Proposed Rule2025-12866
Approval and Promulgation of State Air Quality Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants; Oklahoma; Control of Emissions From Existing Other Solid Waste Incineration Units, Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerator Units, and Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
July 10, 2025
Issuing agencies
Environmental Protection Agency
Abstract
Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is notifying the public that we have received CAA section 111(d)/129 negative declarations from Oklahoma for existing incinerators subject to the Other Solid Waste Incineration units (OSWI), Hospital/Medical/ Infectious Waste Incinerator units (HMIWI), and Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units (CISWI) Emission Guidelines (EG). These negative declarations certify that existing incinerators subject to the OSWI, HMIWI, and CISWI EG and the requirements of sections 111(d) and 129 of the CAA do not exist within specified jurisdictions in Oklahoma. The EPA is proposing to accept the negative declarations and amend the agency regulations in accordance with the requirements of the CAA. In addition, EPA is withdrawing its prior proposed approval of the Oklahoma CISWI plan revision due to Oklahoma's submission of its negative declaration for incinerators subject to the CISWI EG and its withdrawal of the CISWI plan revision.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 130 (Thursday, July 10, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 130 (Thursday, July 10, 2025)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30616-30620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-12866]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA-R06-OAR-2020-0610; FRL-12763-01-R6]
Approval and Promulgation of State Air Quality Plans for
Designated Facilities and Pollutants; Oklahoma; Control of Emissions
From Existing Other Solid Waste Incineration Units, Hospital/Medical/
Infectious Waste Incinerator Units, and Commercial and Industrial Solid
Waste Incineration Units
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal of proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act), the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is notifying the public that we
have received CAA section 111(d)/129
[[Page 30617]]
negative declarations from Oklahoma for existing incinerators subject
to the Other Solid Waste Incineration units (OSWI), Hospital/Medical/
Infectious Waste Incinerator units (HMIWI), and Commercial and
Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units (CISWI) Emission Guidelines
(EG). These negative declarations certify that existing incinerators
subject to the OSWI, HMIWI, and CISWI EG and the requirements of
sections 111(d) and 129 of the CAA do not exist within specified
jurisdictions in Oklahoma. The EPA is proposing to accept the negative
declarations and amend the agency regulations in accordance with the
requirements of the CAA. In addition, EPA is withdrawing its prior
proposed approval of the Oklahoma CISWI plan revision due to Oklahoma's
submission of its negative declaration for incinerators subject to the
CISWI EG and its withdrawal of the CISWI plan revision.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before August 11, 2025.
As of July 10, 2025, the proposed rule published on July 19, 2024 (89
FR 58685) is withdrawn.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-
2020-0610, at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from <a href="http://Regulations.gov">Regulations.gov</a>. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact
Matthew Gesualdo, (214) 665-6530, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#096e6c7a7c68656d662764687d7d616c7e496c7968276e667f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8aedeff9ffebe6eee5a4e7ebfefee2effdcaeffaeba4ede5fc">[email protected]</span></a>. For the
full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets">https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets</a>.
Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a>. While all documents in the
docket are listed in the index, some information may not be publicly
available due to docket file size restrictions or content (e.g., CBI).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew Gesualdo, EPA Region 6 Office,
Air and Radiation Division--State Planning and Implementation Branch,
(214) 665-6530, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1770726462767b7378397a7663637f72605772677639707861"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f394968086929f979cdd9e9287879b9684b3968392dd949c85">[email protected]</span></a>. We encourage the public to
submit comments via <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. Please call or email
the contact listed above if you need alternative access to material
indexed but not provided in the docket.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA.
I. Background
A. Rulemaking History
On July 10, 2020 (85 FR 41484), we published a proposed rule
notifying the public that we had received CAA section 111(d)/129
negative declarations from Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, New Mexico,
and Albuquerque-Bernalillo County, New Mexico, for existing HMIWI.
These negative declarations certify that HMIWI subject to the
requirements of sections 111(d) and 129 of the CAA do not exist within
the jurisdictions of Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, New Mexico, and
Albuquerque-Bernalillo County. In the final rule on March 2, 2021 (86
FR 12109), we finalized action on the HMIWI negative declarations from
Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, and Albuquerque-Bernalillo County, New
Mexico. In the same rulemaking, we also stated that we would act on the
Oklahoma HMIWI negative declaration in a future, separate rulemaking.
