Rule2025-13397
Rescission of Regulations Regarding Mining Claim Payments
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
July 17, 2025
Effective
September 15, 2025
Issuing agencies
Interior DepartmentLand Management Bureau
Abstract
This direct final rule rescinds a portion of the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) regulations that authorize declining balance accounts with the BLM concerning mining claims.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 135 (Thursday, July 17, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 135 (Thursday, July 17, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33328-33330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-13397]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
43 CFR Part 3830
[Docket No. BLM-2025-0013; PO #4820000251; Order #02412-014-004-
047181.0]
RIN 1004-AF12
Rescission of Regulations Regarding Mining Claim Payments
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Direct final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This direct final rule rescinds a portion of the Bureau of
Land Management's (BLM) regulations that authorize declining balance
accounts with the BLM concerning mining claims.
DATES: The final rule is effective September 15, 2025, unless
significant adverse comments are received by August 18, 2025. If
significant adverse comments are received, notice will be published in
the Federal Register before the effective date either withdrawing the
rule or issuing a new final rule that responds to significant adverse
comments.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by one of the following methods:
<bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>.
In the Search box, enter the Docket Number ``BLM-2025-0013'' and click
the ``Search'' button. Follow the instructions at this website.
<bullet> Mail, Personal, or Messenger Delivery: U.S. Department of
the Interior, Director (630), Bureau of Land Management, 1849 C St. NW,
Room 5646, Washington, DC 20240, Attention: 1004-AF12.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kirk Rentmeister, National Mining Law
Program Lead, telephone: 775-435-5514; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6b00190e051f060e022b090706450c041d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="214a53444f554c444861434d4c0f464e57">[email protected]</span></a>.
Individuals in the United States who are deaf, deafblind, hard of
hearing, or have a speech disability may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or
TeleBraille) to access telecommunications relay services. Individuals
outside the United States should use the relay services offered within
their country to make international calls to the point-of-contact in
the United States.
[[Page 33329]]
For a summary of the final rule, please see the abstract
description of the document in Docket Number BLM-2025-0013 on
<a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of the Interior's
(Department) regulations implementing the requirements of 30 U.S.C. 28f
through 28k are contained in 43 CFR subpart D--BLM Service Charge and
Fees. This subpart sets out the fees required for mining claims,
millsites, and tunnel sites. 43 CFR 3830.23 sets out the types of
payments the BLM will accept for the required charges and fees. Section
3830.23(a)(5) authorizes claimants to maintain declining balance
accounts with the BLM State Office where the mining claim is recorded
and allows claimants to authorize the BLM to deduct from such accounts
service charges and fees or to add overpayments to such accounts.
Because mining claimants are not using declining balance accounts, the
BLM is rescinding this regulation as unnecessary and obsolete.
The Department has determined that this reason, independently and
alone, justifies rescission of 43 CFR 3830.23(a)(5), including
paragraphs (a)(5)(i) and (a)(5)(ii). The Department has no interest in
maintaining a rule that is not used.
The Department is issuing this rule as a direct final rule.
Although the Administrative Procedure Act (APA, 5 U.S.C. 551-559)
generally requires agencies to engage in notice and comment rulemaking,
section 553 of the APA provides an exception when the agency ``for good
cause finds'' that notice and comment are ``impracticable, unnecessary,
or contrary to the public interest.'' Id. section 553(b)(B). The
Department has determined that notice and comment are unnecessary
because this rule is noncontroversial; of a minor, technical nature;
involves little agency discretion; and is unlikely to receive any
significant adverse comments. Significant adverse comments are those
that oppose the rescission of the rule and raise, alone or in
combination, (1) reasons why the rescission of the rule is
inappropriate, including challenges to the rescission's underlying
premise; or (2) serious unintended consequences of the rescission. A
comment recommending an addition to the rule will not be considered
significant and adverse unless the comment explains how this direct
final rule would be ineffective without the addition.
Procedural Matters
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review and E.O.
13563--Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
E.O. 12866 provides that the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) will review
all significant rules. OIRA has determined that this rule is not
significant.
