Notice2025-15308

Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Recission, in Part, of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
August 12, 2025

Issuing agencies

Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd. (Ancientree), and KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd. (KM), made sales of wooden cabinets and vanities and components thereof (cabinets) at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024. Additionally, Commerce preliminarily determines that 14 companies are eligible for a separate rate and five companies are part of the China- wide Entity. Finally, Commerce is rescinding this review with respect to 49 companies. Commerce invites interested parties to comment on the preliminary results of this review.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 153 (Tuesday, August 12, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 12, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38727-38730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-15308]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-106]


Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components Thereof From the 
People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Recission, in Part, 
of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 
determines that The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd. (Ancientree), and KM 
Cabinetry Co., Ltd. (KM), made sales of wooden cabinets and vanities 
and components thereof (cabinets) at less than normal value (NV) during 
the period of review (POR) April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2024. 
Additionally, Commerce preliminarily determines that 14 companies are 
eligible for a separate rate and five companies are part of the China-
wide Entity. Finally, Commerce is rescinding this review with respect 
to 49 companies. Commerce invites interested parties to comment on the 
preliminary results of this review.

DATES: Applicable August 12, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacob Keller or Blair Hood, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4849or (202) 482-8329, 
respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On April 21, 2020, Commerce published in the Federal Register the 
antidumping duty (AD) order on cabinets from the People's Republic of 
China (China).\1\ On April 1, 2024, Commerce published in the Federal 
Register a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of 
the Order.\2\ On June 12, 2024, based on timely requests for an 
administrative review, Commerce published the notice of initiation of 
this administrative review of the Order with respect to 70 
companies.\3\ On June 24, 2024, Hong Kong Jian Cheng Trading Co., Ltd., 
withdrew its request for review.\4\ On July 10, 2024, Nanjing Kaylang 
Co., Ltd., withdrew its request for review.\5\ On July 12, 2024, 
Commerce received 11 timely no-shipment certifications, 17 separate 
rate certifications (SRC), and one separate rate application (SRA). On 
September 10, 2024, the American Kitchen Cabinet Alliance (the 
petitioner) and MasterBrand timely withdrew their requests for review 
of certain companies.\6\ On March 12 and June 30, 2025, Commerce stated 
its intent to rescind the review for certain companies with no entries 
of subject merchandise during the POR.\7\ Thus, we are rescinding this 
review with respect to the 49 companies with no reviewable entries or 
for which a review request was timely withdrawn. These preliminary 
results cover 21 companies, including the mandatory respondents, 
Ancientree and KM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components Thereof from 
the People's Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order, 85 FR 22126 
(April 21, 2020) (Order).
    \2\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative 
Review and Join Annual Inquiry Service List, 89 FR 22390 (April 1, 
2024).
    \3\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 89 FR 49844 (June 12, 2024) (Initiation 
Notice).
    \4\ See Hong Kong Jian's Letter, ``Withdrawal of Request for 
Review,'' dated June 24, 2024.
    \5\ See Nanjing Kaylang's Letter, ``Withdrawal of Request for 
Review,'' dated July 10, 2024.
    \6\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Withdrawal of Request for 
Administrative Review,'' dated September 10, 2024; see also 
MasterBrand's Letter, ``Partial Withdrawal of Request for 
Administrative Review,'' dated September 10, 2024.
    \7\ See Memoranda, ``Notice of Intent to Rescind Review, In 
Part,'' dated March 12, 2025 (Notice of Intent to Rescind); and 
``Second Notice of Intent to Rescind Review, In Part,'' dated June 
30, 2025 (Second Notice of Intent to Rescind).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On July 22, 2024, Commerce tolled certain deadlines in this 
administrative proceeding by seven days.\8\ On December 9, 2024, 
Commerce tolled certain deadlines in this administrative proceeding by 
an additional 90 days.\9\ On March 4, 2025, Commerce postponed the 
preliminary results of this administrative review.\10\ Additionally, on 
May 12, 2025, Commerce further postponed the preliminary results of 
this administrative review.\11\ Accordingly, the deadline for the 
preliminary results of this review is August 5, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings,'' dated July 22, 2024.
    \9\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings,'' dated December 9, 2024.
    \10\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated March 4, 
2025.
    \11\ See Memorandum, ``Second Extension of Deadline for 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' 
dated May 12, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For a complete description of the events that followed the 
initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\12\ 
The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file 
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 
ACCESS is available to registered users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. A 
list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 
included as appendix I to this notice. In addition, a complete version 
of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at 
<a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary 
Results and Partial Rescission of the 2023-2024 Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review of Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components 
Thereof from the People's Republic of China,'' dated concurrently 
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by the Order are wooden cabinets from China. 
For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at the ``Scope'' 
section for more details.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Recission of Review, In Part

