Notice2025-16609

Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Taiwan: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
August 29, 2025

Issuing agencies

Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that imports of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) from Taiwan are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation is July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 166 (Friday, August 29, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 166 (Friday, August 29, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42210-42213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-16609]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-583-878]


Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Taiwan: Final 
Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that 
imports of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) from 
Taiwan are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at 
less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation is July 1, 
2023, through June 30, 2024.

DATES: Applicable August 29, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Preston Cox, AD/CVD Operations, Office 
VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 
DC 20230; telephone: (240) 956-8630.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On April 10, 2025, Commerce published in the Federal Register its 
preliminary affirmative determination in the LTFV investigation of CORE 
from Taiwan, in which we also postponed the final determination until 
August 25, 2025 and invited interested parties to comment on the 
Preliminary Determination.\1\ On June 10, 2025, Commerce clarified that 
the deadlines for case briefs and rebuttal briefs would be established 
at a future date, notwithstanding the deadlines established in the 
Preliminary Determination.\2\ On July 23, 2025, Commerce issued a post-
preliminary analysis memorandum in which we: (1) preliminarily 
determined that both a cost-based particular market situation (PMS) and 
a sales-based PMS existed during the POI and (2) made certain changes 
to our differential pricing analysis.\3\ We invited interested parties 
to comment on the Preliminary Determination and the Post-Preliminary 
Analysis.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Taiwan: 
Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 
Value, Postponement of Final Determination, and Extension of 
Provisional Measures, 90 FR 15359 (April 10, 2025) (Preliminary 
Determination), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum 
(PDM).
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Clarification of the Deadlines,'' dated 
June 10, 2025.
    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Post-Preliminary Analysis for the Less-
Than-Fair-Value Investigation of Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel 
Products from Taiwan,'' dated July 23, 2025 (Post-Preliminary 
Memorandum).
    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Briefing Schedule,'' dated July 24, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A summary of the events that occurred since the Preliminary 
Determination, as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by 
parties for this final determination, may be found in the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.\5\ The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public 
document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Affirmative Determination in the Less Than Fair Value 
Investigation of Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from 
Taiwan,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Investigation

    The product covered by this investigation is CORE from Taiwan. For 
a complete description of the scope of this investigation, see Appendix 
I.

Scope Comments

    In the Preliminary Scope Memorandum, we set aside a period of time 
for parties to raise issues regarding product coverage (i.e., scope) in 
scope-

[[Page 42211]]

specific case briefs or other written comments.\6\ We received scope 
case and rebuttal briefs from multiple interested parties. For a 
summary of the product coverage comments and rebuttal response 
submitted to the record for this final determination, and accompanying 
discussion and analysis of all comments timely received, see the Final 
Scope Memorandum.\7\ In the Final Scope Memorandum, Commerce made no 
changes to the scope language as it appeared in the Initiation Notice. 
See Appendix I.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Memorandum, ``Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations of 
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Australia, Brazil, 
Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, South Africa, Taiwan, the Republic 
of T[uuml]rkiye, the United Arab Emirates, and the Socialist 
Republic of Vietnam, and Countervailing Duty Investigations of 
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Brazil, Canada, 
Mexico, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Scope 
Decision Memorandum,'' dated April 3, 2025 (Preliminary Scope 
Memorandum).
    \7\ See Memorandum, ``Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations of 
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Australia, Brazil, 
Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, South Africa, Taiwan, the Republic 
of T[uuml]rkiye, the United Arab Emirates, and the Socialist 
Republic of Vietnam, and Countervailing Duty Investigations of 
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Brazil, Canada, 
Mexico, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Scope Decision 
Memorandum,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Final Scope 
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Verification

    Commerce conducted verification of the information relied upon in 
making its final determination in this investigation, in accordance 
with section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 
Specifically, we conducted on-site verifications of the sales and cost 
information submitted by Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Yieh Phui) and 
Yieh Phui America, Inc. for use in our final determination. We used 
standard verification procedures, including an examination of relevant 
sales and accounting records, and original source documents provided by 
Yieh Phui and Yieh Phui America, Inc.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Memorandum, ``Verification of the Cost Response of Yieh 
Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd. in the Less Than Fair Value Investigation 
of Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Taiwan,'' dated May 27, 
2025; see also Memorandum, ``Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation of 
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Taiwan: Sales 
Verification Report for Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd. and Yieh Phui 
America Inc.,'' dated June 6, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs submitted by 
interested parties in this investigation are addressed in the Issues 
and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues addressed in the Issues 
and Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice as Appendix II.

