Rule2025-11373
Air Plan Approval; New York; Fuel Composition and Use
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
June 20, 2025
Effective
July 21, 2025
Issuing agencies
Environmental Protection Agency
Abstract
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving revisions to the New York State Implementation Plan (SIP) concerning the control and reduction of sulfur and particulate matter emissions from facilities in New York State. The SIP revisions consist of amendments to regulations outlined within New York's Codes, Rules and Regulations (NYCRR) for sulfur in fuel limits and the use of waste oil as fuel. The intended effect of the revisions is to approve control strategies, required by the Clean Air Act (CAA), which will result in emission reductions that will help attain and maintain National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for sulfur dioxide and fine particulate matter emissions throughout New York State. Additionally, the revisions will establish applicability criteria, composition limits, and permitting requirements for waste oils; provide monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements for facilities that are determined eligible to burn waste oil; update conditions required for the firing of waste oils in space heaters at automotive maintenance/service facilities to align with both Federal and New York State hazardous waste regulations; and simplify and streamline implementation of the regulation through the correction of typographical errors and elimination of obsolete regulatory references within provisions. This action is being taken in accordance with the requirements of the CAA.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 117 (Friday, June 20, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 117 (Friday, June 20, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26209-26213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-11373]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R02-OAR-2021-0361, FRL-10180-02-R2]
Air Plan Approval; New York; Fuel Composition and Use
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving
revisions to the New York State Implementation Plan (SIP) concerning
the control and reduction of sulfur and particulate matter emissions
from facilities in New York State. The SIP revisions consist of
amendments to regulations outlined within New York's Codes, Rules and
Regulations (NYCRR) for sulfur in fuel limits and the use of waste oil
as fuel. The intended effect of the revisions is to approve control
strategies, required by the Clean Air Act (CAA), which will result in
emission reductions that will help attain and maintain National Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for sulfur dioxide and fine particulate
matter emissions throughout New York State. Additionally, the revisions
will establish applicability criteria, composition limits, and
permitting requirements for waste oils; provide monitoring,
recordkeeping, and reporting requirements for facilities that are
determined eligible to burn waste
[[Page 26210]]
oil; update conditions required for the firing of waste oils in space
heaters at automotive maintenance/service facilities to align with both
Federal and New York State hazardous waste regulations; and simplify
and streamline implementation of the regulation through the correction
of typographical errors and elimination of obsolete regulatory
references within provisions. This action is being taken in accordance
with the requirements of the CAA.
DATES: This final rule is effective on July 21, 2025.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID Number EPA-R02-OAR-2021-0361. All documents in the docket are
listed on the <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Controlled
Unclassified Information (CUI) (formerly referred to as Confidential
Business Information (CBI)) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available electronically through <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicholas Ferreira, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 2, Air Programs Branch, 290 Broadway, New
York, New York 10007-1866, at (212) 637-3127, or by email at
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3a7c5f48485f53485b147453595255565b497a5f4a5b145d554c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1d5b786f6f78746f7c3353747e7572717c6e5d786d7c337a726b">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. What is the background for this action?
II. What comments were received in response to the EPA's proposed
action?
III. What action is the EPA taking?
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is the background for this action?
On October 25, 2022, the EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (87 FR 64428) that proposed to approve revisions to the New
York SIP which were submitted to the EPA by the New York State
Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) on August 26, 2020,
and March 2, 2021.
This SIP revision includes revisions to Title 6 of the NYCRR part
225, ``Fuel Composition and Use,'' subpart 225-2, now entitled, ``Fuel
Composition and Use--Waste Oil as a Fuel''; in conjunction with
attendant revisions to part 200, ``General Provisions,'' section 200.1,
``Definitions,'' and section 200.9, ``Referenced material,'' with a
State effective date of April 2, 2020. In addition, this SIP revision
also includes revisions to Title 6 of the NYCRR part 225, ``Fuel
Consumption and Use,'' subpart 225-1, ``Fuel Composition and Use--
Sulfur Limitations,'' with a State effective date of February 4, 2021.
