Notice2025-12044

Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Algeria, Egypt, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigations

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
June 30, 2025

Issuing agencies

Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 123 (Monday, June 30, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 123 (Monday, June 30, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27838-27841]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-12044]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-721-002, C-729-806, C-552-854]


Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Algeria, Egypt, and the 
Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of Countervailing Duty 
Investigations

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.


DATES: Applicable June 24, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shane Subler or Henry Wolfe at (202) 
482-6241 or (202) 482-0574, respectively, (Algeria), Lingjun Wang at 
(202) 482-2316 (Egypt), and Christopher Williams at (202) 482-5166 (the 
Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam)), AD/CVD Operations, 
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 
20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Petitions

    On June 4, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) 
received countervailing duty (CVD) petitions concerning imports of 
steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from Algeria, Egypt, and Vietnam 
filed in proper form on behalf of the Rebar Trade Action Coalition (the 
petitioner) and its individual members, domestic producers of rebar.\1\ 
The CVD Petitions were accompanied by antidumping duty (AD) petitions 
concerning imports of rebar from Algeria, Bulgaria, Egypt, and 
Vietnam.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Petitions for the Imposition of 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duties,'' dated June 4, 2025 
(Petitions). The individual members of the Rebar Trade Action 
Coalition are Byer Steel Corporation, Commercial Metals Company, 
Gerdau Ameristeel US Inc., Nucor Corporation, Optimus Steel, and 
Steel Dynamics, Inc.
    \2\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Between June 10 and 20, 2025, Commerce requested supplemental 
information pertaining to certain aspects of the Petitions in 
supplemental questionnaires.\3\ Between June 13 and 23, 2025, the 
petitioner filed timely responses to these requests for additional 
information.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Commerce's Letters, ``Supplemental Questions,'' dated 
June 9, 2025 (First General Issues Questionnaire), First Country-
Specific CVD Supplemental Questionnaires: Algeria CVD Supplemental 
and Egypt CVD Supplemental, dated June 10, 2025, and Second Country-
Specific CVD Supplemental Questionnaires: Second Algeria CVD 
Supplemental and Second Egypt CVD Supplemental, dated June 18 and 
20, 2025; see also Memorandum, ``Teleconference with Counsel to the 
Petitioner,'' dated June 20, 2025 (June 20, 2025, Memorandum).
    \4\ See Petitioner's Letters, ``Petitioners' Response to 
Supplemental Questions--General Issues,'' dated June 11, 2025 (First 
General Issues Supplement) and ``Petitioner's Response to the 2nd 
Supplemental Questionnaire Regarding Common Issues and Injury Volume 
I of the Petition,'' dated June 23, 2025 (Second General Issues 
Supplement); see also Country-Specific CVD Supplemental Responses: 
Algeria CVD Supplement and Egypt CVD Supplement,'' dated June 13 and 
16, 2025; and Second Country-Specific CVD Supplemental Responses: 
Second Algeria CVD Supplement and Second Egypt CVD Supplement, dated 
June 23, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with section 702(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (the Act), the petitioner alleges that the Government of 
Algeria (GOA), Government of Egypt (GOE), and Government of Vietnam 
(GOV) (collectively, Governments) are providing countervailable 
subsidies, within the meaning of sections 701 and 771(5) of the Act, to 
producers of rebar in Algeria, Egypt, and Vietnam, and that such 
imports are materially injuring, or threatening material injury to, the 
domestic industry producing rebar in the United States. Consistent with 
section 702(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.202(b), for those alleged 
programs on which we are initiating CVD investigations, the Petitions 
were accompanied by information reasonably available to the petitioner 
supporting its allegations.
    Commerce finds that the petitioner filed the Petitions on behalf of 
the domestic industry, because the petitioner and its individual 
members are interested parties, as defined in sections 771(9)(C) and 
(F) of the Act. Commerce also finds that the petitioner demonstrated 
sufficient industry support with respect to the initiation of the 
requested CVD investigations.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See section on ``Determination of Industry Support for the 
Petitions,'' infra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Periods of Investigation

    Because the Petitions were filed on June 4, 2025, the period of 
investigation for the Algeria, Egypt, and Vietnam CVD investigations is 
January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See 19 CFR 351.204(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Investigations

    The product covered by these investigations is rebar from Algeria, 
Egypt, and Vietnam. For a full description of the scope of these 
investigations, see the appendix to this notice.