On September 30, 2020, ODEQ submitted revisions to the Oklahoma CAA
section 111(d)/129 CISWI plan to implement and enforce the CISWI EG at
40 CFR part 60, subpart DDDD. EPA proposed to approve these revisions
on July 19, 2024 (89 FR 58685). On September 13, 2024, ODEQ submitted a
negative declaration for incinerators subject to the CISWI EG and
withdrew the 2020 CISWI plan. EPA is withdrawing its proposed approval
of the revised ODEQ CISWI plan following the plan's withdrawal by ODEQ.
EPA will not be taking a final action on the July 19, 2024 (89 FR
58685), proposed approval.
In this proposed rulemaking, we are: (1) re-proposing on the
Oklahoma HMIWI negative declaration as well as (2) proposing on the
Oklahoma OSWI and CISWI negative declarations for the first time. We
are notifying the public that we have received negative declaration
letters from Oklahoma for incinerators subject to the OSWI, HMIWI, and
CISWI EG and are proposing to amend the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) in accordance with CAA requirements. Details on CAA sections
111(d) and 129, the OSWI, HMIWI, and CISWI EG, and the negative
declarations submitted by Oklahoma can be found in the following
subsections.
B. Clean Air Act Sections 111(d) and 129
Sections 111(d) and 129 of the CAA require states to submit plans
to control certain pollutants (designated pollutants) at existing solid
waste combustor facilities (designated facilities) whenever standards
of performance have been established under section 111(b) for new
sources of the same type, and the EPA has established emission
guidelines for such existing sources. CAA section 129 directs the EPA
to establish standards of performance for new sources (NSPS) and
emissions guidelines (EG) for existing sources for each category of
solid waste incineration unit. Under CAA section 129, NSPS and EG must
contain numerical emissions limitations for particulate matter, opacity
(as appropriate), sulfur dioxide, hydrogen chloride, oxides of
nitrogen, carbon monoxide, lead, cadmium, mercury, and dioxins and
dibenzofurans. While NSPS are directly applicable to affected
facilities, EG for existing units are intended for states to use to
develop a state plan to submit to the EPA. Once approved by the EPA,
the state plan becomes federally enforceable. If a state does not
submit an approvable state plan to the EPA, the EPA is responsible for
developing, implementing, and enforcing a Federal plan.
The regulations at 40 CFR part 60, subpart B, contain general
provisions applicable to the adoption and submittal of state plans for
controlling designated pollutants. Additionally, 40 CFR part 62,
subpart A, provides the procedural framework by which EPA will approve
or disapprove such plans submitted by a state. When existing designated
facilities are located in a state, the state must then develop and
submit a plan for the control of the designated pollutant. However, 40
CFR 60.23(b) and 62.06 provide that if there are no existing sources of
the designated pollutant in the state, the state may submit a letter of
certification to that effect (i.e., negative declaration) in lieu of a
plan. The negative declaration exempts the state from the requirements
of subpart B that require the submittal of a CAA section 111(d)/129
plan.
[[Page 30618]]
C. Other Solid Waste Incineration Units Emission Guidelines
EPA promulgated the OSWI NSPS and EG on December 16, 2005, codified
at 40 CFR part 60, subparts EEEE and FFFF, respectively (70 FR 74870).
