Rule2025-14805

Rescission of Renewable Energy Leasing Schedule

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
August 5, 2025
Effective
September 4, 2025

Issuing agencies

Interior DepartmentOcean Energy Management Bureau

Abstract

The Department of the Interior (the Department or DOI), acting through the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), is amending the Department's regulations to rescind a section that provides for publishing a renewable energy leasing schedule every 2 years. This section is not necessary because it is not mandated by the statute for renewable energy regulations.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 148 (Tuesday, August 5, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 148 (Tuesday, August 5, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37386-37389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-14805]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

30 CFR Part 585

[Docket ID: BOEM-2025-0036]
RIN 1010-AE35


Rescission of Renewable Energy Leasing Schedule

AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Interior.

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Interior (the Department or DOI), acting 
through the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), is amending the 
Department's regulations to rescind a section that provides for 
publishing a renewable energy leasing schedule every 2 years. This 
section is not necessary because it is not mandated by the statute for 
renewable energy regulations.

DATES: This direct final rule is effective on September 4, 2025 without 
further action, unless significant adverse comment is received by 
August 20, 2025 If adverse comment is received, BOEM will publish a 
timely withdrawal of the rule in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: BOEM has established a docket for this action under Docket 
ID

[[Page 37387]]

No. BOEM-2025-0036. All documents in the docket are listed on the 
website at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> and can be found by entering the 
Docket ID in the ``Enter Keyword or ID'' search box and clicking 
``search''.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Jones, Office of Regulatory 
Affairs, BOEM, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, DC 20240, at email address 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ff959a919196999a8dd19590919a8cbf9d909a92d1989089"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5c36393232353a392e72363332392f1c3e333931723b332a">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>, or at telephone number (202) 571-8664.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Background information. This direct final rule revises the 
Department's regulations, which are administered by BOEM, that contain 
a provision specifying that at least every 2 years, the Secretary of 
the Interior (Secretary) will publish a 5-year schedule of anticipated 
lease sales in section 585.150 of title 30 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations. Upon reviewing this regulation, the Department has 
determined that it should be rescinded because this schedule of 
anticipated lease sales is not mandated by the authorizing statute, the 
Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA), and unnecessarily limits the 
Secretary's discretion over scheduling renewable lease sales. Moreover, 
on January 20, 2025, President Trump invoked section 12(a) of OCSLA (43 
U.S.C. 1341(a)) to temporarily but indefinitely withdraw unleased areas 
on the OCS from wind leasing, and, because that withdrawal prevents 
future renewable energy leasing while it is in effect, it serves no 
purpose for the Department to publish a schedule of sales every 2 
years. The Department has determined that these reasons justify 
rescission of 30 CFR 585.150. The Department has no interest in 
maintaining a rule that is unnecessary.
    The Department has determined that this rule is not controversial 
and is administrative in nature and is therefore issuing this action as 
a direct final rule. Rescinding Sec.  585.150 does not prevent BOEM 
from publishing a schedule of renewable lease sales if the Secretary 
determines that such a schedule is warranted, and, indeed, BOEM had 
done so in the past before Sec.  585.150 was promulgated. Moreover, 
publication of a renewable lease sale schedule does not mandate that 
BOEM ultimately hold any particular lease sale. This rescission will be 
effective September 4, 2025 unless significant adverse comments are 
received by August 20, 2025. For purposes of this section, an adverse 
comment is one which explains why the rule would be inappropriate, 
including a challenge to the rule's underlying premise or approach, or 
why the rule would be ineffective or unacceptable without changes. 
Comments that are insubstantial or opinion only will not be considered 
adverse under this procedure. A comment recommending a rule change in 
addition to the rule will not be considered an adverse comment, unless 
there is a statement of why the rule would be unacceptable without the 
additional change.
    Organization of this document. The information in this preamble is 
organized as follows:

I. General Information
    A. Purpose of This Regulatory Action and Summary
    B. Does this action apply to me?
    C. Where can I get a copy of this document and other related 
information?
II. Background
    A. Statutory and Regulatory Authority
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
    A. Executive Order (E.O.) 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review, as 
Amended by Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory 
Review
    B. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
    C. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
    D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
    E. Executive Order 12630: Governmental Actions and Interference 
With Constitutionally Protected Property Rights
    F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
    G. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform
    H. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments
    I. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
    J. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
    K. Data Quality Act
    L. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
    M. Congressional Review Act (CRA)

I. General Information

A. Purpose of This Regulatory Action and Summary

    30 CFR 585.150 directs a schedule for publication of projected 
renewable energy lease sales. A projected schedule of lease sales is 
not mandated by the authorizing statute, the OCSLA. The Department does 
not wish to maintain unnecessary rules, and this section will be 
removed. This final action removes 30 CFR 585.150.

