Presidential DocumentExecutive Order 142942025-08681

Fighting Overcriminalization in Federal Regulations

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
May 14, 2025
Signed
May 9, 2025

Issuing agencies

Executive Office of the President

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 92 (Wednesday, May 14, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 92 (Wednesday, May 14, 2025)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Pages 20363-20365]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-08681]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 92 / Wednesday, May 14, 2025 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 20363]]


                Executive Order 14294 of May 9, 2025

                
Fighting Overcriminalization in Federal 
                Regulations

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, it is hereby ordered:

                Section 1. Purpose. The United States is drastically 
                overregulated. The Code of Federal Regulations contains 
                over 48,000 sections, stretching over 175,000 pages--
                far more than any citizen can possibly read, let alone 
                fully understand. Worse, many carry potential criminal 
                penalties for violations. The situation has become so 
                dire that no one--likely including those charged with 
                enforcing our criminal laws at the Department of 
                Justice--knows how many separate criminal offenses are 
                contained in the Code of Federal Regulations, with at 
                least one source estimating hundreds of thousands of 
                such crimes. Many of these regulatory crimes are 
                ``strict liability'' offenses, meaning that citizens 
                need not have a guilty mental state to be convicted of 
                a crime.

                This status quo is absurd and unjust. It allows the 
                executive branch to write the law, in addition to 
                executing it. That situation can lend itself to abuse 
                and weaponization by providing Government officials 
                tools to target unwitting individuals. It privileges 
                large corporations, which can afford to hire expensive 
                legal teams to navigate complex regulatory schemes and 
                fence out new market entrants, over average Americans.

                The purpose of this order is to ease the regulatory 
                burden on everyday Americans and ensure no American is 
                transformed into a criminal for violating a regulation 
                they have no reason to know exists.

                Sec. 2. Policy. It is the policy of the United States 
                that:

                    (a) Criminal enforcement of criminal regulatory 
                offenses is disfavored.
                    (b) Prosecution of criminal regulatory offenses is 
                most appropriate for persons who know or can be 
                presumed to know what is prohibited or required by the 
                regulation and willingly choose not to comply, thereby 
                causing or risking substantial public harm. 
                Prosecutions of criminal regulatory offenses should 
                focus on matters where a putative defendant is alleged 
                to have known his conduct was unlawful.
                    (c) Strict liability offenses are ``generally 
                disfavored.'' United States v. United States Gypsum, 
                Co., 438 U.S. 422, 438 (1978). Where enforcement is 
                appropriate, agencies should consider civil rather than 
                criminal enforcement of strict liability regulatory 
                offenses or, if appropriate and consistent with due 
                process and the right to jury trial, see Jarkesy v. 
                Securities and Exchange Commission, 603 U.S. 109 
                (2024), administrative enforcement.
                    (d) Agencies promulgating regulations potentially 
                subject to criminal enforcement should explicitly 
                describe the conduct subject to criminal enforcement, 
                the authorizing statutes, and the mens rea standard 
                applicable to those offenses.

                Sec. 3. Definitions. For purposes of this order:

                    (a) ``Agency'' has the meaning given to ``Executive 
                agency'' in section 105 of title 5, United States Code;
                    (b) ``Criminal regulatory offense'' means a Federal 
                regulation that is enforceable by a criminal penalty; 
                and
                    (c) ``Mens rea'' means the state of mind that by 
                law must be proven to convict a particular defendant of 
                a particular crime.

[[Page 20364]]

                Sec. 4. Report on Criminal Regulatory Offenses. (a) 
                Within 365 days of the date of this order, the head of 
                each agency, in consultation with the Attorney General, 
                shall provide to the Director of the Office of 
                Management and Budget (OMB) a report containing:

(i) a list of all criminal regulatory offenses enforceable by the agency or 
the Department of Justice; and

(ii) for each criminal regulatory offense identified in subsection (a)(i) 
of this section, the range of potential criminal penalties for a violation 
and the applicable mens rea standard for the criminal regulatory offense.