Comments on the Scope of the Investigations

    On June 20, 2025, Commerce requested information and clarification 
from the petitioner regarding the proposed scope to ensure that the 
scope language in the Petitions is an accurate reflection of the 
products for which the domestic industry is seeking relief.\7\ On June 
23, 2025, the petitioner provided clarifications.\8\ The description of 
merchandise covered by these investigations, as described in the 
appendix to this notice, reflects these clarifications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See June 20, 2025, Memorandum.
    \8\ See Second General Issues Supplement at 1-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As discussed in the Preamble to Commerce's regulations, we are 
setting aside a period for interested parties to raise issues regarding 
product coverage (i.e., scope).\9\ Commerce will consider all comments 
received from interested parties and, if necessary, will consult with 
interested parties prior to the issuance of the preliminary 
determinations. If scope comments include factual information, all such 
factual information should be limited to public information.\10\ 
Commerce requests that interested parties provide at the beginning of 
their scope comments a public executive summary for each comment or 
issue raised in their submission. Commerce further requests that 
interested parties limit their public executive summary of each comment 
or issue to no more than 450 words, not including citations. Commerce 
intends to use the public executive summaries as the basis of the 
comment summaries included in the analysis of scope comments. To 
facilitate preparation of its questionnaires, Commerce requests that 
scope comments be submitted by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on July 14, 
2025, which is 20 calendar days from the signature date of this notice. 
Any rebuttal comments, which may include factual information, and 
should also be limited to public information, must be

[[Page 27839]]

filed by 5:00 p.m. ET on July 24, 2025, which is 10 calendar days from 
the initial comment deadline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties; Final Rule, 
62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997) (Preamble).
    \10\ See 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) (defining ``factual 
information'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce requests that any factual information that parties 
consider relevant to the scope of these investigations be submitted 
during that time period. However, if a party subsequently finds that 
additional factual information pertaining to the scope of the 
investigations may be relevant, the party must contact Commerce and 
request permission to submit the additional information. All scope 
comments must be filed simultaneously on the records of the concurrent 
AD and CVD investigations.

Filing Requirements

    All submissions to Commerce must be filed electronically via 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), unless an exception 
applies.\11\ An electronically filed document must be received 
successfully in its entirety by the time and date it is due.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order 
Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011); see also Enforcement and 
Compliance; Change of Electronic Filing System Name, 79 FR 69046 
(November 20, 2014), for details of Commerce's electronic filing 
requirements, effective August 5, 2011. Information on using ACCESS 
can be found at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/help.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/help.aspx</a> and a handbook 
can be found at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/help/Handbook_on_Electronic_Filing_Procedures.pdf">https://access.trade.gov/help/Handbook_on_Electronic_Filing_Procedures.pdf</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consultations

    Pursuant to sections 702(b)(4)(A)(i) and (ii) of the Act, Commerce 
notified the GOA, GOE, and GOV of the receipt of the Petitions and 
provided an opportunity for consultations with respect to the 
Petitions.\12\ Commerce held consultations with the GOV on June 20, 
2025,\13\ and the GOE on June 23, 2025.\14\ The GOA did not request 
consultations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Commerce's Letters, ``Invitation for Consultations to 
Discuss the Countervailing Duty Petition,'' dated June 9, 2025.
    \13\ See Memorandum, ``Consultations with the Government of 
Vietnam,'' dated June 20, 2025; see also GOV's Letter, ``Comments on 
Countervailing Duty Petition,'' dated June 23, 2025.
    \14\ See Memorandum, ``Consultations with the Government of 
Egypt,'' dated June 23, 2025; see also GOE's Letter, ``Consultations 
Statement,'' dated June 23, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Determination of Industry Support for the Petitions

