Rule2025-13134

Revisions to the Office of Hearings and Appeals Procedural Regulations for the DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
July 14, 2025
Effective
August 13, 2025

Issuing agencies

Energy Department

Abstract

The Department of Energy ("DOE") is publishing this document to respond to comments received on the direct final rule to rescind an unnecessary regulation encouraging alternative dispute resolution to resolve complaints under the DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program that published on May 16, 2025. As a result, DOE delays the effective date of the direct final rule, and is responding to the comment it received on the direct final rule.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 132 (Monday, July 14, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 132 (Monday, July 14, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31136-31137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-13134]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

10 CFR Part 708

[DOE-HQ-2025-0012]
RIN 1910-AA56


Revisions to the Office of Hearings and Appeals Procedural 
Regulations for the DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program

AGENCY: Office of Hearings and Appeals, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Direct final rule; delay of effective date; response to 
comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (``DOE'') is publishing this document 
to respond to comments received on the direct final rule to rescind an 
unnecessary regulation encouraging alternative dispute resolution to 
resolve complaints under the DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program 
that published on May 16, 2025. As a result, DOE delays the effective 
date of the direct final rule, and is responding to the comment it 
received on the direct final rule.

DATES: As of July 14, 2025, the effective date of the direct final rule 
published May 16, 2025, at 90 FR 20766, is delayed until August 13, 
2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jeffrey Novak, U.S. Department of 
Energy, Office of the General Counsel, GC-1, 1000 Independence Avenue 
SW, Washington, DC 20585-0121; (202) 586-5281 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#14505b5153717a71667578577b617a677178547c653a707b713a737b62"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="064249434163686374676a4569736875636a466e772862696328616970">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. May 2025 Direct Final Rule

    On May 16, 2025, DOE published a direct final rule rescinding Sec.  
708.10 of title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (``CFR''). 90 FR 20766 
(``May 2025 DFR'') Section 708.10 contains a statement that encourages 
the use of alternative dispute resolution (``ADR'') for resolving 
complaints under the DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program. The 
regulation does not confer any substantive right or obligation on DOE 
or any party and is not required by statute.

II. Response to Comments

    DOE received three comments in response to the May 2025 DFR.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ This rule also corrects an error in the May 2025 DFR that 
identified the docket as DOE-HQ-2025-00120012. To address that 
error, this document correctly identifies the docket as DOE-HQ-2025-
0012.

                              Table II.1--List of Commenters From the May 2025 DFR
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                      Comment No. in
               Commenter                   Reference in this rule       the docket          Commenter type
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous..............................  Anonymous.................                2  Individual.
Professor Bridget C.E. Dooling.........  Dooling...................                3  Individual.
Anonymous..............................  Anonymous.................                4  Individual.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Response to Administrative Procedure Act Procedural Comment

    Dooling stated that the May 2025 DFR did not satisfy the good cause 
exemption from notice and comment rulemaking under the Administrative 
Procedure Act (``APA''). (Dooling, No. 3 at p. 4).
    In response, DOE notes that the APA requires that agencies provide 
all interested persons with fair notice and an opportunity to comment 
on the rulemaking. See 5 U.S.C. 553(b) & (c). The May 2025 DFR provided 
the public with fair notice of DOE's changes to its own administrative 
procedures regarding ADR in the DOE Contractor Employee Protection 
Program. See 90 FR 20766, 20767 (discussing specific administrative 
changes encouraging ADR). DOE also requested comments on the May 2025 
DFR, and stated, if the

[[Page 31137]]

Department received significant adverse comments, the Department would 
withdraw the rule or issue a new final rule which responds to such 
comments. Id. at 90 FR 20766. Thus, DOE provided interested persons 
with fair notice and an opportunity to comment as required by the APA. 
As a result, there was no need for a good cause exemption from notice-
and-comment rulemaking under 5 U.S.C. 553(b).
    Finally, contrary to the comment from Dooling (Dooling, No. 3 at p. 
5), Dooling cannot argue commenters were denied fair notice and an 
opportunity to comment solely based on how the notice was labeled. See 
Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter & Paul Home v. Pennsylvania, 
591 U.S. 657, 683 (2020) (holding that ``[f]ormal labels aside, the 
[interim final rules] contained all of the elements of a notice of 
proposed rulemaking as required by the APA''). Irrespective of its 
title, the May 2025 DFR contained the required elements of a proposed 
rulemaking under the APA.

B. Response to Other Comments

    DOE received two comments, which stated (1) that parties benefit 
from ADR and the rescission of this regulation would make complainants 
less aware of this cost-saving service; and (2) that this regulation 
was required by the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act (``ADRA''), 5 
U.S.C. 573. (Anonymous, No. 2 at p. 1; Anonymous, No. 4 at p. 1) In 
response to the first point, DOE notes that it will continue to advise 
all parties to disputes under the DOE Contractor Employee Protection 
Program as to the availability of ADR services in order to promote 
cost-efficient methods of problem solving pursuant to 10 CFR 708.18 and 
10 CFR 708.27. In light of DOE's direct outreach to parties who might 
benefit from ADR, there is no evidence that parties rely on this 
regulation to learn of the availability of ADR, and, therefore, there 
is no evidence that the rescission of this regulation will reduce the 
use of ADR in any meaningful way. And in response to the second point, 
ADRA does not require the DOE to maintain specific regulations 
encouraging the use of ADR; rather it requires generally that agencies 
``encourage and facilitate agency use of alternative means of dispute 
resolution.'' (5 U.S.C. 573(c)(1)) DOE will continue to encourage and 
facilitate the use of ADR when appropriate regardless of any specific 
regulation, and, thus, will adhere to the requirements of ADRA.

III. Conclusion

    For the reasons discussed in the preceding sections of this 
document, DOE is not withdrawing the May 2025 DFR, which rescinds the 
regulation encouraging the use of ADR for resolving complaints under 
the DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program.
    DOE also notes, to the extent that 5 U.S.C. 553 applies to the 
delay of effective date, it is exempt from notice and comment because 
it constitutes a rule of procedure under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A) and for 
which no notice or hearing is required by statute. Additionally, this 
action is not a ``substantive rule'' for which a 30-day delay in 
effective date is required under 5 U.S.C. 553(d).

Signing Authority

    This document of the Department of Energy was signed on July 9, 
2025, by Chris Wright, Secretary of Energy. That document with the 
original signature and date is maintained by DOE. For administrative 
purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of the Office of the 
Federal Register, the undersigned DOE Federal Register Liaison Officer 
has been authorized to sign and submit the document in electronic 
format for publication, as an official document of the Department of 
Energy. This administrative process in no way alters the legal effect 
of this document upon publication in the Federal Register.

    Signed in Washington, DC, on July 10, 2025.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2025-13134 Filed 7-11-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on July 14, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.