Notice2025-13252

Dixie National Forest; Utah; Brian Head Resort Expansion Environmental Impact Statement

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
July 15, 2025

Issuing agencies

Agriculture DepartmentForest Service

Abstract

The USDA Forest Service is preparing an environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Brian Head Resort Expansion. Brian Head Resort Recreation 1, LLC (BHR) has submitted a proposal to the Dixie National Forest (DNF) to pursue approval of projects identified within BHR's 2023 Master Development Plan (MDP). The DNF is considering this proposal and is initiating the preparation of an EIS to analyze and disclose the potential environmental effects of the proposed projects (proposed action). The Planning Administrative Reviews & Litigation System number is 65965.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 133 (Tuesday, July 15, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 133 (Tuesday, July 15, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31598-31599]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-13252]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 15, 2025 / 
Notices

[[Page 31598]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Dixie National Forest; Utah; Brian Head Resort Expansion 
Environmental Impact Statement

AGENCY: Forest Service, Agriculture (USDA).

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service is preparing an environmental impact 
statement (EIS) for the Brian Head Resort Expansion. Brian Head Resort 
Recreation 1, LLC (BHR) has submitted a proposal to the Dixie National 
Forest (DNF) to pursue approval of projects identified within BHR's 
2023 Master Development Plan (MDP). The DNF is considering this 
proposal and is initiating the preparation of an EIS to analyze and 
disclose the potential environmental effects of the proposed projects 
(proposed action). The Planning Administrative Reviews & Litigation 
System number is 65965.

DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received 
by August 29, 2025. This environmental analysis will follow the USDA 
regulations implementing NEPA (as described in the interim final rule 
effective July 3, 2025) and the timing of the subsequent steps of this 
EIS process shall be available at <a href="https://www.fs.usda.gov/r04/dixie/projects/65965">https://www.fs.usda.gov/r04/dixie/projects/65965</a>, with the final EIS expected to be released two years 
from publication of the NOI.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be submitted through the public 
participation portal on the project web page: <a href="https://www.fs.usda.gov/r04/dixie/projects/65965">https://www.fs.usda.gov/r04/dixie/projects/65965</a>. To submit comments using the web form on the 
project web page select ``Get Connected'' under ``Project Summary'' on 
the project's web page. Then select ``Comment/Object on Project'' to be 
directed to the comment web form. Written comments can also be sent to: 
Kevin Wright, Forest Supervisor, c/o Matt Loscalzo, Project Manager, 
Dixie National Forest; 820 N Main Street, Cedar City, UT 84721 820 N 
Main Street, Cedar City, UT 84721, or via facsimile to (435) 865-3791. 
Please use the subject line ``Brian Head Resort Expansion Environmental 
Impact Statement.'' A full description of the project purpose and need 
and proposed action can be found on the project web page at: <a href="https://www.fs.usda.gov/r04/dixie/projects/65965">https://www.fs.usda.gov/r04/dixie/projects/65965</a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Loscalzo, Project Manager, by 
email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5a373b2e2e323f2d74363529393b3620351a2f293e3b743d352c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="375a5643435f5240195b584454565b4d58774244535619505841">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>, (720) 908-1213. Individuals who use 
telecommunications devices for the hearing impaired may call 711 to 
reach the Telecommunications Relay Service, 24 hours a day, every day 
of the year, including holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Purpose and Need for Action