The revisions to part 225 apply to fuel composition and use, limit the
sulfur content of distillate oil, residual oil, and coal fired in
stationary sources; and regulate the burning of waste oils in
combustion, incineration, and process sources throughout New York. The
attendant revisions to 6 NYCRR part 200, ``General Provisions,''
section 200.1, ``Definitions,'' and section 200.9, ``Referenced
material,'' for 6 NYCRR subpart 225-2 have been addressed under
separate rulemakings at 86 FR 54375 (October 1, 2021), effective
November 1, 2021, and 87 FR 52337 (August 25, 2022), effective
September 26, 2022, respectively.
New York's revisions to subpart 225-1 will add process sources and
incinerators as stationary emission sources to prevent these sources
from purchasing and firing fuel that is not compliant with the sulfur-
in-fuel requirements of the regulation, from out-of-state distributors;
lower the sulfur-in-fuel limit for waste oil from 0.75 percent by
weight to 0.25 percent by weight; remove 225-1.3(e) which New York
determined to be redundant, and paragraph 225-1.4(c)(2), which the
State also determined to be outdated and less stringent; as well as
correct other typographical errors. Overall, New York's revisions to
subpart 225-1 will ensure the firing of waste oils is regulated within
provisions under subpart 225-1.
New York's subpart 225-2 is repealed and replaced with the newly
titled ``Fuel Composition and Use--Waste Oil as a Fuel.'' The State's
new subpart 225-2 will continue to regulate the burning of waste oils
in combustion, incineration, and process sources throughout the State
by establishing the applicability criteria, composition limits, and
permitting requirements for waste oils; simplify and streamline
implementation of the regulation through the elimination of obsolete
regulatory references; and update the permitting process to include
monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements that align with 6
NYCRR Part 201, ``Permits and Registrations,'' and Title V criteria
found in the CAA. Additional revisions to subpart 225-2 will also
remove outdated references to liquid waste transportation regulations;
move regulations pertaining to the burning of chemical waste and ``off-
spec'' waste oils (i.e., Waste Fuel B) to 6 NYCRR Part 212, ``Process
Operations,'' or Parts 370-376 as appropriate; and clarify the
regulation's process for the burning of waste oil while removing the
term ``waste fuel.'' Furthermore, based on comments NYSDEC received
during the public comment period, New York included arsenic (5ppm),
cadmium (2 ppm), and chromium (10 ppm) and their corresponding limits
in Table 1 of this subpart.
The specific details of New York's SIP submittal and rationale for
the EPA's approval are explained in the EPA's proposed rulemaking and
are not restated in this final action. For this detailed information,
the reader is referred to the EPA's October 25, 2022, proposed
rulemaking. See 87 FR 64428.
II. What comments were received in response to the EPA's proposed
action?
In response to the EPA's October 25, 2022, proposed rulemaking on
New York's SIP revisions, two comments were received during the 30-day
public comment period. The specific comments may be viewed under Docket
ID Number EPA-R02-OAR-2021-0361 on the <a href="https://regulations.gov">https://regulations.gov</a> website.
Comment 1:
The first public comment, received on November 22, 2022, was
submitted by the environmental organization, Sierra Club. The commenter
attached a letter requesting that the EPA reject elements within this
rulemaking that the commenter believes expand the authorized burning of
waste oils in space heaters located in automotive/service facilities,
and instead, urges the EPA to analyze whether such waste oils can be
recycled. The commenter believes it was irrational and arbitrary for
the EPA to not provide an explanation for authorizing the expanded on-
site combustion of used motor oils; as well as any evaluation of
whether these oils can be beneficially reused. The commenter includes
several statements from the EPA, for which the recycling of used oils
is promoted as feasible and environmentally beneficial. Two examples of
businesses which recycle used oil, Safety-Kleen and EcoPower, are
referenced as evidence for the feasibility and emissions reductions
associated with such a recycling program implemented by the EPA. The
commenter concludes by emphasizing the significant role the EPA plays,
with regard to the climate crisis, in pushing forward the recycling of
waste oil and the implementation of high-efficiency heat pump
technologies in place of the on-site burning of waste oil.
