Rule2025-15325

Rescission of Expired 1-Year Grace Period for Data Extensions

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
August 12, 2025
Effective
August 12, 2025

Issuing agencies

Interior DepartmentOcean Energy Management Bureau

Abstract

The Department of the Interior (the Department or DOI), acting through the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), is amending the Department's regulations to rescind the portion of a section, describing a grace period for release of geophysical data, that expired in 2010. This portion of the section is not necessary because it has expired. DOI is also making minor modifications effecting this rescission to another portion of the section.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 153 (Tuesday, August 12, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 12, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38705-38707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-15325]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 153 / Tuesday, August 12, 2025 / 
Rules and Regulations

[[Page 38705]]



DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

30 CFR Part 551

[Docket ID: BOEM-2025-0038]
RIN 1010-AE34


Rescission of Expired 1-Year Grace Period for Data Extensions

AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Interior.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Interior (the Department or DOI), acting 
through the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), is amending the 
Department's regulations to rescind the portion of a section, 
describing a grace period for release of geophysical data, that expired 
in 2010. This portion of the section is not necessary because it has 
expired. DOI is also making minor modifications effecting this 
rescission to another portion of the section.

DATES: This final rule is effective on August 12, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Jones, Office of Regulatory 
Affairs, BOEM, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, DC 20240, at email address 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b5dfd0dbdbdcd3d0c79bdfdadbd0c6f5d7dad0d89bd2dac3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fe949b909097989b8cd09491909b8dbe9c919b93d0999188">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>, or at telephone number (202) 571-8664.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Background information. This final rule revises the Department's 
regulations, which are administered by BOEM, that contain a provision 
which mentions that there was a 1-year grace period expiring September 
14, 2010, for releasing reprocessed geophysical data in sections 551.14 
(b)(5) and (6), and a cross reference to the 1-year grace period in 
section 551.14 (b)(2) of title 30 of the Code of Federal Regulations. 
Upon reviewing this regulation, the Department has determined that it 
should be rescinded because this grace period has expired and is no 
longer needed. The Department has determined that this reason, 
independently and alone, justifies revision of 30 CFR 551.14 (b)(2) and 
rescission of sections 551.14 (b)(5) and (6). The Department has no 
interest in maintaining a rule that is unnecessary.
    The Department has determined that this rule is not subject to the 
notice and comment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act 
(APA). Additionally, the Department has determined that there is good 
cause for making this administrative amendment final without prior 
proposal and opportunity for comment because the revisions are not 
substantive and have no impact on the regulatory requirements of the 
affected parts. The Department has determined that public comment on 
such administrative changes is unnecessary and that there is good cause 
under the APA for proceeding with a final rule. Furthermore, because a 
notice of proposed rulemaking and opportunity for public comment are 
not required to be given for this rule under the APA or any other law, 
the analytical requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act are not 
applicable. Accordingly, this rule is issued in final form. There is 
good cause to make this rule effective in fewer than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register because the revisions are 
administrative in nature. Therefore, this final rule is effective upon 
publication.
    Organization of this document. The information in this preamble is 
organized as follows:

I. General Information
    A. Purpose of This Regulatory Action and Summary
    B. Does this action apply to me?
    C. Where can I get a copy of this document and other related 
information?
II. Background
    A. Statutory and Regulatory Authority
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
    A. Executive Order (E.O.) 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review, as 
Amended by Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory 
Review
    B. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
    C. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
    D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
    E. Executive Order 12630: Governmental Actions and Interference 
With Constitutionally Protected Property Rights
    F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
    G. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform
    H. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments
    I. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
    J. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
    K. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
    L. Congressional Review Act (CRA)

I. General Information

A. Purpose of This Regulatory Action and Summary

    30 CFR 551.14 (b)(5) and (6) refer to a grace period between 
September 14, 2009, and September 14, 2010, during which BOEM did not 
release eligible reprocessed geophysical data if an extension was filed 
and approved. Geophysical data that was reprocessed 20 or more years 
after a permit was issued is subject to multiple requirements in 
551.14, and subject to release to the public following the timeline 
table in 551.14 (b)(1). Section 551.14 (b)(2) contains a cross 
reference to the 1-year grace period mentioned in section 551.14 
(b)(5). After this grace period expired in 2010, BOEM resumed releasing 
eligible reprocessed information under the original 25-year proprietary 
term, unless an extension was granted. This grace period has expired, 
and the section does not regulate the public. BOEM does not wish to 
maintain unnecessary rules, and this section will be removed. This 
final action revises 30 CFR 551.14 (b)(2) and removes sections 
551.14(b)(5) and (6).

B. Does this action apply to me?

    30 CFR 551.14 (b)(5), and (6) and a portion of (b)(2) do not 
regulate the public and no longer applies, given expiration of the 1-
year grace period at issue. This is an administrative change only, and 
its removal does not affect any legal rights, obligations, or interests 
of any affected party.

