by the existing
antidumping and countervailing duty orders on corrosion-resistant
steel from the People's Republic of China and the Republic of Korea
and the antidumping duty order on corrosion-resistant steel from
Taiwan. See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from India,
Italy, the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea and
Taiwan: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Determination for
India and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 48390 (July 25,
2016); see also Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from
India, Italy, Republic of Korea and the People's Republic of China:
Countervailing Duty Order, 81 FR 48387 (July 25, 2016). This
exclusion does not apply to imports of corrosion-resistant steel
that are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption in
the United States for which the relevant importer and exporter
certifications have been completed and maintained and all other
applicable certification requirements have been met such that the
entry is entered into the United States as not subject to the
antidumping and countervailing duty orders on corrosion-resistant
steel from the People's Republic of China, the antidumping and
countervailing duty orders on corrosion-resistant steel from the
Republic of Korea, or the antidumping duty order on corrosion-
resistant steel from Taiwan.
The products subject to the investigation are currently
classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) under item numbers: 7210.30.0030, 7210.30.0060,
7210.41.0000, 7210.49.0030, 7210.49.0040, 7210.49.0045,
7210.49.0091, 7210.49.0095, 7210.61.0000, 7210.69.0000,
7210.70.6030, 7210.70.6060, 7210.70.6090, 7210.90.6000,
7210.90.9000, 7212.20.0000, 7212.30.1030, 7212.30.1090,
7212.30.3000, 7212.30.5000, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000,
7212.50.0000, 7212.60.0000, 7225.91.0000, 7225.92.0000,
7226.99.0110, and 7226.99.0130.
The products subject to the investigation may also enter under
the following HTSUS item numbers: 7210.90.1000, 7215.90.1000,
7215.90.3000, 7215.90.5000, 7217.20.1500, 7217.30.1530,
7217.30.1560, 7217.90.1000, 7217.90.5030, 7217.90.5060,
7217.90.5090, 7225.99.0090, 7226.99.0180, 7228.60.6000,
7228.60.8000, and 7229.90.1000.
The HTSUS subheadings above are provided for convenience and
customs purposes only. The written description of the scope of the
investigation is dispositive.
Appendix II
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Changes Since the Preliminary Determination
IV. Application of Facts Available (AFA) and Use of Adverse
Inference
V. Discussion of the Issues
Comments Relating to HSG:
Comment 1: Applying AFA to HSG's Consumption of Demineralized
Water
Comment 2: Applying AFA to Factors of Production Information
Concerning a Certain Number of HSG's Reported Control Numbers
Comment 3: Inclusion of Alloy Hot-Rolled Coil in HSG's Normal
Value Calculation
Comment 4: Calculation of Surrogate Value (SV) for Brokerage and
Handling Expenses
Comments Relating to TDA:
Comment 5: Assigning TDA a Dumping Margin Based Entirely on AFA
Comment 6: Correcting TDA's Misreported Ocean Freight Expenses
Comment 7: Subtracting Domestic Inland Insurance from TDA's
Starting U.S. Price
Comment 8: Application of AFA to a Certain Percentage of TDA's
HRC
Comment 9: Granting TDA a By-Product Offset
Comment 10: Valuing Certain of TDA's Input Purchases in Market
Economy Currency
Comment 11: Treatment of Packing Materials Involved TDA's Sales
of Ferrosoferric Oxide By Product
General Comments:
Comment 12: Application of Zeroing Methodology to HSG and TDA's
Margin Calculations
Comment 13: Calculating Freight Charges Based on Gross Weight
Comment 14: Selection of the Primary Surrogate Country
Comment 15: SVs for Water, Electricity, and Marine Insurance
Comment 16: SV for Ocean Freight
Comment 17: Rejection of Petitioners' SV Submissions as Unlawful
Comment 18: Calculation of the Separate Rate
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2025-16612 Filed 8-28-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on August 29, 2025.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.