E.O. 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866, while calling
for improvements in the Nation's regulatory system to promote
predictability, reduce uncertainty, and use the best, most innovative,
and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends. E.O. 13563
directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches that reduce burdens
and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for the public where
these approaches are relevant, feasible, and consistent with regulatory
objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes further that agencies must base
regulations on the best available science and that the rulemaking
process must allow for public participation and an open exchange of
ideas. The Department developed this rule in a manner consistent with
these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601 through 612)
requires an agency to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis for all
rules unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The RFA applies only to rules for which an agency is required to first
publish a proposed rule. See 5 U.S.C. 603(a) and 604(a). As the
Department is not required to publish a notice of proposed rulemaking
for this direct final rule, the RFA does not apply.
Congressional Review Act
This rule is not a major rule under the Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 804(2). Specifically, the direct final rule: (a) will not have
an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; (b) will not
cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual
industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic
regions; and (c) will not have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on
the ability of United States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-
based enterprises in domestic and export markets.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
Tribal governments, or the private sector, of more than $100 million
per year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on
State, local, or Tribal governments, or the private sector. The rule
merely revises the Federal regulations to remove an obsolete provision
that is no longer used. Therefore, a statement containing the
information required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531
et seq.) is not required.
E.O. 12630--Governmental Actions and Interference With Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights
This rule does not result in a taking of private property or
otherwise have regulatory takings implications under E.O. 12630. The
rule rescinds an obsolete regulatory provision; therefore, the rule
will not result in private property being taken for public use without
just compensation. A takings implication assessment is therefore not
required.
E.O. 13132--Federalism
Under the criteria of section 1 of E.O. 13132, this rule does not
have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
federalism summary impact statement. This rule will not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government. A
federalism summary impact statement is not required.
E.O. 12988--Civil Justice Reform
This direct final rule complies with the requirements of E.O.
12988. Among other things, this rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be
written to minimize litigation;
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
E.O. 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its
government-to-government relationship with Indian tribes through a
commitment to consultation with Tribes and recognition of their right
to self-governance and Tribal sovereignty. The
[[Page 33330]]
Department evaluated this direct final rule under E.O. 13175 and the
Department's consultation policies and determined that it has no
substantial, direct effects on federally recognized Indian tribes and
that consultation under the Department's Tribal consultation policies
is not required. The rule merely revises the Federal regulations to
remove unnecessary regulatory language.
Paperwork Reduction Act
OMB previously approved the information collection activities
contained in the existing regulations and assigned OMB Control Number
1004-0114. This rule does not impose any new or materially revised
information collection requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), and a submission to the Office of Management
and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This direct final rule does not constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. A
detailed statement under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA,
42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) is not required because this rule is covered by
a categorical exclusion applicable to regulatory functions ``that are
of an administrative, financial, legal, technical, or procedural
nature.'' 43 CFR 46.210(i). In addition, the Department has determined
that this rule does not involve any of the extraordinary circumstances
listed in 43 CFR 46.215 that would require further analysis under NEPA.
E.O. 13211--Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
This direct final rule is not a significant energy action as
defined in E.O. 13211. Therefore, a Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
List of Subjects for 43 CFR Part 3830
Mineral royalties, Mines, Public lands--mineral resources,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Adam G. Suess,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Land and Minerals Management.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Bureau of Land
Management amends 43 CFR part 3830 as follows:
PART 3830--LOCATING, RECORDING, AND MAINTAINING MINING CLAIMS OR
SITES; GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 3830 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 18 U.S.C. 1001, 3571; 30 U.S.C. 22, 28, 28k, 242,
611; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 43 U.S.C. 2, 1201, 1212, 1457, 1474; 115 Stat.
414; Pub. L. 112-74, 125 Stat. 786.
Subpart D--BLM Service Charge and Fee Requirements
0
2. Revise Sec. 3830.23 to read as follows:
Sec. 3830.23 What types of payment will BLM accept?
(a) BLM will accept the following types of payments:
(1) U.S. currency;
(2) Postal money order payable in U.S. dollars to the Department of
the Interior--Bureau of Land Management;
(3) Check or other negotiable instrument payable in U.S. dollars to
the Department of the Interior--Bureau of Land Management; or
(4) Valid credit card that is acceptable to the BLM.
(b) If the issuing institution of your check, negotiable
instrument, or credit card refuses to pay and it is not because the
institution made a mistake, BLM will treat the service charges and fees
as unpaid.
[FR Doc. 2025-13397 Filed 7-16-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4331-29-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on July 17, 2025.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.