[[Page 26211]]
Response 1:
The EPA acknowledges why it would appear beneficial to reject the
expanded allowance of firing waste oil in space heaters located at
automotive and/or service facilities; however, the EPA would like to
clarify that the use of waste oil under such circumstances is already
authorized under the current federally approved version of 225-2, so
long as an owner or operator complies with the provisions associated
with such use of waste oils. To clarify, this rulemaking should not be
interpreted as an expansion of the authorization for the firing of
waste oils in space heaters located in automotive/service facilities,
as provided within the comment the EPA received. Nevertheless, the EPA
would like to provide the rationale for its position to allow the
continued burning of waste oils.
As New York states within its submittal to the EPA, there has been
an increase in the number of ``synthetic'' engine lubricating oils
manufactured from natural gas. These ``synthetic'' oils have virtually
no sulfur content and have resulted in a significant decrease of the
overall sulfur content of waste oil. New York also provides in its
submittal to the EPA that ``the distillate oil pipeline changed over to
15 ppm sulfur distillate oil in 2011 in anticipation of the 2013
Subpart 225-1 changes requiring home heating oil and stationary
combustion sources to fire 15 ppm oil.'' Thus, the EPA expects that
allowing for the burning of waste oil in space heaters located at
automotive/service facilities, which will now be subject to limits
under provisions approved by this rulemaking, to a sulfur content of
0.25 percent by weight (see Section 225-1.2) and limited in the content
of hazardous air pollutants such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB),
arsenic, cadmium, chromium, and lead (see Section 225-2.5), will
provide for an additional source of energy, while also providing
reduced emissions of air pollutants.
Furthermore, the EPA has determined that New York's revised fuel
limitations, which the EPA is approving with this rulemaking, will be
equivalent to the fuel standards of both 40 CFR part 60 ``Standards of
Performance for New Stationary Sources'' and 40 CFR part 63 ``National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants'' at the time of New
York's adoption.
The EPA would also like to emphasize that New York's revisions to
Subpart 225-2, which the EPA is approving with this rulemaking, will
limit the number of facilities authorized to burn waste oil through a
series of provisions approved with this rulemaking. The rulemaking sets
a minimum operating heat input for processing sources or stationary
combustion installations and a minimum charging capacity for
incinerators, among other requirements, that owners or operators of
facilities proposing to burn waste oil must meet to apply for a permit
or registration to burn waste oil. See Section 225-2.4. Owners or
operators of space heaters located in auto maintenance and service
facilities are exempt from these requirements only if they can satisfy
certain conditions regarding the composition limits of waste oil, the
maximum operating heat input, and the location of where waste oil is
generated. Likewise, under Section 225-1.4, ``Variances,'' waste oils
with a sulfur content greater than allowed will be permitted to be
fired only when a facility owner can demonstrate the sulfur dioxide
emissions do not exceed the allowable sulfur dioxide emissions based on
the percent of total heat input from waste fuel.
The EPA realizes its obligation to consider the recycling of used
motor oils and would like to clarify that it finds the regulated
burning of used motor oil to be an effective method in which used and/
or reprocessed motor oils can be reused and recycled. Moreover, the EPA
believes that the regulated burning of used motor oil replaces the need
for facilities to burn fuel oil and natural gas as a source of energy,
which possess a greater potential to negatively impact air quality, by
alleviating the demand of such energy sources, while also reducing the
risk of potential spills and contamination associated with the
transportation of such fuel oils for energy production. Furthermore,
the EPA does promote the recycling of waste oil, as evidenced by the
supporting statements the commenter provides.
Notably, as part of New York's reasoning for reducing the limit for
the amount of sulfur content in waste fuel from 0.75 percent by weight
to 0.25 percent by weight, one of the businesses which recycles used
oil mentioned by the commenter (Safety-Kleen), is one whose records New
York utilized to determine that the waste oil sulfur content in several
million gallons of waste oil between 2016 and 2017 averaged at or below
0.25 percent by weight. Additionally, New York expects the sulfur
content of waste oil to continue to decrease over the next several
years. As a result, it is the EPA's understanding that the State has
determined the impact that provisions within this rulemaking will have
on air quality and that the State is taking the necessary steps in
accordance with the CAA to continue improving air quality.