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an 
administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party that requested 
a review

[[Page 38728]]

withdraws its request within 90 days of the date of publication of the 
notice of initiation. We are rescinding the review with respect to 27 
companies for which there is no outstanding request for review.\14\ 
Because the withdrawals of the review requests were timely filed, and 
no other party requested a review of these companies, in accordance 
with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce is rescinding this review of the 
Order with respect to 27 companies.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 6-7.
    \15\ See Appendix IV.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Furthermore, there were no suspended entries of subject merchandise 
for 22 companies for which the administrative review was initiated. On 
March 12 and June 30, 2025, Commerce notified all interested parties of 
its intent to rescind the administrative review, in part, with respect 
to these companies.\16\ No interested party submitted comments in 
response to these notices. In the absence of suspended entries of 
subject merchandise during the POR, for the companies listed in 
appendix IV, which this review was initiated, we are hereby rescinding 
this administrative review, in part, with respect to those companies, 
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Notice of Intent to Rescind; and Second Notice of 
Intent to Rescind.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Accordingly, Commerce is rescinding the review with respect to 49 
companies that had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR 
or for which a review request was timely withdrawn.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See Appendix IV.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 
751(a)(1)(B) of the Act. Commerce calculated export price in accordance 
with section 772 of the Act. Further, because China is a non-market 
economy (NME) within the meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, 
Commerce calculated NV in accordance with section 773(c) of the Act. In 
addition, Commerce has relied on partial adverse facts available under 
sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act for KM. For a full description of 
the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum.

Separate Rates

    In the Initiation Notice, we informed parties that all firms for 
which an NME review was initiated that wished to qualify for separate 
rate status must complete, as appropriate, either an SRA or an SRC.\18\ 
In all proceedings involving an NME country, Commerce maintains a 
rebuttable presumption that all companies are subject to government 
control, and, thus, should be assessed a single weighted-average 
dumping margin unless the company can affirmatively demonstrate an 
absence of government control, both in law (de jure) and in fact (de 
facto), with respect to its exports, (i.e., an affirmatively 
demonstrate that it is eligible for a separate rate).\19\ Commerce 
preliminarily determines 14 companies that filed either an SRA or SRC 
and the two mandatory respondents are eligible for a separate rate.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See Initiation Notice, 89 FR at 49845.
    \19\ See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than 
Fair Value, and Affirmative Critical Circumstances, In Part: Certain 
Lined Paper Products from the People's Republic of China, 71 FR 
53079, 53082 (September 8, 2006); see also Final Determination of 
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Partial Affirmative 
Determination of Critical Circumstances: Diamond Sawblades and Parts 
Thereof from the People's Republic of China, 71 FR 29303, 29307 (May 
22, 2006).
    \20\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at the ``Separate Rate 
Determination'' section for more details.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address the 
establishment of a separate rate to be applied to companies not 
selected for individual examination when Commerce limits its 
examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) 
of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, 
which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an 
investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for separate-rate 
respondents which Commerce did not examine individually in an 
administrative review. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act articulates a 
preference that Commerce is not to calculate an all-others rate using 
rates for individually examined respondents which are zero, de minimis, 
or based entirely on facts available. For the preliminary results of 
this review, Commerce determined the estimated dumping margins for 
Ancientree and KM to be 7.67 and 112.23 percent, respectively. For the 
reasons explained in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, we are 
assigning a 14.48 percent rate to the non-examined respondents that 
qualify for a separate rate in this review, consistent with Commerce's 
practice and section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

