Proposed Rule2025-09715
Rescinding Requirements Regarding Bridges on Federal Dams
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
May 30, 2025
Issuing agencies
Transportation DepartmentFederal Highway Administration
Abstract
FHWA is proposing to rescind the rule and regulations issued on October 10, 1974, Bridges on Federal Dams.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 103 (Friday, May 30, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 103 (Friday, May 30, 2025)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22874-22876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-09715]
[[Page 22874]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
23 CFR Part 630
[Docket No. FHWA-2025-0011]
RIN 2125-AG18
Rescinding Requirements Regarding Bridges on Federal Dams
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FHWA is proposing to rescind the rule and regulations issued
on October 10, 1974, Bridges on Federal Dams.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 30, 2025.
ADDRESSES: Mail or hand deliver comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Dockets Management Facility, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590, or submit electronically at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a>.
All comments should include the docket number that appears in the
heading of this document. All comments received will be available for
examination and copying at the above address from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
E.T., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Those desiring
notification of receipt of comments must include a self-addressed,
stamped postcard or may print the acknowledgment page that appears
after submitting comments electronically. Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment,
if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70, Pages
19477-78) or you may visit <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a>.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Samantha Pratt, Office of
Infrastructure, (737) 389-1048, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a4d7c5c9c5cad0ccc58ad4d6c5d0d0e4c0cbd08ac3cbd2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0172606c606f7569602f717360757541656e752f666e77">[email protected]</span></a>, Federal Highway
Administration, 300 East 8th Street, Room 826, Austin, TX 78701; or Mr.
David Serody, Office of the Chief Counsel, (202) 366-4241,
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b5d1d4c3dcd19bc6d0c7dad1ccf5d1dac19bd2dac3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="adc9ccdbc4c983dec8dfc2c9d4edc9c2d983cac2db">[email protected]</span></a>, Federal Highway Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., E.T., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access and Filing
This document and all comments received may be viewed online
through the Federal eRulemaking portal at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a>. The
website is available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. An
electronic copy of this document may also be downloaded by accessing
the Office of the Federal Register's home page at:
<a href="http://www.federalregister.gov">www.federalregister.gov</a>.
Background
FHWA is proposing to rescind the rule issued on October 10, 1974,
Bridges on Federal Dams, via 39 FR 36473, amending 23 CFR part 630,
subpart H. The rule proposed for rescission prescribes procedures for
the construction and financing, by an agency of the Federal Government,
of public highway bridges over dams constructed and owned by or for the
United States. 23 CFR 630.801. The FHWA proposes to rescind 23 CFR part
630, subpart H in full and seek comment on all aspects of that
proposal.
Under 23 U.S.C. 320(a), State Departments of Transportation (DOT),
jointly with the Secretary of Transportation, may determine and certify
to a Federal agency which has jurisdiction over and custody of a dam
constructed or to be constructed and owned by or for the United States
that a public highway bridge upon and across such dam is economically
desirable and needed as a link in the State or Federal-aid highway
systems. The Federal agency may then use funds available to it to
design and construct the dam in such manner that will serve as a
suitable and adequate foundation for a public highway bridge and to
design and construct a public highway bridge upon and across the dam.
23 U.S.C. 320(a). In addition, construction of any bridge upon and
across any dam pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 320 may not start until the State
in which the bridge is to be located, or the appropriate subdivision of
such State, enters into an agreement with the Federal agency and the
Secretary of Transportation to construct the approach roads necessary
to connect such bridge with existing public highways. 23 U.S.C. 320(b).
While a portion of the bridge may be financed wholly with Federal
funds, any approach roads ``shall be financed by the State or its
appropriate subdivision with or without the aid of Federal funds.'' 23
U.S.C. 320(d). Finally, 23 U.S.C. 320(f) makes clear that 23 U.S.C. 320
does not affect any bridge, approach structure, or highway constructed
or to be constructed by a Federal agency to satisfy a legal obligation
incurred independently of 23 U.S.C. 320.
On October 10, 1974, FHWA amended 23 CFR part 630 by adding a new
subpart H. 39 FR 36473. This rule required that a proposed bridge over
a dam constructed and owned by or for the United States, together with
the approach roads to connect the bridge with existing public highways,
must be eligible for inclusion in the Federal-aid highway system. 23
CFR 630.802. The regulation also required that a State's application to
qualify a project under the new subpart to include a certification that
the bridge is economically desirable and needed as a link in the
Federal-aid highway system, a statement showing the source and
availability of funds to be used in construction of the roadway
approaches, and a statement of any obligation on the part of the agency
constructing the dam to provide such bridge or approach roads to
satisfy a legal liability incurred independently of the subpart. 23 CFR
630.803. This subpart has not been amended since its issuance in 1974.
The Secretary of Transportation is pursuing a new policy to reduce
regulatory burdens wherever possible. Under that policy, unless a
regulatory standard is required by statute, the Secretary proposes
eliminating that requirement. As such, to the extent that 23 CFR part
630, subpart H is not required by 23 U.S.C. 320 or other applicable
statute, FHWA is proposing to rescind the regulation. As FHWA does not
believe that 23 U.S.C. 320 contains ambiguity that necessitates
regulations, to the extent that 23 CFR part 630, subpart H has
provisions not required by statute, FHWA believes those provisions
merely duplicate statutory language and are unnecessary. For instance,
23 CFR 630.803(a) merely reiterates language in 23 U.S.C. 320(a) and 23
CFR 630.803(c) reiterates language in 23 U.S.C. 320(f).