Thus, states were required to submit plans for incinerators subject to
the OSWI EG pursuant to sections 111(d) and 129 of the Act and 40 CFR
part 60, subpart B. The designated facilities to which the OSWI EG
apply are existing incinerators \1\ subject to the OSWI EG that
commenced construction on or before December 9, 2004, and were not
modified or reconstructed on or after June 16, 2006, as specified in 40
CFR 60.2991 and 60.2992, with limited exceptions as provided under 40
CFR 60.2993. EPA proposed revisions to the OSWI EG and NSPS on August
31, 2020 (85 FR 54178). These revisions were promulgated on April 17,
2024 (89 FR 27392), removing the title V permitting requirements for
air curtain incinerators (ACIs) that only burn wood waste, clean
lumber, yard waste, or a mixture of those, and are not located at title
V major sources or subject to title V for other reasons. Technical
corrections addressing inadvertent errors in the regulatory text
amended the rule on November 14, 2024 (89 FR 89928).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ These incinerators include both OSWI and air curtain
incinerators (ACI). The ACI that are subject to the OSWI EG at 40
CFR part 60, subpart FFFF, are those ACI that may not fit the
definition of an ``OSWI'' under the OSWI EG due to burning certain
types of wastes. See 40 CFR 60.2994(b) and 40 CFR 60.3078.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Units Emission Guidelines
On September 15, 1997, the EPA first promulgated the HMIWI NSPS at
40 CFR part 60, subpart Ec, and the HMIWI EG at 40 CFR part 60, subpart
Ce (62 FR 48348). The HMIWI NSPS and EG were amended on October 6, 2009
(74 FR 51368), and on April 4, 2011 76 FR 18407). The Federal plan for
HMIWI subject to the EG at subpart Ce was first promulgated on August
15, 2000 (65 FR 49868), at 40 CFR part 62, subpart HHH. The HMIWI
Federal plan was amended on May 13, 2013 (78 FR 28051), to incorporate
the HMIWI EG revisions. As provided under 40 CFR 60.32e(a), the
designated facilities to which the EG apply are HMIWI that: (1)
commenced construction on or before June 20, 1996, or commenced
modification on or before March 16, 1998; or (2) commenced construction
after June 20, 1996, but no later than December 1, 2008, or commenced
modification after March 16, 1998, but no later than April 6, 2010,
with limited exceptions as provided in 40 CFR 60.32e(b) through (h).
E. Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units Emission
Guidelines
On December 1, 2000 (65 FR 75338), EPA promulgated the CISWI NSPS
at 40 CFR part 60, subpart CCCC, and the CISWI EG at 40 CFR part 60,
subpart DDDD. On March 21, 2011 (76 FR 15704), after voluntarily
remanding the 2000 CISWI NSPS and EG, the EPA promulgated revised CISWI
NSPS and EG in a final rule. Correspondingly, on the same date, EPA
promulgated a final rule under the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) to identify which non-hazardous secondary materials, when
used as fuels or ingredients in combustion units, are ``solid wastes''
(March 21, 2011,76 FR 15456).\2\ EPA subsequently promulgated
amendments to both March 21, 2011 rules on February 7, 2013 (78 FR
9112), to clarify several provisions in order to implement the non-
hazardous secondary materials rule as EPA originally intended.
Reconsideration of certain aspects of the final CISWI rule resulted in
minor amendments (81 FR 40956, June 23, 2016).\3\ On April 16, 2019 (84
FR 15846), EPA finalized further amendments to the CISWI NSPS and EG in
order to provide clarity and address implementation issues.\4\ The
CISWI NSPS and EG were significantly revised in the March 21, 2011 (76
FR 15704), and February 7, 2013 (78 FR 9112), rules, and the subsequent
final rule on June 23, 2016 (81 FR 40956), and April 16, 2019 (84 FR
15846), contained minor amendments to the CISWI rules that did not make
any changes to the applicability of the designated facilitates,
including 40 CFR 60.2505, ``Am I affected by this subpart?''. The
Federal plan for CISWI subject to the EG at subpart DDDD was first
promulgated on October 3, 2003 (68 FR 57539), at 40 CFR part 62,
subpart III. The CISWI Federal plan was amended on December 11, 2024
(89 FR 100092), to incorporate the CISWI EG revisions. As provided by
40 CFR 60.2505, the designated facilities to which the CISWI EG apply
are CISWI and air curtain incinerators (ACI) \5\ that commenced
construction on or before June 4, 2010, or for which modification or
reconstruction was commenced on or before August 7, 2013, with limited
exceptions as provided under 40 CFR 60.2555.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See 40 CFR part 241, Solid Wastes Used as Fuels or
Ingredients in Combustion Units, also known as the ``Non-Hazardous
Secondary Material Rule.'' The identification of solid waste in the
Non-Hazardous Secondary Material Rule is used to determine whether a
combustion unit is required to meet the emissions standards for
solid waste incineration units issued under sections 111 and 129 of
the Act, or meet the emissions standards for commercial, industrial,
and institutional boilers issued under section 112 of the Act.