B. Does this action apply to me?

    30 CFR 585.150 does not regulate the public. This is an 
administrative change only and its removal does not affect any legal 
rights, obligations, or interests of any affected party.

C. Where can I get a copy of this document and other related 
information?

    In addition to being available in the docket, BOEM will post an 
electronic copy of this direct final rule at: <a href="https://www.boem.gov/about-boem/regulations-guidance/published-rules">https://www.boem.gov/about-boem/regulations-guidance/published-rules</a>.

II. Background

A. Statutory and Regulatory Authority

    Section 5 of OCSLA (43 U.S.C. 1334) authorizes the Secretary to 
issue regulations to administer leasing on the Outer Continental Shelf 
(OCS). Section 5(a) of OCSLA (43 U.S.C. 1334(a)) authorizes the 
Secretary to ``prescribe such rules and regulations as may be necessary 
to carry out [provisions of OCSLA]'' related to leasing on the OCS. 
Also, subsection 8(p)(8) of OCSLA (43 U.S.C. 1337(p)(8)) authorizes the 
Secretary to ``issue any necessary regulations to carry out this 
subsection.'' This rule only makes administrative changes to remove a 
section from part 585 of title 30 that does not regulate the public.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. Executive Order (E.O.) 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review, as 
Amended by Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory 
Review

    E.O. 12866 gives OMB the authority to review regulatory actions 
that are categorized as ``significant''; i.e., those actions that are 
likely to result in a rule that may:
    <bullet> Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or 
more or adversely affect in a material way the economy; a sector of the 
economy; productivity; competition; jobs; the environment; public 
health or safety; or state, local or tribal governments or communities;
    <bullet> Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with 
an action taken or planned by another agency;
    <bullet> Materially alter the budgetary impacts of entitlements, 
grants, user fees or loan programs or the rights and obligations of 
recipients thereof; or
    <bullet> Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal 
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in 
the Executive Order.
    E.O. 12866 provides that the Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) will review 
all significant

[[Page 37388]]

rules. OIRA has determined that this action is not a significant 
regulatory action, and therefore, it was not submitted to OMB for 
review.
    E.O. 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866 while calling for 
improvements in the Nation's regulatory system to promote 
predictability and reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, most 
innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends. 
E.O. 13563 directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches that 
reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for the 
public where these approaches are relevant, feasible, and consistent 
with regulatory objectives. BOEM has developed this rule in a manner 
consistent with these requirements.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    The RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, requires agencies to prepare a 
regulatory flexibility analysis for any rule subject to notice and 
comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act 
(APA) unless the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. The RFA generally requires 
agencies to analyze the economic impact of regulations when there is 
likely to be a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities and to consider regulatory alternatives that will 
achieve the agency's goals while minimizing the burden on small 
entities. This action will not have a significant economic impact on 
small entities under the RFA because it does not impose any 
requirements on small entities. The rescission of section 585.150 does 
not regulate the public.

C. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)

    The SBREFA, 5 U.S.C. 804(2), requires BOEM to perform a regulatory 
flexibility analysis, provide guidance, and help small businesses 
comply with statutes and regulations for major rulemakings. This action 
is not subject to the SBREFA because it: (1) does not have an annual 
effect on the economy of $100 million or more; (2) will not cause a 
major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, 
Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic regions; 
and (3) does not have significant adverse effects on competition, 
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of 
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
    BOEM anticipates the final rule would have neither significant 
employment nor small business impacts; nor cause major price increases 
for consumers, businesses, or governments; nor significantly degrade 
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the 
ability of U.S. businesses to compete against foreign businesses. The 
rule only rescinds a section that does not regulate the public.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce or otherwise determine compliance with Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman, and to the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Board. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of BOEM, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-
734-3247).

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    The UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, requires Federal agencies, unless 
otherwise prohibited by law, to assess the effects of regulatory 
actions on state, local and Tribal governments, and the private sector. 
Section 202 of UMRA generally requires Federal agencies to prepare a 
written statement, including a cost-benefit analysis, for each proposed 
and final rule with ``Federal mandates'' that may result in 
expenditures by state, local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate, 
or to the private sector of $100 million or more in any one year. BOEM 
has determined this action does not contain any unfunded mandate as 
described in UMRA 2, U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or 
uniquely affect small groups.
    The action imposes no enforceable duty on any State, local, or 
Tribal governments or the private sector.

E. Executive Order 12630: Governmental Actions and Interference With 
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights

    E.O. 12630 ensures that government actions affecting the use of 
private property are undertaken on a well-reasoned basis with due 
regard for the potential financial impacts imposed on the government. 
This action does not effect a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under E.O. 12630. A takings implication 
assessment is not required.