    Section 702(b)(1) of the Act requires that a petition be filed on 
behalf of the domestic industry. Section 702(c)(4)(A) of the Act 
provides that a petition meets this requirement if the domestic 
producers or workers who support the petition account for: (i) at least 
25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product; and 
(ii) more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like 
product produced by that portion of the industry expressing support 
for, or opposition to, the petition. Moreover, section 702(c)(4)(D) of 
the Act provides that, if the petition does not establish support of 
domestic producers or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of 
the total production of the domestic like product, Commerce shall: (i) 
poll the industry or rely on other information in order to determine if 
there is support for the petition, as required by subparagraph (A); or 
(ii) determine industry support using a statistically valid sampling 
method to poll the ``industry.''
    Section 771(4)(A) of the Act defines the ``industry'' as the 
producers as a whole of a domestic like product. Thus, to determine 
whether a petition has the requisite industry support, the statute 
directs Commerce to look to producers and workers who produce the 
domestic like product. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), 
which is responsible for determining whether ``the domestic industry'' 
has been injured, must also determine what constitutes a domestic like 
product in order to define the industry. While both Commerce and the 
ITC must apply the same statutory definition regarding the domestic 
like product,\15\ they do so for different purposes and pursuant to a 
separate and distinct authority. In addition, Commerce's determination 
is subject to limitations of time and information. Although this may 
result in different definitions of the like product, such differences 
do not render the decision of either agency contrary to law.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See section 771(10) of the Act.
    \16\ See USEC, Inc. v. United States, 132 F. Supp. 2d 1, 8 (CIT 
2001) (citing Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United States, 688 F. 
Supp. 639, 644 (CIT 1988), aff'd Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United 
States, 865 F.2d 240 (Fed. Cir. 1989)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 771(10) of the Act defines the domestic like product as ``a 
product which is like, or in the absence of like, most similar in 
characteristics and uses with, the article subject to an investigation 
under this title.'' Thus, the reference point from which the domestic 
like product analysis begins is ``the article subject to an 
investigation'' (i.e., the class or kind of merchandise to be 
investigated, which normally will be the scope as defined in the 
petition).
    With regard to the domestic like product, the petitioner does not 
offer a definition of the domestic like product distinct from the scope 
of the investigations.\17\ Based on our analysis of the information 
submitted on the record, we have determined that rebar, as defined in 
the scope, constitutes a single domestic like product, and we have 
analyzed industry support in terms of that domestic like product.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ For a discussion of the domestic like product analysis as 
applied to these cases and information regarding industry support, 
see Checklists, ``Countervailing Duty Investigation Initiation 
Checklists: Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Algeria, Egypt, and 
the Socialist Republic of Vietnam'' dated concurrently with, and 
hereby adopted by, this notice (Country-Specific CVD Initiation 
Checklists), at Attachment II, Analysis of Industry Support for the 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions Covering Steel 
Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Algeria, Bulgaria, Egypt, and the 
Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Attachment II). These checklists are 
on file electronically via ACCESS.
    \18\ For further discussion, see Attachment II of the Country-
Specific CVD Initiation Checklists.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In determining whether the petitioner has standing under section 
702(c)(4)(A) of the Act, we considered the industry support data 
contained in the Petitions with reference to the domestic like product 
as defined in the ``Scope of the Investigations,'' in the appendix to 
this notice. To establish industry support, the petitioners provided 
the 2024 production of the domestic like product for the U.S. producers 
that support the Petitions and compared this to total production of the 
domestic like product by the U.S. rebar industry.\19\ We relied on data 
provided by the petitioner for purposes of measuring industry 
support.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ Id.
    \20\ For further discussion, see Attachment II of the Country-
Specific CVD Initiation Checklists.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Our review of the data provided in the Petitions, the First General 
Issues Supplement, and other information readily available to Commerce 
indicates that the petitioner has established industry support for the 
Petitions.\21\ First, the Petitions established support from domestic 
producers (or workers) accounting for more than 50 percent of the total 
production of the domestic like product and, as such, Commerce is not 
required to take further action in order to evaluate industry support 
(e.g., polling).\22\ Second, the domestic producers (or workers) have 
met the statutory criteria for industry support under section 
702(c)(4)(A)(i) of the Act because the domestic producers (or workers) 
who support the Petitions account for at least 25 percent of the total 
production of the domestic like product.\23\ Finally, the domestic 
producers (or workers) have met the statutory criteria for industry 
support