Changes Since the Preliminary Determination

    Based on our review and analysis of the comments submitted in case 
briefs, we made no methodological changes to our final 
determination.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Although we made no methodological changes to our 
Preliminary Determination, we revised the AFA rate applied to non-
responsive companies. For this final determination, we applied the 
estimated dumping margin included in the Initiation Checklist as the 
AFA rate. See Initiation Checklist, ``Certain Corrosion-Resistant 
Steel Products from Taiwan,'' dated September 25, 2024 (Initiation 
Checklist); see also Petitioners' Letter, ``Response to Supplemental 
Questions on Petition,'' dated September 12, 2024, at Exhibit VIII-
SUPP-9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Use of Facts Available With Adverse Inferences

    For the purposes of this final determination, we find that, 
pursuant to section 776(a)(1) of the Act, the use of facts available 
with adverse inferences is warranted in determining the weighted-
average dumping margin for non-responsive companies. For further 
discussion of these issues, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

All-Others Rate

    Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that Commerce shall 
determine an estimated all-others rate for all exporters and producers 
not individually examined. This rate shall be equal to the weighted 
average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established 
for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any 
zero and de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely under 
section 776 of the Act.
    In this investigation, Commerce calculated an individual estimated 
weighted-average dumping margin for Yieh Phui, the only individually 
examined exporter/producer in this investigation, that is not zero, de 
minimis, or based entirely on facts otherwise available. Therefore, 
because the only individually calculated dumping margin is not zero, de 
minimis, or based entirely on facts otherwise available, the estimated 
weighted-average dumping margin calculated for Yieh Phui is the margin 
assigned to all other producers and exporters, pursuant to section 
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act.

Final Determination

    Commerce determines that the following estimated weighted-average 
dumping margins exist:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Weighted-average
                  Producer/exporter                      dumping margin
                                                           (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd........................              10.85
Sheng Yu Steel Co. Ltd...............................            * 67.81
Kounan Steel Co. Ltd.................................            * 67.81
Meglobe Co. Ltd......................................            * 67.81
All Others...........................................              10.85
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Rate is based on facts available with adverse inferences.

Disclosure

    Normally, Commerce discloses its calculations performed in 
connection with the final determination to interested parties within 
five days of any public announcement or, if there is no public 
announcement, within five days of the date of publication of this final 
determination in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.224(b). However, because Commerce has made no changes to its margin 
calculation for Yieh Phui since the Post-Preliminary Analysis, and 
there are no additional calculations performed in this final 
determination, there are no calculations to disclose.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Post-Preliminary Memorandum; see also Memorandum, 
``Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd. Post-Preliminary Sales Analysis 
Memorandum,'' dated July 23, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation

    In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, Commerce will 
instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue to 
suspend liquidation of entries of CORE, as described in Appendix I of 
this notice, which were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for 
consumption, on or after April 10, 2025, the date of publication of the 
Preliminary Determination in the Federal Register.
    Pursuant to section 735(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act and 735(c)(5)(A) of 
the Act, and 19 CFR 351.210(d), upon the publication of this notice, we 
will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit for estimated weighted-
average antidumping duties as follows: (1) the cash deposit rate for 
the companies listed in the table above that exported the subject 
merchandise will be equal to the company-specific estimated weighted-
average dumping margins determined in this final determination; (2) if 
the exporter is not a company identified in the table above, but the 
producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be equal to the company-
specific estimated weighted-average dumping margin established for that 
producer of the subject merchandise; and (3) the cash deposit rate for 
all other producers

[[Page 42212]]

and exporters will be equal to the estimated weighted-average dumping 
margin for all other producers and exporters. These suspension of 
liquidation instructions will remain in effect until further notice.

U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) Notification

    Because the final determination is affirmative, in accordance with 
section 735(b)(2) of the Act, the ITC will make its final determination 
as to whether the domestic industry in the United States is materially 
injured, or threatened with material injury, by reason of imports or 
sales (or the likelihood of sales) for importation of CORE from Taiwan 
no later than 45 days after this final determination. If the ITC 
determines that such injury does not exist, this proceeding will be 
terminated, all cash deposits posted will be refunded, and suspension 
of liquidation will be lifted. If the ITC determines that such injury 
does exist, Commerce will issue an antidumping duty order directing CBP 
to assess, upon further instruction by Commerce, antidumping duties on 
all imports of CORE from Taiwan entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the effective date of the suspension of 
liquidation, as discussed in the ``Continuation of Suspension of 
Liquidation'' section above.

Administrative Protective Order (APO)

    This notice will serve as a final reminder to parties subject to an 
APO of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary 
information disclosed under APO in accordance with accordance with 19 
CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or 
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order 
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the 
terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This determination is issued and published in accordance with 
sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.210(c).

