Notice2025-16601
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Brazil: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
August 29, 2025
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that imports of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) from Brazil are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation is July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 166 (Friday, August 29, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 166 (Friday, August 29, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42219-42223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-16601]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-351-862]
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Brazil: Final
Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
imports of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) from
Brazil are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at
less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation is July 1,
2023, through June 30, 2024.
DATES: Applicable August 29, 2025.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carter Sherwin or Nathan Araya, AD/CVD
Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4260 or (202) 482-3401,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 42220]]
Background
On April 10, 2025, Commerce published in the Federal Register its
preliminary affirmative determination in the LTFV investigation of CORE
from Brazil,\1\ in which we also postponed the final determination
until August 25, 2025, and invited interested parties to comment on the
Preliminary Determination.\2\ On July 17, 2025, Commerce issued a post-
preliminary analysis memorandum in which we made certain changes to our
differential pricing analysis.\3\ We invited interested parties to
comment on the changes to the differential pricing analysis.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Brazil:
Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value, Postponement of Final Determination, and Extension of
Provisional Measures, 90 FR 15333 (April 10, 2025) (Preliminary
Determination), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum
(PDM).
\2\ Id., 90 FR at 15333.
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation of
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Brazil: Post-
Preliminary Analysis,'' dated July 17, 2025.
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation of
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Brazil: Briefing
Schedule for Post-Preliminary Determination,'' dated July 25, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A summary of the events that occurred since Commerce published the
Preliminary Determination, as well as a full discussion of the issues
raised by parties for this final determination, may be found in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.\5\ The Issues and Decision Memorandum
is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic
Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at
<a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, a complete version of the Issues
and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Affirmative Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value
Investigation of Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from
Brazil,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this investigation is CORE from Brazil. For
a complete description of the scope of this investigation, see Appendix
I.
Scope Comments
In the Preliminary Scope Memorandum, we set aside a period of time
for parties to raise issues regarding product coverage (i.e., scope) in
scope-specific case briefs or other written comments.\6\ We received
scope case and rebuttal briefs from multiple interested parties. For a
summary of the product coverage comments and rebuttal responses
submitted to the record for this final determination, and accompanying
discussion and analysis of all comments timely received, see the Final
Scope Memorandum.\7\ In the Final Scope Memorandum, Commerce made no
changes to the scope language as it appeared in the Initiation
Notice.\8\ See Appendix I.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Memorandum, ``Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations of
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Australia, Brazil,
Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, South Africa, Taiwan, the Republic
of T[uuml]rkiye, the United Arab Emirates, and the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam, and Countervailing Duty Investigations of
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Brazil, Canada,
Mexico, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Scope
Decision Memorandum,'' dated April 3, 2025 (Preliminary Scope
Memorandum).
\7\ See Memorandum, ``Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations of
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Australia, Brazil,
Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, South Africa, Taiwan, the Republic
of T[uuml]rkiye, the United Arab Emirates, and the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam, and Countervailing Duty Investigations of
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Brazil, Canada,
Mexico, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Scope Decision
Memorandum,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Final Scope
Memorandum).
\8\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from
Australia, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, South Africa,
Taiwan, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, and the Socialist Republic
of Vietnam: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 89 FR
80196 (October 2, 2024) (Initiation Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Verification
Commerce conducted verification of the information relied upon in
making its final determination in this investigation, in accordance
with section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Specifically, we conducted on-site verifications of the sales and cost
information submitted by CSN \9\ and Usiminas \10\ for use in our final
determination.\11\ We used standard verification procedures, including
an examination of relevant sales and accounting records, and original
source documents provided by CSN and Usiminas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ We preliminarily found that Companhia Siderurgica Nacional
and Companhia Metalurgica Prada (Prada) (collectively, CSN) should
be treated as a single entity. See Preliminary Determination PDM at
4-5; see also Memorandum, ``Preliminary Affiliation and Collapsing
Memorandum for Companhia Siderurgica Nacional,'' dated April 3,
2025. No interested party commented on this finding, and we continue
to find these companies should be treated as a single entity for our
final determination.
\10\ We preliminarily found that Usinas Siderurgicas de Minas
Gerais S.A.; Unigal Ltda. (Unigal); and Solu[ccedil]oes em Aco
Usiminas (Solucoes) (collectively, Usiminas) should be treated as a
single entity. See Preliminary Determination PDM at 5; see also
Memorandum, ``Preliminary Affiliation and Collapsing Memorandum for
Usiminas Siderurgicas de Minas Gerais S.A.,'' dated April 3, 2025.
No interested party commented on this finding, and we continue to
find these companies should be treated as a single entity for our
final determination.
