Rule2025-13411

Rescission of Regulations Regarding Mineral Locations Within National Forest Wilderness

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
July 17, 2025
Effective
September 15, 2025

Issuing agencies

Interior DepartmentLand Management Bureau

Abstract

This direct final rule rescinds a portion of the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) regulations addressing mineral locations within National Forest System lands.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 135 (Thursday, July 17, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 135 (Thursday, July 17, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33321-33323]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-13411]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

43 CFR Part 3820

[Docket Number BLM-2025-0012; PO #4820000251; Order #02412-014-004-
047181.0]
RIN 1004-AF10


Rescission of Regulations Regarding Mineral Locations Within 
National Forest Wilderness

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Direct final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This direct final rule rescinds a portion of the Bureau of 
Land Management's (BLM) regulations addressing mineral locations within 
National Forest System lands.

DATES: The final rule is effective September 15, 2025, unless 
significant adverse comments are received by August 18, 2025. If 
significant adverse comments are received, notice will be published in 
the Federal Register before the effective date either withdrawing the 
rule or issuing a new final rule that responds to any significant 
adverse comments.

[[Page 33322]]


ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by one of the following methods:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. 
In the Search box, enter the Docket Number ``BLM-2025-0012'' and click 
the ``Search'' button. Follow the instructions at this website.
    <bullet> Mail, Personal, or Messenger Delivery: U.S. Department of 
the Interior, Director (630), Bureau of Land Management, 1849 C St. NW, 
Room 5646, Washington, DC 20240, Attention: 1004-AF10.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kirk Rentmeister, National Mining Law 
Program Lead, telephone: 775-435-5514; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#741f06111a0019111d341618195a131b02"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="503b22353e243d353910323c3d7e373f26">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. 
Individuals in the United States who are deaf, deafblind, hard of 
hearing, or have a speech disability may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or 
TeleBraille) to access telecommunications relay services. Individuals 
outside the United States should use the relay services offered within 
their country to make international calls to the point-of-contact in 
the United States.
    For a summary of the final rule, please see the abstract 
description of the document in Docket Number BLM-2025-0012 on 
<a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of the Interior's 
(Department) regulations governing mineral locations within National 
Forest System lands are contained in 43 CFR 3823.2(a) through (c). 
Paragraph (a) states that the mining laws apply within National Forest 
System lands until December 31, 1983. Paragraph (b) allows mining 
locations established after September 3, 1964, to be held and used for 
mining and processing operations. Paragraph (c) directs those persons 
wishing to conduct activities under paragraph (b) to review the 
regulations of the United States Forest Service applicable to the lands 
within which such activities would be undertaken. The Department is 
rescinding these regulations as paragraph (a) is obsolete, while 
paragraphs (b) and (c) are duplicative of the regulations issued by the 
United States Forest Service, which can be found at 36 CFR part 228.
    The Department has determined that for these reasons justify 
rescission of 43 CFR 3823.2. The Department has no interest in 
maintaining rules that are obsolete or needlessly duplicative of other 
existing regulations.
    The Department is issuing this rule as a direct final rule. 
Although the Administrative Procedure Act (APA, 5 U.S.C. 551-559) 
generally requires agencies to engage in notice and comment rulemaking, 
section 553 of the APA provides an exception when the agency ``for good 
cause finds'' that notice and comment are ``impracticable, unnecessary, 
or contrary to the public interest.'' Id. section 553(b)(B). The 
Department has determined that notice and comment are unnecessary 
because this rule is noncontroversial; of a minor, technical nature; 
involves little agency discretion; and is unlikely to receive any 
significant adverse comments. Significant adverse comments are those 
that oppose the rescission of the rule and raise, alone or in 
combination, (1) reasons why the rescission of the rule is 
inappropriate, including challenges to the rescission's underlying 
premise; or (2) serious unintended consequences of the rescission. A 
comment recommending an addition to the rule will not be considered 
significant and adverse unless the comment explains how this direct 
final rule would be ineffective without the addition.

