Notice2025-14249

Certain Liquid Coolers for Electronic Components in Computers, Components Thereof, Devices for Controlling Same, and Products Containing Same; Notice of a Commission Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and a Cease and Desist Order; Termination of the Investigation

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
July 29, 2025

Issuing agencies

International Trade Commission

Abstract

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission ("Commission") has determined to affirm, with supplementary findings, the final initial determination ("ID") of the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ") finding a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337. The Commission has determined to issue a limited exclusion order prohibiting further importation of infringing products by the respondents and a cease and desist order as to one respondent.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 143 (Tuesday, July 29, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 29, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 35733]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-14249]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1394]


Certain Liquid Coolers for Electronic Components in Computers, 
Components Thereof, Devices for Controlling Same, and Products 
Containing Same; Notice of a Commission Determination Finding a 
Violation of Section 337; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and a 
Cease and Desist Order; Termination of the Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission (``Commission'') has determined to affirm, with 
supplementary findings, the final initial determination (``ID'') of the 
presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') finding a violation of 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337. The 
Commission has determined to issue a limited exclusion order 
prohibiting further importation of infringing products by the 
respondents and a cease and desist order as to one respondent.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward S. Jou, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3316. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may 
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at <a href="https://edis.usitc.gov">https://edis.usitc.gov</a>. For help accessing EDIS, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#de9b9a978ded96bbb2ae9eabadb7aabdf0b9b1a8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9bdedfd2c8a8d3fef7ebdbeee8f2eff8b5fcf4ed">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. General information concerning the Commission may 
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at <a href="https://www.usitc.gov">https://www.usitc.gov</a>. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on 
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal 
on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on March 21, 2024, based on a complaint filed on behalf of Cooler 
Master Co., Ltd. of Taiwan; CMI USA, Inc. of Claremont, California; and 
CMC Great USA, Inc. of San Jose, California (collectively, 
``Complainants''). 89 FR 20247-48 (Mar. 21, 2024). The complaint, as 
supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United 
States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States 
after importation of certain liquid coolers for electronic components 
in computers, components thereof, devices for controlling same, and 
products containing same by reason of infringement of claims 1-3 and 14 
of U.S. Patent No. 10,509,446 (``the '446 patent''); claims 1-4 of U.S. 
Patent No. 11,061,450 (``the '450 patent''); and the claim of U.S. 
Patent No. D856,941 (``the '941 design patent''). Id. The complaint 
further alleges that a domestic industry exists. Id. The Commission's 
notice of investigation named as respondents SilverStone Technology 
Co., Ltd. of Taiwan; SilverStone Technology, Inc. of Chino, California; 
Enermax Technology Corp. of Taiwan; Enermax USA of Chino, California; 
Shenzhen Apaltek Co., Ltd. of China; and Guangdong Apaltek Liquid 
Cooling Technology Co., Ltd. of China (collectively, ``Respondents''). 
Id. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is not participating in 
the investigation. Id.
    The '941 design patent was terminated from the investigation by 
withdrawal of the complaint. Order No. 7 (Sept. 6, 2024), unreviewed by 
Comm'n Notice (Sept. 30, 2024).
    A claim construction hearing was held on July 19, 2024, and a claim 
construction order issued on November 20, 2024. Order No. 10 (Nov. 20, 
2024). An evidentiary hearing was held on December 2-5, 2024.
    On March 21, 2025, the ALJ issued a final initial determination 
(``ID'') finding a violation of section 337 based on infringement of 
claims 1-3 and 14 of the '446 patent and claims 1-4 of the '450 patent. 
The ID included a recommended determination (``RD'') on remedy and 
bonding that recommended issuance of a limited exclusion order directed 
to the Respondents and a cease and desist order directed to one 
respondent. See ID at 142-43.
    On May 22, 2025, the Commission determined to review the ID in 
part. 90 FR 22755-56. The Commission solicited briefing from the 
parties regarding certain issues under review. Id. The parties filed 
initial submissions on June 4 and June 5, 2025, and the parties filed 
reply submissions on June 12, 2025.<SUP>1 2</SUP>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ On April 28, 2025, Respondents filed a motion for leave to 
correct a misstatement in Complainants' response to the petition for 
review, and on May 6, 2025, Complainants filed a response in 
opposition to the motion. In view of the additional briefing 
submitted by the parties on review, this motion is denied as moot.
    \2\ On June 19, 2025, Respondents moved for leave to file a 
corrected submission, and this motion was denied. See Respondents' 
Motion to Chair for Leave to File Corrected Submission at 1-2 (June 
19, 2025), denied by Letter from Office of the Secretary, EDIS Doc. 
ID 854638 (June 25, 2025).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Having reviewed the record of the investigation, including the 
ALJ's findings and the parties' submissions, the Commission has 
determined to affirm the ID's finding of a violation of section 337 and 
to supplement the ID with additional findings regarding the ``defining 
a heat exchange chamber'' claim limitation and the economic prong of 
the domestic industry requirement.
    The Commission has determined that the appropriate remedy is to 
issue a limited exclusion order prohibiting further importation of 
infringing products by the Respondents and a cease and desist order 
against Respondent SilverStone Technology, Inc.\3\ The Commission has 
determined that the public interest factors do not counsel against 
issuing remedial orders. The Commission has determined that bond should 
be set in the amount of zero percent (0%) of entered value (i.e., no 
bond).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The covered products in the remedial orders are liquid 
coolers for electronic components in computers, components thereof, 
and products containing same that infringe one or more of claims 1-3 
and 14 of the '446 patent or claims 1-4 of the '450 patent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission vote for this determination took place on July 24, 
2025.
    This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: July 24, 2025.
Susan Orndoff,
Supervisory Attorney.
[FR Doc. 2025-14249 Filed 7-28-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on July 29, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.