Notice2025-14666
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend MBSD Rule 33 (Suspension of Rules in Emergency Circumstances)
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
August 4, 2025
Issuing agencies
Securities and Exchange Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 147 (Monday, August 4, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 147 (Monday, August 4, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36492-36496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-14666]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-103584; File No. SR-FICC-2025-016]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
To Amend MBSD Rule 33 (Suspension of Rules in Emergency Circumstances)
July 30, 2025.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on July 23, 2025, Fixed Income Clearing
[[Page 36493]]
Corporation (``FICC'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
clearing agency. FICC filed the proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the
Proposed Rule Change
The proposed rule change consists of amendments to the FICC
Mortgage-Backed Securities Division (``MBSD'') Clearing Rules (``MBSD
Rules'') to (1) amend MBSD Rule 33 (Suspension of Rules in Emergency
Circumstances) and, (2) based on those amendments, update title cross-
references to MBSD Rule 33 in two locations of the MBSD Rules.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein are defined
in the MBSD Rules, as applicable, available at <a href="http://www.dtcc.com/legal/rules-and-procedures">http://www.dtcc.com/legal/rules-and-procedures</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis
for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the clearing agency included
statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule
change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule
change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places
specified in Item IV below. The clearing agency has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
(A) Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis
for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The proposed rule change would revise the MBSD Rules to (1) amend
MBSD Rule 33 (Suspension of Rules in Emergency Circumstances) and, (2)
based on those amendments, update title cross-references to MBSD Rule
33 in two locations of the MBSD Rules, as described in detail below.
(i) Background
MBSD Rule 33 authorizes FICC, in general, to waive, suspend, or
extend an MBSD Rule or a requirement under an MBSD Rule. However, MBSD
Rule 33 currently limits any waiver, extension or suspension of an MBSD
Rule to ``emergency circumstances'' and imposes several reporting
obligations on FICC when relying on the rule. More specifically, MBSD
Rule 33 requires (i) the existence of an ``emergency;'' (ii) the
waiver, suspension, or extension of the MBSD Rules to be necessary for
FICC to facilitate the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions and to provide FICC's services in a safe and
sound manner; (iii) notice to the Commission within two hours of FICC's
determination to extend, waive, or suspend an MBSD Rule, but no later
than one hour before the close of the Federal Reserve Banks' Fedwire
Funds Service if the action taken relates to a settlement extension on
the settlement day; (iv) a written report to be submitted to the
Commission no later than three calendar days after the implementation
of the extension, waiver or suspension of a rule, procedure, or
regulation issued by FICC; and (v) FICC to submit a proposed rule
change to the Commission, pursuant to Rule 19b-4 under the Act,\6\ if
the extension, waiver or suspension is to last for longer than 30
calendar days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Over time, FICC has come to realize that the extensive limitations
on the scope of MBSD Rule 33 and the considerable administrative
obligations imposed by the current requirements of the rule greatly
restrict FICC's ability to manage situations in MBSD that do not rise
to the level of an emergency but still require waiver, extension or
suspension of an MBSD Rule or a requirement under an MBSD Rule. Not
every situation in which FICC would need to waive, extend, or suspend
an MBSD Rule or a requirement under an MBSD Rule is an emergency, nor
would every waiver, extension or suspension necessarily support FICC's
prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities
transactions; yet, the absence of an emergency or support of clearance
and settlement means FICC may not rely on MBSD Rule 33 to help address
such a situation. Moreover, the current scope and regulatory reporting
requirements of MBSD Rule 33 are now more appropriately covered by MBSD
Rule 40 (Market Disruption and Force Majeure),\7\ which was adopted
after MBSD Rule 33.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ MBSD Rule 40, supra note 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MBSD Rule 40 addresses FICC's authority to take certain actions
upon the occurrence and during the pendency of a ``Market Disruption
Event,'' as defined in the rule. A Market Disruption Event includes,
for example, events that lead to the suspension or limitation of
trading or banking in the markets in which FICC operates, or the
unavailability or failure of any material payment, bank transfer, wire,
or security settlement system.\8\ In other words, the Market Disruption
Events covered by MBSD Rule 40 are essentially emergencies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Much like MBSD Rule 33, MBSD Rule 40 also imposes heightened
reporting obligations on FICC, given the emergency nature of Market
Disruption Events that would require use of MBSD Rule 40. Specifically,
if relying on MBSD Rule 40, the rule requires FICC to (i) attempt to
consult with the Commission prior to taking action under the rule; (ii)
advise the Commission by telephone, confirmed in writing, as soon as
practicable after taking such action; and (iii) promptly file a record
of that writing with FICC's corporate records, which shall be made
available for inspection by any FICC Member.\9\ Then, upon the ending
of the Market Disruption Event and the associated action taken under
MBSD Rule 40, the rule requires FICC to (A) advise the Commission of
such by telephone, confirmed in writing, as soon as practicable; and
(B) promptly file a record of that writing with FICC's corporate
records, which shall be made available for inspection by any
Member.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Id.
