Notice2025-15345

Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the St. Johns Watershed Project in Mississippi, New Madrid, and Scott Counties, Missouri

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
August 13, 2025

Issuing agencies

Agriculture DepartmentNatural Resources Conservation Service

Abstract

The Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Missouri State Office announces its intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the St. Johns Watershed plan, located within the Lower North Cut Ditch, Sikeston Ridge--St. Johns Ditch, Maple Slough Ditch, Ash Ditch--St. Johns Ditch, and St. Johns Ditch--St. Johns Bayou Watershed in Mississippi, New Madrid, and Scott Counties, Missouri. The project area involves the St. Johns Bayou and St. James Ditches and adjacent lands on the west landward side of the setback levee to the watershed outlet at Mississippi River floodgates near New Madrid, Missouri. Closure of the Mississippi River floodgates prevents flood damage from the river at flood stage; however, when closed, it blocks the outlet of the watershed and causes flooding from impounded interior runoff. Residences, agricultural land, and developed land are impacted. NRCS is requesting that interested individuals, Federal and State agencies, and Tribes participate in the scoping process for the EIS by attending the initial public scoping meeting and by submitting comments as described below. The goal of scoping is for NRCS to obtain input on identifying significant issues, potential alternatives, information, and analyses relevant to the proposed action.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 154 (Wednesday, August 13, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 13, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38944-38946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-15345]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service

[Docket No. NRCS-2025-0105]


Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for 
the St. Johns Watershed Project in Mississippi, New Madrid, and Scott 
Counties, Missouri

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of 
Agriculture (USDA).

ACTION: Notice of intent (NOI) to prepare an environmental impact 
statement; notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Missouri 
State Office announces its intent to prepare an Environmental Impact 
Statement (EIS) for the St. Johns Watershed plan, located within the 
Lower North Cut Ditch, Sikeston Ridge--St. Johns Ditch, Maple Slough 
Ditch, Ash Ditch--St. Johns Ditch, and St. Johns Ditch--St. Johns Bayou 
Watershed in Mississippi, New Madrid, and Scott Counties, Missouri. The 
project area involves the St. Johns Bayou and St. James Ditches and 
adjacent lands on the west landward side of the setback levee to the 
watershed outlet at Mississippi River floodgates near New Madrid, 
Missouri. Closure of the Mississippi River floodgates prevents flood 
damage from the river at flood stage; however, when closed, it blocks 
the outlet of the watershed and causes flooding from impounded interior 
runoff. Residences, agricultural land, and developed land are impacted. 
NRCS is requesting that interested individuals, Federal and State 
agencies, and Tribes participate in the scoping process for the EIS by 
attending the initial public scoping meeting and by submitting comments 
as described below. The goal of scoping is for NRCS to obtain input on 
identifying significant issues, potential alternatives, information, 
and analyses relevant to the proposed action.

DATES: Initial Public Scoping Meeting Date--August 14, 2025, 6:30 p.m. 
Comments--We invite you to submit comments in response to this notice. 
Please submit comments by September 12, 2025.

ADDRESSES: The initial public scoping meeting will be held at 127 E 
Main Street, East Prairie, Missouri 63845.
    We invite you to submit comments in response to this notice. You 
may submit your comments through one of the methods below:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> and search for Docket ID NRCS-2025-0105. Follow the 
online instructions for submitting comments; or
    <bullet> Agency Website: <a href="https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs-initiatives/watershed-programs/missouri/watershed-programs-mo">https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs-initiatives/watershed-programs/missouri/watershed-programs-mo</a>. Follow 
the instructions for sending comments on the St. Johns EIS; or
    <bullet> Mail: USDA-NRCS Assistant State Conservationist for Water 
Resources and Easements, 601 Business Loop 70 West, Suite 250, 
Columbia, Missouri 65203. Specify St. Johns EIS in your correspondence; 
or
    <bullet> Hand-Deliver or Courier: Natural Resources Specialist, 
Butler County

[[Page 38945]]

USDA Service Center, 4327 Highway 67 North, Poplar Bluff, MO 63901. 
Specify St Johns EIS in your correspondence.
    All substantive comments received will be posted without change and 
made publicly available on the agency website or on <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a> 
based on method received, including any personal information provided.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andy Rackers P.E. State Conservation 
Engineer, telephone: (573) 876-9376; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cb8aa5afb9aebce5b9aaa8a0aeb9b88bbeb8afaae5aca4bd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="11507f756374663f6370727a74636251646275703f767e67">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. 
Specify the St. Johns EIS in your inquiry.
    Individuals who require alternative means for communication should 
contact the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Target Center at 
(202) 720-2600 (voice and text telephone (TTY)) or dial 711 for 
Telecommunications Relay service (both voice and text telephone users 
can initiate this call from any telephone).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Purpose and Need

