Notice2025-13894

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change to Temporarily Lower the Options Regulatory Fee (ORF)

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
July 24, 2025

Issuing agencies

Securities and Exchange Commission

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 140 (Thursday, July 24, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 140 (Thursday, July 24, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34939-34942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-13894]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-103507; File No. SR-NYSEAMER-2025-42]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change to 
Temporarily Lower the Options Regulatory Fee (ORF)

July 21, 2025.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (``Act''),\2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given 
that on July 16, 2025, NYSE American LLC (``NYSE American'' or the 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and 
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The 
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE American Options Fee 
Schedule (``Fee Schedule'') regarding the Options Regulatory Fee 
(``ORF''). The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's 
website at <a href="http://www.nyse.com">www.nyse.com</a> and at the principal office of the Exchange.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared 
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most 
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend the Fee Schedule to temporarily 
decrease the ORF from $0.0038 per contract to $0.0023 per contract, 
effective July 16, 2025.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ On July 1, 2025, the Exchange filed to amend the Fee 
Schedule (NYSEAMER-2025-39) and withdrew such filing on July 16, 
2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background
    As a general matter, the Exchange may only use regulatory funds 
such as the ORF ``to fund the legal, regulatory, and surveillance 
operations'' of the Exchange.\5\ More specifically, the ORF is designed 
to recover a material portion, but not all, of the Exchange's costs for 
the supervision and regulation of ATP Holders, including the Exchange's 
regulatory program and legal expenses associated with options 
regulation, such as the costs related to in-house staff, third-party 
service providers, and technology that facilitate regulatory functions 
such as surveillance, investigation, examinations, and enforcement 
(collectively, the ``ORF Costs''). ORF funds may also be used for 
indirect expenses such as human resources and other administrative 
costs. The Exchange monitors the amount of revenue collected from the 
ORF to ensure that this revenue, in combination with other regulatory 
fees and fines, does not exceed regulatory costs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Exchange considers surveillance operations part of 
regulatory operations. The limitation on the use of regulatory funds 
also provides that they shall not be distributed. See Thirteenth 
Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of NYSE American LLC, 
Article IV, Section 4.05 and Securities Exchange Act Release No. 
87993 (January 16, 2020), 85 FR 4050 (January 23, 2020) (SR-
NYSEAMER-2020-04).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The ORF is assessed on ATP Holders for options transactions that 
are cleared by the ATP Holder through the Options Clearing Corporation 
(``OCC'') in the Customer range regardless of the exchange on which the 
transaction occurs and is collected from ATP Holder clearing firms by 
the OCC on behalf of NYSE American.\6\ All options transactions must 
clear via a clearing firm and such clearing firms can then choose to 
pass through all, a portion, or none of the cost of the ORF to its 
customers, i.e., the entering firms. The Exchange notes that the costs 
relating to monitoring ATP Holders with respect to Customer trading 
activity are generally higher than the costs associated with monitoring 
ATP Holders that do not engage in Customer trading activity, which 
tends to be more automated and less labor-intensive. By contrast, 
regulating ATP Holders that engage in Customer trading activity is 
generally more labor intensive and requires a greater expenditure of 
human and technical resources as the Exchange needs to review not only 
the trading activity on behalf of Customers, but also the ATP Holder's 
relationship with its Customers via more labor-intensive exam-based 
programs.\7\ As a result, the costs associated with administering the 
customer component of the Exchange's overall regulatory program are 
materially higher than the costs associated with administering the non-
customer component (e.g., ATP Holder proprietary transactions) of its 
regulatory program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Fee Schedule, Section VII.A., Options Regulatory Fee 
(``ORF''), available here, <a href="https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/markets/american-options/NYSE_American_Options_Fee_Schedule.pdf">https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/markets/american-options/NYSE_American_Options_Fee_Schedule.pdf</a>. The 
Exchange uses reports from OCC when assessing and collecting the 
ORF. The ORF is not assessed on outbound linkage trades. An ATP 
Holder is not assessed the fee until it has satisfied applicable 
technological requirements necessary to commence operations on NYSE 
American. See id.
    \7\ The Exchange notes that many of the Exchange's market 
surveillance programs require the Exchange to look at and evaluate 
activity across all options markets, such as surveillance for 
position limit violations, manipulation, front-running, and contrary 
exercise advice violations/expiring exercise declarations. The 
Exchange and other options SROs are parties to a 17d-2 agreement 
allocating among the SROs regulatory responsibilities relating to 
compliance by the common members with rules for expiring exercise 
declarations, position limits, OCC trade adjustments, and Large 
Option Position Report reviews. See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act 
Release No. 85097 (February 11, 2019), 84 FR 4871 (February 19, 
2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Because the ORF is based on options transactions volume, the amount 
of ORF collected is variable. For example, if options transactions 
reported to OCC in a given month increase, the ORF collected from ATP 
Holders will likely increase as well. Similarly, if options 
transactions reported to OCC in a given month decrease, the ORF 
collected from

