Notice2025-09319

Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
May 23, 2025

Issuing agencies

Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Sonha SSP Vietnam Sole Member Company Limited (Sonha SSP) and Vinlong Stainless Steel (Vietnam) Co., Ltd. (Vinlong) sold subject merchandise to the United States at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2023.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 99 (Friday, May 23, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 99 (Friday, May 23, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22060-22062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-09319]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-552-816]


Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe From the Socialist Republic 
of Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 
2022-2023

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that 
Sonha SSP Vietnam Sole Member Company Limited (Sonha SSP) and Vinlong 
Stainless Steel (Vietnam) Co., Ltd. (Vinlong) sold subject merchandise 
to the United States at less than normal value (NV) during the period 
of review (POR) July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2023.

DATES: Applicable May 23, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luke Caruso and Stephanie Trejo, AD/
CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2081 and (202) 
482-4390, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On August 13, 2024, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of 
the 2022-2023 administrative review of the antidumping duty order \1\ 
on welded stainless steel pressure pipe (welded pressure pipe) from the 
Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) in the Federal Register and 
invited interested parties to comment.\2\ On December 3, 2024, Commerce 
fully extended the deadline for the final results of this 
administrative review until February 10, 2025.\3\ On December 9, 2024, 
Commerce tolled certain deadlines in this administrative proceeding by 
ninety days.\4\ For a summary of the events that occurred since the 
Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\5\ 
Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with 
section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from Malaysia, Thailand, 
and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty Orders, 79 
FR 42289 (July 21, 2014) (Order).
    \2\ See Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from the Socialist 
Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2022-2023, 89 FR 65849 (August 13, 2024) 
(Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum.
    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023'' dated December 
3, 2024.
    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings,'' dated December 9, 2024 .
    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 
Order on Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from the Socialist 
Republic of Vietnam; 2023-2023,'' dated concurrently with, and 
hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order <SUP>6</SUP>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The merchandise covered by this Order is circular welded austenitic 
stainless pressure pipe, not greater than 14 inches in outside 
diameter, from Vietnam. For a full description of the scope of the 
Order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Vietnam-Wide Entity

    Under Commerce's policy regarding the conditional review of the 
Vietnam-wide entity,\7\ the Vietnam-wide entity will not be under 
review unless a party specifically requests, or Commerce self-
initiates, a review of the entity. Because no party requested a review 
of the Vietnam-wide entity in this review, the entity is not under 
review, and the entity's rate (i.e., 16.25) is not subject to 
change.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in 
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty 
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity 
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
    \8\ See Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With the exception of Sonha SSP and Vinlong, Commerce considers all 
other companies for which a review was requested and initiated but did 
not demonstrate separate rate eligibility to be part of the Vietnam-
wide entity.\9\ Therefore, for these final results, we continue to 
consider Mejonson Industrial Vietnam Co., Ltd., to be part of the 
Vietnam-wide entity because it did not file a separate rate application 
or certification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 62322 (September 11, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in an interested party's case brief are addressed 
in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of these issues is 
attached as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision 
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at https://

[[Page 22061]]

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.

Changes Since the Preliminary Review

    Based on an analysis of the comments received, we made one change 
to the margin calculation from the Preliminary Results for Sonha 
SSP.\10\ Additionally, we have continued to find that the application 
of facts available with an adverse inference is warranted for Vinlong 
Stainless.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 5.
    \11\ Id. at 3-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Vietnam-Wide Entity

    Because no party requested a review of the Vietnam-wide entity, and 
Commerce no longer considers the Vietnam-wide entity as an exporter 
conditionally subject to administrative reviews,\12\ we did not conduct 
a review of the Vietnam-wide entity. Thus, the weighted-average dumping 
margin for the Vietnam-wide entity (i.e., 16.25 percent) \13\ is not 
subject to change as a result of this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in 
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty 
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity 
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65969-70 (November 
4, 2013).
    \13\ See Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Review

    We determine that the following weighted-average dumping margin 
exists for the period July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2023:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Weighted-average
                      Exporter                          dumping margin
                                                           (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sonha SSP Vietnam Sole Member Company Limited/Sonha               144.59
 International Corporation \14\.....................
Vinlong Stainless Steel (Vietnam) Co., Ltd..........              144.59
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ We are treating these companies as a single entity for 
purposes of this review. For a complete discussion, see Memorandum, 
``Affiliation and Collapsing of Sonha International and Sonha SSP 
Vietnam Sole Member Company Limited,'' dated August 6, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these final 
results of review to interested parties within five days of the date of 
publication of this notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with 
19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protections (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of 
this review. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 
no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final 
results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is 
filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment 
instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until 
the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has 
expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).
    For Sonha SSP which has a final weighted-average dumping margin 
that is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), we 
calculated importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on 
the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for each importer's 
examined sales and the total entered value of the sales, in accordance 
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where the respondent did not report entered 
value, we will calculate importer-specific per-unit duty assessment 
rates based on the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties 
calculated for the examined sales to the total quantity of those sales. 
Where an importer-specific assessment rate is de minimis (i.e., less 
than 0.5 percent), the entries by that importer will be liquidated 
without regard to antidumping duties.
    Pursuant to Commerce's practice, we will instruct CBP to liquidate 
entries from Vinlong at 144.59 percent.
    Pursuant to a refinement in our non-market economy practice, for 
sales that were not reported in the U.S. sales data submitted by Sonha 
SSP or Vinlong, we will instruct CBP to liquidate entries associated 
with those sales at the rate for the Vietnam-wide entity. For entries 
of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Sonha SSP or Vinlong 
for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United 
States, we intend to instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the 
Vietnam-wide rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company or 
companies involved in the transaction.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise from Vietnam entered, or withdrawn 
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as 
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for Sonha SSP and 
Vinlong Stainless the cash deposit rate will be the margin listed 
above; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed Vietnamese and non-
Vietnamese exporters not listed above that have separate rates, the 
cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate 
published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in 
which they were reviewed; (3) for all Vietnamese exporters of subject 
merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, 
the cash deposit rate will be equal to the weighted-average dumping 
margin for the Vietnam-wide entity (i.e., 16.25 percent); \15\ and (4) 
for all non-Vietnamese exporters of subject merchandise which have not 
received their own separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the 
rate applicable to the Vietnamese exporter(s) that supplied that non-
Vietnamese exporter. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, 
shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement 
of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double 
antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to 
an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary

[[Page 22062]]

information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction 
of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation subject to sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    Commerce is issuing and publishing the final results of this review 
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 
CFR 351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: May 12, 2025.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Whether Commerce Erred in Applying Adverse Facts 
Available to Vinlong
    Comment 2: Surrogate Country Selection
    Comment 3: Selection of Surrogate Financial Statements
    Comment 4: Whether Certain Financial Statements are Suitable for 
Use
    Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should Incorporate Electricity 
Obtained from Sonha SSP's Affiliated Supplier
    Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should Coordinate with Customs and 
Border Protection Regarding Certain Entries of Vinlong
    Comment 7: Whether Benchmark Selection Criteria from 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings Are Relevant for Surrogate Country 
Selection
    Comment 8: Whether Commerce May Review Information Noted in Case 
Briefs That Were not Addressed in the Preliminary Results
    Comment 9: Whether the Commerce Has Treated Respondents Fairly
VI. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2025-09319 Filed 5-22-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on May 23, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.