Notice2025-08713
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Results and Rescission, in Part, of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2022
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
May 16, 2025
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that countervailable subsidies were provided to producers and exporters of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) from the Republic of Korea (Korea). The period of review (POR) is January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 94 (Friday, May 16, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 94 (Friday, May 16, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21002-21004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-08713]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-580-879]
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the Republic of
Korea: Final Results and Rescission, in Part, of the Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review; 2022
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
countervailable subsidies were provided to producers and exporters of
certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) from the Republic of
Korea (Korea). The period of review (POR) is January 1, 2022, through
December 31, 2022.
DATES: Applicable May 16, 2025.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel Accorsi or Shane Subler, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3149 or (202)
482-6241, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this administrative
review on August 12, 2024.\1\ On November 7, 2024, Commerce issued the
Post-Preliminary Analysis.\2\ On November 19, 2024, in accordance with
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
Commerce extended the deadline for issuing the final results until
February 4, 2025.\3\ Additionally, on December 9, 2024, Commerce tolled
the deadline to issue the final results in this administrative review
by 90 days.\4\ On May 2, 2025, Commerce extended the deadline for
issuing the final results
[[Page 21003]]
until May 9, 2025.\5\ For a description of the events that occurred
since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the
Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of the Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review; 2022, 89 FR 65586 (August 12, 2024)
(Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Post-
Preliminary Analysis of the Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review of Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the
Republic of Korea; 2022,'' dated November 7, 2024 (Post-Preliminary
Analysis).
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products
from the Republic of Korea: Extension of Deadline for Final Results
of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review,'' dated November 19,
2024.
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings,'' dated December 9, 2024.
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review,'' dated May 2, 2025.
\6\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results and Partial Rescission of the 2022 Administrative
Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Corrosion-
Resistant Steel Products from the Republic of Korea,'' dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order <SUP>7</SUP>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from India,
Italy, the Republic of Korea and the People's Republic of China:
Countervailing Duty Orders, 81 FR 48387 (July 25, 2016) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The product covered by this Order is CORE from Korea. For a
complete description of the scope of this Order, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in interested parties' case briefs are addressed
in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised by
parties, and to which Commerce responded in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum, is provided in the appendix to this notice. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly
at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record and comments received from
interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, and for the
reasons explained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, we made
certain revisions to the subsidy calculations for KG Dongbu Steel Co.,
Ltd. (KG Dongbu). As a result of the changes to KG Dongbu's preliminary
subsidy rate, the final subsidy rate for the five non-selected
companies under review also changed.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ For details on the changes made since the Preliminary
Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
Commerce conducted this review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(A) of the Act. For each of the subsidy programs found
countervailable, we find that there is a subsidy, i.e., a government-
provided financial contribution that gives rise to a benefit to the
recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.\9\ For a description of
the methodology underlying all of Commerce's conclusions, see the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding
benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partial Rescission of Review
Commerce's practice is to rescind an administrative review of a
countervailing duty (CVD) order, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), when
there are no reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR
for which liquidation is suspended.\10\ Normally, upon completion of an
administrative review, the suspended entries are liquidated at the CVD
assessment rate calculated for the review period.\11\ Therefore, for an
administrative review of a company to be conducted, there must be a
reviewable, suspended entry that Commerce can instruct U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate at the CVD assessment rate
calculated for the review period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See, e.g., Lightweight Thermal Paper from the People's
Republic of China: Notice of Rescission of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review; 2015, 82 FR 14349 (March 20, 2017); see also
Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe from the People's Republic
of China: Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review;
2017, 84 FR 14650 (April 11, 2019).
\11\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Preliminary Results, we found the following two companies
subject to this review did not have reviewable entries during the POR
for which liquidation is suspended: (1) SeAH Steel Corporation; and (2)
POSCO International. Accordingly, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), we
stated our intention to rescind the review with respect to these
companies in the final results.\12\ On November 19, 2024, we received
comments from POSCO, POSCO International, POSCO Coated & Color Steel
Co., Ltd., and POSCO Steeleon Co., Ltd. (collectively POSCO) claiming
that POSCO International had entries of subject merchandise during the
POR.\13\ After reviewing these comments, we find that POSCO
International had reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the
POR for which liquidation is suspended. Therefore, we are not
rescinding this administrative review with respect to POSCO
International. Because there is no evidence on the record that SeAH
Steel Corporation had entries, exports, or sales of subject merchandise
during the POR, and no party filed comments with respect to our
preliminary determination regarding this company, we are rescinding
this review with respect to SeAH Steel Corporation, consistent with 19
CFR 351.213(d)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Preliminary Results, 89 FR at 65587.
