Rule2025-13317
Triclopyr; Pesticide Tolerances
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
July 16, 2025
Effective
July 16, 2025
Issuing agencies
Environmental Protection Agency
Abstract
This regulation establishes a tolerance for residues of triclopyr, including its metabolites and degradates, in or on orange subgroup 10-10A. UPL Chile S.A. requested this tolerance under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 134 (Wednesday, July 16, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 134 (Wednesday, July 16, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31890-31894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-13317]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2024-0331; FRL-12856-01-OCSPP]
Triclopyr; Pesticide Tolerances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a tolerance for residues of
triclopyr, including its metabolites and degradates, in or on orange
subgroup 10-10A. UPL Chile S.A. requested this tolerance under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective July 16, 2025. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before September 15, 2025,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2024-0331, is available online at
<a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> or in-person at the Office of Pesticide
Programs Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson
Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Public Reading Room and the OPP Docket is (202) 566-
1744. For the latest status information on EPA/DC services, docket
access, visit <a href="https://www.epa.gov/">https://www.epa.gov/</a>.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Smith, Director, Registration
Division (7505T), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-
0001; main telephone number: (202) 566-1030; email address:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#42100604100c2d362b212731022732236c252d34"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dc8e989a8e92b3a8b5bfb9af9cb9acbdf2bbb3aa">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Summary
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
<bullet> Crop production (NAICS code 111).
<bullet> Animal production (NAICS code 112).
<bullet> Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
<bullet> Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this
action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. What is EPA's authority for taking this action?
EPA is issuing this rulemaking under section 408 of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a. FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(A)(i) allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the legal limit
for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures
and all other exposures for which there is reliable information.'' This
includes exposure through drinking water and in residential settings
but does not include occupational exposure. FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C)
requires EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and
children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance
and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue . . .''
C. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's
tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Office of the
Federal Register's e-CFR site at <a href="https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40">https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40</a>.
D. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2024-0331 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
September 15, 2025. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2024-0331, by one of
the following methods:
<bullet>Federal eRulemaking Portal: <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
[[Page 31891]]
Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
<bullet>Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
<bullet>Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets">https://www.epa.gov/dockets</a>.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets">https://www.epa.gov/dockets</a>.
II. Petitioned-For Tolerance
In the Federal Register of January 13, 2025 (90 FR 2661) (FRL-
11682-11-OCSPP), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section
408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of pesticide
petition (PP4E9105) by UPL Chile S.A. (El Rosal 4610, Huechuraba
Santiago, Chile, Postal Code: 8590724). The petition requests that EPA
amend 40 CFR 180.417 by establishing a tolerance for residues of
triclopyr, [(3,5,6-trichloro-2- pyridinyl)oxy]acetic acid, including
its metabolites and degradates, in or on imported commodities in orange
subgroup 10-10A at 0.07 parts per million (ppm). That document
referenced a summary of the petition prepared by Exponent, Inc. on
behalf of UPL Chile S.A., the petitioner, which is available in docket
ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2024-0331 at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. There
were no comments received in response to the notice of filing.
Based upon review of the data supporting the petition and in
accordance with its authority under FFDCA section 408(d)(4)(A)(i), EPA
is establishing a tolerance at a different level than petitioned for.
The reason for this change is explained in Unit IV.C.
III. Final Tolerance Action
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors
specified therein, EPA has reviewed the available scientific data and
other relevant information in support of this action. EPA has
sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a determination on
aggregate exposure for triclopyr including exposure resulting from the
tolerances established by this action. EPA's assessment of exposures
and risks associated with triclopyr follows.
In an effort to streamline its publications in the Federal
Register, EPA is not reprinting sections that repeat what has been
previously published for tolerance rulemakings for the same pesticide
chemical. Where scientific information concerning a particular chemical
remains unchanged, the content of those sections would not vary between
tolerance rulemakings, and EPA considers referral back to those
sections as sufficient to provide an explanation of the information EPA
considered in making its safety determination for the new rulemaking.
EPA has previously published tolerance rulemakings for triclopyr in
which EPA concluded, based on the available information, that there is
a reasonable certainty that no harm would result from aggregate
exposure to triclopyr and established tolerances for residues of that
chemical. EPA is incorporating previously published sections from these
rulemakings as described further in this rulemaking, as they remain
unchanged.