\11\ See Memoranda, ``Verification of the Sales Questionnaire
Responses of Companhia Siderurgica Nacional,'' dated June 2, 2025;
``Verification of the Sales Response of Usinas Siderurgicas de Minas
Gerais (Usiminas) and affiliates, Unigal Ltda. (Unigal), and
Solucoes em Aco Usiminas (Solucoes),'' dated June 2, 2025;
``Verification of the Cost Responses of Companhia Siderurgica
Nacional,'' dated June 26, 2025; and ``Verification of the Cost
Response of Usinas Siderurgicas de Minas Gerais S.A.,'' dated June
17, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs submitted by
interested parties in this investigation are addressed in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues addressed in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice at Appendix II.
Final Determination of the Single Entity
In the Preliminary Determination, we found that CSN is affiliated
with Prada, and Usiminas is affiliated with Unigal and Solucoes, and
that each should be treated as single entities, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.401(f).\12\ No interested party commented on these preliminary
findings. As the record contains no other information or evidence that
calls into question our preliminary findings, we adopt the reasoning
and findings of fact outlined in the Preliminary Determination with
respect to this issue. Therefore, we continue to find that CSN and
Prada should be treated as a single entity, and that Usiminas, Unigal,
and Solucoes should be treated as a single entity, for the purpose of
this proceeding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Preliminary Determination PDM at 5-6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Changes Since the Preliminary Determination
We have made certain changes to the margin calculations for CSN and
Usiminas since the Preliminary Determination. For a discussion of these
changes, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
All-Others Rate
Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that Commerce shall
determine an estimated all-others rate for all exporters and producers
not individually examined. This rate shall be an amount equal to the
weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins
established for exporters and producers individually investigated,
excluding any
[[Page 42221]]
zero and de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely under
section 776 of the Act.
In this investigation, Commerce calculated estimated weighted-
average dumping margins for CSN and Usiminas that are not zero, de
minimis, or based entirely on facts otherwise available. Therefore,
Commerce calculated the all-others rate using a weighted average of the
estimated weighted-average dumping margins calculated for the examined
respondents using each company's publicly-ranged values for the
merchandise under consideration.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ With two respondents under examination, Commerce normally
calculates: (A) a weighted-average of the estimated weighted-average
dumping margins calculated for the examined respondents; (B) a
simple average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins
calculated for the examined respondents; and (C) a weighted-average
of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins calculated for the
examined respondents using each company's publicly-ranged U.S. sales
values for the merchandise under consideration. Commerce then
compares (B) and (C) to (A) and selects the rate closest to (A) as
the most appropriate rate for all other producers and exporters.
See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, Germany,
Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Reviews, Final Results of Changed-Circumstances
Review, and Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53662
(September 1, 2010), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum
at Comment 1. As complete publicly ranged sales data were available,
Commerce based the all-others rate on the publicly ranged sales data
of the mandatory respondents. For a complete analysis of the data,
see Memorandum, ``Final Affirmative Determination in the Less-Than-
Fair-Value Investigation of Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel
Products from Brazil: All-Others Rate Calculation Memorandum,''
dated concurrently with this Federal Register notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Determination
Commerce determines that the following estimated weighted-average
dumping margins exist:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash deposit rate
Weighted-average (adjusted for export
Exporter/producer dumping margin subsidy offset)
(percent) (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Companhia Siderurgica Nacional; 191.26 \14\ 191.26
Companhia Metalurgica Prada...
Usinas Siderurgicas de Minas 25.70 21.77
Gerais S.A.; Unigal Ltda.;
Solu[ccedil]oes em Aco
Usiminas......................
All Others..................... 161.44 157.51
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ CSN received a final net subsidy rate in the companion
countervailing duty (CVD) investigation; however, none of the
countervailable subsidies were export-contingent. Therefore, no CVD
offset/adjustment is being made to CSN's cash deposit rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce intends to disclose its calculations and analysis
performed in connection with this final determination to interested
parties within five days of any public announcement or, if there is no
public announcement, within five days of the date of publication of
this notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b).
Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation
In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, Commerce will
instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue to
suspend liquidation of all entries of CORE, as described in Appendix I
of this notice, which were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after April 10, 2025, the date of publication of the
Preliminary Determination in the Federal Register.
Pursuant to section 735(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.210(d), upon publication of this notice, Commerce will instruct CBP
to require a cash deposit for estimated antidumping duties as follows:
(1) the cash deposit rate for the companies listed in the table above
that exported the subject merchandise will be equal to the company-
specific estimated weighted-average dumping margins determined in this
final determination; (2) if the exporter is not a company identified in
the table above, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will
be equal to the company-specific estimated weighted-average dumping
margin established for that producer; and (3) the cash deposit rate for
all other producers and exporters will be equal to the estimated
weighted-average dumping margin for all other producers and exporters
listed in the table above. These suspension of liquidation instructions
will remain in effect until further notice.