    The primary purpose of the proposed action is to develop measures 
that will prevent or reduce damage from flooding caused by degradation 
of the St. Johns Bayou Ditch and closure of the Mississippi River 
floodgates. The EIS is needed to address a range of issues caused by 
flooding, including property damage, reduced agricultural productivity 
and income, the socioeconomic impacts of traffic disruptions, delays in 
emergency response, and loss of life. Sedimentation of drainage canals 
is one contributing factor to the degradation that reduces the drainage 
capacity of the canals and contributes to flooding. This degradation 
leaves the surrounding area vulnerable to flooding that affects 
agricultural production, results in community isolation, and damaged 
transportation infrastructure. Excessive floodwater, created when the 
watershed outlet is closed, also compounds additional degradation of 
the regional drainage system, road infrastructure, and creates 
community hardship. Drainage water management is essential to the 
vitality of the region.
    The EIS will develop and evaluate potential measures for addressing 
the range of issues caused by flooding. The EIS will be prepared as 
required by section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act 
of 1969 (NEPA) and NRCS regulations in 7 CFR Subtitle A Part 1b (7 CFR 
1b).
    The sponsoring local organizations (SLOs) for this project are St. 
Johns Levee and Drainage District (SJLDD) and St. Johns Bayou Basin 
Drainage District (SJBBDD). The drainage districts are granted 
authority under State of Missouri Title XV, Chapter 242 to organize, 
appoint a board, and levy taxes for improvements to drainage district 
infrastructure to benefit public health, convenience, and welfare of 
the local population.

Preliminary Proposed Action and Alternatives, Including No Action

    The EIS will identify and evaluate all reasonable alternatives that 
include a range of measures to address the impacts of flooding caused 
by degradation of the drainage canal system and backwater flooding that 
occurs when the Mississippi River flood gates are closed. The EIS is 
expected to evaluate four alternatives: three action alternatives and 
one no-action alternative. The action alternatives, along with other 
scenarios, were evaluated in a 2023 Preliminary Investigation 
Feasibility Report conducted for NRCS for the NRCS Watershed Operations 
Program. Additionally, Alternative 3 was studied by the U.S. Army Corps 
of Engineers (USACE) through the development of an EIS in 2013; this 
alternative was determined to be feasible and to meet environmental 
scrutiny at the time of evaluation. The action alternatives may not be 
mutually exclusive and may not be limited to the preliminary 
alternatives described here, depending on public and agency input. The 
alternatives identified for preliminary consideration include the 
following:
    Alternative 1--No Action Alternative: This alternative represents 
what would happen if no Federal assistance or funding were provided. In 
the No-Action Alternative, the existing degradation of drainage canals 
would not be addressed. Backwater flooding when the Mississippi River 
floodgates are closed would continue to occur. Flooding of agricultural 
land, roads, and communities would continue, and the local community 
would continue to face the risk of property damage, negative 
socioeconomic impacts, and public safety issues.
    Alternative 2--Proposed Action--Cleanout of Dry Run Ditch: The 
proposed action would include restoring degraded areas of Dry Run Ditch 
to the flow capacity as originally designed and installing drop pipes 
where head cuts from the adjacent agricultural fields are present. 
Sedimentation from gully erosion would be reduced, and flow capacity of 
the drainage canal would be improved. Potential locations and extents 
of the canal cleanout will be evaluated during the EIS process.
    Alternative 3--Proposed Action--Construct flood control measures at 
the St. Johns Bayou Basin: The proposed action would include channel 
modification and the installation of a 1,000-cubic feet per second 
(cfs) pumping station east of the existing outlet at the lower extent 
of St. Johns Bayou. Channel modification would include widening St. 
Johns Bayou on both banks from the outlet near New Madrid to the north 
approximately 4.5 miles, widening 8 miles of the Setback Levee Ditch on 
one bank, and widening 3.5 miles of St. James Ditch on one bank. 
Embankment dimensions would be designed to minimize erosion and allow 
for efficient water conveyance. Channel modification would improve 
drainage efficiency and installation of a pumping station at the 
watershed outlet would allow for the draw-down of floodwaters within 
the watershed when the Mississippi River floodgates are closed when the 
river is at flood stage. Potential cleanout methods and locations will 
be evaluated during the EIS process and would include the impacts of 
any channel, wetland, or habitat modifications.
    Alternative 4--Proposed Action--Growing flood-resistant crops and 
planting native grasses and forbs along drainage canals: The proposed 
action would include establishing native grass and forb buffers to 
reduce erosion, improve streambank stability, trap sediments from 
adjacent land, and improve wildlife habitat. Additionally, crops that 
are more tolerant of flooding in areas that are particularly vulnerable 
to flooding would be grown to reduce economic impacts on farmers. 
Potential specific locations for native grass and forb buffers will be 
evaluated during the EIS process.