A. Aggregate Risk and Determination of Safety. EPA determines
whether acute and chronic dietary pesticide exposures are safe by
comparing dietary exposure estimates to the acute population-adjusted
dose (aPAD) and chronic population-adjusted dose (cPAD). Short-,
intermediate-, and chronic-term risks are evaluated by comparing the
estimated total food, water, and residential exposure to the
appropriate PODs to ensure that an adequate margin of exposure (MOE)
exists.
Acute dietary risks are below the Agency's level of concern of 100%
of the aPAD; they are 88% of the aPAD for females 13-49 years old and
15% of the aPAD for all infants, the most highly exposed population
subgroup. No acute residential or recreational exposures are expected,
so the acute aggregate risk is equivalent to the acute dietary risk and
is not of concern. Chronic dietary risks are below the Agency's level
of concern of 100% of the cPAD; they are 63% of the cPAD for all
infants <1 year old, the most highly exposed population subgroup. No
long-term residential exposures are expected, so the chronic aggregate
risk is equivalent to the chronic dietary risk and is not of concern.
For the short-term aggregate risk assessment, potential residential
exposures were combined with food and drinking water exposures.
Specifically, the short-term aggregate assessment for adults combines
dietary (food + drinking water) exposures with handler inhalation
exposures resulting from the registered turf use and the MOE is 420.
For children 1 to <2 years old, the short-term aggregate assessment
combines dietary (food + drinking water) exposure with potential post-
application incidental oral exposure resulting from the registered turf
use and the MOE is 125. For children 3 to <6 years old, the short-term
aggregate assessment combines dietary (food + drinking water) exposure
with potential post-application inhalation and incidental oral swimmer
exposure resulting from the registered aquatic use and the MOE is 380.
As the short-term aggregate MOEs are greater than 100, the risks are
not of concern.
Although there are intermediate-term residential exposures,
intermediate-term aggregate risk was not separately assessed since (1)
the short- and intermediate-term points of departure are the same and
(2) the short-term aggregate risk assessment provides a worst-case
estimate of residential exposure. For these reasons, the short-term
aggregate risk assessment is protective of intermediate-term exposures.
As stated in Unit III.A. of the February 25, 2016, final rule, EPA
has determined that an aggregate exposure risk assessment for cancer
risk is not required based on weight-of-evidence conclusions on the
marginal evidence of carcinogenicity in two adequate rodent
carcinogenicity studies and the use of the chronic RfD which will
adequately account for any potential carcinogenic effects.
B. Toxicological Profile. For a discussion of the Toxicological
Profile of triclopyr, see Unit III.A. of the final rule published in
the Federal Register of February 25, 2016 (81 FR 9353) (FRL-9941-87).
C. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern. Once a
pesticide's toxicological profile is determined, EPA identifies
toxicological points of departure (POD) and levels of concern to use in
evaluating the risk posed by human exposure to the pesticide. For
hazards that have a threshold below which there is no appreciable risk,
the toxicological POD is used as the basis for derivation of reference
values for risk assessment. PODs are developed based on a careful
analysis of the doses in each toxicological study to determine the dose
at which no adverse effects are observed (the NOAEL) and the lowest
dose at which adverse effects of concern are identified (the LOAEL).
Uncertainty/safety factors are used in conjunction with the POD to
calculate a safe exposure level, generally referred to as a population-
adjusted dose (PAD) or a reference dose (RfD), and a safe margin of
exposure (MOE). For non-threshold risks, the Agency assumes that any
amount of exposure will lead to some degree of risk. Thus, the Agency
estimates risk in terms of the probability
[[Page 31892]]
of an occurrence of the adverse effect expected in a lifetime. For more
information on the general principles EPA uses in risk characterization
and a complete description of the risk assessment process, see <a href="https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/assessing-human-health-risk-pesticides">https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/assessing-human-health-risk-pesticides</a>.
A summary of the toxicological endpoints and points of departure
for triclopyr used for human risk assessment can be found in the
document, ``Triclopyr: Section 3 Human Health Risk Assessment for
Tolerances without U.S. Registration on Orange Subgroup 10-10A'' in
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2024-0331.