    The purpose of, and need for, Forest Service action is to respond 
to an application submitted by BHR under the National Forest Ski Area 
Permit Act of 1986 and Ski Area Recreational Opportunity Act of 2011 to 
implement projects from their accepted MDP. The 1986 Land and Resource 
Management Plan for the Dixie National Forest (DNF LRMP) identifies 
providing increased downhill skiing capacity and working with the 
private sector to help meet future recreation demand as desired future 
conditions for recreation on the DNF. The Forest Service has identified 
a need to meet the demand for increased downhill skiing capacity 
working through this private sector application from BHR. The Forest 
Service will use the EIS to inform the decision regarding: whether to 
approve, in whole or in part, BHR's application; the selection of a 
preferred alternative; determining appropriate environmental protection 
measures; and establishing, if necessary, what terms and conditions 
should apply with the issuance of an amended special use permit (SUP).
    BHR has identified a need to add a variety of recreational 
opportunities and amenities to address shortcomings in resort capacity, 
access, and operations to meet the demands of a growing, recreational-
focused region and state. BHR's overall purpose of the proposed action 
is to provide an improved and unique guest experience that meets the 
current and expected population growth, and associated demand for 
outdoor recreation in Utah and the southwest region, which cannot be 
accomplished within BHR's existing operational and SUP boundary. A full 
description of BHR's Purpose and Need can be found at: <a href="https://www.fs.usda.gov/r04/dixie/projects/65965">https://www.fs.usda.gov/r04/dixie/projects/65965</a>.

Proposed Action

    The proposed action includes: the expansion of the existing special 
use permit (SUP) area; installation of new lifts; construction (tree 
and stump removal and grading) of new ski trails; construction of new 
on-mountain facilities; installation of new snowmaking facilities; 
installation of new utilities; construction of new administrative roads 
and improvements to existing roadbeds to access new infrastructure 
(such as upper lift terminals); re-routing of an existing snowmobile 
route; and hazard tree removal and post-fire treatment in areas 
impacted by the 2017 Brian Head Fire.
    A full description of the proposed action on National Forest System 
lands and adjacent private land can be found at: <a href="https://www.fs.usda.gov/r04/dixie/projects/65965">https://www.fs.usda.gov/r04/dixie/projects/65965</a>.
    If necessary, the need for potential amendment(s) of the DNF LRMP, 
as amended, in the areas of the proposed SUP boundary adjustment will 
be identified and disclosed in the EIS. The purpose and need of the 
potential plan amendment(s) would be to ensure consistency of the 
project with the DNF LRMP 's scenery and recreation management 
settings. The scope of the potential amendment may be project-specific 
or plan-level.

Expected Impacts

    The proposed action has the potential to result in impacts to 
various resources including water, cultural resources, scenery, 
recreation, traffic/transportation, wildlife, and socioeconomics. 
Specific issues to be analyzed include: potential impacts to hydrologic 
and/or groundwater resources from additional water use for expanded 
snowmaking operations; potential impacts to dark night skies, 
specifically to the Cedar Breaks National Monument (CBNM), a designated 
International Dark Sky Park; the potential for new ski area 
infrastructure to adversely affect cultural resources

[[Page 31599]]

and the scenic resource on DNF-managed lands (which will be analyzed 
for consistency with the Scenic Integrity Objectives [SIOs] in the DNF 
LRMP); the potential to alter the quality and variety of recreation 
opportunities available within and proximate to the proposed SUP 
expansion areas (which will be analyzed for consistency with the DNF 
LRMP's Recreation Opportunity Spectrum [ROS] designation of Semi-
Primitive Non-Motorized, Semi-Primitive Motorized, and Roaded Natural) 
as well as potential to impact permitted snowmobile operations for a 
neighboring small business; the potential to increase traffic on 
Highway 143 resulting from an increase to BHR's comfortable carrying 
capacity; the potential to negatively impact northern goshawk nesting 
and Post Fledgling Area habitat, crucial summer calving habitat for 
Rocky Mountain elk, crucial summer fawning habitat for mule deer, 
habitat for American pika, and habitat for the Brian Head Mountain 
snail within and adjacent to the project area; and the potential to 
affect adjacent communities resulting from changes in employment, 
tourism revenue, and housing in Iron County.

Lead and Cooperating Agencies

    The Forest Service is the lead federal agency for NEPA compliance, 
review, and approval concerning the EIS. The National Park Service/CBNM 
will be a cooperating agency to assist in the NEPA analysis for dark 
skies and water resources.

