Notice2025-12947

Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires From India: Preliminary Results and Partial Recission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
July 11, 2025

Issuing agencies

Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that certain producers/exporters subject to this review made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), March 1, 2023, through February 29, 2024. We are also rescinding this administrative review, in part, with respect to 14 companies because these companies had no reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results of review.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 131 (Friday, July 11, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 131 (Friday, July 11, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30871-30874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-12947]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-869]


Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires From India: Preliminary 
Results and Partial Recission of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2023-2024

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 
determines that certain producers/exporters subject to this review made 
sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV) during the 
period of review (POR), March 1, 2023, through February 29, 2024. We 
are also rescinding this administrative review, in part, with respect 
to 14 companies because these companies had no reviewable entries of 
subject merchandise during the POR. We invite interested parties to 
comment on these preliminary results of review.

DATES: Applicable July 11, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria Papakostas or Seth Brown, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office IX, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade

[[Page 30872]]

Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0086 or (202) 482-0029, 
respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On March 6, 2017, Commerce published in the Federal Register the 
antidumping duty (AD) order on certain new pneumatic off-the-road tires 
(OTR tires) from India.\1\ On May 8, 2024, based on timely requests for 
review, Commerce initiated an administrative review of the Order 
covering 26 companies.\2\ On November 18, 2024, Commerce extended the 
time limit for these preliminary results to April 7, 2025.\3\ On 
December 9, 2024, Commerce tolled certain deadlines in this 
administrative proceeding by 90 days.\4\ Accordingly, the deadline for 
the final results is now July 7, 2025. For a complete description of 
the events that followed the initiation of this review, see the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from India: 
Antidumping Duly Order, 82 FR 12553 (March 6, 2017) (Order); see 
also Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from India: Notice of 
Correction to Antidumping Duty Order, 82 FR 25598 (June 2, 2017).
    \2\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 89 FR 38867 (May 8, 2024).
    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary 
Results of 2023-2024 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated 
November 18, 2024.
    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings,'' dated December 9, 2024.
    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary 
Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order 
on Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from India; 2023-2024,'' 
dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice 
(Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the scope of the Order is OTR tires from 
India. For a full description of the scope of the Order, see the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.

Partial Recission of Administrative Review

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), it is Commerce's practice to 
rescind an administrative review of an AD order where it concludes that 
there were no suspended entries of subject merchandise during the 
POR.\6\ Normally, upon completion of an administrative review, the 
suspended entries are liquidated at the AD assessment rate for the 
review period.\7\ Therefore, for an administrative review to be 
conducted, there must be a reviewable, suspended entry that Commerce 
can instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate at 
the calculated AD assessment rate for the review period.\8\ On August 
13, 2024, we notified parties of our intent to rescind this review 
regarding the companies listed in Appendix III because there were no 
reviewable, suspended entries of subject merchandise from these 
companies during the POR and invited interested parties to comment.\9\ 
No parties commented on our intent to rescind the review, in part. In 
the absence of any suspended entries of subject merchandise from these 
companies during the POR, we are rescinding this administrative review 
for the companies listed in Appendix III, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.213(d)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See, e.g., Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to Length 
Plate from the Federal Republic of Germany: Recission of Antidumping 
Administrative Review; 2020-2021, 88 FR 4154 (January 24, 2023).
    \7\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
    \8\ See, e.g., Shanghai Sunbeauty Trading Co. v. United States, 
380 F. Supp. 3d 1328, 1337 (CIT 2019), at 12 (referring to section 
751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the U.S. 
Court of International Trade held: ``While the statute does not 
explicitly require that an entry be suspended as a prerequisite for 
establishing entitlement to a review, it does explicitly state the 
determined rate will be used as the liquidation rate for the 
reviewed entries. This result can only obtain if the liquidation of 
entries has been suspended''; see also Certain Frozen Fish Fillets 
from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 
2018-2019, 86 FR 36102 (July 8, 2021), and accompanying Issues and 
Decision Memorandum at Comment 4; and Solid Fertilizer Grade 
Ammonium Nitrate from the Russian Federation: Notice of Rescission 
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 77 FR 65532 (October 29, 
2012) (noting that ``for an administrative review to be conducted, 
there must be a reviewable, suspended entry to be liquidated at the 
newly calculated assessment rate'').
    \9\ See Memorandum, ``Notice of Intent to Rescind Review, In 
Part,'' dated August 13, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 
751(a) of the Act. We calculated export price and constructed export 
price in accordance with section 772 of the Act. We calculated NV in 
accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the 
methodology underlying these preliminary results, see the Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum. A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum is attached as Appendix I. The Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum is a public document and is available to the public via 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, a complete 
version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly 
at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.