China-Wide Entity

    Commerce's policy regarding the conditional review of the China-
wide entity applies to this administrative review.\22\ Under this 
policy, the China-wide entity will not be under review unless a party 
specifically requests, or Commerce self-initiates, a review of the 
entity. Because no party requested a review of the China-wide entity in 
this review, the entity is not under review, and the entity's 
assessment rate (i.e., 251.64 percent) is not subject to change.\23\ 
For the reasons explained in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, 
Commerce considers all other companies for which a review was requested 
with suspended entries of subject merchandise (none of which filed an 
SRA or SRC)) to be part of the China-wide entity, including two 
companies that filed no shipment certifications.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in 
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty 
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity 
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
    \23\ See Order.
    \24\ See Appendix II; see also Preliminary Decision Memorandum 
at 12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Results of the Administrative Review

    Commerce preliminarily determines that the following estimated 
weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period covering April 1, 
2023, through March 31, 2024:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                          Exporter                              dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd.......................................      112.23
The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd.............................        7.67
Non-Examined Companies Receiving a Separate Rate \25\.......       14.48
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ See Appendix III.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce intends to disclose to parties to the proceeding the 
calculation performed for these preliminary results of review within 
five days of any public announcement of these preliminary results, or 
if there is no public announcement, within five days of the date of 
publication of this notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with 
19 CFR 351.224(b).

Public Comment

    Commerce will establish the briefing schedule at a later time and 
will notify parties of the schedule in accordance with 19 CFR 351.309. 
Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be 
filed not later than five days after the date for filing case 
briefs.\26\ Interested parties who submit

[[Page 38729]]

case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding must submit: (1) a 
table of contents listing each issue addressed; and (2) a table of 
authorities.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative Protective 
Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 
2023) (APO and Service Final Rule).
    \27\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2); see also 19 CFR 
351.303 (for general filing requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As provided under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior 
proceedings we have encouraged interested parties to provide an 
executive summary of their briefs that should be limited to five pages 
total, including footnotes. In this review, we instead request that 
interested parties provide, at the beginning of their briefs, a public 
executive summary for each issue raised in their briefs.\28\ Further, 
we request that interested parties limit their executive summary of 
each issue to no more than 450 words, not including citations. We 
intend to use the executive summaries as the basis of the comment 
summaries included in the issues and decision memorandum that we will 
issue for the final results in this administrative review. We request 
that interested parties include footnotes for relevant citations in the 
executive summary of each issue. Note that Commerce has amended certain 
of its requirements pertaining to the service of documents in 19 CFR 
351.303(f).\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ We use the term ``issue'' here to describe an argument that 
Commerce would normally address in a comment of the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.
    \29\ See APO and Service Final Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing, limited to issues raised in the case and rebuttal 
briefs, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, within 30 days 
after the publication of this notice. Requests should contain the 
party's name, address, telephone number, the number of participants, 
whether any participant is a foreign national, and a list of the issues 
to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, Commerce intends 
to hold the hearing at a time and date to be determined. Parties should 
confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two 
days before the scheduled date.