D. Exposure Assessment. For a summary of the assumptions used in
EPA's exposure assessments for triclopyr, see Unit III.C. of the
February 25, 2016, final rule and the updates described below.
EPA's dietary exposure assessments have been updated to include the
additional exposures from the petitioned-for tolerance. Acute and
chronic dietary (food and drinking water) exposure and risk assessments
were conducted using the Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model software
using the Food Commodity Intake Database (DEEM-FCID) Version 4.02. This
software uses 2005-2010 food consumption data from the USDA's National
Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, What We Eat in America
(NHANES/WWEIA). The acute dietary exposure assessment was unrefined,
using tolerance-level residues for all registered and proposed
commodities. The chronic dietary exposure assessment was slightly
refined, using tolerance-level residues for all commodities except
milk. An anticipated residue (AR) calculated from a livestock feeding
study was used for milk. Default processing factors were used to
estimate residues in processed commodities. Drinking water was
incorporated directly into the dietary assessment. The acute and
chronic dietary exposure assessments assumed 100% crop treated for all
registered and proposed commodities.
Section 408(b)(2)(E) of FFDCA authorizes EPA to use available data
and information on the anticipated levels of pesticide residues in food
and the actual levels of pesticide residues that have been measured in
food. If EPA relies on such information, EPA must require pursuant to
FFDCA section 408(f)(1) that data be provided 5 years after the
tolerance is established, modified, or left in effect, demonstrating
that the levels in food are not above the levels anticipated. For the
present action, EPA will issue such data call-ins as are required by
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(E) and authorized under FFDCA section
408(f)(1). Data will be required to be submitted no later than 5 years
from the date of issuance of this tolerance.
EPA revised the triclopyr drinking water assessment since the
February 25, 2016, final rule using current models, newly submitted
studies, and changes in labels. The estimated drinking water
concentrations (EDWCs) were higher for surface water sources than for
ground water sources. The acute dietary exposure assessment used the
highest 1-in-10-year acute EDWC of 758 parts per billion (ppb) of
triclopyr and the chronic dietary exposure assessment incorporated the
highest 1-in-10-year chronic EDWC of 396 ppb of triclopyr. As the
current action is for a tolerance without a corresponding U.S.
registration (i.e., an import tolerance), there will be no effect on
the EDWCs, and the previously provided EDWCs are still adequate for
use. The drinking water models and their descriptions are available at
the EPA internet site: <a href="https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/models-pesticide-risk-assessment">https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/models-pesticide-risk-assessment</a>.
The residential exposure assessment used the same assumptions as
described in the February 25, 2016, final rule. As this action is for
an import tolerance, it does not impact the domestic use pattern and
does not involve applications by homeowners or commercial applicators
in residential settings. Therefore, no new residential exposure is
expected.
Cumulative exposures. Unlike other pesticides for which EPA has
followed a cumulative risk approach based on a common mechanism of
toxicity, EPA has not made a common mechanism of toxicity finding as to
triclopyr and any other substances. 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol,
commonly known as TCP, is a metabolite of triclopyr, chlorpyrifos, and
chlorpyrifos-methyl. Risk assessment of TCP was conducted in 2002,
which concluded that the acute and chronic dietary aggregate exposure
estimates are below EPA's level of concern. As TCP is not a residue of
concern in plants and this action is for an import tolerance with no
impact on the domestic use pattern, this action will not result in any
additional exposure to TCP. The results of the 2002 TCP assessment are
still considered valid. For the purposes of this action, EPA has not
assumed that triclopyr has a common mechanism of toxicity with other
substances.
E. Safety Factor for Infants and Children. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of
FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply an additional tenfold (10X) margin
of safety for infants and children in the case of threshold effects to
account for prenatal and postnatal toxicity and the completeness of the
database on toxicity and exposure unless EPA determines based on
reliable data that a different margin of safety will be safe for
infants and children. This additional margin of safety is commonly
referred to as the Food Quality Protection Act Safety Factor (FQPA SF).
In applying this provision, EPA either retains the default value of
10X, or uses a different additional safety factor when reliable data
available to EPA support the choice of a different factor.