To determine the cash deposit rate, Commerce normally adjusts the
estimated weighted-average dumping margin by the amount of export
subsidies countervailed in a companion CVD investigation, when CVD
provisional measures are in effect. Accordingly, because Commerce made
an affirmative final determination for countervailable export
subsidies, Commerce has offset the estimated weighted-average dumping
margin by the appropriate export subsidy rate. Any such adjusted cash
deposit rate may be found in the ``Final Determination'' section above.
However, the suspension of liquidation of provisional measures in the
companion CVD case has been discontinued.\15\ Therefore, we are not
instructing CBP to collect cash deposits based on the adjusted
estimated weighted-average dumping margin for export subsidies at this
time. If the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) makes a final
affirmative determination of injury due to both dumping and subsidies,
then the cash deposit rate will be revised effective on the date of
publication of the ITC's final affirmative determination in the Federal
Register to be the company-specific estimated weighted-average dumping
margin adjusted for export subsidies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Brazil:
Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, and
Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty
Determination, 90 FR 9228 (February 10, 2025); see also section
703(d) of the Act, which states that the provisional measures may
not be in effect for more than four months, which in the companion
CVD case is 120 days after the publication of the preliminary
determination, or June 9, 2025 (i.e., the last day provisional
measures are in effect); and CBP Message 5162402, ``Discontinuation
of suspension of liquidation in the countervailing duty
investigation of certain corrosion-resistant steel products from
Brazil (C-351-863), dated June 11, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITC Notification
In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, Commerce will notify
the ITC of its final affirmative determination of sales at LTFV.
Because the final determination is affirmative, in accordance with
section 735(b)(2) of the Act, the ITC will make its final determination
as to whether the domestic industry in the United States is materially
injured, or threatened with material injury, by reason of imports or
sales (or the likelihood of sales) for importation of CORE from the
Brazil no later than 45 days after this final determination. If the ITC
determines that such injury does not exist, this proceeding will be
terminated, all cash deposits posted will be refunded, and suspension
of liquidation will be lifted. If the ITC determines that such injury
does exist, Commerce will issue an antidumping duty order directing CBP
to assess, upon further instruction by
[[Page 42222]]
Commerce, antidumping duties on all imports of CORE from Brazil
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the
effective date of the suspension of liquidation, as discussed in the
``Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation'' section above.
Administrative Protective Order (APO)
This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an
APO of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
This final determination and notice are issued and published
pursuant to sections 735(d) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.210(c).
Dated: August 25, 2025.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigation
The products covered by this investigation are certain flat-
rolled steel products, either clad, plated, or coated with
corrosion-resistant metals such as zinc, aluminum, or zinc-,
aluminum-, nickel- or iron-based alloys, whether or not corrugated
or painted, varnished, laminated, or coated with plastics or other
non-metallic substances in addition to the metallic coating. The
products covered include coils that have a width of 12.7 mm or
greater, regardless of form of coil (e.g., in successively
superimposed layers, spirally oscillating, etc.). The products
covered also include products not in coils (e.g., in straight
lengths) of a thickness less than 4.75 mm and a width that is 12.7
mm or greater and that measures at least 10 times the thickness. The
products covered also include products not in coils (e.g., in
straight lengths) of a thickness of 4.75 mm or more and a width
exceeding 150 mm and measuring at least twice the thickness. The
products described above may be rectangular, square, circular, or
other shape and include products of either rectangular or non-
rectangular cross-section where such cross-section is achieved
subsequent to the rolling process, i.e., products which have been
``worked after rolling'' (e.g., products which have been beveled or
rounded at the edges).
For purposes of the width and thickness requirements referenced
above:
(1) Where the nominal and actual measurements vary, a product is
within the scope if application of either the nominal or actual
measurement would place it within the scope based on the definitions
set forth above, and
(2) where the width and thickness vary for a specific product
(e.g., the thickness of certain products with non-rectangular cross-
section, the width of certain products with non-rectangular shape,
etc.), the measurement at its greatest width or thickness applies.
Steel products included in the scope of this investigation are
products in which:
(1) iron predominates, by weight, over each of the other
contained elements; and (2) the carbon content is 2 percent or less,
by weight.
Subject merchandise also includes corrosion-resistant steel that
has been further processed in a third country, including but not
limited to annealing, tempering, painting, varnishing, trimming,
cutting, punching and/or slitting or any other processing that would
not otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of the
investigation if performed in the country of manufacture of the in-
scope corrosion resistant steel.
All products that meet the written physical description are
within the scope of this investigation unless specifically excluded.