Assessment Rates

    Upon issuing the final results, Commerce will determine, and CBP 
shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by 
this review.\30\ If the preliminary results are unchanged for the final 
results, we will instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 
251.64 percent to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR 
which were exported by the companies considered to be a part of the 
China-wide entity listed in appendix II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier 
than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this 
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the 
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will 
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties 
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 
90 days of publication).
    For Ancientree and KM, Commerce intends to calculate importer or 
customer-specific assessment rates, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1).\31\ Where the respondent reported reliable entered 
values, Commerce intends to calculate importer or customer-specific ad 
valorem assessment rates by aggregating the amount of dumping 
calculated for all U.S. sales to the importer or customer and dividing 
this amount by the total entered value of the merchandise sold to the 
importer or customer.\32\ Where the respondent did not report entered 
values, Commerce will calculate importer or customer-specific 
assessment rates by dividing the amount of dumping for reviewed sales 
to the importer or customer by the total quantity of those sales. 
Commerce will calculate an estimated ad valorem importer or customer-
specific assessment rate to determine whether the per-unit assessment 
rate is de minimis; however, Commerce will use the per-unit assessment 
rate where entered values were not reported.\33\ Where an importer or 
customer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is not zero or de minimis, 
Commerce will instruct CBP to collect the appropriate duties at the 
time of liquidation. Where either the respondent's weighted average 
dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer or customer-
specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or de minimis, Commerce 
will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to 
antidumping duties.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted 
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012) 
(Final Modification).
    \32\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
    \33\ Id.
    \34\ See Final Modification, 77 FR at 8103.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to a refinement to Commerce's assessment practice, where 
sales of subject merchandise exported by an individually examined 
respondent were not reported in the U.S. sales data submitted by the 
respondent, but the merchandise was entered into the United States 
during the POR, Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate any entries of 
such merchandise at the AD assessment rate for the China-wide 
entity.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \35\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market 
Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the respondents that were not selected for individual 
examination in this administrative review, but which qualified for a 
separate rate, the assessment rate will be based on the weighted-
average dumping margins assigned to the respondents selected for 
individual examination, as appropriate, in the final results of this 
review.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \36\ See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic 
of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments: 2014-2015, 81 
FR 29528 (May 12, 20216), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum at 10-11, unchanged in Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from 
the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; Final Determination of No Shipments; 2014-
2015, 81 FR 54042 (August 15, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the companies for which this review is rescinded with these 
preliminary results, we will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties 
on all appropriate entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit of 
estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or 
withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, during the period April 1, 
2023, through March 31, 2024, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.212(c)(l)(i).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the 
subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by 
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for the subject merchandise 
exported by the company listed above that has a separate rate, the cash 
deposit rate will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin 
established in the final results of this administrative review (except, 
if the rate is zero or de minimis, then zero cash deposit will be 
required); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed Chinese and non-
Chinese exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a 
prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue 
to be the existing exporter specific rate; (3) for all Chinese 
exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be 
entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for the 
China-

[[Page 38730]]

wide entity; and (4) for all non-Chinese exporters of subject 
merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit 
rate will be the rate applicable to the Chinese exporter that supplied 
that non-Chinese exporter. These cash deposit requirements, when 
imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.

Final Results of Review

    Unless otherwise extended, Commerce intends to issue the final 
results of this administrative review, which will include the results 
of its analysis of issues raised in case and rebuttal briefs, within 
120 days of these preliminary results of review in the Federal 
Register, pursuant to 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties 
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during these PORs. Failure 
to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption 
that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred 
and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties, and/or an 
increase in the amount of antidumping duties by the amount of 
countervailing duties.

Notification to Interested Parties

    Commerce is issuing and publishing the preliminary results of this 
review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B), 751(a)(3) and 777(i) 
of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4) and 351.221(b)(4).

    Dated: August 5, 2025.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Recission of Administrative Review, In Part
V. Discussion of Methodology
VI. Adjustment Under Section 777A(f) of the Act
VII. Currency Conversion
VIII. Recommendation

Appendix II

Companies Considered to Be Part of the China-Wide Entity

1. Fujian Leifeng Cabinetry Co., Ltd.
2. Oppein Home Group Inc.
3. Weihai Jarlin Cabinetry Manufacture Co., Ltd.
4. Xiamen Adler Cabinetry Co., Ltd.
5. Zhongshan NU Furniture Co., Ltd.