Review-Specific Rate for Non-Examined Companies

    The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address the rate to 
be applied to companies not selected for individual examination when 
Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to 
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 
735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the 
all-others rate in a market economy less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 
investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for companies 
which were not selected for individual examination in an administrative 
review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is 
normally ``an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated 
weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and 
producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis 
margins, and any margins determined entirely {on the basis of facts 
available{time} .''
    We preliminarily calculated a de minimis dumping margin for one of 
the two mandatory respondents, Asian Tire Factory Ltd. and Lyallpur 
Rubber Mills (collectively, ATF). Therefore, we have preliminarily 
assigned a dumping margin to the companies not selected for individual 
examination in this review \10\ based on the rate calculated for the 
other mandatory respondent, ATC Tires Private Limited and ATC Tires AP 
Private Ltd. (collectively, ATC).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Appendix II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Results of the Review

    As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine the 
following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period March 
1, 2023, through February 29, 2024:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                    Producer or exporter                        dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATC Tires Private Limited; ATC Tires AP Private Limited.....        3.78
Asian Tire Factory Ltd.; Lyallpur Rubber Mills..............        0.00
Companies Not Selected for Individual Review \11\...........        3.78
------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 30873]]

Disclosure
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The exporters or producers not selected for individual 
review are listed in Appendix II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We intend to disclose to interested parties the calculations 
performed for these preliminary results within five days of any public 
announcement or, if there is no public announcement, within five days 
of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Public Comment