\10\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With the adoption of MBSD Rule 40 to address emergency situations,
MBSD now has two rules that address essentially the same situations;
yet, it lacks a rule to address situations that may not constitute
emergencies or relate to clearance and settlement, but still require
waiver, extension or suspension of an MBSD Rule or a requirement under
an MBSD Rule. As such, FICC proposes to amend MBSD Rule 33 to handle
situations that may not rise to the level of an emergency and may not
relate to clearance and settlement, but that still require a waiver,
extension or suspension of an MBSD Rule or a requirement under an MBSD
Rule. The proposed amendments would align with an existing rule of
FICC's Government Securities Division (``GSD''), as well as existing
rules of FICC's affiliate clearing agencies, National Securities
Clearing Corporation (``NSCC'') and The Depository Trust Company
(``DTC''), as discussed below.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ NSCC and DTC are affiliates of FICC under their parent
holding company, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 36494]]
(ii) Proposed Amendments to MBSD Rule 33
The proposed amendments to MBSD Rule 33 would eliminate the
requirements that (i) an ``emergency'' exists; (ii) any extension,
waiver or suspension of the MBSD Rules must be necessary for FICC to
facilitate the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions and providing FICC's services in a safe and
sound manner; (iii) notice be sent to the Commission within two hours
of FICC's determination to extend, waive or suspend an MBSD Rule, but
no later than one hour before the close of the Federal Reserve Banks'
Fedwire Funds Service if the action taken relates to a settlement
extension on the settlement day; (iv) a written report be submitted to
the Commission no later than three calendar days after the
implementation of the extension, waiver or suspension of a rule
(although, MBSD would still be required to make and maintain a similar
report, as discussed further below); (v) FICC submit a proposed rule
change to the Commission, pursuant to Rule 19b-4 under the Act,\12\ if
the extension, waiver or suspension is to last for longer than 30
calendar days; and (vi) the extension, waiver or suspension will not
remain in effect if the Commission notifies the Corporation in writing
that it objects to such extension, waiver or suspension.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed amendments to MBSD Rule 33 would add language to (i)
establish ``reasonable and appropriate'' as the new standard for when
an extension, waiver or suspension may occur; (ii) explain that an
extension, waiver or suspension may not continue in effect for more
than 60 calendar days unless such action is approved by FICC's Board of
Directors prior to the 60th day; (iii) require action under the rule to
be in consideration of FICC's obligations as a clearing agency, as
explained further below; and (iv) similar to the current reporting
requirement, require FICC to promptly make and maintain for inspection
by Members a report of any extension, waiver or suspension (other than
an extension of time of less than eight hours) stating the pertinent
facts, the identity of the person or persons who authorized the action,
and the reason such action was reasonable and appropriate. Finally, the
proposed rule change would update the title of MBSD Rule 33 to
``Extension, Waiver or Suspension of Rules'' and update two title
cross-references to MBSD Rule 33 in MBSD Rules 3 (Ongoing Membership
Requirements) and 3A (Cash Settling Bank Members), as described
below.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ MBSD Rules 3 and 3A, supra note 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As noted above, the proposed changes would align the language,
purpose, and governance of MBSD Rule 33 with the equivalent, existing
waiver, suspension, and extension rules of FICC GSD Rule 42,\14\ NSCC
Rule 22,\15\ and DTC Rule 18.\16\ Those equivalent rules do not require
emergency situations, a relationship to clearance and settlement, or
outreach to the Commission or the filing of a rule change where the
authority would last longer than 30 days. Instead, like MBSD, the rules
of GSD, NSCC, and DTC each include their own Market Disruption and
Force Majeure rules to manage emergency situations.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ FICC GSD Rulebook (``FICC GSD Rules''), available at
https://www.dtcc.com/~/media/Files/Downloads/legal/rules/
ficc_gov_rules.pdf.
