Proposed Rule2025-12867

Air Plan Approval; California; Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District; Definition of Terms

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
July 10, 2025

Issuing agencies

Environmental Protection Agency

Abstract

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve revisions to the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD or "the District") portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern definitions that are necessary to implement and enforce local rules that regulate air pollution. We are proposing to approve a definitions rule under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the "Act"). We are also proposing to approve the rescission of earlier versions of this rule from the California SIP as they are no longer needed to under the CAA. We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to follow with a final action.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 130 (Thursday, July 10, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 130 (Thursday, July 10, 2025)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30611-30613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-12867]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2022-0858; FRL-10563-01-R9]


Air Plan Approval; California; Mojave Desert Air Quality 
Management District; Definition of Terms

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve revisions to the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District 
(MDAQMD or ``the District'') portion of the California State 
Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern definitions that are 
necessary to implement and enforce local rules that regulate air 
pollution. We are proposing to approve a definitions rule under the 
Clean Air Act (CAA or the ``Act''). We are also proposing to approve 
the rescission of earlier versions of this rule from the California SIP 
as they are no longer needed to under the CAA. We are taking comments 
on this proposal and plan to follow with a final action.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 11, 2025.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
OAR-2022-0858 at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. For comments submitted at 
<a href="http://regulations.gov">regulations.gov</a>, follow the online instructions for submitting 
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from 
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public 
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, 
video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written 
comment is considered the official comment and should include 
discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not 
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary 
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For 
additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public 
comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and 
general guidance on making effective comments, please visit <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets">https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets</a>. If you need assistance in a 
language other than English or if you are a person with disabilities 
who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please contact 
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, 75 
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105, telephone number: (415) 972-
3024, email address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#79151803180b0c0a57180b1716151d391c0918571e160f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="78141902190a0d0b56190a1617141c381d0819561f170e">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,'' 
and ``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. The State's Submittal
    A. What rule did the State submit?
    B. Are there other versions of this rule?
    C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revision and 
rescissions?
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
    A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule and rescissions?
    B. Do the rule and rescissions meet the evaluation criteria?
    C. Public comment and proposed action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. The State's Submittal

A. What rule did the State submit?

    Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this proposal with the dates 
that it was adopted by the local air agency and submitted by the 
California Air Resources Board (CARB) to the EPA. Table 2 lists the 
existing SIP-approved rules that the EPA is proposing to rescind with 
this action because they have been superseded.

                                             Table 1--Submitted Rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Local agency                   Rule #             Rule title             Amended        Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MDAQMD................................             102  Definition of Terms.....       9/28/2020       3/12/2021
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                          Table 2--Rules for Which Rescission From the SIP is Requested
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          Submitted     Federal  Register
         Rule to rescind                  Adopted         to the EPA        citation            Superseded by
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
San Bernardino County Air          7/5/1977............    11/4/1977  43 FR 59489;          SBCAPCD Rule 102 at
 Pollution Control District                                            December 21, 1978.    40 CFR
 (SBCAPCD) Rule 102--Definitions.                                                            52.220(c)(179)(i)(B
                                                                                             )(1).
Riverside County Air Pollution     Not available.......    11/4/1977  43 FR 59489,          South Coast AQMD
 Control District (RCAPCD) Rule                                        December 21, 1978.    Rule 102 at 40 CFR
 102--Definitions.                                                                           52.220(c)(44)(v)(A)
                                                                                             .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 30612]]

    On September 12, 2021, the submittal for MDAQMD Rule 102 was deemed 
by operation of law to be complete. The submittal meets the 
completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51, appendix V.

B. Are there other versions of this rule?

    We approved the prior version of MDAQMD Rule 102 into the SIP on 
November 12, 2020 (85 FR 71846). The prior version of MDAQMD Rule 102 
was amended on January 28, 2019, and CARB submitted it to us on August 
19, 2019. If approved, the current version of MDAQMD Rule 102 would 
replace the prior SIP-approved version of the rule. In addition, there 
are other outdated versions of Rule 102 (as listed in table 2) that 
apply within the MDAQMD that we are proposing to remove from the MDAQMD 
portion of the SIP because they have been superseded.