EPA continues to conclude that there is reliable data showing that
the safety of infants and children would be adequately protected if the
Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) safety factor were reduced from 10X
to 1X. The reasons for that decision are articulated in Unit III. of
the final rule published in the Federal Register of February 28, 2024
(89 FR 14591) (FRL-11763-01).
Therefore, based on the risk assessments and information described
above, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm
will result to the general population, or to infants and children, from
aggregate exposure to triclopyr residues. More detailed information on
this action can be found in the document titled ``Triclopyr: Section 3
Human Health Risk Assessment for Tolerances without U.S. Registration
on Orange Subgroup 10-10A'' in docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2024-0331.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
For information about the analytical enforcement methodology, see
Unit IV.A. of the February 25, 2016, final rule.
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA
section 408(b)(4). The Codex has not established any MRLs for
triclopyr.
C. Revisions to Petitioned-For Tolerance
EPA is establishing the tolerance for residues of triclopyr in or
on orange subgroup 10-10A at 0.1 ppm instead of the petitioned-for 0.07
ppm in order to
[[Page 31893]]
harmonize with the existing European Union (EU) MRLs for triclopyr in
oranges and mandarins. The petition requested that EPA establish the
tolerance at 0.07 ppm consistent with the European Food Safety
Authority (EFSA) Reasoned Opinion ``Modi[filig]cation of the existing
maximum residue levels for triclopyr in oranges, lemons and
mandarins,'' dated July 27, 2022. The EFSA Reasoned Opinion concluded
that the submitted data were sufficient to derive MRLs of 0.07 mg/kg
for oranges and mandarins, but it did not determine whether the
existing MRLs of 0.1 mg/kg for these commodities should be maintained
or lowered. The EU subsequently maintained the existing MRLs of 0.1 mg/
kg in Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/679, dated March 23, 2023. There
are no Codex, Canadian, or Mexican MRLs for triclopyr. Thus, to
harmonize with the EU MRLs, EPA is establishing the tolerance at 0.1
ppm, which is sufficient to cover the residues expected on the imported
commodities in orange subgroup 10-10A and which EPA has determined is
safe. A revised petition was submitted by UPL Chile S.A. to support
this change to the petitioned-for tolerance.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, a tolerance is established for residues of triclopyr,
[(3,5,6- trichloro-2-pyridinyl)oxy]acetic acid, including its
metabolites and degradates, in or on orange subgroup 10-10A at 0.1 ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review
This action is exempt from review under Executive Order 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993), because it establishes or modifies a
pesticide tolerance or a tolerance exemption under FFDCA section 408 in
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866.
B. Executive Order 14192: Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation
Executive Order 14192 (90 FR 9065, February 6, 2025) does not apply
because actions that establish a tolerance under FFDCA section 408 are
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., because it does not contain any
information collection activities.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
Since tolerance actions that are established on the basis of a
petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., do not apply to this
action.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain an unfunded mandate of $100 million or
more (in 1995 dollars and adjusted annually for inflation) as described
in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely
affect small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any
State, local, or Tribal governments or on the private sector.
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it will
not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship
between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have Tribal implications as specified in
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because it will
not have substantial direct effects on Tribal governments, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and the Indian Tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes.
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997) because tolerance actions like this one are exempt from
review under Executive Order 12866. However, EPA's 2021 Policy on
Children's Health applies to this action. This rule finalizes tolerance
actions under the FFDCA, which requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue . .
.'' (FFDCA 408(b)(2)(C)). The Agency's consideration is summarized in
Unit III.E.
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355)
(May 22, 2001) because it is not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
J. National Technology Transfer Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This action does not involve technical standards that would require
Agency consideration under NTTAA section 12(d), 15 U.S.C. 272.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., and EPA
will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a ``major
rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: July 14, 2025.
Charles Smith,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 180--TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES
IN FOOD
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.417, amend the table in paragraph (a)(1) by adding in
alphabetical order the entry ``Orange subgroup 10-10A \1\'' and adding
footnote 1 to read as follows:
Sec. 180.417 Triclopyr; tolerance for residues.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
[[Page 31894]]
Table 1 to Paragraph (a)(1)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Orange subgroup 10-10A \1\.................................. 0.1
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no U.S. registrations for these commodities as of July 16,
2025.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2025-13317 Filed 7-15-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on July 16, 2025.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.