Responsible Official

    The responsible official is Kevin Wright, Forest Supervisor, Dixie 
National Forest.

Scoping Comments and the Objection Process

    This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides 
the development of the EIS. In this process the Agency is requesting 
comments on potential alternatives and impacts, and identification of 
any relevant information, studies or analyses of any kind concerning 
impacts affecting the quality of the human or natural environment. 
Further, three public open house meetings will be held during this 
comment period. These open houses will be held in the Town of Brian 
Head, the City of Parowan, and Cedar City. Details of the dates, times, 
and locations of these meetings can be found on the project's web page: 
<a href="https://www.fs.usda.gov/r04/dixie/projects/65965">https://www.fs.usda.gov/r04/dixie/projects/65965</a>. Representatives from 
the DNF and BHR will be present at these scoping open houses to answer 
questions and provide additional information on this project.
    It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times 
and in such a manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation 
of the final EIS; therefore, comments must be provided prior to the 
close of the comment period and should clearly articulate the 
reviewer's concerns and contentions. Commenting during scoping and any 
other designated opportunity to comment provided by the Responsible 
Official as prescribed by the applicable regulations will also govern 
eligibility to object once the final EIS and draft Record of Decision 
has been published. Comments received in response to this solicitation, 
including names and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the 
public record for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously 
will be accepted and considered; however, they will not be used to 
establish eligibility for the objection process.
    Objections will be accepted only from those who have previously 
submitted specific written comments regarding the proposed project and 
any project-specific amendment(s) during scoping or other designated 
opportunity for public comment in accordance with 36 CFR 218.5(a). 
Issues raised in objections must be based on previously submitted 
timely, specific written comments regarding the proposed project unless 
based on new information arising after designated comment 
opportunities.
    If the potential amendment(s) is plan-level in scope then the 
amendment decision would be subject to the plan objection process of 36 
CFR 219, Subpart B. Only those individuals and entities who submit 
substantive formal comments related to the potential plan amendment(s) 
during the opportunities for public comment as provided in 36 CFR 219, 
Subpart A may file a plan amendment(s) objection. The burden is on the 
objector to demonstrate compliance with requirements for objection (36 
CFR 219.53).

Permits, Licenses or Other Authorizations Required

    <bullet> Forest Service SUP.
    <bullet> Other permits as identified through scoping and the EIS 
analysis process.

Nature of Decision To Be Made

    Given the purpose and need, the responsible official will review 
the proposed action, the alternatives, and the environmental 
consequences to decide the following:
    <bullet> Whether to approve, approve with modifications, or deny 
BHR's application to amend their SUP for the adjustment of BHR's SUP 
area, the associated projects within the proposed SUP areas, and the 
projects within BHR's existing SUP boundary;
    <bullet> The selection of a preferred alternative; and
    <bullet> Whether to prescribe conditions needed for the protection 
of the environment on NFS lands.
    <bullet> Whether or not to approve any forest plan amendments 
necessary as identified in the EIS to bring the project in compliance 
with the DNF LRMP. These decisions would be made in the record of 
decision, which would be issued following the publication of a final 
EIS and completion of the Forest Service objection process (36 CFR part 
218, subparts A and B, and 36 CFR 219, Subpart B if necessary).

Substantive Requirements

    When proposing a potential forest plan amendment, regulation36 CFR 
219.13(b)(2) requires the Responsible Official to identify which 
specific substantive requirements (36 CFR 219.8 through 219.11) are 
likely to be directly affected and therefore applicable to the 
potential amendments. The substantive requirements that are likely 
directly related to the purpose or effects of amendments to the forest 
plan scenery and recreation management settings are 36 CFR 219.8(b), 36 
CFR 219.10(a), and 36 CFR 219.10(b).

Beattra Wilson,
Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest System.
[FR Doc. 2025-13252 Filed 7-14-25; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3411-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on July 15, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.