Summary of Expected Impacts

    The natural resources and aspects of the human environment to be 
identified and addressed for potential impacts in the EIS include 
soils, farmland, erosion, surface and groundwater quality and quantity, 
wetlands, waterways, floodplains, air quality, endangered and 
threatened species, fish and wildlife habitats, migratory birds, 
riparian areas, invasive species, cultural and historic resources, 
socioeconomics, public health and safety, and transportation, among 
others.
    The natural resources and aspects of the human environment that 
have more potential than others to be impacted--whether positively or 
negatively--include the socioeconomics of agricultural production and 
for landowners, wooded areas of drainage canals that may provide 
habitat for

[[Page 38946]]

endangered bats, and the ecosystem services provided by floodplains, 
wetlands, and riparian areas. The full list of concerns to be addressed 
for impacts will be developed through public scoping, agency 
consultations, and other components of the EIS process.

Anticipated Permits and Authorizations

    The following permits and authorizations, among others, will be 
evaluated for relevance to this project:
    <bullet> Federal Emergency Management Agency, Floodplain 
Development Permit. Implementation of the proposed action will require 
coordination with the local floodplain administrator and may require a 
Floodplain Development Permit to ensure all development and engineering 
requirements for construction within the Special Flood Hazard Areas are 
implemented.
    <bullet> Clean Water Act (CWA) and National Pollutant Discharge 
Elimination System (NPDES). The project will require water quality 
certification under section 401 of the CWA, NPDES permitting under 
section 402 of the CWA, and section 404 of the CWA for potential 
impacts to wetlands.
    <bullet> Missouri State 401 Water Quality Certification. The 
Missouri State 401 Water Quality certification will be required from 
the Missouri Department of Natural Resources if a US Army Corps of 
Engineers (USACE) individual permit is required. If the work is 
accomplished under USACE Nationwide Permits, then a programmatic Clean 
Water Section 401 certification may be granted, which specifies pre-
established conditions.
    <bullet> National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Section 106. 
Consultation with Tribal Nations and interested parties will be 
conducted as required by the NHPA.
    <bullet> Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7. Consultation with 
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will be conducted if needed based on 
ESA requirements.

Schedule of Decision-Making Process

    Following the initial public scoping meeting and comment period 
described above, NRCS will prepare a Draft EIS (DEIS) and circulate it 
for review and comment by agencies, Tribes, consulting parties, and the 
public for 45 days.
    Changes resulting from the DEIS public comments will be 
incorporated into the Final EIS, to be published within 24 months after 
publication of this NOI. A Record of Decision will be completed and 
will be publicly available. The Responsible Federal Official and 
decision-maker for NRCS is the Missouri State Conservationist.

Public Scoping Process

    In addition to the initial public scoping meeting and comment 
period described above, NRCS and the SLOs are planning to hold a second 
public meeting during preparation of the DEIS to provide an opportunity 
to review and comment on the alternatives that are developed. This 
second meeting will also be an opportunity to express concern or 
support and to gain further information regarding the proposed action.
    NRCS will coordinate the scoping process to correspond with Section 
106 of the NHPA (54 U.S.C. 306108) as allowed in 36 CFR 800.2(d)(3) and 
800.8.
    Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who 
commented, will become part of the public record. Scoping meeting 
presentation materials will be available for review and comment for 30 
days following the meeting.

Identification of Potential Alternatives, Information, and Analyses

    NRCS invites agencies, Tribes, consulting parties, and individuals 
that have special expertise, legal jurisdiction, or interest in the St. 
Johns Watershed project to provide written comments concerning the 
scope of the analysis and identification of potential alternatives, 
information, and analyses relevant to the proposed project.
    The information about historic and cultural resources within the 
area potentially affected by the proposed project will assist NRCS in 
identifying and evaluating impacts to such resources in the context of 
both NEPA and NHPA.
    NRCS will consult with Native American Tribes on a government-to-
government basis in accordance with the regulations in 36 CFR 800.2 and 
800.3, Executive Order 13175, and other policies. Tribal concerns, 
including impacts on Indian trust assets and potential impacts to 
cultural resources and historic properties, will be given due 
consideration.

Authorities

    Watershed planning is authorized under the Watershed Protection and 
Flood Prevention Act of 1954 (Pub. L. 83-566), as amended, and the 
Flood Control Act of 1944 (Pub. L. 78-534).

Federal Assistance Programs

    The title and number of the Federal Assistance Program as found in 
the Assistance Listing,\1\ to which this document applies is 10.904, 
Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See <a href="https://sam.gov/content/assistance-listings">https://sam.gov/content/assistance-listings</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Executive Order 12372

    E.O. 12372, ``Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs,'' 
requires consultation with State and local officials that would be 
directly affected by proposed Federal financial assistance. The 
objectives of the Executive Order are to foster an intergovernmental 
partnership and a strengthened federalism, by relying on State and 
local processes for State and local government coordination and review 
of proposed Federal financial assistance and direct Federal 
development. This program is subject to the provisions of Executive 
Order 12372, which requires intergovernmental consultation with State 
and local officials.

Nathan Goodrich,
Acting Missouri State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2025-15345 Filed 8-12-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on August 13, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.