    Case briefs or other written comments may be submitted to the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Pursuant to 19 CFR 
351.309(c)(1)(ii), we have modified the deadline for interested parties 
to submit case briefs to Commerce to no later than 21 days after the 
date of the publication of this notice.\12\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to 
issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days 
after the date for filing case briefs.\13\ Interested parties who 
submit case or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding must submit with each 
argument: (1) a table of contents listing each issue; and (2) a table 
of authorities.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See 19 CFR 351.309.
    \13\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1); see also Administrative 
Protective Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 
2023) (APO and Service Final Rule).
    \14\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As provided under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior 
proceedings, we have encouraged interested parties to provide an 
executive summary of their briefs that should be limited to five pages 
total, including footnotes. In this review, we instead request that 
interested parties provide, at the beginning of their briefs, a public 
executive summary for each issue raised in their briefs.\15\ Further, 
we request that interested parties limit their public executive summary 
of each issue to no more than 450 words, not including citations. We 
intend to use the public executive summaries as the basis of the 
comment summaries included in the issues and decision memorandum that 
will accompany the final results in this administrative review. We 
request that interested parties include footnotes for relevant 
citations in the public executive summary of each issue.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ We use the term ``issue'' here to describe an argument that 
Commerce would normally address in a comment of the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant 
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via 
ACCESS within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. 
Requests should contain: (1) the party's name, address, and telephone 
number; (2) the number of participants, and whether any participant is 
a foreign national; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues 
raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective 
case briefs. Oral presentations at the hearing will be limited to 
issues raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, 
parties will be notified of the time and date for the hearing.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    All submissions, including case and rebuttal briefs, as well as 
hearing requests, should be filed via ACCESS.\17\ An electronically 
filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by ACCESS 
by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the established deadline. Note that 
Commerce has amended certain of its requirements pertaining to the 
service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See 19 CFR 351.303.
    \18\ See APO and Service Final Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    Upon completion of this administrative review, pursuant to section 
751(a)(2)(A) of the Act, Commerce shall determine, and CBP shall 
assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this 
review. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), where the respondent reported 
the entered value of its U.S. sales, we will calculate importer-
specific ad valorem assessment rates based on the ratio of the total 
amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales to the total 
entered value of the sales for which entered value was reported. Where 
the respondent did not report entered value, we will calculate 
importer-specific per-unit duty assessment rates based on the ratio of 
the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the examined 
sales to the total quantity of those sales. To determine whether an 
importer-specific per-unit assessment rate is de minimis in accordance 
with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will also calculate an importer-specific 
ad valorem ratio based on estimated entered values. Where either a 
respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis 
within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importer specific 
assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to 
liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping 
duties.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See 19 CFR 351.212(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' practice will apply to entries 
of subject merchandise during the POR produced by ATC or ATF for which 
the reviewed companies did not know that the merchandise they sold to 
the intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading company, or exporter) was 
destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP 
to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no 
rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the companies listed in Appendix II which were not selected for 
individual review, we will assign an assessment rate based on the 
review-specific rate, calculated as noted in the ``Rate for Non-
Examined Companies'' section, above.
    For the companies listed in Appendix III for which we are 
rescinding this review, we will instruct CBP to assess antidumping 
duties on all appropriate entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit 
of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or 
withdrawal from warehouse, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(l)(i). 
Commerce intends to issue these rescission instructions to CBP no 
earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of this notice in 
the Federal Register.
    Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP regarding 
ATC, ATF, and the companies listed in Appendix II no earlier than 35 
days after the date of publication of the final results of this review 
in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court 
of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not 
to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a 
request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of 
publication).
    The final results of this review shall be the basis for the 
assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by 
this review and for future deposits of estimated duties, where 
applicable.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by

[[Page 30874]]

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for the 
companies listed above will be that established in the final results of 
this review, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent and 
therefore, de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in 
which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously 
investigated or reviewed companies not covered by this review, the cash 
deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published 
for the most recently-completed segment of this proceeding in which the 
company participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this 
review, a prior review, or the LTFV investigation, but the producer is, 
then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most 
recently-completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the 
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or 
exporters will continue to be 3.67 percent, the all-others rate 
established in the LTFV investigation.\22\ These deposit requirements, 
when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Review

    Unless otherwise extended, Commerce intends to issue the final 
results of this administrative review, including the results of its 
analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, no later than 120 
days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal 
Register, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.213(h)(1).

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to 
liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing and the subsequent 
assessment of doubled antidumping duties, and/or an increase in the 
amount of antidumping by the amount of countervailing duties.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results in 
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.221(b)(4).

     Dated: July 7, 2025.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Methodology
V. Recommendation

Appendix II

Companies Not Selected for Individual Review

1. Apollo Tyres Ltd.
2. CEAT Ltd.
3. JK Tyres and Industries Ltd.
4. K.R.M. Tyres
5. Mahansaria Tyres Private Limited
6. MRF Limited
7. MRL Tyres Limited
8. Speedways Rubber Company
9. Sun Tyres & Wheel Systems
10. TVS Srichakra Limited

Appendix III

Companies With No Reviewable Entries

1. Aakriti Manufacturing Pvt. Ltd.
2. Balkrishna Industries Ltd.
3. Carrier Wheels Private Limited
4. Cavendish Industries Ltd.
5. Celite Tyre Corporation
6. Emerald Resilient Tyre Manufacturer
7. HRI Tires India
8. John Deere India Pvt. Ltd.
9. OTR Laminated Tyres (I) Pvt. Ltd.
10. Ralson Tyres Limited
11. Royal Tyres Private Limited
12. Sundaram Industries Private Limited
13. Tyre Experts LLP
14. Ultra Mile

[FR Doc. 2025-12947 Filed 7-10-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on July 11, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.