F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    E.O. 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 4, 1999) revoked and replaced E.O.s 
12612 (Federalism) and 12875 (Enhancing the Intergovernmental 
Partnership). E.O. 13132 took effect on November 2, 1999, and thus 
applies to actions published on or after November 2, 1999. Sections 3 
and 6 of E.O. 13132 apply to policies with federalism implications, 
defined in the Executive Order as including actions that have 
``substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between 
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.''
    Regulatory actions that have substantial direct effects on the 
States, on the relationship between the national government and the 
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government are subject to E.O. 13132. Under the 
criteria in section 1 of E.O. 13132, this rule does not have sufficient 
federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism 
summary impact statement. It will not have substantial direct effects 
on the states, on the relationship between the national government and 
the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among 
the various levels of government.

G. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform

    E.O. 12988 requires that rules:
    (1) Meet the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all 
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be 
written to minimize litigation; and
    (2) Meet the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all 
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal 
standards.
    This rule complies with the requirements of E.O. 12988.

H. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments

    The Department and BOEM strive to strengthen their government-to-
government relationships with Indian Tribes through a commitment to 
consultation with Indian Tribes and recognition of the Tribes' right to 
self-governance and Tribal sovereignty. BOEM evaluated this rule under 
the Department's consultation policy, Departmental Manual part 512, 
chapters 4 and 5, and E.O. 13175. BOEM determined that this rule has no 
substantial direct effects on federally recognized Indian Tribes or 
Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act Corporations and that consultation 
under existing Department and BOEM policies is not required.

[[Page 37389]]

I. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    This rule does not contain information collection requirements, and 
a submission to the OMB under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) is not 
required. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number.

J. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

    This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly 
affecting the quality of the human environment. A detailed 
environmental analysis under NEPA is not required because the final 
rule is covered by a categorical exclusion (see 43 CFR 46.205). This 
final rule meets the criteria set forth at 43 CFR 46.210(i) for a 
Departmental categorical exclusion in that this final rule is ``of an 
administrative, financial, legal, technical, or procedural nature.'' 
BOEM has also determined that the final rule does not involve any of 
the extraordinary circumstances listed in 43 CFR 46.215 that would 
require further analysis under NEPA.

K. Data Quality Act

    In promulgating this rule, BOEM did not conduct or use a study, 
experiment, or survey requiring peer review under the Data Quality Act 
(Pub. L. 106-554, app. C, sec. 515, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A-153-154). In 
accordance with the Data Quality Act, the Department has issued 
guidance regarding the quality of information that it relies upon for 
regulatory decisions. This guidance is available at the Department's 
website at: <a href="https://www.doi.gov/ocio/policy-mgmt-support/information-and-records-management/iq">https://www.doi.gov/ocio/policy-mgmt-support/information-and-records-management/iq</a>.

L. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    E.O. 13211 was issued on May 22, 2001, and requires Federal 
agencies to prepare a ``Statement of Energy Effects'' when undertaking 
certain regulatory actions. A Statement of Energy Effects describes the 
adverse effects of a ``significant energy action'' on energy supply, 
distribution and use; reasonable alternatives to the action; and the 
expected effects of the alternatives on energy supply, distribution and 
use.
    Under E.O. 13211, BOEM is required to prepare and submit to OMB a 
``Statement of Energy Effects'' for ``significant energy actions.'' 
This should include a detailed statement of any adverse effects on 
energy supply, distribution, or use (including a shortfall in supply, 
price increases, and increased use of foreign supplies) expected to 
result from the action and a discussion of reasonable alternatives and 
their effects. This action is not subject to E.O. 13211, because it is 
not a significant regulatory action under E.O. 12866.

M. Congressional Review Act (CRA)

    The CRA, 5 U.S.C. 801-808, established a mechanism to expedite 
congressional review of agency rules. The CRA generally provides that 
before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must 
submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House 
of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. It 
is important to note that the CRA applies only to final rules; it does 
not apply to proposed rules. BOEM generally submits a report containing 
the rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. 
House of Representatives and the Comptroller General of the United 
States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A 
``major rule'' cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published 
in the Federal Register or is submitted to Congress, whichever is 
later.
    This rule is exempt from the CRA because it is a rule of department 
organization, procedure or practice that does not substantially affect 
the rights or obligations of non-agency parties (5 U.S.C. 804(3)).

List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 585

    Administrative practice and procedure, Continental shelf, Energy, 
Marine resources, Natural resources, Renewable energy, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Rights-of-way.

    This action by the Assistant Secretary is taken pursuant to an 
existing delegation of authority.

Adam G. Suess,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Land and Minerals Management.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of the 
Interior amends 30 CFR part 585.150 as follows:

PART 585--RENEWABLE ENERGY ON THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF

0
1. The authority citation for part 585 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 43 U.S.C. 1337.

Subpart B--[Removed and reserved]

0
2. Remove and reserve subpart B.

[FR Doc. 2025-14805 Filed 8-4-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4340-98-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on August 5, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.