\3\ In the June 23, 2016 (81 FR 40956), final action, the EPA
finalized amendments on these four topics: Definition of
``continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS) data during startup
and shutdown periods;'' particulate matter (PM) limit for the waste-
burning kiln subcategory; fuel variability factor (FVF) for coal-
burning energy recovery units (ERUs); and the definition of
``kiln.''
\4\ In the April 16, 2019 (84 FR 15846), final action, the EPA
made technical amendments to correct and clarify various parts of
the June 23, 2016 (81 FR 40956), final rule; this includes issues
with implementation of the standards, testing and monitoring issues
and inconsistencies, and other regulatory provisions.
\5\ These air curtain incinerators (ACI) that are subject to the
CISWI EG at 40 CFR part 60, subpart DDDD, are those ACI that may not
fit the definition of a ``CISWI'' under the CISWI EG. See 40 CFR
60.2875.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
F. Negative Declarations From Oklahoma
In order to fulfill obligations under CAA sections 111(d) and 129,
the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) submitted
negative declarations for incinerators subject to the OSWI EG, HMIWI
EG, and CISWI EG for its air pollution control jurisdiction. The
submittal of these negative declarations exempts Oklahoma from the
requirement to submit a state plan for incinerators subject to the OSWI
EG under 40 CFR part 60, subpart FFFF, the HMIWI EG under 40 CFR part
60, subpart Ce, and the CISWI EG under 40 CFR part 60, subpart DDDD.
The ODEQ has determined that there are no sources subject to the
OSWI EG, the HMIWI EG, or the CISWI EG in accordance with CAA sections
111(d) and 129 requirements in its individual air pollution control
jurisdiction in Oklahoma. ODEQ submitted their OSWI, HMIWI, and CISWI
negative declaration letters to the EPA on August 10, 2020, April 1,
2020, and September 13, 2024, respectively. ODEQ subsequently confirmed
to EPA on November 4, 2024, that its OSWI negative declaration letter,
dated August 10, 2020, its HMIWI negative declaration letter, dated
April 1, 2020, and its CISWI negative declaration letter, dated
September 13, 2024, cover all areas within Oklahoma with the exception
of the excluded Indian country lands.\6\ Copies of ODEQ's
[[Page 30619]]
negative declaration letters are included in the docket for this
proposed rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The OSWI and HMIWI confirmation email from ODEQ, dated
February 2, 2021, can be found in the docket at Document ID No. EPA-
R06-OAR-2020-0610. The CISWI confirmation email from ODEQ, dated
November 4, 2024, can be found in the docket at Document ID No. EPA-
R06-OAR-2020-0610.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Proposed Action
The EPA is proposing to amend 40 CFR part 62, subpart LL, to
reflect receipt of the negative declaration letters from ODEQ,
submitted on August 10, 2020, April 1, 2020, and September 13, 2024,
respectively, certifying that there are no incinerators subject to the
OSWI EG at 40 CFR part 60, subpart FFFF, the HMIWI EG at 40 CFR part
60, subpart Ce, and the CISWI EG at 40 CFR part 60, subpart DDDD under
the specified jurisdictions of Oklahoma in accordance with 40 CFR
60.2982, 40 CFR 60.2510, 40 CFR 60.23(b), 40 CFR 62.06, and sections
111(d) and 129 of the CAA. EPA is also withdrawing its proposed
approval of the revised ODEQ CISWI plan following the plan's withdrawal
by ODEQ. EPA will not be taking a final action on the July 19, 2024 (89
FR 58685), proposed approval.
III. Impact on Areas of Indian Country
Following the U.S. Supreme Court decision in McGirt v Oklahoma, 140
S. Ct. 2452 (2020), the Governor of the State of Oklahoma requested
approval under section 10211(a) of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible,
Efficient Transportation Equity Act of 2005: A Legacy for Users, Public
Law 109-59, 119 Stat. 1144, 1937 (August 10, 2005) (``SAFETEA''), to
administer in certain areas of Indian country (as defined at 18 U.S.C.
1151) the State's environmental regulatory programs that were
previously approved by the EPA outside of Indian country. The State's
request excluded certain areas of Indian country further described
below.
