Rule2025-08144

Medical Devices; Immunology and Microbiology Devices; Classification of the Device To Detect and Measure Non-Microbial Analytes To Aid in the Detection and Identification of Localized Human Infections

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
May 9, 2025
Effective
May 9, 2025

Issuing agencies

Health and Human Services DepartmentFood and Drug Administration

Abstract

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, the Agency, or we) is classifying the device to detect and measure non-microbial analytes to aid in the detection and identification of localized human infections into class II (special controls). The special controls that apply to the device type are identified in this order and will be part of the codified language for the device to detect and measure non-microbial analytes to aid in the detection and identification of localized human infections' classification. We are taking this action because we have determined that classifying the device into class II (special controls) will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device. We believe this action will also enhance patients' access to beneficial innovative devices, in part by reducing regulatory burdens.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 89 (Friday, May 9, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 89 (Friday, May 9, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19641-19643]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-08144]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 866

[Docket No. FDA-2025-N-0781]


Medical Devices; Immunology and Microbiology Devices; 
Classification of the Device To Detect and Measure Non-Microbial 
Analytes To Aid in the Detection and Identification of Localized Human 
Infections

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human 
Services (HHS).

ACTION: Final amendment; final order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, the Agency, or we) is 
classifying the device to detect and measure non-microbial analytes to 
aid in the detection and identification of localized human infections 
into class II (special controls). The special controls that apply to 
the device type are identified in this order and will be part of the 
codified language for the device to detect and measure non-microbial 
analytes to aid in the detection and identification of localized human 
infections' classification. We are taking this action because we have 
determined that classifying the device into class II (special controls) 
will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the 
device. We believe this action will also enhance patients' access to 
beneficial innovative devices, in part by reducing regulatory burdens.

DATES: This order is effective May 9, 2025. The classification was 
applicable on May 23, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dina Jerebitski, Center for Devices 
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New 
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 3574, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-2411, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bafed3d4db94f0dfc8dfd8d3cec9d1d3fadcdedb94d2d2c994ddd5cc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="16527f7877385c736473747f62657d7f56707277387e7e6538717960">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Upon request, FDA has classified the device to detect and measure 
non-microbial analytes to aid in the detection and identification of 
localized human infections as class II (special controls), which we 
have determined will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and 
effectiveness. In addition, we believe this action will enhance 
patients' access to beneficial innovation, in part by reducing 
regulatory burdens by placing the device into a lower device class than 
the automatic class III assignment.
    The automatic assignment of class III occurs by operation of law 
and without any action by FDA, regardless of the level of risk posed by 
the new device. Any device that was not in commercial distribution 
before May 28, 1976, is automatically classified as, and remains 
within, class III and requires premarket approval unless and until FDA 
takes an action to classify or reclassify the device (see 21 U.S.C. 
360c(f)(1)). We refer to these devices as ``postamendments devices'' 
because they were not in commercial distribution prior to the date of 
enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, which amended the 
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).
    FDA may take a variety of actions in appropriate circumstances to 
classify or reclassify a device into class I or II. We may issue an 
order finding a new device to be substantially equivalent under section 
513(i) of the FD&C Act (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device 
that does not require premarket approval. We determine whether a new 
device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device by means of 
the procedures for premarket notification under section 510(k) of the 
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
    FDA may also classify a device through ``De Novo'' classification, 
a common name for the process authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the 
FD&C Act (see also part 860, subpart D (21 CFR part 860, subpart D)). 
Section 207 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 
1997 (Pub. L. 105-115) established the first procedure for De Novo 
classification. Section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration Safety 
and Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112-144) modified the De Novo application 
process by adding a second procedure. A device sponsor may utilize 
either procedure for De Novo classification.
    Under the first procedure, the person submits a 510(k) for a device 
that has not previously been classified. After receiving an order from 
FDA classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of 
the FD&C Act, the person then requests a classification under section 
513(f)(2).
    Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a 510(k) 
and then a request for classification, if the person determines that 
there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination 
of substantial equivalence, that person requests a classification under 
section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.
    Under either procedure for De Novo classification, FDA is required 
to classify the device by written order

[[Page 19642]]

within 120 days. The classification will be according to the criteria 
under section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. Although the device was 
automatically placed within class III, the De Novo classification is 
considered to be the initial classification of the device.
    We believe this De Novo classification will enhance patients' 
access to beneficial innovation, in part by reducing regulatory 
burdens. When FDA classifies a device into class I or II via the De 
Novo process, the device can serve as a predicate for future devices of 
that type, including for 510(k)s (see section 513(f)(2)(B)(i) of the 
FD&C Act). As a result, other device sponsors do not have to submit a 
De Novo request or premarket approval application to market a 
substantially equivalent device (see section 513(i) of the FD&C Act, 
defining ``substantial equivalence''). Instead, sponsors can use the 
less-burdensome 510(k) process, when necessary, to market their device.