Appendix III

Companies Under Review Receiving a Separate Rate

1. Anhui Swanch Cabinetry Co., Ltd.
2. Changyi Zhengheng Woodwork Co., Ltd.
3. Dalian Hualing Wood Co., Ltd.
4. Goldenhome Living Co., Ltd.
5. Honsoar New Building Material Co., Ltd.
6. Jiang Su Rongxin Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
7. (formerly known as Jiang Su Rongxin Cabinets Ltd.)
8. KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd.
9. Senke Manufacturing Company
10. Shanghai Zifeng International Trading Co., Ltd.
11. Taishan Oversea Trading Company Ltd.
12. The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd.
13. Xiamen Golden Huanan Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
14. Xuzhou Yihe Wood Co., Ltd.
15. Yixing Pengjia Technology Co., Ltd. (formerly known as Yixing 
Pengjia Cabinetry Co. Ltd.)

Appendix IV

Companies Rescinded From Review

A. Requests for Review Withdrawn

1. Anhui Xinyuanda Cupboard Co., Ltd.
2. Deqing Meisheng Import and Export Co., Ltd.
3. Dongguan Ri Sheng Home Furnishing Articles Co., Ltd.
4. Fujian Senyi Kitchen Cabinet Co., Ltd.
5. Fuzhou Hauster Kitchen Cabinet Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
6. Fuzhou Pyrashine Trading Co., Ltd.
7. Jiang Su Rongxin Import and Export Co., Ltd.
8. Jiangsu Sunwell Cabinetry Co., Ltd.
9. Jiangsu Xiangsheng Bedtime Furniture Co., Ltd.
10. Kunshan Baiyulan Furniture Co., Ltd.
11. Linshu Meibang Furniture Co., Ltd.
12. Linyi Bomei Furniture Co., Ltd.
13. Nantong Aershin Cabinets Co., Ltd.
14. Quanzhou Ample Furnishings Co., Ltd.
15. Qufu Xinyu Furniture Co., Ltd.
16. Shanghai Beautystar Cabinetry Co., Ltd.
17. Shanghai Zifeng Industries Development Co., Ltd.
18. Shenzhen Pengchengzhirong Trade Co., Ltd.
19. Suzhou Siemo Wood Import & Export Co., Ltd.
20. Tech Forest Cabinetry Co., Ltd.
21. Xiamen Got Cheer Co., Ltd.
22. Yichun Dongmeng Wood Co., Ltd.
23. Yindu Kitchen Equipment Co., Ltd.
24. Zaozhuang New Sharp Import & Export Trading Co., Ltd.
25. ZBOM Cabinets Co., Ltd.
26. Zhongshan KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd.
27. Zhoushan For-strong Wood Co., Ltd.

B. No Shipment Companies/No Reviewable Entries

1. Hong Kong Jian Cheng Trading Co., Ltd.
2. Fujian Dushi Wooden Industry Co., Ltd.
3. Jiangsu Beichen Wood Co., Ltd.
4. Nanjing Kaylang Co., Ltd.
5. Linyi Kaipu Furniture Co., Ltd.
6. Qingdao Shousheng Industry Co., Ltd.
7. Qingdao Haiyan Drouot Household Co., Ltd.
8. Shandong Longsen Woods Co., Ltd.
9. Taizhou Overseas Int'l Ltd.
10. Weifang Yuanlin Woodenware Co., Ltd.
11. Dalian Meisen Woodworking Co., Ltd.
12. Fuzhou CBM Import & Export Co., Ltd.
13. Guangzhou Nuolande Import and Export Co., Ltd.
14. Jiangsu Weisen Houseware Co., Ltd.
15. (also known as Weisen Houseware Co., Ltd.)
16. Morewood Cabinetry Co., Ltd.
17. Sheen Lead International Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
18. Shandong Jinhua Wood Co., Ltd.
19. Shouguang Fushi Wood Co., Ltd.
20. Taishan Hongxiang Trading Co., Ltd.
21. Weifang Fuxing Wood Co., Ltd.
22. Zhangzhou OCA Furniture Co., Ltd.

[FR Doc. 2025-15308 Filed 8-11-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on August 12, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.