The EPA would also like to mention that the SIP submittal that was
provided by New York did not include any provisions pertaining
specifically to the recycling of waste oil and no comments were
received during the State's comment period related to this matter. The
EPA has an obligation to evaluate the SIP as it was submitted by the
State. If a SIP submission meets requirements under the CAA, the EPA
must approve the SIP. The EPA is not permitted to require a State to go
beyond what is required by the CAA; and as a result, the EPA does not
believe this matter is a permissible basis for the disapproval of the
provisions subject to this rulemaking.
In conclusion, the EPA finds that this rulemaking is not considered
an expansion allowing for the increased burning of waste oil; rather,
it is an expansion of regulations pertaining to the burning of waste
oils, providing for increased stringency. As a result, the EPA expects
that provisions it is approving with this rulemaking that regulate the
burning of waste oil, which would include used motor oil, will not
result in an increase in the emission of air pollutants, such as sulfur
dioxide. Overall, the EPA believes this rulemaking will strengthen New
York's SIP and should not interfere with any applicable CAA
requirements.
Comment 2:
The second comment, received on November 22, 2022, was submitted by
an environmental studies student attending the University of Wisconsin-
Madison. The commenter begins by acknowledging the significant role the
EPA plays in safeguarding both environmental and human health regarding
air quality. The commenter observes that these revisions appear
overwhelmingly positive and voices support for this rulemaking,
recognizing it will reduce emissions of sulfur compounds and
particulate matter, ensuring compliance with the NAAQS. However, the
commenter expresses over the removal of the requirement that fuel be
combusted at an efficiency rate of 99%, and questions whether this
would decrease fuel combustion, resulting in excess waste fuel.
Additionally, the commenter suggests that the SIP revision may
eventually lead to phasing out the burning of waste fuels entirely,
since the term ``waste fuel'' has been removed from the definitions,
and the revision appears to emphasize removing burning waste fuel. The
commenter questions what impacts such a new non-combustion method of
[[Page 26212]]
removing waste fuel will have on air quality and suggests that it would
have been beneficial for New York to include a section dedicated to
discussing the environmental impacts of the new strategy of treating
waste fuel, including whether the waste fuel will be disposed of in
such a way as to harm human health and the environment, including
whether the waste fuel will be disposed of in such a way as to harm
human health and the environment.
Response 2:
The EPA appreciates the commenter's support of the EPA's proposed
rulemaking. That said, the EPA would like to address the commenter's
concern regarding the removal of the 99% fuel combustion requirement
and clarify that while it may reduce fuel combustion efficiency, which
may potentially result in excess waste fuel, the State has assessed
that an increase in fuel use will not significantly impact air quality.
Although a lower combustion efficiency typically results in incomplete
combustion and a decrease in the heat output of the fuel-burning
equipment, it can reduce emissions per unit of fuel burned while
increasing the total fuel consumption to compensate for the loss of
heat, which can ultimately increase overall emissions. Nonetheless, the
State has determined that the potential air quality impacts from
burning excess waste oil will not be significant and has promulgated
the provisions that EPA is approving with this rulemaking to allow for
the proper handling and utilization of waste oil.
The scope of this approval addresses only air quality impacts;
however, it is against the law to improperly dispose of used oil, and
the EPA has a series of programs pursuant to the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. 6901, et seq. (see, e.g., 40 CFR part 279),
which reduce waste from used oil and address the full scope of this
comment. Additionally, the State has regulations (located at 6 NYCRR
374-2, ``Standards for the Management of Used Oil'') addressing the
issue of proper handling of used oil from waste fuel. In conclusion,
the purpose for the removal of the 99% combustion efficiency limit is
to reduce the financial burden on facilities by eliminating the
requirement to periodically test combustion efficiency, which can cost
a subject facility between $1,000.00 and $5,000.00 per test depending
on equipment size and configuration. While these provisions may result
in excess waste fuel, the EPA believes there are adequate resources
available to handle waste fuel and prevent unnecessary financial burden
imposed on owners and/or operators.