\13\ See POSCO's Letter, ``POSCO Case Brief,'' dated November
19, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Companies Not Selected for Individual Review
There are five companies for which a review was requested, but
which were not selected as mandatory respondents or found to be cross-
owned with a mandatory respondent. These companies are: (1) POSCO; (2)
POSCO Coated & Color Steel Co., Ltd.; (3) POSCO Steeleon Co., Ltd.; (4)
POSCO International; and (5) SeAH Coated Metal Corporation. For these
five companies, because the rates calculated for mandatory respondents
KG Dongbu and Hyundai Steel Company were above de minimis and not based
entirely on facts available, we applied a final subsidy rate based on a
weighted average of the rates calculated for the two mandatory
respondents using the publicly ranged sales data they submitted on the
record. This methodology for establishing the subsidy rate for the non-
selected companies is consistent with our practice and with section
705(c)(5)(A) of the Act.
Final Results of Review
We determine that, for the period January 1, 2022, through December
31, 2022, the following total net countervailable subsidy rates exist:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ We treated Hyundai Steel, Hyundai Steel Company, and
Hyundai Steel Co., Ltd. as minor variations of the same name at
respondent selection. See Memorandum, ``Respondent Selection,''
dated October 20, 2023, at Attachment; see also Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR
62322, 62333 (September 11, 2023).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidy rate (percent
Producer/exporter ad valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd.; KG Steel Corporation 4.02
[[Page 21004]]
Hyundai Steel Company \14\..................... 2.27
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Review-Specific Rate Applicable to Non-Selected Companies
------------------------------------------------------------------------
POSCO.......................................... 2.97
POSCO Coated & Color Steel Co., Ltd............ 2.97
POSCO International............................ 2.97
POSCO Steeleon Co., Ltd........................ 2.97
SeAH Coated Metal Corporation.................. 2.97
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose the calculations performed in
connection with the final results of review to interested parties in
this proceeding within five days of its public announcement, or if
there is no public announcement, within five days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with
19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(2), Commerce has determined, and CBP shall assess,
countervailing duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise
in accordance with the final results of this review, for the above-
listed companies at the applicable ad valorem assessment rates listed
for the POR (i.e., January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022). Commerce
intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP for these companies no
earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results
of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at
the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within
90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Rates
In accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act, Commerce intends
to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing
duties in the amounts shown for the POR for each of the respective
companies listed above on shipments of the subject merchandise entered,
or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of
publication of the final results of this administrative review. For all
non-reviewed firms subject to the Order, we will instruct CBP to
continue to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at
the most recent company-specific or all-others rate applicable to the
company, as appropriate. These cash deposit requirements, effective
upon the publication of the final results of this review, shall remain
in effect until further notice.
Administrative Protective Order (APO)
This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to
an APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of
proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary
information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these final results of administrative
review and notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1)
of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: May 9, 2025.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Rescission of Administrative Review, In Part
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Subsidies Valuation Information
VI. Analysis of Programs
VII. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd.'s (Dongbu Steel's)
2015-2018 Debt-to-Equity Swaps Should Be Countervailed
Comment 2: Whether Subsidies Prior to Dongbu Steel's Change in
Ownership (CIO) Pass Through to KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. (KG Dongbu
Steel)
Comment 3: Calculation of the Uncreditworthy Benchmark Rate and
Unequityworthy Discount Rates
Comment 4: Whether Commerce Used the Correct Uncreditworthy Rate
in the Benefit Calculations for the Long-Term Loan and Bond
Restructured in 2019
Comment 5: Whether the Provision of Korea Emissions Trading
System (K-ETS) Permits Is a Countervailable Subsidy
Comment 6: Whether the Provision of Electricity Is Subsidized by
the Government of Korea (GOK)
Comment 7: Whether the Provision of Electricity for Less Than
Adequate Remuneration (LTAR) Program Is Specific
Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should Rescind the Administrative
Review With Respect to POSCO International
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2025-08713 Filed 5-15-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on May 16, 2025.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.