[[Page 38706]]

C. Where can I get a copy of this document and other related 
information?

    In addition to being available in the docket, BOEM will post an 
electronic copy of this final rule at: <a href="https://www.boem.gov/about-boem/regulations-guidance/published-rules">https://www.boem.gov/about-boem/regulations-guidance/published-rules</a>.

II. Background

A. Statutory and Regulatory Authority

    Section 5 of Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) (43 U.S.C. 
1334) authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to issue regulations to 
administer leasing for mineral development on the Outer Continental 
Shelf (OCS). Section 5(a) of OCSLA (43 U.S.C. 1334(a)) authorizes the 
Secretary to ``prescribe such rules and regulations as may be necessary 
to carry out [provisions of OCSLA]'' related to leasing on the OCS. 
This rule only makes administrative changes to remove a section that 
does not regulate the public.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. Executive Order (E.O.) 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review, as 
Amended by Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory 
Review

    E.O. 12866 gives OMB the authority to review regulatory actions 
that are categorized as ``significant''; i.e., those actions that are 
likely to result in a rule that may:
    <bullet> Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or 
more or adversely affect in a material way the economy; a sector of the 
economy; productivity; competition; jobs; the environment; public 
health or safety; or State, local or Tribal governments or communities;
    <bullet> Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with 
an action taken or planned by another agency;
    <bullet> Materially alter the budgetary impacts of entitlements, 
grants, user fees or loan programs or the rights and obligations of 
recipients thereof; or
    <bullet> Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal 
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in 
E.O. 12866.
    E.O. 12866 provides that the Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) will review 
all significant rules. OIRA has determined that this action is not a 
significant regulatory action, and therefore, it was not submitted to 
OMB for interagency review.
    E.O. 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866 while calling for 
improvements in the Nation's regulatory system to promote 
predictability and reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, most 
innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends. 
E.O. 13563 directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches that 
reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for the 
public where these approaches are relevant, feasible, and consistent 
with regulatory objectives. BOEM has developed this rule in a manner 
consistent with these requirements.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    The RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, requires agencies to prepare a 
regulatory flexibility analysis for any rule subject to notice and 
comment rulemaking requirements under the APA unless the rule will not 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities.
    The RFA applies only to rules for which an agency is required to 
first publish a proposed rule. See 5 U.S.C. 603(a) and 604(a). Because 
no proposed rule was published for this recission, no RFA analysis is 
required.

C. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)

    The SBREFA, 5 U.S.C. 804(2), requires BOEM to perform a regulatory 
flexibility analysis, provide guidance, and help small businesses 
comply with statutes and regulations for major rulemakings. This action 
is not subject to the SBREFA because it: (1) does not have an annual 
effect on the economy of $100 million or more; (2) will not cause a 
major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, 
Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic regions; 
and (3) does not have significant adverse effects on competition, 
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of 
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
    BOEM anticipates the final rule would have neither significant 
employment nor small business impacts; nor cause major price increases 
for consumers, businesses, or governments; nor significantly degrade 
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the 
ability of U.S. businesses to compete against foreign businesses. The 
rule only rescinds a portion of a regulation that has already expired 
and therefore is no longer needed and does not regulate the public.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce or otherwise determine compliance with Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman, and to the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Board. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of BOEM, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-
734-3247).

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    The UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, requires Federal agencies, unless 
otherwise prohibited by law, to assess the effects of regulatory 
actions on State, local and Tribal governments, and the private sector. 
Section 202 of UMRA generally requires Federal agencies to prepare a 
written statement, including a cost-benefit analysis, for each proposed 
and final rule with ``Federal mandates'' that may result in 
expenditures by State, local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate, 
or to the private sector of $100 million or more in any one year. BOEM 
has determined this action does not contain any unfunded mandate as 
described in UMRA 2, U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or 
uniquely affect small groups.
    The action imposes no enforceable duty on any State, local, or 
Tribal governments or the private sector.

E. Executive Order 12630: Governmental Actions and Interference With 
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights

    E.O. 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with 
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights, ensures that government 
actions affecting the use of private property are undertaken on a well-
reasoned basis with due regard for the potential financial impacts 
imposed on the government. This action does not affect a taking of 
private property or otherwise have taking implications under E.O. 
12630. A takings implication assessment is not required.

F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    E.O. 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 4, 1999) revoked and replaced E.O.s 
12612 (Federalism) and 12875 (Enhancing the Intergovernmental 
Partnership). E.O. 13132 took effect on November 2, 1999, and thus 
applies to actions published on or after November 2, 1999. Sections 3 
and 6 of E.O. 13132 apply to policies with federalism implications, 
defined in the Executive Order as including actions that have 
``substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between 
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power 
and

[[Page 38707]]

responsibilities among the various levels of government.''
    Regulatory actions that have substantial direct effects on the 
States, on the relationship between the national government and the 
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government are subject to E.O. 13132. Under the 
criteria in section 1 of E.O. 13132, this rule does not have sufficient 
federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism 
summary impact statement. It will not have substantial direct effects 
on the States, on the relationship between the national government and 
the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among 
the various levels of government.

G. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform

    E.O. 12988 requires that rules:
    (1) Meet the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all 
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be 
written to minimize litigation; and
    (2) Meet the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all 
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal 
standards.
    This rule complies with the requirements of E.O. 12988.

H. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments

    The Department and BOEM strive to strengthen their government-to-
government relationships with Indian Tribes through a commitment to 
consultation with Indian Tribes and recognition of the Tribes' right to 
self-governance and Tribal sovereignty. BOEM evaluated this rule under 
the Department's consultation policy, Departmental Manual part 512, 
chapters 4 and 5, and E.O. 13175. BOEM determined that this rule has no 
substantial direct effects on federally recognized Indian Tribes or 
Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act Corporations and that consultation 
under existing Department and BOEM policies is not required.

I. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    This rule does not contain information collection requirements, and 
a submission to the OMB under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) is not 
required. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number.

J. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

    This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly 
affecting the quality of the human environment. A detailed 
environmental analysis under NEPA is not required because the final 
rule is covered by a categorical exclusion (see 43 CFR 46.205). This 
final rule meets the criteria set forth at 43 CFR 46.210(i) for a 
Departmental categorical exclusion in that this final rule is ``of an 
administrative, financial, legal, technical, or procedural nature.'' 
BOEM has also determined that the final rule does not involve any of 
the extraordinary circumstances listed in 43 CFR 46.215 that would 
require further analysis under NEPA.

K. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    E.O. 13211 was issued on May 22, 2001, and requires Federal 
agencies to prepare a ``Statement of Energy Effects'' when undertaking 
certain regulatory actions. A Statement of Energy Effects describes the 
adverse effects of a ``significant energy action'' on energy supply, 
distribution and use; reasonable alternatives to the action; and the 
expected effects of the alternatives on energy supply, distribution and 
use.
    Under E.O. 13211, BOEM is required to prepare and submit to OMB a 
``Statement of Energy Effects'' for ``significant energy actions.'' 
This should include a detailed statement of any adverse effects on 
energy supply, distribution, or use (including a shortfall in supply, 
price increases, and increased use of foreign supplies) expected to 
result from the action and a discussion of reasonable alternatives and 
their effects. This action is not subject to E.O. 13211, because it is 
not a significant regulatory action under E.O. 12866.

L. Congressional Review Act (CRA)

    The CRA, 5 U.S.C. 801-808, established a mechanism to expedite 
congressional review of agency rules. The CRA generally provides that 
before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must 
submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House 
of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. It 
is important to note that the CRA applies only to final rules; it does 
not apply to proposed rules. BOEM generally submits a report containing 
the rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. 
House of Representatives and the Comptroller General of the United 
States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A 
``major rule'' cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published 
in the Federal Register or is submitted to Congress, whichever is 
later.
    This rule is exempt from the CRA because it is a rule of department 
organization, procedure or practice that does not substantially affect 
the rights or obligations of non-agency parties (5 U.S.C. 804(3)).

List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 551

    Freedom of information, Oil and gas exploration, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Research.

    This action by the Assistant Secretary is taken herein pursuant to 
an existing delegation of authority.

Adam G. Suess,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Land and Minerals Management.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of the 
Interior amends 30 CFR part 551 as follows:

PART 551--GEOLOGICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL (G&G) EXPLORATIONS OF THE 
OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF

0
1. The authority citation for part 551 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Section 104, Public Law 97-451, 96 Stat. 2451 (30 
U.S.C. 1714), Public Law 109-432, Div C, Title I, 120 Stat. 3000; 30 
U.S.C. 1751; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 43 U.S.C. 1334; 33 U.S.C. 2704, 2716; 
E.O. 12777, as amended; 43 U.S.C. 1331 et seq., 43 U.S.C. 1337.


0
2. Amend Sec.  551.14 by revising paragraph (b)(2) and removing and 
reserving paragraphs (b)(5) and (6) to read as follows:


Sec.  551.14  Protecting and disclosing data and information submitted 
to BOEM under a permit

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (2) Permittees and third parties may apply to BOEM for an extension 
of the 25-year proprietary term for geophysical information reprocessed 
20 or more years after BOEM issued the germane permit. You must submit 
the application to BOEM within 90 days after completion of the 
reprocessing. Filing locations are listed in Sec.  551.5(d). Your 
application must include:
* * * * *
    (5) [Removed and Reserved]
    (6) [Removed and Reserved]
* * * * *

[FR Doc. 2025-15325 Filed 8-11-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4340-98-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on August 12, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.