Rule2025-10541

Air Plan Approval; Arizona; Maricopa County Air Quality Department; Correction

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
June 11, 2025
Effective
June 11, 2025

Issuing agencies

Environmental Protection Agency

Abstract

On January 16, 2025, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule in the Federal Register approving revisions to the Maricopa County Air Quality Department (MCAQD or "County") portion of the Arizona State Implementation Plan (SIP). In that rulemaking, the EPA inadvertently published numbering errors in the regulatory text codifying the approval in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). This document corrects the errors in the final rule's regulatory text.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 111 (Wednesday, June 11, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 111 (Wednesday, June 11, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24514-24515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-10541]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2022-0607; FRL-10024-04-R9]


Air Plan Approval; Arizona; Maricopa County Air Quality 
Department; Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Correcting amendments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On January 16, 2025, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 
published a final rule in the Federal Register approving revisions to 
the Maricopa County Air Quality Department (MCAQD or ``County'') 
portion of the Arizona State Implementation Plan (SIP). In that 
rulemaking, the EPA inadvertently published numbering errors in the 
regulatory text codifying the approval in the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR). This document corrects the errors in the final 
rule's regulatory text.

DATES: This action is effective June 11, 2025.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under 
Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2022-0607. All documents in the docket are 
listed on the <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> website. Although listed in 
an index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as 
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be 
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket 
materials are available through <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>, or please 
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section for additional availability information. If you need assistance 
in a language other than English or if you are a person with a 
disability who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, 
please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mae Wang, EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne 
Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, phone: (415) 947-4137, email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7b0c1a151c55161a1e3b1e0b1a551c140d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7f081e111851121e1a3f1a0f1e51181009">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action corrects regulatory text 
affecting 40 CFR part 52 resulting from two inadvertent errors in the 
amendatory instructions in our final rule published January 16, 2025 
(90 FR 4652), approving revisions to the MCAQD portion of the Arizona 
SIP. That rulemaking was related to the County's reasonably available 
control technology (RACT) demonstration for the 2008 8-hour ozone 
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and converted a conditional 
approval and a partial approval/partial disapproval to full approvals. 
This current action does not change the final action taken by the EPA 
on January 16, 2025. This action merely corrects regulatory text to 
properly codify the EPA's previously published final rulemaking.
    40 CFR 52.119, Identification of plan--conditional approvals, 
identifies portions of the Arizona SIP that the EPA has conditionally 
approved under CAA section 110(k)(4). In the January 16, 2025 final 
rule, the amendatory instructions for codifying the conditional 
approval of portions of the County's RACT demonstration to a full 
approval in 40 CFR part 52 specified the deletion of paragraph 
52.119(c)(3). These instructions resulted in paragraph (c) containing 
only introductory text describing a 2017 SIP submittal related to the 
County's RACT demonstration for which there are no longer any remaining 
conditional approvals. The instructions should have instead specified 
deleting the entirety of paragraph 52.119(c), including the 
introductory text. In this action, the EPA is correcting this error and 
deleting the entirety of paragraph 52.119(c).
    Additionally, 40 CFR 52.124, Part D disapproval, identifies 
portions of the Arizona SIP that the EPA has disapproved under CAA 
section 110(k)(3) because they do not meet Part D of title I of the 
CAA. The prior disapproval of portions of the County's RACT 
demonstration related to our January 16, 2025 final rule was previously 
codified at 40 CFR 52.124(b)(2)(i) and our final rule should have only 
deleted this paragraph. However, we inadvertently deleted other 
disapprovals unrelated to our January 16, 2025 action by deleting the 
entirety of 52.124(b). This action will correct the error and revise 40 
CFR 52.124 to recodify the disapproval for other portions of the 
County's RACT demonstration previously listed in 52.124(b)(2)(ii), as 
added by a separate final rule published on January 10, 2025 (90 FR 
1903).
    The EPA has determined that this action falls under the ``good 
cause'' exemption in section 553(b)(B) of the Administrative Procedure 
Act (APA) which, upon finding ``good cause,'' authorizes agencies to 
dispense with public participation where public notice and comment 
procedures are

[[Page 24515]]

impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest. Public 
notice and comment for this action are unnecessary because the 
underlying rule for which these correcting amendments have been 
prepared was already subject to a 30-day comment period. Further, this 
action is consistent with the purpose and rationale of the final rule 
for which inaccurate amendatory instructions are being corrected 
herein. Because this action does not change the EPA's analyses or 
overall actions, no purpose would be served by additional public notice 
and comment. Consequently, additional public notice and comment are 
unnecessary.
    The EPA also finds that there is good cause under APA section 
553(d)(3) for these corrections to become effective on the date of 
publication of this action. Section 553(d)(3) of the APA allows an 
effective date of less than 30 days after publication ``as otherwise 
provided by the agency for good cause found and published with the 
rule.'' 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3). The purpose of the 30-day waiting period 
prescribed in APA section 553(d)(3) is to give affected parties a 
reasonable time to adjust their behavior and prepare before the final 
rule takes effect. This rule does not create any new regulatory 
requirements such that affected parties would need time to prepare 
before the rule takes effect. This action merely corrects inaccurate 
amendatory instructions in a previous rulemaking. For these reasons, 
the EPA finds good cause under APA section 553(d)(3) for these 
corrections to become effective on the date of publication of this 
action.
    This action is subject to the Congressional Review Act (CRA), and 
the EPA will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to 
the Comptroller General of the United States. Section 808 allows the 
issuing agency to make a rule effective sooner than otherwise provided 
by the CRA if the agency makes a good cause finding that notice and 
public procedure is impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the 
public interest. This determination must be supported by a brief 
statement. 5 U.S.C. 808(2). As stated previously, the EPA has made such 
a good cause finding, including the reasons therefore, for this action 
to become effective on the date of publication. This action is not a 
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: May 23, 2025.
Joshua F. W. Cook,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    Accordingly, 40 CFR part 52 is corrected by making the following 
correcting amendments:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart D--Arizona


Sec.  52.119  [Amended]

0
2. In Sec.  52.119, remove and reserve paragraph (c).

0
3. In Sec.  52.124, add paragraph (b) to read as follows:


Sec.  52.124  Part D disapproval.

* * * * *
    (b) The following Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) 
determinations are disapproved because they do not meet the 
requirements of Part D of the Clean Air Act.
    (1) [Reserved].
    (2) Maricopa County Air Quality Department.
    (i) [Reserved].
    (ii) The RACT demonstration titled ``Analysis of Reasonably 
Available Control Technology for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient 
Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) State Implementation Plan (RACT SIP),'' 
only those portions of the document beginning with ``Gasoline Tank 
Trucks And Vapor Collection System Leaks'' on page 34 through the first 
full paragraph on page 35, and Appendix C: CTG RACT Spreadsheet, the 
rows beginning with ``Gasoline Tank Trucks And Vapor Collection System 
Leaks'' on page 65, through ``Service Stations--Stage I'' on pages 67-
69. This demonstration represents the RACT requirement for the 
following source categories: Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks 
from Gasoline Tank Trucks and Vapor Collection Systems (EPA-450/2-78-
051) and Design Criteria for Stage I Vapor Control Systems--Gasoline 
Service Stations (EPA-450/R-75-102).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2025-10541 Filed 6-10-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on June 11, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.