[[Page 34940]]

ATP Holders will likely decrease as well. Accordingly, the Exchange 
monitors the amount of ORF collected to ensure that it does not exceed 
a material portion of ORF Costs. If the Exchange determines the amount 
of ORF collected exceeds or may exceed a material portion of ORF Costs, 
the Exchange will, as appropriate, adjust the ORF by submitting a fee 
change filing to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 
``Commission''). Exchange rules establish that market participants must 
be notified of any change in the ORF via Trader Update at least 30 
calendar days prior to the effective date of the change.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Fee Schedule, supra note 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposed Rule Change
    Based on the Exchange's recent review of regulatory costs, ORF 
collections, and options transaction volume, the Exchange proposes to 
temporarily decrease the amount of ORF collected from $0.0038 per 
contract to $0.0023 per contract, effective July 1, 2025.\9\ This 
proposed decrease will help ensure that the amount collected from the 
ORF, in combination with other regulatory fees and fines, does not 
exceed the Exchange's total regulatory costs. On May 30, 2025, the 
Exchange notified ATP Holders of the proposed change via Trader Update 
(i.e., at least 30 calendar days prior to the July 1st operative date) 
to afford market participants sufficient opportunity to configure their 
systems to account properly for the modified ORF.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ The Exchange proposes to have an automatic sunset of the 
proposed fee on December 31, 2025. See proposed Fee Schedule, 
Section VII.A., Options Regulatory Fee (``ORF'').
    \10\ See <a href="https://www.nyse.com/trader-update/history#110000949347">https://www.nyse.com/trader-update/history#110000949347</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed change to the ORF is based on the Exchange's analysis 
of recent options volumes and its regulatory costs. The Exchange 
believes that, if the ORF is not adjusted, the ORF revenue to the 
Exchange year over year could exceed a material portion of the 
Exchange's ORF Costs. Over the past few years, the options industry has 
experienced high options trading volumes and volatility and, although 
the Exchange waived the ORF for the last two months of 2024,\11\ the 
persisting increased options volumes have impacted the Exchange's ORF 
collection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 101866 (December 
10, 2024), 89 FR 101674 (December 16, 2024) (SR-NYSEAMER-2024-63) 
(Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule 
Change To Amend the NYSE American Options Fee Schedule To Modify the 
Options Regulatory Fee).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The table below reflects industry data from OCC and illustrates 
that both total average daily volume and customer average daily volume 
in 2025 increased over the already elevated levels in 2023 and 
2024.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ The OCC publishes options and futures volume in a variety 
of formats, including daily and monthly volume by exchange, 
available here: <a href="https://www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-Data-Reports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/Monthly-Weekly-Volume-Statistics">https://www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-Data-Reports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/Monthly-Weekly-Volume-Statistics</a>. 
The volume discussed in this filing is based on a compilation of OCC 
data for monthly volume of equity-based options and monthly volume 
of ETF-based options, in contract sides.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                2023               2024             2025 YTD
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Customer ADV...........................................         35,327,417         39,365,049         46,831,086
Total ADV..............................................         40,368,590         44,360,426         53,043,204
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, as shown in the table below, during 2025, options 
trading volumes have remained elevated and volatility has 
persisted.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See id.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Jan. 2025          Feb. 2025          Mar. 2025          Apr. 2025           May 2025
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Customer ADV.............................................         46,758,284         48,508,333         46,281,134         47,786,196         46,234,519
Total ADV................................................         53,134,932         54,563,396         53,182,376         55,339,630         51,351,579
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Because of the sustained impact of the trading volumes that have 
persisted through mid-2025, along with the difficulty of predicting 
whether and when volumes may return to historical levels, the Exchange 
proposes to temporarily decrease the ORF from July 1 through December 
31, 2025, to help ensure that ORF collection will not exceed ORF Costs 
for 2025.\14\ The Exchange cannot predict whether options volumes will 
remain at these levels going forward and projections for future 
regulatory costs are estimated, preliminary, and may change. However, 
the Exchange believes that the proposed change to the ORF would allow 
the Exchange to continue to monitor the amount collected from the ORF 
to help ensure that ORF collection, in combination with other 
regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed regulatory costs for 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ After December 31, 2025, the Exchange proposes that the ORF 
rate automatically revert to $0.0038 per contract (the ``sunset 
provision''). See proposed Fee Schedule, Section VII.A., Options 
Regulatory Fee (``ORF'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Potential ORF Reform
    The Exchange appreciates the evolving changes in the markets and 
regulatory environment and, in connection with industry and other 
feedback, has been evaluating the current methodologies and practices 
for the assessment and collection of ORF. The Exchange believes ORF 
reform is appropriate, including moving to a model in which ORF would 
be assessed only to transactions occurring on the Exchange. This would 
allow for consistent industry billing. The Exchange is committed to 
switching to a new, modified model as soon as a consistent framework 
has been established with the SEC, adopted by all the options 
exchanges, and necessary regulatory filings submitted. Until that time, 
the Exchange believes it is fair and reasonable to temporarily decrease 
the current ORF under the existing model.
    The Exchange also believes that the potential for ORF reform 
provides further support for the sunset provision included in this 
proposal because it will allow the Exchange to discuss its anticipated, 
or potential alternative, ORF methodology with ATP Holders between July 
1 and December 31, 2025 (i.e., the sunset date).\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ The Exchange notes that the existence of the proposed 
sunset date would not preclude the Exchange from filing to modify 
its ORF methodology prior to that date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with the provisions of Section 6(b) \16\ of the Act, in general, and 
Section 6(b)(4) and