The following products are outside of and/or specifically excluded
from the scope of this investigation:
<bullet> Flat-rolled steel products either plated or coated with
tin, lead, chromium, chromium oxides, both tin and lead (``terne
plate'') or both chromium and chromium oxides (``tin free steel''),
whether or not painted, varnished or coated with plastics or other
non-metallic substances in addition to the metallic coating;
<bullet> Clad products in straight lengths of 4.7625 mm or more
in composite thickness and of a width which exceeds 150 mm and
measures at least twice the thickness;
<bullet> Certain clad stainless flat-rolled products, which are
three-layered corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat-rolled products
less than 4.75 mm in composite thickness that consist of a carbon
steel flat-rolled product clad on both sides with stainless steel in
a 20%-60%-20% ratio;
Also excluded from the scope of the antidumping duty
investigations on corrosion resistant steel from Taiwan are any
products covered by the existing antidumping duty order on corrosion
resistant steel from Taiwan. See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel
Products from India, Italy, the People's Republic of China, the
Republic of Korea and Taiwan: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping
Determination for India and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81
FR 48390 (July 25, 2016); Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from
Taiwan: Notice of Third Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value Pursuant to Court Decision and Partial Exclusion
from Antidumping Duty Order, 88 FR 58245 (August 25, 2023).
Also excluded from the scope of the antidumping duty
investigation on corrosion-resistant steel from the United Arab
Emirates and the antidumping duty and countervailing duty
investigations on corrosion-resistant steel from the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam are any products covered by the existing
antidumping and countervailing duty orders on corrosion-resistant
steel from the People's Republic of China and the Republic of Korea
and the antidumping duty order on corrosion-resistant steel from
Taiwan. See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from India,
Italy, the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea and
Taiwan: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Determination for
India and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 48390 (July 25,
2016); see also Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from
India, Italy, Republic of Korea and the People's Republic of China:
Countervailing Duty Order, 81 FR 48387 (July 25, 2016). This
exclusion does not apply to imports of corrosion-resistant steel
that are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption in
the United States for which the relevant importer and exporter
certifications have been completed and maintained and all other
applicable certification requirements have been met such that the
entry is entered into the United States as not subject to the
antidumping and countervailing duty orders on corrosion-resistant
steel from the People's Republic of China, the antidumping and
countervailing duty orders on corrosion-resistant steel from the
Republic of Korea, or the antidumping duty order on corrosion-
resistant steel from Taiwan.
The products subject to the investigation are currently
classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) under item numbers: 7210.30.0030, 7210.30.0060,
7210.41.0000, 7210.49.0030, 7210.49.0040, 7210.49.0045,
7210.49.0091, 7210.49.0095, 7210.61.0000, 7210.69.0000,
7210.70.6030, 7210.70.6060, 7210.70.6090, 7210.90.6000,
7210.90.9000, 7212.20.0000, 7212.30.1030, 7212.30.1090,
7212.30.3000, 7212.30.5000, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000,
7212.50.0000, 7212.60.0000, 7225.91.0000, 7225.92.0000,
7226.99.0110, and 7226.99.0130.
The products subject to the investigation may also enter under
the following HTSUS item numbers: 7210.90.1000, 7215.90.1000,
7215.90.3000, 7215.90.5000, 7217.20.1500, 7217.30.1530,
7217.30.1560, 7217.90.1000, 7217.90.5030, 7217.90.5060,
7217.90.5090, 7225.99.0090, 7226.99.0180, 7228.60.6000,
7228.60.8000, and 7229.90.1000. The HTSUS subheadings above are
provided for convenience and customs purposes only. The written
description of the scope of the investigation is dispositive.
Appendix II
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Changes Since the Preliminary Determination
IV. Discussion of the Issues
CSN
Comment 1: Whether to Apply Partial Adverse Facts Available
(AFA) to CSN's Downstream Sales
Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should File Its Copy of Exhibit VE-9
on the Record
Comment 3: Whether CSN's Unreconciled Costs from Its Cost
Reconciliation Should be Added to Its Reported Cost of Production
[[Page 42223]]
Comment 4: Whether CSN's Idle Asset Costs Have Been Double
Counted
Comment 5: Whether to Adjust CSN's General and Administrative
(G&A) Expense Rate
Comment 6: Whether to Adjust CSN's Financial Expense Rate
Usiminas
Comment 7: Whether to Revise our Treatment of Usiminas'
Downstream Sales
Comment 8: Whether to Remove Freight Revenue and Insurance
Revenue from Usiminas' Movement Expenses in the Home and U.S.
Markets
Comment 9: Whether to Account for Home Market Sales (HM) Returns
Comment 10: Whether to Revise Usiminas' Major Input Adjustment
Comment 11: Whether to Revise Usiminas' Financial Expense Rate
Other Issues
Comment 12: Whether to Implement Minor Corrections Accepted at
Verification
Comment 13: Whether Zeroing Methodology Should Be Applied in
This Investigation
Comment 14: Whether to Revise the All-Others Rate Applicable to
Brass-Coated Imports Subject to this Investigation
V. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2025-16601 Filed 8-28-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on August 29, 2025.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.