[[Page 27840]]

under section 702(c)(4)(A)(ii) of the Act because the domestic 
producers (or workers) who support the Petitions account for more than 
50 percent of the production of the domestic like product produced by 
that portion of the industry expressing support for, or opposition to, 
the Petitions.\24\ Accordingly, Commerce determines that the Petitions 
were filed on behalf of the domestic industry within the meaning of 
section 702(b)(1) of the Act.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ Id.
    \22\ Id.; see also section 702(c)(4)(D) of the Act.
    \23\ See Attachment II of the Country-Specific CVD Initiation 
Checklists.
    \24\ Id.
    \25\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Injury Test

    Because Egypt and Vietnam are ``Subsidies Agreement Countries'' 
within the meaning of section 701(b) of the Act, section 701(a)(2) of 
the Act applies to these investigations.\26\ Accordingly, the ITC must 
determine whether imports of the subject merchandise from Egypt and/or 
Vietnam materially injure, or threaten material injury to, a U.S. 
industry.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ We note that Algeria is not a member of the World Trade 
Organization. As such, it is unclear whether Algeria is a 
``Subsidies Agreement Country'' within the meaning of section 701(b) 
of the Act, and whether the ITC is required to determine whether the 
allegedly subsidized imports of subject merchandise from Algeria 
materially injure or threaten material injury to, a U.S. industry. 
For purposes of these initiations, we have considered the 
petitioner's injury allegation as a whole, regardless of whether 
Algeria meets the provisions for ``Subsidies Agreement Country'' 
under sections 702(b)(2) or 702(b)(3) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and Causation

    The petitioner alleges that imports of the subject merchandise are 
benefiting from countervailable subsidies and that such imports are 
causing, or threaten to cause, material injury to the U.S. industry 
producing the domestic like product. In addition, the petitioner 
alleges that subject imports from Algeria, Egypt, and Vietnam 
individually exceed the negligibility threshold provided for under 
section 771(24)(A) of the Act.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ For further information regarding negligibility and the 
injury allegation, see Country-Specific CVD Initiation Checklists at 
Attachment III, Analysis of Allegations and Evidence of Material 
Injury and Causation for the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing 
Duty Petitions Covering Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Algeria, 
Bulgaria, Egypt, and Vietnam (Attachment III).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The petitioner contends that the industry's injured condition is 
illustrated by the significant volume of subject imports; reduced 
market share; underselling and price depression and/or suppression; 
lost sales and revenues; and declines in the domestic industry's 
production, capacity utilization, shipment values, and financial 
performance.\28\ We assessed the allegations and supporting evidence 
regarding material injury, threat of material injury, causation, 
cumulation, as well as negligibility, and we have determined that these 
allegations are properly supported by adequate evidence and meet the 
statutory requirements for initiation.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ See Attachment III of the Country-Specific CVD Initiation 
Checklists.
    \29\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Initiation of CVD Investigations

    Based upon the examination of the Petitions and supplemental 
responses, we find that they meet the requirements of section 702 of 
the Act. Therefore, we are initiating CVD investigations to determine 
whether imports of rebar from Algeria, Egypt, and Vietnam benefit from 
countervailable subsidies conferred by the GOA, GOE, and GOV, 
respectively. In accordance with section 703(b)(1) of the Act and 19 
CFR 351.205(b)(1), unless postponed, we will make our preliminary 
determinations no later than 65 days after the date of this initiation.