II. De Novo Classification

    On June 29, 2018, FDA received CD Diagnostics Inc.'s request for De 
Novo classification of the Synovasure Alpha Defensin Lateral Flow Test 
Kit, Synovasure Alpha Defensin Lateral Flow Test Kit (5 Test), 
Synovasure Alpha Defensin Lateral Flow Test Kit (10 Test), Synovasure 
Alpha Defensin Lateral Flow Test Kit (30 Test), and the Synovasure 
Alpha Defensin Control Kit. FDA reviewed the request in order to 
classify the device under the criteria for classification set forth in 
section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
    We classify devices into class II if general controls by themselves 
are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and 
effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to establish special 
controls that, in combination with the general controls, provide 
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for 
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the 
information submitted in the request, we determined that the device can 
be classified into class II with the establishment of special controls. 
FDA has determined that these special controls, in addition to the 
general controls, will provide reasonable assurance of the safety and 
effectiveness of the device.
    Therefore, on May 23, 2019, FDA issued an order to the requester 
classifying the device into class II. In this final order, FDA is 
codifying the classification of the device by adding 21 CFR 
866.3230.\1\ We have named the generic type of device ``Device to 
detect and measure non-microbial analytes to aid in the detection and 
identification of localized human infections,'' and it is identified as 
an in vitro diagnostic device intended for the detection and 
qualitative measurement, quantitative measurement, or both of one or 
more non-microbial analytes in human clinical specimens to aid in the 
assessment, identification, or both of a localized microbial infection 
when used in conjunction with clinical signs and symptoms and other 
clinical and laboratory findings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ FDA notes that the ``ACTION'' caption for this final order 
is styled as ``Final amendment; final order,'' rather than ``Final 
order.'' Beginning in December 2019, this editorial change was made 
to indicate that the document ``amends'' the Code of Federal 
Regulations. The change was made in accordance with the Office of 
the Federal Register's (OFR) interpretations of the Federal Register 
Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations (1 CFR 5.9 
and parts 21 and 22), and the Document Drafting Handbook.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FDA has identified the following risks to health associated 
specifically with this type of device and the measures required to 
mitigate these risks in table 1.

 Table 1--Device To Detect and Measure Non-Microbial Analytes To Aid in
the Detection and Identification of Localized Human Infections Risks and
                           Mitigation Measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Identified risks to health              Mitigation measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Risk of false test results...  Certain device descriptions, performance
                                characteristics, results interpretation
                                information, limitations, and study
                                details in labeling;
                               Certain device description information,
                                demographic analysis, validation
                                procedures, risk mitigation strategies
                                and end user trainings, and studies; and
                               Collection device specification.
Failure to interpret test      Certain device descriptions, performance
 results correctly.             characteristics, results interpretation
                                information, limitations, and study
                                details in labeling; and
                               Certain demographic analysis, validation
                                procedures, risk mitigation strategies
                                and end user trainings, and studies.
Failure to operate the device  Certain device descriptions, performance
 correctly.                     characteristics, results interpretation
                                information, limitations, and study
                                details in labeling;
                               Certain demographic analysis, validation
                                procedures, risk mitigation strategies
                                and end user trainings, and studies; and
                               Collection device specification.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FDA has determined that special controls, in combination with the 
general controls, address these risks to health and provide reasonable 
assurance of safety and effectiveness. For a device to fall within this 
classification, and thus avoid automatic classification in class III, 
it would have to comply with the special controls named in this final 
order. The necessary special controls appear in the regulation codified 
by this order. This device is subject to premarket notification 
requirements under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.

III. Analysis of Environmental Impact

    The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is 
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental 
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.

IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This final order establishes special controls that refer to 
previously approved collections of information found in other FDA 
regulations and guidance. These collections of information are subject 
to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521). The collections 
of information part 860, subpart D, regarding De Novo

[[Page 19643]]

classification have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0844; 
the collections of information in 21 CFR part 814, subparts A through 
E, regarding premarket approval, have been approved under OMB control 
number 0910-0231; the collections of information in part 807, subpart 
E, regarding premarket notification submissions, have been approved 
under OMB control number 0910-0120; the collections of information in 
21 CFR part 820, regarding the Quality System Regulation, have been 
approved under OMB control number 0910-0073; and the collections of 
information in 21 CFR parts 801 and 809, regarding labeling, have been 
approved under OMB control number 0910-0485.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 866

    Biologics, Laboratories, Medical devices.

    Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under 
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 
866 is amended as follows:

PART 866--IMMUNOLOGY AND MICROBIOLOGY DEVICES

0
1. The authority citation for part 866 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371.


0
2. Add Sec.  866.3230 to subpart D to read as follows:


Sec.  866.3230   Device to detect and measure non-microbial analytes to 
aid in the detection and identification of localized human infections.

    (a) Identification. A device to detect and measure non-microbial 
analytes to aid in the detection and identification of localized human 
infections is identified as an in vitro diagnostic device intended for 
the detection and qualitative measurement, quantitative measurement, or 
both of one or more non-microbial analytes in human clinical specimens 
to aid in the assessment, identification, or both of a localized 
microbial infection when used in conjunction with clinical signs and 
symptoms and other clinical and laboratory findings.
    (b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special 
controls for this device are:
    (1) Any sample collection device used must be FDA-cleared, -
approved, or -classified as 510(k) exempt (standalone or as part of a 
test system) for the collection of human specimens; alternatively, the 
sample collection device must be cleared in a premarket submission as a 
part of this device.
    (2) The labeling required under Sec.  809.10(b) of this chapter 
must include:
    (i) An intended use with a detailed description of what the device 
detects and measures, the type of results provided to the user, the 
sample type, whether the measure is qualitative and/or quantitative, 
the clinical indications for the test use, and the specific 
population(s) for which the device is intended.
    (ii) A detailed description of the performance characteristics of 
the device for all intended specimen types from the analytical and 
clinical studies (as applicable) required under paragraphs (b)(3)(ii) 
and (iii) of this section.
    (iii) A detailed explanation of the interpretation of results, 
including acceptance criteria for evaluating the validity of individual 
runs (e.g., assessment of internal and/or external quality controls, as 
applicable).
    (iv) The following limiting statements:
    (A) A statement that a negative test result does not preclude the 
possibility of infection;
    (B) A statement that the test results should be interpreted in 
conjunction with other clinical and laboratory data available to the 
clinician;
    (C) A statement that consistent device performance is dependent on 
adequate specimen collection, transport, storage, and processing. 
Failure to observe proper procedures in any one of these steps can lead 
to incorrect results; and
    (D) A statement that details any limitations associated with the 
samples, as appropriate (e.g., collected on the day of admission to the 
intensive care unit).
    (3) Design verification and validation must include the following:
    (i) A detailed device description, including as appropriate, all 
device parts; control elements incorporated into the test procedure; 
instrument requirements; reagents required but not provided; and the 
principle of device operation and test methodology, including all 
preanalytical methods for the processing of specimens and the 
methodology from obtaining a sample to the result; design of primer/
probe sequences; rationale for target analyte selection; and 
computational path from collected raw data to reported result (e.g., 
how collected raw signals are converted into a reported result).
    (ii) Detailed documentation of analytical studies including 
analytical sensitivity (Limit of Detection, Limit of Quantitation, and 
Limit of Blank), inclusivity, cross-reactivity, microbial interference, 
interfering substances, competitive inhibition, carryover/cross-
contamination, specimen stability, within-lab precision, 
reproducibility, and linearity, as applicable.
    (iii) Detailed documentation and results either from a clinical 
study, that includes prospective (sequentially collected) samples for 
each intended specimen type that are representative of the intended use 
populations and, when determined to be acceptable by FDA, additional 
characterized clinical samples; or, when determined to be acceptable by 
FDA, an equivalent sample set. The clinical study must compare the 
device performance to results obtained from an FDA-accepted reference 
method and/or FDA-accepted comparator method, as appropriate. 
Documentation from the clinical studies must include the clinical study 
protocol (e.g., the predefined statistical analysis plan), clinical 
study report, testing results, and results of all statistical analyses.
    (iv) An evaluation of the level of the non-microbial analyte in 
asymptomatic patients with demographic characteristics (e.g., age, 
racial, ethnic, and sex distribution) similar to the intended use 
population of the device.
    (v) Documentation of an appropriate end user device training 
program that will be offered as part of efforts to mitigate the risks 
of false results, failure to operate the device correctly, and failure 
to interpret test results correctly.
    (vi) An appropriate risk mitigation strategy to ensure that the 
device does not prevent any other device(s) with which it is indicated 
for use, including incorporated device(s), from achieving their 
intended use (e.g., safety and effectiveness of the functions of the 
indicated device(s) remain unaffected).
    (vii) A detailed description of the impact of any software, 
including software applications and hardware-based devices that 
incorporate software, on the device's functions.

    Dated: May 5, 2025.
Grace R. Graham,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Legislation, and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2025-08144 Filed 5-8-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on May 9, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.