\15\ NSCC Rules & Procedures (``NSCC Rules''), available at
https://dtcc.com/~/media/Files/Downloads/legal/rules/nscc_rules.pdf.
\16\ DTC Rules, By-laws and Organization Certificate (``DTC
Rules''), available at <a href="https://www.dtcc.com/-/media/Files/Downloads/legal/rules/dtc_rules.pdf">https://www.dtcc.com/-/media/Files/Downloads/legal/rules/dtc_rules.pdf</a>.
\17\ FICC GSD Rule 50, supra note 14; NSCC Rule 60, supra note
15; DTC Rule 38, supra note 16.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although the proposed changes to MBSD Rule 33 would not require
notification to the Commission, submission of a report to the
Commission, or a filing with the Commission if the exercised authority
would continue for more than 30 calendar days, as noted above, the
proposed modifications still would require FICC to write a report, as
described above, except for an extension of time of less than eight
hours. The report would need to include almost the same information
currently required by the rule, except the report would no longer
include the nature of the emergency because an emergency would no
longer be required, nor would it include why the action was necessary
to facilitate the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions and providing FICC's services in a safe and
sound manner because that necessity also would no longer be required.
FICC would be required to file the report in FICC's corporate records,
and make it available to Members for inspection. Moreover, the proposed
amendments would limit any exercised authority under MBSD Rule 33 to no
more than 60 calendar days, unless such action is approved by FICC's
Board of Directors prior to the 60th calendar day. Each of these
governance concepts are consistent with the corresponding GSD, NSCC,
and DTC rules noted above.
As described above, the proposed changes eliminate the requirement
that an emergency must exist and that any extension, waiver or
suspension must be necessary to facilitate the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities transactions. Instead, the
proposed changes introduce a ``reasonable and appropriate'' standard,
under which FICC may act to prevent, correct, mitigate or otherwise
address an event or situation that, if left unaddressed, could result
in a failure to satisfy a requirement of the MBSD Rules. The proposed
rule change also clarifies that such authority may not be used to
circumvent FICC's regulatory obligations provided under MBSD Rule 40 in
the event of a Market Disruption.
In determining whether to exercise the authority provided by the
proposed changes to MBSD Rule 33, the proposed rule text would require
FICC to consider its obligation to facilitate the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities transactions; to safeguard
securities and funds which are in its custody or control; and, in
general, to protect investors and the public interest. Examples of the
types of actions that may be considered reasonable and appropriate
include, but are not limited to, temporarily suspending margin charges
or extending margin submissions due to an operational error; extending
a payment deadline in cases where billing information is not readily
available to Members; waiving applicable charges related to processing
or submission failures that result from operational constraints; or
reversing fees assessed in connection with erroneous activity resulting
from misunderstanding of established procedures.
Note, though, any extension, waiver or suspension under the
proposed changes to MBSD Rule 33 could not be a permanent action, nor
would the rule permit extension, waiver or suspension of any regulatory
obligations of FICC.
The proposed changes to MBSD Rule 33, as described above, would
help ensure that MBSD is able to respond reasonably and appropriately
to situations that may not be emergencies and may not be related to
clearance and settlement but still require a waiver, suspension, or
extension of an MBSD Rule or a requirement under an MBSD Rule in the
same way that GSD, NSCC, and DTC can respond to such situations--
without the limited scope and administrative burdens currently
contained in MBSD Rule 33. This harmonization is important to help
ensure that both FICC divisions, as well as NSCC and DTC, can
consistently manage such situations that may apply
[[Page 36495]]
across multiple divisions, clearing agencies, or common members, while
still maintaining the authority and process to manage situations that
are emergencies under separate authority. That is, upon the occurrence
of a Market Disruption Event, as defined in MBSD Rule 40, and the need
for FICC to exercise the authority provided by MBSD Rule 40, the
process and authority set forth in MBSD Rule 40 would be followed.
2. Statutory Basis
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act requires that the rules of the
clearing agency be designed, inter alia, to assure the safeguarding of
securities and funds which are in the custody or control of the
clearing agency or for which it is responsible.\18\ FICC believes that
the proposed rule change is consistent with the Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of
the Act, as cited above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As described above, the proposed rule change would update MBSD Rule
33 to remove language that restricts the applicable scope of the rule
and certain regulatory reporting obligations to the Commission when the
rule is exercised. Meanwhile, the proposed rule change would add
language to MBSD Rule 33 to include a ``reasonable and appropriate''
use standard, limit any extension, waiver or suspension beyond 60 days
without engagement by FICC's Board of Directors but exclude the need
for a written report where an extension under the rule is for less than
eight hours. Finally, the proposed rule change would update two title
cross-references to MBSD Rule 33 in MBSD Rules 3 (Ongoing Membership
Requirements) and 3A (Cash Settling Bank Members).