Algeria

    Based on our review of the Petitions, we find that there is 
sufficient information to initiate a CVD investigation on 24 programs 
alleged by the petitioner. For a full discussion of the basis for our 
decision to initiate on each program, see the Algeria CVD Initiation 
Checklist. A public version of the initiation checklist for this 
investigation is available on ACCESS.

Egypt

    Based on our review of the Petitions, we find that there is 
sufficient information to initiate a CVD investigation on 25 programs 
alleged by the petitioner. For a full discussion of the basis for our 
decision to initiate on each program, see the Egypt CVD Initiation 
Checklist. A public version of the initiation checklist for this 
investigation is available on ACCESS.

Vietnam

    Based on our review of the Petitions, we find that there is 
sufficient information to initiate a CVD investigation on 39 programs 
alleged by the petitioner. For a full discussion of the basis for our 
decision to initiate on each program, see the Vietnam CVD Initiation 
Checklist. A public version of the initiation checklist for this 
investigation is available on ACCESS.

Respondent Selection

Algeria, Egypt, and Vietnam

    In the Petitions, the petitioners identified four companies in 
Algeria, 13 companies in Egypt, and 10 companies in Vietnam as 
producers and/or exporters of rebar.\30\ Commerce intends to follow its 
standard practice in CVD investigations and calculate company-specific 
subsidy rates in the investigations. Following standard practice in CVD 
investigations, in the event Commerce determines that the number of 
companies is large, and it cannot individually examine each company 
based upon Commerce's resources, where appropriate, Commerce intends to 
select mandatory respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) data for imports under the appropriate Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheading(s) listed in 
the ``Scope of the Investigations,'' in the appendix.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ See Petitions at Volume I (page 18 and Exhibit I-10).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On June 23, 2025, Commerce released CBP data on imports of rebar 
from Algeria, Egypt, and Vietnam under administrative protective order 
(APO) to all parties with access to information protected by APO and 
indicated that interested parties wishing to comment on CBP data and/or 
respondent selection must do so within three business days of the 
publication date of the notice of initiation of these 
investigations.\31\ Comments must be filed electronically using ACCESS. 
An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its 
entirety via ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. ET on the specified deadline. Commerce 
will not accept rebuttal comments regarding the CBP data or respondent 
selection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ See Country-Specific Memoranda, ``Release of U.S. Customs 
and Border Protection Entry Data,'' dated June 23, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(b). Instructions for filing such 
applications may be found on Commerce's website at <a href="https://www.trade.gov/administrative-protective-orders">https://www.trade.gov/administrative-protective-orders</a>.

Distribution of Copies of the Petitions

    In accordance with section 702(b)(4)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.202(f), a copy of the public version of the Petitions has been 
provided to the GOA, GOE, and GOV via ACCESS. To the extent 
practicable, we will attempt to provide a copy of the public version of 
the Petitions to each exporter named in the Petitions, as provided 
under 19 CFR 351.203(c)(2).

[[Page 27841]]

ITC Notification

    Commerce will notify the ITC of its initiation, as required by 
section 702(d) of the Act.

Preliminary Determinations by the ITC

    The ITC will preliminarily determine, within 45 days after the date 
on which the Petitions were filed, whether there is a reasonable 
indication that imports of rebar from Egypt, and/or Vietnam are 
materially injuring, or threatening material injury to, a U.S. 
industry.\32\ A negative ITC determination for either country will 
result in the investigation being terminated with respect to that 
country.\33\ Otherwise, these CVD investigations will proceed according 
to statutory and regulatory time limits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ See section 703(a)(1) of the Act. As noted above, it is 
unclear whether Algeria is a ``Subsidies Agreement Country'' and 
whether the ITC is required to make a determination with respect to 
the allegedly subsidized imports from Algeria.
    \33\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Submission of Factual Information

