Rule2025-16351

Delete, Delete, Delete; Removal of Obsolete Regulations

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
August 26, 2025
Effective
August 26, 2025

Issuing agencies

Federal Communications Commission

Abstract

In this document, the Media Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) conforms part 76 of the Commission's rules to the court decisions in Time Warner Cable Inc. v. FCC, which vacated the temporary standstill rule for program carriage complaint proceedings, and EchoStar Satellite LLC v. FCC, which set aside two 2003 Commission orders adopting the encoding rules.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 163 (Tuesday, August 26, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 163 (Tuesday, August 26, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41518-41519]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-16351]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 76

[GN Docket No. 25-133; DA 25-736; FR ID 309943]


Delete, Delete, Delete; Removal of Obsolete Regulations

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this document, the Media Bureau of the Federal 
Communications Commission (Commission) conforms part 76 of the 
Commission's rules to the court decisions in Time Warner Cable Inc. v. 
FCC, which vacated the temporary standstill rule for program carriage 
complaint proceedings, and EchoStar Satellite LLC v. FCC, which set 
aside two 2003 Commission orders adopting the encoding rules.

DATES: Effective August 26, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Berthot, Federal Communications 
Commission, Media Bureau, Policy Division, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4a012b3e223364082f383e22253e0a2c2929642d253c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dd96bca9b5a4f39fb8afa9b5b2a99dbbbebef3bab2ab">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>, (202) 
418-7454.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Media Bureau's 
Order in GN Docket No. 25-133, DA 25-736, adopted and released on 
August 21, 2025. The full text of this document is available for public 
inspection and can be downloaded at <a href="https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-25-736A1.pdf">https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-25-736A1.pdf</a>.

Procedural Matters

    Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis: This document does not 
contain new or modified information collections subject to the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501-3521. In 
addition, therefore, it does not contain any new or modified 
information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer 
than 25 employees, pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act 
of 2002, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).
    Congressional Review Act: The Media Bureau has determined, and the 
Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Office of Management and Budget concurs, that this rule is ``non-
major'' under the Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 804(2). The 
Commission will send a copy of this Order to Congress and the 
Government Accountability Office pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