The proposed rule change would help ensure that MBSD is able to
respond reasonably, appropriately, and effectively to situations that
may not constitute an emergency and may not involve FICC's clearance
and settlement of transactions but still require a waiver, suspension,
or extension of an MBSD Rule or obligation under an MBSD Rule. The
proposed changes also would enable MBSD to respond to such situations
in the same way that GSD, NSCC, and DTC can currently respond under
their respective rules, without the limited scope and administrative
reporting burdens currently contained in MBSD Rule 33, yet maintaining
the same governance structure that exists in those corresponding rules.
For Market Disruption Events, FICC would continue to rely on MBSD Rule
40 to help address such emergency situations. Additionally, updating
the two title cross-references to MBSD Rule 33 in the MBSD Rules helps
ensure the rules remain clear and accurate for Members.
Therefore, by helping to ensure that MBSD can respond more
efficiently and effectively to more situations that require a waiver,
suspension, or extension of an MBSD Rule or obligation under an MBSD
Rule, and helping to ensure that cross-references in the MBSD Rules
remain clear and accurate, FICC believes the proposed rule change would
help to assure the safeguarding of securities and funds which are in
the custody or control of FICC or for which it is responsible,
consistent with the requirements of the Act, in particular Section
17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act, cited above.
(B) Clearing Agency's Statement on Burden on Competition
FICC does not believe that the proposed rule change will have any
impact or impose any burden on competition because, as described above,
the proposed changes would not affect the rights and obligations of the
MBSD membership. Rather, the proposed changes would enable FICC to
employ MBSD Rule 33 more efficiently and effectively when responding to
situations that may not constitute an emergency or relate to clearance
and settlement, yet still require waiver, suspension, or extension of
an MBSD Rule or obligation under an MBSD Rule. As such, FICC believes
the proposed rule change would not have any impact on competition.
(C) Clearing Agency's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change
Received From Members, Participants, or Others
FICC has not received or solicited any written comments relating to
this proposal. If any written comments are received, FICC will amend
this filing to publicly file such comments as an Exhibit 2 to this
filing, as required by Form 19b-4 and the General Instructions thereto.
Persons submitting written comments are cautioned that, according
to Section IV (Solicitation of Comments) of the Exhibit 1A in the
General Instructions to Form 19b-4, the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from comment submissions. Commenters
should submit only information that they wish to make available
publicly, including their name, email address, and any other
identifying information.
All prospective commenters should follow the Commission's
instructions on How to Submit Comments, available at <a href="https://www.sec.gov/regulatory-actions/how-to-submit-comments">https://www.sec.gov/regulatory-actions/how-to-submit-comments</a>. General
questions regarding the rule filing process or logistical questions
regarding this filing should be directed to the Main Office of the
Commission's Division of Trading and Markets at
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2d595f4c4944434a4c4349404c5f4648595e6d5e484e034a425b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="97e3e5f6f3fef9f0f6f9f3faf6e5fcf2e3e4d7e4f2f4b9f0f8e1">[email protected]</span></a> or 202-551-5777.
FICC reserves the right to not respond to any comments received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change, and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not:
(i) significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest;
(ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and
(iii) become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was
filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \19\ and
Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\20\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
<bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/self-regulatory-organization-rulemaking">https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/self-regulatory-organization-rulemaking</a>);
or
<bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0b797e676e26686466666e657f784b786e68256c647d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="790b0c151c541a1614141c170d0a390a1c1a571e160f">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include
File Number SR-FICC-2025-016 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
<bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FICC-2025-016. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use
[[Page 36496]]
only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the
Commission's internet website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/self-regulatory-organization-rulemaking">https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/self-regulatory-organization-rulemaking</a>). Copies of the filing will be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of FICC
and on DTCC's website (<a href="http://www.dtcc.com/legal/sec-rule-filings">www.dtcc.com/legal/sec-rule-filings</a>). Do not
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-FICC-2025-016 and should be
submitted on or before August 25, 2025.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-14666 Filed 8-1-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on August 4, 2025.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.