Further, as a practical matter, no additional funding for the
construction of bridges on Federal dams has been authorized since the
Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95-599). In Fiscal Year 1994,
Congress rescinded the balance of funds that were made available for
bridges on Federal dams pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 320, leaving no funds
currently available for the work contemplated by 23 CFR part 630,
subpart H. See Public Law 103-211, Title III, Chapter 10. Were Congress
to provide additional funds, FHWA believes the requirements in 23
U.S.C. 320 are sufficiently clear. As such, FHWA is proposing to
rescind the regulations in 23 CFR part 630, subpart H regarding
procedures for the
[[Page 22875]]
construction and financing of public highway bridges over dams
constructed and owned by or for the United States. The FHWA seeks
comment on any reasons to rescind or not to rescind these regulations.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
A. Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), Executive
Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
This proposed rule does not meet the criteria of a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, as amended by
Executive Orders 14215 and 13563. Therefore, the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) has not reviewed this rule under those orders.
This rule would remove requirements for projects that are not
currently funded. While FHWA believes there are deregulatory benefits
to this rule, FHWA believes any monetary benefits or costs to this rule
would be minimal. The FHWA seeks comments on any impacts that could
result from removing the provisions identified in this NPRM.
These changes would not adversely affect, in a material way, any
sector of the economy. In addition, these changes would not interfere
with any action taken or planned by another agency and would not
materially alter the budgetary impact of any entitlements, grants, user
fees, or loan programs. Consequently, a full regulatory evaluation is
not required.
B. Executive Order 14192 (Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation)
This proposed rule is not an E.O. 14192 regulatory action. This
rule would not adversely affect, in a material way, any sector of the
economy. In addition, these changes would not interfere with any action
taken or planned by another agency and would not materially alter the
budgetary impacts of any entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs. Consequently, a full regulatory evaluation is not required.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612) (as
amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996; 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), agencies must prepare and make available
for public comment a regulatory flexibility analysis that describes the
effect of the rule on small entities (i.e., small businesses, small
organizations, and small government jurisdictions). No regulatory
flexibility analysis is required, however, if the head of an agency or
an appropriate designee certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
FHWA has concluded and hereby certifies that this proposed rule would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities; therefore, an analysis is not included. This proposed
rescission would only remove requirements regarding procedures for the
construction and financing of public highway bridges over dams
constructed and owned by or for the United States that are not
otherwise required by statute.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This proposed rule does not impose unfunded mandates as defined by
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4, 109
Stat. 48) for State, local and Tribal governments, or the private
sector of $100 million or more in any one year. Thus, the rule is not
subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
E. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism Assessment)
This action has been analyzed in accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in E.O. 13132. The FHWA has determined that this
action does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism assessment. The FHWA has also determined
that this action would not preempt any State law or State regulation or
affect the States' ability to discharge traditional State governmental
functions.
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501-3520), an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of information, unless the
collection displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number. This proposed rule is deregulatory and so would
not impose any additional information collection requirements.
G. National Environmental Policy Act
FHWA has analyzed this rule pursuant to the NEPA and has determined
that it is categorically excluded under 23 CFR 771.117(c)(2), which
applies to the promulgation of rules, regulations, and directives.
Categorically excluded actions meet the criteria for categorical
exclusions under 23 CFR 771.117(a) and normally do not require any
further NEPA approvals by FHWA. This rule would rescind regulations
regarding procedures for the construction and financing of public
highway bridges over dams constructed and owned by or for the United
States. FHWA does not anticipate any adverse environmental impacts from
this proposed rule, and no unusual circumstances are present under 23
CFR 771.117(b).
H. Executive Order 13175 (Tribal Consultation)
Executive Order 13175 requires Federal agencies to consult and
coordinate with Tribes on a government-to-government basis on policies
that have Tribal implications, including regulations, legislative
comments or proposed legislation, and other policy statements or
actions that have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian
Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian
Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between
the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. FHWA has assessed the impact
of this proposed rule on Indian tribes and determined that this rule
would not have tribal implications that require consultation under
Executive Order 13175.
I. Regulation Identifier Number
A RIN is assigned to each regulatory action listed in the Unified
Agenda of Federal Regulations. The Regulatory Information Service
Center publishes the Unified Agenda in the spring and fall of each
year. The RIN contained in the heading of this document can be used to
cross reference this action with the Unified Agenda.
J. Rulemaking Summary, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(4)
As required by 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(4), a summary of this rule can be
found at <a href="http://regulations.gov">regulations.gov</a>, under the docket number.
List of Subjects in 23 CFR Part 630
Government contracts, Grant programs--transportation, Highway
safety, Highways and roads, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Traffic regulations.
Issued in Washington, DC, under authority delegated in 49 CFR
1.85.
Gloria M. Shepherd,
Executive Director, Federal Highway Administration.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, FHWA proposes to revise
title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, part 630, as set forth below
[[Page 22876]]
PART 630--PRECONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES
0
1. The authority citation for part 630 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 106, 109, 112, 115, 315, and 402(a); Sec.
1110, 1501, and 1503 of Pub. L. 109-59, 119 Stat. 1144; Pub. L. 105-
178, 112 Stat. 193; Pub. L. 104-59, 109 Stat. 582; Pub. L. 97-424,
96 Stat. 2106; Pub. L. 90-495, 82 Stat. 828; Pub. L. 85-767, 72
Stat. 896; Pub. L. 84-627, 70 Stat. 380; Pub. L. 112-141, 126 Stat.
405, sections 1303 and 1405; and 23 CFR 1.32 and 49 CFR 1.81 and
1.85.
Subpart H--[Removed and Reserved]
0
2. Remove and reserve subpart H, consisting of Sec. Sec. 630.801
through 630.803.
[FR Doc. 2025-09715 Filed 5-27-25; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-RY-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on May 30, 2025.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.