Synopsis

Introduction

    By this Order, we conform part 76 of the Commission's rules to 
court decisions nullifying certain provisions in that part. In the 
Delete, Delete, Delete proceeding, the Commission made clear its goal 
to ``review its rules to identify and eliminate those that are 
unnecessary in light of current circumstances.'' The Media Bureau takes 
this action in furtherance of that goal, finding that these rules ``no 
longer have any operative effect,'' and therefore should not remain in 
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Specifically, this action will 
remove from our regulations approximately 14 pages, 5,855 words, and 43 
rules or requirements.
    We first conform part 76 to the decision of the Second Circuit 
Court of Appeals (Second Circuit) in Time Warner Cable Inc. v. FCC 
(Time Warner Cable), which vacated the temporary standstill rule for 
program carriage complaint proceedings set forth in Sec.  76.1302(k) of 
the Commission's rules. The Commission adopted the temporary standstill 
rule in the Program Carriage Second Report and Order on July 29, 2011, 
establishing procedures for the Media Bureau's consideration of 
requests for a temporary standstill of the price, terms, and other 
conditions of an existing programming contract by a program carriage 
complainant seeking renewal of such a contract. The Commission 
published a summary of the Program Carriage Second Report and Order in 
the Federal Register on September 29, 2011. In accordance with normal 
procedure, the CFR was revised to reflect adoption of the temporary 
standstill rule. On September 4, 2013, the Second Circuit issued its 
decision in Time Warner Cable vacating the temporary standstill rule, 
finding that the rule was not promulgated in accordance with the 
Administrative Procedure Act's notice and comment rulemaking 
requirements. As a result of the Second Circuit's decision, the text of 
Sec.  76.1302(k) that currently appears in the CFR has no legal effect 
and is obsolete. We note that in 2020, the Commission issued a Report 
and Order deleting Sec.  76.1302(k) from the CFR. The Commission 
subsequently published a summary of this Report and Order in the 
Federal Register, with an effective date of January 19, 2021. 
Nevertheless, section 76.1302(k) still remains in the CFR. Accordingly, 
we delete Sec.  76.1302(k), finding that doing so has no effect on the 
scope and nature of the currently enforceable Commission requirements 
and simply effectuates the Second Circuit's action in Time Warner 
Cable.
    We also conform part 76 to the decision of the District of Columbia 
Circuit Court of Appeals (D.C. Circuit) in EchoStar Satellite LLC v. 
FCC (EchoStar Satellite), which set aside two 2003 Commission orders 
adopting the encoding rules set forth in Sec. Sec.  76.1901 through 
76.1908 of the Commission's rules. The Commission adopted the encoding 
rules, which place limits on the use of encoding by cable television 
operators and satellite providers to prevent or limit copying of their 
programming, in the Second Plug and Play Report and Order on September 
10, 2003. The Commission published a summary of the Second Plug and 
Play Report and Order in the Federal Register on November 28, 2003. On 
December 19, 2003, the Commission adopted an Order on Reconsideration 
which modified one of the definitions in the encoding rules. The 
Commission published a summary of the Order on Reconsideration in the 
Federal Register on January 28, 2004. In accordance with normal 
procedure, the CFR was revised to reflect adoption of the encoding 
rules. In EchoStar Satellite, the D.C. Circuit vacated in their 
entirety the Second Plug and Play Report and Order and the Order on 
Reconsideration, concluding that the Commission exceeded its statutory 
authority in adopting the encoding rules set forth in Sec. Sec.  
76.1901 through 76.1908. As a result of the D.C. Circuit's decision, 
the text of Sec. Sec.  76.1901 through 76.1908 that currently appear in 
the CFR has no legal effect and is obsolete. Accordingly, we delete 
Sec. Sec.  76.1901 through 76.1908, finding that doing so has no effect 
on the scope and nature of the currently enforceable Commission 
requirements and simply effectuates the D.C. Circuit's action in 
EchoStar Satellite.
    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), because we are simply conforming 
the text of the Commission's rules in the CFR to reflect the court's 
decisions in Time Warner Cable and EchoStar Satellite, and we are not 
taking any independent action or exercising any discretion, we find 
that notice and the opportunity for public comment are unnecessary for 
this action. For the same reason, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d), this 
action will be effective

[[Page 41519]]

immediately upon publication in the Federal Register.
    The changes to part 76 of the Commission's rules to conform to 
these court decisions are reflected in Appendix A.

Ordering Clauses

    Accordingly, it is ordered that part 76 of the Commission's rules, 
47 CFR part 76, is amended as set forth in Appendix A effective upon 
publication in the Federal Register.
    It is further ordered that the Office of the Managing Director, 
Performance Program Management, shall send a copy of this Order in a 
report to be sent to Congress and the Government Accountability Office 
pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 76

    Television.

Federal Communications Commission.
Thomas Horan,
Chief of Staff, Media Bureau.

Final Rules

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal 
Communications Commission amends 47 CFR part 76 as follows:

PART 76--MULTICHANNEL VIDEO AND CABLE TELEVISION SERVICE

0
1. The authority citation for part 76 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 153, 154, 301, 302, 302a, 303, 
303a, 307, 308, 309, 312, 315, 317, 325, 335, 338, 339, 340, 341, 
503, 521, 522, 531, 532, 534, 535, 536, 537, 543, 544, 544a, 545, 
548, 549, 552, 554, 556, 558, 560, 561, 562, 571, 572, 573.

Subpart Q--Regulation of Carriage Agreements


Sec.  76.1302  [Amended]

0
2. Amend Sec.  76.1302 by removing paragraph (k).

Subpart W--Encoding Rules


Sec. Sec.  76.1901 through 76.1908  [Removed]

0
3. Remove Sec. Sec.  76.1901 through 76.1908.

[FR Doc. 2025-16351 Filed 8-25-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on August 26, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.