[[Page 34941]]

(5) \17\ of the Act, in particular, in that it is designed to provide 
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other 
charges among its members and other persons using its facilities and 
does not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers, or 
dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Proposal Is Reasonable
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is reasonable 
because it would help ensure that collections from the ORF do not 
exceed a material portion of the Exchange's ORF Costs. As noted above, 
the ORF is designed to recover a material portion, but not all, of the 
Exchange's ORF Costs.
    Although there can be no assurance that the Exchange's final costs 
for 2025 will not differ materially from its expectations and prior 
practice, nor can the Exchange predict with certainty whether options 
volume will remain at current or similar levels going forward, the 
Exchange believes that the amount collected based on the current ORF 
rate, when combined with regulatory fees and fines, may result in 
collections in excess of the estimated ORF Costs for the year. 
Particularly, as noted above, the options market has continued to 
experience elevated volumes and volatility in 2025, thereby resulting 
in higher ORF collections than projected. The Exchange therefore 
believes that the proposed temporary decrease to the ORF is reasonable 
because it would help ensure that ORF collection does not exceed the 
ORF Costs for 2025. Particularly, the Exchange believes that this 
temporary reduction in the ORF, taken together with the Exchange's 
other regulatory fees and fines, would allow the Exchange to continue 
covering a material portion of ORF Costs, while lessening the potential 
for generating excess funds that may otherwise occur using the current 
rate. Per the sunset provision, the Exchange proposes to resume 
assessing its current ORF (i.e., $0.0038 per contract) after December 
31, 2025. The Exchange believes that resumption of the ORF at the 
current rate on January 1, 2026 (unless the Exchange determines it 
necessary to adjust the ORF rate to help ensure that ORF collections do 
not exceed ORF Costs) is reasonable because it would permit the 
Exchange to resume collecting an ORF that is designed to recover a 
material portion, but not all, of the Exchange's projected ORF Costs. 
The Exchange's proposal to revert to its current ORF rate after 
December 31, 2025 is based on the Exchange's estimated projections for 
its regulatory costs, which are currently projected to increase in 
2026, balanced with the increase in options volumes that has persisted 
into 2025 and that may continue into 2026.
    The Exchange will continue to monitor ORF Costs in advance of the 
sunset date (i.e., December 31, 2025) and, if necessary, based on 
projected volumes and ORF Costs, will adjust the ORF rate to help 
ensure that ORF collections would not exceed a material portion of ORF 
Costs, adjust the ORF by submitting a proposed rule change and 
notifying ATP Holders of such change by Trader Update.
The Proposal Is an Equitable Allocation of Fees
    The Exchange believes its proposal is an equitable allocation of 
fees among its market participants. The Exchange believes that the 
proposed rule change would not place certain market participants at an 
unfair disadvantage because it would apply equally to all ATP Holders 
on all their transactions that clear in the Customer range at the OCC 
and would allow the Exchange to continue to monitor the amount 
collected from the ORF to help ensure that ORF collection, in 
combination with other regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed 
regulatory costs. The Exchange also believes that reverting to the 
existing ORF after December 31, 2025, unless the Exchange determines it 
necessary to adjust the ORF to ensure that ORF collections do not 
exceed a material portion of ORF Costs, is equitable because the ORF 
would continue to apply equally to all ATP Holders on options 
transactions in the Customer range, at a rate designed to recover a 
material portion, but not all, of the Exchange's projected ORF Costs, 
based on current projections that such costs will increase in 2026.
The Proposed Fee Is Not Unfairly Discriminatory
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is not unfairly 
discriminatory. The Exchange believes that the proposed temporary 
decrease to the ORF rate would not place certain market participants at 