Furthermore, the EPA clarifies that this rulemaking will not phase
out the burning of waste fuels by operation of the removal of the term
``waste fuel'' as the commenter suggests. Revisions under this
rulemaking will simply clarify the regulation's process for the burning
of waste oil while removing the term ``waste fuel''. The term ``waste
fuel'' is deemed interchangeable with the term ``waste oil'' and
therefore becomes obsolete with the passage of these provisions
pertaining to waste oils. This is further evident with the repeal of 6
NYCRR Part 225-2, ``Fuel Composition and Use--Waste Fuel'' and the
replacement of it with 6 NYCRR Subpart 225-2, ``Fuel Composition and
Use--Waste Oil as a Fuel.'' Finally, the SIP that was provided to the
EPA did not include any provisions pertaining to the treatment of waste
fuel, and no comments were received during the State's comment period
related to this matter. Thus, the EPA has evaluated the SIP as it was
submitted by the State to the EPA.
III. What action is the EPA taking?
The EPA is approving New York's SIP revision submittals dated
August 26, 2020, and March 2, 2021, for the purpose of incorporating
the revisions made to 6 NYCRR part 225, ``Fuel Consumption and Use,''
subpart 225-1, ``Fuel Composition and Use--Sulfur Limitations,'' and
subpart 225-2, ``Fuel Composition and Use--Waste Oil as a Fuel,'' with
State effective dates of April 2, 2020 and February 4, 2021,
respectively. The attendant revisions to 6 NYCRR part 200, ``General
Provisions,'' section 200.1, ``Definitions,'' and section 200.9,
``Referenced material,'' for 6 NYCRR subpart 225-2 have been addressed
under separate rulemakings at 86 FR 54375 (October 1, 2021), effective
November 1, 2021, and 87 FR 52337 (August 25, 2022), effective
September 26, 2022, respectively.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that
includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of
1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of 6
NYCRR part 225, ``Fuel Consumption and Use,'' subpart 225-1, ``Fuel
Composition and Use--Sulfur Limitations,'' and subpart 225-2, ``Fuel
Composition and Use--Waste Oil as a Fuel'' described in the amendments
to 40 CFR part 52 as discussed in section I of this preamble. The EPA
has made and will continue to make these materials generally available
through <a href="http://regulations.gov">http://regulations.gov</a>. Therefore, these materials have been
approved by EPA for inclusion in New York's SIP, have been incorporated
by reference by EPA into that SIP, and are fully federally enforceable
under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the
final rule of EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference in
the next update to the SIP compilation.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
<bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
<bullet> Is not subject to Executive Order 14192 (90 FR 9065,
February 6, 2025) because SIP actions are exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866;
<bullet> Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
<bullet> Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
<bullet> Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
<bullet> Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
<bullet> Is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997) because it approves a state program;
<bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
<bullet> Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act.
[[Page 26213]]
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian Tribe has
demonstrated that a Tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have Tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
This action is subject to the Congressional Review Act, and EPA
will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a ``major
rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 19, 2025. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review, nor does it extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the
effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged
later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (see section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur dioxide.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Michael Martucci,
Regional Administrator, Region 2.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart HH--New York
0
2. Amend Sec. 52.1670, in the table in paragraph (c), by revising the
entries ``Title 6, Part 225, Subpart 225-1'' and ``Title 6, Part 225,
Subpart 225-2'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1670 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA--Approved New York State Regulations and Laws
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State EPA approval
State citation Title/subject effective date date Comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Title 6, Part 225, Subpart 225-1.. Fuel Composition and 2/4/2021 6/20/2025 <bullet> EPA approved
use--Sulfur finalized at 90 FR
Limitations. [INSERT FEDERAL
REGISTER PAGE WHERE
THE DOCUMENT
BEGINS].
Title 6, Part 225, Subpart 225-2.. Fuel Composition and 4/2/2020 6/20/2025 <bullet> EPA approved
use--Waste Oil as a finalized at 90 FR
Fuel. [INSERT FEDERAL
REGISTER PAGE WHERE
THE DOCUMENT
BEGINS].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2025-11373 Filed 6-18-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on June 20, 2025.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.