Procedural Matters

Executive Order (E.O.) 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review and E.O. 
13563--Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    E.O. 12866 provides that the Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) will review 
all significant rules. OIRA has determined that this rule is not 
significant.
    E.O. 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866, while calling 
for improvements in the Nation's regulatory system to promote 
predictability, reduce uncertainty, and use the best, most innovative, 
and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends. E.O. 13563 
directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches that reduce burdens 
and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for the public where 
these approaches are relevant, feasible, and consistent with regulatory 
objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes further that agencies must base 
regulations on the best available science and that the rulemaking 
process must allow for public participation and an open exchange of 
ideas. The Department developed this rule in a manner consistent with 
these requirements.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601 through 612) 
requires an agency to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis for all 
rules unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
The RFA applies only to rules for which an agency is required to first 
publish a proposed rule. See 5 U.S.C. 603(a) and 604(a). As the 
Department is not required to publish a notice of proposed rulemaking 
for this direct final rule, the RFA does not apply.

Congressional Review Act

    This rule is not a major rule under the Congressional Review Act, 5 
U.S.C. 804(2). Specifically, the direct final rule: (a) will not have 
an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; (b) will not 
cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual 
industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic 
regions; and (c) will not have significant adverse effects on 
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on 
the ability of United States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-
based enterprises in domestic and export markets.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or 
Tribal governments, or the private sector, of more than $100 million 
per year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on 
State, local, or Tribal governments, or the private sector. The rule 
merely revises the Federal regulations to remove an obsolete provision 
that is no longer used. Therefore, a statement containing the 
information required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 
et seq.) is not required.

E.O. 12630--Governmental Actions and Interference With Constitutionally 
Protected Property Rights

    This rule does not result in a taking of private property or 
otherwise have regulatory takings implications under E.O. 12630. The 
rule rescinds an obsolete regulatory provision; therefore, the rule 
will not result in private property being taken for public use without 
just compensation. A takings implication assessment is therefore not 
required.

E.O. 13132--Federalism

    Under the criteria of section 1 of E.O. 13132, this rule does not 
have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a 
federalism summary impact statement. This rule will not have 
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between 
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government. A 
federalism summary impact statement is not required.

[[Page 33323]]

E.O. 12988--Civil Justice Reform

    This direct final rule complies with the requirements of E.O. 
12988. Among other things, this rule:
    (a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all 
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be 
written to minimize litigation;
    (b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all 
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal 
standards.

E.O. 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal 
Governments

    The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its 
government-to-government relationship with Indian tribes through a 
commitment to consultation with Tribes and recognition of their right 
to self-governance and Tribal sovereignty. The Department evaluated 
this direct final rule under E.O. 13175 and the Department's 
consultation policies and determined that it has no substantial, direct 
effects on federally recognized Indian tribes and that consultation 
under the Department's Tribal consultation policies is not required. 
The rule merely revises the Federal regulations to remove unnecessary 
regulatory language.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    OMB previously approved the information collection activities 
contained in the existing regulations and assigned OMB Control Number 
1004-0114. This rule does not impose any new or materially revised 
information collection requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act 
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), and a submission to the Office of Management 
and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act is not required.

National Environmental Policy Act

    This direct final rule does not constitute a major Federal action 
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. A 
detailed statement under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA, 
42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) is not required because this rule is covered by 
a categorical exclusion applicable to regulatory functions ``that are 
of an administrative, financial, legal, technical, or procedural 
nature.'' 43 CFR 46.210(i). In addition, the Department has determined 
that this rule does not involve any of the extraordinary circumstances 
listed in 43 CFR 46.215 that would require further analysis under NEPA.

E.O. 13211--Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect 
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This direct final rule is not a significant energy action as 
defined in E.O. 13211. Therefore, a Statement of Energy Effects is not 
required.

List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 3820

    Mines, National forests, Public lands--mineral resources, Reporting 
and recordkeeping requirements, Wilderness areas.

Adam G. Suess,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Land and Minerals Management.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Bureau of Land 
Management amends 43 CFR part 3820 as follows:

PART 3820--AREAS SUBJECT TO SPECIAL MINING LAWS

0
1. The authority citation for part 3820 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  30 U.S.C. 22 et seq.; 43 U.S.C. 1201; 43 U.S.C. 
1740; 62 Stat. 162.

Subpart 3823--Prospecting, Mineral Locations, and Mineral Patents 
Within National Forest Wilderness


Sec.  3823.2  [Removed]

0
2. Remove Sec.  3823.2.

[FR Doc. 2025-13411 Filed 7-16-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4331-29-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on July 17, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.