an unfair disadvantage because it would apply to all ATP Holders 
subject to the ORF and would allow the Exchange to continue to monitor 
the amount collected from the ORF to help ensure that ORF collection, 
in combination with other regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed 
regulatory costs. The Exchange also has provided all such ATP Holders 
with 30 days' advance notice of the planned change to the ORF. Further, 
the Exchange believes that reverting to the existing ORF after December 
31, 2025 (i.e., the sunset date), unless the Exchange determines it 
necessary to adjust the ORF to ensure that ORF collections do not 
exceed a material portion of ORF Costs, is not unfairly discriminatory 
because the Exchange would resume assessing the ORF (at its current 
rate) equally to all ATP Holders based on their transactions that clear 
in the Customer range at the OCC.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
    Intramarket Competition. The Exchange believes the proposed change 
would not impose an undue burden on intramarket competition because the 
ORF is charged to all ATP Holders on all their transactions that clear 
in the Customer range at the OCC; thus, the amount of ORF imposed is 
based on the amount of Customer volume transacted. The Exchange 
believes that the proposed temporary decrease of the ORF would not 
place certain market participants at an unfair disadvantage because all 
options transactions must clear via a clearing firm. Such clearing 
firms can then choose to pass through all, a portion, or none of the 
cost of the ORF to its customers, i.e., the entering firms. The ORF is 
collected from ATP Holder clearing firms by the OCC on behalf of the 
Exchange and is assessed on all options transactions cleared at the OCC 
in the Customer range.
    The Exchange also believes that reverting to the existing ORF after 
December 31, 2025 (i.e., the sunset date)--unless the Exchange 
determines it necessary at that time to adjust the ORF to ensure that 
ORF collections do not exceed a material portion of ORF Costs--would 
not impose an undue burden on competition because it would permit the 
Exchange to resume assessing an ORF that is designed to recover a 
material portion, but not all, of the Exchange's projected ORF Costs, 
based on current projections that such costs will increase in 2026. As 
is the case today, the proposed reduced ORF rate would apply to all ATP 
Holders on their options transactions that clear in the Customer range 
at the OCC, which rate will automatically revert to the current ORF 
rate after December 31, 2025.
    Intermarket Competition. The proposed fee change is not designed to 
address any competitive issues. Rather, the proposed change is designed 
to help the Exchange adequately fund its regulatory activities while 
seeking to

[[Page 34942]]

ensure that total collections from regulatory fees do not exceed total 
regulatory costs.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \18\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \19\ 
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed 
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to 
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or 
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \19\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

    <bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
    <bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#295b5c454c044a4644444c475d5a695a4c4a074e465f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c5b7b0a9a0e8a6aaa8a8a0abb1b685b6a0a6eba2aab3">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. Please include 
file number SR-NYSEAMER-2025-42 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

    <bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSEAMER-2025-42. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). Copies of the filing will be available for inspection and 
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include 
personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit 
only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may 
redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material 
that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions 
should refer to file number SR-NYSEAMER-2025-42 and should be submitted 
on or before August 14, 2025.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-13894 Filed 7-23-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on July 24, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.