Notice2025-10535

Certain Cellular Base Station Communication Equipment, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of the Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Entire Investigation Based on a License Agreement; Termination of Investigation

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
June 11, 2025

Issuing agencies

International Trade Commission

Abstract

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission ("Commission") has determined not to review an initial determination ("ID") (Order No. 59) of the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ") terminating the entire investigation based on a patent license agreement.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 111 (Wednesday, June 11, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 111 (Wednesday, June 11, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24664-24665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-10535]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1388]


Certain Cellular Base Station Communication Equipment, Components 
Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of the Commission 
Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the 
Entire Investigation Based on a License Agreement; Termination of 
Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission (``Commission'') has determined not to review an initial 
determination (``ID'') (Order No. 59) of the presiding administrative 
law judge (``ALJ'') terminating the entire investigation based on a 
patent license agreement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Link, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3103. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may 
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at <a href="https://edis.usitc.gov">https://edis.usitc.gov</a>. For help accessing EDIS, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d095949983e398b5bca090a5a3b9a4b3feb7bfa6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="490c0d001a7a012c2539093c3a203d2a672e263f">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. General information concerning the Commission may 
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at <a href="https://www.usitc.gov">https://www.usitc.gov</a>. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on 
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal 
on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on January 25, 2024, based on a complaint filed by Motorola Mobility 
LLC (``Complainant'') of Chicago, Illinois. 89 FR 4993 (Jan. 25, 2024). 
The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United 
States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States 
after importation of certain cellular base station communication 
equipment, components thereof, and products containing same by reason 
of infringement of one or more of claims 11 and 14-20 of U.S. Patent 
No. 11,184,130 (``the '130 patent''); claims 11-20 of U.S. Patent No. 
11,601,896 (``the '896 patent''); claims 1-10 and 12-15 of U.S. Patent 
No. 11,284,466 (``the '466 patent''); and claims 12-19 of U.S. Patent 
No. 10,869,234 (``the '234 patent''). Id. The Commission's notice of 
investigation named as respondents Ericsson AB of Stockholm, Sweden; 
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson of Stockholm, Sweden; and Ericsson Inc. 
of Plano, Texas (collectively ``Ericsson''). Id. The Office of Unfair 
Import Investigations was also named as a party in this investigation. 
Id.
    On June 28, 2024, the Commission determined not to review an 
initial determination (Order No. 14) granting Complainant's unopposed 
motion to terminate the investigation as to claims 4, 9, 14, and 19 of 
the '130 patent. Claims 4 and 9 were only asserted for purposes of 
meeting the domestic industry requirement. See Order No. 14 (June 5, 
2024), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (July 1, 2024).
    On August 13, 2024, the Commission determined not to review an 
initial determination (Order No. 20) granting Complainant's unopposed 
motion to terminate the investigation as to claims 8, 10, 18, and 20 
the '130 patent; claims 1-4, 9, 11-14, and 19 of the '896 patent; 
claims 1-2, 4-7, 9-10, 12-13, and 15-17 of the '466 patent; and claims 
1-6, 9, 12-15, and 18 of the '234 patent. See Order No. 20 (July 18, 
2024), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Aug. 14, 2024).
    On September 26, 2024, the Commission determined not to review an 
initial determination (Order No. 34) granting Complainant's unopposed 
motion to terminate the investigation as to claims 7 and 17 of the '130 
patent; claims 5-7 and 15-17 of the '896 patent; and claims 8, 10, 11, 
and 17 of the '234 patent. Claim 7 of the '130 patent, claims 5-7 of 
the '896 patent, and claims 8, 10, and 11 of the '234 patent were only 
asserted for purposes of meeting the domestic industry requirement. See 
Order No. 34 (Sept. 4, 2024), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Sept. 26, 
2024).
    On October 28, 2024, the Commission determined not to review an 
initial determination (Order No. 37) granting Complainant's unopposed 
motion to terminate the investigation as to the remaining asserted 
claims of the '466 patent. See Order No. 37 (Oct. 3, 2024), unreviewed 
by Comm'n Notice (Oct. 28, 2024).
    On April 1, 2025, the Commission determined not to review an 
initial determination (Order No. 54), extending the target date for 
completion of the investigation to August 25, 2025. See Order No. 54 
(Mar. 7, 2025), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (April 1, 2025).
    On April 2, 2025, the Commission determined to review and affirm in 
part an initial determination (Order No. 53) granting Complainant's 
unopposed motion for summary determination that the economic prong of 
the domestic industry requirement is satisfied. See Order No. 53 (Mar. 
3, 2025); Comm'n Notice (Apr. 2, 2025).
    On May 15, 2025, the Commission determined not to review an initial 
determination (Order No. 57), extending the target date for completion 
of the investigation to September 23, 2025. See Order No. 57 (Apr. 24, 
2025), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (May 15, 2025).
    On April 29, 2025, Complainant and Ericsson filed a joint motion to 
terminate the investigation in its entirety based on a patent license 
settlement. On April 30, 2025, OUII filed a response supporting the 
motion.
    On May 8, 2025, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 59), 
terminating the entire investigation based on a patent license 
agreement. No petitions for review of Order No. 59 were filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The 
investigation is terminated in its entirety.
    The Commission vote for this determination took place on June 5, 
2025.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.


[[Page 24665]]


    Issued: June 5, 2025.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2025-10535 Filed 6-10-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-20-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on June 11, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.