Notice2025-15784

Quartz Surface Products From India and the Republic of Türkiye: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the Countervailing Duty Orders

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
August 19, 2025

Issuing agencies

Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) orders on quartz surface products from India and the Republic of T[uuml]rkiye (T[uuml]rkiye) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the levels indicated in the "Final Results of Sunset Reviews" section of this notice.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 158 (Tuesday, August 19, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 158 (Tuesday, August 19, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40340-40341]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-15784]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-533-890, C-489-838]


Quartz Surface Products From India and the Republic of 
T[uuml]rkiye: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Reviews of 
the Countervailing Duty Orders

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that 
revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) orders on quartz surface 
products from India and the Republic of T[uuml]rkiye (T[uuml]rkiye) 
would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of 
countervailable subsidies at the levels indicated in the ``Final 
Results of Sunset Reviews'' section of this notice.


DATES: Applicable August 19, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Al-Saadawi, Trade Agreements 
Policy and Negotiations, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 202-482-1930.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On June 22, 2020, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) 
published the Orders on quartz surface products from India and 
T[uuml]rkiye.\1\ On May 1, 2025, Commerce published the notice of 
initiation of the first sunset review of the Orders, pursuant to 
section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Quartz Surface Products from India and the 
Republic of Turkey: Countervailing Duty Orders, 85 FR 37431 (June 
22, 2020) (India Order and T[uuml]rkiye Order; collectively, 
Orders).
    \2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 90 FR 18642 
(May 1, 2025).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On May 13, 2025, Commerce received a notice of intent to 
participate in this review from Cambria Company LLC, Dal-Tile LLC, and 
Guidoni USA (the domestic interested parties), within the deadline 
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).\3\ The domestic interested 
parties claim interested party status within the meaning of section 
771(9)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b)(29)(v) as a domestic 
producer of the domestic like-product.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Domestic Interested Parties' Letter, ``Notice of Intent 
to Participate in the First Five-Year Review of the Countervailing 
Duty Order on Quartz Surface Products from India,'' dated May 13, 
2025; and Domestic Interested Parties' Letter, ``Notice of Intent to 
Participate in the First Five-Year Review of the Countervailing Duty 
Order on Quartz Surface Products from the Republic of Turkey,'' 
dated May 13, 2025.
    \4\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On June 2, 2025, Commerce received an adequate substantive response 
from the domestic interested parties, within the 30-day deadline 
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).\5\ Commerce did not receive a 
substantive response from either the Governments of T[uuml]rkiye or 
India or a respondent interested party to this proceeding. On June 20, 
2025, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) 
that it did not receive an adequate substantive response from 
respondent interested parties.\6\ As a result, Commerce conducted an 
expedited (120-day) sunset review of the Order, pursuant to section 
751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(B)(2) and (C)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Domestic Interested Parties' Letter, ``First Five-Year 
(``Sunset'') Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Quartz 
Surface Products from India: Domestic Interested Parties' 
Substantive Response,'' dated June 2, 2025; and Domestic Interested 
Parties' Letter, ``First Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review of the 
Countervailing Duty Order on Quartz Surface Products from the 
Republic of Turkey: Domestic Interested Parties' Substantive 
Response,'' dated June 2, 2025.
    \6\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Sunset Reviews Initiated on May 1, 
2025,'' dated June 20, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Orders

    The product covered by these Orders is quartz surface products from 
India

[[Page 40341]]

and T[uuml]rkiye. For the full description of the scope of the Orders, 
see the Issues and Decisions Memorandum.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the 
Countervailing Duty Orders on Quartz Surface Products from India and 
the Republic of Turkey,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby 
adopted by, this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    A complete discussion of all issues raised in these sunset reviews, 
including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of subsidization 
and the countervailable subsidy rates likely to prevail if the Orders 
were to be revoked, is contained in the accompanying Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.\8\ A list of the topics discussed in the Issues 
and Decision Memorandum is attached as an appendix to this notice. The 
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file 
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), 
which is available to registered users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In 
addition, complete versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can 
be accessed directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Sunset Reviews

    Pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(b) of the Act, Commerce 
determines that revocation of the India Order would be likely to lead 
to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the 
following net countervailable subsidy rates:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Net countervailable
              Producers/exporters                 subsidy rate  (percent
                                                       ad valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Antique Marbonite Private Limited..............                     1.57
Pokarna Engineered Stone Limited...............                     2.34
All Others.....................................                     2.17
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(b) of the Act, Commerce 
determines that revocation of the T[uuml]rkiye Order would be likely to 
lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the 
following net countervailable subsidy rates:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Net countervailable
              Producers/exporters                 subsidy rate  (percent
                                                       ad valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Belenco Di[scedil] Ticaret A.[Scedil]. and                          2.43
 Peker Y[uuml]zey Tasar[inodot]lar[inodot]
 Sanayi ve Tic A.[Scedil]......................
All Others.....................................                     2.43
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order (APO)

    This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
an APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of 
proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO 
materials, or conversion to judicial protective, orders is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation which is subject to sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these final results in accordance 
with sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.221(c)(5)(ii).

    Dated: August 14, 2025.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Orders
IV. History of the Orders
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
    1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of a Countervailable 
Subsidy
    2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates Likely to Prevail
    3. Nature of the Subsidies
VII. Final Results of Sunset Reviews
VIII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2025-15784 Filed 8-18-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on August 19, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.