                    (b) At the same time the head of each agency 
                provides to the Director of OMB the report required by 
                subsection (a) of this section, the agency head shall 
                publicly post the report on its agency webpage.
                    (c) The head of each agency shall periodically, but 
                not less than once a year, update the report described 
                in subsection (a) of this section.
                    (d) Criminal enforcement of any criminal regulatory 
                offense not identified in the report described in 
                subsection (a) of this section is strongly discouraged. 
                The head of each agency shall consider whether a 
                criminal regulatory offense is included in an agency's 
                public report when considering whether to make a 
                criminal referral to the Department of Justice or, 
                where applicable, to the agency's Inspector General. 
                Further, the Attorney General shall consider whether a 
                criminal regulatory offense is included in an agency's 
                public report before initiating an investigation or 
                initiating criminal proceedings for violating 
                regulatory standards.

                Sec. 5. Promoting Regulatory Transparency. (a) 
                Following issuance of this order, all future notices of 
                proposed rulemaking (NPRMs) and final rules published 
                in the Federal Register, the violation of which may 
                constitute criminal regulatory offenses, should include 
                a statement identifying that the rule or proposed rule 
                is a criminal regulatory offense and the authorizing 
                statute. Agencies should draft this statement in 
                consultation with the Department of Justice.

                    (b) The regulatory text of all NPRMs and final 
                rules with criminal consequences published in the 
                Federal Register after the date of this order should 
                explicitly state a mens rea requirement for each 
                element of a criminal regulatory offense, accompanied 
                by citations to the relevant provisions of the 
                authorizing statute.
                    (c) Strict liability criminal regulatory offenses 
                are disfavored. Any proposed or final criminal 
                regulatory offense that includes a strict liability 
                mens rea for the offense shall be treated as a 
                ``significant regulatory action'' and submitted to the 
                Administrator of the Office of Information and 
                Regulatory Affairs for the review applicable to 
                significant regulatory actions under Executive Order 
                12866 of September 30, 1993 (Regulatory Planning and 
                Review), or any successor process.

                Sec. 6. Default Mens Rea for Criminal Regulatory 
                Offenses. (a) The head of each agency, in consultation 
                with the Attorney General, shall examine the agency's 
                statutory authorities and determine whether there is 
                authority to adopt a background mens rea standard for 
                criminal regulatory offenses that applies unless a 
                specific regulation states an alternative mens rea.

                    (b) Within 30 days of the submission of the report 
                described in section 4(a) of this order, the head of 
                each agency, in consultation with the Attorney General, 
                shall submit a report to the Director of OMB 
                summarizing the information submitted under section 
                4(a) of this order and assessing whether the applicable 
                mens rea standards for criminal regulatory offenses 
                enforced by the agency are appropriate. If consistent 
                with the statutory authorities identified pursuant to 
                the review described in subsection (a) of this section, 
                the report should present a plan for changing the 
                applicable mens rea standards and adopting a generally 
                applicable background mens rea standard, and provide a 
                justification for each criminal regulatory offense for 
                which the agency proposes to deviate from its default 
                mens rea standard.

                Sec. 7. Agency Referrals for Potential Criminal 
                Enforcement. Within 45 days of the date of this order, 
                and in consultation with the Attorney General,

[[Page 20365]]

                each agency should publish guidance in the Federal 
                Register describing its plan to address criminally 
                liable regulatory offenses. Each agency's guidance 
                should make clear that when the agency is deciding 
                whether to refer alleged violations of criminal 
                regulatory offenses to the Department of Justice, the 
                agency should consider factors such as:

                    (a) the harm or risk of harm, pecuniary or 
                otherwise, caused by the alleged offense;
                    (b) the potential gain to the putative defendant 
                that could result from the offense;
                    (c) whether the putative defendant held specialized 
                knowledge, expertise, or was licensed in an industry 
                related to the rule or regulation at issue; and
                    (d) evidence, if any is available, of the putative 
                defendant's general awareness of the unlawfulness of 
                his conduct as well as his knowledge or lack thereof of 
                the regulation at issue.

                Sec. 8. Effect on Immigration Enforcement and National 
                Security Functions. Nothing in this order shall apply 
                to the enforcement of the immigration laws or 
                regulations promulgated to implement such laws, nor 
                shall it apply to the enforcement of laws or 
                regulations related to national security or defense.

                Sec. 9. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order 
                shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or 
the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget 
relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

                    (b) This order shall be implemented consistent with 
                applicable law and subject to the availability of 
                appropriations.
                    (c) This order is not intended to, and does not, 
                create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, 
                enforceable at law or in equity by any party against 
                the United States, its departments, agencies, or 
                entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any 
                other person.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    May 9, 2025.

[FR Doc. 2025-08681
Filed 5-13-25; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3395-F4-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on May 14, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.