The EPA has approved Oklahoma's SAFETEA request to administer all
of the States's EPA-approved environmental regulatory programs in the
requested areas of Indian country. As requested by Oklahoma, EPA's
approval under SAFETEA does not include Indian country lands, including
rights-of-way running through the same, that: (1) qualify as Indian
allotments, the Indian titles to which have not been extinguished,
under 18 U.S.C. 1151(c); (2) are held in trust by the United States on
behalf of an individual Indian or Tribe; or (3) are owned in fee by a
Tribe, if the Tribe (a) acquired that fee title to such land, or an
area that included such land, in accordance with a treaty with the
United States to which such Tribe was a party, and (b) never allotted
the land to a member or citizen of the Tribe (collectively ``excluded
Indian country lands'').
The EPA's approval under SAFETEA expressly provided that to the
extent the EPA's prior approvals of Oklahoma's environmental programs
excluded Indian country, any such exclusions are superseded for the
geographic areas of Indian country covered by the EPA's approval of
Oklahoma's SAFETEA request.\7\ The approval also provided that future
revisions or amendments to Oklahoma's approved environmental regulatory
programs would extend to the covered areas of Indian country (without
any further need for additional requests under SAFETEA).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The EPA's prior approvals relating to Oklahoma's state plans
frequently noted that the state plans were not approved to apply in
areas of Indian country (except as explained in the D.C. Circuit's
decision in ODEQ v. EPA) located in the State. See, e.g., 89 FR
58685 (July 19, 2024). Such prior expressed limitations are
superseded by the EPA's approval of Oklahoma's SAFETEA request.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As explained above, the EPA is proposing to amend 40 CFR part 62,
subpart LL, to reflect receipt of negative declaration letters for
incinerators subject to the OSWI EG, HMIWI EG, and CISWI EG which will
apply statewide in Oklahoma, including to all areas of Indian country
in the State of Oklahoma other than the excluded Indian country lands
as described above.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a CAA
section 111(d)/129 submission that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7411(d); 42 U.S.C.
7429; 40 CFR part 60, subparts B and Cf; and 40 CFR part 62, subpart A.
Thus, in reviewing CAA section 111(d)/129 state plan submissions, EPA's
role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria
of the Act and implementing regulations. Accordingly, this action
merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements
and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. For that reason:
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action as defined in
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and was therefore
not subject to a requirement for Executive Order 12866 review.
B. Executive Order 14192: Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation
This action is not an Executive Order 14192 regulatory action
because this action is not significant under Executive Order 12866.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) because it does not contain any
information collection activities.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
This action is certified to not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.). This action will approve a state plan pursuant to CAA section
111(d)/129 and will therefore have no net regulatory burden for all
directly regulated small entities.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. This action imposes no enforceable duty on any
State, local, or tribal governments or the private sector.
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
The negative declarations for incinerators subject to the OSWI EG,
HMIWI EG, and CISWI EG will apply, if finalized as proposed, to certain
areas of Indian country throughout Oklahoma as discussed in the
preamble, and therefore EPA acceptance of them will have tribal
implications as specified in E.O. 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000). However, this action will neither impose substantial direct
compliance costs on federally recognized tribal governments, nor
preempt tribal law. This action will not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on federally recognized tribal governments because no
actions will be required of tribal governments. This action will also
not preempt tribal law as no Oklahoma tribe implements a regulatory
program under the CAA, and thus does not have applicable or related
tribal laws. Consistent with the EPA Policy on Consultation with Indian
Tribes (December 7, 2023), the EPA has offered consultation to tribal
governments that
[[Page 30620]]
may be affected by this action and provided information about this
action.
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997)
as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern environmental
health or safety risks that EPA has reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, per the definitions of ``covered
regulatory action'' in section 2-202 of the Executive Order. Therefore,
this action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it approves
a state program.
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution and Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355,
May 22, 2001), because it is not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
This rulemaking does not involve technical standards. This action
is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note)
because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with
the Clean Air Act.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Waste treatment and disposal.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: June 26, 2025.
Walter Mason,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2025-12866 Filed 7-9-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on July 10, 2025.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.