C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revision and rescissions?

    Section 110(a) of the CAA requires states to submit regulations 
that control emissions of various air pollutants such as volatile 
organic compounds, oxides of nitrogen, and particulate matter. MDAQMD 
Rule 102 contains definitions that are necessary to implement and 
enforce rules that regulate air pollution within the MDAQMD. MDAQMD 
made numerous clarifying revisions to Rule 102 that will improve 
implementation of its air program. The purpose of the requested rule 
rescissions is to eliminate any legal confusion regarding the 
applicability of rules in the MDAQMD that have been superseded but that 
remain in the SIP. Our technical support document (TSD) evaluates the 
revisions to Rule 102 and the requested rescissions.

II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action

A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule and rescissions?

    Rules in the SIP must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)), 
must not interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment 
and reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA 
section 110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements 
in nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emissions 
reductions (see CAA section 193).
    Guidance and policy documents that we used to evaluate 
enforceability, relaxation, and rule stringency requirements for the 
applicable criteria pollutants include the following:
    1. ``State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the 
Implementation of Title I of the CAA Amendments of 1990,'' 57 FR 13498 
(April 16, 1992); 57 FR 18070 (April 28, 1992).
    2. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and 
Deviations,'' EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook, revised January 11, 
1990).
    3. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule 
Deficiencies,'' EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (``the Little 
Bluebook'').

B. Do the rule and rescissions meet the evaluation criteria?

    Based on our review, MDAQMD Rule 102 and the rescission of SBCAPCD 
Rule 102 and RCAPCD Rule 102 meet applicable CAA requirements and are 
consistent with relevant guidance regarding enforceability and SIP 
revisions. The TSD has more information on our evaluation.

C. Public comment and proposed action

    As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA proposes to 
approve the submitted rule in table 1 because it fulfills all relevant 
requirements. If approved, the rule in table 1 would replace the 
current version of the rule in the SIP. Additionally, as authorized in 
section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA proposes to approve the 
rescission of the rules in table 2 from the MDAQMD portion of the 
California SIP because they are no longer needed to meet any CAA 
requirement and because rescission would not interfere with reasonable 
further progress or attainment of any of the NAAQS. We will accept 
comments from the public on this proposal until August 11, 2025. If we 
finalize approval, we will incorporate the rule and rescissions into 
the federally enforceable SIP.

III. Incorporation by Reference

    In this document, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA 
rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In 
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to 
incorporate by reference MDAQMD Rule 102, ``Definition of Terms,'' 
amended on September 28, 2020, that states the definitions of terms 
used in MDAQMD rules. The EPA is also proposing to remove SBCAPCD Rule 
102 and RCAPCD Rule 102 as described in table 2 of this preamble from 
the California SIP, which are incorporated by reference in accordance 
with the requirements of 1 CFR part 51. The EPA has made, and will 
continue to make, these materials available through <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> and at the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the 
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of 
this preamble for more information).

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable 
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
proposed action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting federal 
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those 
imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
    <bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review 
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
    <bullet> Is not subject to Executive Order 14192 (90 FR 9065, 
February 6, 2025) because SIP actions are exempt from review under 
Executive Order 12866;
    <bullet> Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
    <bullet> Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
    <bullet> Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4);
    <bullet> Does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
    <bullet> Is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, 
April 23, 1997) because it proposes to approve a state program;
    <bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
    <bullet> Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA.
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian Tribe 
has demonstrated that a Tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 
Indian country, the rule does not have Tribal implications and will not 
impose substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal 
law as

[[Page 30613]]

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Particulate matter, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: June 30, 2025.
Joshua F.W. Cook,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2025-12867 Filed 7-9-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on July 10, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.