    Factual information is defined in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) as: (i) 
evidence submitted in response to questionnaires; (ii) evidence 
submitted in support of allegations; (iii) publicly available 
information to value factors of production under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or 
to measure the adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2); 
(iv) evidence placed on the record by Commerce; and (v) evidence other 
than factual information described in (i)-(iv). Section 351.301(b) of 
Commerce's regulations requires any party, when submitting factual 
information, to specify under which subsection of 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) 
the information is being submitted \34\ and, if the information is 
submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct factual information already on 
the record, to provide an explanation identifying the information 
already on the record that the factual information seeks to rebut, 
clarify, or correct.\35\ Time limits for the submission of factual 
information are addressed in 19 CFR 351.301, which provides specific 
time limits based on the type of factual information being submitted. 
Interested parties should review the regulations prior to submitting 
factual information in these investigations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b).
    \35\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Extensions of Time Limits

    Parties may request an extension of time limits before the 
expiration of a time limit established under 19 CFR 351.301, or as 
otherwise specified by Commerce. In general, an extension request will 
be considered untimely if it is filed after the expiration of the time 
limit established under 19 CFR 351.301, or as otherwise specified by 
Commerce.\36\ For submissions that are due from multiple parties 
simultaneously, an extension request will be considered untimely if it 
is filed after 10:00 a.m. ET on the due date. Under certain 
circumstances, Commerce may elect to specify a different time limit by 
which extension requests will be considered untimely for submissions 
which are due from multiple parties simultaneously. In such a case, we 
will inform parties in a letter or memorandum of the deadline 
(including a specified time) by which extension requests must be filed 
to be considered timely. An extension request must be made in a 
separate, standalone submission; under limited circumstances we will 
grant untimely filed requests for the extension of time limits, where 
we determine, based on 19 CFR 351.302, that extraordinary circumstances 
exist. Parties should review Commerce's regulations concerning the 
extension of time limits and the Time Limits Final Rule prior to 
submitting factual information in these investigations.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \36\ See 19 CFR 351.302.
    \37\ See 19 CFR 351.301; see also Extension of Time Limits; 
Final Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013) (Time Limits Final 
Rule), available at <a href="https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm">https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Certification Requirements

    Any party submitting factual information in an AD or CVD proceeding 
must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information.\38\ 
Parties must use the certification formats provided in 19 CFR 
351.303(g).\39\ Commerce intends to reject factual submissions if the 
submitting party does not comply with the applicable certification 
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \38\ See section 782(b) of the Act.
    \39\ See Certification of Factual Information to Import 
Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also 
frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available at 
<a href="https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf">https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Interested Parties

    Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Parties wishing to participate 
in these investigations should ensure that they meet the requirements 
of 19 CFR 351.103(d) (e.g., by filing the required letters of 
appearance). Note that Commerce has amended certain of its requirements 
pertaining to the service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).\40\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \40\ See Administrative Protective Order, Service, and Other 
Procedures in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR 
67069 (September 29, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice is issued and published pursuant to sections 702 and 
777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.203(c).

    Dated: June 24, 2025.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

Scope of the Investigations

    The merchandise subject to these investigations is steel 
concrete reinforcing bar imported in either straight length or coil 
form (rebar) regardless of metallurgy, length, diameter, or grade or 
lack thereof.
    The subject merchandise includes rebar that has been further 
processed in the subject countries or a third country, including but 
not limited to cutting, grinding, galvanizing, painting, coating, or 
any other processing that would not otherwise remove the merchandise 
from the scope of these investigations if performed in the country 
of manufacture of the rebar.
    Specifically excluded are plain rounds (i.e., nondeformed or 
smooth rebar).
    The subject merchandise is classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) primarily under item numbers 
7213.10.0000, 7214.20.0000, and 7228.30.8010. The subject 
merchandise may also enter under other HTSUS numbers including 
7221.00.0017, 7221.00.0018, 7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045, 
7222.11.0001, 7222.11.0057, 7222.11.0059, 7222.30.0001, 
7227.20.0080, 7227.90.6030, 7227.90.6035, 7227.90.6040, 
7228.20.1000, and 7228.60.6000. HTSUS numbers are provided for 
convenience and customs purposes; however, the written description 
of the scope remains dispositive.

[FR Doc. 2025-12044 Filed 6-27-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on June 30, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.