    Dated: August 25, 2025.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I

Scope of the Investigation

    The products covered by this investigation are certain flat-
rolled steel products, either clad, plated, or coated with 
corrosion-resistant metals such as zinc, aluminum, or zinc-, 
aluminum-, nickel- or iron-based alloys, whether or not corrugated 
or painted, varnished, laminated, or coated with plastics or other 
non-metallic substances in addition to the metallic coating. The 
products covered include coils that have a width of 12.7 mm or 
greater, regardless of form of coil (e.g., in successively 
superimposed layers, spirally oscillating, etc.). The products 
covered also include products not in coils (e.g., in straight 
lengths) of a thickness less than 4.75 mm and a width that is 12.7 
mm or greater and that measures at least 10 times the thickness. The 
products covered also include products not in coils (e.g., in 
straight lengths) of a thickness of 4.75 mm or more and a width 
exceeding 150 mm and measuring at least twice the thickness. The 
products described above may be rectangular, square, circular, or 
other shape and include products of either rectangular or non-
rectangular cross-section where such cross-section is achieved 
subsequent to the rolling process, i.e., products which have been 
``worked after rolling'' (e.g., products which have been beveled or 
rounded at the edges).
    For purposes of the width and thickness requirements referenced 
above:
    (1) Where the nominal and actual measurements vary, a product is 
within the scope if application of either the nominal or actual 
measurement would place it within the scope based on the definitions 
set forth above, and
    (2) where the width and thickness vary for a specific product 
(e.g., the thickness of certain products with non-rectangular cross-
section, the width of certain products with non-rectangular shape, 
etc.), the measurement at its greatest width or thickness applies.
    Steel products included in the scope of this investigation are 
products in which: (1) iron predominates, by weight, over each of 
the other contained elements; and (2) the carbon content is 2 
percent or less, by weight.
    Subject merchandise also includes corrosion-resistant steel that 
has been further processed in a third country, including but not 
limited to annealing, tempering, painting, varnishing, trimming, 
cutting, punching and/or slitting or any other processing that would 
not otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of the 
investigation if performed in the country of manufacture of the in-
scope corrosion resistant steel.
    All products that meet the written physical description are 
within the scope of this investigation unless specifically excluded. 
The following products are outside of and/or specifically excluded 
from the scope of this investigation:
    <bullet> Flat-rolled steel products either plated or coated with 
tin, lead, chromium, chromium oxides, both tin and lead (``teme 
plate'') or both chromium and chromium oxides (``tin free steel''), 
whether or not painted, varnished or coated with plastics or other 
non-metallic substances in addition to the metallic coating;
    <bullet> Clad products in straight lengths of 4.7625 mm or more 
in composite thickness and of a width which exceeds 150 mm and 
measures at least twice the thickness;
    <bullet> Certain clad stainless flat-rolled products, which are 
three-layered corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat-rolled products 
less than 4.75 mm in composite thickness that consist of a carbon 
steel flat-rolled product clad on both sides with stainless steel in 
a 20%-60%-20% ratio; and
    Also excluded from the scope of the antidumping duty 
investigation on corrosion resistant steel from Taiwan are any 
products covered by the existing antidumping duty order on 
corrosion-resistant steel from Taiwan. See Certain Corrosion-
Resistant Steel Products from India, Italy, the People's Republic of 
China, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan: Amended Final Affirmative 
Antidumping Determination for India and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty 
Orders, 81FR 48390 (July 25, 2016); Corrosion-Resistant Steel 
Products from Taiwan: Notice of Third Amended Final Determination of 
Sales at Less Than Fair Value Pursuant to Court Decision and Partial 
Exclusion from Antidumping Duty Order, 88 FR 58245 (August 25, 
2023).
    The products subject to the investigation are currently 
classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(HTSUS) under item numbers: 7210.30.0030, 7210.30.0060, 
7210.41.0000, 7210.49.0030, 7210.49.0040, 7210.49.0045, 
7210.49.0091, 7210.49.0095, 7210.61.0000, 7210.69.0000, 
7210.70.6030, 7210.70.6060, 7210.70.6090, 7210.90.6000, 
7210.90.9000, 7212.20.0000, 7212.30.1030, 7212.30.1090, 
7212.30.3000, 7212.30.5000, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 
7212.50.0000, 7212.60.0000, 7225.91.0000, 7225.92.0000, 
7226.99.0110, and 7226.99.0130.
    The products subject to the investigation may also enter under 
the following HTSUS item numbers: 7210.90.1000, 7215.90.1000, 
7215.90.3000, 7215.90.5000, 7217.20.1500, 7217.30.1530, 
7217.30.1560, 7217.90.1000, 7217.90.5030, 7217.90.5060, 
7217.90.5090, 7225.99.0090, 7226.99.0180, 7228.60.6000, 
7228.60.8000, and 7229.90.1000.
    The HTSUS subheadings above are provided for convenience and 
customs purposes only. The written description of the scope of the 
investigation is dispositive.

Appendix II

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Changes Since the Preliminary Determination
IV. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Apply Adverse Facts Available 
for Yieh Phui's Cost Reporting
    Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Apply Zeroing to All Sales 
Comparisons and Deny Offsets by Assigning a Value of Zero to Non-
Dumped Sales
    Comment 3: Whether Commerce's Cost-Based Particular Market 
Situation (PMS) Finding Was Correct
    Comment 4: Whether Commerce's Sales-Based PMS Finding Was 
Correct
    Comment 5: Whether Commerce's Choice of Data Source in Making 
the Cost-Based PMS Adjustment Represents the Best Available 
Information on the Record
    Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should Adjust Its Total Cost of 
Production Calculation

[[Page 42213]]

    Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should Apply AFA to Sheng Yu Steel 
Co. Ltd.
    Comment 8: Cash Deposit Instructions
V. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2025-16609 Filed 8-28-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on August 29, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.